DOCSLIB.ORG

ARCTIC BIRDS INTERNATIONAL BREEDING CONDITIONS SURVEY BULLETIN No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ARCTIC BIRDS INTERNATIONAL BREEDING CONDITIONS SURVEY BULLETIN No CAFF Technical Report No.21 April 2010 ARCTIC BIRDS INTERNATIONAL BREEDING CONDITIONS SURVEY BULLETIN No. 11 Acknowledgements tat, c onulluptat,Quis The Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) is a Working Group of the Arctic Council. CAFF Designated Agencies: • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland • The Ministry of Domestic A"airs, Nature and Environment, Greenland • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland • Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, Norway • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden • United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska CAFF Permanent Participant Organisations: • Aleut International Association (AIA) • Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC) • Gwich’in Council International (GCI) • Inuit Circumpolar Conference - (ICC) Greenland, Alaska and Canada • Russian Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) • Saami Council This publication should be cited as: Soloviev, M.Y. and Tomkovich, P.S. (eds.). 2010. Arctic Birds, #11 . CAFF Technical Report No. 21, CAFF International Secretariat, Akureyri, Iceland. Cover photo by Vasiliy Baranyuk. Incubating Common Eider on Wrangel Island in July 2008. For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: ca"@ca".is Internet: http://www.ca".is Editing: Mikhail Soloviev and Pavel Tomkovich Design & Layout: Tom Barry and Mikhail Soloviev ___ CAFF Designated Area ARCTIC BIRDS Bulletin of the International Breeding Conditions Survey supported by the International Wader Study Group and Wetlands International's Goose and Swan Specialist Groups No. 11 • 2009 compiled by Mikhail Soloviev and Pavel Tomkovich A WORD FROM THE COMPILERS ing season with view of making inference about wader breeding success (see the paper by Clive Minton et al. The focus of this issue of the bulletin of the Arctic in this issue). This is probably one of the most elaborate Birds Breeding Conditions Survey (ABBCS) is the examples of such an assessment and has no analogues reproductive performance of birds in relation to their on other flyways. environment in the Arctic and Subarctic in summer 2008. Arctic terrestrial ecosystems are remarkable for Further efforts were made in 2009 to increase the effec- pronounced fluctuations in the abundance and/or pro - tiveness of the ABBCS as an information resource. The ductivity at their high trophic levels, in birds and mam- survey websites ( http://www.arcticbirds.net/ and http:// www.arcticbirds.ru /) were updated with information on mals. These unstable systems could have been expected distribution, abundance and breeding status of selected to show quick response to increasing temperatures and Arctic predators and prey species (owls, Arctic Fox, precipitation across most of the Arctic during the recent Rough-legged Buzzard, Pomarine Skua and grouse) for decades. However, so far, the results of observations on the years 1988–2008. All pages are available in both the impacts of climate change in terrestrial ecosystems the English and Russian languages. A system allowing are less alarming compared with the melting of sea- on-line access to the database on individual species of ice and impacts on marine animals ( http://www.arctic. birds (available at http://arctic.ss.msu.ru/birdspe c) was noaa.gov/reportcar d). Apparently, this is partly due to a re-designed with view of increasing the functionality limited current understanding of the response of Arctic of interactive maps. These maps now maintain a selec- wildlife and ecosystems to both natural and human-in- tion of sites during zooming and panning; a number of duced changes. Several activities implemented in the other minor changes was also made. This functionality framework of the International Polar Year 2007–2008 is pending further improvement, and we would appreci- were aimed at filling this gap, for example Arctic Wild - ate a feed-back from users on features most urgently re- life Observatories Linking Vulnerable EcoSystems quired. We would like to use the opportunity to remind (ArcticWOLVES). This project builds a network of cir - that on-line information on individual species of birds cumpolar wildlife observatories in order to assess the is entered exclusively from submitted questionnaires current state of Arctic terrestrial food webs over a large (Part 2), and encourage contributors to fill the latter. It geographical range (http://www.cen.ulaval.ca/arctic - is also advisable to use the current set of survey forms wolves/index.html). This