DOCSLIB.ORG

Element Status Designations by Common Name Arizona Game and Fish Department, Heritage Data Management System Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Element Status Designations by Common Name Arizona Game and Fish Department, Heritage Data Management System Update Element Status Designations by Common Name Arizona Game and Fish Department, Heritage Data Management System Updated: 7/5/2019 COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME ELCODE ESA DATE CRITHAB BLM USFS NESL MEXFED SGCN NPL SRANK GRANK TRACK TAXON A Arizona‐Mexican Orange Choisya arizonica var. amplophylla PDRUT02031 S2 G4TNR Y Plant A Balsamroot Balsamorhiza hookeri var. hispidula PDAST11041 S1 G5T3T5 Y Plant A Blueberry Bee Osmia ribifloris IIHYMA2570 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Buckmoth Hemileuca grotei IILEW0M070 S? G4 N Invertebrate A Buckmoth Hemileuca grotei diana IILEW0M072 S? G4T3T4 Y Invertebrate A Bumble Bee Bombus centralis IIHYM24100 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Bumble Bee Bombus fervidus IIHYM24110 S? G4? Y Invertebrate A Bumble Bee Bombus flavifrons IIHYM24120 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Bumble Bee Bombus huntii IIHYM24140 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Bumble Bee Bombus melanopygus IIHYM24150 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Bumble Bee Bombus nevadensis IIHYM24170 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Bumble Bee Bombus morrisoni IIHYM24460 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Bushtail Caddisfly Gumaga griseola IITRI53010 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Bushtailed Caddisfly Gumaga nigricula IITRI53020 S? G3G4 Y Invertebrate A Buttercup Ranunculus inamoenus var. subaffinis PDRAN0L1C3 S1 G5T1 Y Plant A Caddisfly Lepidostoma acarolum IITRI01140 S? G2G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Lepidostoma apornum IITRI01150 S? G2G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Lepidostoma knulli IITRI01280 S S1 G2G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Lepidostoma lacinatum IITRI01290 S1 G3G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Lepidostoma mexicanum IITRI01340 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Lepidostoma ormeum IITRI01450 S1 G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Chimarra adella IITRI03110 S? G2G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Chimarra primula IITRI03150 S? G1G2 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Chimarra schiza IITRI03160 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Chimarra texana IITRI03170 S3S4 G5 W Invertebrate A Caddisfly Chimarra ridleyi IITRI03190 S? G3G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Chimarra utahensis IITRI03210 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Polycentropus arizonensis IITRI05260 S? G2G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Polycentropus gertschi IITRI05300 S? G2G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Polycentropus halidus IITRI05380 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Tinodes consuetus IITRI06040 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Tinodes parvulus IITRI06060 S? G2G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Apatania arizona IITRI10030 S? G1G2 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus moestus IITRI15060 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus abbreviatus IITRI15110 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus acnestus IITRI15120 S? G2G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus apache IITRI15190 S? G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus arizona IITRI15220 S? G3G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus assimilis IITRI15230 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus granti IITRI15400 S S1 G1 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus rothi IITRI15530 S? G3G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus sperryi IITRI15600 S? G2 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus tulatus IITRI15640 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus lithus IITRI15710 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus sp. 1 IITRI15740 S? G1G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Oligophlebodes minutus IITRI17050 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Rhyacophila chordata IITRI19520 S? G3G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Micrasema arizonicum IITRI20100 S? G1G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Micrasema onisca IITRI20150 S? G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Cheumatopsyche campyla IITRI22170 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Cheumatopsyche lasia IITRI22240 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Cheumatopsyche gelita IITRI22290 S? G3G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Cheumatopsyche pinula IITRI22330 S? G3G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Cheumatopsyche arizonensis IITRI22380 S? G5 Y Invertebrate 1 Element Status Designations by Common Name Arizona Game and Fish Department, Heritage Data Management System Updated: 7/5/2019 COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME ELCODE ESA DATE CRITHAB BLM USFS NESL MEXFED SGCN NPL SRANK GRANK TRACK TAXON A Caddisfly Cheumatopsyche enonis IITRI22390 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Hydropsyche auricolor IITRI25330 S2 G4 Y Invertebrate A caddisfly Hydropsyche occidentalis IITRI25460 S2S3 G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Triaenodes tardus IITRI2F200 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Oecetis avara IITRI2G090 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Oecetis inconspicua IITRI2G120 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Oecetis arizonica IITRI2G170 S? G3G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Oecetis disjuncta IITRI2G260 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Oecetis metlacensis IITRI2G270 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Oecetis sp. G IITRI2G310 S? G1G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Agapetus boulderensis IITRI33190 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Protoptila erotica IITRI34020 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Hydropsyche protis IITRI36160 S? GU Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Hydropsyche venada IITRI36200 S2 G2G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Hydroptila rono IITRI40020 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Hydroptila consimilis IITRI40290 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Hydroptila hamata IITRI40430 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Hydroptila modica IITRI40820 S? G3G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Hydroptila arctia IITRI40930 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Hydroptila icona IITRI40950 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia tarsalis IITRI41200 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia argentea IITRI41280 S? G1G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia arizonica IITRI41290 S? G3G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia dactylophora IITRI41330 S? G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia ildria IITRI41380 S? G2G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia nigritta IITRI41420 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia quadrispina IITRI41450 S? G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia rothi IITRI41470 