Displacement Tracking Matrix V2.0 Update 12 January 2013 Summary
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX V2.0 UPDATE 12 JANUARY 2013 SUMMARY About DTM The Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) is a Highlights: monitoring tool designed to track internally displaced persons (IDP) population movement Three years after the devastating earthquake that struck Haiti in and provide updated information on the basic January 2010, an estimated 347,284 individuals (or about 87,750 conditions in camps and camp-like households) remain in 450 IDP sites. settlements in support of the Emergency Shelter and Camp Coordination and Camp Management (E-Shelter/CCCM) Cluster and Compared to 2010, this represents a decrease of about 77% in other humanitarian and recovery actors in overall IDP population (individuals and households). Meanwhile a Haiti. The DTM is implemented by the decrease of 71% is observed in total number of IDP sites remaining International Organization for Migration (IOM), open. in partnership with the Government of Haiti (GoH) through the Department of Civil When comparing the latest figures to the previous period (October Protection (DPC in French). 2012) a decrease of 3% is observed in overall (IDP individuals and Assessments are carried out on a bi-monthly households) population. This rate of decrease is consistent with basis across all identified IDP locations in the the previous periods. Port-au-Prince metropolitan area1 and the 2 southern regions affected by the 12 January Though overall figures have decreased, some slight population 2010 earthquake. The DTM has been utilized increases are observed in the communes of Croix‐des‐Bouquets, to monitor the population living in IDP sites since March 2010, and was revised (DTM Cite Soleil and Petit Goâve. v2.03) in October 2010 to meet the changing information needs as the displacement Return programs continue to contribute to the closure of IDP sites situation evolved. this period. The largest decrease in (IDP household) population and IDP sites observed in Tabarre as a direct consequence of DTM also incorporates feedback from return programs. partners carrying out return programs. In sites where partners have on going return activities, IOM asks partners to report on which sites According to the latest IDP registration report, about 84% of IDP they are working and, where possible, to households found in IDP sites in 2012 were also found there in provide updates on the population remaining 2010. in these sites. This information is used to update the DTM database accordingly. In Average household size in IDP sites has decreased in 2012: 3.4 cases where the site cannot be visited for security concerns, IOM uses aerial imagery as individuals per household compared to 4.3 in 2010. This is also the basis for population estimates. IOM smaller than the average household size reported in the national continues to use various methods of data census (2003) of 4.5. gathering to ensure the most updated information is available. 1 The seven communes in the metropolitan area are: Carrefour, Cite Soleil, Croix-Des-Bouquets, Delmas, Petionville, Port-au-Prince and Tabarre 2 Southern regions include Leogane, Gressier, Petit-Goave, Grand-Goave and Jacmel. 3 DTM v2.0 offers a more concise set of information on IDP site identification and population movement of the IDP population in Haiti. 1 DTM v2.0 Update – January 2013 RESULTS DTM v2.0 is on its thirteenth round of implementation. This report presents the results from field assessments that were conducted between November and December 20124. The release of the December 2012 figures was postponed to January 2013 in line with the third year commemoration of the devastating earthquake that struck Haiti in January 2010. Graph 1: Total number of displaced individuals from July 2010 to December 2012 (figures rounded) 1,500,000 1,370,000 1,069,000 * 810,000 680,000 635,000 595,000 551,000 519,000 516,000 491,000 420,000 390,000 369,000 358,000 347,000 JUL '10 SEP '10 NOV '10 JAN '11 MAR '11 MAY '11 JUL '11 SEP '11 NOV '11 JAN '12 FEB '12 APR '12 JUN '12 AUG '12 OCT '12 DEC '12 *In January 2011 the surrounding areas of Corail, known as Canaan, Jerusalem and Onaville, were included in DTM assessments upon the request of the humanitarian community. Table A: Estimated Number of IDP Sites, Households and Individuals Identified Through DTM – Total by Month July 2010 to December 2012 Month Sites Households Individuals JUL '10 1,555 361,517 1,536,447 SEP '10 1,356 321,208 1,374,273 NOV '10 1,199 245,586 1,068,882 JAN '11 1,152 195,776 806,377 MAR '11 1,061 171,307 680,494 MAY '11 1,001 158,437 634,807 JUL '11 894 149,317 594,811 SEP '11 802 135,961 550,560 NOV '11 758 127,658 519,164 JAN '12 707 126,218 515,961 FEB '12 660 120,791 490,545 APR '12 602 105,064 419,740 JUN '12 575 97,913 390,276 AUG '12 541 93,748 369,353 OCT '12 496 90,415 357,785 DEC '12 450 87,750 347,284 4 The overall figures reported continue to include the population in the surrounding locations of Corail Sector 4 IDP camp, referred to as Canaan and Jerusalem, as well as Onaville, near Corail Sector 3; these areas were included in the assessments as of January 2011. 