DOCSLIB.ORG

A1(M) at Kirby Hill, Ripons Services, Baldersby Gate, Motel Leeming

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A1(M) at Kirby Hill, Ripons Services, Baldersby Gate, Motel Leeming Mr Chris May Our Ref: (A) APP/E2734/A/09/2102196 Marrons (B) APP/G2713/V/09/2108815 1 Meridian South (C) APP/E2734/V/10/2133571 Meridian Business Park (D) APP/E2734/V/10/2133577 Leicester, LE19 1WY (E) APP/G2713/V/10/2133567 Mr David Brocklehurst Wardhadaway Sandgate House 102 Quayside Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 3DX Mr Peter Gleave DPP Apsley House 78 Wellington Street Leeds, LS1 2EQ Mr Christopher Simpkins RPS Suites 55 & 58 Cherry Orchard East Kembrey Park Swindon, SN2 8UQ Mr Jeremy Williams ID Planning Atlas House 31 King Street Leeds, LS1 2HL 16 October 2012 Dear Sirs, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTIONS 77 & 78 MOTORWAY SERVICE AREA (MSA) PROPOSALS ON THE A1(M) AT KIRBY HILL (appeal) and RIPON SERVICES, BALDERSBY GATE & MOTEL LEEMING (call-ins), along with TRUCKSTOP PROPOSAL AT FAIRFIELD FARM, LEEMING BAR (CONEYGARTH) (call-in) 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the principal Inspector, R R Lyon MA CEng MICE MRTPI FCIHT, who held a public local inquiry into the planning appeals and called-in planning application listed above on various dates between 2 November 2010 and 4 February 2011 and to the report of the second Inspector, David Richards BSocSci DipTP MRTPI, who held the Department for Communities and Local Government Tel 0303 444 1626 Zone 1/J1 Email [email protected] Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU re-opened public local inquiry between 12 February and 2 March 2012. These Inquiries were held to consider your clients’ applications/appeals: Case A (Kirby Hill): appeal by Heather Ive Associates against the decision of Harrogate Borough Council to refuse an outline application for a core twin-sided motorway service area at Kirby Hill comprising amenity building, petrol filling station, heavy goods vehicle amenity building, vehicle parking, landscaping and associated infrastructure with all matters reserved except for access from the A1(M), in accordance with application Ref 08/05860/EIAMAJ, dated 18 December 2008. Case B (Motel Leeming Services): called-in outline application by Mr Carl Les to Hambleton District Council for a motorway service area at Motel Leeming Services comprising amenity buildings, lodge, manager’s accommodation, petrol filling station, drive through restaurant, parking and turning areas and landscaping with all matters reserved except access, in accordance with application Ref 09/01202/OUT, dated 6 May 2009. Case C (Ripon Services): called-in outline application by Jaytee (Rainton) LLP to Harrogate Borough Council for the erection of a motorway service area at the junction of the A1 and A61, comprising of an amenity building, hotel, filling station, sewage treatment plant, balancing pond, new access from the A61, parking, landscaping and associated works with all matters reserved except access, in accordance with application Ref 10/01982/EIAMAJ, dated 6 May 2009. Case D (Baldersby Gate): called-in outline application by Refined Estates Limited to Harrogate Borough Council for the erection of a Junction Motorway Service Area comprising; amenity building, lodge, petrol filling station, parking including heavy goods vehicle parking, shower and toilet facilities, a police post, landscaping and associated infrastructure works in accordance with application Ref 10/02490/EIAMAJ, dated 7 June 2010. Case E (Coneygarth Truck Stop): called-in application by Exelby Services Limited to Hambleton District Council for the development of land within the curtilage of Fairfield Farm to form a Truck Stop Service Area for the relocation of an existing service area from Londonderry to Leeming Bar, comprising: HGV/LGV re-fuelling, fuel bunkering/tank farm and associated forecourt shop including overnight and rest-stop parking and driver welfare facilities in accordance with application Ref 10/00624/FUL, dated 17 February 2010. 