Achebe's Receding Male Chauvinism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY IN POZNAŃ Journal of Gender and Power Vol. 6, No. 2, 2016 POZNAŃ 2016 2 Submissions Journal of Gender and Power is aimed at providing an international forum for discussing various issues and processes of gender construction. It is a scholarly, interdisciplinary journal, which features articles in all fields of gender studies, drawing on various paradigms and approaches. We invite scholars to submit articles and reviews reporting on theoretical considerations and empirical research. Journal of Gender and Power is published by Faculty of Educational Studies, Adam Mickiewicz University (Poznań – Poland). Editorial Board Editor-in-Chief Agnieszka Gromkowska-Melosik Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland Editorial Assistant Michał Klichowski Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland Cecilia Asberg (Linkoping University, Sweden), Zygmunt Bauman (University of Leeds, England), Francesca Bettio (University of Siena, Italy), Mary Blair-Loy (University of Califor- nia, USA), Doris Chang (Wichita State University, USA), Miranda Christou (University of Cyprus, Cyprus), Lorraine Dowler (Pennsylvania State University, USA), Catherine Driscoll (University of Sydney, Australia), Virginia Ferreira (University of Coimbra, Portugal), Eva Fodor (Central European University, Hungary), Eleanor Gordon (University of Glasgow, Scot- land), Lawrence Grossberg (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA), Anita Harris (Monash University, Australia), Beata Kowalska (Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Poland), Michael A. Messner (University of Southern California, USA), Joanna Pawelczyk (Adam Mic- kiewicz University, Poland), Adriana Piscitelli (State University of Campinas, Brazil), Lydia Potts (Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany), Renata Siemieńska (University of Warsaw, Poland), Krystyna Slany (Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Poland), Vappu Sunnari (University of Oulu, Finland), Boguslaw Sliwerski (The Maria Grzegorzewska Acad- emy of Special Education & Christian Theological Academy, Poland), Sarah Thebaud (Universi- ty of California, USA), Iris van der Tuin (Utrecht University, Netherlands), Valentina I. Uspen- skaya (Tver State University, Russia), Denise Walsh (University of Virginia, USA), Eva Zamojska (Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland) Language Editor Łukasz Pakuła Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland Statistical Editor Krystyna Katulska Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland Publikacja sfinansowana przez Wydział Studiów Edukacyjnych UAM © Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 2016 Wersja pierwotna czasopisma: drukowana Opracowanie komputerowe okładki: K. & S. Szurpit Na okładce: Indian woman with little daughter carrying water from well by Getty Images ISSN 2391-8187 Contents Editor’s Preface (Agnieszka Gromkowska-Melosik) ........................................................... 5 ARTICLES GONZALO BUSTAMANTE-KUSCHEL Modern Androgyny as the Basis for Corporal Republicanism: the Case of Marriage .......................................................................................................................................... 11 ANTHONY NJOKU Achebe’s Receding Male Chauvinism: A Study of Anthills of the Savannah ... 33 MARK CHINGONO Women, the Informal Economy and the State in Lesotho ..................................... 51 MARIOLA CHOMCZYŃSKA-RUBACHA, KRZYSZTOF RUBACHA Readiness to Resist: Biological Sex and the Cultural Definition of Femininity and Masculinity .................................................................................................. 77 STACEY FLEMING, MELINDA R. PIERSON, ERICA J. HOWELL The Effects of Exercise on Academic Performance for Boys and Girls ............ 89 HARASANKAR ADHIKARI Determinants of Infertility among Couples in Urban India and its Impact ... 103 MONIKA FARKASOVA Violence Against Women Living in Marginalized Social Environment — Romani Women ..................................................................................................................... 121 FRANCES SANTOS-CAMPOY, DEBRA L. COTE, KRISTIN STANG Technology and Special Education: Implementation and Instructional Practice for Students with Special Needs ...................................................................... 133 BOOK REVIEWS FEDERICA FORMATO Ruth Wodak. The politics of fear: what right-wing populist discourses mean. London 2015: Sage, pp. 238. .................................................................................... 149 4 Contents MARTA DZIARNOWSKA Dorota Hall. Searching for a Place: LGBT Christians in Poland. Warsaw 2016: IFiS Publishers, pp. 395. ............................................................................................. 