DOCSLIB.ORG

1 in the Court of Mcoc Special Judge at Greater Bombay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 { Received on : 03/12/2011 { Registered on : 14/12/2011 MCOC SPECIAL CASE NO.19/2011 { { Decided on : 02/05/2018 { Duration : 6 5 0 { Years Months Days { Received on : 21/02/2012 { Registered on : 01/03/2012 MCOC SPECIAL CASE NO.07/2012 { { Decided on : 02/05/2018 { Duration : 6 2 11 { Years Months Days { Received on : 05/08/2016 { Registered on : 06/08/2016 MCOC SPECIAL CASE NO.15/2016 { { Decided on : 02/05/2018 { Duration : 1 8 27 { Years Months Days IN THE COURT OF MCOC SPECIAL JUDGE AT GREATER BOMBAY (Exclusive Special Court constituted for the cases under MCOCA/TADA/POTA AND OTHER SESSIONS CASES against the accused-Rajendra Sadashiv Nikalje @ Chhota Rajan) MCOC SPECIAL CASE NO.19 OF 2011 ALONG WITH MCOC SPECIAL CASE NO.07 OF 2012 ALONG WITH MCOC SPECIAL CASE NO.15 OF 2016 (CNR NO. MHCC02-010849-2011) The Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi (RC1 (S)-2016/SCU.V /SC-II / CBI /New Delhi), [Earlier, the State of Maharashtra, at the instance of Inspector of Police, DCB CID, Mumbai, C.R.No.57/2011, Powai Police Station C.R. No.256/2011] .... Prosecution Versus Rohee Tangappan Joseph @ Rohi @ Satish Kalya @ Sir and 10 ors. .... Accused 2 I N D E X SR.NO. TOPIC PAGE 1 Prosecution case. 10 2 Points for determination. 21 3 Details of the witnesses examined on behalf of 23 the prosecution. 4 Details of the important documents relied upon 41 by the prosecution. 5 Details of the documents relied upon by the 53 Defence. 6 Discussion regarding point no.1 (Homicidal 53 death). 6-A Objections regarding the recovery of the lead 67 (Article-247) from the body of J.Dey. 7 Discussion regarding point nos.2 & 3 (Conspiracy 72 & murder). 7-A Events which took place after the receipt of 73 information of the incident and objections raised by the defence about the registration of the FIR, spot of the incident and the finding of the lead near the spot of the incident, etc. 7-B Objections regarding the arrest of the accused 116 no.1-Rohee Tangappan Joseph @ Satish Kalya, accused no.2-Anil Waghmode & accused no.3- Abhijit Shinde. 7-C Objections regarding the arrest of the accused 129 no.4-Nilesh Shedge. 7-D Objections regarding the arrest of the accused 131 no.5-Arun Dake, accused no.6-Mangesh Aagvane & accused no.7-Sachin Gaikwad. 7-E Objections regarding the arrest of the accused 137 no.9-Deepak Sisodiya. 7-F Objections regarding the arrest of the accused 138 no.10-Paulson Palitara. 3 7-G Objections regarding the arrest/taking into 141 custody of the accused no.11-Ms.Jigna Vora & accused no.12-Chhota Rajan. 8 Consideration and analysis of the evidence. 9 Law relating to criminal conspiracy. 142 10 Concept of reasonable doubt and benefit of 153 doubt. 11 Roles attributed to each of the accused person. 158 12 Antecedents of the accused persons. 162 13 Confession made by the accused no.5-Arun Dake. 13-A Gist of the confession made by the accused no.5- 168 Arun Dake. 13-B Assessment of the statements made by the 173 accused no.5-Arun Dake. 13-C Evidence regarding voluntary nature & 176 truthfulness of the confession made by the accused no.5-Arun Dake. 13-D Analysis of the above evidence. 196 13-E Retraction of the confession made by the accused 237 no.5-Arun Dake. 14 Confession made by the accused no.9-Deepak Sisodiya. 14-A Gist of confession made by the accused no.9- 241 Deepak Sisodiya. 14-B Assessment of the statements made by the 246 accused no.9-Deepak Sisodiya. 14-C Evidence regarding the voluntary nature and 247 truthfulness of the confession made by the accused no.9-Deepak Sisodiya. 14-D Analysis of the above evidence. 272 14-E Retraction of the confession made by the accused 289 no.9-Deepak Sisodiya. 15 Confession made by the accused no.10- Paulson Palitara. 4 15-A Gist of confession made by the accused no.10- 292 Paulson Palitara. 15-B Assessment of the statements made by the 295 accused no.10-Paulson Palitara. 16 Extra-judicial confessions made by the accused no.12-Chhota Rajan. 16-A Evidence regarding the various extra-judicial 298 confessions made by the accused no.12-Chhota Rajan. 16-B Analysis of the above evidence. 327 17 Evidence regarding recovery of various mobile 360 phones, SIM cards and other articles during the personal search of the accused persons and recovery of the revolver, cartridges, empties, motorcycles and the Qualis vehicle on the basis of the disclosure statements made by some of the accused persons. 17-A Evidence in the form of CA/Ballistic reports. 369 17-B Evidence in the form of Call Detail Records and 370 use of mobile numbers by the accused persons. 