Death Notices County Wexford Rip Ie
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Icisp Summer Study Abroad Program
ICISP SUMMER STUDY ABROAD PROGRAM Completion of at least 12 hours of college-level Summer Study Abroad in Carlow, Ireland coursework; completion of Freshman English Composition or Summer 2020 dates: its equivalent with a B or better; June 2 – June 30, 2020 a cumulative college earned grade point (subject to slight change) average of 2.75/4.0 or higher; and approval and recommendation of their campus ICISP representative. Program Summary A personal interview with the program coordinator The Illinois Consortium for International Studies may be held to determine the participant’s and Programs (ICISP) is pleased to provide a four maturity and adaptability to a foreign environment. week summer study abroad program to Carlow Successful completion of the application process is College, Carlow, Ireland. The program dates for required for admission to the program. If a summer 2020 are June 2 – June 30, 2020. participant has special needs, the program will attempt to make reasonable accommodations Carlow, Ireland, affectionately known as within the capacity available at Carlow College. Carlowtown, is the quintessential Irish country Disability accommodations will vary according to town. With a population of 25,000, Carlow is home need and what can reasonably be provided by a to two colleges including Carlow College, known to foreign institution. It may be difficult for those with locals as St. Patrick’s College. Learn more about severe physical disabilities to travel to and within Carlow College at www.carlowcollege.ie and about Ireland. Carlow-town at www.carlowtourism.com. Dublin is about an hour away and is easily accessible by both train and bus. -
FAMILY CARE Once the Occurrence of an Incident/Accident Has Been Verified and There Is Positive Confirmation of the Crewmembers
FAMILY CARE Once the occurrence of an incident/accident has been verified and there is positive confirmation of the crewmembers involved, the next of kin/emergency contacts must be notified. Due to vacations, illness, etc., it may be necessary for any of the members of the management team to be involved in the injury/death notification along with the employee designated individuals (listed in the next of kin/emergency contact form). Some things to consider involving family notification include: • Always use more than one individual, i.e., program director, chaplain, other team members along with the employee designated individual who is found on the next of kin/emergency notification form. • Determine who your notification team is going to be prior to an accident. Have back-ups. • Who should be notified? Spouse? Parents? Siblings? In-laws? Children? This should be on the next of kin notification form. • Be cognizant of the diversity of family dynamics in this situation. • Where will the notification occur? Home, work, out of state? • Be prepared for delays. • In the case of serious injuries, the most important concern is getting the family to the employee. • A Family Liaison Officer (described below) should be assigned to each injured or deceased crewmember family. • The family should learn of the injury or death before the media. Sometimes this is not possible due to the widespread use of smart phones and social media. Whenever possible, tell the family in person. • If done via the phone, the notification team should meet with the family as soon as possible. If possible, use local law enforcement personnel to physically go to the home to be present for the notification if your agency is unable due to geographical distance or urgency due to media involvement. -
1234 Supplement to the London Gazette, February 27, 1875
1234 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, FEBRUARY 27, 1875. NAME. RESIDENCE. OCCUPATION. Shelley, Thomas, and Callan, county Kilkenny Draper Corcoran, Mrs. Mary Ballywalter, county Kilkenny Shelly, T. H. Care of A. D. Kennedy, .67, Upper Sack- ville-street, Dublin Sheppard, Mrs. Bithia Oakley, Rathangan, county Kildare Sheppard, James 2, Johnston-place, Dublin Provision Dealer Sheridan, Joseph Castlebar Sheridan, M. J., and Oulart, county Wexford M.D. Sheridan, Rev. P. C. -Bannow, New Ross, county Woxford C.C. Sherin, Michael Mill-street, Cork Clerk of Petty Session 8 Sherlock, Edward 15, Northumberland-avenue, Kingstown Sherlock, John 20, Upper Gloucester-street, Dublin Sherlock, Thomas P. Carrigmoorna, county Waterford Shiel, John Kilbegnet House, Creggs, county Ros- common Smyth, Henry Hcllywell, Roscommon J.P. Shipman, Edward 38, Wilson-street, Finsbury, London Shiell, Mrs. Georgina Clonmel Short, Miss Mary 4, Harcourt-street, Dublin Shortall, Mrs. Anastasia . Cloonmanta, Kilkenny Simms, Mrs. Bridget, and 15, Sydney-placo, Cork Fitzgibbon, Mrs. Mary Clonmel Shuldham, M. P. Speen Hill, Newbury, Berks Shuldham, John Moigh House, Ballymahon, county Longford Simm, William George, and 217, Camden-road, N.W. Louisa, his wife Sikes, Miss A. E. North Strand, Limerick Sikes, Miss Mary North Strand, Limerick Simms, Mrs. Bridget 15, Sydney-place, Cork Sims, George 150, Aldersgate-street, London Sikes, Francis George-street, Limerick Sinnott, Miss Christina, Rowe-street, Wexford Lambert, Rev. Walter, and The Manse, Wexford Reville, Rev. Clement Wexford Sinnott, James, and Waterloo-road, Dublin Solicitor Maria, his wife Sinnott, Rev. John Ballygarrett, Clonevan, Gorey, county Wexford Sinnott, Michael, and Ballybeg Ferns, county Wexford Ellen, his wife Sinnott, Michael, Ballybeg Ferns, county Wexford Kennedy, Margaret Ballyduff, Camolin, county Wexford Sinnott, Mary, Doyle, Catherine, Presentation Convent, Wexford Roche,* Julia Sinnott, Miss Margaret Dacumshane, county Wexford Sinnott, Miss Julia, and Sinnott, Rev. -