2. The Case A appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State’s determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 on 5 May 2009 because it relates to proposals against which another Government department has raised objections or has a major interest. In pursuance of section 77 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, the Secretary of State directed that cases B, C, D and E be referred to him instead of being dealt with by the relevant planning authority because he considered that the proposals may conflict with national policies on important matters. The Direction relating to Case B was issued on 13 July 2009 and those for Cases C, D and E on 22 July 2010. Inspectors’ recommendations and summary of decisions 3. The principal Inspector (referred to in this letter as the first Inspector) recommended that the Case A appeal should be dismissed and planning permission refused, that the applications for Cases B and C should be refused and that planning permission should be granted for Cases D and E. The second Inspector did not disagree with these recommendations. However, for the reasons below, although the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspectors’ conclusions and recommendations in respect of Cases A, C and E, he disagrees with their conclusions and recommendation in respect of Cases B and D, and proposes to grant planning consent for Cases B and E. Copies of both Inspectors’ reports are enclosed. That of the first Inspector is referred to in this letter as “IR” and that of the second Inspector as “2IR”. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to those reports. Procedural matters 4. The application for costs made at the first Inquiry (IR1.1.1) and the two applications made at the second Inquiry (2IR1) are each the subject of separate decision letters which will be issued by the Secretary of State shortly. 5. The Secretary of State has noted the amendments to schemes as reported by the first Inspector at IR1.2.1 and is satisfied that, as these were all available at the first inquiry, no interests will be prejudiced by him basing his decisions on them. He has also noted the first Inspector’s rulings as reported at IR1.3.1-1.3.5 and is satisfied that, as these were made during the first Inquiry, it is appropriate for him to take them into account. The Secretary of State has also noted that, for the reasons given by the first Inspector (IR1.5.3), the evidence of the first witness for the Highways Agency (HA) relating to site specific matters was not tested at the Inquiry, and he accepts the inevitability of that. Environmental Statements 6. In reaching his decisions, the Secretary of State has taken into account the Environmental Statements (ESs) that were submitted under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 (the 1999 Regulations) in respect of all the proposals for which they were required. The Secretary of State agrees with the first Inspector that, with regard to Case C (IR14.4.47), the environmental information provided meets the necessary requirements; and he notes that EIAs were not required for Case B (IR1.4.4 and 14.6.4) and Case E (IR1.4.4). 7. With regard to Case A, the Secretary of State agrees with the first Inspector (IR14.3.9 and IR14.3.74) that the environmental information meets the necessary requirements and that the spread and presentation of information is within reasonable grounds. He has taken account of the first Inspector’s comments about the voluntary Regulation 19 submission (IR14.3.4-14.3.7), including the fact that it contains, in particular, a preliminary groundwater risk assessment associated with proposed on-site Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTW). Hence, given that he agrees with the first Inspector’s recommendation (IR14.3.85) that the alternative solution of an on-site WWTW would have virtually no prospect of being achieved and so should be discarded, he has not seen any need to use his powers to remedy any deficiencies in the voluntary Regulation 19 submission before coming to a decision on the overall merits of Case A. 8. In the case of Case D, the first Inspector concluded (IR144.5.15) that the environmental assessment before him was defective with regard to its assessment of earthworks, and so did not meet the requirements of the regulations. The Secretary of State agreed, and therefore issued a letter on 8 November 2011 (2IR1.2.1) which, inter alia, gave notice to the applicant, in accordance with Regulation 19(1) of the 1999 Regulations, to undertake a full assessment of the earthworks required to accommodate the proposed scheme. This further information was discussed at the second Inquiry (2IR2.1.1-2.5.14) and, for the reasons given at 2IR2.6.1-2.6.35, the Secretary of State agrees with the second Inspector’s conclusion at 2IR2.6.35 and 2IR9.1.1 