DOCSLIB.ORG

"References" for Carnivore Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Publications Plant Health Inspection Service 2001 "References" for Carnivore Conservation John L. Gittleman University of Virginia - Main Campus Stephan M. Funk Zoological Society of London David Macdonald University of Oxford Robert K. Wayne University of California - Los Angeles Eric M. Gese USDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Gittleman, John L.; Funk, Stephan M.; Macdonald, David; Wayne, Robert K.; and Gese, Eric M., ""References" for Carnivore Conservation" (2001). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 1017. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/1017 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in CARNIVORE CONSERVATION, edited by John L. Gittleman, Stephan M. Funk, David Macdonald, and Robert K. Wayne, Cambridge University Press, 2001. (Includes contribution by Eric M. Gese, USDA-NWRC, and is therefore not subject to copyright.) References Aaris-Sorensen, J. (199 6). Road-kills of badgers (Meles meles) in Denmark. Annales Zoologici Fennici 32: 31-36. Abrams, P. A (1996). Evolution and the consequences of species introductions and deletions. Ecology 77: 1321-1328. Abramsky, Z., Bowers, M. A & Rosenzweig, M. L. (1986). Detecting interspecific competition in the field: testing the regression method. Oikos 47: 199-204. Ackerman, B. B., Hemker, T. P., Lindzey, F. G. & Button, A J. (1981). Cougar numbers in the Henry Mountains, Utah. Encyclia 58: 57-62. Addin Enbbu, Baillie, J. & Groombridge, B. (1996). 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. Gland: IUCN. Addin Enbbu, Balmford, A, Mace, G. M. & Leader-Williams, N. (1996). Redesign­ ing the ark: setting priorities for captive breeding. ConselVation Biology 10: 719- 72 7. Addison, R. F. & Brodie, P. F. (1987a). Organochlorine residues in maternal blub­ ber, milk, and pup blubber from grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) from Sable Is­ land, Nova Scotia. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board Canada 34: 937-941. Addison, R. F. & Brodie, P. F. (1987b). Transfer of organochlorine residues from blubber through the circulatory system to milk in the lactating grey seal Hali­ choC/'us grypus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44: 782-786. Addison, R. F., Zinck, M. E. & Smith, T. G. (1986). PCBs have declined more than DDT-group residues in Arctic ringed seals (Phoca hispida) between 1972 and 1981. Environmental Science and Technology 20: 253-256. Adorjan, A S. & Kolenosky, G. B. (1969). A manual for the identification of hairs of selected Ontario mammals. Ontario Department of Lands and Forests Research RepOli No. 90. Aguirre, A. A (1998). Biomedical management of the most endangered pinniped in US waters: the Hawaiian monk seal (Monarchus schauinslandii). Proceedings of the AAZV and AAWV Joint Conference p. 374- Aitken, G. (1997). Conservation and individual worth. Environmental Values 6: 439- 454· Aitken, G. (1998). Extinction. Biology and Philosophy 13: 393-4II. Albrecht, G. (1998). Thinking like an ecosystem: the ethics of the relocation, reha­ bilitation and release of wildlife. Animal Issues 2: 21-46. Aldrich, P. & Hamrick, J. (1998). Reproductive dominance of pasture trees in a 540 I References fragmented tropical forest mosaic. Science 281: 103-105. Alexander, K. A & Appel, M. J. G. (1994). African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) endan­ gered by a canine distemper epidemic among domestic dogs near the Masai Mara National reserve Kenya. Journal oJ Wildlife Diseases 30: 481-485. Alexander, K. A, Kat, P. W., Frank, L. G., Holekamp, K. E., Smale, L., House, C. & Appel, M.J.G. (1995). Evidence of canine distemper virus infection among free­ ranging spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) in the Masai Mara, Kenya. