Companies That Offer Matching Gift Programs
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
South Carolina, Are Writing to Express Our Strong Support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement
May 23, 2016 The Honorable Jeff Duncan U.S. House of Representatives 106 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Dear Representative Duncan: We, the 111 of undersigned companies, associations and organizations active in South Carolina, are writing to express our strong support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement. The TPP is critical to the future growth of trade, jobs, prosperity and competitiveness of the United States, and for South Carolina in particular. The Asia-Pacific will continue to be the most vibrant region in the global economy for the foreseeable future. Yet, we are falling behind, as other countries that have negotiated preferential trade agreements in the region place our manufacturers, innovators, service providers, farmers and ranchers, and workers at a competitive disadvantage. Approval of the TPP will close the gap, and place U.S. companies, farmers and ranchers, and workers at the center of this dynamic regional economy. Our state exported $1.0 billion worth of agricultural products and $10.6 billion of manufactured goods to TPP countries in 2015, and $1.5 billion of services to TPP countries in 2014. Our state's goods exports to the world supported an estimated 153,816 jobs in 2014. By cutting tariffs and red tape and eliminating other market distortions on our goods, installing critical new rules for the digital economy and services trade, and establishing stronger protections for transparency, innovation and intellectual property – subject to strong enforcement – the TPP will help our manufacturers, innovators, service providers, and farmers and ranchers export more, produce more and thereby support more jobs in South Carolina. -
Fact Book 2020
2020 AEP FACT BOOK 55th EEI Financial Conference November 9-10, 2020 “Safe Harbor” Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although AEP and each of its Registrant Subsidiaries believe that their expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such statements may be influenced by factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are: changes in economic conditions, electric market demand and demographic patterns in AEP service territories, The impact of pandemics, including COVID-19, and any associated disruption of AEP’s business operations due to impacts on economic or market conditions, electricity usage, employees, customers, service providers, vendors and suppliers, inflationary or deflationary interest rate trends, volatility in the financial markets, particularly developments affecting the availability or cost of capital to finance new capital projects and refinance existing debt, the availability and cost of funds to finance working capital and capital needs, particularly during periods when the time lag between incurring costs and recovery is long and the costs are material, decreased demand for electricity, weather conditions, including storms and drought conditions, and the ability to recover significant -
J Ohn S. and J Ames L. K Night F Oundation
A NNUAL REPORT 1999 T HE FIRST FIFTY YEARS J OHN S. AND JAMES L. KNIGHT FOUNDATION he John S. and James L. Kn i ght Fo u n d a ti on was estab- TA B L E O F CO N T E N T S l i s h ed in 1950 as a priva te fo u n d a ti on indepen d en t Tof the Kn i g ht bro t h ers’ n e ws p a per en terpri s e s . It is C h a i r m a n’s Letter 2 ded i c a ted to f urt h ering their ideals of s ervi ce to com mu n i ty, to the highest standards of j o u r n a l i s t ic excell en ce and to the Pr e s i d e n t ’s Message 4 defense of a free pre s s . In both their publishing and ph i l a n t h ropic undert a k i n g s , History 5 the Kn i ght bro t h ers shared a broad vi s i on and uncom m on devo ti on to the com m on wel f a re . It is those ide a l s , as well as Philanthropy Takes Root 6 t h eir ph i l a n t h ropic intere s t s , to wh i ch the Fo u n d a ti on rem a i n s The First Fifty Years 8 f a i t h f u l . -
Media Coverage of Ceos: Who? What? Where? When? Why?
Media Coverage of CEOs: Who? What? Where? When? Why? James T. Hamilton Sanford Institute of Public Policy Duke University [email protected] Richard Zeckhauser Kennedy School of Government Harvard University [email protected] Draft prepared for March 5-6, 2004 Workshop on the Media and Economic Performance, Stanford Institute for International Studies, Center on Development, Democracy, and the Rule of Law. We thank Stephanie Houghton and Pavel Zhelyazkov for expert research assistance. Media Coverage of CEOs: Who? What? Where? When? Why? Abstract: Media coverage of CEOs varies predictably across time and outlets depending on the audience demands served by reporters, incentives pursued by CEOs, and changes in real economic indicators. Coverage of firms and CEOs in the New York Times is countercyclical, with declines in real GDP generating increases in the average number of articles per firm and CEO. CEO credit claiming follows a cyclical pattern, with the number of press releases mentioning CEOs and profits, earnings, or sales increasing as monthly business indicators increase. CEOs also generate more press releases with soft news stories as the economy and stock market grow. Major papers, because of their focus on entertainment, offer a higher percentage of CEO stories focused on soft news or negative news compared to CEO articles in business and finance outlets. Coverage of CEOs is highly concentrated, with 20% of chief executives generating 80% of coverage. Firms headed by celebrity CEOs do not earn higher average shareholder returns in the short or long run. For some CEOs media coverage equates to on-the-job consumption of fame. -
Efficient Electrification at Epri August 2018 Newsletter
