ARM Architecture from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ARM Architecture from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia ARM architecture From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ARM is a family of instruction set architectures for computer ARM architectures processors based on a reduced instruction set computing (RISC) architecture developed by British company ARM Holdings. A RISC-based computer design approach means ARM The ARM logo processors require significantly fewer transistors than typical Designer ARM Holdings CISC x86 processors in most personal computers. This approach reduces costs, heat and power use. These are Bits 32-bit, 64-bit ​ desirable traits for light, portable, battery-powered devices— Introduced 1985 including smartphones, laptops, tablet and notepad computers, and other embedded systems. A simpler design Design RISC facilitates more efficient multi-core CPUs and higher core Type Register-Register counts at lower cost, providing improved energy efficiency Branching Condition code for servers.[3][4][5] Open Proprietary ARM Holdings develops the instruction set and architecture for ARM-based products, but does not manufacture 64/32-bit architecture products. The company periodically releases updates to its Introduced 2011 cores. Current cores from ARM Holdings support a 32-bit address space and 32-bit arithmetic; the ARMv8-A Version ARMv8-A architecture, announced in October 2011,[6] adds support Encoding AArch64/A64 and AArch32/A32 use for a 64-bit address space and 64-bit arithmetic. Instructions 32-bit instructions, T32 (Thumb2) for ARM Holdings' cores have 32-bit-wide fixed-length uses mixed 16- and 32-bit instructions. instructions, but later versions of the architecture also support ARMv7 user-space compatibility[1] a variable-length instruction set that provides both 32-bit and 16-bit-wide instructions for improved code density. Some Endianness Bi (Little as default) cores can also provide hardware execution of Java Extensions All mandatory: Thumb-2, NEON, bytecodes. Jazelle, VFPv4-D16, VFPv4 ARM Holdings licenses the chip designs and the ARM Registers instruction set architectures to third-parties, who design their General 31x 64-bit integer registers[1] plus PC ​ own products that implement one of those architectures— purpose including systems-on-chips (SoC) that incorporate memory, and SP, ELR, SPSR for exception interfaces, radios, etc. Currently, the widely used Cortex levels cores, older "classic" cores, and specialized SecurCore cores Floating 32× 128-bit registers,[1] scalar 32- and variants are available for each of these to include or exclude point 64-bit FP, SIMD 64- and 128-bit FP optional capabilities. Companies that produce ARM and integer products include Apple, Nvidia, Qualcomm, Rockchip, Samsung Electronics, and Texas Instruments. Apple first implemented the ARMv8-A architecture in the Apple A7 32-bit architectures (Cortex) chip in the iPhone 5S. Version ARMv8-R, ARMv7-A, ARMv7-R, ARMv7E-M, ARMv7-M, ARMv6-M In 2005, about 98% of all mobile phones sold used at least Encoding 32-bit except Thumb2 extensions use one ARM processor.[7] The low power consumption of mixed 16- and 32-bit instructions. ARM processors has made them very popular: 37 billion Endianness Bi (Little as default) ARM processors have been produced as of 2013, up from Extensions Thumb-2 (mandatory since ARMv7), 10 billion in 2008.[8] The ARM architecture (32-bit) is the most widely used architecture in mobile devices, and most NEON, Jazelle, FPv4-SP popular 32-bit one in embedded systems.[9] Registers General 16x 32-bit integer registers including According to ARM Holdings, in 2010 alone, producers of purpose PC and SP chips based on ARM architectures reported shipments of 6.1 billion ARM-based processors, representing 95% of Floating Up to 32× 64-bit registers,[2] smartphones, 35% of digital televisions and set-top boxes point SIMD/floating-point (optional) and 10% of mobile computers. It is the most widely used 32- bit instruction set architecture in terms of quantity 32-bit architectures (legacy) produced.[10][11] Version ARMv6, ARMv5, ARMv4T, ARMv3, ARMv2 Contents Encoding 32-bit except Thumb extension uses mixed 16- and 32-bit instructions. 