Extradition Treaties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Extradition Treaties International CooperationinCriminalMatters Volume II COMPENDIUM OF BILATERAL AND REGIONAL INSTRUMENTS FOR SOUTH ASIA International Cooperation in Criminal Matters Volume II UNODC Regional Office for South Asia, New Delhi and Terrorism Prevention Branch, Vienna New Delhi, 2015 Acknowledgements UNODC is grateful to the team of Indian Law Institute, New Delhi, for jointly developing this document: Principal Author and Support Team Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Director, Indian Law Institute, India Ms. Yashita Munjal, Advocate, India Mr. Ankur Arora, Advocate, India Ms. Srishti Sharma, Advocate, India Late Sh. Bharat Raj Upreti, Senior Partner, Pioneer Law Associates, Nepal Mr. Oves Anwar, Research Society of International Law, Pakistan Mr. Ammar Ather Saeed, Advocate, Pakistan Ms. Summaiya Zaidi, Advocate, Pakistan Dr. Dayanath Jayasuriya, President’s Counsel, Sri Lanka Ms. Neha Parihar, Student of Law, Mody University of Science and Technology, India Ms. Bhanu Maheshwari, Student of Law, Mody University of Science and Technology, India Ms. Aarzo Thareja, Student of Law, Mody University of Science and Technology, India Ms. Himani, Student of Law, Mody University of Science and Technology, India This Compendium would not have been finalized without the indispensable contribution from the national government counterparts in the eight countries, including Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Home Affairs, Interior, Law and Justice, Attorney General Offices, and distinguished research institutes from the countries in the region. UNODC Regional Office for South Asia Ms. Cristina Albertin, Representative Ms. Suruchi Pant, Deputy Representative Ms. Pooja Ahluwalia, Terrorism Prevention Expert Ms. Isheeta Sumra, Communications Officer Ms. Savita Bhat, Admin and Finance Assistant UNODC Terrorism Prevention Branch Implementation Support Section I (Asia and Europe) Ms. Dolgor Solongo, Officer-in-Charge Ms. Laura Adal, International Consultant Made possible by the financial support of the Government of the United States ofAmerica This publication has not been edited according to standard UNODC guidelines. October 2015 Foreword With the increased mobility of people, information and goods, terrorism has progressively evolved into a transnational threat, transcending classic geographic and cultural borders, as both actors and victims alike have become involved on a worldwide scale. With this ever-growing challenge for the international community, one State alone is no longer in a position to respond to terrorism. Rather, international cooperation has become a fundamental necessity in the global fight against terrorism. Legal responses, from the national, bilateral and regional levels serve to facilitate cooperation and harmonize criminal justice responses to terrorism by and amongst States. The implementation of effective judicial cooperation through extradition and mutual legal assistance allows for an effective response. The authorities of eight countries in South Asia - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, have cooperated with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) in an effort to produce this compilation of legal documents on international cooperation in criminal matters, namely mutual legal assistance and extradition. The Compendium aims to provide practitioners and other actors involved in international cooperation in criminal matters with a reference tool to assist them in information sharing and the gathering of evidence for use in criminal investigations and prosecutions involving terrorism, in addition to traditional police to police cooperation. It contains bilateral and regional agreements, as well as related national legislative provisions. It is with the hope that its wide distribution among legal practitioners and criminal justice officials in the region will contribute to facilitating international cooperation in criminal matters. This Compendium has been elaborated by UNODC, in cooperation with the Indian Law Institute, New Delhi, as well as the Research Society of International Law, Pakistan. This Compendium would not have been finalized without the indispensable contribution from the national government counterparts in the eight countries, including Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Home Affairs, Interior, Law and Justice, Attorney General Offices, and distinguished research institutes from the countries in the region, as well as the generous financial contribution of the Government of the United States of America. iii Note for the Reader The Compendium of bilateral and regional instruments and national legislative provisions on extradition and mutual legal assistance with and within the States of the South Asia region is compiled in two hard copy and electronic volumes. The instruments are produced in