2 Welcome

4 Deepening Understanding

Program in Ethics and Public Affairs, James A. Moffett ‘29 Lectures in Ethics, Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Ira W. DeCamp Bioethics Seminars, Political Philosophy Colloquium and Grants, Program in Law and Public Affairs

14 Fostering Collaboration

Workshops and Conferences, History of Political Thought Project, Democracy and Human Values Project, Co-sponsored Events

22 Teaching and Learning

Program in Values and Public Life, Student Prizes, Freshman Seminars, New Faculty: Marc Fleurbaey, Conference: Master Teachers in Action, Film Forum, Human Values Forum, Environmental Affairs Forum, Cross-listed Courses

40 Supporting Research

Visiting Fellows Seminar, Visiting Faculty and Fellows, Graduate Prize Fellows

48 People Director’s Welcome

When I started in this role three years ago, I thought its I will be on leave in 2012-13, as will Melissa Lane, director greatest perquisite was an office with a magical view of of the Program in Values and Public Life (VPL). We’ll be McCosh Walk. replaced by a Regime of Two Alans — Alan Patten, who will direct the center, and Alan Ryan, who will direct the VPL Today I still enjoy the view, but the main privilege of the program. I thank both for taking on these responsibilities. office is the proximity of so many gifted people. Chief among them are those responsible for the center’s intellectual life — our faculty members and executive committee. The list of accomplishments on the facing page should be evidence enough of their gifts, but it’s impossible to forbear from observing that this year two of our colleagues — Anthony Appiah and Peter Singer — were awarded among the most Charles Beitz eminent distinctions their governments can present. Director, University Center for Human Values, Then there are our Laurance S. Rockefeller visiting fellows, and Edwards S. Sanford Professor of Politics who bring a fresh vitality to Princeton every September. Their reports later in this Annual Review testify to this and to the deep bonds of interest that develop here.

Erin Rizk, who has supervised the center’s communications for the last few years and was mainly responsible for this publication, will have departed by the time you read this. We’ll all miss her, but we go on, thanks to Erum Syed, our assistant director, and her colleagues, who make the center the welcoming and productive place it is. 2011-12 Faculty Accomplishments

Peter Brooks Marc Fleurbaey Awarded the William Clyde DeVane Medal of the Yale University chapter Appointed coordinating lead chapter author for Intergovernmental Panel of Phi Beta Kappa for distinguished scholarship and teaching on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report (forthcoming, 2014)

Published “Enigmas of Identity” and edited “Anthologie du mélodrame Published “A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare” (co-authored classique” with F. Maniquet)

John Cooper Melissa Lane Delivered the Tanner Lectures on Human Values at Stanford University Awarded the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellowship

Published “Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy From Delivered the Saul O Sidore Memorial Lecture at the University of Socrates to Plotinus” New Hampshire

Published “Eco-Republic: What the Ancients Can Teach Us About Ethics, Virtue and Sustainable Living”

Stephen Macedo Appiah, Singer win national distinctions Delivered the 11th Annual Walter F. Murphy Lecture in American Constitutionalism at Princeton University Two members of the center’s faculty were awarded civic honors earlier this year. Jan-Werner Mueller Published “Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in 20th-century Europe” Kwame Anthony Appiah, the Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Philosophy and the University Center Philip Pettit for Human Values, was presented with the National Delivered the Frankfurt Lectures at Goethe University in Frankfurt and the Humanities Medal by President Barack Obama in a White Wittgenstein Lectures at the University of Bayreuth, and gave inaugural House ceremony on Feb. 13. The medal honors those Quain Lecture in Jurisprudence at University College London whose work has deepened the nation’s understanding of and engagement with the humanities, or helped Published “Group Agency: The Possibility, Design and Status of Corporate preserve and expand access to important resources in Agents” (co-authored with former center fellow Christian List) the humanities. Kim Lane Scheppele Peter Singer, the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics in Named an associate member of the International Academy of the center, was appointed Companion in the General Comparative Law Division of the Order of Australia — the country’s highest civic honor — “for eminent service to philosophy and Delivered the Rosenthal Lectures at Northwestern University School of Law bioethics as a leader of public debate and communicator of ideas in the areas of global poverty, animal welfare and the human condition.” He was among eight people Peter Singer announced as recipients of the honor on June 11, as part “Animal Liberation” (1975) included in Time Magazine’s list of 100 Best of the Queen’s Birthday celebration. Nonfiction Books published since 1923 4 DEEPENING UNDERSTANDING

Was Gandhi a realist? By Pablo Gilabert, Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Fellow

As part of the Program in Ethics and Public Affairs series, Karuna fulfi llment at reasonable cost feasible or infeasible. However, I Mantena’s Feb. 9 talk, “Another Realism: The Politics of Gandhian found Mantena’s version of political realism quite illuminating Nonviolence,” dealt with an emerging trend in political philosophy and plausible. — the dissatisfaction with “ideal” or “moralistic” theories that focus on identifying fundamental normative principles or pictures of a She directly and forcefully responded to the most serious charge perfectly just society without illuminating how we could feasibly against “realistic” approaches. The challenge is that political realism achieve them. Instead, some writers advocate “realistic” approaches is too conservative, that it takes the status quo for granted and that focus on responding to immediate problems and do not lose that it fails to uncover injustices we could and should criticize and sight of how power and confl ict shape the possibilities of action in overcome. In the paper that formed the basis for the talk, Mantena real political life. I am skeptical about the hard dichotomy between explored the possibility of a form of political realism that is not “political moralism” and “political realism” that many advocates of conservative but transformative. Her model was Gandhi’s political realism presuppose. It seems to me that any serious commitment theory and practice. Gandhi’s understanding of nonviolent action to ambitious moral goals is naturally coupled with an interest in has been seen by some as a case of political moralism. But Mantena uncovering the features of the real world that may render their argued that this account in fact involves a hardnosed realism that

At left, clockwise from top: Former graduate prize fellow Alex Levitov, visiting fellow Pablo Gilabert, and former graduate prize fellow Brookes Brown. At right, Karuna Mantena, Yale University Deepening Understanding 5

Karuna Mantena’s Feb. 9 PEPA talk, “Another Realism: The Politics of Gandhian Nonviolence” is attuned to dangerous psychological tendencies to violence and Program in Ethics and Public Affairs Seminars domination. Furthermore, Gandhi’s realism is transformative: It The Program in Ethics and Public Affairs (PEPA) advances the study of responds to the dangerous features of the political world it uncovers the moral purposes and foundations of institutions and practices, both by recommending forms of action that involve quite serious domestic and international. PEPA seminars seek to bring the perspectives of departures from the status quo. moral and political philosophy to bear on signifi cant issues in public affairs. September 22 Gandhi’s politics of nonviolence, Mantena argued, is one in which “The Normativity of Law” nonviolent actors adopt a discipline of self-examination, restraint, Liam Murphy, New York University and humility that interrupts common dynamics of hostile self- October 27 assertion and escalation of confl ict and, importantly, leads to “The Importance of What People Care About” selecting effi cacious means of political change that anticipate rather Marc Fleurbaey, Princeton University than subvert the noble ends agents seek to realize. Both “realists” December 1 and “moralists” could learn from Mantena’s rich exploration of what “Democratic Holy Wars: Democracy, Intervention and Self-defense” she called “the conditions for effective and principled action.” Christopher Kutz, University of California, Berkeley February 9 “Another Realism: The Politics of Gandhian Nonviolence” Karuna Mantena, Yale University

March 29 “What’s Wrong With Colonialism” Lea Ypi, London School of Economics 6 Deepening Understanding

Is waging war a right? By Kim Lane Scheppele, Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Sociology and International Affairs and the University Center for Human Values

We didn’t expect Seyla Benhabib to like Carl Schmitt, but her Fortunately, now it is possible to do what Benhabib promises to critique was nonetheless surprising. Benhabib chose to take up do in her new book — develop a theory of international relations Schmitt’s under-studied “Nomos of the Earth,” in which, according that puts both human rights and the ban on aggressive war at the to Benhabib, Schmitt rejected Kant and saw international relations center, and tie both to a vision of democratic politics. Those who as the space of pure power, where the hegemon can dictate the are curious to learn more about Benhabib’s critique of Schmitt will order of the earth. Unlike Kant, who believed that the dignity of find this paper published in Political Theory next year. man constituted a limit on what states could do, Schmitt recognized no such limits and believed that waging war was a right that states Clockwise from below: Seyla could invoke whenever their self-preservation was threatened. It’s Benhabib, Yale University; not a pretty picture, and Benhabib rightly attacks it. Paul Sigmund, politics; and Alex Guerrero (left), University of Pennsylvania, and Kim In my view, “Nomos of the Earth” is not one of Schmitt’s better Lane Scheppele, sociology, Woodrow Wilson School of books. At the time the book was published in 1950, the Universal Public and International Affairs, Declaration of Human Rights was only two years old. The war and University Center for Human Values crimes tribunals in Nuremberg and Tokyo were still controversial even among rights-defending liberal lawyers for the reasons Schmitt suggests — they used law created after the fact and procedures that disadvantaged the defense. It gives Schmitt too much credit to believe he is doing particularly profound theory in this book. Instead, he described international law as it existed when he wrote.

If that’s true, then Benhabib reads “Nomos of the Earth” rather more contentiously than she needs to. She sees Schmitt not as an old-fashioned international lawyer whose view was fortunately on the losing side of history but as an ex-Nazi whose lack of respect for human rights has a darker foundation. A better theorist — and perhaps a better person — than Schmitt would have seen the glimmers of a new vision of international law on the horizon in 1950. But a plodding lawyer would not have — and that is what “Nomos” reflects to me. Deepening Understanding 7

James A. Moffett ’29 Lectures in Ethics James A. Moffett ’29 Lectures in Ethics

The James A. Moffett ’29 Lectures in Ethics series aims to foster Carl Schmitt’s refl ection about moral issues in public life, broadly construed, at either a theoretical or a practical level, and in the history of thought about these issues. The series is made possible by a gift from the Critique of Kant: Whitehall Foundation in honor of James A. Moffett ’29. Sovereignty and December 8 “Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Kant: Sovereignty and International Law” International Seyla Benhabib, Yale University February 23 Law “Borders and Human Rights” David Miller, University of Oxford

James A. Moffett ’29 Lectures in Ethics Borders and Seyla Benhabib Human Eugene Meyer Professor of Political Science and Philosophy, Yale University Rights 4:30 to 6 p.m. Thursday, December 8, 2011

McCormick Hall, Room 101 A reception will follow

David Miller

Produced by the Office of Communications 26261-12 Copyright © 2011 by The Trustees of Princeton University Professor of Political Theory Nuffield College, University of Oxford

4:30 to 6 p.m. Thursday, February 23, 2012

McCormick Hall, Room 101 A reception will follow

printed on recycled paper Produced by the Office of Communications 26558PS-12 Copyright © 2012 by The Trustees of Princeton University 8 Deepening Understanding

What does Shakespeare mean to us today? By William Evans, Department of English, Graduate Prize Fellow

In his 2012 Tanner Lectures on Human Values, March 14 and 15, I was still struck by the rare pleasure of having people from the Stephen Greenblatt drew powerful connections between the vitality town and from all the University’s major disciplines in the same hall, of Shakespeare’s characters and attempts by anthropologists and listening to the same talk, engaged in one conversation. evolutionary biologists to understand life stories. In the first lecture, he canvassed Shakespeare’s oeuvre to sketch some preliminary ideas It wasn’t until after the lecture that I became fully conscious of of what a Shakespearean life story might mean. He demonstrated the subtlety of Greenblatt’s achievement. By bringing Shakespeare that for Shakespeare and his characters, life stories always involve into the company of history, anthropology and evolutionary biology a trade-off: We leave vestiges of ourselves, but what we leave is not with easy elegance and eloquence, he answered one of the pressing ultimately subject to our control. He found suggestive resemblances questions in the academy: How can the humanities and the in “life history theory” in evolutionary biology — the theory, to put traditional tools of literary criticism be relevant in the new century? it roughly, that the life history of a species is essentially fixed by the Greenblatt offered solutions without even bringing up the problem. struggle for reproductive fitness. In the second lecture, he focused Here were lectures that provoked interest not just from a student on the problem science has with accounting with senescence, the of Renaissance literature such as myself, but also from a scientist period between the end of our reproductive power and death; this like Princeton President Shirley M. Tilghman. Vocabularies change, inexplicable gap, he argued, is the raw material of one of the greatest disciplines and cultures evolve, Greenblatt suggested, but some of all Shakespeare’s tragedies, “King Lear.” questions never go away, and we will probably never find a better laboratory for them than the works of Shakespeare. The lectures attracted an admirably broad audience. Along with literary critics, there were philosophers, political theorists and scientists, all of whom added their voices to the discussion. I spotted more than a few community auditors. Princeton is a relatively intimate community for a research university of its distinction, but

At left, Harvard University’s Stephen Greenblatt with Princeton President Shirley M. Tilghman. Above, from left, Alexander Nehamas, philosophy and comparative literature, with Colin Burrow, University of Oxford, and Margreta de Grazia, University of Pennsylvania. At right, Stephen Greenblatt (left) and Philip Pettit, politics and University Center for Human Values Deepening Understanding 9

Tanner Lectures on Human Values SHAKESPEARE AND THE SHAPE OF A LIFE

Clockwise from above: Tanner lecturer and discussants; Jeff Stephen Dolven, English Greenblatt John Cogan University Professor of the Humanities, Harvard University

Tanner Lectures on Human Values Lecture 1: McCormick Hall, Room 101 March 14, 2012, 4:30–6:30 p.m. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values are presented annually at a Shakespeare and the Uses of Life Stories select list of universities around the world. The center serves as host to these lectures at Princeton, in which an eminent scholar from philosophy, Lecture 2: McCormick Hall, Room 101 religion, the humanities, sciences, creative arts or learned professions, or March 15, 2012, 4:30–6:30 p.m. a person eminent in political or social life, is invited to present a series of Shakespeare and the End of Life Stories lectures refl ecting upon scholarly and scientifi c learning relating to “the entire range of values pertinent to the human condition.” A reception at Prospect House will follow each lecture. March 14 “Shakespeare and the Shape of a Life: Shakespeare and the Uses of Life Stories” Stephen Greenblatt, Harvard University Commentators: Colin Burrow, University of Oxford; Adam Phillips, essayist

March 15 “Shakespeare and the Shape of a Life: Shakespeare and the End of Life Stories”

Produced by the Of ce of Communications 26281PS Copyright © 2012 by The Trustees of Princeton University Printed on recycled paper In the Nation’s Service and in the Service of All Nations Stephen Greenblatt, Harvard University Commentators: Margreta de Grazia, University of Pennsylvania; Jeff Dolven, Princeton University 10 Deepening Understanding

Ira W. DeCamp Bioethics Seminars

The Ira W. DeCamp Bioethics Seminars range across a wide variety of December 7 topics at the intersections of philosophy, ecology, biology, medicine and “Strategy Consequentialism and Neuroscience” public policy. The seminar series is made possible by a grant from the Ira W. Joanna Burch-Brown, University of Oxford DeCamp Foundation. March 30 September 21 “One Child: Do We Really Have the Right to More?” “The Case for Banning Cigarettes” Sarah Conly, Bowdoin College Robert Proctor, Stanford University April 11 October 12 “Out of Bounds? A Critique of the New Policies on “Brain Scans in the Courtroom: Rethinking the Threat” Hyperandrogenism and Elite Female Athletes” Adina Roskies, Dartmouth College and Katrina Karkazis, Stanford University Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Fellow May 9 November 9 “The Moral Magic of Uninformed Consent” “Debunking Evolutionary Debunking of Ethical Realism” Tom Dougherty, Stanford University William FitzPatrick, University of Rochester

November 15 “Climate Change and Equity: A View From China” Teng Fei, Tsinghua University, Beijing

Clockwise, from above: Visiting fellow Karl Schafer; Teng Fei, Tsignhua University; Charles Beitz, politics and University Center for Human Values; and Peter Singer, series director and University Center for Human Values Deepening Understanding 11

Political Philosophy Colloquium

The Program in Political Philosophy presents a colloquium for graduate students and faculty in which scholars from Princeton and elsewhere lead seminars on a broad range of topics of interest to the University’s political philosophy community. The University Center for Human Values and the Department of Politics co-sponsor the colloquium.

