Arxiv:0909.2335V1 [Nucl-Th] 12 Sep 2009 Omfcos(Ffs), Factors Transition Are Charge Form and Couplings Magnetic, Electric, These by Described Electroproduction

Home , Roper resonance

arXiv:0909.2335v1 [nucl-th] 12 Sep 2009 omfcos(FFs), factors transition are charge form and couplings magnetic, electric, These by described electroproduction. and photo- program. rb iercmiain hro shlct ampli- helicity as thereof tudes combinations linear by or aesm esnbekoldeo h rnvream- plitudes transverse the of knowledge reasonable some have lybod n the and broad, ally euiul eemnd eas tle ls othe to close lies it ηN because determined, uniquely be iinlifraincnb bandfrteelec- the for obtained (e.m.) be tromagnetic can information ditional oedutaottesrcueo w rmnn res- Roper prominent the two of onances, structure the remains about there doubt particular, some resonances, In four-star exceptions. few the only with for parameters reliable are n aisit the branch- into and widths, ratios masses, ing analyses resonance such the From know we techniques. extraction Breit-Wigner both pole with and process this the of in analyses wave listed resonances Tables the Data pion- Particle All elastic by scattering. provided nucleon originally was nucleon the Introduction 1 fMdr hsc fteCieeAaeyo cecsadIPP IOP and Sciences of Academy Chinese the of Physics Modern of P(E P,2009, NP), & CPC(HEP