English and are in force on extradition and mutual legal assistance. The Compendium is an extensive compilation of relevant documents made available directly by national governments, as well as through in depth desk research. However, please note that the instruments in this Compendium may not be an exhaustive list for every country within the South Asia region. It is worth mentioning that the legal texts contained in the Compendium were either provided directly by the concerned Ministries (Foreign Affairs, Home Affairs, Law and Justice), Attorney General Offices, and Permanent Missions, National research institutes or found on official websites of relevant countries. In order to effectively update the Compendium, practitioners are encouraged to turn to their national administrations and provide us, as soon as possible, with legal texts which are either missing or which recently entered into force. You are invited to consult our website regularly for the latest update and for an optimal use of the Compendium. v Table of Contents Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................................ii Foreword .............................................................................................................................................. iii Note for the Reader ................................................................................................................................v Volume I AFGHANISTAN National Laws: • Criminal Procedure Code, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, 2014 ................................................3 • Law on Extradition of the Accused, Convicted Individual and Legal Cooperation, 2013 ..............4 • Law on Combat against Terrorist Offences, 2008 ..........................................................................22 • Law on Combating the Financing of Terrorism, 2004 ..................................................................33 • Law on Crimes against Internal and External Security, 1987 ........................................................46 • Amendments to the Anti-Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime, 2004 ................................55 Extradition Treaties: • Extradition Agreement between the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and the State of the United Arab Emirates, 2008 .................................................................................................61 Transfer of Offenders Treaties: • Agreement on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons between the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and the United Arab Emirates, 2013 .............................................................................................68 BANGLADESH National Laws: • The Extradition Act, 1974 ..............................................................................................................77 • The Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, 2012 ........................................................85 • The Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Rules, 2013 ...................................................100 • The Anti-Terrorism Act, 2009 ......................................................................................................115 • The Anti-Terrorism Rules, 2013 ...................................................................................................143 vii Table of Contents Extradition Treaties: • Treaty between the Kingdom of Thailand and the People’s Republic of Bangladesh relating to Extradition, 1998 .........................................................................................................................163 • Treaty between the Republic of India and People’s Republic of Bangladesh relating to Extradition, 2013 ..........................................................................................................................173 Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties: • Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters, 2010 .......................181 Transfer of Offenders Treaties: • Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh on Transfer of Sentenced Persons ....................................189 Counter Terrorism Cooperation Treaties: • Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh on Combating International Terrorism, Organised Crime and Illicit Drug Trafficking, 2010 ......................................................................................................196 BHUTAN National Laws: • Constitution of Bhutan, 2008
Recommended publications
  • Guide to Combat Crime Related to Falsified Medical Products
