DOCSLIB.ORG

Domestic Adoption of Children in Kenya

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Domestic Adoption of Children in Kenya Master of Advanced Studies in Children’s Rights (2011 – 2012) INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE KURT BOSCH – UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG Advancing the rights of children deprived of parental care: Domestic adoption of children in Kenya Denise STUCKENBRUCK Thesis submitted in the framework of the Master of Advanced Studies in Children’s Rights 02 April 2013 Tutor: Prof. Nigel Cantwell Advancing the rights of children deprived of parental care: Domestic adoption of children in Kenya Denise STUCKENBRUCK April 2013 Affiliated to the Institute of Development Studies of the University of Nairobi Approved by the National Council for Science and Technology of the Republic of Kenya Research Permit number: NCST/RCD/14/012/1552 The author can be contacted at [email protected] Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ x List of tables and figures ....................................................................................... xii List of acronyms ................................................................................................... xiii Glossary ............................................................................................................... xiv Executive summary .............................................................................................. xix 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Problem statement and objective ....................................................................... 4 1.3. Brief history of formal adoption .......................................................................... 5 1.4. Child care and adoption in Africa: some perspectives .......................................... 7 1.5. Children without parental care: do we know where and how many they are? ..... 9 1.6. Trends in adoption ............................................................................................ 11 1.7. Domestic adoption on the African agenda ......................................................... 13 2. Research framework ...................................................................................... 15 2.1. Scope ................................................................................................................ 15 2.2. Hypothesis and research questions ................................................................... 16 2.3. Theoretical and interdisciplinary approach ........................................................ 16 2.4. Methodology .................................................................................................... 17 2.4.1. Literature review ................................................................................................. 17 2.4.2. Quantitative data analysis ................................................................................... 18 2.4.3. Qualitative data analysis...................................................................................... 19 2.5. Ethics ................................................................................................................ 21 2.6. Limitations ........................................................................................................ 22 v 3. The rights of the child deprived of a family environment ................................ 23 3.1. The family environment .................................................................................... 23 3.2. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ................................................... 25 3.2.1. The Committee on the Rights of the Child ............................................................. 30 3.2.1.1. Day of General Discussion.................................................................................................. 30 3.2.1.2. Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children ................................................................. 31 3.2.1.3. General Comments ............................................................................................................ 34 3.2.1.4. Concluding Observations ................................................................................................... 35 3.3. The African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child ............................... 40 3.3.1. African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child .................... 43 3.4. Convention on protection of children and co-operation in respect of intercountry adoption ..................................................................................................................... 44 4. Situation of children without parental care and the care system in Kenya ...... 48 4.1. Kenya: facts and figures .................................................................................... 48 4.2. The situation of children without parental care ................................................. 49 4.3. Monitoring of Kenya’s international child rights commitments .......................... 53 4.3.1. Convention on the Rights of the Child ................................................................... 53 4.3.2. African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child .......................................... 58 4.3.3. The Hague Convention ......................................................................................... 59 4.4. Kenya’s legal and policy framework for alternative care and adoption .............. 60 4.4.1. The Children Act ................................................................................................... 60 4.4.2. CCI and Adoption Regulations .............................................................................. 