October 6 “Subdue the Senate: Machiavelli’s ‘Way of Freedom’ or Path to Tyranny?” John McCormick, University of Chicago

October 20 “Rule Over None: Social Equality and the Value of Democracy” Niko Kolodny, University of California, Berkeley

November 17 “The Early History of Liberalism: The Example of France” Helena Rosenblatt, City University of New York

March 1 “Persons and Bodies” Japa Pallikkathayil, New York University

April 12 “Reasons to Vote: A Response to Goldman Tuck” Colloquium director Philip Pettit, politics and University Geoffrey Brennan, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Center for Human Values

Political Philosophy Grants

Princeton’s Program in Political Philosophy and the University Center for Human Values award these grants to graduate students for research and travel related to research. They were created through an allocation of funds from an endowed account established by Amy Gutmann, the founding director of the center.

Megan Brankley, Department of History Teresa Davis, Department of History Raphael Krut-Landau, Department of Philosophy Kenneth Lamb, Department of Politics Christopher Ro, Department of Politics Daniel Wodak, Department of Philosophy 12 Deepening Understanding

Program in Law and Public Affairs

A packed Richardson Auditorium for the Oct. 10 event “The Court, the Constitution and the Justice From Illinois: John Paul Stevens in Conversation With Provost Christopher Eisgruber”

The University Center for Human Values is a co-sponsor of as occasional visitors drawn primarily from the academy, legal Princeton’s Program in Law and Public Affairs (LAPA), an practice and government. It sponsors a lively program of seminars, interdisciplinary initiative that supports research and teaching workshops and lectures that bring together faculty members, about the role of law in constituting politics, society, the economy graduate students and undergraduates with interests in the law in and culture. The program supports the study of law both in the all of its dimensions. Among this year’s highlights, LAPA brought present and over time, and not only in the United States, but also former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens to campus in in countries around the world and across national borders. Each October. LAPA’s director, Kim Lane Scheppele, is a joint faculty year, LAPA brings to Princeton a select group of fellows as well member of the center and a member of its executive committee. Deepening Understanding 13

2011-12 LAPA Fellows

Bernadette Atuahene, Assistant Professor of Law, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Illinois Institute of Technology; and Faculty Fellow, American Bar Foundation

Michael Herz, the Arthur Kaplan Professor of Law and Co-director of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University

Tayyab Mahmud, Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Global Justice, Seattle University School of Law

Michael McCann, the Gordon Hirabayashi Professor for the Advancement of Citizenship, University of Washington

Arzoo Osanloo, Associate Professor of Law, Societies and Justice, University of Washington LAPA staff, fellows and visitors for 2011-12

Camille Robcis, Assistant Professor of History, Cornell University

From left: Provost Christopher Eisgruber (left) and former Justice John Paul Stevens; an audience member asking questions of the former justice 14 FOSTERING COLLABORATION

Is learning to read ethical training? By Peter Brooks, Organizer, The Humanities in the Public Sphere symposium; Lecturer with the Rank of Professor in Comparative Literature and the University Center for Human Values

The symposium The Humanities in the Public Sphere, held April bad-faith, twisted interpretations without professional conscience 19 and 20, grew out of a seminar I have led for the past four years intervening to say: This is not right. Can we, then, claim there is a on “The Ethics of Reading” — a project that asked whether the more ethical path in textual interpretation? That was the claim to close, attentive reading fostered in the humanities can be said to be tested in the two-day symposium: That the discipline of reading represent or produce an ethics. It’s a subject that was pressed upon inculcated in the interpretive humanities may represent an ethical my attention in first reading the “torture memos” when they were practice that needs to take a larger place in other fields — very released from the Department of Justice. I wanted to claim that no much including professional training, such as law — and in the one rigorously trained in the analysis of poetry could engage in such public sphere.

Judging by audience interest and participation, the symposium was a great success. Judith Butler of the University of California, Berkeley, gave her keynote lecture, titled “Incredulous Ordinary: Toward a Literary Ethics for Public Life,” to an overflow audience in McCosh Hall, Room 46. The next day three panels, all in a packed bowl in Robertson Hall, addressed three issues: Is there an

Above, from left, Charles Larmore, Brown University; Elaine Scarry, Harvard University; and Anthony Appiah, philosophy and University Center for Human Values. Right, Peter Brooks, symposium organizer, comparative literature and University Center for Human Values. Far right, Victoria McGeer, University Center for Human Values Fostering Collaboration 15

The symposium The Humanities in the Public Sphere, featuring speakers from more than a dozen institutions ethics of reading?; the ethics of reading and the professions; and Workshops and Conferences the humanities and human rights. In each session, two speakers Throughout the year, the University Center for Human Values organizes presented brief position papers on which three respondents various academic events, from single lectures to major conferences, that commented, followed by general discussion. engage ethical issues in both private and public life.

December 15 What most impressed me was how well this noted group of scholars Normative Philosophy Speaker Series had done their homework. All the papers were new, fresh and on point. And by the end of the day we thrashed out a question February 15, March 16 and May 4 that needs new thinking. We agreed that we can’t say that reading Feminist Political Theory Speaker Series great books is going to make you a better person — that’s a April 6-7 sentimental claim that cannot stand. Nonetheless, the very practice Princeton Graduate Conference in Political Theory of reading itself, carried out with a careful regard for language and April 19-20 interpretation, can itself be an ethical practice. Ethics of Reading Symposium: The Humanities in the Public Sphere 16 Fostering Collaboration

When is a political movement populist? By Jan-Werner Mueller, Director, History of Political Thought Project; Professor of Politics

Above, from left, John McCormick, University of Chicago; Nadia Urbinati, Columbia University; Jason Frank, Cornell University; Jan-Werner Mueller, project director and politics; and Michael Kazin, Georgetown University.

“Populism” has become ubiquitous in political commentary. Some At left, Kim Lane Scheppele, sociology, Woodrow Wilson see it as one of the gravest dangers to liberal democracy; others School of Public and think it is a term applied by elites to discredit any resistance to International Affairs, and University Center for Human their projects by ordinary people; and others again want to give it Values. Below, graduate a positive connotation, based on progressive movements in U.S. student Benjamin Ewing, politics history. Can we say how we know whether something is populist or not — or do we just somehow know it when we see it? And what might be the implications for political theory more broadly?

As part of the History of Political Thought Project, a two-day workshop on Populism: Historical and Normative Aspects held Feb. 17 and 18 made headway both in understanding the history of Fostering Collaboration 17

populism in Europe and the Americas and in relating populism to History of Political Thought Project Workshops central questions in democratic theory. The two days saw a range of The History of Political Thought Project provides a venue for Princeton exceptionally lively debates, with historians, political scientists and students and faculty from different disciplines to discuss both substantive philosophers trying genuinely to engage each other. and methodological issues in the history of political thought and seeks to build bridges to comparative politics, comparative institutional law and area studies. The workshop had a distinctly comparative character, with a range of contributions focusing on Europe and Latin America. The November 17 former stressed that populist movements defending seemingly The Public Uses of History: Ethics, Education and Historical Consciousness liberal values — such as freedom and tolerance — against the February 17-18 supposed threats of Islamic radicalism are in fact just forms of Populism: Historical and Normative Aspects nationalism. Populism and xenophobia are not the same thing April 27-29 — the former, according to Dutch political scientist Cas Mudde, The Concept of Ideology Revisited: Origins, Theories, Lived Experience, is always about an allegedly pure people confronting a corrupt Political Consequences elite; the latter might or might not be part of the populist political imagination.

Presenters on Latin America stressed the long-standing traditions of populism on the continent but also emphasized the differences between leaders who today are often lumped together as populists. Yet, as Mexican historian Enrique Krauze underlined, there are still good reasons for thinking that generalizations about Latin American populism are possible.

In the end, no single defi nition of populism emerged as triumphant, and there were few takers for the idea that populism ought to be central for progressive movements today. But everyone found both their knowledge of history and contemporary movements as well as the conceptual framework they bring to understanding them signifi cantly expanded and refi ned.

John McCormick, University of Chicago 18 Fostering Collaboration

Where does cooperation come from? By Stephen Macedo, Workshop Co-organizer, Democracy and Human Values Project; Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Politics and the University Center for Human Values

on these questions from a variety of standpoints. Steven Pinker (psychology, Harvard University) spoke on the long-term decline of violence; Robert Kurzban (psychology, University of Pennsylvania) summarized recent work relating to evolutionary psychology, cooperation and morality; Robert Sugden (economics, University of East Anglia) provided economic and game theoretic perspectives on cooperation and law; Scott Shapiro (law, Yale University) presented work on the planning and coordination theory of law; and, in a final session, Gillian Hadfield (law and economics, University of Southern California) and I spoke on the positive and At left, Gordon Graham, Princeton Theological normative foundations of justice under law. We were joined by Seminary. Above, Barry Weingast (political science, Stanford University), who spoke workshop attendees. At right, Robert Sugden, on the early modern development of constitutional systems. University of East Anglia

Recent scholarly work is casting new light on the evolved human capacities — both cognitive and moral — that enable simple, and also extremely complex, forms of cooperation. This work speaks to fundamental questions of human nature: our capacity and or even disposition, at least under favorable circumstances, to engage in reciprocal (and fair?) cooperation. What do the evolutionary origins of these human capacities tell us about the prospects for new forms of social organization and their limits? What insights, if any, does this new work yield concerning moral reflection on systems of law and social organization?

The Positive Models and Normative Ideals of Social Cooperation workshop, held at Princeton May 10 to 12 under the auspices of the Democracy and Human Values Project, brought to Princeton an interdisciplinary group of scholars for a series of discussions Fostering Collaboration 19

What do the evolutionary origins of these human capacities tell us about the prospects for new forms of social organization and their limits? — Stephen Macedo

In one noteworthy presentation, Robert Boyd (anthropology, social practices involving reputation, reciprocation and retribution. University of California, Los Angeles), emphasized the astonishing Stable cultural variation has in turn facilitated group selection, and degree of human cooperativeness, including large-scale cooperation the evolution of social instincts and moral norms. Several dozen among non-kin, even in the simplest human societies. He argued Princeton faculty, graduate students and visitors joined in these that the key to explaining human cooperation and adaptability is discussions, and at the end of the three days, much ground had the rapid cultural evolution of norms enforced by third parties via been covered.

Clockwise from left: Daniel Posner, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Stephen Macedo (left), politics and University Center for Human Values, and Philip Pettit, politics and University Center for Human Values; Robert Keohane, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs 20 Fostering Collaboration

Co-sponsored Events

October 6 March 17-18 Public Lecture: “Sonia Sotomayor: An American Life After Multiculturalism” Symposium: Slavery, Race and Gender in Islamic Societies: A Comparative by Lázaro Lima, University of Richmond Perspective Co-sponsored by Acción Latina; Chicano Caucus; Davis International Co-sponsored by the Center for the Study of Religion; Council of the Center; Department of Spanish and Portuguese Languages and Humanities; Department of Near Eastern Studies; Program in Near Eastern Cultures; Fields Center; Latino Heritage Month Planning Committee; Studies; Institute for the Transregional Study of the Contemporary Middle Latino Princetonians Employee Resource Group; Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual East, North Africa and Central Asia; James Madison Program in American and Transgender Center; Pride Alliance; Program in American Studies; Ideals and Institutions; Princeton Institute for International and Regional Program in Gender and Sexuality Studies; Program in Latin American Studies; Program in Gender and Sexuality Studies; Program in Medieval Studies; Program in Latino Studies; Program in Law and Public Affairs; and Studies; Program in the Ancient World; and Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Women’s Center Historical Studies

November 11 March 30 Ritual and Narrative in Music of Post-Modern Eastern Europe: A Program Conference: Topologies of Reading of Contemporary Bulgarian and Russian Piano Music Co-sponsored by the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, Co-sponsored by the Department of Music and Department of Slavic Department of German, Department of English, Department of History, Languages and Literatures School of Architecture, Princeton University Graduate School and Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies November 12 March 30-31 Princeton Bioethics Conference Workshop: Human Trafficking in the 21st Century Co-sponsored by the Student Bioethics Forum, University Student Government, Department of Molecular Biology and Department of Co-sponsored by Princeton Against Sex Trafficking, Gender and Policy Anthropology Network, Program in Law and Public Affairs, Office of Religious Life, Program in Gender and Sexuality Studies and Department of Anthropology December 3-4 April 13-14 Classical Philosophy Colloquium Conference: Governing Science: Technological Progress, Ethical Norms Co-sponsored by the Department of Philosophy, Department of Classics, and Democracy Council of the Humanities and Program in Hellenic Studies Co-sponsored by the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions, Bouton Law Lecture Fund and Keller Center for Innovation in Engineering Education Fostering Collaboration 21

April 14 May 18-19 Conference: Medieval Structures of Power Conference: New Developments in Immigration and Immigration Reform in the United States Co-sponsored by the Program in Medieval Studies, Council of the Humanities, Center for the Study of Religion, Shelby Cullom Davis Center Co-sponsored by the Center for Migration and Development, Latin for Historical Studies and Department of French and Italian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Offi ce of Population Research, Program in Latin American Studies and Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies May 4-6 Conference: Objects of Affection: Towards a Materiology of Emotions Fall 2011-Spring 2012 Co-sponsored by the Program in Russian and Eurasian Studies and Public Lecture Series: Reporting South Asia Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies Co-sponsored by the Program in South Asian Studies; Council of the Humanities; Edwin Ferris Journalism Program; and Institute for the May 6-7 Transregional Study of the Contemporary Middle East, North Africa Young Ethicist’s Project and Central Asia Co-sponsored by the Department of Philosophy Fall 2011-Spring 2012 May 11-12 Buddhist Ethics Reading Group Conference: Actuality and Idea Co-sponsored by the Buddhist Studies Workshop, Department of Religion, Program in South Asian Studies, Council of the Humanities Co-sponsored by the Department of Comparative Literature, Department and Dean of the Chapel of French and Italian, Department of German, Department of Spanish and Portuguese Languages and Cultures, Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program in the Humanities, Program in American Studies, Program in European Spring 2012 Cultural Studies and Program in Latin American Studies Public Lecture Series: From Without: The Russian Revolution Across Borders May 17-19 Co-sponsored by the Program in Russian and Eurasian Studies, Conference: Jeffersonian Democracy: From Theory to Practice Council of the Humanities, Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Historical Studies, Department of Art and Archeology, Department of German, Co-sponsored by the Colonial Americas Workshops, Papers of Thomas Department of History, Department of Politics, Department of Slavic Jefferson, Department of History, Program in Law and Public Affairs, James Languages and Literatures and Program in Media and Modernity Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions, Program in American Studies and Council of the Humanities 22 TEACHING AND LEARNING

