DOCSLIB.ORG

Butte Creek Watershed Project Existing Conditions Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Butte Creek Watershed Project Existing Conditions Report BUTTE CREEK WATERSHED PROJECT EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Prepared For: Butte Creek Watershed Conservancy Prepared By: Butte Creek Watershed Project California State University, Chico August 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................................................... i INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 1 General Stakeholder & Watershed Advisory Committee Process............................................................................. 2 Existing Conditions Report..................................................................................................................................... 2 Geographic Information System (GIS).................................................................................................................... 3 Education Program................................................................................................................................................. 4 Watershed Management Strategy............................................................................................................................ 5 PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OF THE WATERSHED ............................................................................................. 6 1. Location and Overview of the Area.................................................................................................................... 6 Butte Meadows ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Butte Creek Canyon ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Valley Section............................................................................................................................................... 7 Butte Basin ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Geology, Basin Morphology, and Hydrologic System ........................................................................................ 9 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Butte Meadows ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Upper Butte Creek Canyon.......................................................................................................................... 10 Middle Butte Creek Canyon ........................................................................................................................ 11 Lower Butte Creek Canyon ......................................................................................................................... 12 Valley Section and Butte Basin ................................................................................................................... 13 Stream Flows .............................................................................................................................................. 20 Data Gaps ................................................................................................................................................... 23 3. Fluvial Geomorphology................................................................................................................................... 25 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 25 Flow Regime............................................................................................................................................... 25 Channel Morphology................................................................................................................................... 26 Channel Stability......................................................................................................................................... 27 Erosion and Sedimentation.......................................................................................................................... 28 Problem Areas ............................................................................................................................................ 28 4. Water Supply and Service Areas of Water Suppliers ........................................................................................ 29 Historical Background................................................................................................................................. 29 Water Suppliers .......................................................................................................................................... 29 Groundwater............................................................................................................................................... 35 5. Water Quality.................................................................................................................................................. 39 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 39 Water Quality Goals.................................................................................................................................... 39 Sources of Water Quality Monitoring Information ....................................................................................... 39 Water Quality Monitoring ........................................................................................................................... 