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 26: 201-206. Alexander, K. A, Maclachlan, N. J., Kat, P. W., House, C., O'Brien, S. J., Lerche, N. W., Sawyer, M., Frank, L. G., Holekamp, K., Smale, L., McNutt, J. W., Lauren­ son, M. K., Mills, M. G. L. & Osburn, B. 1. (1994). Evidence of natural blue­ tongue virus infection among African carnivores. American Journal oJTropical Medicine and Hygiene 51: 568-576. Alexander, K. A, Smith, J. S., Macharia, M. J. & King, A A. (1993). Rabies in the Masai Mara, Kenya: a preliminary report. Onderstepoort Journal oJ Veterinary Re­ search 60: 4II-414. Allee, W. C. (1931). Animal Aggregations. A Study in General Sociology. Chicago: Uni­ versity of Chicago Press. Allen, L. & Engeman, R. (1995). Assessing the impact of dingo predation on wildlife using an activity index. Australian Vertebrate Pest Control Conference 10: 72-79. Allen, L., Engeman, R. M. & Krupa, H. W. (1996). Evaluation of three relative abun­ dance indices for assessing dingo populations. Wildlife Research 23: 197-206. Allen, P. J., Amos, W., Pomeroy, P. P. & Twiss, S. D. (1995). Microsatellitevariation in grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) shows evidence of genetic differentiation be­ tween two British breeding colonies. Molecular Ecology 4: 653-662. Allen, S. H. (1984). Some aspects of reproductive performance in female red fox in North Dakota. Journal oj Mammalogy 65: 236-255. Allen, S. H. & Sargeant, A B. (1975). A rural mail-carrier index of North Dakota red foxes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 3: 74-77. Allen, S. H. & Sargeant, A B. (1993). Dispersal patterns of red foxes relative to population density. Journal oJWildlife Management 57: 526-533. Aiterio, N., Brown, K. & Moller, H. (1997). Secondary poisoning of mustelids in a New Zealand nothofagus forest. Journal oJZoology 243= 863-869. Amarasekare, P. (1994). Ecology of introduced small mammals on western Mauna Kea, Hawaii. Journal oj Mammalogy 75: 24-38. Amos, W., Twiss, S. D., Pomeroy, P. P. & Anderson, S. S. (1993). Male mating success and paternity in the grey seal, Halichoerus grypus: a study using DNA fingerprinting. Proceedings oj the Royal Society oj London, Series B, Biological Sciences 252: 199-207. Andeit, W. F. & Andelt, S. H. (1984). Diet bias in scat deposition-rate surveys of coyote density. Wildlife Society Bulletin 12: 74-77. Andersen, L. W., Born, E. W., Gjertz, 1., Wiig, 0., Holm, L.-E. & Bendixen, C,(1998). Population structure and gene flow of the Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) in the eastern Atlantic Arctic based on mitochondrial DNA and micro­ satellite variation. Molecular Ecology 7: 1323-1336. Anderson, A E. (1983); A critical review of literature on puma (Felis concolor). Col­ orado Division oJ Wildlife, Special Report 54: 1-91. Anderson, D. R. (1997). Corridor Use, Feeding Ecology, and Habitat Relationships of References I 541 Black Bears in a Fragmented Landscape in Louisiana. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Anderson, J. L. (I98I). The re-establishment and management of a lion population in Zululand, South Africa. Biological Conservation 19: I07-II7. Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. (I978). Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions. I. Regulatory processes. Journal of Animal Ecology 47: 219-247· Anderson, S. S. & Hawkins, A D. (I978). Scaring seals by sound. Mammal Review 8: 19-24. Andren, H. (I994). Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in land­ scapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 7I: 355-366. Andren, H. (I995). Effects oflandscape composition on predation rates at habitat edges. In Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes, eds L. Hansson, L. Fahrig & G. Merriam, pp. 225-255. London: Chapman & Hall. Andren, H. (I999). Habitat fragmentation, the random sample hypothesis and criti­ cal thresholds. Oikos 84: 306-308. Andrews, R. D. (I979). Furbearer population surveys and techniques: their prob­ lems and uses in Iowa. In Proceedings of the Midwest Furbearer Conference. Kansas State University, Coop. Ext. Serv., Manhattan, pp. 45-55. Angelstam, P., Lindstrom, E. & Widen, P. (I984). Role of predation in short-term population fluctuations of some birds and mammals in Fennoscandia. Oecologia 62: 199-208. Angerbjorn, A., Tannerfeldt, M. & Erlinge, S. (I999). Predator-prey relationships: arctic foxes and lemmings. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 34-49. Angerbjorn, A, Arvidson, B., Noren, E. & Stromgren, L. (I99I). The effect of winter food on reproduction in the arctic fox, Alopex lagopus: a field experiment. Journal of Animal Ecology 60: 705-714. Anon. (I989). Wolf persecution continues in Norway. Oryx 23: I06. Anon. (I999a). South China tiger killed one person - five tigers believed to survive in Jiangxi Province. People's Daily (Beijing) July 22. Anon. (I999b). Colorado lynx re-introduction sparks bitter controversy. Cat News 30: 15· Anthony, R. M. (I996). Den use by arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) in a subarctic region of western Alaska. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74: 627-631. Anzalone, C. R., Bench, G. S., Balhorn, R. & Wildt, D. E. (I998). Chromatin alter­ ations in sperm of teratospermic domestic cats. Proceedings of the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Biology of Reproduction Supplement, abstract