Values in Public Life: Letter from the director By Melissa Lane, Director, Program in Values and Public Life; Professor of Politics

…this year we continued to bring together students with common passions but diverse backgrounds and academic skills in pursuit of a deeper understanding of how to think and argue about values… — Melissa Lane

Melissa Lane, politics

This has been the second year of the Values and Public Life topics ranging from ethics of foster care in New Jersey, to human (VPL) undergraduate certificate program, which is crystallizing rights from perspectives of both sociology and political theory. The as an academic and extra-academic community. With the conference concluded with a thoughtful personal keynote address support of a three-year grant from Princeton’s 250th Anniversary by Jeffrey Wieser ’74, President and CEO of Homes with Hope, Fund for Innovation in Undergraduate Education, this year we about the problem of homelessness. continued to bring together students with common passions but diverse backgrounds and academic skills in pursuit of a deeper Beyond formal academic work, we continued our series of VPL understanding of how to think and argue about values and their Conversations featuring faculty members and practitioners, and public relevance. launched our first annual field trip, taking a lively group of students to Washington, D.C. We met with Quentin Wodon of the World Academically, students were able to choose from two junior- Bank and Robert Weissman of Public Citizen. Nicholas (’74) and senior seminars supported by the Fund — Anna Stilz’s seminar Marla Allard organized an unforgettable lunch discussion with on “Indigenous Peoples and Historic Injustice” and Stephen former Senator Paul Sarbanes and Acting Commissioner Marty Macedo’s seminar on “Moral Conflicts in Public and Private Life” Gruenberg of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. — alongside seminars taught by other UCHV faculty. The seniors participated in a year-long sequence of senior thesis workshops, With all these strands intertwining, the VPL program is thriving, culminating in two evenings of presentations to their peers and and it benefits greatly from the rich intellectual resources of the associated faculty. Selected seniors and juniors shared their research University Center for Human Values. It is only two years since we more widely at the second annual VPL Undergraduate Conference, began, but already it is hard to imagine what life would be like at focusing this year on “Rights and Law,” with student papers on the center without VPL. Teaching and Learning 23

SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITYUCHV CITIZEN PresentsNATION IDENTITY ETHICS the MODERNITY Second RESPONSIBILITY Annual CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW SOCIETYEQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY WRONG DUTY PLURALITYSUPEREROGATORY COMMUNITY RULES CITIZEN FAIRNESS NATION UTILITY IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMStudent LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE DUTYOBLIGATION SUPEREROGATORY SENTIMENTS RULES FREEDOM FAIRNESS DEMOCRACY UTILITY SOCIETY RECIPROCITY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION SION CASUISTRY NATURALCONSEQUENTIALISM LAW IMPERATIVE LAWOBLIGATION EQUALITY SENTIMENTS RIGHT WRONG FREEDOM DUTY SUPEREROGATORY DEMOCRACY SOCIETY RULES WRONG FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY RULES FAIRNESS CITIZEN EQUALITY NATION JUSTICEIDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSIONConference CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL forLAW IMPERATIVE the OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONGSOCIETY DUTY INDIVIDUALITY SUPEREROGATORY PLURALITY RULES COMMUNITY FAIRNESS UTILITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSIONNATURAL LAW CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE NATURAL OBLIGATION LAW SENTIMENTSIMPERATIVE OBLIGATIONFREEDOM DEMOCRACY SENTIMENTS SOCIETY FREEDOM INDIVIDUALITY DEMOCRACY PLURALITY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATIONClockwise SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY fromSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY bottom: PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICEUndergraduate COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM Certifi DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYcate Program in PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVECONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS LAW EQUALITY FREEDOM RIGHT DEMOCRACY WRONG DUTYSOCIETY SUPEREROGATORY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESSPLURALITY UTILITY COMMUNITY RECIPROCITY CITIZEN RULES NATION FAIRNESS IDENTITY EQUALITYETHICS MODERNITY JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYMariana SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITYOlaizola CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ’13 ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYSOCIETY JUSTICE INDIVIDUALITY COMPASSION PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY NATURAL CITIZEN LAW NATION IMPERATIVE IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYRULES FAIRNESS OBLIGATION UTILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY LAW EQUALITY JUSTICE RIGHTCOMPASSION WRONG CA SUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAWNATION IMPERATIVE IDENTITY OBLIGATIONETHICS MODERNITY SENTIMENTS RESPONSIBILITY FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMEQUALITY JUSTICE EQUALITY COMPASSION RIGHT CASUISTRYWRONG DUTY IMPERATIVE SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS RULES FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSI- FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTSBILITY FREEDOM OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY CONSEQUENTIALISM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY LAW EQUALITY WRONG PLURALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATOCOMMUNITY RY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATIONRULES FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS UTILITY FREEDOM RECIPROCITY DEMOCRACY RULES SOCIETY FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY EQUALITY PLURALITY JUSTICE COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICSRIGHT MODERNITY WRONG DUTY RESPONSIBILITY RULES FAIRNESS CASUISTRY UTILITY RECIPROCITY OBLIGATION RULES CONSEQUENTIALISM FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITYand COMMUNITY Trace CITIZEN IDENTITY Feng ETHICS MODERNITY ’12 RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRYINDIVIDUALITY NATURAL PLURALITY LAW COMMUNITY IMPERATIVE CITIZEN OBLIGATION NATION IDENTITY SENTIMENTS ETHICS MODERNITY FREEDOM RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITYFAIRNESS COMMUNITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY CITIZEN NATION RULES FAIRNESSIDENTITY EQUALITY MODERNITY JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORYIDENTITY RULES ETHICS FAIRNESS MODERNITY UTILITY RESPONSIBILITY RECIPROCITY CA SUISTRYRULES EQUALITYOBLIGATION JUSTICE CONSEQUENTIALISM COMPASSION LAW CASUISTRY EQUALITY RIGHT NATURAL WRONG LAW DUTY IMPERATIVE SUPEREROGA OBLIGATIONTORY RULES FA SENTIMENTSIRNESS UTILITY FREEDOM RECIPROCITY DEMOCRACY RULES FAIRNESS SOCIETY EQUAL- INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZENITY JUSTICE NATION COMPASSION IDENTITY CASUISTRYETHICS MODERNITY NATURAL LAW RESPONSIBILITY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS CONSEQUENTIALISM FREEDOM DEMOCRACY LAW EQUALITY SOCIETY PLURALITY WRONG DUTY COMMUNITY SUPEREROGATORY CITIZEN NATION RULES IDENTITY FAIRNESS ETHICS MODERNITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY RESPONSIBILITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURALCASUISTRY LAW OBLIGATION IMPERATIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION SENTIMENTSLAW EQUALITY FREEDOMRIGHT WRONG DEMOCRACY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY COMMUNITY RULES CITIZEN FAIRNESS NATION JUSTICE IDENTITY COMPASSION ETHICS CASUISTRY MODERNITY NATURAL RESPONSIBILITY LAW CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAWIMPERATIVE EQUALITY SENTIMENTS RIGHT WRONG FREEDOM DUTY DEMOCRACY SUPEREROGATORY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY UTILITY COMMUNITY RECIPROCITY CITIZEN RULESNATION FAIRNESSIDENTITY ETHICS EQUALITY MODERNITY JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW IMPERATIVE LA OBLIGATIONW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETYEQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORYPLURALITY COMMUNITY RULES FA CITIZENIRNESS UTILITY NATION RECIPROCITY IDENTITY ETHICS RULES FA MODERNITYIRNESS EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY SENTIMENTS RIGHT FREEDOM WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESSDEMOCRACY UTILITY SOCIETY RECIPROCITYRULES INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY FAIRNESS COMMUNITY EQUALITY CITIZEN JUSTICE NATION COMPASSION IDENTITY MODERNITY CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY NATURAL LAW CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS LAW FREEDOM EQUALITY DEMOCRACY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITYRULES FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESSOBLIGATION EQUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM JUSTICE COMPASSION LAW CASUISTRY EQUALITY NATURAL RIGHT WRONG LAW IMPER DUTYATIVE SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS RULES FREEDOM FAIRNESS DEMOCRA UTILITYCY RECIPROCITYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESSPLURALITY EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSIONCOMMUNITY CITIZEN NATURAL NATION LAW IDENTITY IMPERATIVE MODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY FREEDOM OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY CONSEQUENTIALISM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY LAW EQUALITY RIGHT PLURALITY WRONG COMMUNITY DUTY RULES FA CITIZENIRNESS UTILITYNATION RECIPROCITY IDENTITY ETHICS RULES FAMODERNITYIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESSEQUALITY EQUALITY JUSTICE JUSTICE CASUISTRY COMPASSION NATURAL LAW NA OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASU- DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYISTRY OBLIGATION CASUISTRYCONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RIGHT WRONG DUTY LAW SUPEREROGATORYEQUALITY RIGHT RULESWRONG FA IRNESSDUTY SUPEREROGATORY UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULESRULES FAFAIRNESSIRNESS EQUALITY UTILITY JUSTICE RECIPROCITY COMPASSION RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS NATURAL EQUALITY LAW JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRYOBLIGATION NATURAL SENTIMENTSLAW IMPERATIVE FREEDOM OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY SENTIMENTS SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY FREEDOM PLURALITY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYCOMMUNITY CITIZEN PLURALITY NATION IDENTITY COMMUNITY ETHICS NATION MODERNITY IDENTITY RESPONSIBILITY ETHICS MODERNITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATIONRESPONSIBILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY LAOBLIGATIONW CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORYEQUALITY RIGHT RULESWRONG FAIRNESS DUTY SUPEREROGATORY UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS RULES UTILITY FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY EQUALITY RULES JUSTICE FAIRNESS COMPASSION EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY COMPASSION NATURAL NATURAL LAW LAWIMPERATIVE IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY DEMOC- SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITYRACY SOCIETY COMMUNITY INDIVIDUALITY CITIZEN PLURALITY IDENTITY COMMUNITY ETHICS MODERNITY CITIZEN NATION RESPONSIBILITY IDENTITY ETHICS CASUISTRY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYOBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT RIGHT WRONG WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORYDUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FA IRNESSRULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYUTILITY RULES RECIPROCITY FAIRNESS RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS JUSTICE EQUALITY COMPASSION JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRY NATURAL NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVELAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS SENTIMENTS FREEDOMFREEDOM DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACYSOCIETY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYCE SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRYDUTY SUPEREROGATORY NATURAL LAW RULES IMPERATIVE FAIRNESS OBLIGATION UTILITY RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS RULES FREEDOMFAIRNESS EQUALITY DEMOCRACY JUSTICE SOCIETY COMPASSION INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY PLURALITY NATURAL LAW COMMUNITY IMPERATIVE CITIZENOBLIGATION NATION SENTIMENTS IDENTITY FREEDOM ETHICS DEMOCR MODERNITYACY INDIVIDU- RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATIONALITY COMMUNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM CITIZEN NATION LAW IDENTITY EQUALITY MODERNITY RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORYCASUISTRY OBLIGATION RULES CONSEQUENTIALISM FAIRNESS UTILITY LAW EQUALITY RECIPROCITY RIGHT WRONGRULES DUTYFAIRNESS SUPEREROGATORY EQUALITY JUSTICE RULES FA COMPASSIONIRNESS UTILITY CASUISTRYRECIPROCITY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATIONRULES FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS EQUALITY FREEDOM JUSTICE DEMOCRACY COMPASSION SOCIETYCASUISTRY INDIVIDUALITY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN FREEDOMNATION IDENTITY DEMOCRACY ETHICS SOCIETY MODERNITY INDIVIDUALITY RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CITIZEN CONSEQUENTIALISM NATION IDENTITY LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT ETHICSWRONG MODERNITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RESPONSIBILITY CA RULESSUISTRY FAIRNESS OBLIGATION UTILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RECIPROCITY LAW RULES EQUALITY FAIRNESS RIGHT EQUALITYWRONG SUPEREROGATORY JUSTICE COMPASSION RULES FAIRNESS CASUISTRY UTILITY NATURAL RECIPROCITY LAW ULESIMPERATIVE FAIRNESS OBLIGATION EQUALITYCOMP SENTIMENTSASSION FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYCA SUISTRYSOCIETY NATURAL INDIVIDUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN FREEDOM NATION SOCIETY IDENTITY INDIVIDUALITY ETHICS MODERNITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY NATION CASUISTRYIDENTITY ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY EQUALITY OBLIGA RIGHTTION CONSEQUEN-WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULESTIALISM FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITYUTILITY RECIPROCITY RIGHT WRONG DUTYRULES SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS EQUALITY RULES FAIRNESSJUSTICE COMPASSIONUTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES FAIRNESSNATURAL EQUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE JUSTICE COMPASSION OBLIGATION CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS NATURAL FREEDOM LAW SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY FREEDOM SOCIETY DEMOC- INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATIONRACY IDENTITY SOCIETY ETHICS INDIVIDUALITY MODERNITY PLURALITY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITY CASUISTRYCITIZEN NATION OBLIGATION IDENTITY ETHICS CONSEQUENTIALISM MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY LAW EQUALITY CASUISTRY RIGHT OBLIGATION WRONG DUTY LAW QUALITY SUPEREROGATORY RIGHT WRONG RULES DUTY SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS UTILITY RULES RECIPROCITY FAIRNESS RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY UTILITYNATURAL RECIPROCITY LAW IMPERATIVE RULES FA IRNESSOBLIGATION EQUALITY SENTIMENTS JUSTICE COMPASSION DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY NATURAL INDIVIDUALITY LAW IMPER PLURALITYATIVE OBLIGATION COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN DEMOCR NATIONACY SOCIETY IDENTITY INDIVIDUALITY ETHICS MODERNITY PLURALITY RESPONSIBILITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN CASUISTRY NATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMIDENTITY LAW EQUALITY ETHICS MODERNITY RIGHT WRONG RESPONSIBILITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION RULES CONSEQUENTIALISM FAIRNESS UTILITY LAW RECIPROCITY EQUALITY RIGHT RULES WRONG FAIRNESS DUTY SUPEREROG EQUALITYATORY JUSTICE RULES COMPASSION UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES NATURALFAIRNESS EQUALITYLAW IMPERATIVE JUSTICE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION JUSTICE CASUISTRY COMPASSION NATURAL CASUISTRY LAW IMPERATIVE NATURAL OBLIGATION LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS OBLIGATIONFREEDOM DEMOCRACY SENTIMENTS SOCIETY FREEDOM INDIVIDUALITY DEMOCRACY PLURALITY SOCIETY COMMUNITY INDIVIDUALITY CITIZEN IDENTITY PLURALITY ETHICS COMMUNITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN NATION CA SU-ID SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRYISTRY NATURAL OBLIGATION LAW CONSEQUENTIALISM IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY SENTIMENTS RIGHT WRONG FREEDOM DUTY SUPEREROGATORY DEMOCRACY SOCIETY RULES FAINDIVIDUALITYIRNESS UTILITY COMMUNITYRECIPROCITY RULESCITIZEN FA IRNESSNATION EQUALITY IDENTITY JUSTICE ETHICS COMPASSION MODERNITY CA RESPONSIBILITYSUISTRY NATURAL LAW CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMIMPERATIVE LAW EQUALITY OBLIGATION WRONG SENTIMENTS DUTY SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY RULES SOCIETY FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY UTILITY PLURALITY RECIPROCITY COMMUNITY RULES CITIZEN FAIRNESS NATION EQUALITY IDENTITY JUSTICE ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY COMPASSION CASUISTRYNATURAL LAWOBLIGA IMPERATIVETION CONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION LAWSENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYEQUALITY PLURALITYRIGHT WRONG COMMUNITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CITIZEN NATION RULES IDENTITYFAIRNESS ETHICSUTILITY RECIPROCITY MODERNITY RULES RESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE OBLIGATION COMPASSION CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY NATURAL LAWLAW IMPER EQUALITYATIVE OBLIGARIGHT TIONWRONG SENTIMENTS SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY DEMOCRACYSOCIETYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY JUSTICE PLURALITY COMPASSION COMMUNITY CASUISTRY CITIZEN NATION NATURAL IDENTITY LAW ETHICS IMPERATIVE MODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY FREEDOM OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY CONSEQUENTIALISM SOCIETY LA PLURALITYW EQUALITY COMMUNITY RIGHT WRONG CITIZEN DUTY SUPER- NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY EROGATORESPONSIBILITYRY RULES FAIRNESSCASUISTRY UTILITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE LAW COMPASSIONEQUALITY RIGHT CASUISTRY WRONG NATURAL SUPEREROGATORY LAW IMPERATIVE RULES OBLIGATION FAIRNESS SENTIMENTS UTILITY FREEDOM RECIPROCITY DEMOCR RULESACY SOCIETY FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY EQUALITY COMMU- JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURALNITY CITIZEN LAW NATION IMPERATIVE IDENTITY OBLIGATIONETHICS MODERNITY SENTIMENTS RESPONSIBILITY FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY CONSEQUENTIALISM INDIVIDUALITY LAW PLURALITY EQUALITY COMMUNITYRIGHT WRONG CITIZENDUTY SUPEREROGATORY NATION IDENTITY RULES MODERNITY FAIRNESS UTILITYRESPONSIBILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHTFAIRNESS WRONG EQUALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORYJUSTICE COMPASSION RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS IMPERATIVE UTILITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS RULES FREEDOM FAIRNESS DEMOCRACY EQUALITY SOCIETY JUSTICE INDIVIDUALITY COMPASSION PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY NATURAL CITIZEN LAW NA OBLIGATIONTION IDENTITY SENTIMENTS ETHICS MODERNITY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETYRESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION PLURALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM COMMUNITY LAW CITIZEN EQUALITY NATION WRONG IDENTITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY ETHICS MODERNITY RULES RESPONSIBILITY FAIRNESS UTILITY CASUISTRYRECIPROCITY OBLIGATIONRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT JUSTICE WRONG COMPASSION DUTY SUPEREROGATORY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURALDUTY LAW SUPEREROGATORY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION RULES FAIRNESSSENTIMENTS UTILITY FREEDOM RECIPROCITY DEMOCRACY RULES SOCIETY FAIRNESS INDIVIDUALITY EQUALITY JUSTICE PLURALITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRYOBLIGATION OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS CONSEQUENTIALISM FREEDOM DEMOCRACY LAW SOCIETY EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY RIGHT WRONG PLURALITY DUTY COMMUNITY SUPEREROGATORY CITIZEN NATION RULES IDENTITY FAIRNESS ETHICS UTILITY MODERNITY RECIPROCITY RESPONSIBILITY RULES CA FAIRNESSSUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY JUSTICE LA WCOMPASSION EQUALITY RIGHT CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVEWRONG DUTY OBLIGATION RULES FA SENTIMENTSIRNESS UTILITY FREEDOM RECIPROCITY SOCIETY RULES FAIRNESSINDIVIDUALITY EQUALITY PLURALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION COMMUNITY CASUISTRY NATION IDENTITYNATURAL LAW ETHICS IMPERATIVE MODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY SENTIMENTS FREEDOMCASUISTRY DEMOCRA OBLIGATIONCY SOCIETY CONSEQUENTIALISM INDIVIDUAL- LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES ITYFAIRNESS PLURALITY UTILITY COMMUNITY RECIPROCITY CITIZEN NATION RULES IDENTITY FAIRNESS ETHICS EQUALITY MODERNITY JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW IMPERATIVE LAW OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT SENTIMENTS WRONG SUPEREROGATORY DEMOCRACY SOCIETY RULES FA IRNESSINDIVIDUALITY UTILITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZENRECIPROCITY IDENTITY RULES ETHICS FAIRNESS MODERNITY EQUALITY JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRY IMPERATIVEOBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM SENTIMENTS FREEDOMLAW EQUALITY SOCIETY RIGHT INDIVIDUALITY WRONG PLURALITYDUTY SUPEREROGATORY COMMUNITY CITIZEN RULES NATION FAIRNESS IDENTITY UTILITY ETHICS MODER-RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESSNITY EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY JUSTICE CACOMPASSIONSUISTRY OBLIGATION CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM NATURAL LAW LAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITY RIGHT OBLIGATION WRONG DUTY SENTIMENTS SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM RULES DEMOCRACYSOCIETY FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY INDIVIDUALITY RULES PLURALITY FAIRNESS EQUALITY COMMUNITY JUSTICE CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAWSION IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY NATURALOBLIGATION LAW IMPERATIVESENTIMENTS OBLIGATION FREEDOM SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY FREEDOM SOCIETY DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY SOCIETY PLURALITYWRONG INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY PLURALITY CITIZEN COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS IDENTITY MODERNITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITYCASUISTRY RIGHT OBLIGATIONWRONG SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES LAW EQUALITY FAIRNESS RIGHT UTILITY DUTY RULESRECIPROCITY FAIRNESS RULES UTILITY FAIRNESS RECIPROCITY EQUALITY RULES FA JUSTICEIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS OBLIGATION SENTI- FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODER SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES MENTSFAIRNESS FREEDOM UTILITY DEMOCRA RECIPROCITYCY SOCIETY RULES INDIVIDUALITY FAIRNESS PLURALITY JUSTICE COMMUNITY COMPASSION CITIZEN CASUISTRY NATION IDENTITY NATURAL ETHICS LAW MODERNITY IMPERATIVE RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION OBLIGATIONSENTIMENTS CONSEQUENTIALISM FREEDOM DEMOCRACY LAW EQUALITY SOCIETY RIGHT INDIVIDUALITY WRONG DUTY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZENSUPEREROGATO NATION IDENTITYRY RULES ETHICS FAIRNESS MODERNITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY RESPONSIBILITY RULES FA CASUISTRYIRNESS EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE COMPASSION CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY LAW NATURAL EQUALITY LAW IMPERATIVE RIGHT WRONG OBLIG ATDUTYION SENTIMENTSSUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM RULES DEMOCR FAIRNESSACY SOCIETY UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYINDIVIDUALITY JUSTICE PLURALITY COMPASSION CITIZEN NA CASUISTRYTION IDENTITY NATURAL ETHICS MODERNITYLAW IMPERATIVE RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CASUISTRY SENTIMENTS OBLIGATION FREEDOM CONSEQUENTIALISM DEMOCRACY LAW SOCIETY EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTYPLURALITY SUPEREROGATORY COMMUNITY RULES CITIZEN FAIRNESS NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITYUTILITY RESPONSIBILITY RECIPROCITY RULES OBLIGATION FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION LAW EQUALITY CASUISTRY RIGHT NATURAL WRONG LAW DUTY IMPERATIVE SUPEREROGATORY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS RULES FAIRNESS FREEDOM UTILITY DEMOCR RECIPROCITYACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY EQUALITY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRYCITIZEN NATURAL IDENTITY LAW ETHICS IMPERATIVE MODERNITY OBLIGATION RESPONSIBILITY SENTIMENTS CASUISTRY FREEDOM OBLIGAT DEMOCRACYION CONSEQUENTIALISM SOCIETY LAWINDIVIDUALITY EQUALITY RIGHT PLURALITY WRONG DUTY COMMUNITY SUPEREROGATO CITIZENRY NATIONRULES RECIPROCITY IDENTITY ETHICS RULES FAMODERNITYIRNESS EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMCOMPASSION CASUISTR LAW EQUALITYY NATURAL RIGHT LAW IMPERATIVE WRONG DUTY OBLIGATION SUPEREROGATORY SENTIMENTS FREEDOM RULES FAIRNESSDEMOCRACY UTILITY SOCIETY RECIPROCITY INDIVIDUALITY RULES PLURALITY FAIRNESS COMMUNITY EQUALITY CITIZEN JUSTICE NATION IDENTITYCOMPASSION ETHICS CASUISTRY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYNATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTSOBLIGATION FREEDOM CONSEQUENTIALISM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYLAW EQUALITY RIGHT PLURALITY WRONG DUTYCOMMUNITY SUPEREROGATORY NATION IDENTITY RULES FAIRNESS ETHICS UTILITY MODERNITY RECIPROCITY RESPONSIBILITY RULES FAIRNESS CASUISTRY EQUALITY OBLIGATIONJUSTICE COMPASSION CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW EQUALITYLAW IMPERA- RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYTIVE OBLIGATION RULES SENTIMENTS FAIRNESS FREEDOM EQUALITY DEMOCRA JUSTICECYSOCIETY COMPASSION INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY PLURALITY NATURAL COMMUNITY LAW CITIZEN IMPERATIVE NATION IDENTITYOBLIGATION ETHICS SENTIMENTS MODERNITY OpenRESPONSIBILITYDEMOCRACY SOCIETY OBLIGtoAT IONINDIVIDUALITYthe CONSEQUENTIALISM University PLURALITY LAW EQUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICSRIGHT MODERNITY WRONG DUTY RESPONSIBILITY SUPEREROGATORY CASUISTRY RULES FAIRNESS OBLIGATION UTILITY RECIPROCITYCONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY EQUALITY RIGHTJUSTICE WRONG COMPASSION DUTY CA SUPEREROGATORYSUISTRY NATURAL LAW RULES IMPER FAIRNESSATIVE OBLIGATION UTILITY SENTIMENTS RECIPROCITY FREEDOM RULES DEMOC- FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORYRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY UTILITY COMMUNITY RECIPROCITY CITIZEN RULESNATION FAIRNESS ETHICS MODERNITY EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY CASUISTRYOBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE LAW EQUALITY OBLIGATION RIGHT WRONG SENTIMENTS DUTY SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALI SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONGRULES DUTY FAIRNESS SUPEREROGATORY UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES RULESFAIRNESS FAIRNESS UTILITY EQUALITY RECIPROCITY JUSTICE COMPASSION RULES EQUALITY CASUISTRY JUSTICE NATURAL COMPASSION LAW IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL SENTIMENTS LAW IMPERATIVE FREEDOM DEMOCRACY OBLIGATION SOCIETY SENTIMENTS INDIVIDUALITY FREEDOM PLURALITY DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITYCOMMUNITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NA TIONCITIZEN IDENTITY NATION ETHICS IDENTITY MODERNITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY MODERNITY CA RESPONSIBILITYSUISTRY OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT LAW WRONG EQUALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORYWRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RULES RECIPROCITY FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSIONRULES FAIRNESS CASUISTRY EQUALITY NATURAL JUSTICE COMP LAWASSION IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY OBLIGATION NATURAL LAWSENTIMENTS IMPERATIVE FREEDOM OBLIGATION DEMOCRACY SENTIMENTS SOCIETYFREEDOM INDIVIDUALITYDEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN CITIZEN NATION NATION IDENTITY IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYand RULES the FAIRNESS public EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION— all are IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOMCASUISTRY DEMOCRACY NATURAL LAW SOCIETY IMPERATIVE INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS PLURALITY FREEDOM COMMUNITY DEMOCRACY CITIZEN SOCIETY NATION INDIVIDUALITY IDENTITY ETHICS PLURALITY MODERNITY COMMUNITY RESPONSIBILITY CITIZEN NATION CASUISTRYIDENTITY ETHICS OBLIGATION MODERNITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORYOBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LA UTILITYW EQUALITY RECIPROCITYRULES RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY FAIRNESS EQUALITY RULES FA JUSTICEIRNESS UTILITY COMPASSION RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY RULES FAIRNESS NATURAL EQUALITYCOM LAW IMPERATIVEPASSION OBLIGATION CASUISTRY NATURAL SENTIMENTS LAW IMPERATIVE FREEDOM OBLIGA- DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATIONTION SENTIMENTS IDENTITY ETHICS FREEDOM MODERNITY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION NATION IDENTITY CONSEQUENTIALISM ETHICS MODERNITY LAW RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY RIGHT CASUISTRY WRONG OBLIGATION DUTY SUPEREROGATORY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES LAW EQUALITY FAIRNESS RIGHT UTILITY WRONG RECIPROCITY DUTY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESSSUPEREROGATO EQUALITY JUSTICERY RULES COMPASSION FAIRNESS UTILITY NATURAL RECIPROCITY LAW IMPERATIVE RULES FAIRNESS OBLIGATION EQUALITY SENTIMENTSJUSTICE COMPASSION FREEDOM CASUISTRY DEMOCRACY NATURAL SOCIETY LAW SENTIMENTS INDIVIDUALITY FREEDOM PLURALITY DEMOCRAC COMMUNITYY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY CITIZEN NATION PLURALITY IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPACOMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORYwelcome RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY to RECIPROCITY attend RULES FAIRNESS DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYEQUALITY JUSTICE INDIVIDUALITY COMPASSION COMMUNITY CASUISTRY NATURALCITIZEN LAWNATION IMPERATIVE IDENTITY OBLIGATION MODERNITY SENTIMENTS RESPONSIBILITY DEMOCRACY CASUISTRY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION PLURALITY CONSEQUENTIALISM COMMUNITY CITIZEN LAW EQUALITY NATION IDENTITY RIGHT ETHICSWRONG MODERNITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESSRESPONSIBILITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION ULES FAIRNESS CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITYCOMPASSION LAW EQUALITY RIGHTCASUISTRY WRONG NATURALDUTY SUPEREROGATORY LAW IMPERATIVE RULES OBLIGATION UTILITY RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS RULES FREEDOM FAIRNESS EQUALITYSOCIETY JUSTICEINDIVIDUALITY COMPASSION PLURALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITYNATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE CASUISTRY OBLIGA OBLIGATIONTION SENTIMENTS LAW QUALITY FREEDOM RIGHT DEMOCRACY WRONG SOCIETYDUTY SUPEREROGATORY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY RULES COMMUNITY FAIRNESS CITIZEN UTILITY IDENTITY RECIPROCITY ETHICS MODERNITYRULES FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY CA SUISTRYJUSTICE OBLIGATION COMPASSION CONSE- CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION LAW SENTIMENTS EQUALITY RIGHT FREEDOM WRONG DEMOCRACY DUTY SUPEREROG SOCIETYATORY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY COMMUNITY RULES CITIZEN FAIRNESS IDENTITY EQUALITY ETHICS JUSTICE MODERNITY COMPASSION RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY NATURAL CASUISTRY LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITYSENTIMENTS RIGHT WRONG FREEDOM DUTY DEMOCRACY SUPEREROGATORY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY UTILITY COMMUNITY RECIPROCITY CITIZEN NATION RULES IDENTITY FAIRNESS ETHICS EQUALITY RESPONSIBILITY JUSTICE CACOMPASSIONSUISTRY OBLIGATION CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM NATURAL LAW LAW IMPERATIVE EQUALITY RIGHT OBLIGATION WRONG SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYDERNITY SOCIETYRESPONSIBILITY INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY COMMUNITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY LAW EQUALITY ETHICS RIGHT MODERNITY WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RESPONSIBILITY RULES CASUISTRY FAIRNESS OBLIGATION UTILITY RECIPROCITY CONSEQUENTIALISM RULES FAIRNESS LAW EQUALITY EQUALITY JUSTICE RIGHT COMPASSION WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITYCA RECIPROCITYSUISTRY NATURAL RULES LAW FAIRNESS IMPERATIVE EQUALITY OBLIGATION JUSTICE SENTIMENTS COMPASSION FREEDOM DEMOCRACYNATURAL LAW SOCIETY IMPERATIVE INDIVIDUALITY OBLIGATION PLURALITY SENTIMENTS COMMUNITY FREEDOM CITIZEN NATION DEMOCRACY IDENTITY MODERNITYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY CASUISTRY OBLIGA-COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITYTION RESPONSIBILITY CONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY LAW EQUALITY OBLIGATION WRONG DUTY CONSEQUENTIALISM SUPEREROGATORY RULES LAW EQUALITY FAIRNESS UTILITYRIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATIONCASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISMOBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY LAW RIGHT EQUALITY WRONG WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORYDUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RULES FAIRNESS FAIRNESS UTILITY UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTSFriday, FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY April INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY 20, COMMUNITY CITIZEN 2012 NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY DUTY SUPEREROGATORYNATURAL RULES LAWFAIRNESS IMPERATIVE UTILITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS RULES FAIRNESS FREEDOM EQUALITY DEMOCRACY JUSTICE SOCIETY COMPASSION INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY PLURALITY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVECONSEQUENTIALISM OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS LAW EQUALITY FREEDOM RIGHT DEMOCRACY WRONG DUTY SOCIETY SUPEREROGATORY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY UTILITY COMMUNITY RECIPROCITY CITIZEN RULES NATION FAIRNESS IDENTITY EQUALITY ETHICS MODERNITY JUSTICE RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATIONMarx CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW Hall,EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG Room 301 1:30-6:30 p.m. DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITYLAW EQUALITY PLURALITYWRONG DUTY COMMUNITY SUPEREROGATORY CITIZEN NATION RULES IDENTITYFAIRNESS ETHICS UTILITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY DUTY SUPEREROGATORYNATURAL LAW RULES IMPERATIVE FAIRNESS OBLIGATION UTILITY RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS RULESFREEDOM FAIRNESS DEMOCRACY EQUALITY SOCIETY JUSTICE INDIVIDUALITY COMPASSION PLURALITY CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITYRights RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATIONand CONSEQUENTIALISM Law LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION SIONCONSEQUENTIALISM CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW LAW EQUALITY IMPERATIVE RIGHT OBLIGATION WRONG DUTY SENTIMENTS SUPEREROGATORY FREEDOM RULES DEMOCRACY FAIRNESS SOCIETY UTILITY WRONG RECIPROCITY INDIVIDUALITY RULES FAIRNESS PLURALITY EQUALITY COMMUNITY JUSTICE CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY1:30-2:45 RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY p.m. RECIPROCITY Student RULES FAIRNESS Panel EQUALITY JUSTICE 1 COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISMSOCIETY LAW EQUALITY INDIVIDUALITY WRONG PLURALITYDUTY SUPEREROGATORY COMMUNITY CITIZEN RULES FAIRNESSNATION IDENTITY UTILITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS3-4:15 FREEDOM p.m. DEMOCRACY Student SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY Panel PLURALITY 2 COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY DUTY SUPEREROGATORYNATURAL RULES LAWFAIRNESS IMPERATIVE UTILITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS RULES FAIRNESS FREEDOM EQUALITY DEMOCRACY JUSTICE SOCIETY COMPASSION INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY PLURALITY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHTBoth WRONG DUTY panels RULES FAIRNESS will UTILITY present RECIPROCITY RULESindependent FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE work a liated with the Program in COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE VPL Summer Research Grants OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOMValues DEMOCRACYSOCIETY and Public INDIVIDUALITY Life, PLURALITY most COMMUNITY related CITIZEN NATION to IDENTITY the ETHICS theme MODERNITY of RESPONSIBILITY Rights OBLIGATION and CONSEQUENTIALISMLaw LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORYThe RULES FAIRNESS Program UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS in JUSTICE Values COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURALand LAW IMPERATIVE Public SENTIMENTS FREEDOM Life DEMOCRACY SOCIETYoffers INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY competitive COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS summer MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY grants OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS4:30 FREEDOMp.m. DEMOCRACY Keynote SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY speaker: PLURALITY COMMUNITY Je rey CITIZEN Wieser NATION IDENTITY ETHICS74 MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY DUTY SUPEREROGATORYNATURAL RULES LAWFAIRNESS IMPERATIVE UTILITY OBLIGATION RECIPROCITY SENTIMENTS RULES FAIRNESS FREEDOM EQUALITY DEMOCRACY JUSTICE SOCIETY COMPASSION INDIVIDUALITY CASUISTRY PLURALITY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITYfor COMMUNITY students CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITYenrolled CASUISTRY OBLIGATION in CONSEQUENTIALISM the LAWundergraduate EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS certifi UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULEScate FAIRNESS EQUALITY program JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURALto LAW IMPERATIVEpursue OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHTPresident WRONG DUTY RULES andFAIRNESS CEOUTILITY RECIPROCITY of Homes RULES FAIRNESS with EQUALITY Hope, JUSTICE on the challenge of homelessness COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTSCONSEQUENTIALISM FREEDOM DEMOCRACY LAW EQUALITY SOCIETY RIGHT WRONG WRONG INDIVIDUALITY DUTY SUPEREROGATORY PLURALITY COMMUNITY RULES FAIRNESS CITIZEN UTILITYNATION RECIPROCITYIDENTITY ETHICS RULES MODERNITY FAIRNESS RESPONSIBILITY EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURALvalues-related LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY internships INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY or CITIZEN research NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY projects. RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM These LAW EQUALITY grants RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY may RULES be FAIRNESS UTILITYused RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITYSOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITYDUTY SUPEREROGATORY PLURALITY RULES COMMUNITY FAIRNESS CITIZEN UTILITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICSfor MODERNITY travel, RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY housing OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM or LAW EQUALITYother RIGHT WRONG DUTYpurposes SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS inUTILITY RECIPROCITYsupport RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE of COMPASSION students’ CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE work. OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES5:30 FAIRNESS UTILITYp.m. RECIPROCITY Reception RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY and JUSTICE dinner COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY SOCIETYNATURAL INDIVIDUALITYLAW IMPERATIVE PLURALITY OBLIGATION COMMUNITY SENTIMENTS CITIZEN FREEDOM NATION DEMOCRACY IDENTITY ETHICS SOCIETY MODERNITY INDIVIDUALITY RESPONSIBILITY PLURALITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESSPlease UTILITY RECIPROCITY RSVP RULES FAIRNESSfor the EQUALITY dinner JUSTICE COMPASSION in advance CASUISTRY to [email protected] IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAWBrendan OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYBertagnoll SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY ’13 COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International AffairsRECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NA DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY ULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW QUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURALprinted LAW on recycledIMPERATIVE paper OBLIGATION Produced SENTIMENTS by the Of FREEDOM ce of Communications DEMOCRACY SOCIETY 26642PS-12 INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYCE SION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY WRONG INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVECopyright OBLIGATION © 2012 by SENTIMENTSThe Trustees FREEDOM of Princeton DEMOCRACY University SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACYSOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY Bruce Easop ’13 INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITYCOMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION ID SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES Department of Politics FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITYRULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNIT CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION CONSEQUENTIALISM LAW EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY COMMUNITY CITIZEN NATION IDENTITY ETHICS MODERNITY RESPONSIBILITY CASUISTRY OBLIGATION EQUALITY RIGHT WRONG DUTY SUPEREROGATORY RULES FAIRNESS UTILITY RECIPROCITY RULES FAIRNESS EQUALITY JUSTICE COMPASSION CASUISTRY NATURAL LAW IMPERATIVE OBLIGATION SENTIMENTS FREEDOM DEMOCRACY SOCIETY INDIVIDUALITY PLURALITY Jacob Nebel ’13 Department of Philosophy

