Subordinate Rule Making

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Subordinate Rule Making Subordinate Rule Making - of Acts giving the power to make delegated An Historical Perspective legislation - the earliest of those being the Statute of Sewers made in 1531. This gave the Commis- ME Stephen Bourke sioners of the Sewers power to impose rates on Principal Legal Officer land owners and to distrain and impose penalties Adminisnative Review Council for non-payment. The Statute of Proclamations in 1539 is one Any system of rule making can be thought of of the most striking instances where an Act sets as a means to impose a set of values over the way out the power to make delegated legislation, in a society conducts its activities. In England and this case in the widest possible terms. The Australia, as with other Western common law Statute required 'that Proclamations made by the countries, those values emerge as democratic King shallbeobeyed'. It empowered Henry VIII, principles where the rule of law is dominant. with the advice of his Council, Separation of powers is entrenched in the 'to set forth proclamations under such penal- Australian Constitution. But history shows that ties and pains and of such sort as to His the law making function has been practised by Majesty and his said Council should seem the Crown (now the Executive) as well as the necessary and requisite, the said proclamations Parliament. to be obeyed, observed and kept as though Delegating legislative power to the Executive they were made by Act of Parliament unless has not been without its difficulties given the the King's Highness dispense with any of hstinct constitutional roles of Parliament and them under his great seal'. the Executive. Nevertheless responsible gov- ernment sees the executive in control of at least The Act also provided that Sheriffs or other one of the Houses of Parliament. An examina- officers were required, within fourteen days, to tion of the history of subordinate rule making proclaim HisMajesty 'sproclamations in market- provides an important perspective for any future towns, other towns or villages and post them up reform. 'openly upon places convenient therein'. This statute is therefore not only an early example of Early Delegated Legislatio fi in delegated legislation but alsoa form of statutory England rules publication. This was not, however, Henry VIII's only use While there are instances of the making of of delegatedlegislation. Section 59 of thestatute delegated legislation dating back to the 14th and of Wales, made in 1542, empowered the King to 15th centuries,itwasonly comparativelymently 'alter the laws of Wales and to make laws and that delegated legislation became a popular ordinances for Wales, such alterations and new method of rule making. The Committee on laws and ordinances to be published under the Minister's Powers (The Donoughmore Can- great seal and to be as of good strength, virtue mittee) cited an enactment made in 1385 con- and qffect as if made by the authority of Par- cerning the staple as the earliest example of' an liament' (emphasisadded) So it is that a clause in Act allowing the making of delegated legisla- an Act that provides apower to amend either that tion. Act or another Act by delegated legislation is The staple consisted of four products - wool, termed a 'Henry VIII' clause. leather, tin and lead - and the marketing was Other instances of use of the power to make regulated by the Statute of the Staple. Merchants, delegated legislation can be found through to the known as Staplers, had a monopoly in the staple nineteenth century, but its frequency certainly and the mayors of towns from where the staple diminished after the reign of Henry VIII. was exported held Staple Courts. However, the The industrial revolution saw the emergence Statute of the Staple is on the Rolls of Parlia- of an increasingly complex society. The regula- ment, not in the statute book. It gave the King tion of the activities of citizens required more power to determine the places where the staple detailed rules to cope with rhe complexities of could be held, the time of commencement, and life and also required more time to make those the form and method of execution. rules. The reign of Henry VIII had many instances English statute law at the beginning of the , nineteenth century often made extensive refer- before commencement. Orders of the House of m ence to regulations. The regulations were not Commons were outside its jurisdiction. made by a delegate of Parliament, but were The next significant event was the release of contained within the Act itself. Unlike the the report by the Donoughmore Committee on #m standard division today (important matters of Minister's Powers in 1932. The Committee was principle are contained in the Act and adminis- hastily appointed after the