DOCSLIB.ORG

The State Border Between Latvia and Russia Shall Extend

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The State Border Between Latvia and Russia Shall Extend INFORMATION NOTE BORDER TREATY BETWEEN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA 8 June 2006 DG External Policies Delegations Europe EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Russia and Latvia started the border negotiations just after Latvia’s independence in 1991. In 1997 the two countries completed their negotiations on the state border. Moscow and Riga had been expected to sign the treaty on 10 May 2005 but Russia refused to sign after the government of Latvia had adopted a unilateral explanatory declaration. The declaration made a reference to the Peace Treaty between Latvia and Russia of 11 August 1920, which was considered as territorial claims by the Russian side. According to the Peace Treaty, the Jaunlatgale/Abrene district (now Pytalovo district of Pskov Oblast of the Russian Federation) belonged to the Republic of Latvia, and became part of Russia (RSFSR) in 1944. Latvian government claimed that the Constitution of Latvia does not allow it to sign the prepared border treaty in any other way than by adopting the unilateral declaration (according to Article 1 of the Latvian Constitution the Abrene/Pytalovo district is part of Latvia). On 29 April 2005 Latvian Prime Minister Aigars Kalvitis stated that the declaration approved by the government did not present any territorial claims against Russia and that Latvia would respect the borders defined by the prepared and initialled treaty. At the EU/Russia Summit on 10 May 2005 Russian President Vladimir Putin called on the Latvian side to “stop political demagogy and begin constructive work.” 8 June 2006 2 DG External Policies Delegations Europe Border negotiations between Russia and Latvia started just after Latvia regained its independence. The two sides had different positions. Latvia wished to gain “historic justice” with recognition of the fact of Soviet occupation and its statehood continuity with the pre-war Republic of Latvia, which Russia could hardly accept. In 1997, Russia and Latvia completed the negotiations on the state border between the two countries. However, the signing of the treaty was postponed due to a variety of reasons, including Latvia's EU and NATO aspirations. The treaty on the state border between the Republic of Latvia and the Russian Federation confirms the existing border between Russia and Latvia that is along the administrative border between the former Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and the former Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic. The two countries had been expected to sign the treaty on 10 May 2005 in Moscow. Russia refused to sign as the government of Latvia unilaterally adopted an explanatory declaration. The Latvian side insisted on numerous occasions that the only issue was the recognition of the Soviet occupation and the Latvian statehood continuity by the Russian Federation (as legal successor of the Soviet Union). The government of Latvia said that it remained open to signing the border treaty as soon as possible. Declaration (26 April 2005) “By signing the border agreement with the Russian Federation, Latvia confirms its good will to promote good neighbourly relations with the Russian Federation and simultaneously expresses its satisfaction of the willingness of the Russian Federation to develop good neighbourly relation with Latvia. Latvia declares that by Article 1 of this agreement it understands the de facto functioning line of demarcation dating from year 1990/1991, which is documented and technically described in the annex of the agreement. The only objective and subject of this agreement is to document the above mentioned line of demarcation in order to ensure and to facilitate its practical functioning in the interests of both countries and their residents as well as in the mutual interests of the European Union and the Russian Federation. Latvia does not link this agreement with the broader issue of the elimination of the consequences of the illegal occupation of Latvia. Latvia declares that this agreement is not related and does not diminish, does not deprive the state of Latvia and its citizens of the rights and legal claims provided by the international law, including the Peace Treaty between Latvia and Russia of 11 August 1920, and by state law of the Republic of Latvia…” Peace Treaty between Latvia and Russia (Riga, 11 August 1920) Article II “…Russia recognises without objection the independence and sovereignty of the Latvian State and forever renounces all sovereign rights held by Russia in relation to the Latvian nation and land on the basis of the previous State legal regime as well as any international agreements…” Article III “ The State border between Latvia and Russia shall extend: From the Estonian border between the villages of Babina and Vymorsk, through the village of Vymorsk along the river Glubica, through Vashkova, then along the small river Opochna and the rivers Opochka and Vyada to Dubinina, from there by the shortest straight line to the river