)Emi:[email protected] E-mail: 1) c ∗ ntebsso hs eaieyfimgons ad- grounds, firm relatively these of basis the On u nweg bu h xiainsetu of spectrum excitation the about knowledge Our 09CieePyia oit n h nttt fHg Ener High of Institute the and Society Physical Chinese 2009 upre yteDush oshnseencatthrough Forschungsgemeinschaft Deutsche the by Supported threshold. Q S uto.Temdlcnan l orsa eoacsi the in resonances four-star all contains model The duction. Abstract ie o h oe,teS1adD3resonances. D13 words and t Key S11 empirical the obtain Roper, to the used for be given can us factors be form can transition that the parameterizations numerical convenient give ntenurn also neutron, the on PACS 11 2 A (1650), eedn rniinfr atr ol eotie o the for obtained be could factors form transition dependent 1 A / 2 1 ( / Q 2 42.k 33.g 13.75.Gx 13.30.Eg, 14.20.Gk, Bgluo aoaoyfrTertclPyis IR Du JINR, Physics, Theoretical for Laboratory (Bogoliubov 2 and 2 ), D aynRsnneAayi rmMAID from Analysis Resonance Baryon h ntr sbrmdlMI20 a enue oaayeth analyze to used been has MAID2007 model isobar unitary The 15 A inpoo n lcrpouto,nnsrnebros t baryons, non-strange electroproduction, and photo- pion A (1675), 3 3 / S P / [1] πN 2 G 11 2 γNN ( 11 .Tiator L. Q E ∗ ttera htnpit which point, photon real the at aebe dnie ypartial- by identified been have 13) hr h oecnnot can pole the where (1535), 33 14) hc per unusu- appears which (1440), ( Isiu ¨rKrpyi,Uiesta an,D509M D-55099 Universität für Mainz, Kernphysik, (Institut 1 Q 2 Q and ,and ), X:1—8 (X): F 2 2 15 ∗ eedn eto omfcosaeotie.Fraltransi all For obtained. are factors form neutron dependent ), 18)and (1680) opig hog pion through couplings ππN G 1) M ∗ S ( 1 / Q .Drechsel D. 2 hnes These channels. ( 2 Q ,and ), 2 P .S a we far So ). 13 12) rmtecmlt ol aabs,icuigalso including base, data world complete the From (1720). G hns hsc C Physics Chinese C ∗ 1) ( Q ..Kamalov S.S. 2 ), h F 4 n ytejitRsinGra Heisenberg-Land Russian-German joint the by and 443 SFB the yPyiso h hns cdm fSine n h Institu the and Sciences of Academy Chinese the of Physics gy bihn Ltd ublishing rniinfr atr,frtenurntre epa- we target the neutron rameterized the for factors, form transition rmeprmn,alwu ompottequark the out map to us allow experiment, from al- base data world the from data lows. existing the as far etwsdn nHl ih1 noaie and unpolarized 16 with at A observables experi- Hall polarization complete in recoil almost done an was even ment po- and electrons, target polarized larized with performed were ∆(1232) the region in addi- especially experiments, In some coverage. also tion, angle azimuthal large with experiments in accessible are and which longitudinal polarizations transverse carries po- photon always virtual use electroproduction the not but in did freedom, experiments of degrees these larization of Most proton. ecudoti ohsingle- both obtain could we resonances four-star 13 below all for obtained factors have form and transition data electroproduction the alyzed eaeb h xeiet tJa,weeelectro- where JLab, at of experiments production the by decade n ni eetypatclynnxsetfrtelon- the amplitudes for gitudinal nonexistent practically recently until and r auae ntePril aaTbe.Frfinite For Tables. Data Particle Q the in tabulated are 2 di te ecin.Frhroe eso how show we Furthermore, reactions. other in ed ases hredniisadorfis eut are results first our and densities charge ransverse einbelow region utemr,tepeieem Fdt,extracted data, FF e.m. precise the Furthermore, ihoruiayioa oe ADw aean- have we MAID model isobar unitary our With i tpfradwsdn uigtelast the during done was forward step big A h nomto on nteltrtr sscarce is literature the in found information the et,Roper, Delta, W 2) n,118 ocwRgo,Russia) Region, Moscow 141980 bna, e.Frtepoo agti otcases most in target proton the For GeV. 2 = .Vanderhaeghen M. asto omfactors form ransition π W 0 iz Germany) ainz, Q and e n ohsingle- both and GeV 2 = D 2 eetdt fpo electropro- pion of data recent e 13 eednei ipe omas form simpler a in dependence S (1520), π 1 + / 2 infr atr ealso we factors form tion aebe esrdo the on measured been have . S o.3,N.X x,2009 Xxx, X, No. 33, Vol. 1) 11 Q (1535), 2 Q and 2 * 1 = Q S . 31 GeV 0 2 π -dependent Q (1620), − 2 data and 2 . au te No. X L. Tiator et al: Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID 2 charge densities in a baryon. It was shown possible to in the appropriate energy regions. In the latest ver- define a proper density interpretation of the form fac- sion, MAID2007, the S, P , D and F waves of the tor data by viewing the baryon in a light-front frame. background contributions are unitarized as explained This yields information on the spatial distribution of above, where the pion-nucleon elastic scattering am- the quark charge in the plane transverse to the line- plitudes, tα = [η exp(2iδ ) 1]/2i, are described by πN α α − of-sight. In this way, the quark transverse charge den- the phase shifts δα and the inelasticity parameters ηα sities were mapped out in the nucleon[2, 3], and in the taken from the GWU/SAID analysis[7]. deuteron[4] based on empirical FF data. To under- For the resonance contributions we follow Ref.[8] stand the e.m. structure of a nucleon resonance, it and assume Breit-Wigner forms for the resonance is of interest to use the precise transition FF data to shape, reveal the spatial distribution of the quark charges tR,α(W,Q2)= that induce such a transition. In this way, using the γπ ∗ f (W )Γ M f (W ) empirical information on the N N transition form ¯R(W,Q2) γN tot R πN eiφR , (3) →[5] α 2 2 factors from the MAID analysis , the N ∆(1232) A MR W iMR Γtot → − − transition charge densities have been mapped out in where fπN is the usual Breit-Wigner factor describing ∗ Ref.[3] and the N N (1440) in Ref.[6]. In this work, the decay of a resonance R with total width Γ (W ) → tot we will extend this method to map out the quark tran- and physical mass MR. The expressions for fγN ,fπN sition charge densities inducing the N S11(1535) and Γ are given in Ref.[8]. The phase φ (W ) → tot R and N D13(1520) e.m. excitations. in Eq. (3) is introduced to adjust the total phase → such that the Fermi-Watson theorem is fulfilled be- 2 The MAID ansatz low two-pion threshold. For the S- and P -wave multipoles we extend this unitarization procedure up to In the spirit of a dynamical approach to pion W = 1400 MeV. Because of a lack of further infor- photo- and electroproduction, the T-matrix of the mation, we assume that the phases φR are constant unitary isobar model is set up with the following at the higher energies. In particular we note that ansatz the phase φR for the P33(1232) excitation vanishes at 2 B R W = MR = 1232 MeV for all values of Q . For this tγπ(W )= tγπ (W )+tγπ (W ) (1) multipole we may even apply the Fermi-Watson the- of a background and a resonance T-matrix, where orem up to W 1600 MeV because the inelasticity each of them is individually unitary. This is a very ≈ parameter ηα remains close to 1. For the D- and F - important starting point that will allow us later to wave resonances, the phases φR are assumed to be clearly separate resonance and background ampli- constant and determined from the best fit. tudes within a Breit-Wigner concept. While in the original version of MAID only For a specific partial wave the background T- the 7 most important nucleon resonances were in- matrix is set-up by a potential multiplied by pion cluded with mostly only transverse e.m. cou- nucleon scattering amplitudes in accordance with the plings, in our new version all 13 four-star reso- K-matrix approximation, nances below W = 2 GeV are included. These

