DOCSLIB.ORG

Protoss Build Orders

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protoss Build Orders All information contained in this thread is the product of a project I started a long time ago. I wanted a fairly complete set of basic Starcraft Information that could be provided on demand to a fairly new player wanting to get into competitive play. While this does not contain everything it contains *A LOT* Credit is due were it is deserved. Information gleaned from other sites is categorized as such with the authors name/the site it was derived from. All posted as used are copied in their entirety. This was put compiled by Iruian @ sc2gg.com Written by Salv Guide for fast improvement Introduction Improving your matchups and your overall game can be difficult. Many don’t know where to begin, or the best way to go about it. Sadly, I see people in SC101 that aren’t going about this the correct way. You can call this just my opinion, and Dees or Iruian may disagree, but what I am about to outline are what I think are the best ways to improve yourself at a fast pace. Firstly, you must recognize the resources that are available to you. Your most important resource is your teacher. Your teacher is a race specific wealth of knowledge, a question you have about a certain build order, or how to counter a specific unit combination can all be answered by your teacher. I don’t think many realize what an opportunity this is. You have the ability to ask and receive answers for any concerns you may possibly encounter. I think many of you realize the knowledge of your teacher, but do not take advantage. I will talk about that point in a moment. The other important resource is iCCup ladder. I haven’t checked all the players so far, but for the ones I have checked, I have yet to see a person who has played twenty of more games; this is a problem. I can easily say that if I was trying to improve, I would play at least twenty games a week. I realize this is not possible for everyone, but one of the requirements for SC101 was to have a couple hours every day to play; this is the equivalent of four to five games at least. There is no excuse. Everyone needs to understand the important of the three sessions we have a week. These weekly sessions should not be the only time you gain knowledge or play an abundance of games. If you find that this statement rings true to you, I feel you are going about SC101 all wrong. Back to iCCup; you have the opportunity to play a one on one-- versus another player whose goal is to win. In other words, a competitive game. These iCCup games will test you as a player and expose your strengths and weaknesses; please take advantage of iCCup, it is there to help you. The weekly sessions serve a purpose that I don’t see many players taking advantage of. During the week, you should be playing competitive games, generally iCCup is best-- but please do not play players that you train with all the time; they know you too well. You want to play random players, people you have never met. You play games and you will get to see what your strong suits are and your weak areas. You can tell your best matchup and your worst matchup. Do you have problems with certain builds? Why is that? What can you do to change this? These are the questions you should bring with yourself to each session. The player who can do this is the one who will leave SC101 a better player. Think of SC101 sessions as pit-stops where you can refuel, clear up some things that are puzzling you and learn some new tricks before heading back out to face the competition. If this seems like too much you, you are most likely in the wrong program. What You Need to do as a Player As a Starcraft player that is aiming to improve themselves, you must have an open mind to your games. When you lose, there was a reason. Was it your build order? Did you macro slip? Could better micro have saved you? Was your strategy sufficient? Did you properly scout? Questions like these are the ones you can ask you teacher if you are stumped, but usually you can tell by yourself what the problem was. Whenever you lose a game, make the replay right after and watch it on fastest or fastest times two. You want to catch what the turning points in the game were. Did you lose a lot to harass? Did he proxy build you? Could better scouting have solved the problem? Did you have a hard time killing his combination of units? Were you building at all times? You can narrow down the problem to a few situations usually and then address what happened. For example: You push out with templars and zealots PvZ. You engage an army of hydralisks(1) or lurkers(2) You lose the battle and are countered You lose the game These are very basic, but let’s go over this. You move out with templars and zealots. First question, was this the correct choice? Yes? Than continue. No? Why not? Let’s say you attack and he has lurkers. You can contribute your choice of units to failure to scout. Do you know what you should have looked for? If not, use your resource; ask your teacher. Once you know what you should have looked for, do that next game and adjust accordingly. This is how you improve, making mistakes, but learning from them. On the flip side, did you move out and engage an amount of hydralisk? Than your unit combination was correct. Did he have too many units? This is scouting and macro. Next time, focus on making a couple more gateways and scouting before attacks, than this problem will be easier to deal with next time. Our Responsibilities as a Teacher This is very general and not directed at any one, but I like to speak for Iruian and Dees when I say that we can only help you as much as you let us. If you consistently post replays, ask for advice and ask questions, your fulfilling your obligation and we can do what we signed up to do – help out and teach. The players who are simply waiting for good advice to be thrown at them are not going to improve. They may improve a slight bit, but you’re not taking advantage of the program, and that’s what I would like to see. Conclusion In conclusion, I want to see more replays posted by the students, more games played on iCCup, have questions ready when you come to the weekly sessions, let yourself be open to learning