EFFICIENT ELECTRIFICATION AT EPRI AUGUST 2018 NEWSLETTER Efficient electrification is about innovation. It’s about creative solutions that benefit a broad range of stakeholders–utility customers, utilities, private industry, and society. This issue of Efficient Electrification highlights a few of the many innovative solutions that industry leaders are proposing: • To help customers learn about the benefits of using electricity and make more informed energy choices, American Electric Power (AEP) recently launched its Energy Conversion Hub. • To facilitate coordinated planning among energy and water utilities, the Water Resource Foundation is pioneering an innovative approach using a competitive tournament. • EPRI is demonstrating an innovative, low-cost solution to end-use monitoring and control called the energy management circuit breaker. • In its Electrification Futures Study, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) examines how potential electrification could transform the U.S. energy system. Learn about the key findings of the most recent report. • Global experts from utilities, private industry, regulators, EPRI, and others will cover many “big ideas” planned for the Electrification 2018 Conference plenary sessions. You will hear much more about innovative solutions in the many keynote talks, technical sessions, and exhibits at the upcoming Electrification 2018 International Conference & Exposition, August 20–23, 2018, in Long Beach, California. Remember to check out the list of recent news, events, and EPRI resources at the -
Fund Holdings As of 6/30/2021 Massmutual Balanced Fund Invesco Prior to 5/1/2021, the Fund Name Was Massmutual Premier Balanced Fund
Fund Holdings As of 6/30/2021 MassMutual Balanced Fund Invesco Prior to 5/1/2021, the Fund name was MassMutual Premier Balanced Fund. Fund Shares or Par Position Market Security Name Ticker CUSIP Weighting % Amount Value Apple Inc AAPL 037833100 3.91 48,433 6,633,384 Microsoft Corp MSFT 594918104 3.45 21,552 5,838,437 USTREAS T-Bill Auction Ave 3 Mon 1.69 2,862,977 JPMorgan Chase & Co JPM 46625H100 1.56 16,948 2,636,092 Verizon Communications Inc VZ 92343V104 1.45 43,768 2,452,321 The Home Depot Inc HD 437076102 1.42 7,556 2,409,533 Intel Corp INTC 458140100 1.29 38,961 2,187,271 Procter & Gamble Co PG 742718109 1.04 13,105 1,768,258 Cisco Systems Inc CSCO 17275R102 1.03 32,830 1,739,990 UnitedHealth Group Inc UNH 91324P102 1.00 4,215 1,687,855 Comcast Corp Class A CMCSA 20030N101 0.94 28,021 1,597,757 AT&T Inc T 00206R102 0.91 53,587 1,542,234 Oracle Corp ORCL 68389X105 0.83 18,031 1,403,533 Deere & Co DE 244199105 0.76 3,635 1,282,101 Accenture PLC Class A ACN G1151C101 0.74 4,237 1,249,025 Johnson Controls International PLC JCI G51502105 0.74 18,185 1,248,037 Visa Inc Class A V 92826C839 0.71 5,152 1,204,641 Texas Instruments Inc TXN 882508104 0.70 6,128 1,178,414 Costco Wholesale Corp COST 22160K105 0.67 2,850 1,127,660 Bank of America Corp BAC 060505104 0.64 26,192 1,079,896 Broadcom Inc AVGO 11135F101 0.63 2,223 1,060,015 Abbott Laboratories ABT 002824100 0.57 8,348 967,784 Target Corp TGT 87612E106 0.56 3,949 954,631 Honeywell International Inc HON 438516106 0.56 4,324 948,469 Goldman Sachs Group Inc GS 38141G104 0.53 2,374 901,004 -
Leasing Brochure
ENDLESS POSSIBILITIES ENDLESS POSSIBILITIES ENDLESS POSSIBILITIES FRANKLIN PARK ENDLESS POSSIBILITIES FRANKLIN PARK MALL #COMETOGETHER FASHION FAMILY FUN FOOD FASHION FAMILY FUN FOOD Franklin Park Mall is a super-regional shopping center located in Toledo, Ohio offering the PROPERTY INFO area’s premier selection of shopping, dining and entertainment options. The 1.3 million sq. ft. center is positioned in a rapidly expanding retail corridor and features exceptional freeway access to Toledo’s interstates and the Ohio Turnpike. Franklin Park Mall is the BUILT 1971 only enclosed shopping center within a 50-mile radius and welcomes more than 6 million REDEVELOPED 2005 visitors per year from surrounding Northwest Ohio and Southeast Michigan communities. TOTAL TENANTS 150+ The community destination is anchored by Dillard’s, Macy’s, JCPenney, Dick’s Sporting TOTAL CENTER GLA 1,300,000 SF Goods, a Cinemark 16 & XD theater and is home to 150+ local, regional and national DAILY VISITORS 16,400+ retailers. Visitors can enjoy the region’s only Dave & Buster’s, BJ’s Brewhouse and Apple Store as well as many first-to-market retailers including Altar’d State, Dry Goods and Box ANNUAL VISITORS 6+ MILLION Lunch. A bright and airy Food Court serving fast casual favorites such as Chick-Fil-A, PARKING SPACES 6,100 Steak Escape, Auntie Anne’s and Sbarro compliment an impressive lineup of full-service restaurants including Black Rock Bar & Grill, Bravo!, bd’s Mongolian Grill and Don Juan Mexican Restaurant. ANNUAL SALES As the fourth largest city in the state of Ohio, Toledo has the amenities of a lively metropolis and the charm of a small town. -
Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN RE: ROSUVASTATIN CALCIUM MDL No. 08-1949-JJF PATENT LITIGATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AND SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 07-805-JJF-LPS MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Defendant. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AND SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 07-806-JJF-LPS SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. , Defendant. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AND SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 07-807-JJF-LPS SANDOZ INC., Defendant. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AND SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 07-808-JJF-LPS PAR PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Defendant. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AND SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 07-809-JJF-LPS APOTEX CORP., Defendants. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AND SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 07-810-JJF-LPS AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD. AND AUROBINDO PHARMA USA INC., Defendants. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AND SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 07-811-JJF-LPS COBALT PHARMACEUTICALS INC. AND COBALT LABORATORIES INC., Defendants. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AND SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 08-359-JJF-LPS AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD. AND AUROBINDO PHARMA USA INC., Defendants. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED, IPR PHARMACEUTICALS INC., AND SHIONOGI SEIYAKU KABUSHIKI KAISHA, Plaintiffs, v. -