17-C Evidence in the form of CCTV footage. 382 17-D Evidence regarding interception of the phone call 384 made by the accused no.12-Chhota Rajan to PW.90-Manoj Shivdasani. 17-E Evidence regarding report of the voice analysis of 399 the voice sample of the accused no.12-Chhota Rajan. 17-F Evidence regarding visit of J.Dey to London and 401 Philippines. 17-G Evidence regarding visit of J.Dey to the Uma 406 Palace Bar and Restaurant on 07/06/2011. 17-H Evidence of witness who heard the sound of 411 firing. 18 Objections regarding seizure of articles from the person of the accused at the time of their arrest. 5 18-A Objections regarding seizure from the accused 412 no.1-Rohee Tangappan Joseph @ Satish Kalya. 18-B Objections regarding seizure from the accused 419 no.2-Anil Waghmode. 18-C Objections regarding seizure from the accused 420 no.4-Nilesh Shedge. 18-D Objections regarding seizure from the accused 421 nos.5,6 & 7. 18-E Objections regarding recovery of the I-Phones 429 and I-Pad from the accused no.12-Chhota Rajan and the data retrieved from the I-Phone (Article- 291). 19 Objections regarding recoveries made from the accused persons in view of their disclosure statement. 19-A Objections regarding recovery of the revolver, 437 cartridges and empties from the accused no.1- Rohee Tangappan Joseph @ Satish Kalya. 19-B Objections regarding recovery of the Qualis 472 vehicle (Article-236) at the instance of the accused no.2-Anil Waghmode. 19-C Objections regarding recovery of the motorcycle 479 (Article-261) and rain-coat (Article-254) at the instance of the accused no.4-Nilesh Shedge. 19-D Objections regarding recovery of the motorcycle 489 (Article-240) at the instance of the accused no.6- Mangesh Aagvane. 19-E Objections regarding recovery of the motorcycle 498 (Article-233) at the instance of the accused no.7- Sachin Gaikwad. 19-F Objections regarding recovery of the mobile 507 phone (article-228) and Global roaming SIM card (Article-229) at the instance of the accused no.10-Paulson Palitara. 20 Objections regarding interception of the phone 507 call made by the accused no.12-Chhota Rajan to PW.90-Manoj Shivdasani. 6 21 Objections regarding the CDRs and use of some 508 of the mobile numbers by the accused persons. 22 Analysis of the corroborative evidence. 22-A Analysis of the corroborative evidence with 525 respect to the confession made by the accused no.5-Arun Dake. 22-B Analysis of the corroborative evidence with 536 respect to the various extra-judicial confessions made by the accused no.12-Chhota Rajan. 22-C Analysis of the other corroborative evidence. 540 23 Other submissions made by the Defence. 542 24 Discussion regarding point nos.4 & 5 (Offences 554 under the Arms Act,1959). 25 Discussion regarding point no.6 (Offence under 558 the Bombay Police Act,1951). 26 Discussion regarding point nos.7 to 9 (Offences 561 under the MCOC Act,1999). 27 Discussion regarding point no.10 (Offence 588 u/s.201 of the IPC). 28 Hearing on the point of sentence. 589 29 Operative part of the judgment. 592 (S.S. ADKAR) Date : 02/05/2018 Exclusive Special Court constituted for the cases under MCOCA/TADA/POTA AND OTHER SESSIONS CASES Place : Mumbai against the accused-Rajendra Sadashiv Nikalje @ Chhota Rajan 7 Exh-1714 IN THE COURT OF MCOC SPECIAL JUDGE AT GREATER BOMBAY (Exclusive Special Court constituted for the cases under MCOCA/TADA/POTA AND OTHER SESSIONS CASES against the accused-Rajendra Sadashiv Nikalje @ Chhota Rajan) MCOC SPECIAL CASE NO.19 OF 2011 ALONG WITH MCOC SPECIAL CASE NO.07 OF 2012 ALONG WITH MCOC SPECIAL CASE NO.15 OF 2016 (CNR NO. MHCC02-010849-2011) The Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi (RC1 (S)-2016/SCU.V /SC-II / CBI /New Delhi), [Earlier, the State of Maharashtra, at the instance of Inspector of Police, DCB CID, Mumbai, C.R.No.57/2011, Powai Police Station C.R. No.256/2011] .... Prosecution Versus 1) Rohee Tangappan Joseph @ Rohi @ Satish Kalya @ Sir, age: 42 years, occupation: Painter, r/o. Nityanand Chawl, Jawahar Nagar, Golibar Road, Khar (E), Mumbai (presently lodged at Mumbai Central Prison). 2) Anil Bhanudas Waghmode, age: 44 years, occupation: Transport Business, r/o. Amboli Naka, Bhendivali Chawl, Chawl no.313, Andheri (West), Mumbai-400 058 (presently lodged at Mumbai Central Prison). 3) Abhijit Kashinath Shinde, age: 32 years, occupation: Nil, r/o. Sion Laxmibaug Kadarbhai Chawl, Room No.105, Mumbai (presently lodged at Mumbai Central Prison). 8 4) Nilesh Narayan Shedge @ Bablu, age: 40 years, occupation: Vegetable vendor and the property broker, r/o.
Recommended publications
  • Indian History