39 Analysis of Historic Monitoring and Water Quality Data ............................................................................. 41 Current Sampling Methods.......................................................................................................................... 43 Monitored Water Quality Parameters........................................................................................................... 43 Ground Water Quality Concerns.................................................................................................................. 51 Data Gaps ................................................................................................................................................... 53 Future Monitoring of Water Quality Parameters .......................................................................................... 57 6. Ecology........................................................................................................................................................... 57 Plant Communities and Distributions.................................................................................................................... 57 Valley Communities.................................................................................................................................... 57 Foothill and Montane Communities............................................................................................................. 60 Sensitive Botanical Resources ..................................................................................................................... 63 Management Concerns................................................................................................................................ 65 Wildlife In The Butte Creek Watershed ................................................................................................................ 68 Wildlife Values of Past Riparian and Fresh-Water Marsh Habitats............................................................... 68 Current Status of Special Status Wildlife Populations .................................................................................. 69 Threats by Exotic Species............................................................................................................................ 74 Management Concerns................................................................................................................................ 79 Fisheries And Aquatic Resources.......................................................................................................................... 80 A Brief Historic Perspective........................................................................................................................ 80 Hydraulic Mining Impacts........................................................................................................................... 81 Historic Wetlands ....................................................................................................................................... 81 Stream Habitat Conditions........................................................................................................................... 82 Fishes of Butte Creek .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf
    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
    [Show full text]
  • Navarro Watershed Restoration Plan
    NAVARRO WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN A JOINT PROJECT OF THE MENDOCINO COUNTY WATER AGENCY THE COASTAL CONSERVANCY THE ANDERSON VALLEY LAND TRUST Prepared by: Entrix, Inc. Pacific Watershed Associates Circuit Rider Productions, Inc. The Navarro Watershed Community Advisory Group Daniel T. Sicular, Ph.D. JUNE, 1998 NAVARRO WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN Published Jointly by: ANDERSON VALLEY LAND TRUST, INCORPORATED P.O. Box 1000 Boonville, CA 95415 (707) 895-2090 CALIFORNIA STATE COASTAL CONSERVANCY 1330 Broadway Oakland, CA 94612-2530 (510) 286-1015 MENDOCINO COUNTY WATER AGENCY Courthouse Ukiah, CA 95482 (707) 463-4589 This Document is Printed on Recycled Paper TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... List of Figures........................................................................................................................ Glossary ................................................................................................................................. Acknowledgments.................................................................................................................. Executive Summary............................................................................................................... 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Basis of Need for Restoration Plan...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural and Natural History of the San Pablo Creek Watershed