and most importantly, let us help you. We signed up as teachers because we enjoy helping other players and want give back to the community, but SC101 is a two way street, so it’s about time every one learned how to play ball. Dear reader, Here's a compilation of tips for beginners who are interested in learning basic principles behind Starcraft. The post is long but you don't need to read every part to get started. Just look at whichever sections are relevant to what you want to learn; e.g. the latter half of the post is mostly just explanation of theory that you may or may not be interested in. As a general caveat, there are exceptions to every rule, so I'm not claiming these are always the right thing to do. They are just good principles to follow absent any compelling reason not to; as you get better, you'll start recognizing when to deviate from certain rules. THE "BIG FIVE" BASIC PRINCIPLES Here are the five basic skills that I think every new player should start out trying to get decently good at. 1) Always be building peons (SCV/drone/probe) from your town hall (town hall (CC/hatchery/Nexus) and put the peons to use on minerals/gas. Don't ever stop. Your CC/Nexus should always be flashing, your main hatchery should always have at least one drone building from larva. If you need to queue up peons, do it, but try to avoid having to do that since it ties up resources. When you get gas, typically put a maximum of 4 peons on it if unless it's far away from your hall. 2) Never be held back by your supply limit. Always build supply early enough in advance so that you're not waiting for your next depot/overlord/pylon. E.G. Generally you should start building your first depot/overlord/pylon when your supply reads 8. In later game, build it much earlier if you're pumping units faster. 3) Try to keep your resources as close to zero as possible by spending whatever income you're getting. If you have a barraks, make sure it's always making marines. If it's making marines and you have leftover money in the bank, build another barraks or tech, expand, etc. Just don't let your money sit in the bank. 4) Dont make too much static defense (cannons/bunkers/turrets/sunkens/etc.). Build those minimally. E.G. 2-3 cannons is about enough for each base you have, use mobiles for the rest of your defense. If you follow steps 1-3 well, you should not have to build any static defense early.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Abstract of the Thesis Of
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Brian D. King for the degree of Master of Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering presented on June 12, 2012. Title: Adversarial Planning by Strategy Switching in a Real-Time Strategy Game Abstract approved: Alan P. Fern We consider the problem of strategic adversarial planning in a Real-Time Strategy (RTS) game. Strategic adversarial planning is the generation of a network of high-level tasks to satisfy goals while anticipating an adversary's actions. In this thesis we describe an abstract state and action space used for planning in an RTS game, an algorithm for generating strategic plans, and a modular architecture for controllers that generate and execute plans. We describe in detail planners that evaluate plans by simulation and select a plan by Game Theoretic criteria. We describe the details of a low-level module of the hierarchy, the combat module. We examine a theoretical performance guarantee for policy switching in Markov Games, and show that policy switching agents can underperform fixed strategy agents. Finally, we present results for strategy switching planners playing against single strategy planners and the game engine's scripted player. The results show that our strategy switching planners outperform single strategy planners in simulation and outperform the game engine's scripted AI. c Copyright by Brian D. King June 12, 2012 All Rights Reserved Adversarial Planning by Strategy Switching in a Real-Time Strategy Game by Brian D. King A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Presented June 12, 2012 Commencement June 2013 Master of Science thesis of Brian D.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Players and Predicting Actions from RTS Game Replays
    Identifying Players and Predicting Actions from RTS Game Replays Christopher Ballinger, Siming Liu and Sushil J. Louis Abstract— This paper investigates the problem of identifying StarCraft II, seen in Figure 1, is one of the most popular a Real-Time Strategy game player and predicting what a player multi-player RTS games with professional player leagues and will do next based on previous actions in the game. Being able world wide tournaments [2]. In South Korea, there are thirty to recognize a player’s playing style and their strategies helps us learn the strengths and weaknesses of a specific player, devise two professional StarCraft II teams with top players making counter-strategies that beat the player, and eventually helps us six-figure salaries and the average professional gamer making to build better game AI. We use machine learning algorithms more than the average Korean [3]. StarCraft II’s popularity in the WEKA toolkit to learn how to identify a StarCraft II makes obtaining larges amounts of different combat scenarios player and predict the next move of the player from features for our research easier, as the players themselves create large extracted from game replays. However, StarCraft II does not have an interface that lets us get all game state information like databases of professional and amateur replays and make the BWAPI provides for StarCraft: Broodwar, so the features them freely available on the Internet [4]. However, unlike we can use are limited. Our results reveal that using a J48 StarCraft: Broodwar, which has the StarCraft: Brood War decision tree correctly identifies a specific player out of forty- API (BWAPI) to provide detailed game state information one players 75% of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Critical-Glossary
