DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliometric Analysis of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Literature Published in Web of Science 2019–2020 Rai K

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliometric Analysis of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Literature Published in Web of Science 2019–2020 Rai K [Downloaded free from http://www.jfcmonline.com on Monday, February 8, 2021, IP: 217.52.7.41] Review Article Access this article online Quick Response Code: Bibliometric analysis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) literature published in Web of Science 2019–2020 Rai K. Farooq, Shafiq Ur Rehman1, Murtaza Ashiq2, Nadeem Siddique3, 1 Website: Shakil Ahmad www.jfcmonline.com DOI: 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_332_20 Abstract: Coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China, turned into a pandemic in record time. Communication of disease presentation and mechanism of spread remain keys to getting ahead of the virus and limiting its spread beyond the capacity of management. Owing to huge academic focus and pandemic concern around the globe, this bibliometric analysis investigated research productivity related to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic using the Web of Science database. The relevant data were harvested, and search query was further refined by publication years (2020 OR 2019) and document types (article, book chapter, and proceedings paper). Finally, 6694 records were imported and downloaded in Plaintext and BibTeX formats on August 1, 2020. The data analysis was performed using MS Excel, VOS viewer, and Biblioshiny software. Of the 6694 publications that appeared in that period, the USA and Chinese research institutions topped the numbers. At the same time, the Journal of Medical Virology and CUREUS (Cureus Journal of Medical Science), remained favorite journals for publications. The pattern of multi-author publications has outstripped that of single-authors. Apart from COVID-19 and the novel coronavirus, the important keywords mentioned included pandemic, pneumonia, epidemiology, public health, outbreak, epidemic, China, infection, and treatment. The analysis shows a strong local research response from China, with large teams reporting on the disease Department of outbreak. Subsequent studies will document a global response as the virus spreads worldwide. The Neuroscience initial research related to the current coronavirus outbreak was reported from within China. The data Research, Institute for and patterns were supposed to alter as the virus spread globally. Research and Medical Keywords: Consultations, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal 2019-nCoV, bibliometric, bibliometric-coronavirus, COVID-19, health care, pandemic, China, severe University, 1Deanship acute respiratory syndrome-cov-2, research productivity, the World Health Organization of Library Affairs, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, 2Library Introduction family; however, no confirmatory links [1] and Information Science were established. The World Health Department, Islamabad n today’s connected world, contagious Organization (WHO) was alarmed about this Model College for Boys, and previously unknown pathogens outbreak. Within a month (January 30, 2020), Islamabad, 3Gad & Birgit I Rausing Library, Lahore have become a public health problem. In the WHO had declared this outbreak a University of Management late December 2019, the health facilities of global health emergency. On March 11, 2020, Sciences, Lahore, Wuhan city in China reported receiving they pronounced it a pandemic.[2] In the Pakistan patients with chest infection of an unknown absence of a specific treatment or vaccine, cause. The clinical picture of these patients minimizing human contact was the only Address for [3] correspondence: resembled viral chest infections and included way to slow its spread. Dr. Shafiq Ur Rehman, fever, cough, and dyspnea. Initial laboratory Imam Abdulrahman Bin investigations linked it with the Coronavirus The virus has been named a novel Faisal University, coronavirus and coded as COVID‑19 and P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under 2019‑nCoV. Phylogenetic analyses have Saudi Arabia. the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial revealed its close similarity with the severe E-mail: suRehman@iau. ‑ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and edu.sa build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as appropriate How to cite this article: Farooq RK, Rehman SU, credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the Ashiq M, Siddique N, Ahmad S. Bibliometric analysis Received: 20-08-2020 identical terms. of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) literature Revised: 05-09-2020 published in Web of Science 2019–2020. J Fam Accepted: 11-09-2020 Community Med 2021;28:1-7. Published: 07-01-2021 For reprints contact: [email protected] © 2021 Journal of Family and Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 1 [Downloaded free from http://www.jfcmonline.com on Monday, February 8, 2021, IP: 217.52.7.41] Farooq, et al.: Bibliometric analysis of COVID‑19 acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)‑related coronavirus from the Web of Science (WOS), the most authentic clade.