and similar initiatives made (updated in March 2009) which, in the first place, will an important contribution to the geographic coverage make submitting information easier for respondents. by ABBCS in 2008, and we anticipate that coordinated In the meantime the first reports of bird breeding condi - monitoring in future will help to obtain a better pic- tions for season 2009 has been published to the ABBCS ture of ecosystem processes developing at a pan-Arctic websites. Many more observation points are needed to scale. discover patterns in bird breeding success and to relate Some population parameters of Arctic animals can be them to observed environmental factors. However, in currently evaluated only outside of the Arctic. A tradi- due time this process of long-term data accumulation tional contribution to the “Arctic Birds” bulletin was should enable us to make legitimate predictions about made by Australian colleagues, who measured juvenile response of Arctic bird communities to the current glo- proportions in wader populations during the non-breed- bal change. BULLETIN # 11 CONTENTS LOCALITY REPORTS............................................................................................................................3 BIRD BREEDING CONDITIONS IN THE ARCTIC IN 2008 P.S. Tomkovich & M.Y. Soloviev .............................................................................................................47 CONTACT INFORMATION.................................................................................................................55 WADER BREEDING SUCCESS IN THE 2008 ARCTIC SUMMER, BASED ON JUVENILE RATIOS OF BIRDS WHICH SPEND THE NON-BREEDING SEASON IN AUSTRALIA C. Minton, R. Jessop & C. Hassell .........................................................................................................53 INDEX OF SCIENTIFIC NAMES........................................................................................................63 INTERESTING LINKS AND PUBLICATIONS..................................................................................66 MAP COLLECTION.............................................................................................................................66 For the latest information about the survey and data access visit the websites: http://www.arcticbirds.net, http://www.arcticbirds.ru Please contact the project coordinators with queries, comments and proposals: Mikhail Soloviev Pavel Tomkovich Dept. of Vertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Zoological Museum, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia B.Nikitskaya St., 6, Moscow, 125009, Russia e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Our most sincere thanks to everyone who participated in the survey in 2008 and/or previous years, in particular to V.G. Degtyarev, Y.V Krasnov, R. Lanctot and S.P. Paskhanly who stimulated others to join the survey. J. R. Wilson provided invaluable help by improving the English. Bird drawing on page 54 by E.A. Koblik. © 2009 International Wader Study Group 2 ARCTIC BREEDING CONDITIONS Figure. Arctic localities from which reports about bird breeding conditions in 2008 were provided LOCALITY REPORTS Skuas also showed a dramatic drop in numbers of territorial and breeding pairs. Only two nests of Long-tailed Skuas were 1. Varanger Peninsula, Norway (70°30′ N, 29°30′ E) found (ca. 0.1 pairs/km 2) compared to high breeding densi- Populations of the Norway Lemming*, Grey-sided Vole and ties the year before (ca. 1 breeding pair/km 2). Only two nests Tundra Vole that had the distinct peak of a 5-year cycle in of Rough-legged Buzzards were found compared to 5 nests 2007 crashed during early spring in 2008. Live lemmings in 2007. Seven pairs of Arctic Foxes were found to have es- were still seen on the snow surface in April and May, but the tablished on dens in April, but only two of them produced populations of both voles and lemmings had reached a bot- litters. 2008 appeared to be a very poor year for the Willow tom level when trapping was conducted at the end of June. Grouse as very few appeared to produce clutches. The ecological investigation on Varanger Peninsula is fo- R.A. Ims cused on food web dynamics, in particular, on the relation- ship between small rodent prey and their predators. Snowy 2. Gorodetsky Cape, Rybachy Peninsula, Kola Peninsula, Owls were present as late as early April 2008, thereafter they Russia (69°36′ N, 32°57′ E) were not seen. However, Snowy Owls were clearly fewer Based on observations on 9–20 June, the season was late and than at the same season in 2007, and they did not form pairs. cold. Air temperatures did not exceed +6°С in this period. Surveys for nests of Rough-legged