B,α 2 B,α 2 α are P33(1232), P11(1440), D13(1520), S11(1535), tγπ (W,Q )= vγπ (W,Q )[1+itπN (W )], (2) S31(1620), S11(1650), D15(1675), F15(1680), where only the on-shell part of the pion nucleon D33(1700), P13(1720), F35(1905), P31(1910) and rescattering is maintained and the off-shell part from F37(1950). pion loop contributions is neglected. At threshold it is well known that this is a bad approximation for 3 Transition form factors γ,π0 production, however in the resonance region it is well justified as the main contribution from pion loop The resonance couplings ¯R(W,Q2) in most cases Aα effects is absorbed by the nucleon resonance dressing. are independent of the total energy and depend B,α 2 2 The background potential vγπ (W,Q ) is de- only on Q . A typical energy dependence occurs in scribed by Born terms obtained with an energy de- MAID2007 e.g. for the ∆(1232) resonance in terms pendent mixing of pseudovector-pseudoscalar πNN of the virtual photon three-momentum k(W,Q2). For coupling and t-channel vector meson exchanges. The all other resonances which are discussed here, how- mixing parameters and coupling constants were de- ever, we can assume a simple Q2 dependence, ¯ (Q2). Aα termined from an analysis of nonresonant multipoles They can be taken as constants in a single-Q2 anal- No. X L. Tiator et al: Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID 3 ysis, e.g. in photoproduction, where Q2 = 0 but also in requirements from low energy theorems in the long at any fixed Q2, where enough data with W and θ wavelength limit, details are discussed in Ref.[5]. variation is available, see Table 1. Alternatively they Table 1. Database of pion electroproduction 2 can also be parameterized as functions of Q in an for energies above the ∆ resonance up to W = ansatz like 1.7 GeV, used in our single-Q2 transition form − 2 factor analysis. ¯ (Q2)= ¯ (0)(1+a Q2 +a Q4 +a Q8)e b1Q . (4) Aα Aα 1 2 3 Q2 GeV 2 With such an ansatz it is possible to determine the Reference year reaction ( ) Joo et al.[9] 2002 pπ0 0.4−1.8 parameters ¯α(0) from a fit to the world database of A Joo et al.[10] 2004 nπ+ 0.4−0.65 photoproduction, while the parameters ai and b1 can Laveissiere et al.[11] 2004 pπ0 1.0 be obtained from a combined fitting of all electropro- Egiyan et al.[12] 2006 nπ+ 0.3−0.6 duction data at different Q2. The latter procedure we Ungaro et al.[13] 2006 pπ0 3.0−6.0 call the ‘superglobal fit’. In MAID the photon cou- Park et al.[14] 2008 nπ+ 1.7−4.5 plings ¯ are direct input parameters. They are di- Aα rectly related to the helicity couplings A1/2,A3/2 and For all other resonances the parameters are listed + S1/2 of nucleon resonance excitation. For further de- in the three tables. Due to the 2008 π data that tails see Ref.[5]. have been recently included in our database, we find In Tables 2,3 and 4 we give the numerical values differences compared to our MAID2007 parametriza- of the parameters for our Q2 dependent, ‘superglobal tion for the following 6 proton transition form fac-

ﬁts’. Our parametrization of the ∆(1232) form factors to P11(1440), D13(1520), D33(1440), D15(1675), tors are more complicated, in particular due to build- F15(1680) and P13(1720).

