DOCSLIB.ORG

Inequalities in Health

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inequalities in Health Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health Report Chairman: Sir Donald Acheson £19.50 published by The Stationery Office as ISBN 0 11 322173 8 Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health Report Contents Contents The Inquiry was chaired by: Terms of Reference Preface List of Tables and Figures Synopsis Part 1 Introduction Inequalities in Health: The Current Position Part 2 Reducing Inequalities in Health Areas for Future Policy Development 1. Poverty, Income, Tax and Benefits 2. Education 3. Employment 4. Housing and Environment 5. Mobility, Transport and Pollution 6. Nutrition and the Common Agricultural Policy 7. Mothers, Children and Families 8. Young People and Adults of Working Age 9. Older People 10. Ethnicity 11. Gender The National Health Service List of Recommendations References Annexes A. Letter from the Minister for Public Health (10 July 1997) B. Process of the Inquiry C. Acknowledgements D. Papers, Submissions and Evidence to the Inquiry Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health Report Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health The Inquiry was chaired by: Sir Donald Acheson, Chairman of the International Centre for Health and Society at University College, London. Scientific Advisory Group The Inquiry was overseen by a Scientific Advisory Group. The members of the Group were: Professor David Barker FRS, Director of the Medical Research Council's Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton Dr Jacky Chambers, Director of Public Health, Birmingham Health Authority Professor Hilary Graham, Director of the Economic and Social Research Council's Health Variations Programme, Lancaster University Professor Michael Marmot, Director of the International Centre for Health and Society, University College, London Dr Margaret Visiting Fellow, the King's Fund, London Secretariat Administrative Secretary: Dr Ray Earwicker, seconded from the Department of Health Scientific Secretary: Dr Catherine Law, seconded from the Medical Research Council's Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton Statistical Adviser: Frances Drever, seconded from the Office for National Statistics Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health Report Terms of Reference Terms of Reference 1. To moderate a Department of Health review of the latest available information on inequalities of health, using data from the Office for National Statistics, the Department of Health and elsewhere. The data review would summarise the evidence of inequalities of health and expectation of life in England and identify trends. 2. In the light of that evidence, to conduct - within the broad framework of the Government's overall financial strategy - an independent review to identify priority areas for future policy development, which scientific and expert evidence indicates are likely to offer opportunities for Government to develop beneficial, cost effective and affordable interventions to reduce health inequalities. 3. The review will report to the Secretary of State for Health. The report will be published and its conclusions, based on evidence, will contribute to the development of a new strategy for health. Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health Report Preface Preface This Report addresses an issue which is fundamentally a matter of social justice; namely that although the last 20 years have brought a marked increase in prosperity and substantial reductions in mortality to the people of this country as a whole, the gap in health between those at the top and bottom of the social scale has widened. Yet there is convincing evidence that, provided an appropriate agenda of policies can be defined and given priority, many of these inequalities are remediable. The same is true for those that exist between the various ethnic groups and between the sexes. In July 1997, I was invited by the Secretary of State for Health to review and summarise inequalities in health in England and to identify priority areas for the development of policies to reduce them. To accomplish this task, I have been aided by a small group of scientists. This Report is the result of our work together. In this work, we have consulted widely and drawn on the expertise of a range of colleagues whose names are acknowledged in the Report. We also acknowledge and have built on the work of those who have gone before us. We mention in particular Sir Douglas Black's ground breaking report "Inequalities in Health". We have also found inspiration in the work of the World Health Organisation which, in its European "Health for All" Policy, gives precedence above all other objectives to the promotion of equity in health within and between countries. There have been many relevant developments between the appointment of the Inquiry and our submission of this Report to Ministers. From its earliest days in office, the Government has expressed its concern about inequalities in health and in February 1998 translated this concern into a central premiss of its consultation paper "Our Healthier Nation". This has been followed not only by the 1998 Budget but by a succession of consultation documents and White Papers relevant to our inquiry. As our work developed, it has become clear that the range of factors influencing inequalities in health extends far beyond the remit of the Department of Health and that a response by the Government as a whole will be needed to deal with them. We believe that the policies and areas for policy development which we have identified from the available evidence, comprise an effective agenda. Its components are congruent and mutually reinforcing. We are convinced that if this agenda is implemented it will make a major beneficial impact on inequalities in health. We hope that it will also provide a sound basis for policy development well into the next millennium. At this point, the scientific work of the Inquiry is done. We commend the Report to the elected Government as a significant contribution to social