62 4.4.3. National Plans of Action ....................................................................................... 64 4.4.4. Draft Kenyan Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children ................................. 65 4.5. Adoption practice in Kenya ............................................................................... 66 4.5.1. The process .......................................................................................................... 66 4.5.2. The actors ............................................................................................................ 67 4.5.2.1. The High Court ................................................................................................................... 67 4.5.2.2. The Adoption Committee ................................................................................................... 67 4.5.2.3. The Department of Children’s Services .............................................................................. 68 4.5.2.4. Adoption Societies ............................................................................................................. 69 4.5.2.5. Charitable Children Institutions ......................................................................................... 70 4.5.2.6. Lawyers .............................................................................................................................. 71 vi 5. Perceptions, beliefs and experiences concerning domestic adoption of children in Kenya................................................................................................................ 73 5.1. Profile of informants ......................................................................................... 73 5.2. Perceptions and beliefs about residential and kinship care ................................ 77 5.2.1. Residential care ................................................................................................... 78 5.2.2. Kinship care ......................................................................................................... 81 5.3. Perceptions and beliefs about adoption of children ........................................... 85 5.4. Main elements motivating Kenyans to adopt .................................................... 88 5.5. Barriers preventing Kenyans from adopting children ......................................... 93 5.5.1. The transition from informal to formal care .......................................................... 93 5.5.2. Complexity, weaknesses and costs of the process .................................................. 96 5.5.3. Cultural beliefs and social practices leading to discrimination ............................. 101 5.6. The adoption experience ................................................................................ 102 5.6.1. Expressing preferences ....................................................................................... 102 5.6.2. What worked well and the challenges faced in the process ................................. 105 5.7. Suggestions on how to popularize adoption .................................................... 107 5.7.1. Promote public education and awareness raising................................................ 107 5.7.2. Reduce costs and simplify procedures ................................................................. 109 5.8. Final reflections .............................................................................................. 110 6. Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................. 112 6.1. Conclusions ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Re-Imagining United States History Through Contemporary Asian American and Latina/O Literature
    LATINASIAN NATION: RE-IMAGINING UNITED STATES HISTORY THROUGH CONTEMPORARY ASIAN AMERICAN AND LATINA/O LITERATURE Susan Bramley Thananopavarn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English and Comparative Literature in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: María DeGuzmán Jennifer Ho Minrose Gwin Laura Halperin Ruth Salvaggio © 2015 Susan Bramley Thananopavarn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Susan Thananopavarn: LatinAsian Nation: Re-imagining United States History through Contemporary Asian American and Latina/o Literature (Under the direction of Jennifer Ho and María DeGuzmán) Asian American and Latina/o populations in the United States are often considered marginal to discourses of United States history and nationhood. From laws like the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act to the extensive, racially targeted immigration rhetoric of the twenty-first century, dominant discourses in the United States have legally and rhetorically defined Asian and Latina/o Americans as alien to the imagined nation. However, these groups have histories within the United States that stretch back more than four hundred years and complicate foundational narratives like the immigrant “melting pot,” the black/white binary, and American exceptionalism. This project examines how Asian American and Latina/o literary narratives can rewrite official histories and situate American history within a global context. The literary texts that I examine – including works by Carlos Bulosan, Américo Paredes, Luis Valdez, Mitsuye Yamada, Susan Choi, Achy Obejas, Karen Tei Yamashita, Cristina García, and Siu Kam Wen – create a “LatinAsian” view of the Americas that highlights and challenges suppressed aspects of United States history.
    [Show full text]
  • Fostered Voices Narratives of US Foster Care 2019 Greer