    COMBATING FALSIFIED MEDICAL PRODUCT-RELATED CR ME A GUIDE TO GOOD LEGISLATIVE PRACTICES UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME COMBATING FALSIFIED MEDICAL PRODUCT-RELATED CRIME: A GUIDE TO GOOD LEGISLATIVE PRACTICES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2019 i Acknowledgements This Guide was prepared by the Organized Crime Branch, Division for Treaty Affairs, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, and was funded by France. This Guide benefited from the invaluable contributions of numerous experts in falsified medical products from all continents of the world, acting in their individual capacity. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime also wishes to thank the Council of Europe, the Economic Community of West African States, the European Union, the International Council of Nurses, the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), the New Partnership for Africa’s Development, the World Customs Organization and the World Health Organization for providing their expertise. Core team Hugo Bonar, Antonio De Vivo, Marion Ehalt, Karen Kramer, Riikka Puttonen and Christian Tournié Legal editing Colin Craig © United Nations, May 2019. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or nonprofit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty Profile
    Format-II FACULTY PROFILE 1. Name: Dr. SHOBHA RAWAT 2. Designation: ASSISTANT PROFESSOR (Guest Faculty) 3. Qualification: M. Sc. BOTANT, Ph. D 4. Area of Specialization/Research field: LICHENOLOGY 5. Awards/Recognitions: RGNF- JRF (2007) RGNF- SRF (2009) UGC-POST DOCTORAL FELLOW (2012) 6. Number of Research projects: 01 i) Completed Sl. No. Title of the project Funding Agency Amount(Rs.) Year (From-To) 1 UGC- (PDF) UGC 18,75, 883 Rs. 2012-2017 ii) On-going: NA 7. Number of Ph. D candidates successfully completed: NO 8. Number of Ph. D candidates currently working: NO 9. Publications: 20 i) Books: NO ii) Research Articles published in journals 1. Rawat, S., Upreti, D. K. and Singh, R. P. (2009). Lichen flora of Mandal and adjoining localities towards Ukhimath in Chamoli district of Uttarakhand. Journal of Phytological Research 22 (1) 47-52. ISSN: 0970-5767. 2. Rawat, S., Upreti, D. K. and Singh, R. P. (2010). Lichen diversity in Valley of Flowers National Park Western Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Phytotaxonomy 10 112-117. ISSN 0972-4206. 3. Rawat, S., Upreti, D. K. and P. K. Divakar (2011). Xanthoparmelia xizangensis (J. C. Wei) Hale, a new record of lichen from India. Geophytology 41 (1-2) 101- 103. ISSN 0376-5561. 4. Rawat, S., Upreti, D. K. and Singh, R. P., (2011). Estimation of epiphytic lichen litter fall biomass in three temperate forests of Chamoli district, Uttarakhand, India. International Society for Tropical Ecology 52 (2) 193-200. ISSN 0564-3295 5. Rawat, S., Singh, R. P. Upreti, D. K., (2013). Lichen Diversity Of Durmi Forest In Chamoli District, Uttarakhand, Journal Of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, 37(2), 223.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Custody in Classical Islamic Law and Laws of Contemporary Muslim World (An Analysis)
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 5; March 2014 Child Custody in Classical Islamic Law and Laws of Contemporary Muslim World (An Analysis) Aayesha Rafiq Assistant Professor Fatima Jinnah Women University Pakistan; Formerly Research Scholar at University of California Los Angeles. Abstract This article attempts to deliberate on the child custody laws in classical Islamic texts and the contemporary Muslim World with special focus on development of child custody laws in Pakistan. For classical Islamic law, the article refers to the laws as stated in the compendiums of fiqh of sunni and shi’ i schools of thought as well as decisions of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) his companions and leading Muslim jurists. For the purpose of this study, contemporary Muslim world is divided into Muslim majority regions of Central Asia and Caucasus, South Asia, Southeast Asia, North Africa, South Africa, West Africa, Horn of Africa and Middle East. A thorough analysis of customary practices, personal status laws and trends of courts in these Muslim majority regions is carried out. Effort is made to bring out similarities, differences and developments in child custody laws in contemporary Muslim world. The article is delimited to the discussion on child custody in cases of divorce, judicial separation or dissolution of marriage only. In the end it is suggested that uniform laws can be formulated for the entire Muslim world, in the light of Islamic principles and contemporary practices of the Muslim world. Keywords: child custody, Islamic law, fiqh, shariah, contemporary laws, divorce. 1. Introduction Cases of child custody fall under muamlat in compendiums of Islamic Fiqh.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5A – Consultations the List Includes Stakeholders Interviewed During the Inception and Field Phase of the Joint Evaluation