    Indian History

    Indian History Ancient History 1.Which of the following ancient Indian Kings had appointed Dhamma Mahamattas? [A] Asoka [B] Chandragupta Maurya [C] Kanishka [D] Chandragupta-II Correct Answer: A [Asoka] ​ Notes: Dhamma Mahamattas were special officers appointed by Ashoka to spread the message of Dhamma or his Dharma. The Dhamma Mahamattas were required to look after the welfare of the people of different religions and to enforce the rules regarding the sanctity of animal life. 2.Who was the first Saka king in India? [A] Moga [B] Rudradaman [C] Azes [D] Ghatotkacha Correct Answer: A [ Moga ] ​ Notes: An Indo-Scythian king, Moga (or Maues) was the first Saka king in India who established Saka power in Gandhara and extended supremacy over north-western India. 3.Who was ‘Kanthaka’ in the context of Gautam Buddha? [A] Charioteer [B] Body-guard [C] Cousin [D] Horse Correct Answer: D [ Horse ] ​ Notes: Kanthaka was the royal horse of Gautama Buddha. 4.What symbol represents birth of Gautama Buddha? [A] Bodh tree [B] Lotus [C] Horse [D] Wheel Correct Answer: B [ Lotus ] ​ Notes: Lotus and bull resembles the symbol of birth of Gautama Buddha. 5.What symbol represents nirvana of Gautama Buddha? [A] Lotus [B] Wheel [C] Horse [D] Bodhi Tree Correct Answer: D [ Bodhi Tree ] ​ Notes: Bodhi Tree is the symbol of nirvana of Gautama Buddha. On the other hand, Stupa represents the symbol of death of Gautama Buddha. Further, The symbol ‘Horse’ signifies the renunciation of Buddha’s life. 6.During whose reign was the Fourth Buddhist Council held? [A] Ashoka [B] Kalasoka [C] Ajatsatru [D] Kanishka Correct Answer: D [ Kanishka ] ​ Notes: The Fourth Buddhist Council was held at Kundalvana, Kashmir in 72 AD during the reign of Kushan king Kanishka.
  • Parliament of India R a J Y a S a B H a Committees