Table 2. New parameterizations of our transition form factors, Eq. (4), for proton targets.

∗ ∗ −3 −1/2 −2 −4 −8 −2 N , ∆ A¯α(0) (10 GeV ) a1 (GeV ) a2 (GeV ) a3 (GeV ) b1 (GeV )

P11(1440)p A1/2 −61.4 0.871 −3.516 −0.158 1.36

S1/2 4.2 40. 0 1.50 1.75

D13(1520)p A1/2 −27.4 8.580 −0.252 0.357 1.20

A3/2 160.6 −0.820 0.541 −0.016 1.06

S1/2 −63.5 4.19 0 0 3.40

D15(1675)p A1/2 15.3 0.10 0 0 2.00

A3/2 21.6 1.91 0.18 0 0.69

S1/2 1.1 0 0 02.00

F15(1680)p A1/2 −25.1 3.780 −0.292 0.080 1.25

A3/2 134.3 1.016 0.222 0.237 2.41

S1/2 −44.0 3.783 0 0 1.85

D33(1700) A1/2 226. 1.91 0 0 1.77

A3/2 210. 0.88 1.71 0 2.02

S1/2 2.1 0 0 02.00

P13(1720)p A1/2 73.0 1.89 0 0 1.55

A3/2 −11.5 10.83 −0.66 0 0.43

S1/2 −53.0 2.46 0 0 1.55

Above the third resonance region there is an en- role is to deﬁne a global high-energy behavior that is ergy gap between 1800 1900 MeV, where no four-star needed for applications with dispersion relations and − resonance can be found. Beyond this gap and up to sum rules. Future experiments in this region will give

2 GeV three more four-star resonances, F35(1905), us the necessary information to map out these form

P31(1910) and F37(1950) are reported by the PDG, factors in more details. which are also included in MAID. In electroproduction nothing is practically known about these states and we have just introduced their reported photon couplings, multiplied with a simple gaussian form factor, exp( 2.0Q2/GeV 2). In MAID their main − No. X L. Tiator et al: Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID 4

Table 3. Maid2007 parameterizations, Eq. (4), with the standard dipole form factor GD. The electric for proton targets (a2 = a3 = 0). and Coulomb form factors are much smaller and are usually given as ratios to the magnetic form factor. N ∗, ∗ A¯ a b ∆ α(0) 1 1 While there is agreement between diﬀerent analyses S (1535)p A 66.4 1.608 0.70 11 1/2 on the E/M ratio, which is practically constant at a S −2.0 23.9 0.81 1/2 few percent with a negative sign the S/M ratio is also S (1620) A 65.6 1.86 2.50 31 1/2 negative, but reaches large magnitudes of around 25% S 16.2 2.83 2.00 1/2 at the Q2 6 GeV2 in the JLab analysis, whereas in S11(1650)p A1/2 33.3 1.45 0.62 ≈ the MAID analysis the magnitude is only around 10% S1/2 −3.5 2.88 0.76 with an asymptotically almost zero slope as predicted in calculations by Buchmann[15] and Ji et al.[16].