equity worthy of urgent consideration. It is now for the Government to decide the rate of implementation and the affordability of our recommendations. Sir Donald Acheson September 1998 Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health Report List of Tables and Figures List of Tables and Figures TABLES Table Occupations within social class groupings 1: Table European standardised mortality rates, by social class, selected causes, men aged 20-64, England and Wales, 2: selected years Table Age-standardised mortality rates per 100,000 people, by social class, selected causes, men and women aged 35-64, 3: England and Wales, 1976-92 Table Estimates of the numbers of lives and working man-years lost per year, selected causes, men aged 20-64, England 4: and Wales, 1991-93 Table Unemployment rates, by ethnic group, Great Britain, Winter 1997/98 5: Table Proportion of dwellings by household tenure, England, 1938 and 1997 6: Table Household tenure, one person households, England, 1984 and 1995/6 7: Table Risk of being a victim of crime, by type of area, England and Wales, 1995 8: Table Mode of travel to work, England, 1991 9: Table Standardised mortality ratios, by country of birth, selected causes, men and women aged 20-69, England and 10: Wales, 1989-92 FIGURES Figure 1: The main determinants of health Figure 2: Socioeconomic circumstances and health outcomes Figure 3: Annual major accident rates, by age and social class, England 1996 Figure 4: Prevalence of mental health problems, by social class, men and women aged 16-64, Great Britain, 1993-94 Figure 5: Real household disposable income, before housing costs, United Kingdom, 1961-1994 Figure 6: Proportion of people whose income is below various fractions of average income, United Kingdom, 1961-1995 Figure 7: Proportion of the working age population without qualifications, by gender and ethnic group, Great Britain, Spring 1997 Figure 8: Unemployment rates, population age 16 years and over, England and Wales, 1961-95 Figure 9: Households with access to a car or a van, Great Britain, 1971-1996 Figure Standardised mortality rates, by gender, all ages, England and Wales, 1971-96 10: Figure Age-specific mortality rates, children, England and Wales, 1991-95 11: Figure Prevalence of major accidents, by gender and age, England, 1996 12: Figure Indices of average earnings, basic pensions and Income Support for those aged 75 and over, United Kingdom, 13: 1980-96 13: 1980-96 Figure Educational attainment and free school meals, England, 1996/97 14: Figure Projected road traffic growth, Great Britain, with low and high forecasts 15: Figure Standardised mortality rates, by Townsend quintile, males and females, England, 1993-95 16: Figure GP health promotion claims, by Jarman (UPA) score of health authority, London Boroughs, October 1995 17: Figure Rates of coronary artery bypass grafts and coronary angioplasty, by Jarman score, England, 1995/1996 18: Figure Distance from resource allocation target, all health authorities, England 1998/99 19: Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health Report Synopsis Synopsis Our task has been to review the evidence on inequalities in health in England, including time trends, and, as a contribution to the development of the Government's strategy for health, to identify areas for policy development likely to reduce these inequalities. We carried out our task over the last 12 months, drawing on scientific and expert evidence, and peer review. Although average mortality has fallen over the past 50 years, unacceptable inequalities in health persist. For many measures of health, inequalities have either remained the same or have widened in recent decades. These inequalities affect the whole of society and they can be identified at all stages of the life course from pregnancy to old age. The weight of scientific evidence supports a socioeconomic explanation of health inequalities. This traces the roots of ill health to such determinants as income, education and employment as well as to the material environment and lifestyle. It follows that our recommendations have implications across a broad front and reach far beyond the remit of the Department of Health.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Michael Marmot Secretary in Your Lifetime? I Have a Dog in This Fight
    BMJ CONFIDENTIAL Bevan or Lansley? Who was the best and the worst health Michael Marmot secretary in your lifetime? I have a dog in this fight. The best was Alan Johnson: Evidence based optimist we share a passion for reducing health inequalities. He commissioned me to do the Marmot Review, which we published as Fair Society, Healthy Lives . It has proved to be a great way to work with local authorities, Public Health England, and many others on social determinants of health. Stephen Dorrell used his experience as health secretary to be an independent minded and analytical chair of the Health Select Committee. The worst? A crowded field. Who is the person you would most like to thank and why? I believe, and evidence supports it, that good work requires a good home life and vice versa. I most want to MICHAEL MARMOT , 70, is the doyen of thank my wife and three children. health inequalities, both in research and To whom would you most like to apologise? policy. He led a groundbreaking study of When I toddled off to Buckingham Palace to receive Whitehall civil servants that showed, contra- an award, I kept thinking that it should have been Jerry ry to traditional thinking, that the lower their Morris [Scottish epidemiologist] and Geoffrey Rose. Jerry status, the worse their health—the “social rang me and said, “ We have come in from the cold.” gradient.” His conviction that evidence should If you were given £1m what would you spend it on? form the basis of policy and that people can I was given a lot of money once and established the make a diff erence led to his chairing two WHO commissions and the English review on Balzan Fellowships—bringing young scholars to UCL from social determinants of health.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Inequalities on the Island of Ireland - an Agenda for Change!