    A Cultural and Natural History of the San Pablo Creek Watershed by Lisa Owens-Viani Prepared by The Watershed Project (previously known as the Aquatic Outreach Institute) Note: This booklet focuses on the watershed from the San Pablo Dam and reservoir westward (downstream). For a history of the Orinda area, see Muir Sorrick's The History of Orinda, published by the Orinda Library Board in 1970. Orinda also has an active creek stewardship group, the Friends of Orinda Creeks, which has conducted several watershed outreach efforts in local schools (see www.ci.orinda.ca.us/orindaway.htm). This booklet was written as part of the Aquatic Outreach Institute's efforts to develop stewardship of the mid- to lower watershed. The San Pablo Creek watershed is a wealthy one-rich in history, culture, and natural resources. The early native American inhabitants of the watershed drank from this deep and powerful creek and caught the steelhead that swam in its waters. They ate the tubers and roots of the plants that grew in the fertile soils deposited by the creek, and buried their artifacts, the shells and bones of the creatures they ate, and even their own dead along its banks. Later, European settlers grew fruit, grain, and vegetables in the same rich soils and watered cattle in the creek. Even today, residents of the San Pablo Creek watershed rely on the creek, perhaps unknowingly: its waters quench the thirst and meet the household needs of about 10 percent of the East Bay Municipal Utility District's customers. Some residents rely on the creek in another way, though-as a reminder that something wild and self-sufficient flows through their midst, offering respite from the surrounding urbanized landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Program Study for Department of Conservation
    Wading through the Watershed Program: An Assessment of the CalFed Statewide Watershed Program (2000-2014) January 28, 2019 Lauren Miller Kaily Bourg Jonathan Kusel Jeff Borchers Produced with support from the Department of Conservation Acknowledgements This assessment of the CalFed Statewide Watershed Program (2000-2014) is made possible by support from the California Department of Conservation (DOC). This research has benefitted greatly from contributions from a former Sierra Institute research assistant, John Owen, as well as the feedback and assistance provided by our advisory committee- Liz Mansfield, Lynn Rodriguez, Todd Sloat, and Martha Davis. A special thanks to Lauren Burton and Valerie Hurst for their mapping work. We particularly appreciate the staff at DOC for taking an active interest in this research, especially David Bunn and Bruce Gwynne, and John Lowrie for his commitment to launching the study. The entire research team extends our deepest appreciation to the many people across the state who took the time and energy to participate in this study and provide feedback on case study reports. Without your knowledge, experience, and willingness to engage, this research would not have been possible. Preface California’s watersheds and their ecosystems provide vital clean water, abundant timber resources, habitat for thousands of species, and scenic beauty for all to enjoy. These natural systems of forests, snowpack, lakes, rivers, meadows, and groundwater store and deliver critical water supplies throughout the state. Between 2000-2014, California funded local organizations to hire watershed coordinators as part of a strategy to facilitate collaborative efforts of multiple state, federal and local agencies, nonprofit organizations, and business to provide better conservation stewardship of forests and fresh waters of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2014 - 2015 Annual Report Inspiring Bay Area communities since 1997 LETTER FROM OUR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR The Watershed Thanks You! Board of Directors Jane Gire, Chair The Watershed Project has an integrative approach to addressing the issues that Scott Kocino, Treasurer affect the health of San Francisco Bay Watersheds, and is committed to Sigrid Mueller, Secretary empowering communities to appreciate and protect our local water resources. Annelise Moore Briggs Nisbet Eric Hyman Our programs work to prevent pollutants from entering bodies of water by creating Bill Walker* awareness about the sources of pollutants that impair the Bay, such as trash and Paul Amato* pesticides. We work with stake holders to eliminate sources of pollution before they Brett Foreman* reach our creeks and shorelines, and educate the public about their personal impact *Ended term during FY2014-15 on their watersheds. Staff Juliana Gonzalez Our programs also provide grassroots-driven solutions to eliminate pollutants of concern from our watersheds. We believe that greener streets are the best low cost Executive Director Martha Berthelsen strategy for healing the Bay. Limiting surface runoff through rain gardens, Public Programs Manager bioswales, tree wells, drought tolerant gardens and rain water harvesting, are Liza Dadiomov solutions that are available to all Bay Area residents and can be implemented block Education & Outreach by block to create more natural systems within our cities. Coordinator Helen Dickson The Watershed Project also supports the restoration of natural systems in our Living Shorelines Program shorelines and creeks by partnering with creek groups and stake holders to clean Manager Amelia Dotzenrod and restore the natural conditions of these natural gems.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1904
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Documents BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in Cali... Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Finding Aid Written By: Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt. Date Completed: March 2008 © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892 Microfilm: BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creators : United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 Portfolios. 6 volumes (linear feet: Approximately 75)Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1494 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Butte Basin Wildlife Area Management Plan