that, while there may be increased impacts during the construction period due to a potential for the export of surplus cut material from the site, these would only be temporary and could be satisfactorily mitigated by means of an appropriate condition. The Secretary of State therefore agrees with both Inspectors (2IR2.6.35) that the proposal would result in moderate harm to the landscape character of the area, that the visual impact would be slight, and that both harms would lessen over time. Other matters arising following the close of the first Inquiry 9. Although the main reason for reopening the Inquiry was because the first Inspector had concluded (IR14.5.11) that the ES for case D as it then stood was defective with regard to its assessment of earthworks, there were also other issues upon which the Secretary of State considered that he needed further information to be assured that there would be no impediments to securing appropriate access between the A1 and each of the sites.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Agenda Document for Planning Committee (SBDC)
    Capswood, Oxford Road, Denham, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4LH 01895 837236 [email protected] www.southbucks.gov.uk Planning Committee Wednesday, 15 August 2018 at 4.15 pm Council Chamber, Capswood, Oxford Road, Denham A G E N D A Item 1. Evacuation Procedure 2. Apologies for Absence 3. Minutes (Pages 5 - 16) To approve the minutes of the Planning Committee held on 18 July 2018. 4. Declarations of Interest 5. Applications and Plans The files for each application are available for public inspection at the Council Offices. A. Committee decision required following a site visit and/or public speaking 17/02396/FUL - Police Station, Oxford Road, Denham, Buckinghamshire, SL9 7AL (Pages 17 - 30) 18/00884/RVC - Grafton House, 31 Camp Road, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire, SL9 7PG (Pages 31 - 36) Chief Executive: Bob Smith Director of Resources: Jim Burness Director of Services: Steve Bambrick PL/18/2173/FA - Car Park, 42-46 Station Road, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire (Pages 37 - 62) B. Committee decision required without a site visit or public speaking None C. Committee observations required on applications to other Authorities None D. To receive a list of applications already determined under delegated powers by the Head of Planning and Economic Development (Pages 63 - 92) For information 6. Verbal Update on Enforcement Matters (if any) 7. Planning Appeals and Schedule of Outstanding Matters (Pages 93 - 96) For information Note: All reports will be updated orally at the meeting if appropriate and may be supplemented by additional
    [Show full text]
  • Iver Motorway Service Area Response, February 2021
    President: Rt.Hon. the Lord Randall of Uxbridge Kt.PC. Planning Service Buckinghamshire Council King George V House King George V Road Amersham HP6 5AW February 2021 Dear Sir/Madam Re: Planning application PL/20/4332/0A Motorway Service Area between Junctions 15 and 16 near Iver Heath This application falls within the Colne Valley Regional Park (CVRP) and the Green Belt. Buckinghamshire Council and the former Chiltern and South Bucks Councils have been supporters of the CVRP since its inception. We hope the Council will continue to uphold the six objectives of the CVRP since this application represents the loss of farmland; the loss of 46 Ha of the CVRP and the Green Belt in a sensitive location; harm to recreational rights of way; harm to watercourses which run through the development, and the loss of, and harm to, existing grassland, woodland, hedgerows and their accompanying biodiversity. • This response to the planning application also looks at the case for the Motorway Service Areas affecting the CVRP, including the one in this location • The strategic planning context and the impact on the Green Belt • The extent of the harm arising from the scheme and • The scale of mitigation that should accompany the development if the very special circumstances’ (VSC) were to be accepted by the decision maker (whether the Council or Secretary of State). The case for an MSA in this location This application for a motorway service area is one of three currently being considered by local authorities along the north-western edge of the M25. All the operators state that there is a need for an MSA on this stretch of motorway between the existing Cobham and South Mimms MSAs.