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Arctic Nation a U.S
    Connecting the United States to the Arctic OUR ARCTIC NATION A U.S. Arctic Council Chairmanship Initiative Cover Photo: Cover Photo: Hosting Arctic Council meetings during the U.S. Chairmanship gave the United States an opportunity to share the beauty of America’s Arctic state, Alaska—including this glacier ice cave near Juneau—with thousands of international visitors. Photo: David Lienemann, www. davidlienemann.com OUR ARCTIC NATION Connecting the United States to the Arctic A U.S. Arctic Council Chairmanship Initiative TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 Alabama . .2 14 Illinois . 32 02 Alaska . .4 15 Indiana . 34 03 Arizona. 10 16 Iowa . 36 04 Arkansas . 12 17 Kansas . 38 05 California. 14 18 Kentucky . 40 06 Colorado . 16 19 Louisiana. 42 07 Connecticut. 18 20 Maine . 44 08 Delaware . 20 21 Maryland. 46 09 District of Columbia . 22 22 Massachusetts . 48 10 Florida . 24 23 Michigan . 50 11 Georgia. 26 24 Minnesota . 52 12 Hawai‘i. 28 25 Mississippi . 54 Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. Photo: iStock.com 13 Idaho . 30 26 Missouri . 56 27 Montana . 58 40 Rhode Island . 84 28 Nebraska . 60 41 South Carolina . 86 29 Nevada. 62 42 South Dakota . 88 30 New Hampshire . 64 43 Tennessee . 90 31 New Jersey . 66 44 Texas. 92 32 New Mexico . 68 45 Utah . 94 33 New York . 70 46 Vermont . 96 34 North Carolina . 72 47 Virginia . 98 35 North Dakota . 74 48 Washington. .100 36 Ohio . 76 49 West Virginia . .102 37 Oklahoma . 78 50 Wisconsin . .104 38 Oregon. 80 51 Wyoming. .106 39 Pennsylvania . 82 WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE AN ARCTIC NATION? oday, the Arctic region commands the world’s attention as never before.
    [Show full text]
  • Courier Gazette
    T he Courier-G r ie. ROCKLAND GAZETTE ESTABLISHED 1S4O.) ROCKLAND COCKIER EHTAIII.ISHEI) 1S74.| O n |1rcss is % ^rtlftmchcan $cber that Iftobcs Ijjc &?lorlb at £too Dollars a ilcar l TWO DOLLARS A YEAR IN ADYANCBi 1 MINGLE COPIES PRICE FIVE CKNT8, V o l. 8 , — N ew S e r ie s . ROCKLAND, MAINE, TUESDAY, APRILS, 1889. N umber 13. ? p p ? W here cnt» I invest my s h t in g s Hint, th e y H.GALI.ERT’S may lie safe nnil yet yield me n good rate of Interest? T I I 13 OFFERINC House Furnishing Co. (O F M A IN E) OF •AYR IT S ST O CK H O LDERDERR 10 PER LADIES’ SPRINC CENT ’cr A nnum DIVIDENDS JANUARY ANU JULY. For full particnlars call on or write JACKETS! DAV1I) W. SEARS, 17 Milk SI. S-20 ROOM f», BOSTON. Or the Treasurer of the Company, Portland, Me JACKETS ! = HOTEL ST. CTEKB5Sfi?HBW3iWH Fifth Ave. and 39th St., N. Y. JACKETS! Zfcu American Plan $4 OD per day; Bath and Parlors extra. European Plan $1.50 per day and upwards, Among the many New Goods we are LON NUTTER, : Proprietor. J now daily receiving for our Spring Fornv-rly op Bangor Steamship Line. j Trade, we call especial attention to ROCKLAND TOW BOAT our COMPAMY. NEW STYLES OF id B ritannia. This Company has Two Good Boats, one large for outside work, and the other smaller for inside Ladies’ Jersey and Cloth work, and are prepared to receive orders for any towing job that may come up, either Inside or Outside, Anywhere Along J a c k e ts ! the Coast of Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Muraviovka Park, Amur Province, Far East Russia, For
    FORKTAIL 33 (2017): 81–87 The importance of Muraviovka Park, Amur province, Far East Russia, for bird species threatened at regional, national and international level based on observations between 2011 and 2016 WIELAND HEIM & SERGEI M. SMIRENSKI The middle reaches of the Amur River in Far East Russia are still an under-surveyed region, yet holding a very high regional biodiversity. During a six-year survey at Muraviovka Park, a non-governmental nature reserve, 271 bird species have been recorded, 14 of which are globally threatened, highlighting the importance of this area for bird conservation. INTRODUCTION RESULTS Recent studies have shown that East Asia and especially the Amur A total of 271 species was recorded inside Muraviovka Park between basin hold huge numbers of endangered species, and the region was 2011 and 2016; 24 species are listed as Near Treatened (NT), designated as a hotspot of threatened biodiversity (e.g. Vignieri 2014). Vulnerable (VU), Endangered (EN) or Critically Endangered (CR) Tis is especially true for birds. Te East Asian–Australasian Flyway (BirdLife International 2017a), 31 species in the Russian Red Data is not only one of the richest in species and individuals but is also the Book (Iliashenko & Iliashenko 2000) (Ru) and 60 species in the least surveyed and most threatened fyway (Yong et al. 2015). Current Amur region Red Data Book (Glushchenko et al. 2009) (Am). In data about distribution, population size and phenology are virtually the case of the Russian and Amur regional Red Data Books, the lacking for many regions, including the Amur region, Far East Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • To View the Apr/May Issue of the Sandpiper (Pdf)