    Joint Evaluation of the Secondary Education Support Programme Appendix 5a – Consultations The list includes stakeholders interviewed during the inception and field phase of the joint evaluation. In addition, the joint evaluation has benefited from feedback made by participants at the inception seminar and the seminar arranged to present the draft report. These included government officials, researchers, peer reviewers, civil society representatives and development partners. Appendix 5b has details on stakeholders consulted at districts and school level. Name Position Institution 1. Arjun Bahadur Bhandari Joint Secretary MoE 2. Janardhan Nepal Joint Secretary 3. Dr. Lava Deo Awasthi Joint Secretary 4. Bharat Nepali Pyakurel Under Secretary School Inspectorate, MoE 5. Ram Bahadur Khadka Section Officer 6. Ms. Usha Paudel (Kandel) Section Officer 7. Gopal Prasad Bhandari Section Officer 8. Nakul Baniya Section Officer Policy Analysis & Planning 9. Pralhad Aryal Section Officer Section, MOE 10. Deepak Sharma Under Secretary 11. Geha Nath Gautam Section Officer Planning Section, MoE 12. Narayan K Shrestha Section Officer Foreign Aid Coordination 13. Indra Bahadur Kunwar Section Officer Section (FACS), MOE 14. Mukunda Khanal Section Officer 15. Lesha Nath Poudel Under Secretary 16. Subhadra Kumari RC Thapa Under Secretary 17. Frank Jensen Chief Technical Adviser Education Sector Advisory Team / MoE 18. Mahashram Sharma Director General DoE 19. Chudamani Poudel Section Chief Gender Equity Section, DOE 20. Damodar Regmi Section Officer 21. Dibya Dawadi Section Officer 22. Kamala Gyawali Section Officer 23. Ram Hari Rijal 24. Arun Tiwari Section Chief Inclusive Education Section, 25. Ganesh Poudel Section Officer DOE 26. Narayan Subedi Section Officer 27. Kumar Bhattarai Section Officer 28.
    [Show full text]
  • R&D-FIAN Parallel Information Nepal
    Reference: The Second Periodic Report (Art.1-15) of Nepal to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (UN Doc. E/C.12/NPL/2) Parallel Information The Right to Adequate Food in Nepal (Article 11, ICESCR) Submitted at the occasion of the 38th session of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (30 April - May 2007) by FIAN International, an NGO in consultative status with ECOSOC, working for the right to feed oneself and Rights & Democracy, a Canadian institution in consultative status with ECOSOC working to promote the International Bill of Human Rights. - 1 - Table of Contents I. Preliminary remarks p.3 II. The situation of the Right to Food in Nepal p.4 III. Legal Framework of the Right to Food in Nepal p.16 IV. Illustrative cases of violations of the Right to Food p.22 V. Concluding remarks p.27 VI. Recommendations to the CESCR p.28 Annex I - Description of the International Fact-Finding Mission p.29 Annex II - List of Acronyms p.37 - 2 - I. Preliminary remarks The present document is presented to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as parallel information to the second periodic report of Nepal to the CESCR. The submitting organizations would like to acknowledge the opportunity given by the CESCR procedures and share with the Committee the first findings of two research projects which have been carried out by Rights & Democracy and FIAN International. 1. The Fact-Finding Mission to Nepal (coordinated by Rights & Democracy) The first measure is the Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) which took place from 8 to 20 April 2007 and was organized by the Canadian institution Rights & Democracy in collaboration with the Right to Food Research Unit at the University of Geneva, FIAN International and the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan, Country Information
    Pakistan, Country Information PAKISTAN ASSESSMENT April 2003 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III ECONOMY IV HISTORY V STATE STRUCTURES VI HUMAN RIGHTS VIA. HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES VIB. HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS VIC. HUMAN RIGHTS - OTHER ISSUES ANNEX A: CHRONOLOGY OF MAJOR EVENTS ANNEX B: POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS AND OTHER GROUPS ANNEX C: PROMINENT PEOPLE ANNEX D: REFERENCES TO SOURCE MATERIAL 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a wide variety of recognised sources. The document does not contain any Home Office opinion or policy. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum / human rights determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum / human rights claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. These sources have been checked for currency, and as far as can be ascertained, remained relevant and up to date at the time the document was issued. 1.4 It is intended to revise the assessment on a six-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum-seeker producing countries in the United Kingdom. 2. GEOGRAPHY file:///V|/vll/country/uk_cntry_assess/apr2003/0403_Pakistan.htm[10/21/2014 9:56:32 AM] Pakistan, Country Information General 2.1 The Islamic Republic of Pakistan lies in southern Asia, bordered by India to the east and Afghanistan and Iran to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • European Convention on Extradition