release of The New trative detail in the regulations), the statutes Despotism in 1929by the then Lordchief Justice passed by Parliament during the nineteenth of England, Lord Hewart. This book was a century dealt with matters of great detail. For forthright attack on delegation to the Executive example, the statute regulating cotton mills which Lord Hewart attributed to a bureacratic covered matters such as the age of employees in conspiracy. The Committee reported that it the mills, hours of work and times for breakfast could not find any evidence to support the alle- and a time for dinner. gations of conspiracy and stated that the process However, delegated legislation was still oc- of government would quickly come to a halt if all casionally used. The Poor Law Amendment Act laws had to be made by Parliament. Neverthe- 1834 (Imp) empowered the Poor Law Commis- less it recommended establishing a new standing sioners to make regulations for the management committee of the House of Commons 'to consider of the poor. It gave the Commissioners very and report on ... every regulation and rule made wide powers in carrying out their function to in the exercise of delegated legislative power, those who were 'deserving' of assistance - a far and laid before the House in pursuance of statu- cry from today's Social Security Act. tory requirement'. The way rules were made began to change as The recommendation was not acted on at that Parliament could no longer devote the time re- time and there seems to have been, at least prior quired to making the detailed rules necessary to to World War 11, little parliamentary interest in govern. Increasingly Parliament delegated to the scrutiny of delegated legislation. Indeed, a the executive the function of working out the motion put to the House of Commons on January delails. 27, 1937 'that in the opinion of this House, the Instances of delegating legislative authority power of the Executive has increased, is increas- to the Executive in England increased through- ing and ought to be diminished' failed for lack of out the nineteenth century, but with the onset of a quorum. It was not until 1943 that the House World War I, delegated rule making became far of Commons established the first Select Com- more common. mittee on Statutory Instruments and until 1973 As the trend through the nineteenth century that both Houses of Parliament in the United saw a greater use of delegated legislation as a Kingdom established ajoint scrutiny committee. method of rule making in the United Kingdom, The Rules Publication Act 1893 remained the it also revealed a greater need for an efficient only statutory requirement for the publication of mechanism to scrutinise this form of law mak- delegated legislation in the United Kingdom ing. In 1893 the Rules Publication Act was until 1946 when the Statutory Instruments Act passed imposing a requirement for advance pub- was passed. That Act required publication and licity. A notice of a proposal to make rules had tabling and permitted disallowance of certain to be published at least 40 days before the mak- instruments. ing of the rule and a notice where copies of the proposed rule were available was also required. The Use of Delegated Legislation in Publication was to be in the London Gazette. Colonial Australia The Act also allowed representations or sugges- tions to be made in writing and any such sugges- As New South Wales was made part of the tions or representations had to be taken into British Empire by occupation rather than by account. conquest or cession, so the law in force from the There was also a measure of scrutiny by the timeof colonisation was thelaw of England. The Committees of Parliament. The Special Orders New South Wales Statute of 1787 stated that it Committee of the House of Lords was estab- might be necessary to establish a colony, a civil lished in 1925. Its scrutiny was confined to Government and a court of criminaljurisdiction. orders which required Parliamentary approval New South Wales was subsequently made as a place for the transportation of convicts by two later that the British Law Officers declared that Orders-in-Council under that Statute Macquarie had been acting illegally in attempt- Copies of the Governor's orders and regula- ing to establish the Bankof New South Wales by tions were sent to theunited Kingdom Secretary Charter. of State. The Historical Records of Australia The English Parliament next acted in 1823 by report that "the Governor assumed powers of passing the New South Wales Act. This author- legislation, uncontrolled and entirely on his own ised the King to grant charters of justice for New initiative, as great as those which are the pre- South Wales and Van Dieman's Land, to extend rogative of Parliament and greater than those of the right to jury trial by Order-in-Council, to the King".
