DOCSLIB.ORG

Green File 8 30/3 TROY- MURRAY 1816-1817

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Green File 8 30/3 TROY- MURRAY 1816-1817 Green File 8 30/3 TROY- MURRAY 1816-1817 Green File 8, Murray-Troy; 1816-1817 1. (1816) A letter from Pope Pius VII to the Archbishops and bishops of Ireland, Drs Murray and Murphy presented him with a copy of the Resolutions passed by the Irish prelates at their meeting in August 1813. He is grieved and concerned at the manner in which Cardinal Litta's letter was received in Ireland, especially by the bishops. He argues that the concessions he made regarding the Veto simply followed on the lines laid down by his predecessors. The Irish bishops' fears are, he assures them, groundless; even should the London government do its worst the Veto, as he had proposed it, could not injure or destroy religion. Date: 1 Feb. 1816. Venerabiles Fratres salutem etc. 2. (1816) A copy of a letter signed by all the Irish prelates at their meeting in Kilkenny on 26 April 1816 at which the letter of his Holiness was read and discusssd. They regret that he still thinks the concessions he made unimportant. Their experience of English governments over three centuries make them, think otherwise, Ministers of that government are bound by oath, an oath which describes the Mass as idolatry, and derides other fundamentals of Catholic belief. The Pope has pointed out the benefits the Catholics received during the reign of the present king, but the granting of these reliefs was unavoidable as they were given from ulterior, political motives of security. Granting of the Veto meant that the British government will go further than demanding a say in the appointment of bishops; next they will want to dictate the appointment of parish clergy, awarding pensions to the loyal and nothing to others. The Irish bishops do not think that Emancipation itself should be won at such a price. Date; 28 April 1816 Quum in civitate etc. 3. (1816) A copy of a letter from Dr O’Reilly, Armagh, to Cardinal Litta. The nuns of the Dominican (Siena) Convent, Drogheda, wish to conform their institute to the rules of the Congregation of St Ursula, at Paris and to substitute the little Office of the B.V.M., for Divine Office in choir. Their request has the approval of the Irish prelates, also of the nuns' Dominican superiors in Ireland and Rome, Date: 17 July 1816. Supplici petitione B.P.F. etc. 4. (1816) (on same paper) A rescript from the Holy See to Dr O'Reilly granting the request of the Dominican nuns in Drogheda. Date: 8 September 1816. Ad humillimas preces etc. 5. (1816) A draft of a letter (in Dr Troy's hand) from Dr Bray to Cardinal Litta. Unfortunately for Dr Bray who is paralysed, Dr Everard, his coadjutor,has fallen ill and is unable to discharge his duties. Dr Everard has written home offering his resignation, Dr Bray recommends Fr Robert Laffan as coadjutor; he describes his qualities. Dr Troy will also testify to his worthiness. Date: August 1816. Infaustum nimis etc. 6. (1816) A draft of the Relatio Status of his diocese sent to Rome by Dr Troy. Date: 20 August 1816. Relatio Status Ecclesiae etc. 2. 7. (1816) A draft of a letter (in Dr Troy's hand) to Pope Pius VII. At a convention in Dublin the undersigned heard the Pontiff's letter to the Irish bishops read. While protesting their total obedience to the decision of His Holiness, they respectfully put forward their reasons for regarding the Veto as very dangerous (evidently a draft for the Catholic Committee.) Date: 1816. Convenientibus nobis infrascriptes etc. 6. (l8l6) A draft of a letter from Dr Troy to Sir Henry Parnell. Until he received Sir Henry's letter Dr Troy "did not think it possible that the parish of Rathdrum was totally destitute of any moral or religious instruction as far as Catholics are concerned." He explains why bible-reading is not encouraged among the unlettered, comments on proselytism by Methodists and gives his reasons for requiring the Douay version to be used in the archdiocese. Date: l816. I did not conceive etc. 9. (1816) A letter from Cardinal Litta to Dr Murray. He thanks Dr Murray for his letter and is glad to say that he is better in health. He apologises for the delay in replying and wishes he could write in English; he gave the bishops' letter to His Holiness who is much more satisfied with it than he was with their previous letter. The Cardinal agrees with Cardinal Consalvi who thinks that the Pope would not oppose the project that the Irish prelates have presented to Parliament but they wonder if the British government will be satisfied.(Domestic Nomination of Bishops had been suggested by the Irish bishops). Are the prelates and the diocesan clergy all agreed on the significance of that term? (D.M.) People little animated by true patriotism could profit by dissensions that might arise, so it was most important that the views of the Catholics should not be divergent. Date; 29 August 1816. Oblige de vous faire etc. 10. (1816) A first draft of Dr Murray's reply to Cardinal Litta. (cf. the preceding) He is glad that the Cardinal has recovered and had hoped to call on him when passing through Milan on his return journey from Rome but unforeseen circumstances meant that he could only send a letter. Dr Murphy and he (Dr Murray) presented the Pope's letter to the Irish prelates assembled in Kilkenny in April.' The bishops were deeply grateful to His Holiness but they cannot in conscience abstain from stating once