3.2 Second Resonance Region Table 4. Same as Table 3 for neutron targets. Above the two-pion threshold, we can no longer ∗ A¯ N α(0) a1 b1 apply the two-channel unitarity and consequently the P11(1440)n A1/2 54.1 0.95 1.77 Watson theorem does not hold anymore. Therefore, − S1/2 41.5 2.98 1.55 the background amplitude of the partial waves does − − D13(1520)n A1/2 76.5 0.53 1.55 not vanish at resonance as this was the case for the A − . . . 3/2 154 0 58 1 75 ∆(1232) resonance. As an immediate consequence S 13.6 15.7 1.57 1/2 the resonance-background separation becomes model- S (1535)n A −50.7 4.75 1.69 11 1/2 dependent. In MAID2007 we choose to separate the S 28.5 0.36 1.55 1/2 background and resonance contributions according to S11(1650)n A1/2 9.3 0.13 1.55 the K-matrix approximation, Eqs. (2,3). Further- S1/2 10. −0.50 1.55 more, we recall that the absolute values of the he- D15(1675)n A1/2 −61.7 0.01 2.00 licity amplitudes are correlated with the values used A3/2 −83.7 0.01 2.00 for the total resonance width Γ and the single-pion S1/2 0 0 0 R

F15(1680)n A1/2 27.9 0 1.20 branching ratio βπ, giving rise to additional uncer-

A3/2 −38.4 4.09 1.75 tainties from these hadronic resonance parameters.

S1/2 0 0 0 On the experimental side, the data at the higher en-

P13(1720)n A1/2 −2.9 12.70 1.55 ergies are no longer as abundant as in the ∆ region.

A3/2 −31.0 5.00 1.55 However, the large data set recently obtained mainly

S1/2 0 0 0 by the CLAS collaboration (see Table 1) enabled us to determine the transverse and longitudinal helicity couplings as functions of Q2 for all the four-star resonances below 1800 MeV. These data are available in the kinematical region of 1100 MeV

The ∆(1232)P33 is the only nucleon resonance The helicity amplitudes for the Roper resonance with a well-deﬁned Breit-Wigner resonance position, P11(1440) are shown in Fig. 1. Our latest super-

MR = 1232 MeV, because it is an ideal single-channel global solution (solid lines) is in reasonable agree- resonance, where the Breit-Wigner position is iden- ment with the single-Q2 analysis. The ﬁgure shows tical to the K-matrix pole position. Therefore, and a zero crossing of the transverse helicity amplitude due to the Watson theorem, the Nucleon to ∆(1232) at Q2 0.7 GeV2 and a maximum at the relatively ≈ transition is the only case, where we can obtain the large momentum transfer Q2 2.0 GeV2. The longi- ≈ form factors in a practically model independent way. tudinal Roper excitation rises to large values around Results for the ∆(1232) transitions have been dis- Q2 0.5 GeV2 and in fact produces one of the ≈ cussed very often in recent years. The magnetic form strongest longitudinal amplitude we can ﬁnd in our factor is very well known up to high momentum trans- analysis. This answers the question raised by Li and [17] fer of Q2 = 10 GeV2 and can be parameterized in a Burkert whether the Roper resonance is a radi- surprisingly simple form ally excited 3-quark state or a quark-gluon hybrid, because in the latter case the longitudinal coupling 2 2 ∗ 2 2 −0.21Q /GeV GM (Q )=3GD(Q )e (5) should vanish completely. No. X L. Tiator et al: Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID 5

D13(1520) resonance, see Fig. 3. Also for this resonance the JLab partial wave analysis of 2008 agrees well with the MAID analysis for most cases, however

a signiﬁcant deviation remains for A1/2 in the region of Q2 = 2 GeV2.

Fig. 1. Transverse and longitudinal form fac-

tors of the P11(1440) Roper resonance. The red circles are the MAID analysis of 2007[5] and 2008, and the black triangles are the 2008 JLab analysis[18]. The data point of the transverse form factor at Q2 =0 is the PDG value[1].

Fig. 2 shows our results for the S11(1535) resonance. The red single-Q2 data points show our 2007 analysis, while the black triangles are the 2008 analysis of Ref.[18]. Our Q2 dependent analysis describes all data points quite well, except for the longitudinal form factor in the region around Q2 = 2 GeV2. Fig. 3. Transverse and longitudinal form fac-

tors of the D13(1520) resonance. Notation as in Fig. 1.

3.3 Third Resonance Region

The S31(1620) is rather weakly excited by the elec-

tromagnetic probe. The PDG A1/2 value at the photon point is only (27 11) 10−3 GeV−1/2 and below ± · Q2 = 2 GeV2 we obtain similar values, at higher Q2 it is consistent with zero, same as for the longitudinal

form factor S1/2.