    The andpiper APRIL/MAY 2018 Redwood Region Audubon Society www.rras.org S APRIL/MAY FIELD TRIPS Every Saturday: Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary. Sunday, April 8: Humboldt Bay National Wildlife carpooling available. Walks generally run 2-3 hours. All These are our famous, rain-or-shine, docent-led fi eld trips at Refuge. This is a wonderful 2-to 3-hour trip for people ages, abilities and interest levels welcome! For more the Marsh. Bring your binocular(s) and have a great morning wanting to learn the birds of the Humboldt Bay area. It information, please contact Melissa Dougherty at 530-859- birding! Meet in the parking lot at the end of South I Street takes a leisurely pace with emphasis on enjoying the birds! 1874 or email [email protected]. (Klopp Lake) in Arcata at 8:30 a.m. Trips end around 11 a.m. Beginners are more than welcome. Meet at the Refuge Walks led by: Cédric Duhalde (Apr 7); Cindy Moyer (Apr Visitor Center at 9 a.m. Call Jude Power (707-822- 3613) Saturday, April 14: Shorebird Workshop, Part 14); Michael Morris (Apr 21); Christine Keil (Apr 28). If you for more information. III at Del Norte Pier. Meet at 10 a.m. to watch the are interested in leading a Marsh walk, please contact Ken rising tide at the foot of W. Del Norte St. bring in waves Burton at [email protected]. Sunday, April 8: Shorebird Workshop, Part II of godwits, willets, turnstones, and curlews. Tide will turn at South Spit. First we’ll look for beach-loving around noon; we hope to see a good show by then.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcata Marsh & Wildlife Sanctuary Bird Checklist
    Arcata Marsh & Wildlife Sanctuary Bird Checklist Arcata, Humboldt County, California (Updated Fall 2014) The following list of 327 species was updated by Rob Fowler and David Fix in 2014 from the list they compiled in 2009. Data came from sightings entered in eBird; Stanley Harris's Northwest California Bird (2005, 1996, 1991); historical records in North American Birds magazine and its supporting unpublished Humboldt County summaries; the 2006 edition Arcata Marsh bird checklist (Elias Elias); the 1995 edition Arcata Marsh bird checklist (Kristina Van Wert); and personal communications with many birders. Formatting by Camden Bruner. Call the Northwest California Bird Alert at (707) 822-5666 to report or hear reports of rare birds! Abbreviations: A - Abundant; occurs in large numbers C - Common; likely to be found U - Uncommon; occurs in small numbers, found with seearching R - Rare; expected in very small numbers, not likely to be found Ca - Casual; several records, possibly may occur regularly Ac - Accidental; 1-3 records, not reasonably expected to occur Sp - Spring (Marsh - May) S - Summer (June to mid-July) F - Fall (mid-July through November) W - Winter (December through February) Here Waterfowl: Breeds Spring Summer Fall Winter _____ Greater White-fronted Goose R R R _____ Emperor Goose Ac _____ Snow Goose Ca Ca Ca _____ Ross's Goose Ca Ca Ca _____ Brant U Ac U R _____ Cackling Goose A U C _____ Canada Goose C C C C yes _____ Tundra Swan Ca Ca _____ Wood Duck U U U U yes _____ Gadwall C C C C yes _____ Eurasian Wigeon R U R _____
    [Show full text]
  • Annual General Meeting Season 2008 - 2009
    Annual General Meeting Season 2008 - 2009 AGENDA FOR ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING, 26 MAY 2009 1. Attendance & Apologies 2. Confirmation of Minutes of AGM held 21st May 2008 3. Business arising from 21st May 2008 meeting 4. Reports 5. Affiliation Fees for 2008/2009 Season 6. Election of Board Members 7. Confirmation of Sub-Committee Chairpersons for 2008/2009 8. Confirmation of Yachting Australia Delegates 9. Confirmation of Auditor 10. Close of Meeting 2008/09 Yachting SA Roll of Honour The Board of Yachting SA congratulates the following South Australian sailors on their outstanding achievements. YSA Awards for Season 2007/2008 Sailor of the Year ~ jointly awarded to Craig McPhee & Gillian Berry Junior Sailor of the Year ~ awarded jointly to Lauren Thredgold & Megan Soulsby Volunteer of the Year ~ awarded jointly to Gary Day & Greg Hampton President’s Award ~ jointly awarded to Les Harper & David Tillett 2008/2009 National Champions Australian Sharpie Malcolm Higgins Sam Sanderson Andrew Chisolm National Champion Brighton & Seacliff YC Brighton & Seacliff YC Brighton & Seacliff YC International Fireball Robins Inns Joel Coultas National Champion Adelaide SC Adelaide SC International 505 Alexander Higgins Jordan Spencer National Champion Brighton & Seacliff YC Brighton & Seacliff YC Laser Sean Homan Grand Master Adelaide SC National Champion Mosquito Mk II Cat. Warwick Kemp Emily Fink National Champion Adelaide SC Adelaide SC Yvonne 20 Paul Hawkins Graham Lovell National Champion Victor Harbor YC Victor Harbor YC Yachting SA Annual Report 2008/2009 May 2009 ITEM 1 Attendance & Apologies Attendance Register and Voting Rights All attendees are required to sign the attendance register before the meeting commences or upon arrival.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on Youth, Adults and Elder's Populations