154 Submissions ............................................................................................................................................ 159 List of Reviewers for 2016 Year ..................................................................................................... 161 Editor’s Preface In debates on the situation of contemporary women, the notion of emancipation seems to be a kind of picklock that opens all possible doors. It has been used in dozen, if not hundreds of ways. As a result, to a larger and larger degree, it starts sharing the destiny of other critical notions and categories. That is why nowadays it is so difficult to answer questions such as: “emancipation from what?”, “emancipation for what?”. It is even more so as in the 20th century women gained the same rights and opportunities as men. They obtain university degrees, they are doctors, attorneys and university professors. They are MPs and sometimes they hold highest possible offices: these of state presidents, prime ministers, Supreme Court judges. Contraceptives liberated them from unwanted pregnancies and, as a consequence, abandoning their carriers and devoting themselves to child rearing. From what should we thus emancipate already emancipated women? There is also another problem: specific trends in the feminist move- ment prefer different interpretation and “content” of the notion of emancipation. At the same time, they perform a very typical procedure (in the case of ideological or political battle): they present their version as the only right one, final and unquestionable. They want their particu- lar understanding of emancipation to gain universal status by aiming at marginalization of other modes of understanding of this very notion. This is a case of an attempt at creating Foucault's regime of truth and imposing knowledge on the meaning of contemporary women's emanci- pation as the only true one. From the post-structuralist perspective, this is nothing else than just an attempt at gaining power over meanings and identities. Emancipation always constitutes a social construct and is defined by specific socio-historical conditions that give political strength to selected postulates while forcing others into silence. In the past, in the first phases of existence of the feminist movement, relative agreement reigned as to the content of women's emancipation (which was connect- 6 Editor’s Preface ed with preference for obvious requests in equality of rights of women). In the last decades, the number of social constructs (and those aiming at getting meta-narrative status) rivalling in definition of women's emanci- pation and, even broader, in defining what does it mean to be a woman increased that much that probably only a “professional feminist” can get a full grasp of the issue (participants of never-ending polemics whose essence lies on accusing one another of “false feminism”). An average female sympathizer of feminist movement creates, at the level of her own common sense, her own interpretation of women's emancipation being an eclectic product of her own biography and feminist postulates she encountered. Sometime she also rejects all the proposals concerning emancipation, she escapes freedom for fear of responsibility for her own life and for fear of necessity of making never-ending choices. In a world dominated by ambiguity, indeterminacy and lack of clear success rules, apart from unquestionable limitation the rhythms of life of a prisoner or a slave has one significant advantage: it is established in an unambigu- ous manner which eliminates all the insecurity and shifts responsibility for one life to others. What is my own opinion on emancipation of women? As a point of departure, I would like to note that each emancipation programme should refer to a specific historical “here and now”, to concrete socio- cultural conditions and concrete female identity constructs. Creation of “universal” programmes in emancipation irrevocably leads to an attempt at making some particular experience, biographies, opinions and concepts universal while marginalizing others. Usually in such cases we are also dealing with essentialization of femininity i.e. exposing one or several features of femininity as immanent. In such a case, one ver- sion of feminism claims the right to speak for “all women” which leads to an attempt at appropriation of all the dissimilar voices and dissimilar experiences as well as to never-ending debates on what feminism is and what it is not combined with mutual accusations of “false identity” (and attempts and raising the true awareness). Therefore, it is necessary to agree on pluralisation of the feminist discourse even if it introduces theoretical chaos and political conflicts (within the movement). If biog- raphies, experience, and aspirations to different groups