Kuhva, then along the river Kuhva and its tributary the river Pelega to Umernishi, from there in a straight line to its bend at Malaya Melnica, from there in a straight line to the river Utroja to the letter "v" on the sign "Kailova", along the river Utroja to the river Lzha bend which is located two versts North from the sign "Starina", then along the Lzha river and the administrative border between the Ludza, 8 June 2006 3 DG External Policies Delegations Europe Rezekne and Daugavpils regions and the Opochka, Sebezh and Drisa regions to Pazina on the river Osunica, then in a straight line through Lake Beloje, Lake Chornoje, through the lake located between Vasileva and Mosishki through the large farm Saveiki to the delta of the small river that flows into the river Daugava between Koskovci and the large farm and village Novoje Selo, then along the river Daugava to the large farm Shafranovo” Commentary by the Russian Foreign Ministry (28 April 2005)¹ “…the text of the declaration does indeed mean the bringing forward of territorial claims against Russia, and deprives the treaty on the border state between our countries of its object and goal. The declaration means Latvia’s renunciation of the definition of the state border, which Riga designates as ‘border line’, and runs counter to international law, the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, and the provisions of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the Russian Federation and the European Union…Signing the state border treaty with Latvia on the terms set unilaterally by Riga loses all sense. Russia will be ready to sign the treaty as soon as Latvia disavows its unacceptable declaration.” Statement by Prime Minister of Latvia Aigars Kalvitis (29 April 2005) “Since regaining of independence governments of Latvia have consistently and clearly expressed readiness to sign the border treaty with Russia. The declaration approved by the government does not present territorial claims against Russia. This issue is not on the agenda of Latvian-Russian relations. Latvia will respect the borders defined by the prepared and initialled treaty. We are certain that a Latvia's and Russia's differing opinion on the historic matters of the 20th century is the reason for the exasperated rhetoric between both countries. The true intention of Latvia is to do everything to find a common opinion on this issue in the future and thus create the basis for new relations with Russia that would be based on principles of democracy and international law. Intended to serve this aim, the unilateral declaration of the government of Latvia on the Latvian-Russian border treaty marks the historical keystones that Latvia sees as the fundamental basis for relations with Russia in the future. Due to the complex questions concerning history and occupation in the 20th century, the Constitution of Latvia does not allow the government of Latvia to sign the prepared border treaty in any other way than by adopting the mentioned unilateral declaration. We are aware that at the moment, taking into account the processes in Russia, it is difficult to hope for a fast progress on the issue of occupation of the Baltic States; nevertheless, this does not allow us ignore our Constitution and history, which cannot be annulled or changed by decisions of the government. The government of Latvia once more reaffirms its willingness and readiness to sign the border treaty and at the same time invites the Russian side to an open and brave dialogue about history prior to or after the signing of the border treaty.” Article 1 of Satversme (Constitution of Latvia) reads as follows: —————— ¹Russia already signed (24 October 1997) and ratified (21 May 2003) the border treaties with Lithuania. The similar treaties were signed between Russia and Estonia on 18 May 2005 and ratified by the Riigikogu (Estonian parliament) on 22 June. Moscow claimed that the ratification act adopted by the Riigikogu contained ‘unacceptable provisions’, such as reference to the Tartu Peace Treaty of 2 February 1920, Resolution of the Supreme Council on national independence of Estonia of 20 August 1991, Declaration of the Riigikogu on restoration of constitutional power of 7 October 1992. On 13 August Russia withdrew its signature from the border treaties. 8 June 2006 4 DG External Policies Delegations Europe “The territory of the State of Latvia, within the borders established by international agreements, consists of Vidzeme, Latgale, Kurzeme and Zemgale.” According to Article 1, the Jaunlatgale/Abrene district (now Pytalovo district of Pskov Oblast of the Russian Federation) is part of the Latvian territory. Article 77 of Satversme reads as follows: “If the Saeima (parliament of Latvia) has amended the first, second, third, forth, sixth or seventy-seventh Article of the Constitution, such amendments in order to come into force as law, shall be submitted to a national referendum.” Abrene/Pytalovo district Abrene was an administrative district in the Republic of Latvia with an area of 4292 km², formed in 1925 as the Jaunlatgale district, but was renamed Abrene in 1938.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social and Economic Space Compression in Border Areas: the Case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I