    Report of the conference on "Creating connections": health inqualities on the island of Ireland - an agenda for change! Item Type Report Authors Public Health Alliance Ireland (PHAI) Rights PHAI Download date 02/10/2021 01:15:44 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10147/45051 Find this and similar works at - http://www.lenus.ie/hse Report of the conference on “Creating Connections” Health inequalities on the island of Ireland - an agenda for change! Maynooth, November 2004 CREATING CONNECTIONS Perspectives on Health Inequalities on the island of Ireland Organising and Editorial Committee: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thomas Quigley Chair The Public Health Alliance Ireland (PHAI) and the (safefood, the Food Safety Promotion Board) Northern Ireland Public Health Alliance (NIPHA) in association with the Institute of Public Health in Ireland Monica-Anne Brennan (IPHI) would like to thank the organising committee for (Public Health Alliance Ireland) their work in organising the conference from which these perspectives are derived and for their assistance Majella McCloskey in editing this report. Special thanks to the chairs of (Association of Chief Officers of Voluntary the conference sessions: Owen Metcalfe, Brigid Quirke, Organisations NI) Majella McCloskey, Martin Higgins, Thomas Quigley and Diarmuid O’Donovan. Gary McFarlane (Chartered Institute of Environmental Health NI) The Alliances acknowledge the financial support received for the Creating Connections Conference and Aisling O’Connor this publication from the following: (Institute of Public Health
    [Show full text]
  • Closing the Gap in a Generation Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health Closing the Gap in a Generation Contents
    Commission on Social Determinants of Health FINAL REPORT Closing the gap in a generation Health equity through action on the social determinants of health CLOSING THE GAP IN A GENERATION CONTENTS WHO Library Cataloguing-in- © World Health Organization 2008 whatsoever on the part of the World Health All reasonable precautions have been taken Publication Data Organization concerning the legal status of by the World Health Organization to verify All rights reserved. Publications of the World any country, territory, city or area or of its the information contained in this publication. Closing the gap in a generation : health equity Health Organization can be obtained from authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its However, the published material is being through action on the social determinants WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps distributed without warranty of any kind, either of health : final report of the commission on Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland represent approximate border lines for which expressed or implied. The responsibility for social determinants of health. (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 there may not yet be full agreement. the interpretation and use of the material lies 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests with the reader. In no event shall the World 1.Socioeconomic factors. 2.Health care for permission to reproduce or translate The mention of specific companies or of Health Organization be liable for damages rationing. 3.Health services accessibility. WHO publications – whether for sale or for certain manufacturers’ products does not arising from its use. 4.Patient advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health the Vision and the Challenge
    THE ROCK CARLING FELLOWSHIP 1997 Public Health The vision and the challenge THE ROCK CARLING FELLOWSHIP 1997 PUBLIC HEALTH The vision and the challenge The pursuit of public health can have no finality... The problems of public health are changing rapidly with increasing medical knowledge and changes in social and economic conditions, the age distribution of the population and the outlook of the people. Sixth Annual Report of the Department of Health for Scotland 1934 Walter W Holland CBE, FRCP, FFPHM LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science London AND Susie Stewart DL, MA, HON MFPHM Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow Glasgow Published by The Nuffield Trust 59 New Cavendish Street, London WIM 7RD ISBN 1-902089-10-3 © Nuffield Trust 1998 Publications Committee Sir Derek Mitchell, KCB, cvo Professor John Ledingham, DM, FRCP John Wyn Owen, CB Designed by Benjamin Rowntree Reports Limited PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY BIDDLES & CO The Rock Carling Fellowship commemorates the late Sir Ernest Rock Carling for many years a governing Trustee and Chairman of the Medical Advisory Committee of the Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust. It was stipulated that each holder of the Fellowship will seek to review in a monograph the state of knowledge and activity in one of the fields in which Sir Ernest had been particularly interested, and which is within the purposes of the Trust. The arrangements provide that the monograph will be introduced by a public lecture given at a recognised Medical Teaching Centre in the United