    NUNAVIK — 2015 — NUNAVIK — 2015 — Author Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services With the collaboration of Institut national de santé publique du Québec Under the scientific coordination of Serge Déry, Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services Jérôme Martinez, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Faisca Richer, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Research and writing Faisca Richer, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Karine Garneau, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Michèle Boileau-Falardeau, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Andrew Gray, MD, Resident, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, McGill University Isabelle Duguay, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Ellen Bobet, Confluence research and writing Page Layout and graphics Hélène Fillion, Institut national de santé publique du Québec Front page photo credit Hans-Ludwig Blohm, Voices of the Natives, Fotoblohm.com Suggested Citation Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services with the collaboration of Institut national de santé publique du Québec (2014). Health Profile of Nunavik 2015: Focus on Youth, Adult and Elders’ Populations, Government of Québec, 90 pages and appendices. This document is available in its entirety in electronic format (PDF) on the Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services Web site and the Institut national de santé publique du Québec Web site at: www.inspq.qc.ca. Reproductions for private study or research purposes are authorized in virtue of Article 29 of the Copyright Act. Any other use must be authorized by the Government of Québec, which holds the exclusive intellectual property rights for this document. Authorization may be obtained by submitting a written request to Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Fish Edna Metabarcoding: Field Replicates Disproportionately Improve the Detection of Stream Associated Vertebrate Specie
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 2 3 Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates 4 disproportionately improve the detection of stream 5 associated vertebrate species 6 7 8 9 Till-Hendrik Macher1, Robin Schütz1, Jens Arle2, Arne J. Beermann1,3, Jan 10 Koschorreck2, Florian Leese1,3 11 12 13 1 University of Duisburg-Essen, Aquatic Ecosystem Research, Universitätsstr. 5, 45141 Essen, 14 Germany 15 2German Environmental Agency, Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany 16 3University of Duisburg-Essen, Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), Universitätsstr. 17 3, 45141 Essen, Germany 18 19 20 21 22 Keywords: birds, biomonitoring, bycatch, conservation, environmental DNA, mammals 23 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437227; this version posted March 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 24 Abstract 25 Fast, reliable, and comprehensive biodiversity monitoring data are needed for 26 environmental decision making and management. Recent work on fish environmental 27 DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding shows that aquatic diversity can be captured fast, reliably, 28 and non-invasively at moderate costs.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Record of Common Ringed Plover (Charadrius Hiaticula) in British Columbia