more the affliction and terror they feel in contemplating the consequences which concession of the Veto will have. They have sent a duplicate answer to His Holiness through Cardinal Consalvi; they assure the Pope that their remarks do not stem from contumacy or disrespect but from their responsibility to God for their flocks. He describes their latest petition to both Houses of Parliament and begs the Holy Father to write confirming the portion of the Genoese letter which stated that nomination of Irish bishops should proceed as formerly. Date: Oct.28, 1816. I cannot sufficiently express etc 11. (1816) A copy of the final draft of the preceding in French. Same date. J'ai eu 1'honneur de etc. 12. (18l6) A letter from Mc Argenti, Rome, to Dr Murray. He thanks him for his letter. He has sent Dr Troy notification of all the new Cardinals, also of the new Irish prelates. If the letter did not arrive he will repeat it. He also sent information about Blessings etc; as no stable form has been as yet set, the Sign of the Gross suffices, He thanks Signor Blake for the two "examples" sent; if anything further is owning to him, Dr Troy is requested to pay it. They are very busy in Rome owing to an enormous increase in correspondence. Date: 13 April 1816. Gratissima e stata etc. 13. (1816) A letter from Mr Argenti to Dr Troy. He refers to earlier letters which he thinks have been delayed and lists their contents; if they have not been received he will send duplicates. He has sent Propaganda's reply to Dr Coppinger , Cloyne; Dr C. should have addressed his letter to Argenti in the first place; there would have been less danger of misunderstanding. He encloses a message for a Dominican friend. When the formula, for Blessings is fixed he will forward it. He encloses the list of Cardinals made at the Secret Consistory of 8 March; His Holiness created ten others in petto; he adds a long list of others appointed to papal offices. Date: 16 May 1816. Nella mia Lettera etc. 14. (1816) A letter from Fr Richard Hayes,O.F.M.,(representing the Catholics of Ireland in Rome; to Dr Murray and Dr Murphy, at Paris. He is sorry he missed seeing them before they left Rome. He received their letter; they have misinterpreted what he said, so he gives the correct version. They departed, leaving the matter of the Veto no better than at the time of the Genoese letter and they refused to bring back Cardinal Consalvi's letter, so insulting to the Irish prelates and people. He thinks they should have remained and protested; the Pope is upset at the ferment in Ireland; he has ordered Consalvi to write another, different reply; evidently His Holiness merely repeated the English king's declaration and did not regard his concession of the Veto as an ecclesiastical decision. After enlarging on this statement the writer charges Drs Murray and Murphy with coldness towards him; he intends to publish some of their correspondence in Irish papers and makes certain charges against the two prelates, but exculpates Dr Milner. He encloses a letter for Dr Long in Paris. Date: 17 January 1816. Your Lordships' reply etc. 15. (1816) A letter from Dr O'Reilly, Armagh, to Dr Murray. He is amazed at the attitude adopted by the Pope to the "humble and earnest petition of a whole people, bishops, clergy and laity". He has found it hard to bring himself to Christian submission; he fears the effect this will have on religion, but he is certain that Drs Murray and Murphy could not have done more than they did. He is sending copies of Dr Hurray's letter reporting on their mission to his Suffragans, also notice of the April meeting at Maynooth. Date: 28 March 1816. Before your obliging etc. 16. (1816) (Copied from the Thurles Archives;. A letter from Dr Murray to Dr Bray.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bishop Brendan Leahy
    th . World Day of Poor 19 November, 2017 No great economic success story possible as long as homelessness and other poverty crises deepen – Bishop Brendan Leahy Ireland cannot claim itself an economic success while it allows the neglect of its poor, Bishop of Limerick Brendan Leahy has stated in his letter to the people of the diocese to mark the first World Day of the Poor. The letter - read at Masses across the diocese for the official World Day of the Poor called by Pope Francis – says that with homelessness at an unprecedented state of crisis today in Ireland, it is almost unjust and unchristian to claim economic success. “Throughout the centuries we have great examples of outreach to the poor. The most outstanding example is that of Francis of Assisi, followed by many other holy men and women over the centuries. In Ireland we can think of great women such as Catherine McAuley and Nano Nagle. “Today the call to hear the cry of the poor reaches us. In our Diocese we are blessed to have the Limerick Social Services Council that responds in many ways. There are many other initiatives that reach out to the homeless, refugees, people in situations of marginalisation,” he wrote. “But none of us can leave it to be outsourced to others to do. Each of us has to do our part. Today many of us live a privileged life in the material sense compared to generations gone by, Today is Mission Sunday and the Holy Father invites all Catholics to contribute to a special needing pretty much nothing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Catholic Episcopal Corps, 1657 – 1829: a Prosopographical Analysis