Recommended publications
  • 'LAW MERCHANT' and the FAIR COURT of ST. IVES, 1270-1324 By
    THE ‘LAW MERCHANT’ AND THE FAIR COURT OF ST. IVES, 1270-1324 by Stephen Edward Sachs This thesis has since been revised for publication. The updated version may be cited as: Stephen E. Sachs, From St. Ives to Cyberspace: The Modern Distortion of the Medieval ‘Law Merchant,’ 21 AM. U. INT’L L. REV. (2006). An electronic copy of the revised version is available at: http://ssrn.com/id=830265 © 2002 Stephen E. Sachs THE ‘LAW MERCHANT’ AND THE FAIR COURT OF ST. IVES, 1270-1324 by Stephen Edward Sachs A thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts 21 March 2002 © 2002 Stephen E. Sachs TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..........................................................................................................i Abbreviations................................................................................................................ iii Chapter I: Introduction ...................................................................................................1 Chapter II: Who Rules the Fair? Authority Over a “Merchant Court” ............................9 Chapter III: One Law Merchant, or Several? ................................................................50 Chapter IV: Merchant Law and Politics........................................................................98 Epilogue: Lex Mercatoria and Lex Cyberspace...........................................................119 Bibliography ...............................................................................................................125
    [Show full text]
  • CREATING an AMERICAN PROPERTY LAW: ALIENABILITY and ITS LIMITS in AMERICAN HISTORY Claire Priest
    CREATING AN AMERICAN PROPERTY LAW: ALIENABILITY AND ITS LIMITS IN AMERICAN HISTORY Claire Priest Contact Information: Northwestern University School of Law 357 East Chicago Ave. Chicago, IL 60611 Phone: (312) 503-4470 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements: ∗Associate Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law. B.A., J.D., Ph.D. Yale University. I would like to thank James McMasters of Northwestern’s Law Library for his help in finding copies of many of the primary sources used to write this Article. For extremely valuable comments and suggestions, I would like to thank Bernard Bailyn, Stuart Banner, Kenworthey Bilz, Charlotte Crane, David Dana, Michele Landis Dauber, Christine Desan, Tony A. Freyer, Morton J. Horwitz, Daniel Hulsebosch, Stanley N. Katz, Daniel M. Klerman, Naomi Lamoreaux, Charles W. McCurdy, Edmund S. Morgan, Janice Nadler, Sarah Pearsall, Dylan Penningroth, George L. Priest, Richard J. Ross, Emma Rothschild, Dhananjai Shivakumar, Kenneth L. Sokoloff, Vicky Saker Woeste, Gavin Wright and the seminar participants at Northwestern University School of Law’s Faculty Workshop, Stanford Law School’s Faculty Workshop, UCLA’s Legal History Colloquium and Economic History Workshop, NYU’s Legal History Colloquium, the University of Florida Fredric G. Levin College of Law’s Faculty Workshop, the Chicago Legal History Seminar, the American Society for Legal History’s Annual Meeting, the University of Illinois College of Law’s Faculty Workshop, the Omohundro Institute of Early American History’s Annual Conference, and Harvard University’s Conference on Atlantic Legalities. The Julius Rosenthal Fund at Northwestern University School of Law provided generous research support. CREATING AN AMERICAN PROPERTY LAW: ALIENABILITY AND ITS LIMITS IN AMERICAN HISTORY This Article analyzes an issue central to the economic and political development of the early United States: laws protecting real property from the claims of creditors.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolishing the Doctrine of Consideration - the Story of the Arra- Part 2
    ilr.ccsenet.org International Law Research Vol. 7, No. 1; 2018 Abolishing the Doctrine of Consideration - The Story of the Arra- Part 2 Graham McBain1,2 1 Peterhouse, Cambridge, UK 2 Harvard Law School, USA Correspondence: Graham McBain, 21 Millmead Terrace, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4AT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received: December 26, 2017 Accepted: January 16, 2018 Online Published: February 10, 2018 doi:10.5539/ilr.v7n1p95 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v7n1p95 20. PLOWDEN (1565) Sharington v Strotton (1565)1 concerned the conveyance of land by use by the owner to his brother and heirs, reserving a life interest (a liferent).The case was reported by Plowden and much use of the word 'consideration' was made of - albeit, it should be noted that Plowden's reports were published in Law French in 1571 and translated in 1761. The case arose on a bill of trespass against Strotton and others for taking timber without authority from land subject to a use (a trust) contained in a deed. The crucial issue was whether the use was valid. Counsel for the P's (Fleetwood and Wray) argued that the use was invalid since there was no consideration. Plowden (appearing for the D's with Bromley - he described himself as an 'apprentice of the Middle Temple') argued that the use was valid since a deed 'imported consideration' 2 - a proposition of law accepted by later courts and one which still prevails today (the actual case held that natural love and affection was sufficient consideration but this was soon reversed).3 So, what was consideration ? And, why was natural love and affection treated as, in effect, having a money value (being a good price) ? (a) Use of the Word 'Consideration' The word 'consideration' was used extensively in the case report.