[4] It is a single‑stranded positive‑sense ribonucleic indexing and abstracting database in the world. In the acid (RNA) type virus, which bears 82% similarity to WOS core collection, the following search query was run SARS‑CoV. Predominantly, patients on presentation in title and Author Keyword field. have respiratory symptoms, but may also involve intestines, liver, and brain.[5] TI= (coronavirus OR covid19 OR covid‑19 OR ncov2019 OR sars‑cov‑2 OR “SARS COV 2” OR Initial studies on 2019‑nCoV highlight its zoonotic orthocoronavirinae) OR AK = (coronavirus OR origin designating bats as the carriers.[6] As much as covid19 OR covid‑19 OR ncov2019 OR sars‑cov‑2 OR 96% similarity was detected at the whole genome “SARS COV 2” OR orthocoronavirinae). level between 2019‑nCoV and a bat CoV. However, an intermediate host remains a mystery.[7] The reported The query was further refined by publication years mortality rate of COVID‑19 remains close to 2%, lower (2020 OR 2019) and document types (article, or review than SARS reported in 2003 (>40%),[8] and MERS, article or book chapter or proceedings paper or early access). reported in 2012 (30%).[9] As of August 1, 2020, 17,771,634 Letters, data paper, news items, and editorials were confirmed 2019‑nCoV cases had been reported globally. excluded. Finally, the 6694 records (articles = 3917, early There have been 683,278 deaths in 213 countries, areas, access articles = 1487, review articles = 1023 review, or territories globally.[10] early access review articles = 263, book chapters = 3, and proceeding paper = 1) were imported and downloaded There was a surge in relevant publications after the SARS in Plaintext and BibTeX formats on July 9–August 1, outbreak in 2003. As reviewed later,[11] the news features 2020.The citation impact (CI) used in this study was were the dominant type of publication (32%), while calculated by dividing the total number of citations by 25% editorials, 22% research articles, and 13% of letters the total number of publications. This illustrates the were published. The US and Hong Kong contributed average number of citations that a specific publication 30% and 24% of publications, respectively. The SARS has received. Besides, some terminologies are defined publication pattern suggested immediate citation but by the WOS database, such as usage count U1 which low international collaboration. refers to the usage count of the last 180 days. The data analysis was performed using MS Excel, MS Access, and The knowledge gaps on 2019‑nCoV can only be various bibliometric softwares, including VOS viewer, filled if public health authorities continually update Biblioshiny (RStudio), and BibExcel. epidemiological data as China did. Early disease recognition and communication of the knowledge can Results minimize the spread by early implementation of public health measures. This study is intended to review In 2019, 324 publications obtained 2105 citations and a bibliometric parameters of publication surge following usage count of 2776 whereas from January to July 2020, the COVID‑19 outbreak. i.e., 180 days, 6370 publications were recorded with 37,965 citations and a usage count of 46,885. This shows Research Questions that the COVID‑19 pandemic has had remarkable attention from researchers throughout the world. 1. What are the most productive countries and organizations? Most Productive Countries and 2. In what favorite sources would COVID‑19 researchers Organizations like to publish their work? 3. What are the authorship and collaborative patterns Table 1 indicates top 10 countries and organizations that of COVID‑19 researchers? produced COVID‑19 literature globally. All countries 4. What are the most frequently used keywords and in the table produced over 100 publications from 2019 co‑occurrence network in COVID‑19 research? to July 1, 2020. Only four countries produced over 500 5. What kind of relationship is based on three‑factor publications. The United States of America (USA) is at analysis (countries, keywords, and organizations)? the top of the list with 1860 publications, 9468 citations 6. Which research papers are highly influential with followed by China with 1510, Italy with 782, and England respect to citation and usage count on COVID‑19? with 592 publications. It has been observed that though the USA has a higher number of publications, the impact Materials and Methods of publications by China is higher than any country. Of the top 10 organizations, Huazhong University Science To examine the publishing trends and patterns on and Technology produced 193 publications and 5484 COVID‑19 pandemic, bibliometric data were retrieved citations,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edi3ng a Scien3fic Journal
    Eding a Scienfic Journal Leading and Shaping Your Discipline Mary M. Christopher, DVM, PhD Karen M. Young, VMD, PhD ! Veterinary Medicine Small journals lack visibility • U.S. Naonal Library of Medicine indexes 5,515 in MEDLINE, of >18,000 journals received • 90% of relevant informaon is published in 10% of biomedical journals • Science Citaon Index: <2% of journals from small and developing countries • Small journals are oen ‘not seen’, even when the informaon is important Indexing + access = visibility Indexing Is your journal indexed? Where? Online publicaon Is your journal published online? Access to arcles Is a journal subscripon required to access your arcles? Indexing • A systemac organizaon of the literature to facilitate informaon retrieval • VISIBILITY: provide a simple way to gain global visibility for lile/no cost • ACCESS: can serve as a portal to online content • QUALITY: oen have criteria for technical, editorial, and research quality and a stable publicaon record Major indexers of scienfic journals Types of indexes • Open indexes – Google Scholar – Index Copernicus • Quality-controlled indexes – MEDLINE/PubMed – CAB Internaonal • Citaon indexes (also quality-controlled) – Scopus – Web of Science Indexes and journal selecon • “Bradford’s Law”: a small number of journals in a discipline publish the majority of significant scholarly work • Thus, most indexes use criteria to select journals for inclusion – Must meet basic publishing standards, publish regularly – Relevant scope – Original, peer-reviewed content – Editorial and