    [Show full text]
  • England's Motorway Services Show Star Quality
    England’s Motorway Services show star quality 9 March 2015: Top 5* star ratings have been awarded to seven Motorway Service Stations from across the country as part of VisitEngland’s Motorway Service Area Quality Scheme. Whether travelling for business or leisure, Service Stations provide important stopping points for people visiting an area and this experience can add to the overall enjoyment of the trip. As National Tourist Board for England, VisitEngland assesses the quality of service and customer experience at service stations across the country to help encourage a high quality experience for all travellers. Five leading operators took part in this year’s quality scheme - Extra, Moto, Welcome Break, Roadchef and Westmorland, who collectively own 107 sites across England. A further 42 services will received a 4 Star rating and the remaining 58 services are rated as 3 Star. As part of the Scheme, VisitEngland Assessors anonymously visited all the operators’ individual sites twice over the last 12 months and completed a thorough quality report. On each visit, the Assessor looks at the whole of the customer journey, from initial arrival right through to the use of facilities, retail and catering outlets, to departure. The sites’ service stations are assessed on the quality of catering, cleanliness, staff, food, forecourt, retail, service, toilet facilities and overall site – which can include anything from the baby changing, coach parking space or facilities for dogs. Top 5* ratings have been awarded to the following Motorway Service stations: Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, Beaconsfield achieved an overall score of 90 per cent which means that Junction 2 of M40, Extra the services has now progressed from 4* to 5* in the last 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Pick up Points
    Pick Up Points Please note pick up times will be confirmed with your final joining details. Please note not all pickup points will run on every tour. Abercynon Ampthill Bakewell Aberdare Andover Baldock Aberdeen Annan Baldock Services (A1(M)) Aberdeen (ABZ) Annandale Water Services Banbury (A74(M)) Abergavenny Bangor Arbroath Abergele Banstead Armthorpe Abingdon Bargoed Arnold Abington Services (M74) Barking Arundel Accrington Barnet Ashbourne Acle Barnetby Top Services Ashburton (M180) Adlington Ashby-de-la-Zouch Barnoldswick Alcester Ashford Barnsley Alcester Oversley Mill Services (A46) Ashington Barnstaple Aldershot Ashton-in-Makerfield Barrow-in-Furness Aldridge Ashton-under-Lyne Barry Alfreton Aspatria Barton-le-Clay Alnwick Astley Barton-upon-Humber Alsager Atherstone Basildon Alton Atherton Basingstoke Altrincham Attleborough Bath Amble Audenshaw Batley Ambleside Axminster Battle Amersham Aylesbury Bawtry Amesbury Countess Ayr Beaconsfield Services (A303) Bembridge Beaconsfield Services Amesbury Solstice Park (M40) Britannia Grand Burstin Services (A303) Bebington Britannia Grand Ammanford Pont Abraham Scarborough Beccles Services (M4) Pick Up Points Please note pick up times will be confirmed with your final joining details. Please note not all pickup points will run on every tour. Beckenham Birmingham Bourne Bedford Birmingham (BHX) Bournemouth Bedlington Birtley Bournemouth (BOH) Bedworth Bishop Auckland Brackley Beeston Bishop's Cleeve Bracknell Belfast (BFS) Bishop's Stortford Bradford Belper Bradford-on-Avon Birchanger Green
    [Show full text]
  • APPLEGREEN PLC 2019 ANNUAL REPORT + FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Applegreen Spalding, UK 2 APPLEGREEN PLC ANNUAL REPORT and FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2019 3
    APPLEGREEN PLC 2019 ANNUAL REPORT + FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Applegreen Spalding, UK 2 APPLEGREEN PLC ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2019 3 A YEAR OF GROWTH Revenue Non-Fuel Gross Profit €4bn €3.1bn €430.6m €500m €3bn €2.0bn €0.9bn €400m €247.8m €1.4bn €2bn €0.1bn €300m €186.2m €1.1bn €1.2bn €113.6m €2.2bn €200m €92.8m €1.9bn €76.9m €36.6m €1bn €182.8m €100m €149.7m FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 APGN WB APGN WB Adjusted EBITDA Site Numbers (pre-IFRS 16) €140.4m 556 €150.0 600 472 €120.0 45 500 342 43 €90.0 €82.7m 400 €58.1m 243 200 511 €60.0 €39.8m 300 429 €28.9m €32.0m €10.3m 200 €30.0 €47.8m €57.7m 100 €0.0 0 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 APGN WB APGN WB Welcome Break refers to the assets acquired as part of the Welcome Break transaction in 2018 4 APPLEGREEN PLC ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2019 5 OVERVIEW Applegreen plc is a high growth roadside convenience retail business operating in Ireland, the United Kingdom and North America 556 SITES/ Since the company’s foundation in 1992 with We have now established a large Petrol Filling one site in Dublin, we have always aimed to Station (PFS) footprint in the US and our aim 660 QUALITY provide a superior customer experience and is to expand our presence as a recognised value for money.
