Joint Committee on Public Petitions, Houses of the Oireachtas, Republic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joint Committee on Public Petitions, Houses of the Oireachtas, Republic ^<1 AM p,I , .S' Ae RECEIVED r , ,1FEB2i2{ a Co GII C' CS, I ^'b' Via t\ SGIrbhis Thith an 01 ea htais @ Houses of the Oireachtas Service TITHE AN O^REACHTAZS . AN COMHCH01STE UM ACHAINtOCHA ON bPOBAL HOUSES OF THE OrREACHTAS JOINT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC PET^TiONS SUBM^SS^ON OF THE SECRETARIAT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC PETITIONS - IRELAND ^NqUIRY INTO THE FUNCTIONS, PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES . OF THE STANDING COMMITrEE ON ENv^RONMENT AND PUBLrc AFFAIRS LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL WESTERN AUSTRAL^A Houses of the Oireachtas Leinster House Kildare St Dublin 2 Do2 xR2o Ireland ,.,. February 2020 II'~ API ~~ ~, I -,/' -.<,, ,:; -.. t . Contents I . I n trod u ct io n ...,............................................................................................................ 4 2. Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Public Petitions 2 0 I I - 2 0 I 6 ..........................................................,.,,.....,.,,.,,,....................................... 5 3. Composition, Purpose, Powers of the Joint Committee on Public Service Oversig ht a rid Pu blic Petitions 201 I- 2016. .................................... 6 3.2 The Joint sub-Committee on Pu blic Petitions 2011 '20/6 ................,..,,,. 7 3.3 The Joint Sub-Committee on the Ombudsman 2011-2016. ................... 9 4. Joint Committee on Public Petitions 2016 - 2020 ...................................,. 10 4.2. Functions of the Joint Committee on Public Petitions 201.6-2020 .... 10 4.3. Powers of the Joint Committee on Public Petitions 201.6-2020 ..... 10 Figu re I : Differences of remit between Joint Committees ........,................,. 12 5 . Ad mis si bi lity of P etitio n s ...................,.., . .................... ....,,,, ... ... ......,.,,,.,.,....... 14 5.2 . In ad missi bin ty of Petitio ns .,,,........,,,,,,,,.., ................... ..,,,........ ., .,. .................. Is 5.3. Consideration of Petitio ns by the Committee. ............,..........,,,................. 15 Fig u re 2 : Flowcha rt of the Petitio ns Process .... ..................,,,,......,,..,,.,,,,,,,, . .. 16 Figure 3 : Staffing of Joint Committee on Public Petitions. ............................ 17 Figure 4: Petitions received by the Joint Committee on Public Petitionsi7 6 . Ap p e n d i ces ..........,..................................................,,.....,,,......................................... 1.8 Appendix I - Joint Coin mittee on Pu blic Petitions ,,.........,................................... ^8 Appendix 2 : Membership of Joint Committee on Public Petitions. ................. 22 Appendix 3 - Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions. .24 Orders of Reference of the Committee ( Extract) ...,,,........................................... 24 Appendix 4: Membership of Committee of the Joint Oireachtas Committee o n Pu blic Se rvice Ove rsig ht a n d Petitio ns .......,,... ....................,,,,,....,,.,...,,.,,, .,... 32 Ap pe ridix 5 - Political Pa rty Ab b reviatio n s, ,,,,,.,,,.... .,,,,,.............................,,.,.,....... 35 Appe ridix 6 - Exam pies of Petition Titles Received ,,.,.,,,,..................................... 36 . I. Introduction The purpose of the petitions system in the Houses of the Oireachtas is to enhance engagement between parliament and citizens on matters of general public concern or interest. Members of the public can submit petitions to the Houses of the Oireachtas on matters of general public concern or interest in relation to their legislative powers or on an issue of public policy, Petitions can be submitted online or by completing the relevant forms which can be requested from the secretariat to the Committee and these can be returned once completed, by post or via email. The Joint Committee on Public Petitions is a Standing Committee, it is provided for under Dail and Seanad Standing Orders. ' . Dail Standing Order 93(2) provides that a proportion of Chairman posts shall be allocated to the party or parties in Government and each group in the Dail (as defined in Standing Order 1.43). Such proportion shall be calculated according to the d'Hondt system, and under such system, the party or parties in Government and each group shall choose a particular Chairman post as the posts are allocated, excluding posts already allocated by Standing Orders or by Order of the Dail: Provided that a Government party may not choose the Chairmanship of the Committee of Public Accounts. The House shall appoint all Chairmen, in accordance with the provisions of this Standing Order and of Standing Orders generally. 