1 History Endianness Bi (Little as default) in ARMv3 and 1.1 Acorn RISC Machine: ARM2 above 1.2 Apple, DEC, Intel, Marvell: ARM6, Extensions Thumb, Jazelle StrongARM, XScale Registers 2 Licensing 2.1 Core license General 16x 32-bit integer registers including 2.2 Architectural licence purpose PC (26-bit addressing in older) and SP 3 Cores 3.1 Example applications of ARM cores 4 32-bit architecture 4.1 CPU modes 4.2 Instruction set 4.2.1 Arithmetic instructions 4.2.2 Registers 4.2.3 Conditional execution 4.2.4 Other features 4.2.5 Pipelines and other implementation issues 4.2.6 Coprocessors 4.3 Debugging 4.4 DSP enhancement instructions 4.5 SIMD extensions for multimedia 4.6 Jazelle 4.7 Thumb 4.8 Thumb-2 4.9 Thumb Execution Environment (ThumbEE) (ThumbEE) 4.10 Floating-point (VFP) 4.11 Advanced SIMD (NEON) 4.12 Security extensions (TrustZone) 4.13 No-execute page protection 4.14 ARMv8-R 5 64/32-bit architecture 5.1 ARMv8-A 5.1.1 AArch64 features 6 Operating system support 6.1 32-bit operating systems 6.2 64-bit operating systems 7 See also 8 References 9 Further reading 10 External links History The British computer manufacturer Acorn Computers first developed ARM in the 1980s to use in its personal computers. Its first ARM-based products were coprocessor modules for the BBC Micro series of computers. After the successful BBC Micro computer, Acorn Computers considered how to move on from the relatively simple MOS Technology 6502 processor to address business markets like the one that was soon dominated by the IBM PC, launched in 1981. The Acorn Business Computer (ABC) plan required that a number of second processors be made to work with the BBC Micro platform, but processors such as the Motorola 68000 and National Semiconductor 32016 were considered unsuitable, and the 6502 was not powerful enough for a graphics based user interface.[12] After testing all available processors and finding them lacking, Acorn decided it needed a new architecture. Inspired by white papers on the Berkeley RISC project, Acorn considered designing its own processor.[13] A visit to Microprocessor-based system on a chip the Western Design Center in Phoenix, where the 6502 was being updated by what was effectively a single-person company, showed Acorn engineers Steve Furber and Sophie Wilson they did not need massive resources and state-of-the-art research and development facilities.[14] Wilson developed the instruction set, writing a simulation of the processor in BBC Basic that ran on a BBC Micro with a second 6502 processor. This convinced Acorn engineers they were on the right track. Wilson approached Acorn's CEO, Hermann Hauser, and requested more resources. Once he had approval, he assembled a small team to implement Wilson's model in hardware. Acorn RISC Machine: ARM2 The official Acorn RISC Machine project started in October 1983. They chose VLSI Technology as the silicon partner, as they were a source of ROMs and custom chips for Acorn. Wilson and Furber led the design. They implemented it with a similar efficiency ethos as the 6502.[15] A key design goal was achieving low-latency input/output (interrupt) handling like the 6502. The 6502's memory access architecture had let developers produce fast machines without costly direct memory access hardware. The ARM1 second processor for the BBC Micro VLSI produced the first ARM silicon on 26 April 1985. It worked the first time, and was known as ARM1 by April 1985.[3] The first production systems named ARM2 were available the following year. The first ARM application was as a second processor for the BBC Micro, where it helped in developing simulation software to finish development of the support chips (VIDC, IOC, MEMC), and sped up the CAD software used in ARM2 development. Wilson subsequently rewrote BBC Basic in ARM assembly language. The in-depth knowledge gained from designing the instruction set enabled the code to be very dense, making ARM BBC Basic an extremely good test for any ARM emulator. The original aim of a principally ARM-based computer was achieved in 1987 with the release of the Acorn Archimedes.[16] In 1992, Acorn once more won the Queen's Award for Technology for the ARM. The ARM2 featured a 32-bit data bus, 26-bit address space and 27 32-bit registers. 8 bits from the program counter register were available for other purposes; the top 6 bits (available because of the 26-bit address space), served as status flags, and the bottom 2 bits (available because the program counter was always word-aligned), were used for setting modes. The address bus was extended to 32 bits in the ARM6, but program code still had to lie within the first 64 MB of memory in 26-bit compatibility mode, due to the reserved bits for the status flags.[17] The ARM2 had a transistor count of just 30,000, compared to Motorola's six-year-older 68000 model with 68,000.[18] Much of this simplicity came from the lack of microcode (which represents about one-quarter to one- third of the 68000) and from (like most CPUs of the day) not including any cache. This simplicity enabled low power consumption, yet better performance than the Intel 80286. A successor, ARM3, was produced with a 4 KB cache, which further improved performance.[19] Apple, DEC, Intel, Marvell: ARM6, StrongARM, XScale In the late 1980s Apple Computer and VLSI Technology started working with Acorn on newer versions of the ARM core. In 1990, Acorn spun off the design team into a new company named Acorn RISC Machines Ltd., which became ARM Ltd when its parent company, ARM Holdings plc, floated on the London Stock Exchange and NASDAQ in 1998.[20] The new Apple-ARM work would eventually evolve into the ARM6, first released in early 1992.