    UPPER BUTTE BASIN WILDLIFE AREA Final Land Management Plan Prepared for May 2012 California Wildlife Foundation Prepared by ESA, Steve Cordes (DFG), Donald Blake (DFG) r ESA _ ’LLUM __ Tina Bartlett Date Regional Manager Dan Yparraguirre Date Deputy Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 8SSHU%XWWH%DVLQ:LOGOLIH$UHD 3DJH I. Introduction I-1 $ 3XUSRVHRI$FTXLVLWLRQ ,7 % $FTXLVLWLRQ+LVWRU\ ,8 & $FTXLVLWLRQDQG5ROHRIWKH:LOGOLIH&RQVHUYDWLRQ%RDUG ,8 ' 3XUSRVHRIWKLV/DQG0DQDJHPHQW3ODQ ,9 ( 3ODQQLQJ3URFHVV ,9 ) (QYLURQPHQWDO$QDO\VLV ,10 * 5HODWLRQVKLSRIWKLV/DQG0DQDJHPHQW3ODQWR&$/)(' ,10 + 2UJDQL]DWLRQRIWKLV/DQG0DQDJHPHQW3ODQ , 11 II. Property Description and Management Setting II-1 $ *HRJUDSKLFDO6HWWLQJ ,, % &OLPDWH*HRORJ\6RLOVDQG+\GURORJ\ ,, & &XOWXUDO)HDWXUHV ,, ' (DVHPHQWVDQG5LJKWVRI:D\ ,, ( 3URSHUW\%RXQGDULHVDQG$GMDFHQW/DQG8VH ,, ) 0DQDJHPHQW6HWWLQJ ,, III. Habitat and Species Descriptions III-1 $ +DELWDW0DQDJHPHQW%DFNJURXQG ,,, % 9HJHWDWLRQ5HVRXUFHV ,,, & :LOGOLIH5HVRXUFHV ,,,4 ' )LVKHULHV5HVRXUFHV ,,,8 IV. Compatible Resource Management and Public Use IV-1 $ (YDOXDWLRQRI5HVRXUFH0DQDJHPHQWDQG3XEOLF8VH ,9 % 5HVRXUFH0DQDJHPHQW ,9 & 3XEOLF8VH ,9 ' :LOGOLIH$UHD5HJXODWLRQV ,9 ( *HQHUDO3XEOLF8VH$FWLYLWLHV ,9 ) +XQWLQJ)LUHDUPVDQG$UFKHU\(TXLSPHQWDQG3HUPLW5HTXLUHPHQWV ,9 * 6XSSRUWRI5HVRXUFH(QKDQFHPHQWDQG3XEOLF8VH ,9 + 5HJXODWLRQ$GMXVWPHQWV ,9 , 3XEOLF,QIRUPDWLRQ ,9 - &RRSHUDWLRQZLWK6WDNHKROGHUV ,9 V. Management Goals V-1 $ 'HILQLWLRQRI7HUPV8VHG,Q7KLV3ODQ 9 % *RDOVDQG7DVNVIRU(OHPHQWV 9 & (FRV\VWHPV*RDOV (* 9 ' 6SHFLHV*XLOG*RDOV 9 ( 6SHFLDO6WDWXV6SHFLHV*RDOV 9
    [Show full text]
  • M&T Chico Ranch/Llano Seco Rancho
    M&T CHICO RANCH/LLANO SECO RANCHO FISH SCREEN FACILITY SHORT-TERM PROTECTION PROJECT (SCH NO. 2012092050) DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/INITIAL STUDY Prepared for: Prepared by: 2365 Iron Point Road, Suite 300 Folsom, CA 95630 DECEMBER 2013 Page Left Blank Table of Contents M&T CHICO RANCH/LLANO SECO RANCHO FISH SCREEN FACILITY SHORT-TERM PROTECTION PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/INITIAL STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Background .............................................................................................. 1-3 1.1.1 Private Property Relying on the Pumping Facility .................................. 1-4 1.1.2 Public Lands Relying on the Pumping Facility ....................................... 1-5 1.1.3 Summary .................................................................................................. 1-5 1.2 NEPA Purpose and Need ..................................................................................... 1-8 1.3 CEQA Project Objectives .................................................................................... 1-9 1.4 Project Setting and Location .............................................................................. 1-10 1.5 Legal Authority, Permitting and Approvals ....................................................... 1-16 1.5.1 Environmental Compliance ................................................................... 1-16 1.5.2 Permitting Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Five Star and Urban Waters 2018 Grant Slate
    Five Star and Urban Waters 2018 Grant Slate NFWF CONTACTS Carrie Clingan Program Director, Community Stewardship and Youth [email protected] 202-595-2471 Chloe Elberty Coordinator, Community-Based Conservation Programs [email protected] 202-595-2434 PARTNERS • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • U.S. Forest Service • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • FedEx • Southern Company • Shell Oil Company • BNSF Railway Students help to transform a vacant lot into a conservation site in Washington, D.C. OVERVIEW The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) announced the 2018 Five Star and Urban Waters Restoration Program grant recipients. awarding 59 projects grants totaling ABOUT NFWF $2.2 million. Grantees committed an additional $5.2 million in matching contributions, for The National Fish and Wildlife a total conservation impact of $7.8 million. The goal of this grant program is to develop Foundation (NFWF) protects and community capacity to sustain local natural resources for future generations by providing restores our nation’s fish and wild- life and their habitats. Created by coastal habitat restoration. The grant program also promotes stormwater management, Congress in 1984, NFWF directs outreachmodest financial and stewardship assistance with to diverse a focus local on water partnerships quality, watersheds for wetland, and forest, the riparianhabitats and public conservation dollars to they support. Major funding is provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the the most pressing environmental U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FedEx, Southern Company, Shell Oil needs and matches those invest- Company and BNSF Railway. ments with private funds. Learn more at www.nfwf.org Riparian Restoration and Community Education at Red Mountain Park (AL) Grantee: The Red Mountain Park Fund NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS Improve streams by removing invasive plants and rubbish, and by planting native 1133 15th Street NW vegetation and installing erosion control materials at Red Mountain Park in Birmingham.