Alice Su ’13 Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs 24 Teaching and Learning

Values in Public Life: In Their Own Words

“I was blown away by the VPL senior thesis presentations. There were so many interesting projects — from anthropology to religion to philosophy — and the “Robert Weissman, the president of Public Citizen, challenged us students’ feedback to each other to think critically about political issues like the recent Citizens was excellent. I also enjoyed the United ruling and access to antiretrovirals in Africa. He offered an opportunity to give feedback on projects alternative perspective on these political issues and placed value in which I wouldn’t normally be involved.”

on the interests of workers and citizens, rather than corporations. — Elizabeth Harman, Associate Professor of Philosophy and the Meeting with him was thought-provoking and engaging.” University Center for Human Values, on the VPL senior thesis workshops — Evan Larson ’13, on a VPL trip to Washington, D.C.

“After re-imagining for us the wide-ranging “The VPL Conference provided me with an opportunity to path that had led her to her current work, share my academic interests as they relate to values and Ms. Gueron provided us with a sincere public life and also hear from my peers who have distinct interests account of the issues faced by those who from mine. I benefitted greatly from the keynote speaker who practice law in the public sector. Ms. shared the importance of ethical issues and how he integrates his Gueron’s account was inspiring, values into his present career.”

disabusing many of us of cynical stereotypes — Cristina Martinez ’12, on the VPL conference about work for the government, and convincing us that public values and ethics hold an important and esteemed position in this realm.”

— Bonita Robinson ’12, on a VPL conversation with Nicole Gueron, Clarick Gueron Reisbaum LLP Teaching and Learning 25

Clockwise from left: The April 20 VPL conference; from left, Trace Feng ’12, Cristina Martinez ’12 and Jennifer Asare ’12; Jeffrey Wieser, Homes with Hope

Senior Thesis Prize VPL Conversations Each year, the center awards prizes to the senior theses that make an September 20 outstanding contribution to the study of human values. Nominations for Philip Pettit, Politics and University Center for Human Values the prize are made by departments across the University.

September 27 Emily Rutherford Adina Roskies, Dartmouth College and Laurance S. Rockefeller Department of History Visiting Fellow “John Addington Symonds: Humanism, Love and Sexual Identity in Victorian Britain” October 17 Adviser: Anthony Grafton, History Nicole Gueron, Clarick Gueron Reisbaum LLP Jonathan Sarnoff December 6 Department of Philosophy Cynthia Farrar, Purple States “A Theory of Moral Responsibility” December 16 Adviser: Elizabeth Harman, Philosophy and University Center for Human Values Field trip to Washington, D.C., visiting: Quentin Wodon, The World Bank Jane Abbottsmith Nick Allard, Patton Boggs Department of Religion Martin Gruenberg, Acting Commissioner, Federal Deposit “A Dwelling for the Abandoned: Love for God and Neighbor Insurance Corporation in St. Augustine’s Homilies on the First Epistle of John” Paul Sarbanes, Retired United States Senator Adviser: Eric Gregory, Religion Robert Weissman, Public Citizen

February 7 Christine Bader, Duke University Top-Up Prizes

February 23 The University Center for Human Values offers prizes to help attract David Miller, University of Oxford Princeton graduate students whose work explicitly focuses on ethics, political theory and human values. In spring 2012, 19 students were awarded these grants. 26 Teaching and Learning

Investigating the meaning of honor By Jane Abbottsmith ’12

A session of the VPL seminar “The Life of Honor,” which focused on changing conceptions of honor, from the individual to national understandings of the term

“The Life of Honor” is one of those courses that have kept me discuss the duel in England, honor killing in the Mediterranean thinking long beyond Dean’s Date. The course, taught in fall 2011 and foot binding in China. by Professor Anthony Appiah, was an investigation into ideals of honor in a number of cultures. Beginning with the epic world of Throughout the course, one of the questions that remained on the Homer’s “Odyssey,” we explored honor in ancient warfare and the table was the distinction between systems of honor and systems of heroism (or cowardice) of Achilles and Hector. We moved on to morality. Today we often collapse the two into a single notion of Teaching and Learning 27

integrity, a tendency Professor Appiah gestures to in the title of his VPL Seminars book “The Honor Code.” While the Princeton honor code was the The VPL junior and senior seminars aim to cultivate students’ abilities fi rst topic of discussion, we quickly realized that the ideals of honor to analyze, criticize and construct systematic arguments about values codes and the standards of moral codes are, in fact, separable. in public life. While the seminars vary considerably in their thematic Honor, and its opposite, shame, are matters of reputation and are content, they are linked by a common pedagogical purpose and an approach that emphasizes intensive small group discussion and therefore uniquely public. Morality, on the other hand, is often advanced writing exercises. The seminars provide an explicit link an individual and private matter, a code that one adheres to even between the core coursework of the certifi cate and the independent work requirement. without an audience; its opposite is guilt, not shame. The Life of Honor In engaging with Professor Appiah’s book — and in our many PHI 365/CHV 365 Kwame Anthony Appiah, Philosophy and University Center discussions with the author in class — we honed our defi nition of for Human Values honor and distinguished between various types of honor, such as honor of esteem based on merit and honor of recognition based Explaining Values on title or position. Understanding these nuances allowed us to PHI 380/CHV 380 Victoria McGeer, University Center for Human Values discern how honor can be won and lost, and it ultimately allowed us to anticipate how changes in a system of honor might infl uence Morals, Markets and Health a society’s customs and traditions. CHV 391/PHI 391 Kristi Olson, University Center for Human Values

Moral Confl icts in Public and Private Life Selected reading list for the course POL 416/CHV 416 “The Life of Honor” Stephen Macedo, Politics and University Center for Human Values

“Charge Touching Duels” Indigenous Peoples and Historic Injustice Francis Bacon POL 417/CHV 417 Anna Stilz, Politics “The Economy of Esteem: An Essay on Civil and Political Society” Geoffrey Brennan and Philip Pettit

“Honour in African History” John Iliffe

“The Duel in European History: Honour and the Reign of Aristocracy” V.G. Kiernan

“Culture of Honor: The Psychology of Violence in the South” Richard E. Nisbett and Dov Cohen

“Honour and Shame: The Values of Mediterranean Society” John George Peristiany 28 Teaching and Learning

Exploring the ethics of creation By Elizabeth Harman, Associate Professor of Philosophy and the University Center for Human Values

This past spring I taught a new freshman seminar called issue and developing arguments and responses to go beyond “Designing Life: The Ethics of Creation and Its Control.” their gut reactions. Throughout the semester, the 13 enrolled students and I discussed a variety of topics, including the permissibility of genetic One of the highlights of the semester was the class debate, in enhancement and selection, the question of whether creating which each person either argued against or defended the claim someone can actually harm her, the ethics of abortion, the ethics that abortion is morally wrong if the fetus has the moral status of a of stem cell research and whether it’s ever permissible to bring person. I let them lead the discussion, and I was impressed by how another person into existence. well developed the arguments were.