S? G1G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia spinulata IITRI41490 S? G2G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia stylata IITRI41550 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Oxyethira dualis IITRI42120 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Oxyethira pallida IITRI42180 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Neotrichia osmena IITRI50200 S1 G3G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Cnodocentron yavapai IITRI63410 S1 GNR Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Smicridea signata IITRI63660 S? G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Hydroptila pecos IITRI63740 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Leucotrichia limpia IITRI63820 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Leucotrichia sarita IITRI63830 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Metrichia arizonensis IITRI63840 S? G1G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Neotrichia halia IITRI63860 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia logana IITRI63870 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ochrotrichia lometa IITRI63880 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Oxyethira aculea IITRI63920 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Oxyethira arizona IITRI63950 S? G2G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Stactobiella brustia IITRI64040 S? G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Lepidostoma bakeri IITRI64060 S? GU Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Lepidostoma pluviale IITRI64170 S1? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Lepidostoma unicolor IITRI64270 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Nectopsyche dorsalis IITRI64390 S? G1G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Nectopsyche gracilis IITRI64410 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Nectopsyche minuta IITRI64430 S? G3G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus diversus IITRI64970 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A caddisfly Lepidostoma apache IITRI64A10 S S1 G1 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Limnephilus frijole IITRI65040 S? G5 Y Invertebrate 2 Element Status Designations by Common Name Arizona Game and Fish Department, Heritage Data Management System Updated: 7/5/2019 COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME ELCODE ESA DATE CRITHAB BLM USFS NESL MEXFED SGCN NPL SRANK GRANK TRACK TAXON A Caddisfly Limnephilus spinatus IITRI65270 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Chimarra angustipennis IITRI65520 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Dolophilodes novusamericana IITRI65580 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Polycentropus variegatus IITRI65890 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Tinodes provo IITRI65940 S? G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Rhyacophila coloradensis IITRI66020 S? G5 N Invertebrate A Caddisfly Rhyacophila coloradensis coloradensis IITRI66021 S? G5T5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Rhyacophila rotunda IITRI66540 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Micrasema bactro IITRI66770 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Smicridea fasciatella IITRI66780 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Wormaldia arizonensis IITRI78070 S? G2G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Wormaldia planae IITRI78190 S S1 G2 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Psychomyia flavida IITRI82010 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Glossosoma ventrale IITRI83160 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ithytrichia clavata IITRI84010 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Ithytrichia mexicana IITRI84030 S? G3 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Nectopsyche stigmatica IITRI85090 S? G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Helicopsyche borealis IITRI96020 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Helicopsyche mexicana IITRI96050 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Anabolia bimaculata IITRIA8020 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Mayatrichia ayama IITRIB4010 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Clistoronia maculata IITRIC5010 S? G3G4 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Clistoronia formosa IITRIC5030 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Phylloicus mexicanus IITRID1030 S? G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Culoptila kimminsi IITRID3010 S? G1G2 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Culoptila moselyi IITRID3020 S? G1G2 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Culoptila thoracica IITRID3030 S? G4G5 Y Invertebrate A Caddisfly Culoptila cantha IITRID3040 S? G5 Y Invertebrate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Off-Road Vehicle Plan
    United States Department of Agriculture Final Environmental Assessment Forest Service Tusayan Ranger District Travel Management Project April 2009 Southwestern Region Tusayan Ranger District Kaibab National Forest Coconino County, Arizona Information Contact: Charlotte Minor, IDT Leader Kaibab National Forest 800 S. Sixth Street, Williams, AZ 86046 928-635-8271 or fax: 928-635-8208 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternate means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper Chapter 1 5 Document Structure 5 Introduction 5 Background 8 Purpose and Need 10 Existing Condition 10 Desired Condition 12 Proposed Action 13 Decision Framework 15 Issues 15 Chapter 2 - Alternatives 17 Alternatives Analyzed
    [Show full text]
  • The Plant Press the ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
    The Plant Press THE ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 1 Summer 2013 In this Issue: Plants of the Madrean Archipelago 1-4 Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Conference 5-8 Abstracts of Botanical Papers Presented in the Madrean Archipelago Conference Southwest Coralbean (Erythrina flabelliformis). Plus 11-19 Conservation Priority Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Setting for Arizona G1 Conference and G2 Plant Species: A Regional Assessment by Thomas R. Van Devender1. Photos courtesy the author. & Our Regular Features Today the term ‘bioblitz’ is popular, meaning an intensive effort in a short period to document the diversity of animals and plants in an area. The first bioblitz in the southwestern 2 President’s Note United States was the 1848-1855 survey of the new boundary between the United States and Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 ended the Mexican-American War. 8 Who’s Who at AZNPS The border between El Paso, Texas and the Colorado River in Arizona was surveyed in 1855- 9 & 17 Book Reviews 1856, following the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Besides surveying and marking the border with monuments, these were expeditions that made extensive animal and plant collections, 10 Spotlight on a Native often by U.S. Army physicians. Botanists John M. Bigelow (Charphochaete bigelovii), Charles Plant C. Parry (Agave parryi), Arthur C. V. Schott (Stephanomeria schotti), Edmund K. Smith (Rhamnus smithii), George Thurber (Stenocereus thurberi), and Charles Wright (Cheilanthes wrightii) made the first systematic plant collection in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. ©2013 Arizona Native Plant In 1892-94, Edgar A. Mearns collected 30,000 animal and plant specimens on the second Society.