    THE IRISH CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPS, 1657 – 1829: A PROSOPOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS VOLUME 1 OF 2 BY ERIC A. DERR THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF PHD DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY NATIONAL UNIVERISTY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH SUPERVISOR OF RESEARCH: DR. THOMAS O’CONNOR NOVEMBER 2013 Abstract This study explores, reconstructs and evaluates the social, political, educational and economic worlds of the Irish Catholic episcopal corps appointed between 1657 and 1829 by creating a prosopographical profile of this episcopal cohort. The central aim of this study is to reconstruct the profile of this episcopate to serve as a context to evaluate the ‘achievements’ of the four episcopal generations that emerged: 1657-1684; 1685- 1766; 1767-1800 and 1801-1829. The first generation of Irish bishops were largely influenced by the complex political and religious situation of Ireland following the Cromwellian wars and Interregnum. This episcopal cohort sought greater engagement with the restored Stuart Court while at the same time solidified their links with continental agencies. With the accession of James II (1685), a new generation of bishops emerged characterised by their loyalty to the Stuart Court and, following his exile and the enactment of new penal legislation, their ability to endure political and economic marginalisation. Through the creation of a prosopographical database, this study has nuanced and reconstructed the historical profile of the Jacobite episcopal corps and has shown that the Irish episcopate under the penal regime was not only relatively well-organised but was well-engaged in reforming the Irish church, albeit with limited resources. By the mid-eighteenth century, the post-Jacobite generation (1767-1800) emerged and were characterised by their re-organisation of the Irish Church, most notably the establishment of a domestic seminary system and the setting up and manning of a national parochial system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Catholic Episcopal Corps, 1657 – 1829: a Prosopographical Analysis
    THE IRISH CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPS, 1657 – 1829: A PROSOPOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS VOLUME 2 OF 2 BY ERIC A. DERR THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF PHD DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY NATIONAL UNIVERISTY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH SUPERVISOR OF RESEARCH: DR. THOMAS O’CONNOR NOVEMBER 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... i Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... ii Biographical Register ........................................................................................................ 1 A .................................................................................................................................... 1 B .................................................................................................................................... 2 C .................................................................................................................................. 18 D .................................................................................................................................. 29 E ................................................................................................................................... 42 F ................................................................................................................................... 43 G .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Dunraven Papers D/3196
    ----'" The Dunraven Papers D/3196 SUMMARY LIST UNIVERSITYafLIMERICK INTRODUCTION (D/3196) The Dunraven Papers comprise c.15, 150 documents and c.225 volumes, 1574 and 1614-1930s, deriving from the Wyndham-Quin family of Adare Manor, Adare, Co. Limerick, Earls of Dunraven. The original patronymic of the Earls of Dunraven was Quin. The Wyndham half of the double barrel derives from the Wyndham family of Dunraven Castle, Glamorganshire, and Clearwell Court, Gloucestershire, whose heiress the future 2nd Earl of Dunraven married in 1810. Thus, the title of Dunraven, though it is an Irish tipe and sounds straight out of Maria Edgeworth, is actually taken from a castle in Wales. This is the more inappropriate in view of the fact that the Quins are one of the few families in the whole peerage ofIreland which is of unbroken Gaelic descent in the male line. Their unbroken descent, however, is not matched by continuity of habitation. They did not come to rest in the one place, Adare, Co. Limerick, until (probably) the first half of the 17th century, although they had been living nearby, and in the same county, since (probably) the late 15th century. Presumably because their earlier history was unsettled and far from untroubled, their papers, disappointingly, go no further back than those of the average 'Ascendancy' family in Ireland - the group to which socially, though not ethnically, they belonged. The earliest document in the Dunraven archive is dated 1574, but it related to Middlesex. There is no concentration of material until the late 17th century; there is virtually no correspondence prior to 1800 ; and although other forms of estate material are fairly abundant, there are actually no rentals of earlier date than 1855.