    [Show full text]
  • Warrington Motorway Service Area, J11 M62
    Extra MSA Group Warrington Motorway Service Area, J11 M62 Replacement Planning Statement Revision 07 20th January 2020 Revision Record Revision Date of Revision Nature of Author Checked By Reference Revision 03 10/01/2020 Formatting and SC DR updates 04 15/01/2020 Reflect to SC SC Counsel Advice 05 17/01/2020 Reflect to SC SC Counsel Advice 06 17/01/2020 Reflect to SC SC Counsel Advice 07 19/01/2020 - SC SC Report Author SC Report Date January 2020 Project No. 4151 Document Ref. P0-TP-SPA-RP-P4151-0020 Revision 07 2 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 4 2. Background to Motorway Service Areas in the UK and Extra MSA Group ...................................................................................................... 8 3. Warrington MSA Junction 11 M62 – Site Description and Planning History .................................................................................................. 15 4. Development Proposals Overview .................................................... 27 5. Stakeholder Engagement Summary ................................................. 55 6. Statutory Policy Context and Other Relevant Policies .................. 64 7. Planning Assessment and Justification .............................................. 89 A) Compliance with National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF 19) ............................................................................................................... 90 B) Compliance with the Warrington Local Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Conservation Upper Thames Branch Butterfly Sightings Archive - January to December 2012
    Butterfly Conservation Upper Thames Branch Butterfly Sightings Archive - January to December 2012 ~ Wednesday 26th December 2012 ~ Ian Elphick sent the following report on Saturday 23rd December: "Had a text message from my daughter in Bracknell, Berks asking if butterflies should be flying at this time of year. On questioning, she described a Red Admiral she had just seen flying across the road outside her house." ~ Tuesday 4th December 2012 ~ Richard O'Dare reported the following: "I was at Little Marlow gravel pit (Bucks) today, 4th December, and this Peacock was enjoying the sunshine. Hopefully it will find somewhere to shelter from the cold nights." Peacock Photo © Richard O'Dare ~ Tuesday 19th November 2012 ~ Dave Wilton reported the following: "Our first organised Brown Hairstreak egg hunt of the season went off successfully on Sunday 18th November at Slade Camp, Shotover on the east side of Oxford. The ten participants found 25 eggs, numbers having almost returned to "normal" for the site after last winter's very low count of just 9 eggs. An early-instar Drinker Moth caterpillar was also seen, having crawled out of the grass (its foodplant) to hibernate on a blackthorn stem - they are encountered quite regularly while looking for Brown Hairstreak eggs. Our next egg hunt will be on Shotover Plain this coming Friday morning, 23rd November (see link above)." Dave Maunder sent the following sighting: "Last Wednesday, 14th November, I saw a male Brimstone fly past me while cycling to work along the A41 Aston Clinton road (Bucks) in the morning sun." ~ Wednesday 14th November 2012 ~ Chris Griffiths reported the following: "I thought you might be interested to know that I saw a Brimstone in my garden in west Reading, Berks at 12.15 this afternoon (14th November)." Dave Ferguson reports seeing a Red Admiral flying around his garden in Beaconsfield, Bucks yesterday, 13th November.
