52759 CCLS Newsletter-SU10.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

52759 CCLS Newsletter-SU10.Indd 中國法律研究中心 Summer 2010 CENTER FOR CHINESE LEGAL STUDIES Innovative Seminar on Chinese Law, Society, and Governance Brings Leading Scholars to Campus By Christopher Gomes A semester-long interdisciplinary colloquium about Chinese law, “There is a lot of exciting work being done by scholars society, and governance attracted standing-room-only audiences on both contemporary law and society and on Chinese legal at Columbia Law School during the spring 2010 semester. history,” Liebman said. “But scholars and students in law, More than 35 students from the Law School and the Graduate history, and the social sciences do not talk to each other very School of Arts and Sciences were enrolled in the course often. This colloquium was one step toward fostering cross- “Chinese Law and Society.” But the public, other students, and disciplinary dialogue.” professors also attended to hear leading scholars discuss their Zelin, the Dean Lung Professor of Chinese Studies at China-focused research in this weekly colloquium. Columbia University, is working on a project about the legal Professors Benjamin Liebman and Madeleine Zelin invited 11 history of the Qing Dynasty. specialists from several fields, including history, law, and political This cross-disciplinary course was the first of its kind for science, to discuss topics ranging from justice in 17th-century the university and for the Center for Chinese Legal Studies. China to television as a campaign medium. Usually, the Center hosts at least one major event and a Liebman is director of the Center for Chinese Legal Studies, speaker series in the spring semester. This colloquium was which, along with the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, the first series law students could take for credit and for sponsored the events. Liebman’s research focuses on the role which readings were available to the public in advance of of media in the Chinese legal system, Chinese tort law, and the the speakers’ presentations. evolution of China’s courts and legal profession. Colloquium Presentations January 26 February 16 Concepts of Justice in Late Imperial China When Being Fair Means Breaking the Jonathan K. Ocko, Professor of History and Rules: Citizen Criteria for Procedural Department Head, North Carolina State Justice and State Legitimacy University, Raleigh Lily L. Tsai, Associate Professor, Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology February 2 Intelligence Wars: Security, Sovereignty, February 23 and Information in China, Ca. 1940 Citizen Complaints and Popular Klaus Mühlhahn, Professor of History, University Accountability Under Authoritarianism: of Indiana, Bloomington Evidence from Pre-1989 Eastern Europe and Post-1978 China February 9 Martin K. Dimitrov, Assistant Professor of Case Precedents in Qing China Government, Dartmouth Wang Zhiqiang, Professor of Law and Legal History, Fudan University Law School (continued on page 2) the Center for Chinese Legal Studies at Columbia law school Colloquium Presentations (continued from page 1) March 2 March 30 Speaking Law to Political-Economic Corporate Social Responsibility with Power: China’s Derivative Lawsuit Chinese Characteristics: Mechanism and the Limits of Private Law Advertising as a Means of Campaigning Nicholas C. Howson ’88, Assistant Professor on Chinese Television of Law, University of Michigan Law School Daniela Stockmann, Assistant Professor, Leiden University March 9 The Opacity of Texts: Reading Qing April 6 Judicial Narratives The Slippery Matter of Trademarks: Robert Hegel, Professor of Chinese and Copycat Soap Companies, the Question Comparative Literature, Washington University, of Authenticity, and Sino-British St. Louis Diplomacy in 1930s China Eugenia Y. Lean, Associate Professor of History, March 23 Columbia University Place and Petitioning in China: From the Qing Dynasty to the Reform Era April 13 Chen Xi, Assistant Professor, Political Science, The Exclusionary Rule in a State of Flux: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill China, Taiwan, and the United States Margaret K. Lewis, Associate Professor of Law, Seton Hall University It’s not the Law. It’s the Enforcement. Current Barriers to Effective Environmental Law in China China has more than thirty “China is rapidly losing eco-diversity and is plagued with administrative regulations and severe water and air pollution,” he said. “The problem isn’t that more than eighty rules to protect there aren’t enough laws. It’s that the laws are not enforced. This the environment and natural is because of the barriers to enforcement.” resources. Yet despite significant The six types of barriers he cited include institutional, progress in creating legislation systematic, financial, legislative, capacity, and human resources. governing the environment, A main institutional barrier is the incentive system for China continues to struggle to promotion in the centralized Party-State. A bureaucrat’s superior limit pollution. evaluates promotion based on economic growth. The problem The problem continues to be is that the costs of pollution are not factored into the equation, lack of enforcement, according thus creating a disincentive to use sustainable growth practices. to Mr. Feng Jia, who spoke at the Law School on March 29. Mr. There is also insufficient public participation in enforcement, Feng is a Ph.D. candidate at the China University of Political such as through litigation. Science and Law and was a visiting scholar at the Center for “Public participation through public interest litigation is an Chinese Legal Studies for the 2009-2010 year. Mr. Feng is also extremely effective way to support environmental protection an attorney for the China-based Center for Legal Assistance and regulation,” said Mr. Feng, “This is also a great way to to Pollution Victims (CLAPV). guarantee social harmony.” 