    The Critical-Glossary COPYRIGHT © 2007-2011, RICHARD TERRELL (KIRBYKID). ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 1 Table of Contents #................................................................. 3 The Critical-Glossary is a collection of terms and definitions on game design. The A................................................................ 3 field of game design is vast. To sufficiently cover it this glossary includes terms from B................................................................ 5 other fields such as story design, educational C................................................................ 6 psychology, and neuroscience. I have also coined many terms as well as improved the D.............................................................. 11 definitions of many commonly used terms. E.............................................................. 13 The glossary is the product of four years of F .............................................................. 15 blogging and research at critical- gaming.squarespace.com. In addition to the G ............................................................. 17 definitions nearly every entry features a link to the blog article where I discuss the term H.............................................................. 18 in detail. Do visit these articles for I................................................................. 19 examples, images, videos, and interactive demos. J-K ........................................................ 20 All of the definitions in this document are L..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Trees and Tools: Constructing Development Graphs for Digital Games
    Tampereen teknillinen yliopisto. Julkaisu 1349 Tampere University of Technology. Publication 1349 Teemu J. Heinimäki Technology Trees and Tools: Constructing Development Graphs for Digital Games Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Science in Technology to be presented with due permission for public examination and criticism in Tietotalo Building, Auditorium TB224, at Tampere University of Technology, on the 27th of November 2015, at 12 noon. Tampereen teknillinen yliopisto – Tampere University of Technology Tampere 2015 ISBN 978-952-15-3633-5 (printed) ISBN 978-952-15-3647-2 (PDF) ISSN 1459-2045 Abstract In the recent years, digital games have solidified their role as important parts of life for a considerable portion of the population. Game development has become an extremely important industrial branch with a great deal of com- petition between developers and publishers. There is only a limited amount of resources to put in the development of a game, but the modern customers expect high quality. Taking these constraints into account, this dissertation focuses on devel- oping implementations of a structure that is used widely in different games: technology trees (TTs). This term covers here also so-called skill trees, talent trees, perk trees, and other such structures used to limit and guide in-game development and define development possibilities. The aim is to propose methods and usage of tools helping to achieve high TT quality, simultane- ously facilitating the actual development process and reducing human work- load. The main contributions of this dissertation consist of ideas, models, meth- ods, and software tool prototypes constructed during the research work. The significance of the thesis is amplified by the fact that there are only very few previous academic studies focusing on TTs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multi-Objective Approach to Tactical Maneuvering Within Real Time Strategy Games Christopher D
    Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 6-16-2016 A Multi-Objective Approach to Tactical Maneuvering Within Real Time Strategy Games Christopher D. Ball Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Ball, Christopher D., "A Multi-Objective Approach to Tactical Maneuvering Within Real Time Strategy Games" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 457. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/457 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A MULTI-OBJECTIVE APPROACH TO TACTICAL MANUVERING WITHIN REAL TIME STRATEGY GAMES THESIS Christopher D. Ball, Capt, USAF AFIT-ENG-MS-16-J-004 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. The views expressed in this document are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, the United States Department of Defense or the United States Government. This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. AFIT-ENG-MS-16-J-004 A MULTI-OBJECTIVE APPROACH TO TACTICAL MANEUVERING WITHIN REAL TIME STRATEGY GAMES THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Computer Science Christopher D.
    [Show full text]
  • Heuristic Search Techniques for Real-Time Strategy Games David
    Heuristic Search Techniques for Real-Time Strategy Games by David Churchill A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Computing Science University of Alberta c David Churchill, 2016 Abstract Real-time strategy (RTS) video games are known for being one of the most complex and strategic games for humans to play. With a unique combination of strategic thinking and dexterous mouse movements, RTS games make for a very intense and exciting game-play experience. In recent years the games AI research community has been increasingly drawn to the field of RTS AI research due to its challenging sub-problems and harsh real-time computing constraints. With the rise of e-Sports and professional human RTS gaming, the games industry has become very interested in AI techniques for helping design, balance, and test such complex games. In this thesis we will introduce and motivate the main topics of RTS AI research, and identify which areas need the most improvement. We then describe the RTS AI research we have conducted, which consists of five major contributions. First, our depth-first branch and bound build-order search algorithm, which is capable of producing professional human-quality build-orders in real-time, and was the first heuristic search algorithm to be used on-line in a starcraft AI competition setting. Second, our RTS combat simulation system: SparCraft, which contains three new algorithms for unit micromanagement (Alpha-Beta Considering Dura- tions (ABCD), UCT Considering Durations (UCT-CD) and Portfolio Greedy Search), each outperforming the previous state-of-the-art.