A STUDY of the EFFECTIVENESS of a DEATH NOTIFICATION TRAINING SEMINAR for LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS by Brandon Jeremy Register
A STUDY OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A DEATH NOTIFICATION TRAINING SEMINAR FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS by Brandon Jeremy Register (Under the direction of Alan E. Stewart) ABSTRACT This study evaluated the effectiveness of a death notification training seminar for law enforcement officers developed by Alan Stewart and Janice Harris Lord. Previous research has demonstrated that a significant portion of law enforcement officers have received little to no death notification training, yet the majority of officers have delivered at least one death notification (Stewart et al., 2000). Participants (N=307) were a mix of law enforcement officers (n=163), chaplains (n=25), victim advocates (n=32), and nine other categories of law enforcement personnel (n=87) across five states in the United States. Results of pre and post measures indicated that the seminar was viewed to be effective overall; that it enhanced the death notification skills of participants; that it increased their confidence in performing a compassionate and thorough death notification; and that participants generally felt prepared to handle circumstances which commonly surround death notification after attending the seminar. Differences in reported death notification experiences were analyzed by gender and professional identification. Males reported performing significantly more death notifications than females, and significant differences were found between Officers, Chaplains, and Victim Advocates on several measures of emotional response during death notifications. Implications are -
196297-JNLR Methodology Report
JNLR Methodology Report Contents 1. JNLR - Joint National Listenership Research ................................................................................................ 1 2. JNLR - Joint National Listenership Research Committee ............................................................................. 1 3. JNLR Survey Objective .................................................................................................................................... 2 4. JNLR Reports ................................................................................................................................................... 2 5. Data Formats .................................................................................................................................................... 3 6. Analyses For Publication Or For Promotional Purposes .............................................................................. 3 7. Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 7.1. Interviewing .......................................................................................................................................... 4 7.2. Universe Estimates .............................................................................................................................. 4 8. Sampling .......................................................................................................................................................... -
Federal Register/Vol. 66, No. 128/Tuesday, July 3, 2001
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 3, 2001 / Proposed Rules 35209 B. Upland Game Hunting. We allow 1. At Long Island you must possess a valid time. We allow taking rough fish by bow and hunting of pheasant, quail, and partridge on refuge permit and report game taken, as arrow or spear only along the refuge designated areas on the Wahluke Unit of the specified with the permit. boundary in the backwaters of the Monument/Refuge in accordance with State 2. At Long Island we allow only archery Trempealeau River, in accordance with State regulations and subject to the conditions hunting and prohibit firearms. regulations. listed below: 3. At Bear River we do not allow bear * * * * * 1. You may possess only approved hunting. nontoxic shot while on the refuge. 4. We prohibit dogs. 34. In § 32.72 Guam by revising 2. We allow only shotguns and archery * * * * * paragraph D. of Guam National Wildlife Refuge to read as follows: hunting. 33. In § 32.69 Wisconsin by: 3. We allow access from 2 hours before a. Revising paragraph C.1. of Fox sunrise to 2 hours after sunset. We prohibit § 32.72 Guam. River National Wildlife Refuge; * * * * * overnight camping and/or parking. b. Revising paragraph D. of Horicon C. Big Game Hunting. We allow hunting of Guam National Wildlife Refuge deer on the Wahluke Unit of the Monument/ National Wildlife Refuge; Refuge in accordance with State regulations c. Revising paragraphs A. and B. of St. * * * * * and subject to the following conditions: Croix Wetland Management District; D. Sport Fishing. Anglers may fish and 1. -