Fig. 2. Transverse and longitudinal form fac-

tors of the S11(1535) resonance. Notation as in Fig. 1.

While the inclusion of the 2008 Park π+ data[14] Fig. 4. Transverse form factors of the S (1650) did not modify our 2007 solution for the S res- 11 11 resonance. Notation as in Fig. 1. onance, we ﬁnd some signiﬁcant deviations for the No. X L. Tiator et al: Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID 6

Also for the second S11 resonance the longitudinal dominantly helicity 3/2 transitions, whereas the A1/2 coupling is practically zero, but for the transverse transition is consistent with zero. As for the ∆(1232) form factor we ﬁnd a solution shown in Fig. 4, which these are further examples for which the pQCD pre- has the same shape as the ﬁrst S11 resonance. diction for helicity conservation does not hold in the 2 2 A similar situation as for the D13 resonance we Q region below 5 GeV . obtain for the F15(1680), shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 6. Transverse form factor of the D15(1675) resonance. Notation as in Fig. 1.

Fig. 7. Transverse form factor of the P13(1720) resonance. Notation as in Fig. 1.

4 Empirical transverse charge transi- Fig. 5. Transverse and longitudinal form fac- tion densities tors of the F15(1680) resonance. Notation as in Fig. 1. In the following, we will consider the e.m. N → N ∗ transition when viewed from a light front mov- For both resonances the helicity non-conserving am- ing towards the baryon. Equivalently, this corre- plitude A3/2 dominates for real photons and with in- sponds with a frame where the baryons have a large 2 creasing values of Q , A3/2 drops faster than the he- momentum-component along the z-axis chosen along ′ ′ licity conserving amplitude A1/2. As a consequence the direction of P = (p + p )/2, where p (p ) are the asymmetry the initial (final) baryon four-momenta. We indicate + 2 2 the baryon light-front + component by P (defining A1/2 A3/2 2 ± 0 3 (Q )= | |2 − | |2 (6) a a a ). We can furthermore choose a symmet- A A1/2 + A3/2 ≡ ± | | | | ric frame where the virtual photon four-momentum changes rapidly from values close to 1 to values near q has q+ = 0, and has a transverse component (ly- − +1 over a small Q2 range. As a comparison, the asym- ing in the xy-plane) indicated by the transverse vec- 2 2 2 metry for the ∆(1232) resonance is practically con- tor ~q⊥, satisfying q = ~q Q . In such a sym- A − ⊥ ≡− stant over this Q2 range with a value 0.5. This metric frame, the virtual photon only couples to for- ≈− again shows the special role of the ∆ resonance, where ward moving partons and the + component of the the helicity conservation is not observed. electromagnetic current J + has the interpretation of Finally, in Figs. 6 and 7 we show the situation for the quark charge density operator. It is given by the D (1675) and P (1720) resonances, both with- J +(0) = +2/3¯u(0)γ+u(0) 1/3d¯(0)γ+d(0), consider- 15 13 − out a significant longitudinal coupling. Unlike the ing only u and d quarks. Each term in the expression situation discussed before, these two resonances have is a positive operator sinceqγ ¯ +q γ+q 2. ∝ | | No. X L. Tiator et al: Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID 7