    The First Record of Common Ringed Plover (Charadrius hiaticula) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin. Submitted: April 15, 2019. Introduction and Distribution The Common Ringed Plover (Charadrius hiaticula) is a widespread Old World shorebird species that is found breeding in the Arctic and subarctic regions from Greenland, Europe, east to Siberia (O’Brien et al. 2006). In North America, this species breeds on Baffin Island, eastern Ellesmere Island (Godfrey 1986). The Common Ringed Plover winters primarily from Western Europe, the Mediterranean Basin, throughout Africa, including Madagascar, and the Middle East (Hayman et al. 1986, O’Brien et al. 2006, Brazil 2009). There are three recognized subspecies of the Common Ringed Plover (Thies et al. 2018). Distinction between the subspecies is based on moult; with features changing clinally North to South, rather than East to West, making it impossible to draw a dividing line in Northwestern Europe (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998). The nominate subspecies of Common Ringed Plover is (C. h. hiaticula ) which breeds from southern Scandinavia to Great Britain, and northwestern France (Wiersma et al. 2019). This subspecies winters from Great Britain, south into Africa (del Hoyo et al. 1996, Snow and Perrins 1998). The second subspecies of the Common Ringed Plover is (C. h. tundrae) which is found breeding from northern Scandinavia, and northern Russia east to the Chukotskiy Peninsula, and is a casual breeder also in the northern Bering Sea region of Alaska on St Lawrence Island (Wiersma et al. 2019). This subspecies winters in the Caspian Sea region, and from Southwest Asia, south and east to South Africa (Wiersma et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gouvernementaux Canada 1
    Public Works and Government Services Travaux publics et Services 1 Canada gouvernementaux Canada 1 RETURN BIDS TO: Title - Sujet RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: Paint Coating - CCGS Cap Aupaluk Réception des soumissions - TPSGC / Bid Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Date Receiving - PWGSC F3772-14N732/A 2015-03-10 1550, Avenue d'Estimauville 1550, D'Estimauville Avenue Client Reference No. - N° de référence du client GETS Ref. No. - N° de réf. de SEAG Québec F3772-14N732 PW-$QCN-006-16367 Québec File No. - N° de dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME G1J 0C7 QCN-4-37330 (006) Solicitation Closes - L'invitation prend fin Time Zone Fuseau horaire at - à 02:00 PM Heure Avancée de l'Est INVITATION TO TENDER on - le 2015-03-26 HAE APPEL D'OFFRES F.O.B. - F.A.B. Tender To: Public Works and Government Services Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: Canada Address Enquiries to: - Adresser toutes questions à: Buyer Id - Id de l'acheteur We hereby offer to sell to Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, in accordance with the terms and conditions set Lamarre, Jacynthe qcn006 out herein, referred to herein or attached hereto, the goods, Telephone No. - N° de téléphone FAX No. - N° de FAX services, and construction listed herein and on any attached (418) 649-2776 ( ) sheets at the price(s) set out therefor. (418) 648-2209 Destination - of Goods, Services, and Construction: Soumission aux: Travaux Publics et Services Gouvernementaux Canada Destination - des biens, services et construction: Nous offrons par la présente de vendre à Sa Majesté la NGCC CAP AUPALUK Reine du chef du Canada, aux conditions énoncées ou PÊCHES ET OCÉANS CANADA incluses par référence dans la présente et aux annexes GARDE CÔTIÈRE ci-jointes, les biens, services et construction énumérés 101 BOULEVARD CHAMPLAIN ici et sur toute feuille ci-annexée, au(x) prix indiqué(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary
    Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Management Plan DECEMBER 2016 | sanctuaries.noaa.gov/wisconsin/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator Kathryn D. Sullivan, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management National Ocean Service W. Russell Callender, Ph.D. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries John Armor, Director Matt Brookhart, Acting Deputy Director Cover Photos: Top: The schooner Walter B. Allen. Credit: Tamara Thomsen, Wisconsin Historical Society. Bottom: Photomosaic of the schooner Walter B. Allen. Credit: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution - Advanced Imaging and Visualization Laboratory. 1 Abstract In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA, 16 U.S.C. 1434 et seq.), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that considers alternatives for the proposed designation of Wisconsin - Lake Michigan as a National Marine Sanctuary. The proposed action addresses NOAA’s responsibilities under the NMSA to identify, designate, and protect areas of the marine and Great Lakes environment with special national significance due to their conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, scientific, cultural, archaeological, educational, or aesthetic qualities as national marine sanctuaries. ONMS has developed five alternatives for the designation, and the DEIS evaluates the environmental consequences of each under NEPA. The DEIS also serves as a resource assessment under the NMSA, documenting present and potential uses of the areas considered in the alternatives.
    [Show full text]