    [Show full text]
  • The Visionary, the Liberator and the Bishop by Tom Donovan
    n 1815, Ireland's economy "the unaccountable conduct of Fr. was in a state of recession. McEniry, the Parish Priest of Glin'. He The Napoleonic Wars, stated that the priest "brought forward which had provided a much from the altar and supported by the might needed boom to the countrv, of his authority the visions of some account of events in Glin. In the report he had come to an end. During the course bf enthusiastic devotee who prophesises that said: the war, Ireland became known as the all the South of Ireland is very shortly to "Food Larder of Europe", as it provided become the scene of devastation and I spent the last month in the neigh- much needed food supplies to the British blood". Spring Rice went on to state that bourhood of Glin, where I found the Army. In addition to supplying food, he was not sure if the priest's intentions in minds of the lower order of the people Ireland also supplied thousands of soldiers "giving currency to these absurdities, greatly disturbed, in consequence of the who joined in the fight against Napoleon. were malicious or not". The danger, he exhortation of their priests and although In the aftermath of Napoleon's defeat at said, was "that in a country remote and they may appear trivial and foolish, Waterloo, the Irish soldiers who survived unimproved, important consequences several gentlemen of that neigh- returned home to a country in the throes could result in the prophesies when they bourhood conceive they may further the of depression, as demand and prices for were supported by popular prejudicesW.(l) views of the disaffected.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marian Year Jubilee
    The Marian Year Jubilee 1954 – 2004 Limerick’s contribution to a celebration of Faith Foreword The earliest apparition of the Blessed Virgin is said to be as early as 40 AD, probably before she died, to James the Apostle in Saragossa, Spain. There have been numerous apparitions since then, but the first in Ireland was on August 21st, 1879, in Knock, County Mayo. Margaret Beirne and thirteen others saw a beautiful woman, clothed in white gar- ments, wearing a large brilliant crown. County Mayo had suffered great distress in the 1870s. Partial famine, poverty and forced evictions had created another wave of Irish emigration. It was in this environment that the apparition occurred. The Church’s response to the apparition was typically circumspect. The Archbishop Most Rev. Dr. John MacHale set up a commission to gather testimonies of those claiming to see the apparition and then a record of purported cures was maintained until 1936. The Commission reported that their evidence was “trustworthy and satisfactory”. The Report was published in the newspapers and pilgrims began to travel from afar. One of the first organised pilgrimages to Knock Shrine came from Limerick. Further reports of cures to Limerick people strengthened the connection with Knock. On June 5th 1880 The Munster News reported the story of a woman from Shanagolden, County Limerick, “who arrived in Kilrush to take the steamer across the Shannon on her way home from Knock. Having lost her sight some years previously she had walked all the way to Knock with her young son and during her stay there, recovered her sight.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Review of Child Safeguarding Practice in the Diocese of Limerick Undertaken By
    Second Review of Child Safeguarding Practice in the Diocese of Limerick undertaken by The National Board for Safeguarding Children in the Catholic Church in Ireland (National Board) Date of Review Report: April 2020 Diocese of Limerick – April 2020 CONTENTS Page Background: …………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Introduction: ……………………………………………………………………………. 4 Standard 1: Creating and Maintaining Safe Environments: …………………………. 5 Standard 2: Responding to Reports: ………………………………………………….. 11 Standard 3: Care of Complainants: …………………………………………………… 14 Standard 4: Management of Respondents: …………………………………………… 15 Standard 5: Training: …………………………………………………………………. 17 Standard 6: Communications: ………………………………………………………… 19 Standard 7: Quality Assurance: ………………………………………………………. 20 Conclusion: …………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Page 2 of 21 Diocese of Limerick – April 2020 Background In 2016, Church authorities adopted Safeguarding Children - Policy and Standards for the Catholic Church in Ireland. In order to assess compliance against the Church’s standards, Bishop Brendan Leahy of Limerick invited the National Board to undertake a Review of practice in 2020. The diocese was previously reviewed in March 2012 under the Safeguarding Children - Standards and Guidance for the Catholic Church in Ireland 2008. The purpose of this second round of Reviews is to assess the practice against the Catholic Church in Ireland’s current standards, as detailed in Safeguarding Children - Policy and Standards for the Catholic Church in Ireland 2016 and make statements based on evidence, which provide: Public confidence that the Church body is safe for children; Affirmation to Child Safeguarding personnel that they are doing the right things well; Confirmation to the Church authority that what they want to be done is in fact being done; Independent verification of Self-Audit – or correction and/or improvement of Self-Audit; Opportunities for learning.