Recommended publications
  • Multiprocessing in Mobile Platforms: the Marketing and the Reality
    Multiprocessing in Mobile Platforms: the Marketing and the Reality Marco Cornero, Andreas Anyuru ST-Ericsson Introduction During the last few years the mobile platforms industry has aggressively introduced multiprocessing in response to the ever increasing performance demanded by the market. Given the highly competitive nature of the mobile industry, multiprocessing has been adopted as a marketing tool. This highly visible, differentiating feature is used to pass the oversimplified message that more processors mean better platforms and performance. The reality is much more complex, because several interdependent factors are at play in determining the efficiency of multiprocessing platforms (such as the effective impact on software performance, chip frequency, area and power consumption) with the number of processors impacting only partially the overall balance, and with contrasting effects linked to the underlying silicon technologies. In this article we illustrate and compare the main technological options available in multiprocessing for mobile platforms, highlighting the synergies between multiprocessing and the disruptive FD-SOI silicon technology used in the upcoming ST-Ericsson products. We will show that compared to personal computers (PCs), the performance of single-processors in mobile platforms is still growing and how, from a software performance perspective, it is more profitable today to focus on faster dual-core rather than slower quad-core processors. We will also demonstrate how FD-SOI benefits dual-core processors even more by providing higher frequency for the same power consumption, together with a wider range of energy efficient operating modes. All of this results in a simpler, cheaper and more effective solution than competing homogeneous and heterogeneous quad-processors.
    [Show full text]
  • M Morpho of Sm Ologica Mall-Sp S Al, Phy Pore a Solana Siolog
    Vol. 8(37), pp. 3422-3434, 10 September, 2014 DOI: 10.5897/AJMR2014.6802 Article Number: B5A96EE47927 ISSN 1996-0808 African Journal of Microbiology Research Copyright © 2014 Author(s) retain the copyrighht of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/AJMR Full Length Research Paper Morphological, physiological and pathogenic variability of small-spore Alternaria sp. causinng leaf blight of Solanaceous plants in Allgeria BESSADAT Nabahat1*, SIMONEAU Philippe2, BENICHOU Soumaya1, SETTI Benali3, Kihal Mabrouk1 and HENNI Djamel Eddine1 1Laboratoire de Microbiologie Appliquée, Université d’Oran Es-Senia, BP15224 El M’naouer 31000 Oran, Algeria. 2SFR QUASAV 4207, UMR 1345 IRHS, Université d’Angers, 2 boulevard Lavoisier, France. 3Institut des Sciences Agronomiques, Université de Chlef, Algeria. Received 25 February, 2014; Acceppted 9 June, 2014 Due to premature defoliation, early blight epidemics can cause major yield losses. Large-spore Alternaria species such as A. solani and A. tomatophila have long been recognized as important pathogens responsible for such blight disease in the famiily Solanaceeae and thus represent a serious risk for crop production. Small-spore Alternaria species have also been frequently isolated from plant samples with typical blight symptoms but their incidence as primary pathogens is often controversial. In order to study the diversity of small-spore Alternaria species, 32 isolates were selected from a larger collection of 130 isolates from infected leaves, fruits and sttems of tomato from various growing regions of North-West Algeria. Morphological characterization under standard conditions annd polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses using specific primers to amplify a part of the ITS regions and the 5.8S gene were conducted to confirm their identification as members of the altternata section.