    [Show full text]
  • Jury Service in Victoria
    LAW REFORM COMMITTEE Jury Service in Victoria FINAL REPORT Volume 3 DECEMBER 1997 LOAN COPY (PLEASE RETURN TO THE PROCEDURE OFFICE) PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA LAW REFORM COMMITTEE Jury Service in Victoria FINAL REPORT VOLUME 3 REPORT ON RESEARCH PROJECTS Ordered to be Printed Melbourne Government Printer December 1997 76 Session 1996-97 COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP CHAIRMAN Mr Victor Perton, MP DEPUTY CHAIR Mr Neil Cole, MP MEMBERS Mr Florian Andrighetto, MP Hon Carlo Furletti, MLC Hon Monica Gould, MLC Mr Peter Loney, MP Mr Noel Maughan, MP Mr Allster Paterson, MP Mr John Thwaites, MP The Committee's address is — Level 8, 35 Spring Street MELBOURNE VICTORL\ 3000 Telephone inquiries — (03) 9651 3644 Facsimile — (03) 96513674 Email — [email protected] Internet— http : / / www^. vicnet.net.au / -lawref ui Jury Service in Victoria—Final Report: Volume 3 COMMITTEE STAFF EXECUTIVE OFFICER and DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH Mr Douglas Trapnell RESEARCH OFFICERS Mr Mark Cowie (until 10 November 1995) Ms Padma Raman (from 3 March 1997) Ms Rebecca Waechter (until 18 November 1997) ADDITIONAL RESEARCH ASSISTANCE Ms Angelene Falk OFFICE MANAGERS Mrs Rhonda MacMahon (until 18 October 1996) Ms Lyn Petersen (from 2 December 1996 to 1 June 1997) Ms Angelica Vergara (from 11 August 1997) Jury Service in Victoria—Final Report: Volume 3 CONTENTS Committee Membership iii Committee Staff v Functions of the Committee xi Terms of Reference xiii INTRODUCTION 1 1 HISTORY 3 Section 1: The Jurisprudential Rationale for the Jury as an Institution Within the Civil and Criminal System
    [Show full text]
  • Magna Carta Commemoration Essays [1917]
    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. Henry Elliot Malden, Magna Carta Commemoration Essays [1917] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Law Reform Committee
    LAW REFORM COMMITTEE Jury Service in Victoria FINAL REPORT Volume 3 DECEMBER 1997 PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA LAW REFORM COMMITTEE Jury Service in Victoria FINAL REPORT VOLUME 3 REPORT ON RESEARCH PROJECTS Ordered to be Printed Melbourne Government Printer December 1997 N° 76 Session 1996–97 COMMITTEE M EMBERS CHAIRMAN Mr Victor Perton, MP DEPUTY CHAIR Mr Neil Cole, MP MEMBERS Mr Florian Andrighetto, MP Hon Carlo Furletti, MLC Hon Monica Gould, MLC Mr Peter Loney, MP Mr Noel Maughan, MP Mr Alister Paterson, MP Mr John Thwaites, MP The Committee's address is — Level 8, 35 Spring Street MELBOURNE VICTORIA 3000 Telephone inquiries — (03) 9651 3644 Facsimile — (03) 9651 3674 Email — [email protected] Internet— http://www.vicnet.net.au/~lawref COMMITTEE S TAFF EXECUTIVE OFFICER and DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH Mr Douglas Trapnell RESEARCH OFFICERS Mr Mark Cowie (until 10 November 1995) Ms Padma Raman (from 3 March 1997) Ms Rebecca Waechter (until 18 November 1997) ADDITIONAL RESEARCH ASSISTANCE Ms Angelene Falk OFFICE MANAGERS Mrs Rhonda MacMahon (until 18 October 1996) Ms Lyn Petersen (from 2 December 1996 to 1 June 1997) Ms Angelica Vergara (from 11 August 1997) CONTENTS Committee Membership ........................................................................................................ iii Committee Staff ......................................................................................................................v Functions of the Committee...................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Peter Stringham, Fayetteville State University Todd J. Zywicki
    RIVALRY AND SUPERIOR DISPATCH: AN ANALYSIS OF COMPETING COURTS IN MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN ENGLAND Edward Peter Stringham, Fayetteville State University Todd J. Zywicki, George Mason University School of Law George Mason University Law and Economics Research Paper Series 10-57 This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network at http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=1703598 Rivalry and superior dispatch: An analysis of competing courts in medieval and early modern England Edward Peter Stringham 910‐672‐1837 [email protected] Lloyd V. Hackley Endowed Chair of Capitalism and Free Enterprise Studies School of Business and Economics, Fayetteville State University, Fayetteville, NC Todd J. Zywicki 703‐993‐8091 [email protected] George Mason University Foundation Professor of Law George Mason University School of Law, 3301 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA ABSTRACT In most areas, economists look to competition to align incentives, but not so with courts. Many believe that competition