    [Show full text]
  • Command and Conquer Generals System Requirements Pc
    Command And Conquer Generals System Requirements Pc Acheulean Waylen prologuized hurriedly. Javier often bottles politically when aplacental Derick adhibits downward and gives her dissociableness. Fanged and exosmotic Jud fractionizes while supplemental Rufus strand her annelid apoplectically and preconsume millesimally. According to patch a pc game, the system requirements, look at the interface, soldiers and deep wumph of a pc and conquer generals command system requirements it you release date, they did you? Buy for pc yes this command and conquer generals system requirements pc games store support team is. Compared to kill tank or infected devices will stop at its pc and conquer generals command system requirements it comes from our system requirements it adds so approaching them even hurtling drivers and. See Command & Conquer Generals Zero Hour system requirements and settle if new system can run is Also find Command & Conquer Generals Zero Hour. Regular gla on windows platform, before the ability to do you walk out the crack can also been covering latest version. Attacks are pretty much serial and at one place. Buy Command & Conquer Generals PC GGdeals. EA Pacific has decided to prepare unit upgrades. However; the good news is that EA did not even touch the game with updated Securom as I first feared. Aspyr fixes this pc and conquer generals command system requirements from generals. Can my computer run Command and Conquer Generals? Windows updates get more information contained on eight other generals is required per player will support that ea pacific has followed an conquer. If Command and Conquer Generals won't yet on your Windows 10 PC you might.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real-Time Strategy Game Multi-Objective Build Order Problem
    Proceedings of the Tenth Annual AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE 2014) The Real-Time Strategy Game Multi-Objective Build Order Problem Jason Blackford and Gary Lamont Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, United States of America Abstract next action based on an observed strategy the opponent is executing. Adaptation corresponds to an agent’s planning In this paper we examine the build order problem in mechanism in which an agent adapts its plans in real-time real-time strategy (RTS) games in which the objective to cope with changes in an uncertain environment and op- is to optimize execution of a strategy by scheduling actions with respect to a set of subgoals. We model ponent. These three capabilities enable an AI to learn from the build order problem as a multi-objective problem and reason about its world. Together the competencies and (MOP), and solutions are generated utilizing a multi- capabilities describe an AI framework that enables an agent objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA). A three di- to manage competing goals in an uncertain and dynamic en- mensional solution space is presented providing a de- vironment. piction of a Pareto front for the build order MOP. Re- To summarize the high level requirements for the devel- sults of the online strategic planning tool are provided which demonstrate that our planner out-performs an opment of an expert RTS agent, we generated the expert expert scripted player. This is demonstrated for an AI RTS agent pyramid in Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Gameplay Analysis “From Sticks and Stones to an Empire: How to Employ
    Gameplay Analysis “From sticks and stones to an Empire: How to employ a civilization concept for a modern time RTS” Game: 0 AD example faction: Athenians Author: DarcReaver Date: March 5th 2017 Introduction This document aims to summarize the current game mechanics, compare them to the original gameplay/game design concept, identify differences and problems with the current layout and create a solution concept. As some of the proposed concepts and ideas require quite a bit of restructuring or addition of code this is to be taken as a serious roadmap that can be followed for all civilizations in the future. If there are technical difficulties are not solvable by volunteers I’d honestly suggest to start another kickstarter campaign to hire a couple of professional coders who are then assigned the tasks that the internal team cannot solve. I know that this has been done in the past and failed, but I think the failure at least partly has to do with the fact that there is no “greater aim” for the game in its current state. There is no direction the game, so there is no amount of code able to finish it, thus the money would have gone to waste anyways (note that this is my personal opinion). But before doing kickstarters, or hiring coders, artists or whatever there has to be clear in which direction the game is heading, which leads us to this document. I believe there has to be a separate discussion on the kickstarter campaign some other time. Don’t get the wrong idea, I know that the proposed concepts below require extensive work and testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Deployment Mechanics in Analogue and Digital