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliometric Analysis of Virology in Colombia (2000–2013)
    Original Article Virology research in a Latin American developing country: a bibliometric analysis of virology in Colombia (2000–2013) Julian Ruiz-Saenz1,3, Marlen Martinez-Gutierrez1,2,3 1 Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Animales-GRICA, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Bucaramanga, Colombia 2 Grupo de Investigación Infettare, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia 3 Asociación Colombiana de Virología, Bogotá, Colombia Abstract Introduction: Bibliometric analysis demonstrates that the virology research in Latin America has increased. For this reason, the objective of this study was to evaluate Colombian publications on viruses and viral diseases in indexed journals during the period from 2000 to 2013. Methodology: The bibliographic data were collected from MedLine, SciELO, LILACS and Scopus databases. The database was constructed in Excel descriptive statistics. The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) was evaluated using the SCImago Journal & Country Rank in 2013 and was used as an indicator of the quality of the journals used by the Colombian researchers. Results: The total number of papers published was 711, of which 40.4% were published in local journals, and 59.6% were published in foreign journals. Most (89.2%) were original papers. Moreover, 34.2% of the papers were published in collaboration with international researchers, with the United States being the most represented. Of the journals used, 85.6% had an SJR, and 14.4% did not. The median SJR of the papers was 0.789, and the median of the papers with international collaborators was higher compared to the SJR of the papers without international collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • BMC Infectious Diseases Biomed Central
    BMC Infectious Diseases BioMed Central Correspondence Open Access Mapping the history and current situation of research on John Cunningham virus – a bibliometric analysis Hua-chuan Zheng*1, Lei Yan2, Lei Cui2, Yi-fu Guan1 and Yasuo Takano3 Address: 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, PR China, 2Department of Medical Informatics and Information System, China Medical University, Shenyang, PR China and 3Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan Email: Hua-chuan Zheng* - [email protected]; Lei Yan - [email protected]; Lei Cui - [email protected]; Yi- fu Guan - [email protected]; Yasuo Takano - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 11 March 2009 Received: 1 July 2008 Accepted: 11 March 2009 BMC Infectious Diseases 2009, 9:28 doi:10.1186/1471-2334-9-28 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/9/28 © 2009 Zheng et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: John Cunningham virus (JCV) constitutes a family of polyoma viruses, which plays important roles in the progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and tumorigenesis. However, no bibliometric investigation has been reported to guide the researchers and potential readers. Methods: Papers were collected from database Sci-expanded and Pubmed until May 22, 2008. The highly-productive authors, institutes and countries, highly-cited authors and journals were ranked.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliometric Analysis
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Twenty-Year Span of Global Coronavirus Research Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Yi Zhou 1 and Liyu Chen 2,* 1 Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China; [email protected] 2 Department of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha 410078, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-0731-8235-5003 Received: 27 March 2020; Accepted: 25 April 2020; Published: 28 April 2020 Abstract: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic aroused global public concern and became a major medical issue. This study aims to investigate the global research routine and trends of coronavirus over the last twenty years based on the production, hotspots, and frontiers of published articles as well as to provide the global health system with a bibliometric reference. The Web of Science core collection database was retrieved for coronavirus articles published from 1 January 2000 to 17 March 2020. Duplicates and discrete papers were excluded. Analysis parameters including time, regions, impact factors, and citation times were processed through professional software. A total of 9043 coronavirus articles originated from 123 countries and were published in 1202 journals. The USA contributed most articles (3101) followed by China (2230). The research was published in specialized journals including the Journal of Virology. Universities were the main institutions of science progress. High-impact articles covered fields of basic science and clinical medicine. There were two sharp increases in research yields after the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreaks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Ebola in Science Citation Index