    Parliament of India R a J Y a S a B H a Committees

    Com. Co-ord. Sec. PARLIAMENT OF INDIA R A J Y A S A B H A COMMITTEES OF RAJYA SABHA AND OTHER PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES AND BODIES ON WHICH RAJYA SABHA IS REPRESENTED (Corrected upto 4th September, 2020) RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI (4th September, 2020) Website: http://www.rajyasabha.nic.in E-mail: [email protected] OFFICERS OF RAJYA SABHA CHAIRMAN Shri M. Venkaiah Naidu SECRETARY-GENERAL Shri Desh Deepak Verma PREFACE The publication aims at providing information on Members of Rajya Sabha serving on various Committees of Rajya Sabha, Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees, Joint Committees and other Bodies as on 30th June, 2020. The names of Chairmen of the various Standing Committees and Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees along with their local residential addresses and telephone numbers have also been shown at the beginning of the publication. The names of Members of the Lok Sabha serving on the Joint Committees on which Rajya Sabha is represented have also been included under the respective Committees for information. Change of nominations/elections of Members of Rajya Sabha in various Parliamentary Committees/Statutory Bodies is an ongoing process. As such, some information contained in the publication may undergo change by the time this is brought out. When new nominations/elections of Members to Committees/Statutory Bodies are made or changes in these take place, the same get updated in the Rajya Sabha website. The main purpose of this publication, however, is to serve as a primary source of information on Members representing various Committees and other Bodies on which Rajya Sabha is represented upto a particular period.
  • The Hindu Review Novembers

    The Hindu Review Novembers

    The Monthly Hindu Review | Current Affairs | November 2020 1 www.bankersadda.com | www.sscadda.com | www.careerpower.in | Adda247 App The Monthly Hindu Review | Current Affairs | November 2020 Contents The Most Important Current Affairs November 2020 ................................................................................................. 3 Banking and Financial Current Affairs ........................................................................................................................... 9 Economy Current Affairs ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Business Current Affairs .................................................................................................................................................. 11 International Current Affairs .......................................................................................................................................... 11 National Current Affairs ................................................................................................................................................... 12 States Current Affairs ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 Schemes/Committees ......................................................................................................................................................
  • Mahead-Dec2019.Pdf

    Mahead-Dec2019.Pdf

    MAHAPARINIRVAN DAY 550TH BIRTH ANNIVERSARY: GURU NANAK DEV CLIMATE CHANGE VS AGRICULTURE VOL.8 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER–DECEMBER 2019 ` 50 PAGES 52 Prosperous Maharashtra Our Vision Pahawa Vitthal A Warkari couple wishes Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray after taking oath as the Chief Minister of Maharashtra. (Pahawa Vitthal is a pictorial book by Uddhav Thackeray depicting the culture and rural life of Maharashtra.) CONTENTS What’s Inside 06 THIS IS THE MOMENT The evening of the 28th November 2019 will be long remem- bered as a special evening in the history of Shivaji Park of Mumbai. The ground had witnessed many historic moments in the past with people thronging to listen to Shiv Sena Pramukh, Late Balasaheb Thackeray, and Udhhav Thackeray. This time, when Uddhav Thackeray took the oath as the Chief Minister of Maharashtra on this very ground, the entire place was once again charged with enthusiasm and emotions, with fulfilment seen in every gleaming eye and ecstasy on every face. Maharashtra Ahead brings you special articles on the new Chief Minister of Maharashtra, his journey as a politi- cian, the new Ministers, the State Government's roadmap to building New Maharashtra, and the newly elected members of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly. 44 36 MAHARASHTRA TOURISM IMPRESSES THE BEACON OF LONDON KNOWLEDGE Maharashtra Tourism participated in the recent Bharat Ratna World Travel Market exhibition in London. A Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar platform to meet the world, the event helped believed that books the Department reach out to tourists and brought meaning to life. tourism-related professionals and inform them He had to suffer and about the tourism attractions and facilities the overcome acute sorrow State has.
  • The True Story of Bombay Bomb Blasts by S