2 . ' Available at: htt data o1 eachtas re re o1reachtas arliamenta Business sta din Orders da 20172017 01-17 consolidated standin order of da eireann en df Last accessed 3 February 2020. zjbid 2. Joint Committee on Publ, c Service Overs, ght and Publ, c Petitions 201. ,.. 20, .6 The Programme for Government (2011)' included a commitment to establish an Investigations, Oversight and Petitions Committee of the Houses of the Oireachtas for the first time and it was subsequently established by the 31'' D^il in 201.1. The objective of the establishment of the petitions system was to enable greater citizen interaction with the parliamentary system. In order for Parliamentary Committees to have proper meaningful power to investigate, an amendment to the Constitution was required and a constitutional referendum on Investigative Powers for Committees was held on 27 October 2011. The referendum was defeated and accordingly the Orders of Reference for the Joint Committee were amended to exclude an investigatory role for the Committee. On 1.2 July 201.2, Dail and Seanad Eireann adopted additional Standing Orders: (1) Permitting petitions to be addressed to the Houses of the 01reachtas on matters of general public concern or interest in relation to their legislative powers or an issue of public policy and for the consideration of such petitions by the Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions. (2) Strengthening parliamentary oversight of public service delivery by providing for the establishment of the Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions as a standing Committee. 'Available at ttD 11 err on t eet. Ie/en/wo c re t u oads 2010 05 Pro rainme or Government 201.1 of 3. Composition, Purpose, Powers of the Joint Committee on Publ, c Service Over5.9ht and Publ, c Petitions 20L, . 201.6 In the 31st Dail and the 25'' Seanad, the Joint Committee on Public Oversight and Petitions consisted of 20 members - 15 members of Dail ^ireann and 5 members , of Seanad Eireann - and was responsible for oversight of public service delivery generally, with a particular focus on investigating and identifying improvements in the delivery of such services to citizens' The Joint Committee also acted through two sub-committees: (1) The Joint sub-Committee on Public Petitions; (2) The Joint sub-Committee on the Ombudsman. The Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions considered the quality and standards of public service delivery, including the effectiveness of public service complaints and redress systems; informed by its sub-Committees' consideration of Ombudsmans reports and petitions received. However, Public Service Oversight and Petitions also had authority to consider such related matters as it thought fit. 4 The Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions was also required to consider such matters as may be referred to it by the Houses of the Oireachtas from time to time. The Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions and each of its Sub- committees could: . (1) Take oral and written evidence and print and publish from time to time minutes of such evidence taken in public before it together with such related documents as it saw fit; (2) Invite and accept written submissions from interested persons or bodies; (3) Draft recommendations for legislative change and for new legislation; (4) Require a Member of the Government or Minister of State to attend before it to discuss: (a) policy; ' Dan 5.0.165A(61(c)(ill) Available at: htt data o eachtas e e o eachtas a 11ame to Bus nes standin Orde s dai12017201701 17 consolidated standin o ders of dail eireann en df Last accessed 3 February 2020. (b) proposed primary or secondary legislation (prior to such legislation being published) for which he or she is officially responsible; (5) Require principal office holders of bodies in the State which are partly or wholly funded by the State or which are established or appointed by members of the Government or by the 01reachtas shall attend meetings of Committee, as appropriate, to discuss issues for which they are officially responsible. In addition, the Joint Sub-committee on the Ombudsman had, by default, power to send for persons, papers and records. This was a