2 the Center for Chinese Legal Studies at Columbia law school The 36th Annual Friedmann Conference Honors Jerome Cohen Professor and Practitioner Feted for Work on Human Rights and Rule of Law in China Jerome A. Cohen received the 2010 Wolfgang Friedmann In his speech, Professor Cohen addressed the wide range of Memorial Award on March 25 at Columbia Law School. He is challenges to the development of the rule of law in China. He a professor of law and co-director of the U.S.-Asia Law Institute shed light on the increasing pressures facing Chinese “rights of New York University Law School. lawyers” and others taking on sensitive cases. The Columbia Journal of Transnational Law recognized The conference, organized by the Columbia Society of Professor Cohen for his remarkable record of leadership in International Law, comprised three panels. The first was titled, the development of law in Asia. In making the award, Mark “How has China implemented its new anti-monopoly law?” and R. Shulman ’99, assistant dean for graduate programs and the second was “What role does the internet play in encouraging international affairs and adjunct professor of law at Pace free speech in China? What role should the U.S. play in fostering University, noted that Professor Cohen has worked tirelessly for Chinese free speech?” Professor Cohen sat on the third panel, half of a century to improve understanding and to promote “What is and should be the role of the legal profession in China?” greater adherence to the rule of law throughout this critical The Wolfgang Friedmann Memorial Award has been given region, most notably in the People’s Republic of China. He said annually since 1975 and recognizes an individual who has that as an insightful scholar and a zealous advocate on behalf of made outstanding contributions to the field of international law. commercial clients and human rights activists alike, Professor Past recipients include Sandra Day O’Connor, Professor Louis Cohen embodies Professor Wolfgang Friedmann’s legacy of Henkin, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, courage, intellect, and engagement. James A. Baker III, and Hans Blix. Columbia Law School Professors Celebrate 10 Years of Law School Clinic Development in China Professor Liebman and a mediation colleague, Margaret Shaw, were among the first few American clinical professors invited to China to talk about and demonstrate clinical pedagogy. Liebman and Shaw were at Tsinghua Law School, one of seven schools funded by the Ford Foundation to establish the first law school clinics in China. The professors also introduced basic lawyering skills—interviewing, case planning, client counseling and negotiation—at South Central University of Economics and Law (Zhongnan) Law School. Such clinics in part also help develop in students understanding of social justice and professional responsibility. (left to right): Carol B. Liebman and Barbara A. Schatz, both clinical professors of The following summer, Professor Liebman and Professor law at Columbia Law School Schatz returned, this time to Wuhan to work with the In June 2010, Carol B. Liebman and Barbara A. Schatz, both clinical faculties at the law schools at Zhongnan and Wuhan clinical professors of law at Columbia, returned to China to University. Columbia professors have gone to China every attend a conference in celebration of the tenth year of clinical few years to continue developing clinical programs. Recently, legal education in China. This is a history which the two Professor Schatz worked with the first clinic in China that professors helped build. deals with non-profit organizations. “Each time I return to China to meet with clinicians,” Today approximately 100 Chinese law schools offer clinics Professor Liebman said, “I have been impressed by the speed in subjects as diverse as environmental law, employment law, at which the clinical approach has been embraced by Chinese criminal law, women’s rights, administrative law and street law. law schools.” According to Professor Liebman, “The number seems likely Clinical legal education began in the year 2000, when to grow.” 3 the Center for Chinese Legal Studies at Columbia law school Edwards Fellows Seven Outstanding Scholars This year the Center for Chinese Legal Studies was pleased to particular attention to the influences of foreign models and award Edwards Fellowships to seven outstanding scholars. The local experience.