Stakeholder Consultation for 2018 BAI Review of Ownership and Control Policy
Stakeholder Consultation for 2018 BAI Review of Ownership and Control Policy Dr. Roddy Flynn Associate Professor School of Communications Dublin City University July 2018 1 Contents Page Number 3 1. Introduction 5 2. Methodology 6 3. Presentation 7 4. Opening Remarks 10 5. Policy Provisions 5.1 Policy Objectives 10 5.2 Policy Details – (A) Interpretation 13 of Terms 5.3 Policy Details – (B) Character, 17 Expertise and Experience 5.4 Policy Details – (C) Financial 20 Resources etc. 5.5 Policy Details - (D) An undue 22 number of sound broadcasting services 5.6 Policy Details - (E) An undue 29 number of sound broadcasting services in a specified area 5.7 Policy Details - (F) An undue 32 number of communications media in a specified area 5.8 Policy Details – (G) Assignment of 36 Contracts 5.9 Policy Details – (H) Programming 38 5.10 Policy Details – (I) Competition Act 40 2002 and (J) Non-EU entities 6. Summary of 41 responses/proposals Appendix 1 - List of Respondents to the 44 Targeted Consultation 2 1. Introduction Section 25 of the 2009 Broadcasting Act provides for the BAI to perform a regulatory role with regard to the ownership and control of media institutions in Ireland. In addition to ensuring “the provision of open and pluralistic broadcasting services” in Ireland, the section requires the Authority to “promote diversity in control of the more influential commercial and community broadcasting services”. Part 6 of the 2009 Act also requires that the BAI’s Contract Awards Committee should have regard to the ownership and control of applicants when assessing applications for the award of broadcasting contracts. -
Witnessing the Resurrection: Planning and Preparing for End of Life
Witnessing the Resurrection: Planning and Preparing for End of Life Provided by Westminster Presbyterian Church, Greenville, South Carolina in consultation with The Book of Common Worship (2018, Westminster John Knox Press) 1 “In life and in death we belong to God.” A Brief Statement of Faith, 1.1 “In the face of death, we affirm with tears and joy the good news of the gospel and the hope of the resurrection. We do not grieve in isolation, but are sustained by the power of the Holy Spirit and the community of faith.” The Directory for Worship, W-4.0701 This book is intended for members of Westminster Church who wish to aid in the planning of their own funeral, whether in the Westminster sanctuary or the Colum- barium and Memorial Garden. Please note below whom the book belongs to, the date of its preparation, and any with whom the service has been planned. 2 A Note from the Pastoral Staff It is our greatest hope that this booklet will be a gift to you and those you love. Whether sudden or expected, the end of life comes as a time of mourning for the saints on earth, and while we know that God holds us in our mourning and sustains us with divine love, planning for end-of- life can provide some relief in times of grief. Indeed, this booklet is intended to guide you through the planning of a funeral service and orient you and those you love to the church’s theol- ogy and proclamation. God’s presence in life and death is the surest af- firmation of the church. -
Boley-Kilmichael Gold Project County Wexford, IRELAND
Boley-Kilmichael Gold Project County Wexford, IRELAND IMC Exploration Group plc 70 Ballybough Road, Ballybough, Dublin 3, Ireland ISDX: IMCP / PLU: IMCP Project Overview • Shear-hosted gold target • Bonanza grade gold discovered during drilling at Boley: 1.5 m grading 354 g/t within a 13.5 m interval averaging 3.5 g/t Au (applying 20 g/t top cut). Further significant grade intersections including [email protected] g/t Au. DDH 12-2551-04 - Boley SAMPLE No. Interval (m) Length(m) Au (ppm) Repeat Au(ppm) As (ppm) R00128 10.00 - 11.50 1.50 2.32 329 16623 11.50 - 13.00 1.50 >100 354 1145 R00129 13.00 - 14.50 1.50 1.13 143 R00130 14.50 - 16.00 1.50 0.07 22 R00124 16.00 - 18.50 2.50 0.11 72 R00131 18.50 - 19.00 0.50 6.16 2480 R00132 19.00 - 20.50 1.50 2.97 1090 R00133 20.50 - 23.50 3.00 1.34 1080 • Large area of untested ground – potential for significant new discoveries • Lack of systematic exploration in area ISDX: IMCP / PLU: IMCP 2 Project Location ISDX: IMCP / PLU: IMCP 3 Historic Exploration • PL2551 previously held by Irish Base Metals, Riofinex, Minco, Irish Marine Oil, Aquitaine Mining and Midas Mineral Resources • Numerous bedrock and float gold occurrences, up to 935 g/t Au identified • Exploration carried out primarily in the Ballyowen- Ballygarrett and Kilmichael areas • Notable drill intercepts of 0.72m@10 g/t, [email protected] g/t and [email protected] g/t Au • Limited follow-up work ISDX: IMCP / PLU: IMCP 4 Historic Exploration Company Year Work Carried Out Notable Results Area of Interest Irish Base Metals 1964-1966 Prospecting, shallow soils Pb, Zn and Cu anomalies identified in the areas of Ballyowen- sampling Ballyowen-Ballygarrett and Kilmichael Ballygarrett, Kilmichael Texasgulf Ireland Ltd. -