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PERFORMED IDENTITIES: HEAVY METAL MUSICIANS BETWEEN 1984 and 1991 Bradley C. Klypchak a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate
    PERFORMED IDENTITIES: HEAVY METAL MUSICIANS BETWEEN 1984 AND 1991 Bradley C. Klypchak A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 Committee: Dr. Jeffrey A. Brown, Advisor Dr. John Makay Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Ron E. Shields Dr. Don McQuarie © 2007 Bradley C. Klypchak All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Jeffrey A. Brown, Advisor Between 1984 and 1991, heavy metal became one of the most publicly popular and commercially successful rock music subgenres. The focus of this dissertation is to explore the following research questions: How did the subculture of heavy metal music between 1984 and 1991 evolve and what meanings can be derived from this ongoing process? How did the contextual circumstances surrounding heavy metal music during this period impact the performative choices exhibited by artists, and from a position of retrospection, what lasting significance does this particular era of heavy metal merit today? A textual analysis of metal- related materials fostered the development of themes relating to the selective choices made and performances enacted by metal artists. These themes were then considered in terms of gender, sexuality, race, and age constructions as well as the ongoing negotiations of the metal artist within multiple performative realms. Occurring at the juncture of art and commerce, heavy metal music is a purposeful construction. Metal musicians made performative choices for serving particular aims, be it fame, wealth, or art. These same individuals worked within a greater system of influence. Metal bands were the contracted employees of record labels whose own corporate aims needed to be recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Impacts and Potential Mitigation for Icebreaking Vessels MARK Transiting Pupping Areas of an Ice-Breeding Seal
    Biological Conservation 214 (2017) 213–222 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Assessment of impacts and potential mitigation for icebreaking vessels MARK transiting pupping areas of an ice-breeding seal ⁎ Susan C. Wilsona, , Irina Trukhanovab, Lilia Dmitrievac, Evgeniya Dolgovad, Imogen Crawforda, Mirgaliy Baimukanove, Timur Baimukanove, Bekzat Ismagambetove, Meirambek Pazylbekovf, ⁎ Mart Jüssig, Simon J. Goodmanc, a Tara Seal Research, Killyleagh, Co. Down, N. Ireland, UK b Polar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, USA c School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK d Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russian Federation e Institute of Hydrobiology & Ecology, Karasaysky Raion, Almaty, Kazakhstan f Institute of Fisheries, Almaty, Kazakhstan g Pro Mare MTÜ, Saula, Kose, Harjumaa EE 75101, Estonia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Icebreaker operations in the Arctic and other areas are increasing rapidly to support new industrial activities and Caspian Sea shipping routes, but the impact on pinnipeds in these habitats is poorly explored. We present the first quantitative Pinniped study of icebreakers transiting ice-breeding habitat of a phocid seal and recommendations for mitigation. Impacts Marine mammal were recorded from the vessel bridge during seven ice seasons 2006–2013, for Caspian seals (Pusa caspica) Ship strikes breeding on the winter ice-field of the Caspian Sea. Impacts included displacement and separation of mothers and Aerial survey pups, breakage of birth or nursery sites and vessel-seal collisions. The flight distance of mothers with pups ahead Conservation was < 100 m, but measurable disturbance occurred at distances exceeding 200 m.