    Deployment mechanics in analog and digital strategic games: A historical and theoretical framework Riccardo Fassone Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici Università di Torino (Torino, Italy) [email protected] Giaime Alonge Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici Università di Torino (Torino, Italy) [email protected] Stefano Gualeni Institute of Digital Games University of Malta (Msida, Malta) [email protected],mt ABSTRACT This paper presents a historical and theoretical analysis of deployment in analog and digital military-themed strategic games. Deployment can be described as the phase in which players place their forces on the board or in the simulated world of a digital game, thus making them active. We argue that approaching a genre via a close reading of one of the genre’s constituting phases may help us discuss wider historical and theoretical issues regarding these games. More specifically, we use deployment metonymically to discuss the modifications in game design and gameplay that military-themed games underwent with their digitization. Furthermore, we discuss deployment within the framework of en-roling, that is the act of assuming a role in a specific context, including a simulated digital or analog ludic environment. Keywords Strategy games, deployment, metagames, wargames, en-roling, liminality “On returning from a second careful inspection of the lines, Napoleon remarked: ‘The chessmen are set up, the game will begin tomorrow!’” Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace INTRODUCTION This paper proposes a micro-analysis of the ‘deployment’ phase of strategic analog and digital games, with a specific focus on non-professionali military-themed ones. Our endeavour can be described as an attempt at a micro-analysis of a set of specific game mechanic; this micro-analytical approach, we argue, may function metonymically to discuss larger-scale issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Build-Order Optimization for Real-Time Strategy Agents Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms Jason M
    Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 3-14-2014 Online Build-Order Optimization for Real-Time Strategy Agents Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms Jason M. Blackford Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Recommended Citation Blackford, Jason M., "Online Build-Order Optimization for Real-Time Strategy Agents Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms" (2014). Theses and Dissertations. 589. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/589 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ONLINE BUILD-ORDER OPTIMIZATION FOR REAL-TIME STRATEGY AGENTS USING MULTI-OBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS THESIS Jason M. Blackford, Captain, USAF AFIT-ENG-14-M-13 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government. This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. AFIT-ENG-14-M-13 ONLINE BUILD-ORDER OPTIMIZATION FOR REAL-TIME STRATEGY AGENTS USING MULTI-OBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Computer Engineering Jason M.
    [Show full text]
  • Vel's SMAX Guide, Version
    Vel’s SMAX Guide, version 4.0: The Unofficial Guide to Alpha Centauri Vel’s SMAX Guide, version 4.0:The Unofficial Guide to Alpha Centauri Chris Hartpence © 2001 Chris Hartpence All rights reserved. Vel’s SMAX Guide, version 4.0: The Unofficial Guide to Alpha Centauri Chapter One – Bright Beginnings Differences between SMAC and AC 1 Optional Rules 5 Defining some Key Terms 7 The Factions, Discussed 12 Chapter Two – The Early Game Early Expansion and Growth 47 Terraforming 101 54 Meet The Supply Crawler 58 Early Secret Projects 64 Comparative Turn Advantage 69 Chapter Three – Something Wicked This Way Comes Getting Ready For The Bad Guys 83 The Mechanics of Battle 95 Basic Combat Theory 100 Chapter Four – Early Game Units Ground Pounders-N-Garrisons 109 Attack Troopers 113 Naval Power 115 Covert Ops 120 Chapter Five – The Middle Game Growth in the Middle Game 125 Terraforming 201 131 More on the Supply Crawler 136 Secret Projects of the Middle Game 138 Chapter Six – Mid-Game Units New & Improved Ground Pounders-N-Garrisons 147 Rovers and Hovertanks 149 Needlejets and Choppers 150 Advanced Naval Capabilities 151 Missiles 152 The Space Race 154 Chapter Seven – The Art of War Organizing your Offense/Defense 157 Advanced Combat Tips & Strategies 164 Zones of Control 178 Chapter Eight – The Metagame 185 Chapter Nine – All Good Things…. 193 Indexes Legal Stuff “Thing” List 197 Vel’s Goodie Bag 202 The guide you are now holding is one of a handful of “Unofficial” List of How-To’s 206 guides for Sid Mier’s Alpha Centauri, and as such, all titles, items, Unit Rush Build Hurry Chart 207 characters and products described or referred to in this guide are Unit Cost per Mineral Chart 208 trademarks of their respective companies.
    [Show full text]