    [Show full text]
  • 1/11/2006 Health in an Unequal World Michael Marmot This Is a Lightly
    1/11/2006 Health in an Unequal World Michael Marmot This is a lightly edited version of the (October) 2006 Harveian Oration at the Royal College of Physicians. It will be published in Clinical Medicine and the Lancet. In poor countries, tragically, people die unnecessarily. In rich countries, too, the higher death rate of those in less fortunate social positions is unnecessary. Can there be a link between these two phenomena: inequalities in health among countries and inequalities within? Surely, it might be argued, the depredations of grinding poverty – lack of food, shelter, clean water, and basic medical care or public health – that ravage the lives of the poor in developing countries are different in kind from the way that social disadvantage leads to poor health in modern Britain, for example. The diseases of the slums of Nairobi are, to be sure, different in kind from the diseases that affect the disadvantaged in east London or Harlem, and have different proximate causes. There is, however, a link. The unnecessary disease and suffering of the disadvantaged, whether in poor countries or rich, is a result of the way we organise our affairs in society. I shall argue, in this oration, that failing to meet the fundamental human need of autonomy, empowerment, or human freedom is a potent cause of ill-health. In making this case, I shall bring together two rather disparate streams of work. The first is a report of my own research endeavour. I have sought explanations for the social gradient in health, as observed in the Whitehall studies, pointing to the fundamental importance of the circumstances in which people live and work.
    [Show full text]
  • To Govern the Health Or to Make the Bills of Mortality - This Is the Question for Public Health in Poland
    PRZEGL EPIDEMIOL 2013; 67: 651 - 660 Public health Dorota Cianciara TO GOVERN THE HEALTH OR TO MAKE THE BILLS OF MORTALITY - THIS IS THE QUESTION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN POLAND School of Public Health, The Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw National Institute of Public Health – National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw ABSTRACT In the article important moments in the development of public health at the global scale were presented, as- suming that postwar evolution proceeded in two fundamental phases: the first – events which occurred to the proclamation of the Ottawa Charter and introduction of ‘new public health’ and the second – situations reported after Ottawa to the present time. The current challenges for public health in Poland were also discussed. It was proposed to differentiate two dimensions of public health capacity: internal (ad intra), which is with regard to the power centre, condition within the environment and external (ad extra), which refers to the relation with surroundings and population and enables to deliver sustain services and programmes. The possible strategies aiming at increasing ad intra capacity were also indicated. Key words: public health, health promotion, history, forecasting, capacity building In Poland, the theoretic, demonstrative and dis- INTRODUCTION cursive papers are hardly present. Furthermore, some papers which are available are of questionable quality. Health is of too high priority to be left for physi- The forums concerning ideas exchange, confronting the cians and public’s health is too crucial to be in charge of opinions, correcting the mistakes are also lacking. Not public health officers only. In Poland, the public health enough studies are conducted and the ones which are lesson has not been studied so scrupulously as it was carried out are the exemplification of biomedical and done in more developed countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Sir Michael Marmot
    Professor Sir Michael Marmot The degree of Doctor of Medicine (honoris causa) was conferred upon Professor Sir Michael Marmot at the Faculty of Medicine's 150th birthday celebrations held on 13 June 2006. Chancellor the Hon Justice Kim Santow conferring the honorary degree upon Professor Marmot, photo, courtesy Faculty of Medicine. Citation Chancellor, I have the honour to present Professor Sir Michael Marmot for admission to the degree of Doctor of Medicine, honoris causa. Sir Michael Marmot is a social epidemiologist of rare repute - indeed a founding father of that discipline. He has pioneered the academic study of how society influences health, particularly cardiovascular health, and of health inequalities both within and between countries. He chairs The World Health Organization Commission on Social Determinants of Health, which will report this year. The social and biological factors which Sir Michael has already identified as causes of disease and mortality have been as unexpected as they are preventable. The famous ‘Whitehall studies’ which he led showed that the higher people progressed in the hierarchy of the British civil service, the better their cardiac health and life expectancy - much better. The studies turned conventional wisdom about ‘executive stress’ upside down. He argues that limited personal autonomy and poor social participation are killers, acting via endocrine and metabolic pathways. This has major implications for political and corporate management policies, not to mention ‘participation policies’ for an aging population. Our leaders would do well to read his book called ‘Status Syndrome’. He is a distinguished graduate of this University. But the Medical Faculty’s 1968 Senior Year Book records, curiously, that Michael Marmot was born in 1945 and ‘became educated in 1966’.