    [Show full text]
  • 56. Otariidae and Phocidae
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE JUDITH E. KING 1 Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Southern Elephant Seal–Mirounga leonina [G. Ross] Ross Seal, with pup–Ommatophoca rossii [J. Libke] Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Weddell Seal–Leptonychotes weddellii [P. Shaughnessy] New Zealand Fur-seal–Arctocephalus forsteri [G. Ross] Crab-eater Seal–Lobodon carcinophagus [P. Shaughnessy] 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE DEFINITION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION Pinnipeds are aquatic carnivores. They differ from other mammals in their streamlined shape, reduction of pinnae and adaptation of both fore and hind feet to form flippers. In the skull, the orbits are enlarged, the lacrimal bones are absent or indistinct and there are never more than three upper and two lower incisors. The cheek teeth are nearly homodont and some conditions of the ear that are very distinctive (Repenning 1972). Both superfamilies of pinnipeds, Phocoidea and Otarioidea, are represented in Australian waters by a number of species (Table 56.1). The various superfamilies and families may be distinguished by important and/or easily observed characters (Table 56.2). King (1983b) provided more detailed lists and references. These and other differences between the above two groups are not regarded as being of great significance, especially as an undoubted fur seal (Australian Fur-seal Arctocephalus pusillus) is as big as some of the sea lions and has some characters of the skull, teeth and behaviour which are rather more like sea lions (Repenning, Peterson & Hubbs 1971; Warneke & Shaughnessy 1985). The Phocoidea includes the single Family Phocidae – the ‘true seals’, distinguished from the Otariidae by the absence of a pinna and by the position of the hind flippers (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Italian Landrace Conservation Strategy
    The Italian landrace conservation strategy PGR Secure _ D.4.2. The Italian landrace conservation strategy Valeria Negri and Renzo Torricelli Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie Alimentari e Ambientali (Department of Agricultural, Nutritional and Environmental Sciences), University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy PGR Secure _ Deliverable 4.2. Pag. 2 PGR Secure _ D.4.2. Index 1. Premise .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Landrace Definition and Importance .............................................................................................................. 6 2.2. Landrace Conservation In Situ and Ex Situ ..................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3. On-farm conservation definition ............................................................................................................. 7 2.2.3 In situ (on-farm) conservation focus ........................................................................................................ 8 2.2.4. Ex situ conservation definition and focus ................................................................................................ 9 2.2.5. In situ vs ex situ conservation and complementarity ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List the Iliamna Lake Seal, a Distinct Population Segment of Eastern North Pacific Harbor Seal (Phoca Vitulina Richardii), Under the U.S
    Before the Secretary of Commerce Petition to List the Iliamna Lake Seal, a Distinct Population Segment of Eastern North Pacific Harbor Seal (Phoca vitulina richardii), under the U.S. Endangered Species Act Photo Credit: NOAA Fisheries/Dave Withrow Center for Biological Diversity 6 February 2020 i Notice of Petition Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Ave. NW Washington, D.C. 20230 Email: [email protected], [email protected] Dr. Neil Jacobs, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Ave. NW Washington, D.C. 20230 Email: [email protected] Petitioner: Kristin Carden, Oceans Program Scientist, on behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity 1212 Broadway #800 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: 510.844.7100 x327 Email: [email protected] On November 19, 2012, the Center for Biological Diversity (Center, Petitioner) submitted to the Secretary of Commerce and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) through the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) a