    Research Article A bibliometric analysis of research on Ebola Page 1 of 6 A bibliometric analysis of research on Ebola in AUTHORS: Science Citation Index Expanded Anastassios Pouris1 Yuh-Shan Ho2 An unprecedented outbreak of the Ebola virus in 2014 claimed more than 1000 lives in West Africa and the AFFILIATIONS: World Health Organization declared a global public health emergency. This outbreak will undoubtedly promote 1Institute of Technological additional research related to the Ebola virus and will create debate related to experimental drugs. This article Innovation, University of Pretoria, identified the quantum of research in the field since 1991; the scientific disciplines that contributed to the Pretoria, South Africa field; the countries, organisations and authors that supported such research and the most cited articles. 2Trend Research Centre, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan An increasing trend in annual production during 1991–2013 was observed. Journal of Virology, Journal of Infectious Diseases, and Virology were the three most productive journals in the field. Similarly, the CORRESPONDENCE TO: field of virology dominated the 73 categories in which the Ebola research was classified. A total of 63 Yuh-Shan Ho countries contributed to Ebola-related research, led by the USA. The most productive institutions were the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, the Centers for Disease Control and EMAIL: Prevention, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. African countries were more likely [email protected] to be involved in international collaboration than independent research. The most influential article exhibited POSTAL ADDRESS: a notable citation pattern and presented global trends in emerging infectious diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Research Trends of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus: a Bibliometric Analysis Sa’Ed H
    Zyoud BMC Infectious Diseases (2016) 16:255 DOI 10.1186/s12879-016-1600-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Global research trends of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a bibliometric analysis Sa’ed H. Zyoud1,2 Abstract Background: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a virus that causes severe viral pneumonia in humans, known to have a high mortality rate and a similarity in clinical symptoms with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. It was first isolated in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) in 2012 and after that, MERS-CoV exhibited outbreaks in several regions of the world. This study aimed to assess the characteristics of publications involving MERS-CoV at global level by using a bibliometric analysis. Methods: Scopus database was searched on March 4, 2016 for MERS-CoV publications published between 2012 and 2015. It was performed on the same day in order to avoid the possible bias came from update on the database because the metrics are changing over time. All publication types were considered; however publications as errata were excluded. Analysis parameters include year of publication, publication type, patterns of international collaboration, research institutions, journals, impact factor, h-index, language, and times cited. Results: A total of 883 MERS-CoV research publications were published across the world. The MERS-CoV-associated publications were originated from 92 countries/territories, indicating the international spread of MERS-CoV research. The USA was the largest contributor, with 319 articles published over 4 years, followed by KSA (113 articles). The total number of citations for these publications has already achieved 8,015, with an average of 9.01 citations per each publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Pandemic and the Unprecedented Mobilisation Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.31.126813; this version posted June 1, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Covid-19 pandemic and the unprecedented mobilisation of scholarly efforts prompted by a health crisis: Scientometric comparisons across SARS, MERS and 2019-nCov literature Milad Haghani, Michiel C. J. Bliemer The University of Sydney Business School, NSW, Australia bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.31.126813; this version posted June 1, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract During the current century, each major coronavirus outbreak has triggered a quick and immediate surge of academic publications on this topic. The spike in research publications following the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19) outbreak, however, has been like no other. The global crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has mobilised scientific efforts in an unprecedented way. In less than five months, more than 12,000 research items have been indexed while the number increasing every day. With the crisis affecting all aspects of life, research on Covid-19 seems to have become a focal point of interest across many academic disciplines. Here, scientometric aspects of the Covid-19 literature are analysed and contrasted with those of the two previous major Coronavirus diseases, i.e. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS).