    www.ssoar.info Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Romanova, E., Vinogradova, O., & Frizina, I. (2015). Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District. Baltic Region, 3, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2015-3-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51391-6 Economic and geographical development of the Russian Northwest ECONOMIC AND GEOGRAPHICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN NORTHWEST The so-called “compression” of social SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC and economic space has been the subject of SPACE COMPRESSION quite a few studies in the past decades. There are two principle types of compres- IN BORDER AREAS: sion: communicative, that is, associated THE CASE with the development of transport and in- OF THE NORTHWESTERN formation systems, and physical, mani- FEDERAL DISTRICT fested in the rapid decrease of the number of new territories to explore. While physi- cal and communicative compression are in- terrelated, they have different spatial ex- * pressions depending on geographical con- E.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Soviet Border Disputes—The Case of Estonia, Latvia, and Russia
    The Long Shadow of History: Post-Soviet Border Disputes— The Case of Estonia, Latvia, and Russia Claes Levinsson ∗ Introduction Ever since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the question of the precise territo- rial delimitations of the Estonian and Latvian borders with the Russian Federation has been a source of discord between the states, and a permanent point of irritation. The question of these national boundaries became an important issue on the political agenda shortly after Estonia and Latvia regained their independence in 1991. The prin- cipal reason for this laid in the arbitrary transfers of territory and the “correction” of borders that was made by the Soviet government shortly after its reoccupation of the Baltic states. In 1991, both Estonia and Latvia pleaded their cases according to inter- national law, and demanded that the borders from the interwar period should be re- stored.1 During the mid-1990s, both Estonia and Latvia gave up their initial claims, and the substance of an agreement was negotiated between the parties. However, the Rus- sian Federation has ever since postponed the ratification of the agreement, claiming that it would not sign any treaty until other contested issues—such as the alleged dis- crimination against the large Russian-speaking minority in the Baltic states—are re- solved in a satisfactory manner. This means that there does not exist any formal and ratified solution to the question of the boundaries of Estonia and Latvia, and that the border issues between the parties are, at least formally, still unresolved. During the prolonged history of these border disputes, neither the EU nor NATO has actively interfered in the contretemps, and the absence of a ratified treaty did not prevent the accession of Estonia and Latvia to the EU and NATO in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Sebezh Has a Railroad Station on the Moscow-Riga Line, 189 Kilometers South of Pskov
    Sebezh has a railroad station on the Moscow-Riga line, 189 kilometers south of Pskov. In 1922 it was still part of Vitehsk province." Peter Kenez University of California, Santa Cruz William B. Husband. Revolution in the Factory: The Birth of the Soviet Textile Industry, 1917-1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. vii, 227 pp. $45.50 Cdn. Distributed in Canada by Oxford University Press, Don Mills, Ontario. The rank and file workers in the textile industry expressed precise and immanently concrete, if not altogether unpredictable, complaints. At a Nizhnii-Novgorod provincial conference, the workers at the Reshetekhin Factory reported a shortage of fuel and of skilled workers; the Trubanov Factory needed qualified specialists; the food crisis had reduced production significantly at the Molotov Factory and forced workers to desert the Nizhegorod Wool Factory in large numbers to search for food; a typhus epidemic reduced work at the Gorbatov Factory by half; and the Gorbatov and Rastiakin Rope Factories complained about the absence of cultural- educational work. Later reports indicated shortages of cotton had not yet affecf,ed the Medvedov and Danilov Factories, but the Shlikterman had just closed down; fuel shortages severely crippled the Tritskaia and Dubovits Factories, while the Strelkov and the former Tregubov Factories were forced to close their doors. But the problem with studying the work- ing class from the local perspective, specifically the textile workers of the Central Industrial Region, is that this "agenda," with but slight variations, holds true for, say, the fall of 1915 and the spring of 1917; the fall of 1918 and mid-1919; and even for the fall of 1921! As Husband astutely points out in his conclusion, the same 'local interests continued to be identified in 1918-1920 much as they had been against the Imperial and Provisional governments in 1917" (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes”