necessary precondition for the granting of authority to compel the attendance of persons . and the production of documents. Sectoral Committees' in the 31'' Dail were riot permitted to consider matters which were being or were about to be considered by the Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions or its Sub-committees. The Sectoral Committees were required to consider and report back on matters referred to them by Public Service Oversight and Petitions or either of the two sub- Committees. The Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions and its sub" Committees were riot permitted to consider matters which are being or are to be considered by the Committee of Public Accounts. 6 3.2 The Joint
Recommended publications
  • IRISH LIFE SCIENCES Directory ©Enterprise Ireland December ‘10 - (251R)
    The IRISH LIFE SCIENCES Directory ©Enterprise Ireland December ‘10 - (251R) The see map underneathπ IrIsh The LIfe scIences www.enterprise-ireland.com Irish Life Sciences Directory Ireland is a globally recognised centre of excellence in the Life Sciences industry. Directory This directory highlights the opportunities open to international companies to partner and do business with world-class Irish enterprises. Funded by the Irish Government under the National Development Plan, 2007-2013 see map overleaf ∏ Irish Life Sciences Companies Donegal Roscommon Itronik Interconnect Ltd. ANSAmed Moll Industries Ireland Ltd. Wiss Medi Teo. Westmeath Arran Chemical Co Ltd. Leitrim Cavan Univet Ltd. Mayo M&V Medical Devices Ltd. Vistamed Ltd. Louth LLR-G5 Ltd Mergon Healthcare AmRay Medical Ovagen Group Ltd. Technical Engineering Bellurgan Precision Engineering Ltd. Precision Wire Components & Tooling Services Ltd. ID Technology Ltd. Trend Technologies Mullingar Ltd. Millmount Healthcare Ltd. New Era Packaging Ltd. Sligo Ovelle Ltd. Arrotek Medical Ltd. Letterkenny Derry Uniblock Ltd. Avenue Mould Solutions Ltd. Donegal iNBLEX Plastics Ltd Donegal Northern Galway ProTek Medical Ltd. Aerogen Ltd. SL Controls Ltd. Ireland Belfast Longford Anecto Ltd. Socrates Finesse Medical Ltd. APOS TopChem Laboratories Ltd. Avonmed Healthcare Ltd. TopChem Pharmaceutcals Ltd. Bio Medical Research Enniskillen Monaghan Meath BSM Ireland Ltd. Leitrim Newry ArcRoyal Ltd. Cambus Medical Sligo Monaghan Ballina Sligo Kells Stainless Ltd. Cappella Medical Devices Ltd. Cavan Carrick-on-Shannon Novachem Corporation Ltd. Caragh Precision Dundalk Cavan Offaly Chanelle Medical Castlebar Louth Chanelle Pharamaceuticals Europharma Concepts Ltd. Mayo Roscommon Manufacturing Ltd. Westport Longford Drogheda Midland Bandages Ltd. Clada Medical Devices Roscommon Steripack Medical Packaging Longford Meath Complete Laboratory Solutions Contech Ireland Dublin Athlone Creagh Medical Limited Mullingar AGI Therapeutics Plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibition of Conversion Therapies Bill 2018
    An Bille um Thoirmeasc ar Theiripí Tiontúcháin, 2018 Prohibition of Conversion Therapies Bill 2018 Mar a tionscnaíodh As initiated [No. 33.6 of 2018] AN BILLE UM THOIRMEASC AR THEIRIPÍ TIONTÚCHÁIN, 2018 PROHIBITION OF CONVERSION THERAPIES BILL 2018 Mar a tionscnaíodh As initiated CONTENTS Section 1. Interpretation 2. Prohibition of Conversion Therapy 3. Criminalisation of Conversion Therapies 4. Short title and Commencement [No.33.6 of 2018] ACT REFERRED TO Mercantile Marine Act 1955 (No. 29) 2 AN BILLE UM THOIRMEASC AR THEIRIPÍ TIONTÚCHÁIN, 2018 PROHIBITION OF CONVERSION THERAPIES BILL 2018 Bill entitled An Act to prohibit conversion therapy, as a deceptive and harmful act or practice against 5 a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity and, or gender expression. Be it enacted by the Oireachtas as follows: Interpretation 1. In this Act— “conversion therapy”— 10 (a) means any practice or treatment by any person that seeks to change, suppress and, or eliminate a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity and, or gender expression; and (b) does not include any practice or treatment, which does not seek to change a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity and, or gender expression, or 15 which— (i) provides assistance to an individual undergoing a gender transition; or (ii) provides acceptance, support and understanding of a person, or a facilitation of a person’s coping, social support and identity exploration and development, including sexual orientation-neutral interventions; 20 “sexual orientation” refers to each person’s capacity
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad Éireann