We deﬁne a transition charge density for the un- 1.5 1.5 ∗ polarized N N transition by the Fourier transform 1 1 → 0.5 0.5 ∗ 2 D D d ~q⊥ − ⊥·~ 1 NN ~ i ~q b fm fm @ 0 @ 0 ρ0 (b) 2 e + Z y y ≡ (2π) 2P × b b -0.5 -0.5 + ~q⊥ + + ~q⊥ P , ,λ J (0) P , ,λ , (7) -1 -1 h 2 | | − 2 i -1.5 -1.5 where λ denotes the nucleon and N ∗ light-front he- -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 bx @ fmD bx @ fmD licities, ~q⊥ = Q(cosφq eˆx + sinφq eˆy), and where the ~ 2-dimensional vector b denotes the position (in the Fig. 8. Quark transverse charge density corre- c.m. xy-plane) from the transverse of the baryons. sponding to the p → P11(1440) e.m. transi- First we will consider the case of j = 1/2 reso- tion. Left panel: When p and N ∗ are unpo- ∗ pN ∗ nances, as P11 and S11. These cases are very similar larized (ρ ). Right panel: When p and N 0 ∗ pN to the nucleon and can be worked out in an analogous are polarized along the x-axis (ρT ). The way. The Fourier transform in Eq. (7) leads to light (dark) regions correspond with positive → ∞ (negative) densities. For the p P11(1440) ∗ ∗ NN ~ dQ NN 2 e.m. transition FFs, we use the improved ρ0 (b)= QJ0(bQ)F1 (Q ), (8) Z0 2π MAID2008 ﬁt of this work. where Jn denotes the cylindrical Bessel function of ∗ order n. Note that ρNN only depends on b = ~b . In Fig. 8 we show the results for the N 0 | | → It has the interpretation of the quark (transition) P11(1440) transition charge densities both for the un- charge density in the transverse plane which induces polarized case and for the case of transverse polar- the N N ∗ excitation. ization in for the proton and in Fig. 9 for the neu- → The above unpolarized transition charge density tron. We use the empirical information on the N → involves only one of the two independent N N ∗ N ∗(1440) transition FFs as given in our parametriza- → e.m. form factors. To extract the information en- tion of this work. ∗ NN coded in F2 , we consider the transition charge It is seen that for the transition on a proton, which densities for a transversely polarized N and N ∗. is well constrained by data, there is an inner region We denote this transverse polarization direction by of positive quark charge concentrated within 0.5 fm,

S~⊥ =cosφS eˆx+sinφS eˆy. The transverse spin state can accompanied by a relatively broad band of negative be expressed in terms of the light front helicity spinor charge extending out to about 1 fm. 1 1 iφS 1 states as s⊥ =+ = λ =+ +e λ = /√2, | 2 i | 2 i | − 2 i 1.5 1.5 with s⊥ the nucleon spin projection along the direc- 1 1 tion of S~⊥. 0.5 0.5 We can then deﬁne a transition charge density for D D fm fm ∗ @ 0 @ 0 y y

a transversely polarized N and N , both along the b b -0.5 -0.5 direction of S~⊥ as -1 -1

∗ 2 NN d ~q⊥ −i ~q⊥·~b 1 -1.5 -1.5 ~ ------ρT (b) 2 e + 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 ≡ Z (2π) 2P × bx @ fmD bx @ fmD

+ ~q⊥ ′ + + ~q⊥ P , ,s⊥ J (0) P , ,s⊥ . (9) h 2 | | − 2 i Fig. 9. Quark transverse charge density corre-

sponding to the n → P11(1440) e.m. transi- Using Eq. (8), the Fourier transform of Eq. (9) can ∗ ′ tion. Left panel: When n and N are unpo- ∗ be worked out for the case s⊥ = s⊥ as nN ∗ larized (ρ0 ). Right panel: When n and N ∗ ∗ ∗ NN NN nN ~ are polarized along the x-axis (ρT ). The ρT (b)= ρ0 (b)+sin(φb φS ) ∞ − × 2 ∗ light (dark) regions correspond with positive dQ Q NN 2 J1(bQ)F (Q ), (10) (negative) densities. For the n → P (1440) Z 2π (M ∗ +M ) 2 11 0 N e.m. transition FFs, we use the MAID2007 where the second term, which describes the deviation fit. from the circular symmetric unpolarized charge den- ~ sity, depends on the orientation of b = b(cosφbeˆx + When polarizing the baryon in the transverse plane, sinφbeˆy). In the following we choose the transverse the large value of the magnetic transition strength spin along the x-axis (φS = 0). at the real photon point, yields a sizeable shift of No. X L. Tiator et al: Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID 8 the charge distribution, inducing an electric dipole The unpolarized density is similar to the Roper with, moment. For the neutron, which is not very well however, more diffuse boundaries between up and constrained by data, the MAID2007 analysis yields down quarks. In addition to the dipole transition charge distributions of opposite sign compared to the density, in this case we also get a quadrupole density proton, with active quarks spreading out over even which is shown in the second panel. larger spatial distances. Fig. 10 shows the unpolarized and polarized 5 Summary and Conclusions transition charge densities from the proton to the S11(1535) resonance. It can be compared to the cor- Using the world data base of pion photo- and elec- responding Fig. 8 for the Roper. The up quarks are troproduction and recent data from Mainz, Bonn, not so strongly localized and also the ring of down Bates and JLab we have made a first attempt to quarks is less pronounced, in particular for the den- ∗ extract all longitudinal and transverse helicity am- NN sity corresponding to F2 in the second panel. plitudes of nucleon resonance excitation for four-star resonances below W = 2 GeV. For this purpose we have extended our unitary isobar model MAID and have parameterized the Q2 dependence of the transition amplitudes. Comparisons between single-Q2 fits and a Q2 dependent superglobal fit give us con- fidence in the determination of the helicity couplings