Recommended publications
  • Transboundary Damage in International Law
    This page intentionally left blank Transboundary Damage in International Law The Chernobyl disaster, the Amoco Cadiz oil spill and the Colorado River dispute are examples of an activity conducted by one State which has serious adverse effects in the territory of another, or in global common areas. This book details the international rules and compensation procedures, and is intended for use by governmental officials, international lawyers and jurists. It discusses existing laws on international liability and considers the underlying legal issues that require further development. It is one of the few books on the subject written from the perspective of a developing country with rapid economic and social development. xue hanqin is Director-General of the Law and Treaty Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China. She is one of the first women members of the International Law Commission. She has broad experience in both bilateral and multilateral negotiations of international treaties on various subjects of public international law. She is also a professor of law at the Beijing University School of Law and the College of Foreign Diplomacy of China, and Vice-President of the Chinese Society of International Law. She has written extensively on different issues of contemporary international law. cambridge studies in international and comparative law Established in 1946, this series produces high quality scholarship in the fields of public and private international law and comparative law. Although these are dis- tinct legal sub-disciplines, developments since 1946 confirm their interrelation. Comparative law is increasingly used as a tool in the making of law at national, regional, and international levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty Activities
    Faculty Activities left to right Bruce Ackerman Ian Ayres Jack M. Balkin Robert A. Burt Guido Calabresi Morris L. Cohen Bruce Ackerman 7, 2005, available at http://slate.msn.com/ Robert A. Burt Publications id/2114441/; Ask Iraqi Voters: Do You Want Lectures and Addresses The Art of Stealth, London Review of Us To Stay?, Hartford Courant, Jan. 28, Jewish Federation of New Haven,“The Books,Feb. 17, 2005, at 3; Loyal to Rumsfeld? 2005 (with B. Nalebuff); Going Soft on Jewish Presence in American Law”;The or the Constitution?, Am. Prospect, Microsoft? The EU’s Antitrust Case and Hastings Center,“The End of Autonomy in November 2004, at 6; Voting with Dollars Remedy, The Economists’Voice,Vol. 2: No. Biomedical Ethics.” (with comments by Barney Frank and Nick 2, Article 4 (2005) (with B. Nalebuff); Publications Littlefield), 57 Bull. Am. Acad. Arts & Sci., Encouraging Suggestive Behavior, Harv. Moral Offenses and Same Sex Relations: Summer 2004, at 18; Immune to Bus. Rev. 18 (December 2004), (with B. Revisiting the Hart-Devlin Debate, 1 Democracy, N.Y.Times, March 4, 2005, at Nalebuff); Should Heterosexuals Boycott Journal of Law 70 (2004); Review of A21 (with J. Ackerman); The Filibuster Rule: Marriage?, Issues in Legal Scholarship Jocelyn Downie, Dying Justice: A Case for Play by the Rules, Philadelphia Inquirer, (2004): Article 2 (with J. Brown); Decriminalizing Euthanasia and Assisted March 16, 2005; Em Defesa de uma Heranca Anonymously Yours, Worth 32 (November Suicide in Canada, 352 New Eng. J. Med. Social de Cidadania, in Ideias e Politicas 2004); Microsoft I: A Remedy Worthy of 1501 (2005).