    Vol. 277 Monday, No. 7 28 June 2021 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SEANAD ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insert Date Here 28/06/2021A00100Gnó an tSeanaid - Business of Seanad � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 475 28/06/2021A00300Nithe i dtosach suíonna - Commencement Matters� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 476 28/06/2021A00350Domestic Violence � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 476 28/06/2021B00500Fishing Industry � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 478 28/06/2021C00400Environmental Policy � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 481 28/06/2021D00650Horticulture Sector � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 483 28/06/2021E00400Schools Building Projects � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 485 28/06/2021F00450Thalidomide Victims Compensation � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 488 28/06/2021Q00700Worker Co-Operatives and Right To Buy Bill 2021: First Stage � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • Lettre Conjointe De 1.080 Parlementaires De 25 Pays Européens Aux Gouvernements Et Dirigeants Européens Contre L'annexion De La Cisjordanie Par Israël
    Lettre conjointe de 1.080 parlementaires de 25 pays européens aux gouvernements et dirigeants européens contre l'annexion de la Cisjordanie par Israël 23 juin 2020 Nous, parlementaires de toute l'Europe engagés en faveur d'un ordre mondial fonde ́ sur le droit international, partageons de vives inquietudeś concernant le plan du president́ Trump pour le conflit israeló -palestinien et la perspective d'une annexion israélienne du territoire de la Cisjordanie. Nous sommes profondement́ preoccuṕ eś par le preć edent́ que cela creerait́ pour les relations internationales en geń eral.́ Depuis des decennies,́ l'Europe promeut une solution juste au conflit israeló -palestinien sous la forme d'une solution a ̀ deux Etats,́ conformement́ au droit international et aux resolutionś pertinentes du Conseil de securit́ e ́ des Nations unies. Malheureusement, le plan du president́ Trump s'ecarté des parametres̀ et des principes convenus au niveau international. Il favorise un controlê israelień permanent sur un territoire palestinien fragmente,́ laissant les Palestiniens sans souverainete ́ et donnant feu vert a ̀ Israel̈ pour annexer unilateralement́ des parties importantes de la Cisjordanie. Suivant la voie du plan Trump, la coalition israelienné recemment́ composeé stipule que le gouvernement peut aller de l'avant avec l'annexion des̀ le 1er juillet 2020. Cette decisioń sera fatale aux perspectives de paix israeló -palestinienne et remettra en question les normes les plus fondamentales qui guident les relations internationales, y compris la Charte des Nations unies. Nous sommes profondement́ preoccuṕ eś par l'impact de l'annexion sur la vie des Israelienś et des Palestiniens ainsi que par son potentiel destabilisateuŕ dans la regioń aux portes de notre continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad Éireann
    Vol. 234 Tuesday, No. 3 23 September 2014 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SEANAD ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insert Date Here 23/09/2014A00100Business of Seanad 132 23/09/2014B00100Order of Business 132 23/09/2014W00100Education (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2014: Second Stage 151 23/09/2014GG00400Business of Seanad 164 23/09/2014GG00700Education (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2014: Committee Stage (Resumed) �������������������������������������������������164 23/09/2014MM01100Appointments to Board of Irish Museum of Modern Art: Statements 172 23/09/2014RR00100Adjournment Matters ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������183 23/09/2014RR00150VAT Rate Application 183 SEANAD ÉIREANN Dé Máirt, 23 Meán Fómhair 2014 Tuesday, 23 September 2014 Chuaigh an Cathaoirleach i gceannas ar 230 pm Machnamh agus Paidir. Reflection and Prayer. 23/09/2014A00100Business of Seanad 23/09/2014A00200An Cathaoirleach: I have received notice from Senator Martin Conway that, on the motion for the Adjournment of the House today, he proposes to raise the following matter: The need for the Minister for Finance
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad Éireann
