DOCSLIB.ORG

PROTECT Pregnancy Study- an Exploratory Study Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PROTECT Pregnancy Study- an Exploratory Study Of Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European ConsorTium PROTECT Pregnancy Study: An Exploratory Study of Self-Reported Medication Use in Pregnant Women Prepared on behalf of the PROTECT Consortium by Nancy Dreyer1, Stella Blackburn1, Shahrul Mt-Isa2, Maja Laursen3, AP Zetstra-Van der Woude4, Jonathan Richardson5, Valérie Hliva2, Lynne Comiskey6 On behalf of PROTECT Work Package 4 (New Tools for Data Collection from Consumers) participants. 1 Quintiles Real World and Late Phase Research 2 School of Public Health, Imperial College London, United Kingdom 3 Statens Serum Institut, Denmark 4 University of Groningen, the Netherlands 5 Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, United Kingdom 6 Genzyme a Sanofi Company Reviewed by PROTECT Work Package 4 participants Simon Thomas5, Lolkje de Jong-Van den Berg4, Omer de Mol6 Acknowledgements: We wish to acknowledge the collaboration of Alison Bourke, IMS Cegedim Strategic Data Medical Research, London, United Kingdom; Anna Latos-Bieleńska, Department of Medical Genetics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences; Bina Patel, Amgen; Christine Hallgreen, University of Copenhagen, Deborah Ashby, Imperial College London School of Public Health; Jens-Peter Balling, Lundbeck; Sally Stevens, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University; Rebecca Johnson, International Alliance of Patients’ Organizations, London, United Kingdom Version 18.3 (1st September 2015) Disclaimer: The processes described and conclusions drawn from the work presented herein relate solely to the testing of methodologies and representations for the evaluation of benefit and risk of medicines. This report neither replaces nor is intended to replace or comment on any regulatory decisions made by national regulatory agencies, nor the European Medicines Agency Acknowledgements: The research leading to these results was conducted as part of the PROTECT consortium (Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European ConsorTium, www.imi- protect.eu) which is a public-private partnership coordinated by the European Medicines Agency. The PROTECT project has received support from the Innovative Medicine Initiative Joint Undertaking (www.imi.europa.eu) under Grant Agreement n° 115004, resources of which are composed of financial contribution from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and EFPIA companies’ in kind contribution 1 Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European ConsorTium Abstract The PROTECT Pregnancy Study was designed to pilot direct-to-patient data collection methods for use in postmarketing surveillance into the foetal effects of maternal medication use in pregnancy. This study which recruited women between October 2012 and January 2014 explored whether women in participating EU countries were willing to provide information via the internet to enable prospective collection of medication exposure data and information about other life style factors during pregnancy. The study’s main objective was to assess the extent to which data collected directly from pregnant women via the Internet and an interactive voice response system (IVRS) would provide information on medication use and other potential risk factors throughout pregnancy that is suitable for research purposes. Pregnant women were recruited for the study using a variety of methods and were asked about use of medications, alcohol and tobacco, recreational drugs, herbals and other factors that could negatively affect birth outcome. The pilot study revealed that women would indeed volunteer to provide information on medication and lifestyle factors during pregnancy, with 2521 women enrolling from four countries over 8-18 months. The four countries include the United Kingdom (UK), The Netherlands (NL), Denmark (DK) and Poland (PL). Of those who enrolled in the PROTECT pregnancy study, only 2066 provided any data, with all but one providing data via internet. Of the 2065 who provided data via the Internet, 23% were recruited during their first trimester of pregnancy, 52% in their second and 25% in their 3rd trimester, showing that it was indeed feasible, though more difficult, to recruit women early in pregnancy. Eighty-three percent of women used 1 or more medicines (range 0-16) during their pregnancy or in the preceding month, with 19% reporting using 5 or more different medications. Women reported using slightly more medications during the first trimester (36% reported using at least one medication), compared with the second (34%) and third (32%) trimesters. Comparing data reported from the women in PROTECT with their linked data (primarily in the Danish registers) revealed that 83% of self-reported medicines prescribed for chronic conditions that were also recorded in the national prescription medication register. Women also reported taking several drugs which were not in the register during or within the preceding pregnancy. Much of this “non-register” drug use may be explained by non-prescription drug use or use at hospital or medications purchased more than six months prior to pregnancy. Further, 24% of women reported taking non-prescription medications during pregnancy, not counting herbals and dietary supplements; seven percent reported using herbal products during pregnancy. These findings suggest that register or survey data alone will not give a complete and accurate reflection of total drug use during pregnancy since there is both a significant non-prescription medication use and a discrepancy between