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
    U.S. Citizenship Non-Precedent Decision of the and Immigration Administrative Appeals Office Services In Re: 17497613 Date: WL. 23, 2021 Appeal of Nebraska Service Center Decision Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Extraordinary Ability) The Petitioner, a research scientist in the field of molecular virology, seeks classification as an individual of extraordinary ability. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(l)(A), 8 U.S .C. § 1153(b)(l)(A). This first preference classification makes immigrant visas available to those who can demonstrate their extraordinary ability through sustained national or international acclaim and whose achievements have been recognized in their field through extensive documentation. The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish, as required, that the Petitioner meets at least three of the ten initial evidentiary criteria for this classification. The matter is now before us on appeal. In these proceedings, it is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the requested benefit by a preponderance of the evidence. See Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361; Matter ofChawathe, 25 l&N Dec. 369, 375 (AAO 2010). Upon de nova review, we will dismiss the appeal. I. LAW Section 203(b)(l) of the Act makes visas available to immigrants with extraordinary ability if: (i) the alien has extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics which has been demonstrated by sustained national or international acclaim and whose achievements have been recognized in the field through extensive documentation, (ii) the alien seeks to enter the United States to continue work in the area of extraordinary ability, and (iii) the alien's entry into the United States will substantially benefit prospectively the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliometric Review of Highly Cited and Hot Papers on Coronavirus and COVID 19
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln April 2021 A Bibliometric Review of Highly Cited and Hot Papers on Coronavirus and COVID 19 Rai Khalid Farooq Lecturer, Department of Neuroscience Research, Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, [email protected] Murtaza Ashiq Lecturer, Library and Information Science, Islamabad Model College for Boys, Islamabad, Pakistan, [email protected] Nadeem Siddique HoD Library, Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), [email protected] Shafiq Ur Rehman Associate Professor, Deanship of Library Affairs, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, [email protected] Hafiz Muhammad Adil Lecturer, Deptt of Library & Information Science, Govt. Degree College (B) Bedian Road, Lahore, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Khalid Farooq, Rai; Ashiq, Murtaza; Siddique, Nadeem; Rehman, Shafiq Ur; Adil, Hafiz Muhammad; and Ajmal Khan, Muhammad, "A Bibliometric Review of Highly Cited and Hot Papers on Coronavirus and COVID 19" (2021). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 5238. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5238 Authors Rai Khalid Farooq, Murtaza Ashiq, Nadeem Siddique, Shafiq Ur Rehman, Hafiz Muhammad Adil, and Muhammad Ajmal Khan This
    [Show full text]
  • Comparisons of Bibliometric Indices to Gauge the Quality of Virology Journals Md Safiqur Rahaman1,*, Hashem Hussein Al-Attas1, Khadeeja MN Ansari2
    Journal of Scientometric Res. 2021; 10(1):119-125 http://www.jscires.org Research-in-Progress Comparisons of Bibliometric Indices to Gauge the Quality of Virology Journals Md Safiqur Rahaman1,*, Hashem Hussein Al-Attas1, Khadeeja MN Ansari2 King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, KSA. College of Design, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, KSA. Correspondence Md Safiqur Rahaman ABSTRACT Deanship of Library Affairs, King Fahd The study proposed identifying and assessing virology journals’ quality by virtue of University of Petroleum and Minerals, internationally accepted bibliometric indicators, namely, JIF, CS, SJR, and h5-index. The data collected from Web of Science, Scopus, and Google metrics for the year Dhahran, KSA. 2018 under the category ‘Virology’. Thirty-six journals retrieved, then ranks and val- Email: [email protected] ues of journals compared with each indicator’s metrics. To assess the compatibility, the bivariate correlation coefficient calculated using SPSS. Microsoft Excel and Mi- Received: 10-12-2020 crosoft access 2010 used to analyze and visualize the journal’s ranking with each Revised: 07-03-2021 indicator. The results exclaim except Cell Host and Microbe, none of the journals Accepted: 09-04-2021 shows a similar ranking in all four indicators. Only seven journals are open access, DOI: 10.5530/jscires.10.1.14 and the rest of the 29 closed access—the USA leading ‘Virology’ researches. The calculation of the correlation coefficient indicates that all the indicators are compat- ible and can be used as an alternative to others to assess the journals’ quality. Main- stream researchers in virology can securely utilize the SJR and h5-index indices as feasible options to JIF.
    [Show full text]