    SEANAD ÉIREANN AN BILLE UM GHNÍOMHÚ AERÁIDE AGUS UM FHORBAIRT ÍSEALCHARBÓIN (LEASÚ), 2021 CLIMATE ACTION AND LOW CARBON DEVELOPMENT (AMENDMENT) BILL 2021 LEASUITHE COISTE COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS [No. 39a of 2021] [2 July, 2021] SEANAD ÉIREANN AN BILLE UM GHNÍOMHÚ AERÁIDE AGUS UM FHORBAIRT ÍSEALCHARBÓIN (LEASÚ), 2021 —AN COISTE CLIMATE ACTION AND LOW CARBON DEVELOPMENT (AMENDMENT) BILL 2021 —COMMITTEE STAGE Leasuithe Amendments *Government amendments are denoted by an asterisk SECTION 3 1. In page 6, line 29, after “emissions” to insert “minus removals”. —Senators Regina Doherty, Garret Ahearn, Paddy Burke, Jerry Buttimer, Maire Ní Bhroinn, Micheál Carrigy, Martin Conway, John Cummins, Emer Currie, Aisling Dolan, Seán Kyne, Tim Lombard, John McGahon, Joe O'Reilly, Mary Seery Kearney, Barry Ward, Lisa Chambers, Catherine Ardagh, Niall Blaney, Malcolm Byrne, Pat Casey, Shane Cassells, Lorraine Clifford-Lee, Ollie Crowe, Paul Daly, Aidan Davitt, Timmy Dooley, Mary Fitzpatrick, Robbie Gallagher, Gerry Horkan, Erin McGreehan, Eugene Murphy, Fiona O'Loughlin, Denis O'Donovan, Ned O'Sullivan, Diarmuid Wilson. 2. In page 6, to delete lines 34 and 35, and in page 7, to delete lines 1 to 3 and substitute the following: “ ‘climate justice’ means the requirement that decisions and actions taken, within the State and at the international level, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adapt to the effects of climate change shall, in so far as it is practicable to do so— (a) support the people who are most affected by climate change but who have done the least to cause it and are the least equipped to adapt to its effects, (b) safeguard the most vulnerable persons, (c) endeavour to share the burdens and benefits arising from climate change, and (d) help to address inequality;”.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1 TOGHCHÁIN ÁITIÚLA, 1999 LOCAL ELECTIONS, 1999
    TOGHCHÁIN ÁITIÚLA, 1999 LOCAL ELECTIONS, 1999 Volume 1 TOGHCHÁIN ÁITIÚLA, 1999 LOCAL ELECTIONS, 1999 Volume 1 DUBLIN PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE To be purchased through any bookseller, or directly from the GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS SALE OFFICE, SUN ALLIANCE HOUSE, MOLESWORTH STREET, DUBLIN 2 £12.00 €15.24 © Copyright Government of Ireland 2000 ISBN 0-7076-6434-9 P. 33331/E Gr. 30-01 7/00 3,000 Brunswick Press Ltd. ii CLÁR CONTENTS Page Foreword........................................................................................................................................................................ v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... vii LOCAL AUTHORITIES County Councils Carlow...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Cavan....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Clare ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Cork (Northern Division) .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Cork (Southern Division).........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PMB Briefing Paper
    Oireachtas Library & Research Service | Bill Digest PMB Briefing Paper Control of Economic Activity (Occupied Territories) Bill 2018 (PMB) John Spicer and Abdul Malik of Europe Economics, Quentin Liger, Mirja Gutheil and Harry Heyburn of Optimity Advisors 28th February 2019 Abstract This Briefing Paper examines provisions contained in the Control of Economic Activity (Occupied Territories) Bill 2018 (PMB), in advance of Pre-Committee Stage Scrutiny (PCSS) of the Bill by the Select Committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade. This Bill proposes to make it an offence for a person to import or sell goods or services originating in an occupied territory or to extract resources from an occupied territory in certain circumstances; and to provide for related matters. Oireachtas Library & Research Service | Briefing Paper ContentsAbbreviation/Glossary ....................................................................................................... 1 Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Key Issues/Areas for Discussion ..................................................................................................... 5 Introduction and the main provisions of the Bill ............................................................................... 7 Policy arguments in favour of and against
    [Show full text]
  • Relations with Other State Powers