    THIRD STEP OF EUROREGION “COUNTRY OF LAKES” Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes” Project „Third STEP for the strategy of Euroregion “Country of lakes” – planning future together for sustainable social and economic development of Latvian-Lithuanian- Belarussian border territories/3rd STEP” "3-rd step” 2014 Strategy 2020 of Euroregion „Country of Lakes” This action is funded by the European Union, by Latvia, Lithuania and Belarus Cross-border Cooperation Programme within the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument. The Latvia, Lithuania and Belarus Cross-border Cooperation Programme within the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument succeeds the Baltic Sea Region INTERREG IIIB Neighbourhood Programme Priority South IIIA Programme for the period of 2007-2013. The overall strategic goal of the programme is to enhance the cohesion of the Latvian, Lithuanian and Belarusian border region, to secure a high level of environmental protection and to provide for economic and social welfare as well as to promote intercultural dialogue and cultural diversity. Latgale region in Latvia, Panevėžys, Utena, Vilnius, Alytus and Kaunas counties in Lithuania, as well as Vitebsk, Mogilev, Minsk and Grodno oblasts take part in the Programme. The Joint Managing Authority of the programme is the Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Lithuania. The web site of the programme is www.enpi-cbc.eu. The European Union is made up of 28 Member States who have decided to gradually link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, during a period of enlargement of 50 years, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • ESTLATRUS TRAFFIC ELRI-109 Outputs and Results
    ESTLATRUS TRAFFIC ELRI-109 outputs and results Outputs Traffic Education Parks installed in Karsava, Rezekne (Latvia), Pskov, Krasnogordosk, Pytalovo (Russia) and Voru (Estonia). Altogether 6325m2 territory reconstructed, 7 training equipment sets, 30 training materials sets, 1 testing equipment set Traffic Education Park (Russia) 3-days International Forum "Safe Wheel" for 72 bicycle riders 4 international campaigns hold: o ’’Know the traffic regulations abroad” for 5000 drivers and travellers o ’’Father, mother and me - protected family’’ with 12000 children involved o ’’Love life’’ for 120 new drivers o ’’Sleep and drive!’’ for 2500 drivers crossing 2 LV- RU and 1 EE-RU borders Improvements of transport and road information International campaign “Father, mother infrastructure by impacted zone in distance of and me – protected family” (Russia) 49,09km of transit streets, including: Road surface reconstruction, incl. lighting 4,697km, 3 parking places (3961sq.m), reconstruction of pedestrian roads 2,416km, marking streets with plastics 0,439km, installation of barriers 0,04km, 13 bus stops, 60 traffic/street signs, 4 welcoming signs, 4 Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) sets, 3 recreation areas, 4 information stands, 9 crossings including lighting Handbook and web based catalogue "Innovative streetscape design – Sustainable Transport and Public Improvement of road infrastructure in Space Development in Border Towns of Estonia, Latvia Võru (Estonia) and Russia" issued (100EE, 100LV, 100RU, 200 web entries) 4 study visits for 15 traffic
    [Show full text]
  • ~:, ~'., > ~, ~, H . .,,: ~ ~ ...R' '" S:' 7 " ~ Rr¸~ '' ~ :'I!7
    1985 : ~:~, ~'.~, > ~, ~, H .~ .,,~: ~ ~ ...... r'~ '~" S:~'~ 7 " ~ rr~¸¸~ ''¸¸ ~ :'~i!7 "~%" "< ....... 7¸¸ • 7"" "~ ..... '¸ ¸¸~ GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA No. 85. Records of the German Armed Forces High Command, Part VIII, War Economy and Armament Office (Oberkommando der Wehrmacht, Wehrwirtschafts-~ und Ruestungsamt) (OKW/Wi Rue Amt) National Archives and Records Administration Washington, DC: 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................... i Glos~ of Selected Terms and Abbreviations ................................. iv Captured German and Related Records in ~,he National Archives .................. vii Published. Guides to German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, V/~ ............. xxii Suggestions for Citing Microfilm .......................................... xxvi Instructions for Ordering Microfilm ........................................ x-xix Guide Entries .......................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION The Guide Proiect The Guides to German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, Va., constitui, e a series of finding aids to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) microfilm publications of seized records of German central, regional, and local government agencies and of military commands and units, as well as of the Nazi Party, its component formations, affiliated associations, and supervised organizations. For the most part, these records were created during the period 1920-1945. ~I~e guide series was initiated as
    [Show full text]
  • Pskov from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Coordinates: 57°49′N 28°20′E