Although these are controversial questions on which people have At the semester’s conclusion, the students remarked that thinking strong emotions, the students approached each conversation through philosophical arguments was difficult, but it taught them maturely and carefully, striving to see the many sides of each to think critically about moral issues that are often popularly discussed in an indiscriminate manner.

The freshman seminar “Designing Life: The Ethics of Creation and Its Control,” taught by Elizabeth Harman (third from left), philosophy and University Center for Human Values Teaching and Learning 29

Exploring the ethics of creation By Elizabeth Harman, Associate Professor of Philosophy and the University Center for Human Values

Freshman Seminars

Individuality as an Ideal Kwame Anthony Appiah, Philosophy and University Center for Human Values University Center for Human Values Freshman Seminar

Designing Life: The Ethics of Creation and Its Control Elizabeth Harman, Philosophy and University Center for Human Values Dean Eva Gossman Freshman Seminar in Human Values

Can Virtue Be Taught? Erika Kiss, University Center for Human Values Kurt and Beatrice Gutmann Freshman Seminar in Human Values

Reading Plato’s Republic Melissa Lane, Politics Professor Amy Gutmann Freshman Seminar in Human Values Students in the “Designing Life” freshman seminar The Politics of Rights Michael McCann, Law and Public Affairs Paul L. Miller ’41 Freshman Seminar in Human Values

Reconciliation: The Politics of Forgiveness in a Global Age Arzoo Osanloo, Law and Public Affairs Peter T. Joseph ’72 Freshman Seminar in Human Values

Roads Not Taken: The American Search for Social Justice Alan Ryan, Politics Class of 1976 Freshman Seminar in Human Values

Liberalism and Religion Paul Sigmund, Politics University Center for Human Values Freshman Seminar 30 Teaching and Learning

Bringing light into Plato’s cave By Marc Fleurbaey, Robert E. Kuenne Professor in Economics and Humanistic Studies; Professor of Public Affairs and the University Center for Human Values

Editor’s note: Marc Fleurbaey joined the Princeton faculty in September Public policies and social institutions can be analyzed from many 2011 with a joint appointment in the University Center for Human different angles, but evaluating their performance always involves Values and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International normative considerations. While experts and scholars are not Affairs, culminating a multiyear cooperative effort of the two units to supposed to mix their own prejudices with their analyses, they enhance the ethical dimension of the curriculum in public policy. In should be aware of the normative perspectives that are brought this introductory note, Fleurbaey describes his areas of research and to bear on the issues. More ambitiously even, they can contribute teaching interests. to clarifying the underpinnings of the debates. Philosophers and economists, in particular, have jointly developed a corpus of

Left to right, from above: Frank Jackson, philosophy; Peter Singer, University Center for Human Values; postdoctoral research associate Kristi Olson; and Marc Fleurbaey Teaching and Learning 31

A center seminar led by Marc Fleurbaey in fall 2011 concepts in social ethics that connects basic principles such as Marc Fleurbaey freedom, equality and responsibility with concrete schemes of distribution, social welfare criteria and various measurement tools. Research interests: Normative and public economics; theories of distributive justice; particular focus on the analysis of equality of opportunity and responsibility-sensitive egalitarianism and on seeking solutions to In my WWS 593H course, “Social Justice, Ethics and Public famous impossibilities of social choice theory Policy,” for the Master in Public Affairs, which I taught in fall 2011, the chain that goes from theories of justice to cost-benefi t analysis Positions: Joined Princeton in fall 2011; also a member of Collège d’études mondiales; previously at University Paris Descartes, University of or inequality indexes is unraveled, and the students learn that Pau and University of Cergy-Pontoise different criteria can be used, depending of how one measures well- being, how much priority is granted to the worse-off, or how one Recent publications: “A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare,” with F. connects the evaluation of a particular sphere of policy to general Maniquet (2011); “Fairness, Responsibility and Welfare” (2008); “Capitalisme ou démocratie? L’alternative du XXIe siècle” (2006) social welfare. My upcoming seminar for undergraduates will show how critical thinking about our society has been transformed by Education: Ph.D. in economics, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences the joint development of refi ned theories of the good society and a Sociales; maîtrise (master’s degree) in philosophy, University of Parix X better understanding of institutional possibilities. 32 Teaching and Learning

Exhibiting great teaching Excerpts from introductory remarks by Larry Temkin, Organizer, Master Teachers in Action: A Symposium on the Art of Teaching Philosophy and Political Theory; Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Professor for Distinguished Teaching

As this year’s Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Professor for be extracted. And I realized that we don’t do anything like this Distinguished Teaching, one of my responsibilities was to in academia. The closest we come is when one of our graduate undertake a project engaging faculty and graduate students, bearing students asks us for advice regarding teaching, and we basically say on the art and craft of teaching. I took the charge quite seriously, something like this: You’ve had tons of teachers in your life; think of and wondered if I could come up with a project that would not the best ones, and teach like them! merely have some “bearing” on the art and craft of teaching, but that might actually help promote better teaching, which I took to There must be a better way and this symposium is an attempt to be the real intent of the task I was being asked to fulfi ll. fi nd it. The main aim is to bring great teachers together to have them do what they do so well. What you will see and hear today As I thought about how best to do this, I realized how different isn’t talking about teaching, but teaching itself: each of our guests higher education is than certain other endeavors. In professional was asked to teach their favorite class, trying to do so as nearly as and college sports, athletes will spend hours watching videos, possible as they would actually teach their own students. Then we often with a coach, dissecting exactly what it is the best players will have a chance to ask questions not only about what they have are doing, trying to see how they might do better on game day. taught, but also how. In business schools, best practices are explored by looking at the most successful businesses and leaders to see what lessons might Teaching and Learning 33

Of course, to some extent great teachers, like great baseball hitters, are born and not made. But no matter how good or bad one naturally is as a teacher, there are tips and techniques that can make one even better, and I think many of those can be learned by watching, questioning and learning from master teachers in action. I hope I am right, and that by the end of the day you will agree.

As I have sat on various teaching committees, I have always marveled that every teaching-award winner seems to think that his, or her, class is the most important class in the world! I don’t really believe that every great teacher believes this in their heart of hearts. But they do all believe that what they are doing is important — really important — and that it’s worth working hard to be good at. I agree, which is why I’m so pleased and honored to be hosting Symposium panel addresses audience in Whig Hall today’s conference. Master Teachers in Action: A Symposium on the At left, Shelly Kagan, Yale Art of Teaching Philosophy and Political Theory University. Top right, visiting fellow Laurie Schrage. February 24 Below, Philip Pettit (center), politics and University Center “The Ethics of Political Action: Weber and Gandhi” for Human Values, and Alan J. Donald Moon, Wesleyan University Patten, politics “Weakness of the Will, Procrastination and Principles” Tamar Szabo Gendler, Yale University

“The Existence Requirement and the Badness of Death” Shelly Kagan, Yale University

Concluding panel: “Secrets, Keys and Importance of Great Teaching” 34 Teaching and Learning

Film series celebrates 10th season By Erika Kiss, Series Director; Associate Research Scholar

The University Center for Human Values Film Forum was Extra chairs are needed every Monday night in Rocky Theater, founded in the fall of 2005 with the generous support of Bert showing that the Film Forum has become a valued part G. Kerstetter ’66 and with the efforts of several professors of campus life that might continue for one thousand and who believed that intellectual life in our university could also one nights, and more. thrive outside of classrooms. The weekly forum brings together faculty, students and community members to view and discuss films in the best tradition of Socratic learning that is lifelong, Film Forum dialogical and, ultimately, self-examining. The careful selection The Film Forum convenes at the Rockefeller College theater for a film of challenging films for each season and the engagement screening followed by comments from Princeton faculty and lively discussion. The series is supported by a gift from Bert Kerstetter ’66 of our faculty discussants ensure that the Film Forum is an and is co-sponsored by the University Center for Human Values and outstanding educational experience that contributes to the Rockefeller College. emancipation of film as one of the liberal arts, while also Fall 2011: Top Ten providing intellectual entertainment. September 26 Each term we screen a dozen films pertaining to a different “The Cure” (1917) by Charlie Chaplin, with live accompaniment by Andrew Lovett dilemma, such as war, freedom, faith and coming of age. We investigate the films individually as well as in the context of how October 3 “Eyes Wide Shut” (1999) by Stanley Kubrick they relate to each other and to the common theme, beginning with dialogue between faculty members, and then inviting the October 10 audience members to join in. Throughout the years, our regular “Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown” (1988) by Pedro Almódovar members have acquired a deep knowledge of the large cinematic October 17 canon the Film Forum has forged in intense critical discourse, “Blue Velvet” (1986) by David Lynch which has also become more and more sophisticated. October 24 “East of Eden” (1955) by Elia Kazan By the end of the last academic year we had examined 107 November 7 difficult films in nine seasons. Last fall, when we were to start “Metropolis” (1927) by Fritz Lang our 10th season, we asked our community to vote for the 10 films November 14 they had seen since the forum’s inception that they would want to “Bicycle Thief” (1948) by Vittorio de Sica see again as an anniversary celebration of our Film Forum. More than 200 people voted, and the result made up the program of November 21 our 10th season titled “Top Ten (voted by Princetonians).” “Taxi Driver” (1976) by Martin Scorsese November 28 “The Seven Samurai” (1954) by Akira Kurosawa Teaching and Learning 35

December 5 “2001 Space Odyssey” (1968) by Stanley Kubrick

December 12 “La Dolce Vita” (1960) by Federico Fellini

Spring 2012: Original/Copy

February 6 “Funny Games” (2010) by Michael Haneke

February 13 “Beijing Bicycle” (2001) by Wang Xiaoshuai

February 20 “A Better Life” (2011) by Chris Weitz

February 27 Spring 2012 “The Hero” (2004) by Zeze Gamboa Film Forum The place where Princeton students, professors and townspeople March 5 see and discuss great films “The Cyclist” (1987) by Mohsen Makmalbaf Every Monday at 7 p.m. March 12 in Rocky Theater “Close-up” (1990) by Abbas Kiarostami

March 26 “Voyage to Italy” (1953) by Roberto Rossellini Original/CopyOriginal/Copy

February 6 February 27 March 26 April 16 April 2 Michael Haneke Zézé Gamboa Roberto Rossellini George Cukor Funny Games The Hero Voyage to Italy Gaslight “Certifi ed Copy” (2010) by Abbas Kiarostami 2010 2004 1953 1944 February 13 March 5 April 2 April 23 Wang Xiaoshuai Mohsen Makmalbaf Abbas Kiarostami Alfred Hitchcock April 9 Beijing Bicycle The Cyclist Certified Copy Vertigo 2001 1987 2010 1958

“F for Fake” (1974) by Orson Welles February 20 March 12 April 9 April 30 Chris Weitz Abbas Kiarostami Orson Welles Michael Haneke A Better Life Close-Up F for Fake Funny Games April 16 2011 1990 1974 1997 “Gaslight” (1944) by George Cukor The events are made possible by uchv.princeton.edu/undergraduate_programs/film_forum.php

the generous cosponsored gift of Bert G. Kerstetter ’66 by the University Center and Rockefeller April 23 for Human Values College

“Vertigo” (1958) by Alfred Hitchcock Produced by the Office of Communications 26415-12

April 30 “Funny Games” (1997) by Michael Haneke 36 Teaching and Learning

Broadening the discussion on human values By Benjamin Cogan ’12, President, Human Values Forum

The HVF student board initiated other changes this year as well. Though previous HVF dinners involved a faculty presentation and then a large group discussion, the current board instated a small group 20-minute discussion directly after the faculty presentation that allows for more intimate discussion. Second, because many dinner discussions were oversubscribed, we decided to accept students randomly as opposed to a “first-come, first-served” basis. Finally, we made a significant recruitment push this year, ensuring that almost all dinners were either near capacity or at capacity. Some of our most popular dinner discussions from the past year include a discussion of “Gross National Happiness” with Professor Peter Singer and Psychology Professor Daniel Kahneman, “Scientific Discourse and National Security” with President Shirley M. Tilghman, and “Just War Theory and Asymmetric Warfare” with Professor Michael Walzer of the Institute for Advanced Study. On a more personal note, I would like to thank the University Center for Human Values for sponsoring and supporting the Human Values Forum. Though I have been involved with many student groups and activities at my time at Princeton, there is none that I have been more grateful to be a part of than HVF. Benjamin Cogan ’12

Human Values Forum The Human Values Forum (HVF) exists as a uniquely Princeton With support from Bert Kerstetter ’66, the Human Values Forum provides an opportunity, bringing together undergraduate students and opportunity for approximately 50 students and 15 faculty members to meet faculty members into an informal setting to discuss the prevailing in an informal setting to discuss current and enduring questions concerning normative issues of the day. Though in previous years HFV had ethics and human values. They meet over dinner at 5 Ivy Lane most weeks during the academic year. met eight times a semester, increased student demand and the generosity of the University Center for Human Values and Bert Benjamin Cogan ’12, President • Colleen McCullough ’12, Vice President of Forum Relations • Max Siegel ’14, Vice President of Programming Kerstetter ’66 has allowed HVF to expand its offerings to 13 dinners a semester. This has enabled us to discuss issues more deeply, September 26 and fostered a stronger community. This year, we were able to “Gross National Happiness” Peter Singer, University Center for Human Values; Daniel Kahneman, discuss an incredibly diverse set of issues, from digital security and Psychology and Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs corporate personhood to estimating the value of a human life. Teaching and Learning 37

…a uniquely Princeton opportunity, bringing together undergraduate students and faculty members into an informal setting to discuss the prevailing normative issues of the day. — Benjamin Cogan ’12

October 3 November 28 “Culture and Criminal Defenses” “Moral Values and the University” Lawrence Rosen, Anthropology Evan Thomas, Council of the Humanities

October 10 December 5 “Free Will and Moral Responsibility” “The Philosophical Implications of Astrophysics” Gideon Rosen, Philosophy Neta Bahcall, Astrophysical Sciences

October 17 December 12 “Values and Interests in a Networked World” “Normative Dimensions of the Euro Crisis” Anne-Marie Slaughter, Politics and Woodrow Wilson School of Public Jan-Werner Mueller, Politics and International Affairs January 9 October 24 “Academic Tenure: Is It Necessary?” “Ethics and College Admissions” Anthony Grafton, History Janet Rapelye, Dean of Admission February 6 November 7 “Natural Law” “Grassroots Democracy” Robert George, Politics Jeffrey Stout, Religion February 13 November 14 ”Leadership Out Front and Behind the Scenes” “Global Governance” Nannerl Keohane, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Robert Keohane, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs and University Center for Human Values Affairs February 20 November 21 “Just War Theory and Asymmetric Warfare” “Estimating the Value of Life” Michael Walzer, Institute for Advanced Study Harvey Rosen, Economics February 27 “Genetics, Experience and Personal Identity” Samuel Wang, Molecular Biology and Princeton Neuroscience Institute 38 Teaching and Learning

Broadening the discussion on human values

Human Values Forum (continued) Environmental Affairs Forum

March 5 Students and scholars discuss environmental ethics and policy at the “Equal Membership, Religious Freedom and the Idea of a Homeland” Environmental Affairs Forum, supported by Bert Kerstetter ‘66, the Princeton Christopher Eisgruber, Provost, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and Environmental Institute, and the Program in Science, Technology and International Affairs, and University Center for Human Values Environmental Policy.