    [Show full text]
  • FAN53525 3.0A, 2.4Mhz, Digitally Programmable Tinybuck® Regulator
    FAN53525 — 3.0 A, 2.4 MHz, June 2014 FAN53525 3.0A, 2.4MHz, Digitally Programmable TinyBuck® Regulator Digitally Programmable TinyBuck Digitally Features Description . Fixed-Frequency Operation: 2.4 MHz The FAN53525 is a step-down switching voltage regulator that delivers a digitally programmable output from an input . Best-in-Class Load Transient voltage supply of 2.5 V to 5.5 V. The output voltage is 2 . Continuous Output Current Capability: 3.0 A programmed through an I C interface capable of operating up to 3.4 MHz. 2.5 V to 5.5 V Input Voltage Range Using a proprietary architecture with synchronous . Digitally Programmable Output Voltage: rectification, the FAN53525 is capable of delivering 3.0 A - 0.600 V to 1.39375 V in 6.25 mV Steps continuous at over 80% efficiency, maintaining that efficiency at load currents as low as 10 mA. The regulator operates at Programmable Slew Rate for Voltage Transitions . a nominal fixed frequency of 2.4 MHz, which reduces the . I2C-Compatible Interface Up to 3.4 Mbps value of the external components to 330 nH for the output inductor and as low as 20 µF for the output capacitor. PFM Mode for High Efficiency in Light Load . Additional output capacitance can be added to improve . Quiescent Current in PFM Mode: 50 µA (Typical) regulation during load transients without affecting stability, allowing inductance up to 1.2 µH to be used. Input Under-Voltage Lockout (UVLO) ® At moderate and light loads, Pulse Frequency Modulation Regulator Thermal Shutdown and Overload Protection . (PFM) is used to operate in Power-Save Mode with a typical .
    [Show full text]
  • GPU Developments 2018
    GPU Developments 2018 2018 GPU Developments 2018 © Copyright Jon Peddie Research 2019. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without written permission from Jon Peddie Research. This report is the property of Jon Peddie Research (JPR) and made available to a restricted number of clients only upon these terms and conditions. Agreement not to copy or disclose. This report and all future reports or other materials provided by JPR pursuant to this subscription (collectively, “Reports”) are protected by: (i) federal copyright, pursuant to the Copyright Act of 1976; and (ii) the nondisclosure provisions set forth immediately following. License, exclusive use, and agreement not to disclose. Reports are the trade secret property exclusively of JPR and are made available to a restricted number of clients, for their exclusive use and only upon the following terms and conditions. JPR grants site-wide license to read and utilize the information in the Reports, exclusively to the initial subscriber to the Reports, its subsidiaries, divisions, and employees (collectively, “Subscriber”). The Reports shall, at all times, be treated by Subscriber as proprietary and confidential documents, for internal use only. Subscriber agrees that it will not reproduce for or share any of the material in the Reports (“Material”) with any entity or individual other than Subscriber (“Shared Third Party”) (collectively, “Share” or “Sharing”), without the advance written permission of JPR. Subscriber shall be liable for any breach of this agreement and shall be subject to cancellation of its subscription to Reports. Without limiting this liability, Subscriber shall be liable for any damages suffered by JPR as a result of any Sharing of any Material, without advance written permission of JPR.
    [Show full text]
  • An Emerging Architecture in Smart Phones
    International Journal of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science Vol. 3, No. 2, 2018, pp. 29-38 http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ijeecs ARM Processor Architecture: An Emerging Architecture in Smart Phones Naseer Ahmad, Muhammad Waqas Boota * Department of Computer Science, Virtual University of Pakistan, Lahore, Pakistan Abstract ARM is a 32-bit RISC processor architecture. It is develop and licenses by British company ARM holdings. ARM holding does not manufacture and sell the CPU devices. ARM holding only licenses the processor architecture to interested parties. There are two main types of licences implementation licenses and architecture licenses. ARM processors have a unique combination of feature such as ARM core is very simple as compare to general purpose processors. ARM chip has several peripheral controller, a digital signal processor and ARM core. ARM processor consumes less power but provide the high performance. Now a day, ARM Cortex series is very popular in Smartphone devices. We will also see the important characteristics of cortex series. We discuss the ARM processor and system on a chip (SOC) which includes the Qualcomm, Snapdragon, nVidia Tegra, and Apple system on chips. In this paper, we discuss the features of ARM processor and Intel atom processor and see which processor is best. Finally, we will discuss the future of ARM processor in Smartphone devices. Keywords RISC, ISA, ARM Core, System on a Chip (SoC) Received: May 6, 2018 / Accepted: June 15, 2018 / Published online: July 26, 2018 @ 2018 The Authors. Published by American Institute of Science. This Open Access article is under the CC BY license.