    [Show full text]
  • (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1997 No. 624 HOUSING, ENGLAND AND WALES The Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997 Made - - - - 5th March 1997 Laid before Parliament 7th March 1997 Coming into force - - 1st April 1997 The Secretary of State for the Environment, as respects England, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 17 of the Housing Act 1996(1) and section 1AA(3)(a) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967(2) and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Order— Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st April 1997. Designated rural areas 2. The following areas shall be designated rural areas for the purposes of section 17 of the Housing Act 1996 (the right to acquire) and section 1AA(3)(a) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (additional right to enfranchise)— (a) the parishes in the districts of the East Riding of Yorkshire, Hartlepool, Middlesborough, North East Lincolnshire, North Lincolnshire, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees specified in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, VI and VII of Schedule 1 to this Order and in the counties of Durham, Northumberland, North Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, Tyne and Wear and West Yorkshire specified in Parts VIII, IX, X, XI,
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2015, Yorkshire
    Yorkshire Register 2015 HERITAGE AT RISK 2015 / YORKSHIRE Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Cumbria 1 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 1 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 1 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 23 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 23 North Lincolnshire (UA) 25 North Yorkshire 27 Craven 27 Hambleton 28 Harrogate 33 North York Moors (NP) 37 Richmondshire 45 Ryedale 48 Scarborough 64 Selby 67 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 71 South Yorkshire 74 Barnsley 74 Doncaster 76 Peak District (NP) 79 Rotherham 80 Sheffield 83 West Yorkshire 86 Bradford 86 Calderdale 91 Kirklees 96 Leeds 101 Wakefield 107 York (UA) 110 II Yorkshire Summary 2015 e have 694 entries on the 2015 Heritage at Risk Register for Yorkshire, making up 12.7% of the national total of 5,478 entries. The Register provides an Wannual snapshot of historic sites known to be at risk from neglect, decay or inappropriate development. Nationally, there are more barrows on the Register than any other type of site. The main risk to their survival is ploughing. The good news is that since 2014 we have reduced the number of barrows at risk by over 130, by working with owners and, in particular, Natural England to improve their management. This picture is repeated in Yorkshire, where the greatest concentration of barrows at risk is in the rich farmland of the Wolds.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Regulatory Functions Committee Venue
    Agenda Meeting: Planning and Regulatory Functions Committee Venue: The Grand Meeting Room, Ground Floor, 1 Racecourse Lane, Northallerton, DL7 8QZ Date: Tuesday, 10 September 2019 at 10.00 a.m. PLEASE NOTE: The Brierley Building (main County Hall building) is closed now until July 2020. All Committee meetings will be held in either No. 1 or No. 3 Racecourse Lane, Northallerton, DL7 8QZ. Please note the venue above for the location of this meeting. Visitors please report to main reception which is located in No. 3 Racecourse Lane and you will be guided to the venue. Recording is allowed at County Council, committee and sub-committee meetings which are open to the public, please give due regard to the Council’s protocol on audio/visual recording and photography at public meetings, a copy of which is available to download below. Anyone wishing to record is asked to contact, prior to the start of the meeting, the Officer whose details are at the foot of the first page of the Agenda. We ask that any recording is clearly visible to anyone at the meeting and that it is non-disruptive. http://democracy.northyorks.gov.uk Business 1. Minutes of the Meeting held on 23 July 2019. (Pages 5 to 16) 2. Declarations of Interest. Enquiries relating to this agenda please contact Steve Loach Tel: 01609 532216 or e-mail [email protected] Website: www.northyorks.gov.uk 3. Public Questions or Statements. Members of the public may ask questions or make statements at this meeting if they have given notice of their question/statement to Steve Loach of Democratic Services (contact details below) by midday on Thursday 5 September 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Assessment