    The True Story of Bombay Bomb Blasts by S

    JAC Journal of Arts and Culture ISSN: 0976–9862 & E-ISSN: 0976–9870, Vol. 2, Issue 3, 2011, pp-89-92 Available online at http://www.bioinfo.in/contents.php?id=53 COMMUNAL VIOLENCE TO COMMUNAL TERRORISM: THE HORRENDOUS METAMORPHOSIS AS PORTRAYED IN BLACK FRIDAY: THE TRUE STORY OF BOMBAY BOMB BLASTS BY S. HUSSAIN ZAIDI SHARMA MANJU B.K. Birla Instt. Of Engg. And Technology, Pilani. *Corresponding Author: Email- [email protected] Received: October 20, 2011; Accepted: November 30, 2011 Abstract- Ethnic clashes have been common to the Indian subcontinent since the partition of India in 1947.The Hindu- Muslim riots during the partition of India are one of the most gruesome tragedies of World History. With the rise of the Hindu fundamentalist forces, ethnic riots have erupted time and again at different places in the Nation. The recent decades have witnessed a horrifying metamorphosis of communal violence into communal terrorism. The serial bomb blasts in Bombay (now renamed as Mumbai) on the 12th of March 1993 is the turning point in the form of communal violence; a really horrendous metamorphosis. This paper is an attempt to explore the religious terrorism as witnessed by the whole world when Bombay was targeted by meticulously planned serial bomb blasts under the camouflage of religion. Key words- Hindu-Muslim riots, World History, communal terrorism, serial bomb blasts, communal violence, religion. Introduction The Mumbai blasts of July, 2006, attracted wide publicity chosen for the execution of this ghastly task proves all over the world for two reasons. Firstly it showed once beyond doubt that the perpetrators of terror had lured the again the vulnerability of Mumbai as a city to jihadi young minds in the name of religion.
  • Towards Victim Friendly Responses and Procedures for Prosecuting Rape

    Towards Victim Friendly Responses and Procedures for Prosecuting Rape

    Towards Victim Friendly Responses and Procedures for Prosecuting Rape A STUDY OF PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL STAGES OF RAPE PROSECUTIONS IN DELHI (JAN 2014-MARCH 2015) Partners for Law in Development Conducted with Support of: F-18, First Floor, Jangpura Extension, Department of Justice, New Delhi- 110014 Ministry of Law And Justice T 011- 24316832 / 33 Government of India F 011- 24316833 And E [email protected] United Nations Development Programme TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments iii Executive Summary v Chapter 1: Introduction and Methodology 1 Chapter 2: Overview of Cases and Victims 6 Chapter 3: The Pre-Trial Stage 11 Chapter 4: The Trial Stage 18 Chapter 5: The Need for Support Services 33 Chapter 6: Comparative Law Research 37 Chapter 7: Concluding Observations 46 Annexures Annexure 1: Legislative, Judicial and Executive Guidelines 55 Annexure 2: Templates for Conducting Research 61 Annexure 3: Case Studies (Not for Public Circulation) 65 Annexure 4: Comparative Table of Good Practices from Other Jurisdictions 66 Annexure 5: Letter of Delhi High Court Dated 28.10.2013, Granting Permission For The Study 68 Towards Victim Friendly Responses and Procedures for Prosecuting Rape | i ii | Towards Victim Friendly Responses and Procedures for Prosecuting Rape Acknowledgments This study was conceptualized and executed by Partners for Law in Development, but would not have been possible without the support and engagement of different agencies and individuals, who we express our deep appreciation for. Our gratitude is due to the Delhi High Court for approving this study, enabling us to undertake the trial observation and victim interviews, which were a fundamental part of the research methods for this study.
  • Indiatimes.Com POLL and Formed His Own Group

    Indiatimes.Com POLL and Formed His Own Group

    OID‰‰†‰KOID‰‰†‰OID‰‰†‰MOID‰‰†‰C New Delhi, Tuesday,May 27, 2003www.timesofindia.com Capital 34 pages* Invitation Price Rs. 1.50 International Delhi Times Sport Betrayal. How Saddam’s To college with snob Roger Federer cousins deliberately value - South Campus dumped out of gave Baghdad away gets as hip as North French Open Page 13 Page 5 Page 17 WIN WITH THE TIMES Established 1838 Outsourced: Death in Silicon Valley Lahore bus Bennett, Coleman & Co., Ltd. Peace is a natural effect By Chidanand Rajghatta outsourcing to India, an issue The India connection the deal with Indian companies of trade. TIMES NEWS NETWORK that now seems poised to become will effect no more than 5 per cent a major sticking point between • Bank of America employee of the bank’s 21,000 employees, or — Montesquieu Washington: On a recent April the two countries. Several US about 1,100 jobs, in its technology to run again sees the pink slip on his desk afternoon in Silicon Valley, mo- states are already considering and operations division. NEWS DIGEST ments after he was told he had legislation to ban or limit out- • He comes out, steps into According to some surveys, the been laid off from his computer sourcing. Bank of America is one the parking lot, shoots himself US has lost at least 800,000 jobs in 130 Pak prisoners to be freed Report on Balco : The interests of programming job at a Bank of of the several major US corpora- the past year and some 3.3 million workers of Balco and Modern Foods America training centre, Kevin tions — General Electric, Mi- • His employer outsourced jobs will move overseas over the TIMES NEWS NETWORK progress in the steps an- have been overlooked by the new Flanagan stepped into the park- his job to India nounced by our PM, and crosoft, Intel are among others — next few years because of out- New Delhi: India on Monday owners, Sterlite and Hindustan ing lot and shot himself dead.
  • Breathing Life Into the Constitution