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM To: Catherine Amirfar President, American Society
    OFFICERS Catherine Amirfar MEMORANDUM President Patrick Robinson Honorary President Mark David Agrast To: Catherine Amirfar Executive Vice President Andrea Bjorklund President, American Society of International Law David W. Bowker Marinn Carlson David J. Scheffer Vice Presidents From: Sean D. Murphy, Chair, 2020–2021 Nominating Committee James A.R. Nafziger Secretary Nancy L. Perkins Treasurer Date: October 29, 2020 Ronald J. Bettauer Assistant Treasurer Susan L. Karamanian Audit Committee Chair Re: ASIL 2020–2021 Nominating Committee Report Lori Fisler Damrosch Lucinda A. Low Sean D. Murphy Honorary Vice Presidents Nominees for Election at the 2021 Annual Meeting EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Members Julian Arato Perry S. Bechky The Nominating Committee proposes for election by the members of the Society pursuant Marney L. Cheek Kathleen E. Claussen to Section III (11) of the ASIL Regulations the following slate of Officers, Executive Council Jacob Katz Cogan Steven A. Crown Members, and Counsellors: Melissa J. Durkee Rebecca Hamilton Steven Hill 1 Christina Hioureas President-Elect Gregory Shaffer Rebecca Ingber Eric Talbot Jensen Aloysius Llamzon 2 Tiyanjana Maluwa Honorary President Hon. Patrick Robinson David H. Moore Tafadzwa Pasipanodya Patrick W. Pearsall 2 Mark A. Pollack Vice-Presidents Mark D. Agrast (Executive Vice President) Catherine Powell 2 Bruce C. Rashkow David W. Bowker Caroline S. Richard Sonia E. Rolland Anna Spain Bradley Elizabeth Trujillo Jarrod Wong James Thuo Gathii 2 Counsellors Hon. David J. Scheffer Diane Marie Amann Laurence Boisson de Chazournes Nicola Bonucci 3 John R. Crook Honorary Vice Presidents Sean D. Murphy Marcella David Timothy L. Dickinson Lucinda A. Low Brian Egan James T. Gathii Lori Fisler Damrosch Peter Mason M.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of U.S. Information Control in Post-War Germany
    The History of U.S. Information Control in Post-War Germany The History of U.S. Information Control in Post-War Germany: The Past Imperfect By Erwin J. Warkentin The History of U.S. Information Control in Post-War Germany: The Past Imperfect By Erwin J. Warkentin This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Erwin J. Warkentin All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-9749-3 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-9749-5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................................................................... ix Preface ......................................................................................................... x Abbreviations ........................................................................................... xiii Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter One ................................................................................................. 6 The Problem Defining the German Problem ............................................................... 6 Disunity among the Allies
    [Show full text]
  • International Court of Justice
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928 Website: www.icj-cij.org Press Release Unofficial No. 2010/29 10 September 2010 Swearing-in of two new Members of the Court at a public sitting on Monday 13 September 2010 at 10 a.m. THE HAGUE, 10 September 2010. The two Members of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) elected this year will be officially sworn in at a public sitting which will take place on Monday 13 September 2010 from 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace in The Hague, the seat of the Court. Ms Xue Hanqin, of Chinese nationality, and Ms Joan E. Donoghue, of American nationality, will each make before the Court the solemn declaration provided for in Article 20 of the Statute of the Court. Article 20 stipulates that “[e]very Member of the Court shall, before taking up his duties, make a solemn declaration in open court that he will exercise his powers impartially and conscientiously”. It is the first time in the Court’s history that two female judges will serve simultaneously. Elected as a Member of the Court on 29 June 2010 with immediate effect, Ms Xue Hanqin succeeded Mr. Shi Jiuyong (China), who resigned as of 28 May 2010. Pursuant to Article 15 of the Statute of the Court, Ms Xue will hold office for the remainder of Mr. Shi’s term, which will expire on 5 February 2012. Elected on 9 September 2010 with immediate effect, Ms Joan E.