    Number of Number of Alcohol refreshment off-trade Number of additional Location Name of MSA Served venues premises retailers 1 A1 (M) Baldock Services No 4 1 2 2 M40 Beaconsfield Services No 4 1 1 3 M62 Birch Services No 3 1 3 4 M11 Birchanger Green Services No 4 1 1 5 M65 Blackburn with Darwen Services No 2 1 6 A1(M) Blyth Services No 3 1 7 M5 Bridgwater Services No 3 1 8 M6 Burton-in-Kendal Services No 3 1 9 M62 Burtonwood Services No 3 1 10 A14/M11 Cambridge Services No 4 1 1 11 M4 Cardiff Gate Services Yes 2 1 1 12 M4 Cardiff West Services No 3 1 13 M6 Charnock Richard Services Yes 5 1 14 M40 Cherwell Valley Services No 4 1 1 15 M56 Chester Services No 3 1 16 M4 Chieveley Services No 3 1 1 17 M25 Clacket Lane Services No 3 1 18 M6 Corley Services No 5 19 M5 Cullompton Services No 2 1 20 M18 Doncaster North Services No 3 1 21 M1 Donington Park Services No 3 1 22 A1 (M) Durham Services No 3 1 23 M5 Exeter Services Yes 2 1 1 24 A1/M62 Ferrybridge Services No 3 1 1 25 M3 Fleet Services No 6 1 1 26 M5 Frankley Services No 3 1 1 27 M5 Gordano Services No 4 1 1 28 M62 Hartshead Moor Services No 5 1 29 M4 Heston Eastbound No 3 1 30 M4 Heston Westbound No 4 1 31 M6 Hilton Park Services No 4 1 1 32 M42 Hopwood Park Services No 4 1 1 33 M6 J38 Truckstop Yes 1 1 34 M6 Keele Services No 5 1 35 M6 Killington Lake Services No 3 1 36 M6 Knutsford Services No 4 1 1 37 M6 Lancaster (Forton) Services No 3 1 2 38 M1 Leicester (Markfield) Services No 1 39 M1 Leicester Forest East Services No 4 40 M4 Leigh Delamere Services No 6 1 4 41 M1 London Gateway
    [Show full text]
  • Motorway Service User Survey 2019
    Overall report August 2019 Motorway Services User Survey 2019 Background and Usage patterns Overall experience 1. approach 2. 3. View on revisiting 4. Reasons for . MSA usage 6. & spontaneous visiting 5 MSA comments Appendix 2 Background Transport Focus represents the interest of users of England’s motorways and major ‘A’ roads, known as the Strategic Road Network (SRN). As part of its work, Transport Focus has been tracking how well Motorway Service Areas (MSAs) are meeting the needs of different SRN user groups. For the 3rd year of the project, Transport Focus engaged BVA BDRC to conduct the survey of user satisfaction with MSAs. Specific objectives for 2019 included: Consistently and robustly Understand the effect Identify the key drivers of measure user satisfaction visiting an MSA has on satisfaction and intention to across All MSAs visitor temperament revisit 3 Project approach/ Overall, interviews took place at 111 out of the 112 MSAs methodology in England (Stop 24 not participating), achieving 11,609 responses across 6 different operators: Extra, Roadchef, Welcome Break, Moto, Westmorland and Euro Garages. Tablet devices were used to interview visitors upon exit, to achieve in-the-moment recollections of their experience. • 2019 fieldwork – 8th Feb to 17th April • 2018 fieldwork – 12th Feb to 12th April • 2017 fieldwork – 13th Feb to 9th April Six six-hour interview shifts were completed at each individual MSA in 2019; four weekday and two at weekends. Individual MSAs are equally weighted within the data, meaning each site counts equally towards overall results. 4 Usage patterns 5 5 Visitor Respondent type (%) Leisure Business Commuter Professional* profile All MSA average 2019 63 22 5 11 All MSA average 2018 65 18 7 10 Gender Age (%) (%) 20 21 41 41 39 38 Male Female 63 2019 37 2019 2018 61 2018 39 18-34 35-54 55+ 2019 2018 Disability 7 6 Vehicle (%) type (%) Car 79 81 HGV/Truck 9 7 93 94 LCV 6 5 2019 2018 Coach Yes 5 5 No/prefer not to say Other 1 1 Q1.
    [Show full text]