    FOSTERED VOICES: NARRATIVES OF U.S. FOSTER CARE A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Nikky R. Greer December 2019 Examining Committee Members: Mindie Lazarus-Black, Advisory Chair, Department of Anthropology Inmaculada Garcia-Sanchez, Department of Anthropology Paul Garrett, Department of Anthropology Caterina Roman, External Member, Department of Criminal Justice © Copyright 2019 by Nicole R. Greer All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Critiques of the U.S. foster care system as “broken” span multiple disciplines, including journalism, social work, sociology, psychology, and legal studies. Foster care “brokenness” is poorly defined in these critiques but generally refers to how policies and practices fail to adequately help and support people involved with the foster care system. These disciplines approach understanding “brokenness” via a single problem (e.g., specific policies, inadequate prevention programs, family and community deficits) or measures of “outcomes” (e.g., the foster-care-to-prison-pipeline, low educational attainment for fostered youth, drug abuse). This study applied anthropological methods and theories to the problem of the system’s “brokenness.” In particular, I used participant observation, semi-structured interviews, qualitative surveys, and media and historical analyses to examine foster care as a social, political, economic, and hierarchical institution comprised of the subjects of foster care, namely fostered youth, their kin, foster parents, and foster care professionals. I conducted data collection for 46 months and relied on two fieldsites: a geographic expanse of urban and rural South Texas consisting of courts, community meetings, non- profit foster care organizations, foster care training sites, and private homes, and a digital, qualitative survey with respondents across the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • International Adoption and the “Best Interests” of the Child: Reality and Reactionism in Romania and Guatemala
    Washington University Global Studies Law Review Volume 9 Issue 3 January 2010 International Adoption and the “Best Interests” of the Child: Reality and Reactionism in Romania and Guatemala Lisa M. Yemm Washington University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Lisa M. Yemm, International Adoption and the “Best Interests” of the Child: Reality and Reactionism in Romania and Guatemala, 9 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 555 (2010), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol9/iss3/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Global Studies Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION AND THE “BEST INTERESTS” OF THE CHILD: REALITY AND REACTIONISM IN ROMANIA AND GUATEMALA I. INTRODUCTION This Note will examine the effects of recent legislation, passed, proposed, and pending, in countries that provide a significant percentage of the world‘s internationally adopted children.1 The geographically and culturally disparate countries of Romania and Guatemala have been two of the largest providers of internationally adopted children over the past two decades,2 but recent legislation on both the national and international levels
    [Show full text]
  • The 2003 Congressional Awards Celebration
    A Celebration of those Committed Individuals Making a Difference in the Lives of Children and Families September 30, 2003 Washington, DC AngelsTHE 2003 CONGRESSIONAL in TM AWAdoptionARDS CELEBRATION Each year,the Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute, CCAI, invites Members of Congress to recognize those individuals who have made a difference in the lives of children and families through adoption by giving them the Congressional Angels in AdoptionTM Award. CCAI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to raising awareness about the tens of thousands of foster children in this country and the millions of orphans around the world in need of permanent, safe, and loving homes; and to eliminating the barriers that hinder these children from realizing their basic need of a family. AngelsTHE 2003 CONGRESSIONAL in AdoptionTM AWARDS CELEBRATION Welcome Tom Jarriel ABCNEWS Anchor, 20/20 Correspondent Message from the Director Kerry Marks Hasenbalg Executive Director, CCAI Message from Event Sponsor Maxine B. Baker President and CEO, Freddie Mac Foundation, Founding & Premier Sponsor Musical Performance Nicole Yonkosky God Bless America 2001 Angel in Adoption™ Award Recipient Invocation Barry Black Chaplain of the United States Senate Presentation of National Congressman Jim Oberstar and Angels in AdoptionTM Award Congressman Dave Camp to Muhammad and Lonnie Ali Presentation of National Senator Larry Craig and Angels in AdoptionTM Award Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist to Bruce Willis Special Musical Performance Steven Curtis Chapman
    [Show full text]
  • The Orphan Crisis in Global Child Welfare from an Autoethnographic Perspective
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons School of Social Work: Faculty Publications and Other Works Faculty Publications 2013 “Where’s beebee?”: The orphan crisis in global child welfare from an autoethnographic perspective Katherine Tyson McCrea Loyola University Chicago, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/socialwork_facpubs Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation McCrea, Katherine Tyson. "“Where’s beebee?”: The orphan crisis in global child welfare from an autoethnographic perspective." In Narrating Social Work Through Autoethnography, edited by Stanley Witkin. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Social Work: Faculty Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. © Columbia University Press, 2013. “Where’s beebee?”: The orphan crisis in global child welfare from an autoethnographic perspective Katherine Tyson McCrea, Ph.D. Professor Loyola University of Chicago School of Social Work [email protected] 312-915-7028 Invited Book Chapter for Narrating Social Work Through Autoethnography Edited by Stanley Witkin, Ph.D. Professor, University of Vermont Department of Social Work Columbia University Press (forthcoming) Please do not reproduce without permission “Where’s beebee?”: The orphan crisis in global child welfare from an autoethnographic perspective Abstract “Where’s beebee” asked our year-old son David in the only way he could, which was by carrying around a toddler-sized doll everywhere he went, often saying, “beebee?” This was his way of saying that he was missing his twin brother, who was separated from him by several tragic circumstances in the international adoption process.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Child Abduction for Human Rights and Child Welfare Systems