recorded and reported medicine use. Also, self-reported data contained quite a lot of valuable information on medicines used for short-term conditions and medications used intermittently. Overall about one percent of women reported that they had taken medications that were prescribed for others and given to them, and seven percent reported having decided not to take medications that had been prescribed for them. In addition, seven percent of women reported having received anaesthetics during pregnancy, and five percent reported exposure to x-rays. Pregnancy outcomes were provided by 464 out of 1555 women whose expected dates of delivery occurred while the study was still actively collecting data. Overall 91% of women who reported a pregnancy outcome had a live birth. Eight of these births were twins which corresponds to population based figures. The frequency of foetal loss before 22 weeks of pregnancy was highest in Denmark 15% compared with 0-8% in the other three countries. Since a 2 Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European ConsorTium higher percentage of women in Denmark than in other countries were recruited during the first trimester when foetal loss is highest, this result is not surprising. Ten mothers (2.3%) reported that their babies had a birth defect that was “visible” to them at birth. Since the question posed to mothers was about visible defects rather than any defect because we thought that none-visible birth defects might not be immediately detected, it is our interpretation that what we observed is close to the expected range as reported by clinicians. We also conducted a comparison of self-reported data with data from electronic health records in the UK but were only able to match a small number of records, which precluded much generalization. This pilot study has provided valuable insights into whether data collected directly from consumers are suitable for research purposes. We found that it was possible to recruit pregnant women without the direct intervention of health care professionals, but that paid advertisements were necessary to recruit a reasonable sample size in a relatively short period of time. We were also able to recruit women earlier in pregnancy than is generally possible using the more traditional methods of data collection. Respondents provided details of prescription medication use. They also reported non-prescription medicine use as well as herbal and homeopathic drug use – all of which have proved difficult to collect by other means. Women were also willing to provide details of life-style choices such as alcohol, smoking and recreational drug use which are frequently not accurate or non-existent in medical records. This means that information on other risk factors and potential confounders can be collected to increase the value of this type of non-interventional research for understanding the teratogenic effects of medications and other exposures during pregnancy. In summary, direct to consumer studies offer important benefits in obtaining data not found in prescription drug registers and electronic health records, and these type of studies will be most informative when combined with selected data from other sources to validate clinical outcomes of interest, and to corroborate most important exposures. 3 Pharmacoepidemiological Research on Outcomes of Therapeutics by a European ConsorTium Table of Contents List of tables ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 List of figures ................................................................................................................................................................... 11 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Introduction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Everything You Need to Know About the Contraceptive Implant FDA Approval Means US Women Now Have a Progestin-Only Implant Among Their Birth Control Options
    OBGM_0906_Darney.final 8/18/06 11:36 AM Page 50 OBGMANAGEMENT Everything you need to know about the contraceptive implant FDA approval means US women now have a progestin-only implant among their birth control options n July 17, the US Food and Drug or even monthly action on the part of the Administration (FDA) approved user, it is well-suited for: Philip D. Darney, MD, MSc what may be the most effective • Women who wish to or need Professor and Chief, Department O of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and hormonal contraceptive ever developed, a to avoid estrogen Reproductive Sciences, University single-rod implant that goes by the trade • Teens who find adherence to a of California-San Francisco, name Implanon. The implant contains 68 contraceptive regimen difficult San Francisco General Hospital ® Dowden Health Media mg of etonogestrel (ENG), the active • Healthy adult women who desire metabolite of desogestrel, in a membrane long-term protection ofCopyright ethylene vinylFor acetate. personal In clinical usetrials only• Women who are breastfeeding involving 20,648 cycles of exposure, only 6 pregnancies occurred, for a cumulative 1 Pearl Index of 0.38 per 100 woman-years. ❚ IN THIS ARTICLE This article reviews: Pros and cons • the 2 contraceptive mechanisms Advantages include: ❙ How the • indications and patient selection • Cost. A study2 of 15 contraceptive progestin-only • pharmacology, safety, adverse effects methods found the implant cost-effec- implant prevents • patient satisfaction and discontinua- tive compared to short-acting methods, tion rates provided it was used long-term. As of fertilization • insertion and removal press time, the manufacturer had not Page 52 • key points of patient counseling released the price.