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    book reviews The nation’s doctor: the role of the Chief Medical Officer for working men. Morant, appointed to launch the new scheme, 1855–1998 needed to enlist the support of the medical profession. The general Sally Sheard and Sir Liam Donaldson. Radcliffe Publishing practitioners (GPs), however, had been stirred into opposition by in association with The Nuffield Trust, Oxford, 2005. the BMA. Morant joined forces with Dr Christopher Addison, a 264pp. £40.00 Liberal MP and Dean of St Bartholomew’s Hospital Medical School, and together they successfully enrolled doctors for the scheme. Sally Sheard, Senior Lecturer in the history of medicine at Liverpool From 1911, Addison, Morant and Newman worked towards the University, and Sir Liam Donaldson, Chief Medical Officer, creation of a Ministry of Health. Morant, a member of the Department of Health (DH), have collaborated to review the evolu- Machinery of Government Committee, produced the design and tion and development of the role of the Chief Medical Officer Addison, Minister of Reconstruction in the Wartime Coalition (CMO). Their book is not organised chronologically or biographi- Government, brought in the bill for the new ministry in November cally (although at the end there are vignettes of all holders of the 1918. The ministry was established in July 1919 with Addison as office) but rather by themes. Their account closes in 1998, a year minister, Morant as permanent secretary and Newman as the first after the return of the Labour government, with the retirement of CMO. The LGB, which had consistently opposed the creation of the Donaldson’s immediate predecessor, Sir Kenneth Calman.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Determinants of Health Inequalities
    Social Determinants of Health Inequalities Michael Marmot Professor of Epidemiology and Public Health, International Centre for Health and Society, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place London WC1E 6BT UK e-mail: [email protected] Michael Marmot is chairman of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health Acknowledgements: Grateful thanks to Ruth Bell, Hilary Brown, Tim Evans, Alec Irwin, Rene Loewenson, Nicole Valentine, Jeanette Vega, and members of the WHO Equity team who have worked to develop the Commission and the concepts in this paper. Abstract: The gross inequalities in health that we see within and between countries present a challenge to the world. That there should be a spread of life expectancy of 48 years among countries and 20 years or more within countries is not inevitable. A burgeoning volume of research identifies social factors at the root of much of these inequalities in health. Social determinants are relevant to communicable and non- communicable disease alike. Health status, therefore, should be of concern to policy makers in every sector, not solely those involved in health policy. As a response to this global change, WHO is launching a Commission on Social Determinants of Health, which will review the evidence, raise societal debate, and recommend policies with the goal of improving health of the word’s most vulnerable people. A major thrust of the Commission is turning public-health knowledge into political action. 1 There are gross inequalities in health between countries. Life expectancy at birth, to take one measure, ranges from 34 in Sierra Leone to 81.9 in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Social Determinants and the Health Divide in the WHO European Region: Final Report
    reprintUpdated 2014 Review of social determinants social of Review The World Health Organization World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency Regional Office for Europe of the United Nations created in UN City 1948 with the primary responsibility Marmorvej 51 for international health matters and DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø public health. The WHO Regional Denmark Office for Europe is one of six regional offices throughout the Tel.: +45 45 33 70 00 world, each with its own programme Fax: +45 45 33 70 01 geared to the particular health E-mail: [email protected] conditions of the countries it serves. Web site: www.euro.who.int Review of social determinants Member States Albania Andorra and the health divide in Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus and the health divide in the WHO European Region: WHO the European in divide health the and the WHO European