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Pskov From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Coordinates: 57°49′N 28°20′E Pskov (Russian: Псков; IPA: [pskof] ( listen), ancient Russian spelling "Плѣсковъ", Pleskov) is Navigation Pskov (English) a city and the administrative center of Pskov Oblast, Russia, located about 20 kilometers Псков (Russian) Main page (12 mi) east from the Estonian border, on the Velikaya River. Population: 203,279 (2010 [1] Contents Census);[3] 202,780 (2002 Census);[5] 203,789 (1989 Census).[6] - City - Featured content Current events Contents Random article 1 History Donate to Wikipedia 1.1 Early history 1.2 Pskov Republic 1.3 Modern history Interaction 2 Administrative and municipal status Help 3 Landmarks and sights About Wikipedia 4 Climate Community portal 5 Economy Recent changes 6 Notable people Krom (or Kremlin) in Pskov Contact Wikipedia 7 International relations 7.1 Twin towns and sister cities Toolbox 8 References 8.1 Notes What links here 8.2 Sources Related changes 9 External links Upload file Special pages History [edit] Location of Pskov Oblast in Russia Permanent link Page information Data item Early history [edit] Cite this page The name of the city, originally spelled "Pleskov", may be loosely translated as "[the town] of purling waters". Its earliest mention comes in 903, which records that Igor of Kiev married a [citation needed] Print/export local lady, St. Olga. Pskovians sometimes take this year as the city's foundation date, and in 2003 a great jubilee took place to celebrate Pskov's 1,100th anniversary. Create a book Pskov The first prince of Pskov was Vladimir the Great's younger son Sudislav.
    [Show full text]
  • Pskov Regional Centre for Medical Prevention
    PSKOV REGIONAL CENTRE FOR MEDICAL PREVENTION IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERS’ COOPERATION WITH NORTHWEST RUSSIA IN HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION: MOBILIZING RESOURCES FOR BETTER RESPONSE TO HIV AND ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS: ACTIVITIES IN PSKOV REGION NORDIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERS’ COOPERATION WITH NORTHWEST RUSSIA The National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) is the administrator of the Programme Eligible NW Russian regions: St. Petersburg, Arkhangelsk Region, Kaliningrad Region, Leningrad Region, Murmansk Region, Pskov Region, and Republic of Karelia ONE OF THE TWO OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMME: STRENGTHENING INNOVATIVE PREVENTION WORK AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE AND SUPPORT TO VOLUNTEERISM Pursuant to order of the Pskov Regional Committee of Healthcare and Pharmacy “Approval of the local action plan for the implementation of the cooperation programme” (05.07.2017 № 550), it was decided to: Train volunteers to do HIV prevention among young people based on the peer-to-peer approach OUR PARTNERS IN PSKOV REGION: Pskov State University Pskov Polytechnic, Volunteer Team “INDIGO” Pskov Medical College, Volunteer Team “Kind Hearts” STAFF OF THE CENTRE FOR MEDICAL PREVENTION VOLUNTEER CAMP “HIV PREVENTION AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE” (11-13 SEPTEMBER 2017), 33 PEOPLE The camp participants received certificates and started a regional volunteer school (2017/2018) https://vk.com/club51940174 SKILLS PRACTICING “HIV PREVENTION AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE” 70 classes, 1,400 people covered Pskov Polytechnic 42 classes held, coverage - 772 people Pskov
    [Show full text]
  • Tel Sprav2013.Pdf
    ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ ПСКОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ТЕЛЕФОНЫ АДРЕСА 2014 ББК 92 (4Пс) У92 Составитель Э.Ф. Винтанюк, консультант отдела управления делами, кадров Государственного управления образования Псковской области Информацию для справочника представили специалисты рай(гор)управлений образования области, учреждений обра- зования областного и федерального подчинения. Названия учреждений даны в соответствии с информацией на 20.12.2014 г. Учреждения образования: информация, телефоны, адреса: У92 справочник / сост. Э.Ф. Винтанюк. – 10-е изд., доп. и перераб. – Псков: ПОИПКРО, 2014. – 168 с. Справочник содержит информационный материал по сфере образования области (адреса, телефоны). ББК 92 (4Пс) © Издательство Псковского областного института повышения квалификации работников образования, 2014 ÑÎÄÅÐÆÀÍÈÅ Аппарат Государственного управления образования Псковской области .................................................... 7 Городские и районные управления, отделы образования Псковской области .......................................................................... 11 Псковская областная организация профсоюза работников народного образования и науки РФ .............................................. 24 Вузы ФГОУ ВПО «Великолукская государственная академия физической культуры и спорта» ................................................... 25 ФГОУ ВПО «Великолукская государственная сельскохозяйственная академия» ................................................ 25 ФГОУ ВПО «Псковский государственный университет» .............