2 DTM v2.0 Update – January 2013 Graphs: Number of IDP Sites (Graph 2), Households (Graph 3), and Individuals (Graph 4), identified through DTM – Total by Month July 2010 to December 2012 Graph 2 Graph 3 Graph 4 Sites Households Individuals 361,517 1,555 1,536,447 1,356 321,208 1,374,273 1,199 1,152 1,001 245,586 1,061 1,068,882 894 195,776 158,437 135,961 802 758 806,377 707 171,307 149,317 126,218 105,064 680,494 594,811 660 87,750 519,164 490,545 369,353 602 575 541 127,658 120,791 93,748 634,807 496 450 550,560 515,961 390,276 347,284 97,913 90,415 419,740 357,785 JUL SEP NOV JAN MA RMA Y JUL SEP NOV JAN FEB APR JUN AUG OCT DEC JUL SEP NOV JAN MA R MA Y JUL SEP NOV JAN FEB APR JUN AUG OCT DEC JUL SEP NOV JAN MA R MA Y JUL SEP NOV JAN FEB APR JUN AUG OCT DEC '10 '10 '10 '11 '11 '11 '11 '11 '11 '12 '12 '12 '12 '12 '12 '12 '10 '10 '10 '11 '11 '11 '11 '11 '11 '12 '12 '12 '12 '12 '12 '12 '10 '10 '10 '11 '11 '11 '11 '11 '11 '12 '12 '12 '12 '12 '12 '12 METHODOLOGY IOM rolled out DTM V2.0 in October 2010. The DTM v2.0 gathers more concise information than the previous DTM v1.0, narrowing the focus and providing basic information on IDP sites and IDP populations for the benefit of humanitarian actors carrying out interventions in the earthquake affected areas across the country. This rapid camp-based assessment is implemented by a team of about 200 staff, of which 100 are field staff that carryout the data gathering activities. During a bi-monthly DTM cycle, assessments of all identified IDP sites are conducted within a six week period which includes all activities, such as: data collection, verification, data-processing and analysis. The DTM field teams use the DTM v2.0 - IDP Site/Camp Information form for each assessment. The teams use various methods, including key respondent interviews with camp managers and camp committees, and observation and physical counting in order to collect all data to complete the form. The field teams approach each individual IDP site in a targeted manner, meaning that the method of data collection can vary depending on the situation of that specific IDP site. After the data is gathered, consultation is carried out with actors that have a regular presence on the ground, namely, IOM Camp Management Operations (CMO) teams, representatives from the DPC, and other actors carrying out interventions in IDP sites. The IOM Data Management Unit’s call centre is also engaged to verify data directly with IDP Camp Committees or other relevant respondents. Google Earth, aerial imagery and other available technology are also used to assist in validating a variety of data, such as location and area. It is important to highlight that though estimates of the IDP individual population are provided through DTM, assessments are carried out at the household level with representatives reporting the number of individuals included in their household. For more information regarding the methodology utilized for the DTM, including the tools, please refer to the Displacement Tracking Matrix Strategy – Version 2.0, May 2011 document available at: http://iomhaitidataportal.info 3 DTM v2.0 Update – January 2013 Table B: Comparison of number of IDP sites, households and individuals by commune in July 2010, October 2012 and December 2012 Sites Sites Sites Households Households Households Individuals Individuals Individuals Commune July '10 Oct '12 Dec '12 July '10 Oct '12 Dec '12 July '10 Oct '12 Dec '12 CARREFOUR 172 69 65 48,273 5,775 5,282 205,162 20,355 18,760 CITE SOLEIL 63 22 22 16,535 3,012 3,046 70,273 12,090 12,123 CROIX-DES-BOUQUETS 115 35 35 24,722 16,137 16,240 105,064 74,995 74,929 DELMAS 279 105 101 82,086 35,386 35,085 348,859 138,435 137,547 GANTHIER 7 1 1 1,438 16 16 6,111 37 37 PORT-AU-PRINCE 193 103 91 70,856 16,724 15,813 301,156 60,875 56,169 TABARRE 85 50 27 17,177 5,577 4,584 73,001 20,075 17,108 PETION-VILLE 112 41 40 24,604 5,370 5,342 104,560 22,650 22,578 GRAND-GOAVE 60 7 7 8,157 167 164 34,665 509 500 GRESSIER 62 12 12 10,014 266 241 42,560 1,002 863 JACMEL 54 1 1 6,145 60 60 26,115 200 200 LEOGANE 253 27 25 39,260 1,724 1,657 166,859 5,931 5,752 PETIT-GOAVE 100 23 23 12,250 201 220 52,062 631 718 Total 1,555 496 450 361,517 90,415 87,750 1,536,447 357,785 347,284 Difference Oct '12 - Dec '12 Sites -46 Households -2,665 Individuals -10,501 % found in Dec '12 Found in Dec '1291% Found in Dec '12 97% Found in Dec '12 97% % of decrease in Dec '12 9% 3% 3% IDP Population Three years after the earthquake, an estimated 87,750 IDP households or 347,284 IDP individuals remain in 450 IDP sites in Haiti.