Region: Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus final report Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Monaco Montenegro Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Republic of Moldova Romania Russian Federation San Marino Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden final report final Switzerland Tajikistan The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Turkey Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom Uzbekistan panos pictures | cover photo: bjoern steinz WHO-UCL SDH 2014 final full cover PRESS 260514.indd 1 26/05/2014 09:48 WHO-UCL SDH 2014 final full cover PRESS 260514.indd 2 26/05/2014 09:48 Review of social determinants and the health divide in the WHO European Region: final report Review chair Michael Marmot Report prepared by UCL Institute of Health Equity Abstract The WHO European Region has seen Keywords remarkable health gains in populations that Health inequities have experienced progressive improvements Health management and planning in the conditions in which people are born, Health status disparities grow, live and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Michael Marmot
    International Balzan Foundation Sir Michael Marmot 2004 Balzan Prize for Epidemiology Excerpt from Premi Balzan 2004. Laudationes, discorsi, saggi, Milan, 2005 (revised and enlarged edition, 2012) This publication has been re-issued on the occasion of the Annual Balzan Lecture 2012 at the University of Zurich, 29 August 2012, an initiative derived from the Agreements on Collaboration between the International Balzan Foundation “Prize”, the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, and the Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. © 2012, Fondazione Internazionale Balzan, Milano [www.balzan.org] Printed in Italy CONTENTS Michael Marmot, 2004 Balzan Prize for Epidemiology Prize Citation and Laudatio 5 Prizewinner’s Acceptance Speech at the Awards Ceremony 18 November 2004 at the Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rome 7 Social Determinants of Health: A Panoramic View A panoramic synthesis of his career, drawn up by Michael Marmot, on the occasion of the 2004 Awards Ceremony 9 Research Project – Abstract 19 Biographical and bibliographical data 23 International Balzan Foundation 25 Michael Marmot 2004 Balzan Prize for Epidemiology Prize Citation and Laudatio Sir Michael Marmot has made seminal contributions to epidemiology by establishing hitherto unsuspected links between social status and differences in health and life expectancy. He has initiated the era of social epidemiology and paved the way for the development of a wholly new concept of preventive medicine. Sir Michael Marmot has revolutionized epidemiology by establishing hith- erto unsuspected links between differences in health and life expectancy on the one hand, and social status on the other. In comparative studies of Japanese migrants in Hawaii and in California and of migrants from the Indian subcontinent to Great Britain, Sir Michael Marmot discovered the importance of a change in sociocultural environment relative to that of the associated change in habits – dietary, alcohol, smoking – in bringing about biological changes associated with an increase in cardiovascular morbid- ity and mortality.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Equity in England : the Marmot Review 10 Years On
    HEALTH EQUITY IN ENGLAND: THE MARMOT REVIEW 10 YEARS ON HEALTH EQUITY IN ENGLAND: THE MARMOT REVIEW 10 YEARS ON HEALTH EQUITY IN ENGLAND: THE MARMOT REVIEW 10 YEARS ON 1 Note from the Chair AUTHORS Report writing team: Michael Marmot, Jessica Allen, Tammy Boyce, Peter Goldblatt, Joana Morrison. The Marmot Review team was led by Michael Marmot and Jessica Allen and consisted of Jessica Allen, Matilda Allen, Peter Goldblatt, Tammy Boyce, Antiopi Ntouva, Joana Morrison, Felicity Porritt. Peter Goldblatt, Tammy Boyce and Joana Morrison coordinated production and analysis of tables and charts. Team support: Luke Beswick, Darryl Bourke, Kit Codling, Patricia Hallam, Alice Munro. The work of the Review was informed and guided by the Advisory Group and the Health Foundation. Suggested citation: Michael Marmot, Jessica Allen, Tammy Boyce, Peter Goldblatt, Joana Morrison (2020) Health equity in England: The Marmot Review 10 years on. London: Institute of Health Equity HEALTH FOUNDATION The Health Foundation supported this work and provided insight and advice. IHE would like to thank in particular: Jennifer Dixon, Jo Bibby, Jenny Cockin, Tim Elwell Sutton, Grace Everest, David Finch Adam Tinson, Rita Ranmal. AUTHORS’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are indebted to the Advisory Group that informed the review: Torsten Bell, David Buck, Sally Burlington, Jabeer Butt, Jo Casebourne, Adam Coutts, Naomi Eisenstadt, Joanne Roney, Frank Soodeen, Alice Wiseman. We are also grateful for advice and insight from the Collaboration for Health and Wellbeing. We are grateful for advice and input from Nicky Hawkins, Frameworks Institute; Angela Donkin, NFER; and Tom McBride, Early Intervention Foundation for comments on drafts.
    [Show full text]