    THE BULLETIN The Venice Commission was requested by the Constitutional Court of Romania, currently holding the presidency of the Conference of European Constitutional Courts (CECC), to produce a working document on the topic chosen by its Circle of Presidents at the preparatory meeting in Bucharest in October 2009 for the XV th Congress of the CECC. The topic was the following: “The relations of the Constitutional Court with other state authorities. Sub-topic 1: relations between the Constitutional Court and parliament. Sub-topic 2: conflicts of competence. Sub-topic 3: the execution of judgments.” The present working document is a contribution by the Venice Commission to the success of the Congress. Constitutional courts are the independent guarantors of the constitution and their main task is to protect the supremacy of the constitution over ordinary law. Over time, however, these courts have taken on further tasks, such as safeguarding the individual against the excess of the executive or providing a safeguard against judicial errors. Another very important role of these courts is to act as a neutral arbiter in cases of conflict between state bodies. Parties to such a conflict know that they can turn to the Constitutional Court for a decision that will help them in resolving their conflict based on the constitution. The possibility of turning to the court in itself sometimes incites them to settle their disputes before they even reach the court. In order to function correctly as an effective institution that stands above the parties in such a dispute, Constitutional Courts need to be independent and need to be seen as being independent.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP RS NARS and Indepen
    The National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia Serbia AND INDEPENDENT BODIES SERBIA THE REPUBLIC OF OF ASSEMBLY NATIONAL NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES 253 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES Materials from the Conference ”National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia and Independent Bodies” Belgrade, 26-27 November 2009 and an Overview of the Examples of International Practice Olivera PURIĆ UNDP Deputy Resident Representative a.i. Edited by Boris ČAMERNIK, Jelena MANIĆ and Biljana LEDENIČAN The following have participated: Velibor POPOVIĆ, Maja ŠTERNIĆ, Jelena MACURA MARINKOVIĆ Translated by: Novica PETROVIĆ Isidora VLASAK English text revised by: Charles ROBERTSON Design and layout Branislav STANKOVIĆ Copy editing Jasmina SELMANOVIĆ Printing Stylos, Novi Sad Number of copies 150 in English language and 350 in Serbian language For the publisher United Nations Development Programme, Country Office Serbia Internacionalnih brigada 69, 11000 Beograd, +381 11 2040400, www.undp.org.rs ISBN – 978-86-7728-125-0 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations and the United Nations Development Programme. Acknowledgement We would like to thank all those whose hard work has made this publication possible. We are particularly grateful for the guidance and support of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia, above all from the Cabinet of the Speaker and the Secretariat. A special debt of gratitude is owed to the representatives of the independent regulatory bodies; the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, the State Audit Institution, the Ombudsman of the Republic of Serbia and the Anti-corruption Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • How Has European Integration Impacted Regionalist Political Parties’ Electoral Support?
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2021 A Europe of Regionalists: How Has European Integration Impacted Regionalist Political Parties’ Electoral Support? Brandon N. Piel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Piel, Brandon N., "A Europe of Regionalists: How Has European Integration Impacted Regionalist Political Parties’ Electoral Support?" (2021). CMC Senior Theses. 2669. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2669 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College A Europe of Regionalists: How has European integration impacted regionalist political parties’ electoral support? Submitted to Professor Lisa Langdon Koch by Brandon N. Piel for Senior Thesis Fall 2020 – Spring 2021 April 26, 2021 Abstract This study investigates the question: How has European integration impacted regionalist political parties’ electoral support? European integration and regionalism are theoretically connected by Seth Jolly’s viability theory which explains that supranational organizations, such as the European Union (and precursor organizations), make small countries more viable. Using the regions of Flanders, Corsica, Sardinia, Padania, Galicia, and Catalonia as case studies, this thesis identifies
    [Show full text]