petition to list the Iliamna Lake population of eastern North Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardii) as threatened or endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA). (See generally Center 2012.) On May 17, 2013, NMFS issued a positive 90- day finding “that the petition present[ed] substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petition action may be warranted” and initiated a status review. (78 Fed. Reg. 29,098 (May 17, 2013).). On November 17, 2016, NMFS issued a determination that listing was not warranted because “the seals in Iliamna Lake do not constitute a species, subspecies, or distinct population segment (DPS) under the ESA.” (81 Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Assessment for Kyrgyzstan
    Biodiversity Assessment for Kyrgyzstan Task Order under the Biodiversity & Sustainable Forestry IQC (BIOFOR) USAID CONTRACT NUMBER: LAG-I-00-99-00014-00 SUBMITTED TO: USAID CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS MISSION, ALMATY, KAZAKHSTAN SUBMITTED BY: CHEMONICS INTERNATIONAL INC. WASHINGTON, D.C. JUNE 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I INTRODUCTION I-1 SECTION II STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY II-1 A. Overview II-1 B. Major Ecoregions II-1 C. Species Diversity II-3 D. Agrobiodiversity II-5 E. Threats to Biodiversity II-6 F. Resource Trends II-7 SECTION III STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION III-1 A. Protected Areas III-1 B. Agriculture III-2 C. Forests III-2 D. Fisheries III-3 SECTION IV STRATEGIC AND POLICY FRAMEWORK IV-1 A. Institutional Framework IV-1 B. Legislative Framework IV-3 C. International Conventions and Agreements IV-5 D. Internationally Funded Programs IV-5 SECTION V SUMMARY OF FINDINGS V-1 SECTION VI RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVED BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION VI-1 SECTION VII USAID/KYRGYZSTAN VII-1 A. Impact of USAID Program on Biodiversity VII-1 B. Recommendations VII-1 ANNEX A SECTIONS 117 AND 119 OF THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT A-1 ANNEX B SCOPE OF WORK B-1 ANNEX C LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED C-1 ANNEX D LISTS OF RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF KYRGYZSTAN D-1 ANNEX E MAP OF ECOSYSTEMS AND PROTECTED AREAS OF KYRGYZSTAN E-1 ANNEX F PROTECTED AREAS IN KYRGYZSTAN F-1 ANNEX G SCHEDULE OF TEAM VISITS G-1 ANNEX H INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES (FROM NBSAP) H-1 ANNEX I CENTRAL ASIA TRANSBOUNDARY BIODIVERSITY PROJECT I-1 ACRONYMS BEO Bureau Environmental Officer BIOFOR Biodiversity and Sustainable Forestry BSAP Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan CAR Central Asian Republics CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CTO Contracting Technical Officer DC District of Columbia EE Europe and Eurasia FAA Foreign Assistance Act GEF Global Environment Fund GIS Geographic Information Systems GTZ German Agency for Technical Cooperation ha hectare I.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of Natural History
    p m r- r-' ME FYF-11 - - T r r.- 1. 4,6*. of the FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBCAT, BLACK BEAR, AND FLORIDA PANTHER IN SOUTH FLORIDA David Steffen Maehr Volume 40, No. 1, pf 1-176 1997 == 46 1ms 34 i " 4 '· 0?1~ I. Al' Ai: *'%, R' I.' I / Em/-.Ail-%- .1/9" . -_____- UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY am published at irregular intervals Volumes contain about 300 pages and are not necessarily completed in any one calendar year. JOHN F. EISENBERG, EDITOR RICHARD FRANZ CO-EDIWR RHODA J. BRYANT, A£ANAGING EMOR Communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publications and all manuscripts should be addressed to: Managing Editor. Bulletin; Florida Museum of Natural Histoty, University of Florida P. O. Box 117800, Gainesville FL 32611-7800; US.A This journal is printed on recycled paper. ISSN: 0071-6154 CODEN: BF 5BAS Publication date: October 1, 1997 Price: $ 10.00 Frontispiece: Female Florida panther #32 treed by hounds in a laurel oak at the site of her first capture on the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge in central Collier County, 3 February 1989. Photograph by David S. Maehr. THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBCAT, BLACK BEAR, AND FLORIDA PANTHER IN SOUTH FLORIDA David Steffen Maehri ABSTRACT Comparisons of food habits, habitat use, and movements revealed a low probability for competitive interactions among bobcat (Lynx ndia). Florida panther (Puma concotor cooi 1 and black bear (Urns amencanus) in South Florida. All three species preferred upland forests but ©onsumed different foods and utilized the landscape in ways that resulted in ecological separation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biolcons Damen 2011.Pdf