March 12 Alexandra Kolaski ’13, President • James Smits ’12, Vice President “Rethinking the Good: Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning” November 8 Larry Temkin, Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Professor for Distinguished “Climate Change Policy — Finding Our Bearings Again” Teaching Robert Socolow, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering March 26 November 15 “Moral Responsibility Without Awareness” “Communicating About Climate Change: Does Anyone Really George Sher, Rice University and Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Fellow Have a Clue?” April 2 Michael Lemonick, Astrophysical Sciences, Freshman Seminars and Princeton Environmental Institute “Are Corporations Persons?” Philip Pettit, Politics and University Center for Human Values November 29 April 9 “Remaking American Environmentalism” Jenny Price, American Studies “The Idea of Human Rights” Charles Beitz, Politics and University Center for Human Values December 13 April 16 “Using the Campus as a Laboratory for Sustainability Study” Shana Weber, Office of Sustainability “Privacy and Security in the Digital Age” Brian Kernighan, Computer Science February 21 April 23 “The Ecological Consequences of Antibiotic Resistance” Ramanan Laxminarayan, Princeton Environmental Institute “Scientific Discourse and National Security: The H5N1 Case” Shirley M. Tilghman, Princeton University President and Molecular Biology February 28 April 30 “Biogeochemical Processes for Water and Soil Remediation” Peter Jaffe, Civil and Environmental Engineering “Do I Make a Difference? Negligibility and Climate Change” Melissa Lane, Politics March 5 May 7 “Food Security Challenges” Eckart Woertz, Princeton Environmental Institute and “Religion, Ethics and Global Poverty” Near Eastern Studies Eric Gregory, Religion April 3 “The Buffalo Commons and Its Urban Implications” Frank Popper, Civil and Environmental Engineering and Princeton Environmental Institute

April 17 “Sea Level Changes — Past and Present” Adam Maloof and Frederik Simons, Geosciences Teaching and Learning 39

Cross-listed Courses

Introduction to Moral Philosophy Stolen Years: Youth Under the Nazis in World War II PHI 202/CHV 202 COM 362/CHV 362/JDS 362 Gilbert Harman, Philosophy Froma Zeitlin, Comparative Literature

The Other Side of Rome The Life of Honor CLA 214/CHV 214 PHI 365/CHV 365 Andrew Feldherr, Classics Kwame Anthony Appiah, Philosophy and University Center for Human Values Meaning and Morality CHV 258/PHI 258 Explaining Values Larry Temkin, Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Professor for Distinguished PHI 380/CHV 380 Teaching, University Center for Human Values Victoria McGeer, Philosophy and University Center for Human Values

Christian Ethics and Modern Society Morals, Markets and Health REL 261/CHV 261 CHV 391/PHI 391 Eric Gregory, Religion Kristi Olson, University Center for Human Values

Ethics and Public Policy Moral Confl icts in Public and Private Life WWS 301/POL 308/CHV 301 POL 416/CHV 416 Stephen Macedo, Politics and University Center for Human Values Stephen Macedo, Politics and University Center for Human Values

Democratic Theory Indigenous Peoples and Historic Injustice POL 306/PHI 360/CHV 306 POL 417/CHV 417 Philip Pettit, Politics and University Center for Human Values Anna Stilz, Politics

Practical Ethics Seminar in Normative Ethics CHV 310/PHI 385 PHI 419/CHV 419 Peter Singer, University Center for Human Values Kwame Anthony Appiah, Philosophy and University Center for Human Values Systematic Ethics PHI 307/CHV 311 Comparative Constitutional Law Sarah McGrath and Michael Smith, Philosophy WWS 470/POL 391/CHV 470 Gabor Halmai, Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies; Greek Ethical Theory Kim Lane Scheppele, Sociology, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and PHI 335/CHV 335 International Affairs, and University Center for Human Values John Cooper, Philosophy Cases, Histories, Case-Histories The Enlightenment in France CHV 576/COM 576 FRE 351/CHV 351 Peter Brooks, Comparative Literature and University Center Natasha Lee, French and Italian for Human Values 40 SUPPORTING RESEARCH

Advancing scholarship through collaboration

The Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Faculty Fellows program annually attracts a select group of scholars from other universities to devote a year in residence at the University Center for Human Values to a research and writing project on a topic involving human values in public and private life. The program is one means by which the center seeks to advance scholarship in its areas of interest. While in Princeton, in addition to working on their research projects, the visiting fellows typically participate in a range of events on campus including lectures, seminars and colloquia, and they frequently develop intellectual relationships with Princeton faculty members and graduate students. In these ways the program enriches the life of the campus as well as Clockwise from above: Kwame supporting important research. Anthony Appiah, philosophy and University Center for Human Values (left), visiting fellow Laurie Schrage, A main feature of the fellows program is a regular lunch seminar at and Victoria McGeer, University Center for Human Values; which our visitors and the center’s faculty members present work in postdoctoral research associate Kristi Olson (left) and Charles Beitz, progress to an audience of peers. Usually a commentator introduces politics and University Center for the discussion. As the reports on the following pages attest, many Human Values; an LSR fellows’ lunch seminar session find the criticism and discussion of their work in this forum to be one of the most significant benefits of the fellowship. Supporting Research 41

Research Reports

Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Professor Laurance S. Rockefeller (LSR) for Distinguished Teaching Visiting Fellows

This professorship is part of the 250th Anniversary Visiting These fellowships are awarded annually to outstanding scholars Professorships for Distinguished Teaching program. Each faculty and teachers interested in devoting a year in residence at Princeton visitor teaches an undergraduate course and engages in other writing about ethics and human values, discussing their work in a activities aimed at improving teaching at Princeton. fellows seminar, and participating in seminar activities.

Larry Temkin, Professor of Philosophy Ben Bradley, Associate Professor of at Rutgers University Philosophy at Syracuse University I started my time at Princeton by fi nishing During my time at Princeton I wrote a my book project, “Rethinking the Good: paper, “Harms, Causes and Deontology,” Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical which I presented at the LSR seminar and Reasoning” (2012), wrote a paper on at several other universities, and which is Derek Parfi t’s “On What Matters,” fi nished part of an ongoing research project on the an article on equality of opportunity for nature of harm and its role in deontological Blackwell’s “International Encyclopedia moral theory. I fi nished co-editing the of Philosophy” and started two new research avenues related to “Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of problems of infi nity and global priority setting in health care. I Death,” which should appear in late 2012 or early 2013. I also gave many lectures at Princeton, including talks for the center, the wrote a proposal, which was accepted, for a book on well-being Center for Health and Wellbeing, the Human Values Forum and for Polity Press and I have begun work on that project. I also Stephen Macedo’s “Ethics and Public Policy” class. I also organized began work on two new projects: a paper on objective theories of “Master Teachers in Action: A Symposium on the Art of Teaching well-being for the “Cambridge Companion to Consequentialism” Philosophy and Political Theory” (see page 32), taught a seminar and a paper on the value of wildness for an edited volume on on meaning and morality, advised a junior paper and served as a consequentialism and environmental ethics. Throughout the year resource for two senior thesis projects. Best of all, I made many I attended many events, such as Liz Harman’s moral philosophy new friends across the University, and attended many interesting seminar, political philosophy and bioethics talks, the Rutgers value symposiums and lectures connected with the center. I had a truly theory reading group, ethics conferences in Madison and Tucson wonderful year. and the Pacifi c American Philosophical Association (APA) annual meeting in Seattle. 42 Supporting Research

Research Reports

Emily Brady, Reader in the Institute and, most importantly, made significant progress on my new of Geography and Academic project on human rights. I wrote two papers on the issue discussing Associate in Philosophy at University whether there is a human right to democracy, and two more on of Edinburgh foundational issues concerning the relations between human rights, My main accomplishment was completing capabilities, power and human dignity. I audited two graduate the second half of the draft of my book, seminars (one led by Charles Beitz and Anna Stilz, and the other “The Sublime in Modern Philosophy: by Stephen Macedo), from which I learned a great deal. I also Aesthetics, Ethics and Nature” had innumerable occasions to interact with Princeton faculty, (forthcoming 2013), and I began a students and other LSR visiting fellows. I participated in many new project, “Aesthetics of Nature: A Philosophical History,” workshops, seminars and informal conversations. The members benefitting in particular from discussions with the center’s faculty of the administrative staff were kind and efficient. The University and fellows about narrowing the project to the 18th century. I also Center for Human Values is an academic powerhouse, and I am completed papers on aesthetic and moral value in Adam Smith’s immensely grateful for the stimulus it gave me! “Theory of Moral Sentiments” and on the role of imagination in Immanuel Kant’s aesthetics of nature. My paper for the LSR Kinch Hoekstra, Associate Professor seminar addressed a more contemporary topic, “Aesthetic Value, of Political Science at University Ethics and Climate Change,” for which I received invaluable of California, Berkeley; Professor of Law at University of California, comments. I enjoyed various events at the center and beyond, Berkeley, School of Law attending talks and participating in Princeton’s “Communicating Uncertainty: Science, Institutions and Ethics in the Politics of I worked primarily on three projects as an Global Climate Change” project. I also presented my work at LSR fellow. One was background work for several conferences. I cannot thank the center’s staff, faculty and a monograph on the use of Thucydides in fellows enough for such a congenial and stimulating environment Renaissance and early modern thought, for research and discussion. mostly as an authority to support criticism or justification of preventive war and imperial expansion, and I focused on Lutheran Pablo Gilabert, Associate Professor and Calvinist humanists who articulated just war theories. Another of Philosophy at Concordia project was an article on Thomas Hobbes’ conception of equality, University to appear in “Hobbes Today,” edited by S. A. Lloyd (forthcoming). My time at Princeton was tremendously The third project focused on challenges to Jean Bodin’s theory productive. I made the final corrections of sovereignty, and how those criticisms did and did not apply to of my book manuscript “From Global Hobbes’ later theory, which drew heavily on Bodin. I learned much Poverty to Global Equality: A Philosophical from the other LSR fellows, and the “structure of expectations” Exploration” (2012), wrote three reference ensured an ideal balance between providing the stimulus of an articles for the Cambridge Rawls Lexicon, outstanding intellectual group while allowing attention to be Supporting Research 43

focused on our individual projects. I took advantage of some of three of which are forthcoming and two of which are currently Princeton’s resources, including the Firestone Library, offerings under review. In addition, I completed two papers on related of the Program in Law and Public Affairs (LAPA), and seminars in epistemological questions, which I expect to submit for publication the departments of philosophy and politics. shortly. My work on these topics benefi ted a great deal from the other members of the center and from the Princeton faculty and Adina Roskies, Associate Professor graduate students. In a more historical vein, I also completed an of Philosophy at Dartmouth College essay on Hume’s conception of practical reason for the “Oxford This year I began a new project on Handbook on David Hume” and an essay on Kant’s moral theory developing a positive naturalistic account that will appear in a volume of recent work on Kant that I am co- of agency and presented a new paper on editing. Beyond this, I also regularly sat in on graduate seminars the topic to the LSR fellows. In addition, with Liz Harman, Tom Kelly and Michael Smith. I co-authored a paper with Michael Shadlen that was published in Frontiers in George Sher, the Herbert S. Autrey Decision Science, wrote and submitted a Professor of Philosophy at Rice paper to Current Opinion in Neurobiology and wrote a draft of a University paper with Bertram Malle that is to be published in Philosophical During my stay at Princeton, I wrote Explorations. I wrote drafts of several chapters of a book on three of the nine chapters of my book neuroimaging and fi nished editing a book manuscript. I also gave “Equality for Inegalitarians,” which is talks at Princeton in the Ira W. DeCamp Bioethics Seminars series under contract with Cambridge University and the Neural Science of Decision Making series, and was a Press and near completion. I also wrote a visiting speaker in two undergraduate classes. I gave more than 15 paper titled “Perfectionism and Equality: other talks over the course of year. I audited Michael Smith’s and Further Thoughts,” which will be published Gideon Rosen’s graduate courses and made an effort to meet other together with a number of essays on my earlier book “Beyond philosophers and neuroscientists, to make the most of being at Neutrality: Perfectionism and Politics” in the journal Ethical Princeton and at the center. Perspectives. In addition, I fi nished work on a new anthology titled “Ethics: Essential Readings in Moral Theory” (2012). I attended Karl Schafer, Assistant Professor of many talks, seminars and symposia, all of extremely high quality, Philosophy at University of Pittsburgh and I learned a lot from them. Immensely benefi cial, too, were the I had a wonderfully stimulating and numerous opportunities to talk informally with other fellows and productive time at the center. It’s hard to permanent members of the Princeton community about my own imagine a better environment for creative work and theirs, and the chance to do the kind of sustained reading philosophical activity. I completed fi ve that a full teaching load makes impossible. It’s been a terrifi c year, papers related to my primary project and I’m very grateful to the center for making it possible. on moral disagreement and relativism, 44 Supporting Research

Research Reports

Laurie Shrage, Professor of Harold T. Shapiro Postdoctoral Research Philosophy and Director of the Associate in Bioethics Women’s Studies Center at Florida International University This fellowship, endowed by William K. Fung ’70, enables the My primary project at Princeton was to center to appoint a postdoctoral research associate to pursue generate several papers examining public research in bioethics for a term of one to three years and to teach and scholarly debates about reforming one course each year. legal marriage. I presented “Marriage in a Free Society” in the LSR seminar, received Kristi Olson extremely useful feedback, and submitted In the second year of my fellowship, the paper for publication. I wrote “Is Marriage Bad for Children?” I continued my project asking, first, for an invited Pacific APA session on parenting, and a commentary whether liberal egalitarians can endorse an on polygamy for another APA session. I also completed a unconditional right to health care consistent substantial update of my “Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” with denying the right to a basic income entry, “Feminist Perspectives on Sex Markets,” and finished and, second, whether we have the right to revisions on a forthcoming article, “Anatomy Is Not Destiny: Sexual a basic income. I produced three papers Orientation and Gender Variance.” I attended many seminars on the topic that are under review or at the center and LAPA and served as a commentator at several, forthcoming. Other highlights of the year including the Film Forum. What I most enjoyed was the quality include commenting on Sarah Conly’s paper, “One Child: Do We of discussion following any talk given here. The expertise of the Really Have the Right to More?”; participating in a consultation faculty and visitors, and the seriousness and generosity with which group on the global burden of disease; teaching my undergraduate they approach scholarship, was most evident at these moments. seminar, “Morals, Markets and Health”; the LSR seminar; my I especially benefited from discussing my work with Stephen interactions with the LSR fellows and Princeton faculty; and the Macedo, who is currently writing on the future of marriage. center’s frequent talks. I am extremely grateful to the center’s staff and faculty for their generous help and kindness. Supporting Research 45

Graduate Prize Fellows

From left to right, GPF Tom Dannenbaum; GPF Padraic Scanlan; GPF William Evans; GPF Ross Lerner; GPF Jessica Lowe; Philip Pettit, politics and University Center for Human Values; Anthony Appiah, philosophy and University Center for Human Values; GPF Melissa Moschella; GPF Molly Farneth; GPF Barry Maguire; GPF Elias Sacks; and GPF Michael Lamb