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2013 IMPLICATIONS OF CHILD ABDUCTION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND CHILD WELFARE SYSTEMS: A CONSTRUCTIVIST INQUIRY OF THE LIVED EXPERIENCE OF GUATEMALAN MOTHERS PUBLICALLY REPORTING CHILD ABDUCTION FOR INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION Carmen Monico Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Social Work Commons © The Author Downloaded from http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/3137 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IMPLICATIONS OF CHILD ABDUCTION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND CHILD WELFARE SYSTEMS: A CONSTRUCTIVIST INQUIRY OF THE LIVED EXPERIENCE OF GUATEMALAN MOTHERS PUBLICALLY REPORTING CHILD ABDUCTION FOR INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Virginia Commonwealth University. By CARMEN C. MÓNICO Bachelor of Science, University of Maryland University College, 1997 Master of Science, American University, 2001 Master in Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2011 Director: Humberto Fabelo, Ph.D., L.C. S.W. Associate Dean for Academic and Student Affairs and Associate Professor School of Social Work Virginia Commonwealth University April 25, 2013 © Carmen C. Mónico 2013 ______________________________ All Rights Reserved i Acknowledgements “It takes a village to raise a child,” says the old African proverb. While completing this dissertation paper, I realized that apparently, it “takes a village” to complete a dissertation project also.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala Country Case Study: Child Rights Commissioned by Norad and Sida
    2011:1 UTV Working Paper Claudia Barrientos Virgilio Álvarez Aragón John-Andrew McNeish Guatemala Country Case Study: Child Rights Commissioned by Norad and Sida Guatemala Country Case Study: Child Rights Commissioned by Norad and Sida Claudia Barrientos Virgilio Álvarez Aragón John-Andrew McNeish UTV Working Paper 2011:1 Sida Authors: Claudia Barrientos, Virgilio Álvarez Aragón, John-Andrew McNeish The views and interpretations expressed in this report are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of Sida and Norad. UTV Working Paper 2011:1 Commissioned by Sida and Norad Copyright: Sida and the authors Date of final report: February 2011 Printed by: Citat Art. no. Sida61386en ISBN 978-91-586-4169-3 URN:NBN: se-2011-2 This publication can be downloaded/ordered from: http://www.sida.se/publications SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY Address: SE-105 25 Stockholm, Sweden. Visiting address: Valhallavägen 199. Phone: +46 (0)8-698 50 00. Fax: +46 (0)8-20 88 64. www.sida.se [email protected] Table of Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms and abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Background ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT No. 72/15 CASE 12.896 MERITS RAMÍREZ BROTHERS and FAMILY GUATEMALA OCTOBER 28, 2015
    OEA/Ser.L/V/II.155 REPORT No. 72 /15 Doc. 25 October 28, 2015 CASE 12.896 Original: Spanish REPORT ON MERITS RAMÍREZ BROTHERS AND FAMILY GUATEMALA Approved by the Commission at its session No. 2053 held on October 28, 2015 156 Regular Period of Sessions Cite as: IACHR, Report No. 72/15, Case 12.896, Merits, Ramírez Brothers and family, Guatemala, October 28, 2015. www.cidh.org REPORT No. 72/15 CASE 12.896 MERITS RAMÍREZ BROTHERS AND FAMILY GUATEMALA OCTOBER 28, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................................................2 II. PROCEEDINGS BEFPRE THE COMMISSION ....................................................................................................... 2 III. POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES .................................................................................................................................. 3 A. Position of the petitioners ........................................................................................................................................ 3 B. Position of the State .................................................................................................................................................... 4 IV. ANALYSIS OF THE MERITS ...................................................................................................................................... 5 A. Established facts ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Family-Making: from Acquisition to Interconnection