    Biological Conservation 144 (2011) 989–997 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Will climate change reduce the efficacy of protected areas for amphibian conservation in Italy? ⇑ Manuela D’Amen a, , Pierluigi Bombi b, Peter B. Pearman c, Dirk R. Schmatz c, Niklaus E. Zimmermann c, Marco A. Bologna a a Department of Environmental Biology, University of ‘‘Roma Tre’’, Viale G. Marconi 446, 00146 Rome, Italy b SPACE Environment, via Maria Giudice 23, 00135 Rome, Italy c Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zuercherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland article info abstract Article history: Amphibians are an important and imperiled component of biodiversity. In this study we analyze the effi- Received 14 April 2010 cacy of Italian reserve network for protecting multiple amphibian species in a climate change scenario, Received in revised form 21 August 2010 considering both nationally designated areas and Natura 2000 sites. Our approach is based on ensemble Accepted 1 November 2010 niche modeling estimate of potential range shift under two carbon emission scenarios (A1FI and B1) and Available online 22 January 2011 two dispersal assumptions. The predicted distributions were used to perform gap and irreplaceability analyses. Our findings show that the current Italian reserve network incompletely represents current Keywords: amphibian diversity and its geographic pattern. The combination of the nationally designated protected Global warming areas and the Natura 2000 sites improves current representation of amphibians, but conservation targets Gap analysis Irreplaceability based on geographic range extent are achieved for only 40% of species. Under the future scenarios, Natura Conservation priorities 2000 sites become a crucial component of the protected areas system.
    [Show full text]
  • Human-Black Bear Conflict a Review of the Most Common Management Practices
    HUMAN-BLACK BEAR CONFLICT A REVIEW OF THE MOST COMMON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES A black bear in Lake Tahoe, NV. Photo courtesy Urbanbearfootage.com 1 A black bear patrols downtown Carson City, NV. Photo courtesy Heiko De Groot 2 Authors Carl W. Lackey (Nevada Department of Wildlife) Stewart W. Breck (USDA-WS-National Wildlife Research Center) Brian Wakeling (Nevada Department of Wildlife; Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies) Bryant White (Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies) 3 Table of Contents Preface Acknowledgements Introduction . The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation and human-bear conflicts . “I Hold the Smoking Gun” by Chris Parmeter Status of the American Black Bear . Historic and Current distribution . Population estimates and human-bear conflict data Status of Human-Black Bear Conflict . Quantifying Conflict . Definition of Terms Associated with Human-Bear Management Methods to Address Human-Bear Conflicts . Public Education . Law and Ordinance Enforcement . Exclusionary Methods . Capture and Release . Aversive Conditioning . Repellents . Damage Compensation Programs . Supplemental & Diversionary Feeding . Depredation (Kill) Permits . Management Bears (Agency Kill) . Privatized Conflict Management Population Management . Regulated Hunting and Trapping . Control of Non-Hunting Mortality . Fertility Control . Habitat Management . No Intervention Agency Policy Literature Cited 4 Abstract Most human-black bear (Ursus americanus) conflict occurs when people make anthropogenic foods (that is, foods of human origin like trash, dog food, domestic poultry, or fruit trees) available to bears. Bears change their behavior to take advantage of these resources and in the process may damage property or cause public safety concerns. Managers are often forced to focus efforts on reactive non-lethal and lethal bear management techniques to solve immediate problems, which do little to address root causes of human-bear conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Year Variation in Pup Production of Caspian Seals Pusa Caspica 2005–2012 Determined from Aerial Surveys