    [Show full text]
  • Feather River Regional Agricultural Water Management 2020 Update
    Feather River Regional Volume I. Agricultural Water Regional Plan Management Plan Components Byron Alan Clark, P.E. 1976-2021 Biggs-West Gridley Water District, Butte Water District, Richvale Irrigation District, Sutter Extension Water District and Western Canal Water District would like to dedicate the 2020 update of the Feather River Regional Agricultural Water Management Plan (FRRAWMP) to Byron Clark. During his too-short lifetime, Byron contributed greatly to water management in not only the Feather River region, but the entire Sacramento Valley and the state of California as a whole. The Sacramento Valley was always a special place to him. Byron’s connection to the valley began in his youth as he grew up in the small farming town of Willows, California, and it continued throughout his life, both professionally and personally. Byron became an Eagle Scout, was Valedictorian of the Willow’s High School class of 1994, and graduated from UC Davis with a degree in Biosystems Engineering. As an engineer, Byron maintained an incredibly high standard of work. He was able to focus in on technical details while also maintaining a clear vision of the big picture and why each project or task was important. He was always dedicated to thoughtful data analysis and dissemination, helping clients and the community in making sound resource management decisions. He had an unmistakable passion for his work, and his leadership in agricultural water management will be missed. As a person, Byron was a warm, generous, and thoughtful man. He was appreciative and thankful of others, noting their unique skills and contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2019 Annual Report
    2019 JULY 2018 - JUNE 2019 Committed The Watershed Project to inspiring Bay Area Annual Report 2019 communities to understand, appreciate and protect local watersheds. Dear Friends, Thank you for being a part of this inspiring commu- where we have retained four young adults for two to Contents nity of watershed stewards – of volunteers, students, three years, giving them the chance to hold a 20-hours teachers, partners and leaders. We are so grateful. Over a week part-time job in the environmental sector while Watershed Education the years, you have played a key role in building The completing their college educations. We also had a Board of Directors Consultants Developing the next generation of watershed stewards with nature Watershed Project into a trusted local powerhouse for team of high school interns from the West Contra 3 Jane Gire, Chair Alto Ayhan environmental education, urban greening, climate resil- Costa Unified School District that were employed based STEM education programs. Eric Hyman, Treasurer Joseph Clerici iency, and shoreline stewardship for the San Francisco during the summer months shadowing the Green Sigrid Mueller, Secretary Leda Shulak Bay Watershed. Collar Corps Team while they cared for green infra- Healthy Watersheds Dan Abbott, Secretary Jeanine Strickland structure and helped canvas neighbors for the Rheem Preventing pollution from entering the watershed trough marine debris Annelise Moore This year, as with many years in the past, we mobilized Creek flooding survey project. This is on top of the 5 education, trash cleanups, and inspiring behavioral change. Scott Cocino Green Collar Corps more than 3,000 watershed stewardship volunteers to 1,424 K-12 students who took part in our environ- Patty Liao Sara Gurdian mental education programs and explored in their Nancy Hamil Calvin Abbott clean, weed, replant, and restore creeks, shorelines, Wild Shorelines and other green spaces here in our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Salmon and Steelhead: the Struggle to Restore an Imperiled Resource
    Preferred Citation: Lufkin, Alan, editor. California's Salmon and Steelhead: The Struggle to Restore an Imperiled Resource. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1991. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft209nb0qn/ California's Salmon and Steelhead The Struggle to Restore an Imperiled Resource Edited by Alan Lufkin UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford © 1990 The Regents of the University of California California's Salmon and Steelhead FOREWORD ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PREFACE • Organization of the Book • Outline of Salmon Biology • A Note on Nomenclature PART ONE— HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES Chapter One— Historical Highlights • Early Indian Fishery Immigrants Take Control • Commercial Beginnings • Hydraulic Mining Effects • Early Restoration Efforts Salmon and Water Interests • The Central Valley Project (CVP) • The State's Role The Postwar Period • The Good News and the Bad • The Red Bluff Diversion Dam Citizen Action Begins • The First Advisory Committee. • The Upper Sacramento Committee. • Current Indian Fishery Issues • Results • Too Much Help? • Recent Citizens' Actions • Klamath Management Zone Problems Water Issues • SWRCB Bay/Delta Salinity Plan Development • Renewal of Friant Water Contracts • Asian Driftnet Concerns • A Future in Doubt Chapter Two— The Klamath River Fishery: Early History • Precontact Era • Postcontact Era • Chapter Three— North Coast Salmon and Steelhead and Their Habitat (1) Chapter Four— The Passing of the Salmon • Epilogue Chapter Five— Remember the San Joaquin • Epilogue PART TWO— CURRENT
    [Show full text]