    Breathing Life Into the Constitution

    Breathing Life into the Constitution Human Rights Lawyering In India Arvind Narrain | Saumya Uma Alternative Law Forum Bengaluru Breathing Life into the Constitution Human Rights Lawyering In India Arvind Narrain | Saumya Uma Alternative Law Forum Bengaluru Breathing Life into the Constitution Human Rights Lawyering in India Arvind Narrain | Saumya Uma Edition: January 2017 Published by: Alternative Law Forum 122/4 Infantry Road, Bengaluru - 560001. Karnataka, India. Design by: Vinay C About the Authors: Arvind Narrain is a founding member of the Alternative Law Forum in Bangalore, a collective of lawyers who work on a critical practise of law. He has worked on human rights issues including mass crimes, communal conflict, LGBT rights and human rights history. Saumya Uma has 22 years’ experience as a lawyer, law researcher, writer, campaigner, trainer and activist on gender, law and human rights. Cover page images copied from multiple news articles. All copyrights acknowledged. Any part of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted as necessary. The authors only assert the right to be identified wtih the reproduced version. “I am not a religious person but the only sin I believe in is the sin of cynicism.” Parvez Imroz, Jammu and Kashmir Civil Society Coalition (JKCSS), on being told that nothing would change with respect to the human rights situation in Kashmir Dedication This book is dedicated to remembering the courageous work of human rights lawyers, Jalil Andrabi (1954-1996), Shahid Azmi (1977-2010), K. Balagopal (1952-2009), K.G. Kannabiran (1929-2010), Gobinda Mukhoty (1927-1995), T. Purushotham – (killed in 2000), Japa Lakshma Reddy (killed in 1992), P.A.
  • The Journal of Parliamentary Information ______VOLUME LXIV NO.1 MARCH 2018 ______

    The Journal of Parliamentary Information ______VOLUME LXIV NO.1 MARCH 2018 ______

    The Journal of Parliamentary Information ________________________________________________________ VOLUME LXIV NO.1 MARCH 2018 ________________________________________________________ LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI ___________________________________ THE JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________ VOLUME LXIV NO.1 MARCH 2018 _____________________________________________________________ CONTENTS PAGE ADDRESS - Address by the Speaker, Lok Sabha, Smt. Sumitra Mahajan at the 137th Assembly of IPU at St. Petersburg, Russian Federation -- - Address by the Speaker, Lok Sabha, Smt. Sumitra Mahajan at the 63rd Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference, Dhaka, Bangladesh -- PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES -- PARLIAMENTARY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS -- PRIVILEGE ISSUES -- PROCEDURAL MATTERS -- DOCUMENTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST -- SESSIONAL REVIEW Lok Sabha -- Rajya Sabha -- State Legislatures -- RECENT LITERATURE OF PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST -- APPENDICES -- I. Statement showing the work transacted during the … Thirteenth Session of the Sixteenth Lok Sabha II. Statement showing the work transacted during the … 244th Session of the Rajya Sabha III. Statement showing the activities of the Legislatures of … the States and Union Territories during the period 1 October to 31 December 2017 IV. List of Bills passed by the Houses of Parliament … and assented to by the President during the period 1 October to 31 December 2017 V. List of Bills passed by the Legislatures of the States … and the Union Territories during the period 1 October to 31 December 2017 VI. Ordinances promulgated by the Union … and State Governments during the period 1 October to 31 December 2017 VII. Party Position in the Lok Sabha, the Rajya Sabha … and the Legislatures of the States and the Union Territories ADDRESS OF THE SPEAKER, LOK SABHA, SMT. SUMITRA MAHAJAN AT THE 137TH ASSEMBLY OF THE INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION (IPU), HELD IN ST.
  • Medical Officer of Health Department