    [Show full text]
  • American Journal of International Law
    American Journal of International Law VOLUME 66 1972 Published by The ^Z°UL>^ 11 American Society of International Law The American Society of International Law The American Society of International Law was organized in 1906 "to foster the study of international law and to promote the establishment and mainte­ nance of international relations on the basis of law and justice." The Society serves as a meeting place and forum for scholars, teachers, offi­ cials, lawyers and others, from some ninety-seven countries. At the end of April, it holds a three-day Annual Meeting in Washington at which current problems of international law are discussed. The Society also sponsors regional meetings outside of Washington in co-operation with other institutions. Salient questions of international law and relations are considered in depth by panels and study groups organized by the Society's Board of Review and Development. Works of scholarship are often published under the Society's auspices in connec­ tion with studies sponsored by the Board. The Society periodically issues three publications: The American Journal of International Law, the leading journal in the field of international law, has been published since 1907. A special number of the Journal carries the papers and discussions of the annual meeting of the Society. The Journal is distributed to all members of the Society without additional charge, and is available to non-members at a subscription rate of $30 a year. International Legal Materials, a bimonthly, is a unique international collection of texts of current official documents, including legislation, treaties, court deci­ sions, and reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France UNITED NATIONS Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 75039 Paris Cedex 01, France E-mail: : [email protected] Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 URL: www.iislweb.com E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 V.11-80947—March*1180947* 2011—475 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Structure of International Law: Unchanging
    "THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW"t UNCHANGING THEORY FOR INQUIRY MYRES S. McDOUGAL* W. MICHAEL REISMAN** Plus a change, plus c'est la "tnte chose.1 In recent decades the demand has become increasingly insistent among scholars and others for development of a more comprehensive theory of inquiry about international law, drawing upon all relevant areas of knowledge and especially upon the social sciences. 2 Early in his very ambitious book Professor Friedmann states that: The changes in the dimensions of international law require a corre- sponding reorientation in its study; neither the international lawyer trained in the classical methods of international law and diplomacy nor the corporation, tax, or constitutional lawyer are equipped to handle this subject without cooperation with each other, and with economists and political scientists. International law is becoming a more and more complex and many-sided subject.3 In bringing the book to a close, he reaffirms that basic changes in the "struc- ture of international society" make necessary a "far-reaching reorientation in the science and study of contemporary international law."4 For any who are as yet unconvinced of the exigency of this demand, Professor Friedmann's able and wide-ranging survey of almost all of the more important and controversial areas of contemporary international law may serve as compelling proof. By intention and example, this book makes a conclusive case for the view that an inter-disciplinary approach and an inter-disciplinary jurisprudence offer the only effective means for delimiting t By Wolfgang Friedmann. New York: Columbia University Press, 1964. PP.
    [Show full text]
  • International Law Asian Journal Of
    THE JOURNAL OF THE ASIAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1 JANUARY 2015 ISSN 2044-2513 Asian Journal of International Law Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 28 Sep 2021 at 01:22:03, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251314000381 Asian Journal of International Law The Asian Journal of International Law is the journal of the Asian Society of International Law. It publishes peer-reviewed scholarly articles and book reviews on public and private international law. The regional focus of the journal is broadly conceived. Some articles may focus specifically on Asian issues; others will bring one of the many Asian perspectives to bear on issues of global concern. Still others will be of more general interest to scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers located in or working on Asia. The journal is published in English as a matter of practical convenience rather than political endorsement. English language reviews of books in other languages are particularly welcomed. The journal is produced for the Asian Society of International Law by the National University of Singapore Faculty of Law and succeeds the Singapore Year Book of International Law. For further information, forthcoming pieces, and guidelines on how to submit articles or book reviews, please visit www.AsianJIL.org. instructions for contributors The Asian Journal of International Law welcomes unsolicited articles and proposals for book reviews. For details, visit www.AsianJIL.org. © Asian Journal of International Law ISSN 2044-2513 E-ISSN 2044-2521 This journal issue has been printed on FSC-certified paper and cover board.