    [Show full text]
  • Zarasai, Litnuania [email protected] DATE LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN of COMMAND 163
    162 290. INFANTtRIE-DIVISION - UNIT HISTORY LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN OF COMMAND 1940/02/01 Tr.Ueb.Pl. monster, Wenrkreis X, Activation (8. Welle), Subordinate to: Stellv.Gen.Kdo. X, 1940/02/01-1940/05/16 Soltau, Fallingbostel, iibstorf, formation, training C.O.: Gen.Lt. Max uennerlein, 1940/02/06-1940/06/09 Schneveraingen, Bergen, WenrKr. XI (source: situation maps of Lage West ana general officer personnel files) 1940/05/10 Operational readiness 1940/05/14 Schnee citei Transfer Subordinate to: AK 38, 1940/05/17-1940/05/20 1940/05/19 Reuland, Weisstoampach, Saint- Movement AK 42, 1940/05/21-1940/05/23 Hubert, Libin, Gedinne, Belgium 1940/05/24 Kevin, Any, Origny-en-Thieracne, Movement, AK 38, 1940/05/24 Vervins, Sains- Ricnauinont, offensive engagements AK 42, 1940/05/25-1940/06/02 Saint-^uentin, Venaeuil, Laon, AK 18, 1940/06/03-1940/07/08 Oise-Aisne Canal, Soissons, wezy, Chateau-Tiiierry, Nangis, Montargis, CoO.: Gen.Lt. Theodor Frhr. von Wrede, 1940/06/08-1942/07/01 Bieneau, Gien, France 1940/00/21 Bieneau, Gien Offensive engagements 1940/07/01 Cnateauoriant, La Baule, Blois, Coastal defense, 1940/10/10 Neung, Vivy, floyetut, Anders, security, Saint-i>iazaire, Nantes occupation duty, training (no records for I940/0o/21-l941/01/31, source: situation maps of Lage West) 1941/02/01 La iiaule, Cnateaubriant, Nantes Coastal defense, security Subordinate to: AK 25, 1941/02/01-1941/02/28 1941/02/25 Gruuziadz, Poland Transfer, training AK 1, 1941/03/01-1941/03/15 AK 2, 1941/03/16-1941/03/31 1941/04/08 Elbing, Wormditt (Orneta), Movement, AK
    [Show full text]
  • And Pskov Region (Russia)
    Vol. 8, 2020 A new decade for social changes ISSN 2668-7798 www.techniumscience.com 9 772668 779000 Technium Social Sciences Journal Vol. 8, 694-709, June 2020 ISSN: 2668-7798 www.techniumscience.com Holiday Advertising in the Borderland: The Specificity of Perception in Latgale Region (Latvia) and Pskov Region (Russia) Oksana Kovzele Daugavpils University, Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Centre of Cultural Research, Latvia [email protected] Abstract. Holiday advertising is a rather topical object of research that nowadays attracts attention of specialists in various branches opening new perspectives of investigating this phenomenon. One of them is the analysis of the specificity of functioning and perception of holiday advertising in various European and world countries including a comparative perspective of the border zone. The present paper reveals the specificity of the perception of holiday advertising by the example of the south-eastern region of Latvia – Latgale (the major object of the research) and Pskov region that is a part of the north-western federal province of Russia (the minor object of the research) on the basis of interviews carried out in 2018 with the participation of 906 residents of this border area. During the survey, respondents had an opportunity to express their opinion on holiday advertising in general as well as note the positive and negative impacts on a common present-day consumer. Processing of the survey data leads to the conclusion that the notion of holiday advertising in Latgale has been generally crystallized as it is rather often used in daily life, including for the selection of gifts for festive occasions, whereas in Pskov region there is no unified opinion on the essence and significance of holiday advertising yet as, in the respondents’ opinion, its potential is not used to a full extent.
    [Show full text]