    [Show full text]
  • ARM Architecture
    ARM Architecture Comppgzuter Organization and Assembly ygg Languages Yung-Yu Chuang with slides by Peng-Sheng Chen, Ville Pietikainen ARM history • 1983 developed by Acorn computers – To replace 6502 in BBC computers – 4-man VLSI design team – Its simp lic ity comes from the inexper ience team – Match the needs for generalized SoC for reasonable power, performance and die size – The first commercial RISC implemenation • 1990 ARM (Advanced RISC Mac hine ), owned by Acorn, Apple and VLSI ARM Ltd Design and license ARM core design but not fabricate Why ARM? • One of the most licensed and thus widespread processor cores in the world – Used in PDA, cell phones, multimedia players, handheld game console, digital TV and cameras – ARM7: GBA, iPod – ARM9: NDS, PSP, Sony Ericsson, BenQ – ARM11: Apple iPhone, Nokia N93, N800 – 90% of 32-bit embedded RISC processors till 2009 • Used especially in portable devices due to its low power consumption and reasonable performance ARM powered products ARM processors • A simple but powerful design • A whlhole filfamily of didesigns shiharing siilimilar didesign principles and a common instruction set Naming ARM •ARMxyzTDMIEJFS – x: series – y: MMU – z: cache – T: Thumb – D: debugger – M: Multiplier – I: EmbeddedICE (built-in debugger hardware) – E: Enhanced instruction – J: Jazell e (JVM) – F: Floating-point – S: SthiiblSynthesizible version (source code version for EDA tools) Popular ARM architectures •ARM7TDMI – 3 pipe line stages (ft(fetc h/deco de /execu te ) – High code density/low power consumption – One of the most used ARM-version (for low-end systems) – All ARM cores after ARM7TDMI include TDMI even if they do not include TDMI in their labels • ARM9TDMI – Compatible with ARM7 – 5 stages (fe tc h/deco de /execu te /memory /wr ite ) – Separate instruction and data cache •ARM11 ARM family comparison year 1995 1997 1999 2003 ARM is a RISC • RISC: simple but powerful instructions that execute within a single cycle at high clock speed.
    [Show full text]
  • Create Low-Power Applications with MQX™ and MQX™ Lite RTOS FTF-SDS-F0040
    Hands-On Workshop: Create Low-Power Applications with MQX™ and MQX™ Lite RTOS FTF-SDS-F0040 Maclain Lobdell | Freescale Software Product Manager Vincent Leynaert | Freescale FAE APR.2014 TM External Use Hands-On Workshop: Create Low-Power Applications with MQX™ and MQX™ Lite RTOS FTF-SDS-F0040 4 Hour Class Learn how to take advantage of the power management capabilities of MQX and MQX Lite RTOS. See how to create feature-rich applications without killing battery life. Attendees will get hands-on experience with system power mode transitions, driver state transitions and slowing or stopping the system tick timer for power savings. TM External Use 1 Session Introduction • Power efficiency is an increasingly important part of embedded product design. Power consumption budgets are tightening even though performance expectations are ever increasing. • You can create power efficient applications while using an RTOS for sophisticated designs. TM External Use 2 Session Objectives • After completing this session you will be able to: − Understand how power management capabilities can be used in RTOS- based applications − Understand how to perform system power mode transitions, frequency scaling, driver state transitions, and slow or stop the RTOS system tick timer for power savings TM External Use 3 Agenda • Quick Review of MQX Software Solutions • Tools for Analyzing MCU Power • Kinetis MCU Low Power Features • MQX RTOS Power Management Features − Hands On • Optimizing Applications for Low Power − Optimizing/Disabling the System Tick Timer − Architecting
    [Show full text]
  • Microware OS-9 Release Notes Version 3.2