    [Show full text]
  • ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona
    October 2015 BLM DOI-BLM-AZ-0000-2013-0001-EA ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona Final Environmental Assessment Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona DOI-BLM-AZ-0000-2013-0001-EA Bureau of Land Management Arizona State Office One North Central Avenue, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4427 October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. iii Acronym List ................................................................................................................................... iv Section 1 – Proposed Action, Purpose and Need, and Background Information ........................... 1 1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Proposed Action Overview ............................................................................................... 3 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Fish Species
    The Angler’s Guide To TennesseeIncluding Aquatic Nuisance SpeciesFish Published by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Cover photograph Paul Shaw Graphics Designer Raleigh Holtam Thanks to the TWRA Fisheries Staff for their review and contributions to this publication. Special thanks to those that provided pictures for use in this publication. Partial funding of this publication was provided by a grant from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Authorization No. 328898, 58,500 copies, January, 2012. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $.42 per copy. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is available to all persons without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, dis- ability, or military service. TWRA is also an equal opportunity/equal access employer. Questions should be directed to TWRA, Human Resources Office, P.O. Box 40747, Nashville, TN 37204, (615) 781-6594 (TDD 781-6691), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Human Resources, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203. Contents Introduction ...............................................................................1 About Fish ..................................................................................2 Black Bass ...................................................................................3 Crappie ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Southwestern Region Draft Land and Resource MB-R3-05-7 October 2013 Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Front cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Meadow Valley in the Huachuca Ecosystem Management Area; saguaros in the Galiuro Mountains; deer herd; aspen on Mt. Lemmon; Riggs Lake; Dragoon Mountains; Santa Rita Mountains “sky island”; San Rafael grasslands; historic building in Cave Creek Canyon; golden columbine flowers; and camping at Rose Canyon Campground. Printed on recycled paper • October 2013 Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard, SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] Contents Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Island Ridge Management Plan
    Pine Island Ridge Conservation Management Plan Broward County Parks and Recreation May 2020 Update of 1999 Management Plan Table of Contents A. General Information ..............................................................................................................3 B. Natural and Cultural Resources ...........................................................................................8 C. Use of the Property ..............................................................................................................13 D. Management Activities ........................................................................................................18 E. Works Cited ..........................................................................................................................29 List of Tables Table 1. Management Goals…………………………………………………………………21 Table 2. Estimated Costs……………………………………………………………….........27 List of Attachments Appendix A. Pine Island Ridge Lease 4005……………………………………………... A-1 Appendix B. Property Deeds………….............................................................................. B-1 Appendix C. Pine Island Ridge Improvements………………………………………….. C-1 Appendix D. Conservation Lands within 10 miles of Pine Island Ridge Park………….. D-1 Appendix E. 1948 Aerial Photograph……………………………………………………. E-1 Appendix F. Development Agreement………………………………………………….. F-1 Appendix G. Plant Species Observed at Pine Island Ridge……………………………… G-1 Appendix H. Wildlife Species Observed at Pine Island Ridge ……... …………………. H-1 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Multilocus Assessment of Sparrow (Aves: Passerellidae) Relationships ⇑ John Klicka A, , F