    Vol. 28: 209–223, 2015 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online October 7 doi: 10.3354/esr00689 Endang Species Res OPEN ACCESS Inter-year variation in pup production of Caspian seals Pusa caspica 2005–2012 determined from aerial surveys Lilia Dmitrieva1,*, Tero Härkönen2, Mirgaliy Baimukanov3, Anders Bignert2, Ivar Jüssi4, Mart Jüssi4, Yesbol Kasimbekov3, Mikhail Verevkin5, Vadim Vysotskiy6, Susan Wilson7, Simon J. Goodman1,* 1School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK 2Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, Stockholm 10405, Sweden 3Institute of Hydrobiology & Ecology, Karasaysky Raion, Almaty 040916, Kazakhstan 4Estonian Fund for Nature, PO Box 245, Tartu 50002, Estonia 5St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab.7/9, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia 6Zoological Institute, RAS, Universitetskaja nab. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia 7Tara Seal Research, Killyleagh, Co. Down BT30 9QN, UK ABSTRACT: Assessing species abundance and reproductive output is crucial for evaluations of population dynamics, conservation status and the development of management objectives. The Caspian seal Pusa caspica is a key predator in the Caspian Sea ecosystem and is listed as Endan- gered by the IUCN. Here we report on fixed-wing aerial strip transect surveys of the breeding population on the Caspian Sea winter ice field carried out in February, 2005−2012. Potential detection biases were estimated by applying a Petersen mark–recapture estimator to the counts from double photographic observations. We also tested for effects of weather conditions on count results, and for correlations between pup production and ice conditions and net primary produc- tivity (npp). Fluctuations in pup production estimates were observed among years, ranging from 8200 pups (95% CI: 7130−9342) in 2010 to 34 000 (95% CI: 31 275−36 814) in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Ecology of Black Bears in the Okefenokee-Osceola Ecosystem
    Final Report to Study Cooperators Population Ecology of Black Bears in the Okefenokee-Osceola Ecosystem Prepared by: Steven Dobey1, Darrin V. Masters2, Brian K. Scheick2, Joseph D. Clark3, Michael R. Pelton1, and Mel Sunquist2 September 30, 2002 1 Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee 2 Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida 3 USGS, Southern Appalachian Field Laboratory, University of Tennessee ii Population Ecology of Black Bears in the Okefenokee-Osceola Ecosystem Abstract: We studied black bears (Ursus americanus) on 2 study areas in the Okefenokee-Osceola ecosystem in north Florida and southeast Georgia from 1995–1999 to determine population characteristics (size, density, relative abundance, distribution, sex and age structure, mortality rates, natality, and recruitment) and habitat needs. We captured 205 different black bears (124M: 81F) 345 times from June 1995 to September 1998. Overall, adult bears on Osceola were 19% heavier than those on Okefenokee (t = 2.96, df = 148, P = 0.0036). We obtained 13,573 radiolocations from 87 (16M:71F) individual bears during the period of study. Seventeen mortalities of radiocollared bears were documented on Okefenokee, with hunting mortality accounting for 70.6% of these deaths. We documented only 2 (8%) mortalities of radiocollared females from Osceola; both were illegally killed. Annual survival rates for radiocollared females were lower on Okefenokee ( x = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.80–0.93) than on Osceola ( x = 0.97, 95% CI = 2 0.92–1.00; 0.05 = 3.98, 1 df, P = 0.0460). Overall, 67 bears (51M:16F) were taken by hunters on the Okefenokee study area from 1995–1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2002 Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest Steven T. Dobey University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Dobey, Steven T., "Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2002. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4533 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Steven T. Dobey entitled "Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Wildlife and Fisheries Science. Michael R. Pelton, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gary McCracken, Lisa Muller, Joseph Clark Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Steven T.
    [Show full text]