    Microware OS-9 Release Notes Version 4.1 RadiSys. 118th Street Des Moines, Iowa 50325 515-223-8000 www.radisys.com Revision A • May 2003 Copyright and publication information Reproduction notice This manual reflects version 4.1 of Microware OS-9. The software described in this document is intended to Reproduction of this document, in part or whole, by be used on a single computer system. RadiSys Corpo- any means, electrical, mechanical, magnetic, optical, ration expressly prohibits any reproduction of the soft- chemical, manual, or otherwise is prohibited, without written permission from RadiSys Corporation. ware on tape, disk, or any other medium except for backup purposes. Distribution of this software, in part Disclaimer or whole, to any other party or on any other system may constitute copyright infringements and misappropria- The information contained herein is believed to be accurate as of the date of publication. However, tion of trade secrets and confidential processes which RadiSys Corporation will not be liable for any damages are the property of RadiSys Corporation and/or other including indirect or consequential, from use of the parties. Unauthorized distribution of software may OS-9 operating system, Microware-provided software, cause damages far in excess of the value of the copies or reliance on the accuracy of this documentation. involved. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. May 2003 Copyright ©2003 by RadiSys Corporation. All rights reserved. EPC and RadiSys are registered trademarks of RadiSys Corporation. ASM, Brahma, DAI, DAQ, MultiPro, SAIB, Spirit, and ValuePro are trademarks of RadiSys Corporation. DAVID, MAUI, OS-9, OS-9000, and SoftStax are registered trademarks of RadiSys Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • We Shape the Connected World Automotive Autonomy Generating Energy Effectively Wearable Technology ARM’S Technology Is Cars Are Becoming Mobile Computing Platforms
    ARM Holdings plc Annual Report 2015: Strategic Report We shape the connected world Automotive autonomy Generating energy effectively Wearable technology ARM’s technology is Cars are becoming mobile computing platforms. Wind turbines and solar panels can be made Smart watches, biometric-monitors and More sensors and cameras are being included more effective by including technology that augmented reality headsets are intelligent, to assist the driver with lane detection, reading controls and monitors the wind turbine, and connected devices that can give us extra shaping the way we roadside signage and identifying potential hazards aggregates data across the entire wind farm. information to improve our health and or people crossing the road. In time, driver wellness, or just to help us have more fun. all live our lives; in the assistance may lead to a fully automated vehicle. home, as we travel, at school or work, and as we have fun with our friends Mobile computing Smart city streets Intelligent networks Smarter homes ARM-based mobile computers, including City infrastructure from street lights to car Broadband and mobile phone network speeds Cost-efficiency in the home can be improved smartphones, tablets and some laptops are, parking meters can be made more effective by are increasing, and latency decreasing, enabling through learning thermostats that understand for many people, the primary device for their embedding intelligent chips. Street lights that new services for operators to provide to your daily routine, domestic appliances that use work, whether in an office or on the road; can dim when no one is nearby will save energy consumers and enterprises, from delivering advanced algorithms for calculating water and for researching and writing school assignments; and reduce carbon emissions, and prognostics in more movie and TV options to collating and detergent requirements, and smart meters that and for engaging with friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Realtime Capabilities of Low-End Powerpc and ARM Boards for Embedded Systems
    Realtime capabilities of low-end PowerPC and ARM boards for embedded systems Alexander Bauer PHYTEC Messtechnik Gmbh Robert-Koch-Str.39, 55129 Mainz, Germany [email protected] Abstract With the stepwise integration of the Realtime Preemption Patches (RT-Preempt) into the Mainline Linux kernel and their support for architectures other than Intel and AMD, there are now a number of choices which board to use for a particular embedded realtime project running Mainline Linux. In order to select the appropriate processor and clock frequency, it would be desirable to have some generally applicable ranges of worst-case latencies that can be obtained using the various processor types and conditions. We, therefore, determined the internal worst-case latency of PowerPC and ARM boards running Linux 2.6.20 and above patched with RT-Preempt. The PowerPC-board (Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B) was running at 266 and 400 MHz, the ARM board (Phytec phyCORE-PXA270) was running at 266 and 520 MHz. This article will provide the details of the various measurement set-ups, present the results and discuss them with respect to the design differences between PowerPC and ARM. 1 Introduction This paper presents the results of the latency tests and discusses the results with respect of the different In the embedded market there is a wide range of processor designs. processors to choose from. A processor is typically selected for a customer design because of it features, e.g. video interface and peripherals, and the clock 2 Latency Tests frequency. With the growing importance of Linux and especially realtime Linux for customer designs For the latency tests based on MPC5200 we used in the embedded market, it is also essential to choose the PHYTEC phyCORE MPC5200 board with 400 the right processor that will cope with the realtime MHz as a reference platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet & Connectivity
    Cover - 228.qxp 6/10/2009 8:42 AM Page 1 Battery-in-a-Chip Technology p. 62 • Up & Running With C Language p. 70 www.circuitcellar.com CIRCUITTHE MAGAZINE FOR COMPUTER CELLAR APPLICATIONS #228 July 2009 INTERNET & CONNECTIVITY Internet-Based Weather Data Acquisition A Compact Webcam Design From Start to Finish Ethernet-Controlled HERMS Text Library for Real-Time Translation I2C Master Bus Controller $5.95 U.S. ($6.95 Canada) C2.qxp 1/29/2009 10:42 AM Page 1 1.qxp 4/3/2009 10:20 AM Page 1 25.qxp 4/27/2009 8:36 PM Page 1 3.qxp 6/2/2009 1:42 PM Page 1 Let your geek shine. Meet Vanessa Carpenter and Diesel Møbius, SparkFun customers and developers of the Critical Corset. Using a Polar heart rate monitor, an Arduino, and a cleverly hidden air pump system, Vanessa and Diesel designed a corset that explores the rules of attraction. As the user’s heart rate increases, the corset gently tightens, creating a more confident posture. Whether you need a heart rate monitor or just a handful of LEDs, the tools are out there. Create a project you’ll love, and let your geek shine too. Sharing Ingenuity WWW.SPARKFUN.COM ©2009 SparkFun Electronics, Inc. All rights reserved. For more info on Vanessa and Diesel’s project visit www.illutron.dk. SFE-0015-PrintAd05-CircuitCellar.indd 1 5/19/09 4:49 PM Task_Masthead_228.qxp 6/12/2009 8:46 AM Page 4 ASK ® TMANAGER CIRCUIT CELLAR THE MAGAZINE FOR COMPUTER APPLICATIONS ’Net Tech and You FOUNDER/EDITORIAL DIRECTOR Steve Ciarcia CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER Jeannette Ciarcia MANAGING EDITOR With each passing year, we receive more and more arti- C.
    [Show full text]
  • Microkernel Construction Introduction
    Microkernel Construction Introduction Nils Asmussen 04/09/2020 1 / 32 Normal Organization Thursday, 4th DS, 2 SWS Slides: www.tudos.org ! Studies ! Lectures ! MKC Subscribe to our mailing list: www.tudos.org/mailman/listinfo/mkc2020 In winter term: Microkernel-based operating systems (MOS) Various labs 2 / 32 Organization due to COVID-19 Slides and video recordings of lectures will be published Questions can be asked on the mailing list Subscribe to the mailing list! Practical exercises are planed for the end of the semester Depending on how COVID-19 continues, exercises are in person or we use some video-conferencing tool 3 / 32 Goals 1 Provide deeper understanding of OS mechanisms 2 Look at the implementation details of microkernels 3 Make you become enthusiastic microkernel hackers 4 Propaganda for OS research done at TU Dresden and Barkhausen Institut 4 / 32 Outline Organization Monolithic vs. Microkernel Kernel design comparison Examples for microkernel-based systems Vision vs. Reality Challenges Overview About L4/NOVA 5 / 32 Monolithic Kernel System Design u s Application Application Application e r k Kernel e r File Network n e Systems Stacks l m Memory Process o Drivers Management Management d e Hardware 6 / 32 Monolithic Kernel OS (Propaganda) System components run in privileged mode No protection between system components Faulty driver can crash the whole system Malicious app could exploit bug in faulty driver More than 2=3 of today's OS code are drivers No need for good system design Direct access to data structures Undocumented
    [Show full text]