These fellowships, made possible by a gift from Laurance S. Anthony Appiah. In my dissertation, I argue that the moral Rockfeller ’32, are awarded to Princeton graduate students meaning of a soldier’s actions in war is a function of both the jus with distinguished academic records who show great promise in bello (justice of conduct in war) and the jus ad bellum (just war of contributing to scholarship and teaching about ethics and theory); however, the ethical status of a war will often be unclear, human values. and this uncertainty is diffi cult to reconcile with the moral gravity of killing. The dissertation struggles with what this means for the Tom Dannenbaum, Department of Politics soldier’s moral integrity and the state’s relationship to its soldiers. My year as a Graduate Prize Fellow (GPF) has been a joy. The diversity of perspectives in this group made for edifying discussions William Evans, Department of English on a varied range of topics. I benefi tted from the opportunity to My fellowship allowed me to make some important inquiries present in the GPF workshop and from the feedback I received about the central questions and structure of my dissertation. As a from the other fellows and from our leaders, Philip Pettit and result, I have a tentative outline for the thesis, as well as a plan to 46 Supporting Research

Research Reports

complete a draft of it by spring 2013. I completed a draft of a first communities can help citizens cultivate this virtue. The fellowship chapter; delivered two conference papers, the material of which has enabled me to make significant progress on this research in I plan to integrate into my dissertation; and am now at work on the context of a strong, charitable and collegial interdisciplinary a second chapter. The GPF seminar was consistently stimulating community. Led by Phillip Pettit and Anthony Appiah, the GPF and convivial, and the need to present my work to an intellectually workshop has sparked some of the most interesting conversations capacious audience helped me find clearer and more broadly of my time at Princeton. It has also created a sense of community appealing ways to frame my interests. I am especially grateful for that, I trust, will continue long after the fellowship has ended. the opportunity to be acquainted with the other fellows and our seminar leaders Philip Pettit and Anthony Appiah; they were warm, Ross Lerner, Department of English insightful and supportive interlocutors. The fellowship has been very useful during this academic year. It gave me the time to write two dissertation chapters from my Molly Farneth, Department of Religion project, “Framing Fanaticism: Religion, Violence and the Literature I am grateful to the center for an incredibly rewarding fellowship of Self-Annihilation Across the Reformation”; to make progress year. I made substantial progress on my dissertation, which on research for another chapter; and to compose and present focuses on ethical conflict and religious practice in G.W.F. Hegel’s three different conference papers. Additionally, I presented to “Phenomenology of Spirit.” I argue that Hegel provides an agonistic the GPF seminar materials from a dissertation chapter that I am account of social and political life, in which ethical conflicts are revising (“Thomas Hobbes’ Biblical Philology and the Fanatic as continually emerging, confronted through social and religious Reader”) and received extremely challenging and useful questions practices, and overcome without domination or the destruction of in response; the other seminar participants have stimulated new the community. This reading of Hegel contributes to contemporary directions in my work on Hobbes. I also had a chance to act as conversations regarding the nature of religious and ethical conflicts, respondent to Elias Sacks’ excellent presentation on Mendelssohn. the role of shared practices in confronting such conflicts and, I found all the presentations and my conversations with the fellows more broadly, the relationship between religion and political life. and our faculty leaders richly stimulating. I presented my work in the interdisciplinary GPF seminar, which was excellent throughout the year, thanks to a wonderful cohort Jessica Lowe, Department of History of fellows and the leadership of Philip Pettit and Anthony Appiah. I concentrated on writing and revising my dissertation, “Murder in the Shenandoah,” which explores criminal law and republican law Michael Lamb, Department of Politics reform in Virginia after the American Revolution. The dissertation In my dissertation, “Hope: A Democratic Virtue,” I examine the focuses on a 1791 murder and its path through Virginia’s court recent rhetoric of hope in politics and argue that hope is best system. In the process, it de-centers traditional dichotomies that conceived as a virtue, particularly a democratic virtue, that diverse have characterized the region’s history — state and local, east and citizens can share. After constructing this theoretical account west, gentry and non-gentry — to reveal how the new nation’s with the help of Aquinas, Augustine, Dewey and others, I analyze most politically and legally influential state was, in the critical era the various ways that particular institutions, organizations and of the 1790s, a world in motion. Thanks to the center’s support, I Supporting Research 47

also converted one chapter into an article, “Guarding Republican Elias Sacks, Department of Religion Liberty: St. George Tucker and Judging in Republican Virginia,” This year I completed my dissertation on the conception of Jewish which will appear in fall 2012. Being a GPF was one of my best practice developed by Moses Mendelssohn, an 18th-century experiences at Princeton. philosopher known as the founder of modern Jewish thought. Drawing on his well-known German writings, his little-known Barry Maguire, Department of Philosophy Hebrew texts and neglected developments in early modern I had an edifying and thoroughly enjoyable year as a GPF. I thought, I proposed a new reading of Mendelssohn’s work, arguing learned a great deal from the opportunity to explain my research that his account of Jewish practice was a response to his views on to a room full of interested nonspecialists. On the basis of the the nature of history, and that such a reading can contribute to comments I received, I rewrote a paper that won the best paper broader conversations about modernity and religion. I defended award at a conference a few months later. We had an excellent mix my dissertation in July, and am beginning a position as an assistant of students from different fi elds: enough breadth that everyone professor in religious studies at the University of Colorado- was able to make a distinctively informed contribution to our Boulder. The fellowship has offered me the opportunity to discuss discussions, but not so much that we were talking past each other. my research with colleagues in diverse fi elds — for which I am Everyone seemed to benefi t a great deal from the discussions deeply grateful. following their own presentations. My dissertation took shape this year, and I am currently putting the fi nishing touches to my writing Padraic Scanlan, Department of History sample and job talk to go on the market this fall. Thanks to the center, I had the time and the resources to draft nearly fi ve chapters of my dissertation this academic year. The Melissa Moschella, Department of Politics GPF seminar was a welcome opportunity to explore how other During my time as a fellow I completed the last few chapters of disciplines confront ethical and moral questions. My colleagues my dissertation on parental rights in education, which I defended were impressive and subtle scholars; getting to know their work in June. My dissertation aims to provide a principled defense and participating in conversations with them was an honor and of parental rights as negative rights that carve out a sphere of an education. Our conversations have inoculated me against the sovereignty within which parents can fulfi ll their childrearing disciplinary tunnel vision that comes with writing a dissertation. obligations in accordance with the dictates of their consciences. My fi nished product will be much better for it; certainly, the This year my work focused on exploring and attempting to resolve chapter I presented in an early draft improved thanks to my the possible tension between parental rights and the interests colleagues’ insightful comments. I am very grateful to the center of the state in educating children for citizenship in a pluralistic for the support, to Professors Pettit and Appiah for leading the democratic society. The feedback that I received on my work in seminar, and to the other fellows for a lively and productive the GPF seminar helped me to develop and improve my core academic year. arguments, and having the opportunity to learn about the other fellows’ projects was an enriching and rewarding experience. 48 PEOPLE

People

Faculty Erika Kiss Director, University Center for Human Values Film Forum; Kwame Anthony Appiah Associate Research Scholar in the University Center Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Philosophy and the for Human Values University Center for Human Values Stephen Macedo Charles Beitz Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Politics and the University Director, University Center for Human Values; Edwards S. Sanford Center for Human Values Professor of Politics Victoria McGeer Peter Brooks Research Scholar, University Center for Human Values Lecturer with the Rank of Professor in Comparative Literature and the University Center for Human Values; Laurance S. Rockefeller Philip Pettit Visiting Professor of Distinguished Teaching (2012-13) Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Politics and the University Center for Human Values Christopher Eisgruber Provost; Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Public Affairs in Kim Lane Scheppele the Woodrow Wilson School and the University Center for Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Sociology and International Human Values Affairs and the University Center for Human Values

Marc Fleurbaey Peter Singer Robert E. Kuenne Professor in Economics and Humanistic Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics in the University Center Studies; Professor of Public Affairs and the University Center for for Human Values Human Values

Elizabeth Harman Executive Committee Associate Professor of Philosophy and the University Center for Kwame Anthony Appiah Human Values; Laurance S. Rockefeller University Preceptor Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Philosophy Nannerl Keohane and the University Center for Human Values Laurance S. Rockefeller Distinguished Visiting Professor of Public Charles Beitz Affairs and the University Center for Human Values Director, University Center for Human Values; Edwards S. Sanford Professor of Politics People 49

Sandra Bermann Philip Pettit Cotsen Professor of the Humanities; Professor of Comparative Laurance S. Rockefeller University Professor of Politics and the Literature University Center for Human Values

John Cooper Kim Lane Scheppele Henry Putnam University Professor of Philosophy Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Sociology and International Affairs and the University Center for Human Values Marc Fleurbaey Robert E. Kuenne Professor in Economics and Humanistic Peter Singer Studies; Professor of Public Affairs and the University Center for Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics in the University Center for Human Values Human Values

Eric Gregory Michael Smith Professor of Religion McCosh Professor of Philosophy

Elizabeth Harman Associate Professor of Philosophy and the University Center for Laurance S. Rockefeller University Human Values; Laurance S. Rockefeller University Preceptor Preceptors

Melissa Lane Elizabeth Harman Director, Program in Values and Public Life; Professor of Politics Associate Professor of Philosophy and the University Center for Human Values (2009-2012) Stephen Macedo Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Politics and the University Sarah McGrath Center for Human Values Assistant Professor of Philosophy (2011-14) Jan-Werner Mueller Professor of Politics

Alan Patten Professor of Politics; Acting Director, University Center for Human Values (2012-13) 50 People

People

Faculty Associates Sophie Gee Associate Professor of English Elizabeth Armstrong Associate Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs, Woodrow Robert George Wilson School McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence; Professor of Politics

Leora Batnitzky Eddie Glaude Jr. Professor of Religion William S. Tod Professor of Religion and African American Studies

João Biehl Gilbert Harman Susan Dod Brown Professor of Anthropology James S. McDonnell Distinguished University Professor of Philosophy John Darley Dorman T. Warren Professor of Psychology, Emeritus; Professor of Hendrik Hartog Psychology and Public Affairs, Emeritus (through June 30, 2012) Class of 1921 Bicentennial Professor in the History of American Law and Liberty; Professor of History Angus Deaton Dwight D. Eisenhower Professor of International Affairs; Professor Mark Johnston of Economics and International Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School Walter Cerf *41 Professor of Philosophy

Paul DiMaggio Thomas Kelly A. Barton Hepburn Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs Associate Professor of Philosophy

Mitchell Duneier Robert Keohane Maurice P. During Professor of Sociology Professor of Public and International Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School Caryl Emerson A. Watson Armour III University Professor of Slavic Languages David Leheny and Literatures; Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures and Henry Wendt III ’55 Professor of East Asian Studies Comparative Literature Thomas Leonard Susan Fiske Research Scholar in the Council of the Humanities Eugene Higgins Professor of Psychology Douglas Massey Daniel Garber Henry G. Bryant Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs, Stuart Professor of Philosophy Woodrow Wilson School People 51

Sarah McGrath Rahul Sagar Assistant Professor of Philosophy; Laurance S. Rockefeller Assistant Professor of Politics University Preceptor Harold T. Shapiro Alexander Nehamas President of the University Emeritus; Professor of Economics and Edmund N. Carpenter II Class of 1943 Professor in the Public Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School Humanities; Professor of Philosophy and Comparative Literature Anne-Marie Slaughter Guy Nordenson Bert G. Kerstetter ’66 University Professor of Politics and Professor of Architecture International Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School

Jeff Nunokawa Anna Stilz Professor of English Assistant Professor of Politics; Arthur H. Scribner Bicentennial Preceptor Joyce Carol Oates Roger S. Berlind ’52 Professor of the Humanities; Professor of Jeffrey Stout Creative Writing in the Lewis Center for the Arts Professor of Religion

Serguei Oushakine Maurizio Viroli Associate Professor of Slavic Languages and Literatures; John Professor of Politics Maclean Jr. Presidential University Preceptor Cornel West Devah Pager Class of 1943 University Professor in the Center for African Associate Professor of Sociology American Studies, Emeritus (though June 30, 2012)

Deborah Prentice Michael Wood Alexander Stewart 1886 Professor of Psychology Charles Barnwell Straut Class of 1923 Professor of English and Comparative Literature Albert Raboteau Henry W. Putnam Professor of Religion Robert Wuthnow Gerhard R. Andlinger ’52 Professor of Social Sciences; Daniel Rodgers Professor of Sociology Henry Charles Lea Professor of History

Gideon Rosen Stuart Professor of Philosophy 52 People

People

Advisory Council Staff

Danielle Allen ’93 Charles Beitz UPS Foundation Professor in the School of Social Science, Institute Director, University Center for Human Values; Edwards S. Sanford for Advanced Study Professor of Politics (On leave 2012-13)

Ezekiel Emanuel Melissa Lane Diane v.S. Levy and Robert M. Levy University Professor, Vice Director, Program in Values and Public Life; Professor of Politics Provost for Global Initiatives and Chair, Department of Medical (On leave 2012-13) Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Alan Patten Bert Kerstetter ’66 Acting Director, University Center for Human Values (2012-13); President, Everfast, Inc. Professor of Politics

Katherine Marshall ’69 Alan Ryan Senior Fellow and Visiting Professor, Berkley Center, Georgetown Acting Director, Program in Values and Public Life (2012-13); University; Senior Adviser, The World Bank Lecturer with the Rank of Professor in Politics

Mark Rockefeller ’89 Erum Syed Founder and CEO, Rockefeller Consulting; Vice Chairman, Assistant Director Rockefeller Financial Erin Graham Debra Satz Program Coordinator (from July 2012) Marta Sutton Weeks Professor of Ethics in Society, Senior Associate Dean for the Humanities and Arts, and Faculty Director, Erin Rizk Bowen H. McCoy Family Center for Ethics in Society, Stanford Program Coordinator (through May 2012) University Susan Winters Richard L. Smith ’70 Administrative Assistant Principal, Bay Resource Corporation Kimberly Girman Dennis F. Thompson Staff Assistant Alfred North Whitehead Professor of Political Philosophy, Andrew Perhac Department of Government and John F. Kennedy School of Computer Support Specialist Government, Harvard University Edited by Ushma Patel, Office of Communications Erin Rizk, University Center for Human Values Designed by Neil Mills, Office of Communications Photographs by Denise Applewhite and John Jameson, Office of Communications Additional photographs by Sameer Khan Erin Rizk Brian Wilson Frank Wojciechowski Posters by Matilda Luk, Neil Mills and Megan Peterson, Office of Communications

Copyright © 2012 by The Trustees of Princeton University

In the Nation’s Service and in the Service of All Nations

Princeton University is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. The center particularly invites applications from women and members of underrepresented minorities. For information about applying to Princeton and how to self-identify, please visit: http://web.princeton.edu/sites/dof/applicantsinfo.htm.

Nondiscrimination Statement In compliance with Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and other federal, state, and local laws, Princeton University does not discriminate on the basis of age, race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, national or ethnic origin, disability, or veteran status in any phase of its employment process, in any phase of its admission or financial aid programs, or other aspects of its educational programs or activities. The vice provost for institutional equity and diversity is the individual designated by the University to coordinate its efforts to comply with Title IX, Section 504 and other equal opportunity and affirmative action regulations and laws. Questions or concerns regarding Title IX, Section 504 or other aspects of Princeton’s equal opportunity or affirmative action programs should be directed to the Office of the Vice Provost for Institutional Equity and Diversity, Princeton University, 205 Nassau Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 or 609-258-6110.

350017-13 printed on recycled paper