    Medical Officer of Health Department

    BRIHANMUMBAI MAHANAGARPALIKA Section 4 Manuals as per provision of RTI Act, 2005 of ‘ M/W ’ Ward MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT Address - Office of Medical Officer of Health, R No. 208, 2ND Floor, ‘M/W’ Ward Building, SHARADBHAU AACHARYA Road, CHEMBUR (East), Mumbai – 400 071 1 INDEX Sr, Section 4 (1) B Description of the Chapter’s Contents Page No. No. Sub Clauses Introduction 1 4 (1) (b) (i) Particulars of Organization, Function and Duties Organization’s structural chart (Organogram) 2 4 (1) (b) (ii) Powers and Duties of Officers and Employees Procedure followed in Decision Making Process including 3 4 (1) (b) (iii) Channels of supervision and accountability 4 4 (1) (b) (iv) Norms set for discharge of its functions The rules, regulation, instruction, manuals and records, held by it or under its control or used by the employees for 5 4 (1) (b) (v) discharging department functions Statement of categories of documents that are held and under 6 4 (1) (b) (vi) the control of the office of Medical Officer Of Health Particulars of any arrangement that exists for consultation with 7 4 (1) (b) (vii) the members of the public in relation to the formulation of the department’s policy and implementation thereof. A Statement of the boards, councils, committees and other bodies consisting of two or more persons constituted as its part or far the purpose of its advice, and as to whether meetings of 8 4 (1) (b) (viii) those boards, councils, committees and other bodies are open to the public or the minutes of such meetings are accessible for public.
  • Supreme Court of India Miscellaneous Matters to Be Listed on 19-02-2021

    Supreme Court of India Miscellaneous Matters to Be Listed on 19-02-2021

    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS TO BE LISTED ON 19-02-2021 ADVANCE LIST - AL/1/2021 SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 SLP(Crl) No. 6080/2020 JITENDERA TANEJA SANCHIT GARGA II Versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL, MANISH KUMAR[R-2] APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[IMPL] {Mention Memo} FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.123635/2020- EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.123634/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.129389/2020-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT and IA No.129391/2020-PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON, MR. RAM KISHAN, APPLICANT-IN- PERSON HAS FILED APPLICATIONS FOR IMPLEADMENT AS RESPONDENT NO.3 AND PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON as per residence by mentioning list on 19.2.2021 IA No. 123635/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 123634/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 129389/2020 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 129391/2020 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON 2 Crl.A. No. 1157/2018 K. BALAJI RAJESH KUMAR II-C Versus THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1] POLICE {Mention Memo} IA No. 67915/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 67911/2020 - GRANT OF BAIL 3 Crl.A. No. 191/2020 MADAN LAL KALRA DEVASHISH BHARUKA[P-1] II-C Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1] {Mention Memo} only crlmp no. 18696/21 in connected crl.a.
  • The Death Penalty

    The Death Penalty

    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA Report No.262 The Death Penalty August 2015 U;k;ewfrZ vftr izdk'k 'kgk Justice Ajit Prakash Shah HkwriwoZ eq[; U;k;k/kh'k] fnYyh mPp U;k;ky; Former Chief Justice of Delhi High court v/;{k Chairman Hkkjr dk fof/k vk;ksx Law Commission of India Hkkjr ljdkj Government of India 14ok¡ ry] fgUnqLrku VkbZEl gkÅl] 14th Floor, Hindustan Times House dLrwjck xk¡/kh ekxZ Kasturba Gandhi Marg ubZ fnYyh&110 001 New Delhi – 110 001 D.O. No.6(3)263/2014-LC(LS) 31 August 2015 Dear Mr. Sadananda Gowda ji, The Law Commission of India received a reference from the Supreme Court in Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar v. Maharashtra [(2009) 6 SCC 498] and Shankar Kisanrao Khade v. Maharashtra [(2013) 5 SCC 546], to study the issue of the death penalty in India to “allow for an up-to-date and informed discussion and debate on the subject.” This is not the first time that the Commission has been asked to look into the death penalty – the 35th Report (“Capital Punishment”, 1967), notably, is a key report in this regard. That Report recommended the retention of the death penalty in India. The Supreme Court has also, in Bachan Singh v. UOI [AIR 1980 SC 898], upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, but confined its application to the ‘rarest of rare cases’, to reduce the arbitrariness of the penalty. However, the social, economic and cultural contexts of the country have changed drastically since the 35th report.