    European Treaty Series - No. 24 European Convention on Extradition Paris, 13.XII.1957 The governments signatory hereto, being members of the Council of Europe, Considering that the aim of the Council of Europe is to achieve a greater unity between its members; Considering that this purpose can be attained by the conclusion of agreements and by common action in legal matters; Considering that the acceptance of uniform rules with regard to extradition is likely to assist this work of unification, Have agreed as follows: Article 1 – Obligation to extradite The Contracting Parties undertake to surrender to each other, subject to the provisions and conditions laid down in this Convention, all persons against whom the competent authorities of the requesting Party are proceeding for an offence or who are wanted by the said authorities for the carrying out of a sentence or detention order. Article 2 – Extraditable offences 1 Extradition shall be granted in respect of offences punishable under the laws of the requesting Party and of the requested Party by deprivation of liberty or under a detention order for a maximum period of at least one year or by a more severe penalty. Where a conviction and prison sentence have occurred or a detention order has been made in the territory of the requesting Party, the punishment awarded must have been for a period of at least four months. 2 If the request for extradition includes several separate offences each of which is punishable under the laws of the requesting Party and the requested Party by deprivation of liberty or under a detention order, but of which some do not fulfil the condition with regard to the amount of punishment which may be awarded, the requested Party shall also have the right to grant extradition for the latter offences.
    [Show full text]
  • CH 10 Confessions
    CONFESSIONS .............................................................................................. 1 §10-1 Fifth Amendment Rights .......................................................................... 1 §10-2 Suppression Motions and Hearings ..................................................... 12 §10-3 Miranda Warnings ................................................................................... 17 §10-3(a) Generally ......................................................................................... 17 §10-3(b) Non-Police Interrogation ............................................................. 26 §10-3(c) “In custody” .................................................................................... 28 §10-3(d) “Interrogation” ............................................................................... 49 §10-4 Waiver of Rights ....................................................................................... 53 §10-4(a) Generally ......................................................................................... 53 §10-4(b) Interrogation After the Right to Counsel Attaches ............... 62 §10-4(c) Interrogation After Request for Counsel ................................. 68 §10-4(d) Interrogation After Request to Remain Silent ....................... 82 §10-5 Voluntariness ............................................................................................ 89 §10-5(a) Generally ......................................................................................... 89 §10-5(b) Examples:
    [Show full text]
  • World Law Bulletin, February 2001
    WLB 2001.02, February 2001 Indian rights The LAW Intellectual property law Internet security regulation Islamic edicts LIBRARY of Judicial independence Lifelong learning Marriage law CONGRESS Nuclear power plant Press freedom Privacy Wrongful birth case Updates: WORLD • World Trade Organization LAW • European Union Developments BULLETIN FOREIGN LAW FOCUS: Germany: Constitutional Court Rules on the Recognition of Jehovah’s Administration of medicines Witnesses Auditors China/Vietnam joint statement Embryo research People’s Republic of China: Farmers’ associations Extradition Law Firearms trading Foreign investment Income tax 2 WLB, No. 2001.02 –Lifelong learning law –Tax law amended The WORLD LAW EUROPE BULLETIN: a monthly France–Embryo research awareness service prepared by the Staff –“Wrongful birth” case of the Law Library of Congress. The Netherlands–Action against illegal trading in Editors: Constance Axinn Johnson and firearms Wendy I. Zeldin. For more information --Cameras and Privacy or research tailored to your needs, call: Slovakia–Auditors the Directorate of Legal Research, Ukraine–Hearings on press freedom at 7-4351 or fax: 7-1820. The Bulletin and information on Law SOUTH PACIFC Library services for Congress can be Australia–Judicial Independence found online: http://lcweb.loc.gov/law/congress. LAW AND ORGANIZATIONS– INTERNATIONAL AND REGIONAL GLIN: The Global Legal Information China/Vietnam–Cooperation statement Network, a primary source of authentic legal information serving congressional research needs, is accessed through