    [Show full text]
  • History Studies Volume 5
    History Studies University ofLimerick History Society Journal Volume 5 2004 Table of Contents Preface History Studies is a referred publication of the University Editorial!AcknowledgementIForeword 2 of Limerick History Society and is published annually. It Politics, policy and history; history teaching in Irish 3 is registered with the Irish International Standard Serial secondary schools 1922 - 70 Number (ISSN) Centre at the National Library of John O'Callaghan Ireland. The white woman's business: A look at the influence of 16 British women on the decolonisation process and their prominent role in British imperial history Cover design by Jennifer McCaffrey and Nora Deirdra McCracken McGillicuddy, Limerick School of Art and Design, Limerick Institute ofTechnology. Ne""town Pery - the antithesis to Corporation corruption 28 and the birth ofa new city in eighteenth century Limerick The cover incorporates the concept of past, present and Jennljer Afoore future, which is depicted, firstly by the use of the 'A very brisk month ofcanvassing and caucusing' 50 Buddhist symbol Aum. The idea is secondly represented Episcopal appointments in the diocese ofLimerick by three illustrative heads looking in different directions. 1825- 1917 They symbolise the search for history by past, present Mal/hew Tobin and future historians. A history ofseafood in Irish cuisine and culture 61 Mdirtln Mac Con lomaire Copyright © by the contributors listed herein and History Internment, the IRA and the Lawless Case 77 Studies, 2004, including all bibliographical references. in Ireland 1957 - 61 John Maguire No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in Conquered lands: The manifestation ofMacNamaras' 101 a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any Clare cI250 - c 1500 means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording Larna Maloney or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Notes on contributors 116 University ofLimerick History Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 Introduction to Investigation of the 46 Priests
    Chapter 11 Introduction to investigation of the 46 priests Selecting the representative sample 11.1 The Commission received information about complaints, suspicions or knowledge of child sexual abuse in respect of 172 named priests and 11 unnamed priests. (Some or all of the 11 unnamed priests may, of course, be included in the 172 named priests.) After a preliminary examination, the Commission concluded that 102 of these priests were within remit. Of those priests who were not within the Commission‟s terms of reference, two main reasons for their exclusion were identified: the complaint was made outside the time period 1975 – 2004; the priest was not operating under the aegis of the Archdiocese of Dublin at the time of the alleged abuse. The priests in question here were mainly priests belonging to religious orders and societies who were working in Dublin but not on behalf of the Archdiocese. 11.2 The Commission decided that the only realistic way in which it could select and report on a representative sample of those complaints and suspicions was to select a representative sample of the priests concerned. Otherwise, the Commission may have had to investigate every priest within remit. The representative sample was chosen from the group of 102 priests who were within remit. The Commission took the view that it was impractical to make two separate samples for those against whom complaints were made and those about whom there were suspicions or concerns. Almost invariably, there were suspicions or concerns expressed about those against whom complaints were made. There was a very small number of priests about whom suspicions or concerns were expressed but about whom no actual complaints were made.