Joint Spin-Off Report
This report is a non-binding convenience translation of the German-language original report, which is the legally relevant document under German law. Joint Spin-off Report of the Managing Boards of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, Berlin and Munich, and OSRAM Licht AG, Munich, on the Spin-off of a Majority Participation in OSRAM pursuant to Section 127 sentence 1 German Transformation Act (Umwandlungsgesetz) I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 11 II. Starting situation – The legal entities involved in the Spin-off and the Siemens Group prior to the Spin-off ....................................................................................... 14 1. Overview of the Siemens Group ................................................................................ 14 2. Siemens AG as the transferring entity...................................................................... 16 a) Registered office and fiscal year .................................................................... 16 b) Capital stock and shares ................................................................................ 16 c) Warrant bonds ................................................................................................ 16 d) Stock-based compensation programs and employee participation programs – authorization to purchase treasury shares .............................. 17 e) Shareholder structure and trading on the stock exchange ......................... 18 f) Managing -
CSX CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) Virginia 62-1051971 (State Or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation Or Organization) (I.R.S
Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2019 OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________ to __________ Commission File Number 1-8022 CSX CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Virginia 62-1051971 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 500 Water Street, 15th Floor, Jacksonville, FL 32202 (904) 359-3200 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (Telephone number, including area code) No Change (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (X) No ( ) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes (X) No ( ) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. -
In the Matter of Owens Corning
0610281 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS: Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman Pamela Jones Harbour Jon Leibowitz William E. Kovacic J. Thomas Rosch ____________________________________ ) ) ) In the Matter of ) ) OWENS CORNING, ) Docket No. C- ) a corporation. ) ) ) ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act and of the Clayton Act, and by virtue of the authority vested by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission (the “Commission”), having reason to believe that respondent Owens Corning (“Owens Corning”), a corporation, and Compagnie de Saint Gobain (“Saint Gobain”), a corporation, both subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission, have agreed to an acquisition by Owens Corning of certain fiberglass reinforcements and composite fabrics assets of Saint Gobain in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding in respect thereof would be in the public interest, hereby issues its Complaint, stating its charges as follows: I. RESPONDENT 1. Respondent Owens Corning is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at One Owens Corning Parkway, Toledo, Ohio, 43659. Owens Corning is a global company engaged in a wide variety of businesses, including the development, manufacture, marketing, and sale of glass fiber reinforcements. 1 II. JURISDICTION 2. Owens Corning is, and at all times relevant herein has been, engaged in commerce as “commerce” is defined in Section 1 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. -
Vendor Contract Catalog
Vendor Contract Catalog Value First is a group purchasing organization (GPO) that leverages the buying power of long-term care communities across the country to provide significant savings on food, medical, environmental, office supplies and capital equipment. In collaboration with Provista, a ■ ■ supply chain partner with more than 200,000 customers, contracts are negotiated with suppliers based on over $100 Billion of shared purchasing volume. More volume means bigger discounts. FOOD Foodservice | Distribution Services Vendor Logistics | Planning | Products Contract Catalog MEDICAL Distribution | Technology ENVIRONMENTAL Facilities | Sanitation | Supplies OFFICE Consumables | Organization | Technology A Member-Driven Solution to Group Purchasing CAPITAL EQUIPMENT Manufacturing | Solutions | Technology Rev I - 5/4/2020 Note: This catalog is subject to frequent revisions. Please contact your Value First representative for the most up-to-date version. Table of Contents Vendor Contract Catalog Capital Equipment Medical Supplies Appliances ............................................... 2 Anti-Embolism Stockings ...................... 15 Capital Equipment Beds, Mattresses & Overlays .................. 2 Apparel & Uniforms ............................... 15 Carts & Shelving ...................................... 2 Blood Pressure Monitoring ................... 15 Vendor / Contract Name Contract # Copy Equipment ...................................... 2 Catheters ............................................... 16 Flooring and Ceiling ................................