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 77 (2014) 177–182 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Short Communication A comprehensive multilocus assessment of sparrow (Aves: Passerellidae) relationships ⇑ John Klicka a, , F. Keith Barker b,c, Kevin J. Burns d, Scott M. Lanyon b, Irby J. Lovette e, Jaime A. Chaves f,g, Robert W. Bryson Jr. a a Department of Biology and Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, Box 353010, Seattle, WA 98195-3010, USA b Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology Building, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA c Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology Building, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA d Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA e Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, 159 Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, NY 14950, USA f Department of Biology, University of Miami, 1301 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA g Universidad San Francisco de Quito, USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, y Extensión Galápagos, Campus Cumbayá, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito, Ecuador article info abstract Article history: The New World sparrows (Emberizidae) are among the best known of songbird groups and have long- Received 6 November 2013 been recognized as one of the prominent components of the New World nine-primaried oscine assem- Revised 16 April 2014 blage. Despite receiving much attention from taxonomists over the years, and only recently using molec- Accepted 21 April 2014 ular methods, was a ‘‘core’’ sparrow clade established allowing the reconstruction of a phylogenetic Available online 30 April 2014 hypothesis that includes the full sampling of sparrow species diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus Elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications Summer 2020 Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River Dakota S. Radford Eastern Illinois University Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Radford, Dakota S., "Aging Techniques & Population Dynamics of Blue Suckers (Cycleptus elongatus) in the Lower Wabash River" (2020). Masters Theses. 4806. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/4806 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AGING TECHNIQUES & POPULATION DYNAMICS OF BLUE SUCKERS (CYCLEPTUS ELONGATUS) IN THE LOWER WABASH RIVER By Dakota S. Radford B.S. Environmental Biology Eastern Illinois University A thesis prepared for the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Biological Sciences Eastern Illinois University May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Thesis abstract .................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv List of Tables .......................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • St.Marks National Wildlife Refuge Butterfly Checklist
    St.Marks National Wildlife Refuge Butterfly Checklist Assembled by Stacy Hurst, Richard G. RuBino, and Karla Brandt September 2002 Sponsored by the St. Marks Refuge Association, Inc. For more information on butterflies and other wildlife on the refuge, contact: St. Marks NationalWildlife Refuge 1255 Lighthouse Road, St. Marks, FL 32355 (850) 925-6121 http://saintmarks.fws.gov Sunset photo by Shawn Gillette, St. Marks NWR Inside photographs are reproduced by permission of Paul A. Opier l^ong-tailed Skipper (Urbanusproteus) - May-Nov; brushy or disturbed areas Silver-spotted Skipper (Epargyreus clarus) - Mar-Oct; open areas Milkweed Butterflies Monarch (Danaus plexippus) - Apr & Oct-Nov; open fields; clusters in trees ©Paul A. Opler ©Paul A Opler ©Paul A Opler ©Paul A. Opler Queen (Danaus gilippus) - Apr-Sep; open areas, brushy fields, roadsides Zebra Swallowtail Palamedes Swallowtail Gulf Fritillary American Lady Other Butterflies This checklist includes the most common species of butterflies found at St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, the time of year they might be seen on the American Lady (Vanessa virginiensis) - Mar-May & Sep-Oct; open spaces refuge, and their habitat preferences. Carolina Satyr (Hermeuptychia sosybius) - Mar-Nov; open fields, wooded Swallowtails areas Black Swallowtail (Papilio polyxenes) - Jun-Nov; open fields, tidal Common Buckeye (Junonia coenia) - May-Nov; open fields, pine woods marshes Common Wood Nymph (Cercyonis pegala) -May-Sep; moist, grassy areas Eastern Tiger Swallowtail (Papilio glaucus) - Apr-Nov; edge of Common Buckeye deciduous woods Gemmed Satyr (Cyllopsis gemma) - May-Nov; moist grassy areas Giant Swallowtail (Papilio cresphontes) - Apr-Oct; woodlands and fields Georgia Satyr (Neonympha areolata) - Mar-Apr & Sep-Oct; open pine OPaul A.
    [Show full text]
  • Site-Specific Environmental Assessment
    Environmental Assessment Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program ARIZONA EA Number: AZ-20-01 Site-Specific Graham and Gila County portion within the San Carlos Apache Reservation; Mohave County Hualapai Reservation; Cochise County portion of Coronado National Forest – Winchester Mountains Prepared by: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 3640 East Wier Ave. Phoenix, Arizona 85040 May 6, 2020 1 Table of Contents I. Need for Proposed Action ...................................................................................................... 4 A. Purpose and Need Statement .............................................................................................. 4 B. Background Discussion ...................................................................................................... 5 C. About This Process ............................................................................................................. 7 II. Alternatives ............................................................................................................................ 7 A. No Action Alternative ......................................................................................................... 8 B. Insecticide Applications at Conventional Rates or Reduced Agent Area Treatments with Adaptive Management Strategy (Preferred Alternative) .......................................................................... 8 C. Experimental Treatments Alternative ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]