enables plaintiff forum shopping, but Adam Smith praised rivalry among courts. This article describes the courts when the common law developed. In many areas of law, courts were monopolized and imposed decisions on unwilling participants. In other areas, however, large degrees of competition and consent were present. In many areas, local, hundred, manorial, county, ecclesiastical, law merchant, chancery, and common law courts competed for customers. When parties had a choice, courts needed to provide a forum that was ex ante value maximizing. JEL Codes: K40, N43, P48 Keywords: efficiency of common law, legal history, monopolization of law 1 “Another thing which tended to support the liberty of the people and render the proceedings in the courts very exact, was the rivalship which arose betwixt them.” – Adam Smith (1776: 280) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Early-Tudor England and the Growth of a Cred!T Culture
    A COUNTRY UNDER CONTRACT: EARLY-TUDOR ENGLAND AND THE GROWTH OF A CRED!T CULTURE Mark R. Horowitz, PhD, FRH1stS Department of History, University of Illinois (Chicago) The historical explanations for the development of modern English credit and finance often overlook the late-medieval period, favoring instead a late fruition by focusing on economic growth in late-Tudor and Stuart England and the anticipation of the founding of the Bank of England in 1694. Moreover, European practices regularly dominate the discussion to show both borrowing and influence, especially from the Italian city- states. However, England developed methods of credit and business transactions through the use of written obligations long before Continental financial instruments, and they permeated all aspects of English law, administration and finance. This paper provides an overview of how a bottom-up system developed and expanded through English common and statutory law and ultimately became the main form of statecraft for the first Tudor king, Henry VII (d. 1509). Henry’s success in business, finance and the prosecution of the law stemmed from his recognition that upon acquiring the throne of England he now ruled a country under contract among private parties, public courts and a developing centralized government. Beginning in the late 12th century, the European economy underwent rapid changes for reasons that are not completely understood. Both markets and production expanded, along with the parallel development of urban centers. Financial instruments facilitated
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to English Economic History and Theory, Volume 2
    An Introduction to English Economic History and Theory Sir William Ashley Ph.D., M.A., M.Com. Professor of Commerce in the University of Birmingham; Late Professor of Economic History in Harvard University; Sometime Fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford Part II: The End of the Middle Ages First Edition 1893. Second Edition 1893 Fourth Edition 1906 Contents Preface to the Fourth Edition ................................................................................................................5 Book 2: From the Fourteenth to the Sixteenth Century........................................................................7 Chapter 1: The Supremacy of the Towns..............................................................................................8 Chapter 2: The Crafts .........................................................................................................................38 Chapter 3: The Woollen Industry ........................................................................................................95 Chapter 4: The Agrarian Revolution.................................................................................................128 Chapter 5: The Relief of the Poor .....................................................................................................151 Chapter 6: The Canonist Doctrine ....................................................................................................185 Preface to the Fourth Edition It has not been possible in the present edition to do more than make a few slight
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Goddard Credit and Trade in Later Medieval