Business Case for the Wexford-Waterford Rail Link
BUSINESS CASE FOR THE WEXFORD-WATERFORD RAIL LINK Prepared by: South East on Track www.southeastontrack.com [email protected] @seonttrack @ 2 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION _______________________________________________________________ 4 1.1. Executive Summary: _________________________________________________________________ 4 1.2. The Basics ___________________________________________________________________________ 6 1.3. Background _________________________________________________________________________ 7 1.4. The Current Context _________________________________________________________________ 7 1.5. Why now? __________________________________________________________________________ 8 1.6. South East on Track __________________________________________________________________ 8 1.7. A Note on Nomenclature ____________________________________________________________ 9 2. CHARACTERISING THE RAIL LINK ______________________________________________ 10 2.1. Introduction ________________________________________________________________________ 10 2.2. Physical Description ________________________________________________________________ 10 2.3. Social Profile & Demographics ______________________________________________________ 12 2.4. European & International Policy Context _____________________________________________ 12 2.5. National Policy _____________________________________________________________________ 13 2.6. Local Government & Regional Policy ________________________________________________ 13 3. PASSENGER DEMAND ________________________________________________________ -
JNLR Methodology Report Apr'18 1
JNLR Methodology Repor Contents 1. JNLR - Joint National Listenership Research ................................................................................................ 1 2. JNLR - Joint National Listenership Research Committee ............................................................................. 1 3. JNLR Survey Objective .................................................................................................................................... 2 4. JNLR Reports ................................................................................................................................................... 2 5. Data Formats .................................................................................................................................................... 3 6. Analyses For Publication Or For Promotional Purposes .............................................................................. 3 7. Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 7.1. Interviewing .......................................................................................................................................... 4 7.2. Universe Estimates .............................................................................................................................. 4 8. Sampling .......................................................................................................................................................... -
2019 BLM Loss of Human Life Handbook
Form 1221-2 (June 1969) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Release BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 1-1795 Date MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET 2/27/2019 Subject H-1112-3, Loss of Human Life Handbook 1. Explanation of Material Transmitted: This handbook has been developed for ongoing agency use in response to the loss of human life. It will be continuously revised and updated based on current needs, policy, and procedures. 2. Reports Required: BLM personnel are required to follow BLM Serious Accident Investigation (SAI) reporting procedures. 3. Material Superseded: None. 4. Filing Instructions: File as directed below. REMOVE INSERT None All or Rel. No. 1-1795 (Total: 160 Pages) S:// Brian C. Steed Brian C. Steed Deputy Director, Policy and Programs Exercising the Authority of the Director H-1112-3 LOSS OF HUMAN LIFE HANDBOOK I-1 1 H-1112-3 LOSS OF HUMAN LIFE HANDBOOK I-1 Table of Contents CHAPTER I. INTRODCUTION .......................................................................................................................... I-1 CHAPTER II. AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................................... II-1 A. Public Law 103-332 Section 312 – Reimbursement ................................................................................ II-1 B. Public Law 104-208 Section 651 – Death Gratuity .................................................................................. II-1 C. 31 U.S.C. Section 1345 – Use Of Appropriated Funds ...........................................................................