of the P33(1232),P11(1440),S11(1535),D13(1520) and

the F15(1680) resonances, even though the model un- Fig. 10. Quark transverse charge density cor- certainty of these amplitudes can be as large as 50% → responding to the p S11(1535) e.m. tran- for the longitudinal amplitudes of the D13 and F15. sition. Left panel: When p and S11 are in a These form factors were used to extract the quark pS11 light-front helicity +1/2 state (ρ0 ). Right transverse charge densities inducing these transitions. panel: When p and S11 are polarized along the The rings of up and down quarks in these two- pS11 x-axis with opposite spin projections (ρT ), ′ dimensional representations show very diﬀerent struc- i.e. s⊥ = −s⊥ = +1/2. The light (dark) re- tures for the Roper, the S and the D resonances. gions correspond with positive (negative) den- 11 13

sities. For the p → S11(1535) e.m. transition References FFs, we use the MAID2007 ﬁt. 1 AMSLER C et al. [Review of Particle Physics] Phys. Lett. Finally, in Fig. 11 we show two transition densities B, 2008, 667: 1; http://pdg.lbl.gov/. 2 MILLER G A Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 99: 112001. from the proton to the D13(1520) resonance. Similar 3 CARLSON C E, VANDERHAEGHEN M Phys. Rev. Lett., to the N∆(1232) transition, also here we have 3 FFs 2008, 100: 032004. leading to 3 densities. 4 CARLSON C E, VANDERHAEGHEN M arXiv:0807.4537 [hep-ph]. 5 DRECHSEL D, KAMALOV S S, TIATOR L Eur. Phys. J. A, 2007, 34: 69. 6 TIATOR L, VANDERHAEGHEN M Phys. Lett. B, 2009, 672: 344. 7 ARNDT R A, STRAKOVSKY I I, WORKMAN R L Phys. Rev. C, 1996, 53: 430; (SP99 solution of the GW/SAID analysis). 8 DRECHSEL D, HANSTEIN O, KAMALOV S S, TIATOR L Nucl. Phys. A, 1999, 645: 145; Fig. 11. Quark transverse charge density cor- http://www.kph.uni-mainz.de/MAID/. 9 JOO K et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, 88: 122001-1. responding to the p → D13(1520) e.m. tran- 10 JOO K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 70: 042201. sition. Left panel: When p and D13 are in a 11 LAVEISSIERE G et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2004, 69: 045202. pD13 light-front helicity +1/2 state (ρ0 ). Right 12 EGIYAN H et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2006, 73: 025204. panel: When p and D13 are polarized along 13 UNGARO M et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 97: 112003. pD13 77 the x-axis with spin projections (ρT ) as in 14 PARK K et al. Phys. Rev. C, 2008, : 015208. Fig. 10. The light (dark) regions correspond 15 BUCHMANN A J Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 93: 212301-1. 90 with positive (negative) densities. For the 16 JI X D, MA J P, YUAN F Phys. Rev. Lett., 2003, : 241601. p → D (1520) e.m. transition FFs, we use 13 17 LI Z P, BURKERT V, LI Z J Phys. Rev. D, 1992, 46: 70. the improved MAID2008 ﬁt of this work. 18 AZNAURYAN I G et al. [CLAS Collaboration] Phys. Rev. C, 2008, 78: 045209; and private communication.