    PALGRAVE STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF FINANCE CREDIT AND TRADE IN LATER MEDIEVAL ENGLAND, 1353–1532 RICHARD GODDARD Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance Series Editors D’Maris Coffman University College London, Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management United Kingdom Tony K. Moore University of Reading United Kingdom Martin Allen Fitzwilliam Museum of the University of Cambridge United Kingdom Sophus Reinert Harvard Business School USA Th e study of the history of fi nancial institutions, markets, instruments and concepts is vital if we are to understand the role played by fi nance today. At the same time, the methodologies developed by fi nance academ- ics can provide a new perspective for historical studies. Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance is a multi-disciplinary eff ort to emphasise the role played by fi nance in the past, and what lessons historical experiences have for us. It presents original research, in both authored monographs and edited collections, from historians, fi nance academics and econo- mists, as well as fi nancial practitioners. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/14583 Richard Goddard Credit and Trade in Later Medieval England, 1353–1532 Richard Goddard Department of History University of Nottingham United Kingdom Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance ISBN 978-1-137-48985-2 ISBN 978-1-137-48987-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-48987-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016936092 © Th e Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th e Author(s) 2016 Th e author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identifi ed as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genealogy of Native Title
    THINKING JURISDICTIONALLY: A GENEALOGY OF NATIVE TITLE SHAUNNAGH DORSETT A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Shaunnagh Dorsett 2005 Abstract In Mabo v. State of Queensland (No. 2) (1992) 175 C.L.R. 1, the majority of the High Court held that ‘native title’ had survived the acquisition of sovereignty over the Australian continent and is ‘recognised’ by the common law. However, all the judgments failed to articulate clearly either the nature of native title as a legal form, and the relationship of that legal form to the common law, or what is meant by ‘recognition’. Twelve years later the High Court has still not provided a satisfactory understanding of any of these matters. The central problem investigated by this thesis is the nature of that relationship and of the legal interest of native title. It is contended that this relationship can be understood and ordered as a matter of jurisdiction. This thesis seeks to recuperate a substantive concept of jurisdiction, and specifically of a particular jurisdiction, that of the common law, and to demonstrate how the interest of native title results from the jurisdictional relationship between common law and indigenous law. Part I is a genealogy of native title, drawn out through a history of ideas about common law jurisdiction. It is an account of the legal practice of jurisdiction, through a conceptual elaboration of a particular jurisdiction: the common law. This part traces the history of the common law from its origins in a pluralistic, fragmented, jurisdictional landscape, to its current position as the ‘law of the land’.
    [Show full text]
  • Utility of Indigenous Methods of Dispute Resolution in Intra-African Trade
    Utility of indigenous methods of dispute resolution in intra-African Trade LI Kometsi 25685996 Thesis submitted for the degree Doctoral Legum in Private Law at the North-West University Promoter: Prof W Erlank Co-promoter: Prof C Rautenbach Graduation October 2017 http://www.nwu.ac.za/ Abstract Africa's economic growth depends in part on the growth of intra-African trade. Intra-African trade is lower than trade between Africa and the world. A number of reforms, including legal reforms, have been undertaken, in Africa in order to boost economic growth in general. Most notably, the recent past has seen the introduction of the so-called alternative dispute resolution methods (ADR), featuring mediation as its predominant aspect, with the purpose to enhance the rule of law, which it is believed is important for attracting and retaining foreign direct investment. However, the imported mediation has failed, due in part to its irrelevance to the African cultures and traditions. The innovations could be made useful by adapting them to the cultural context of the African dispute resolution landscape on the one hand, and by reflecting on the indigenous methods of ADR on the other hand. In order to determine how the indigenous methods of ADR can be utilised this study takes an in-depth look at the relationship between law and economic development. The conclusion is that there is a causal relationship between law and development. However, this relationship does not augur well for intra-African trade. For the law to have a positive causal effect to development, it must be relevant.
    [Show full text]