    [Show full text]
  • United Irish League, and M.P
    From: Redmond Enterprise Ronnie Redmond To: FOMC-Regs-Comments Subject: Emailing redmond.pdf Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 2:44:55 PM Attachments: redmond.pdf NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL I want this cause im a Redmond and i want to purchase all undeveloped and the government buildings the Queen of England even if i have to use PROBATES LAW RONNIE JAMES REDMOND Leabharlann Náisiúnta na hÉireann National Library of Ireland Collection List No. 118 PAPERS OF JOHN REDMOND MSS 3,667; 9,025-9,033; 15,164-15,280; 15,519-15,521; 15,523-15,524; 22,183- 22,189; 18,290-18,292 (Accessions 1154 and 2897) A collection of the correspondence and political papers of John Redmond (1856-1918). Compiled by Dr Brian Kirby holder of the Studentship in Irish History provided by the National Library of Ireland in association with the National Committee for History. 2005-2006. The Redmond Papers:...........................................................................................5 I Introduction..........................................................................................................5 I.i Scope and content: .....................................................................................................................5 I.ii Biographical history: .................................................................................................................5 I.iii Provenance and extent: .........................................................................................................7 I.iv Arrangement and structure: ..................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • P34 Christian Brothers Schools Limerick
    P34 P34 Christian Brothers Schools Limerick Copyright Limerick Archives i P34 Contents Introduction 1 A School Registers (1856-1925) (i) St. Michaels Parish School (1856-1886) 2 (ii) Cecil Street Rooms (1856-1884) 2 (iii) Northumberland Rooms, St. Michael’s Lane (1856-1887) 2 (iv) St. Munchins, Thomondgate School, (1883-1925) 3 (v) Sexton Street (1883-1923) 3 (vi)Additional Register (1856-1886) 4 (vii)General Admissions Registers (1890-1915) 4 B Examination Results (1899-1920) 5 C Financial Records(1885-1893) 5 D Newspaper Cuttings (1886-1898) 5 Copyright Limerick Archives ii P34 Introduction This collection consists of a small number of school registers and other records relating to Christian Brothers Schools in Limerick. These records were deposited with Limerick Archives in 2002. The Christian Brothers first came to Limerick in June 1816 at the bequest of the Roman Catholic Bishop of Limerick, Reverend Dr. Charles Tuohy. In September 1816, the Brothers commenced teaching in the Assembly Rooms, Charlotte Quay in September 1816. In November 1821, the Christian Brothers purchased the Lancastrian School in Clare Street (St. Michael’s parish), which remained in their possession until 1888. In 1824, they had to vacate the Assembly Room premises but with the help of Bishop Tuohy they were able to open a temporary a school in the grounds of the diocesan college, Corbally. On 1 September 1825 a half-acre of ground at Sexton Street was rented from Mr. Samuel Dixon and the building of a new school and monastery was completed on 20th May 1829. It was opened for admission of boys on 16 June 1829 and 408 attended.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Pastoral Unit Abbeyfeale, Athea, Templeglantine, Tournafulla, Mountcollins
    PARISH PASTORAL UNIT ABBEYFEALE, ATHEA, TEMPLEGLANTINE, TOURNAFULLA, MOUNTCOLLINS 5th Sept 2021 www.abbeyfealeparish.ie email [email protected] Church Sacristy 068 - 51915 Parish Office 068 - 31133 Death of Fr Joe Foley Season of Creation 1st September to 4th of October Feast of St Francis of Assisi Fr Joe Foley, who ministered in the parish of Abbeyfeale The Season of Creation is marked throughout the Christian world from 1 September to 4 October (Feast of Saint Francis of Assisi) and celebrates the joy of creation as well as from Dec 2013 to February 2017 died on Friday 20th of encouraging awareness-raising initiatives to protect the natural environment. Pope Francis established the 1 September as an annual World Day of Prayer for the Care of Creation. August following a short illness. The theme for the Season of Creation 2021 is ‘Restoring Our Common Home’. During this season we are asked to join together to celebrate creation and protect our common home We extend our deepest sympathy to his mother, twin sister, through prayer, reflection and action. The global Christian family is called to awaken to the urgent need to heal our relationships with creation and with each other and to encourage our brothers and all his extended family. Fr Joe was laid to rest parish communities to do the same, “for we know that things can change!” (Laudato Si’, 13). in his native parish of Effin, Co. Limerick. This year we celebrate this season mindful of the fact that our world continues to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic as well as a devastating climate and biodiversity crisis.
    [Show full text]