    Volume 64 Issue 2 Article 3 7-1-2019 Collaborative Family-Making: From Acquisition to Interconnection Pamela Laufer-Ukeles Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr Part of the Family Law Commons Recommended Citation Pamela Laufer-Ukeles, Collaborative Family-Making: From Acquisition to Interconnection, 64 Vill. L. Rev. 223 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol64/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Law Review by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Laufer-Ukeles: Collaborative Family-Making: From Acquisition to Interconnection 2019] COLLABORATIVE FAMILY-MAKING: FROM ACQUISITION TO INTERCONNECTION PAMELA LAUFER-UKELES* I. INTRODUCTION N a consumer-driven society, it should come as no surprise that baby Imarkets are booming.1 Indeed, we can use a catalogue to pick the pre- ferred genetic traits of intended children,2 or even to peruse potential children for adoption.3 Adults want to have children in order to build a family. Family provides status, stability, security, joy, support, and com- fort.4 But, when biological or social infertility comes between modern * Professor of Law and Professor of Health Management, Academic Center of Law & Science, Hod Hasharon, Israel. Thanks to Barbara Bennett Woodhouse, Michele Goodwin, Naomi Cahn, Sonia Suter, Jody Lynee Madeira, Nancy Dowd, Rahdikha Rao, Laurence McCollough, Ruth Zafran, Rachel Rebouche, and all the participants of the 2017 Baby Markets Roundtable and the 2018 Law & Society Panel on Human Rights in the Americas for their helpful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala Mission
    mai / May 2007 COMPTE-RENDU D’UNE MISSION D’INFORMATION AU GUATEMALA RELATIVE À L’ADOPTION INTERNATIONALE 26 FÉVRIER – 9 MARS 2007 établi par Ignacio Goicoechea, Collaborateur juridique de liaison pour l’Amérique latine assisté de Jennifer Degeling, Collaboratrice juridique principale * * * REPORT OF A FACT-FINDING MISSION TO GUATEMALA IN RELATION TO INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION 26 FEBRUARY – 9 MARCH 2007 prepared by Ignacio Goicoechea, Liaison Legal Officer for Latin America with the assistance of Jennifer Degeling, Principal Legal Officer Permanent Bureau | Bureau Permanent 6, Scheveningseweg 2517 KT The Hague | La Haye The Netherlands | Pays-Bas telephone | téléphone +31 (70) 363 3303 fax | télécopieur +31 (70) 360 4867 e-mail | courriel [email protected] website | site internet http ://www.hcch.net COMPTE-RENDU D’UNE MISSION D’INFORMATION AU GUATEMALA RELATIVE À L’ADOPTION INTERNATIONALE 26 FÉVRIER – 9 MARS 2007 établi par Ignacio Goicoechea, Collaborateur juridique de liaison pour l’Amérique latine assisté de Jennifer Degeling, Collaboratrice juridique principale * * * REPORT OF A FACT-FINDING MISSION TO GUATEMALA IN RELATION TO INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION 26 FEBRUARY – 9 MARCH 2007 prepared by Ignacio Goicoechea, Liaison Legal Officer for Latin America with the assistance of Jennifer Degeling, Principal Legal Officer TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 6 GLOSSARY ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Adoption: the Child's Story, 24 Ga
    Georgia State University Law Review Volume 24 Article 1 Issue 2 Winter 2007 March 2012 International Adoption: The hiC ld's Story Elizabeth Bartholet Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Elizabeth Bartholet, International Adoption: The Child's Story, 24 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. (2012). Available at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol24/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bartholet: International Adoption: The Child's Story INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION: THE CIDLD'SCHILD'S STORY Elizabeth Bartholet* Millions of infants and young children worldwide are desperately in need of nurturing homes. Many are living in institutions, and many on the streets, and almost all these children will either die in these situations, or if theythey survive, will emerge into adulthood so damaged by their childhood experience, and so deprived of parenting, educational and other essential childhood opportunities, that they will be unable to function in the worlds offamily family and work. International adoption could provide significant numbers of nurturing homes for these children. However, current policy restricts international adoption, limiting its ability to provide such homes. Moreover, most of the powerful organizations of the world that claim to represent children's rights and interests have joined with other forces opposing international adoption. This article argues that effective child advocacy is a challenge, given that infants and young children are unable to voice their views or promote their interests, and the related risks that adults will use children to further various adult agendas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Interests of the Child in Intercountry Adoption: a Constructivist and Comparative Account
    Title Page Title: The Best Interests of the Child in Intercountry Adoption: A Constructivist and Comparative Account Author: Sarah Sargent This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of a PhD degree in Law The degree is awarded by De Montfort University Submitted October 2009 Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures i Acknowledgements ii Abstract iii Chapter One- The Best Interests of the Child in Intercountry Adoption: Introduction to a Comparative and Constructivist Research Project Introduction 1 Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption 2 2005 Special Session and Guide To Good Practice 3 Child Welfare and Intercountry Adoption 8 New Ways of Looking at Intercountry Adoption: A Review of Literature 13 Feminism 14 Post-Colonialism 16 Empirical Research 19 The Voice of Those Adopted Through Intercountry Adoption 24 Normative Meaning and Normative Usage of the Best Interests Standard 25 In Intercountry Adoption Constructivism 26 Overview of Constructivism in International Relations 29 International Relations ‘Collateral Benefits’ of Intercountry Adoption Engagement ? 30 International law and International Relations 33 Network Theory 37 Conclusion 39 Chapter Two- Constructivist Methodology: Empirical Analysis and Comparative Legal Analysis Introduction 41 Statement on Ethics Approval 41 Methodology Used: Overview 42 Selecting a Paradigm 43 Research Paradigms 44 Positivistic Paradigms and Constructivist Paradigms 44 Selecting a Paradigm for Legal Research 45 Positive Law 46 The Place of Empirical Legal Research: A Pandora’s Box? 47
    [Show full text]