    [Show full text]
  • International Court of Justice Handbook
    INT Handbook 2019.qxp_Mise en page 1 06/11/2019 09:35 Page 1 INT Handbook 2019.qxp_Mise en page 1 06/11/2019 09:35 Page 2 ISBN 978-92-1-157364-0 Sales number No de vente : 1162 INT Handbook 2019.qxp_Mise en page 1 06/11/2019 09:35 Page 3 The International Court of Justice Handbook INT Handbook 2019.qxp_Mise en page 1 06/11/2019 09:35 Page 4 INT Handbook 2019.qxp_Mise en page 1 06/11/2019 09:35 Page 5 Foreword The role of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which has its seat in The Hague (Netherlands), is to settle in accordance with international law disputes submitted to it by States. In addition, certain international organs and agencies are entitled to call upon it for advisory opinions. Also known as the “World Court”, the ICJ is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It was set up in June 1945 under the Charter of the United Nations and began its activities in April 1946. The ICJ is the highest court in the world and the only one with both general and universal jurisdiction : it is open to all Member States of the United Nations and, subject to the provisions of its Statute, may entertain any question of inter- national law. The ICJ should not be confused with the other — mostly criminal — interna- tional judicial institutions based in The Hague, which were established much more recently, for example the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY, an ad hoc court created by the Security Council and which operated from 1993 to 2017) or the International Criminal Court (ICC, the first permanent inter- national criminal court, established by treaty, which does not belong to the United Nations system).
    [Show full text]
  • The 59Th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space at the 67Th International Astronautical Congress
    The 59th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space at the 67th International Astronautical Congress * Christopher D. JOHNSON The 59th International Institute of Space Law (IISL) Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space was held from 27–30 September 2016 in Guadalajara, Mexico, in conjunction with the 67th International Astronautical Congress (IAC). Comprised of seven technical sessions and one session for interactive presentations, the Colloquium focused on a range of thematic issues in space law, and featured papers from almost seventy presenters. Topics discussed included the legal aspects related to the remote sensing principles, regional cooperation and Latin American space activities, large satellite constellations, space resource utilization, planetary defence, and spectrum management. The 8th Nandasiri Jasentuliyana Keynote Lecture was delivered by incoming IISL president Kai-Uwe Schrogl, entitled ‘Space Law and Diplomacy’. The Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court semi-finals and world finals were also held in Guadalajara, as well the General Assembly of the IISL. 1 THE 59TH IISL COLLOQUIUM ON THE LAW OF OUTER SPACE The 59th International Institute of Space Law (IISL) Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space was held from 27–30 September 2016 in Guadalajara, Mexico, in conjunction with the 67th International Astronautical Congress (IAC). The Colloquium began with the 8th Nandasiri Jasentuliyana Keynote Lecture, which was delivered by the incoming IISL President, Kai Uwe-Schrogl, entitled ‘Space Law and Diplomacy’. In his lecture, Dr Schrogl spoke about space law as the historical subject of diplomacy, and of space activities driving and assisting diplomacy. Today, in consideration of future space activities by more numerous and diverse actors doing more advanced activities, Dr Schrogl raised the question as to whether the current space law regime requires expansion and elaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • William AP Martin and a History of International Law for China
    Journal of the history of International Law 22 (2020) 269–305 brill.com/jhil The Politics of History in the Late Qing Era: William A. P. Martin and a History of International Law for China Maria Adele Carrai Assistant Professor of Global China Studies, New York University Shanghai, Pudong, Shanghai, China [email protected] Received: 12 March 2019 | Revised: 18 November 2019 | Accepted: 30 January 2020 | Published online: 28 October 2020 Abstract In the light of 19th-century attempts to universalize history and international law, the purpose of this article is to show how the theory of an Ancient Chinese inter- national law matured and disseminated within one politics of history and helped generate another at the end of the Qing Dynasty. On the one hand, the middleman William Alexander Parsons Martin, who as part of his Christian mission and in order to make international law more acceptable to the Chinese, translated systematically international law into Chinese and attempted to universalize it by finding a proto- international law in Ancient China. On the other hand, Chinese scholars and officials sought to use Martin’s theory to universalize Confucianism and rectify international law according to what they believed to be their own superior morality and history. Keywords international law – W. A. P. Martin – translation – Confucianism – history – politics – China 1 Introduction More than neutral descriptions of past events, histories of international law are often normative reconstructions responding to contemporary necessities. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/15718050-12340152Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 06:04:24AM via free access 270 Carrai In the 19th century, Western powers’ expansion forced them into contact with cultures and civilizations that shared little in common with Christianity.
    [Show full text]