    [Show full text]
  • Human Security in Nepal: Concepts, Issues and Challenges
    Human Security in Nepal: Concepts, Issues and Challenges 1 Human Security in Nepal: Concepts, Issues and Challenges Edited by Bishnu Raj Upreti Rajan Bhattarai Geja Sharma Wagle Published by Nepal Institute for Policy Studies and South Asia Regional Coordination Office of NCCR (North-South) Kathmandu 2013 Citation: Upreti BR, Bhattarai R, Wagle GS, editors. 2013. Human Security in Nepal: Concepts, Issues and Challenges. Kathmandu: Nepal Institute for Policy Studies (NIPS) and South Asia Regional Coordination Office of NCCR (North-South). Copyright © 2013 by NIPS and NCCR North-South, Kathmandu, Nepal. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-9937-2-5257-7 Subsidised price: NRs. 400/- Layout & cover design: Jyoti Khatiwada Printed by: Heidel Press Pvt. Ltd. Dillibazar, Kathmandu Cover Concept: Safal Ghimire Disclaimer: The content and materials presented in this book are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the institution with which the authors are affiliated. Dedication To the millions of people who are suffering from human insecurity. Acknowledgements The issue of security is a little-debated matter in our academic domain. When it comes to dealing human security, we often confront questions like: What constitutes human security? Why has it become so pertinent for a country like Nepal? How can human security be made tenable? These and many other questions on human security came to our mind before we decided to publish this book. This is our small attempt to address some of those questions and generate debate and discussion on the increasingly changing security dynamics of Nepal. This book is the collective outcome of the efforts of several people.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Religion & Religious Minorities in Pakistan: a Study Of
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 19, Issue 1 1995 Article 5 Freedom of Religion & Religious Minorities in Pakistan: A Study of Judicial Practice Tayyab Mahmud∗ ∗ Copyright c 1995 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Freedom of Religion & Religious Minorities in Pakistan: A Study of Judicial Practice Tayyab Mahmud Abstract Pakistan’s successive constitutions, which enumerate guaranteed fundamental rights and pro- vide for the separation of state power and judicial review, contemplate judicial protection of vul- nerable sections of society against unlawful executive and legislative actions. This Article focuses upon the remarkably divergent pronouncements of Pakistan’s judiciary regarding the religious status and freedom of religion of one particular religious minority, the Ahmadis. The superior judiciary of Pakistan has visited the issue of religious freedom for the Ahmadis repeatedly since the establishment of the State, each time with a different result. The point of departure for this ex- amination is furnished by the recent pronouncement of the Supreme Court of Pakistan (”Supreme Court” or “Court”) in Zaheeruddin v. State,’ wherein the Court decided that Ordinance XX of 1984 (”Ordinance XX” or ”Ordinance”), which amended Pakistan’s Penal Code to make the public prac- tice by the Ahmadis of their religion a crime, does not violate freedom of religion as mandated by the Pakistan Constitution. This Article argues that Zaheeruddin is at an impermissible variance with the implied covenant of freedom of religion between religious minorities and the Founding Fathers of Pakistan, the foundational constitutional jurisprudence of the country, and the dictates of international human rights law.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Citizenship Law:Pakistan
    CITIZENSHIP COUNTRY REPORT 2016/13 REPORT ON DECEMBER CITIZENSHIP 2016 LAW:PAKISTAN AUTHORED BY FARYAL NAZIR © Faryal Nazir, 2016 This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the year and the publisher. Requests should be addressed to [email protected]. Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual authors and not those of the European University Institute. EUDO Citizenship Observatory Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Report on Citizenship Law: Pakistan RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2016/13 December 2016 © Faryal Nazir, 2016 Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), created in 1992 and directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics. The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes, projects and data sets, in addition to a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration, the expanding membership of the European Union, developments in Europe’s neighbourhood and the wider world.
    [Show full text]