    [Show full text]
  • Criteria and Application for Women
    Criteria and Application for Women Retu Rn completed fo Rm via fax o R email to LIVESTRONG Foundation attn LIVESTRONG Fertility fax 512.309.5515 email [email protected] Made possible by participating reproductive endocrinologists and EMD Serono, Inc. © LIVESTRONG, a registered trademark of the LIVESTRONG Foundation. The LIVESTRONG Foundation is a 501(c)(3) under federal tax guidelines. The Foundation and its partners reserve the right to review patient profiles and to grant requests based on patient need. Goal The goal of LIVESTRONG Fertility is to increase access to fertility preservation services and treatments for qualified women who are diagnosed with cancer during their reproductive years. We are proud to offer assistance to qualified female applicants by providing access to fertility medications donated by EMD Serono, Inc. and discounted services from reproductive endocrinologists across the country. oveRview LIVESTRONG Fertility does not grant direct financial contributions to individuals. Instead, the LIVESTRONG Foundation has partnered with key organizations to increase access to procedures and treatments intended to preserve the possibility of fertility for qualified cancer patients whose medical treatments present the risk of infertility and who meet the criteria set forth below. For a list of participating facilities, please call 855.220.7777. what is included LIVESTRONG Fertility helps reduce the cost of embryo freezing and egg freezing procedures. A limited quantity of certain medications prescribed by a reproductive endocrinologist to assist in the development of multiple follicles through ovarian stimulation will be provided through a donation from EMD Serono, Inc. to qualified applicants (see eligibility criteria). Additionally, partnering local reproductive endocrinologists will offer embryo and egg freezing services at a significantly discounted rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Par Drugs and Chemicals Limited
    +91-8048372739 PAR DRUGS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED https://www.indiamart.com/pardrugs/ We are one of the leading Manufacturer of various Inorganic Molecules such as-Magnesium Hydroxide, Aluminium Hydroxide, Magnesium & Aluminum Silicates as well the blends of these molecules such as Magaldrate, Almagate, Hydrotalcite etc. About Us Par Drugs & Chemicals Private Limited incorporated in the year 1982 and proved its competency as the known Manufacturer of various Inorganice Molecules such as- Magnesium Hydroxide, Aluminium Hydroxide, Magnesium Trisilicate, Magnesium & Aluminum Silicates as well the blends of these molecules such as Magaldrate, Almagate, Hydrotalcite etcs. Our products stand high in terms of quality and low whereas price is concerned. Mr. F. V. Savani (Marketing Director) has enabled us to gain prominent position in industry. He ensures that the customer’s needs are efficiently fulfilled in an appropriate manner and they are served as per their demands. We do not compromises in terms of quality of our range and ensure that the customers are served accordingly. Our team ensures that products are manufactured in confirmation with the specific quality standards. Packaging of our range is done carefully so that products may reach the clients end in safe manner. Regular training sessions keep our employees aware of the changes taking place in industry and ensure that they also perform accordingly. Our well-equipped infrastructure has enabled us to carry our business operations in smooth and efficient manner. We have efficiently segregated
    [Show full text]
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome Similarities and Differences 2 www.ccfa.org IBD Help Center: 888.MY.GUT.PAIN 888.694.8872 Important Differences Between IBD and IBS Many diseases and conditions can affect the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which is part of the digestive system and includes the esophagus, stomach, small intestine and large intestine. These diseases and conditions include inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). IBD Help Center: 888.MY.GUT.PAIN 888.694.8872 www.ccfa.org 3 Inflammatory bowel diseases are a group of inflammatory conditions in which the body’s own immune system attacks parts of the digestive system. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Inflammatory bowel diseases are a group of inflamma- Causes tory conditions in which the body’s own immune system attacks parts of the digestive system. The two most com- The exact cause of IBD remains unknown. Researchers mon inflammatory bowel diseases are Crohn’s disease believe that a combination of four factors lead to IBD: a (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). IBD affects as many as 1.4 genetic component, an environmental trigger, an imbal- million Americans, most of whom are diagnosed before ance of intestinal bacteria and an inappropriate reaction age 35. There is no cure for IBD but there are treatments to from the immune system. Immune cells normally protect reduce and control the symptoms of the disease. the body from infection, but in people with IBD, the immune system mistakes harmless substances in the CD and UC cause chronic inflammation of the GI tract. CD intestine for foreign substances and launches an attack, can affect any part of the GI tract, but frequently affects the resulting in inflammation.
    [Show full text]
  • This Fact Sheet Provides Information to Patients with Eczema and Their Carers. About Topical Corticosteroids How to Apply Topic
    This fact sheet provides information to patients with eczema and their carers. About topical corticosteroids You or your child’s doctor has prescribed a topical corticosteroid for the treatment of eczema. For treating eczema, corticosteroids are usually prepared in a cream or ointment and are applied topically (directly onto the skin). Topical corticosteroids work by reducing inflammation and helping to control an over-reactive response of the immune system at the site of eczema. They also tighten blood vessels, making less blood flow to the surface of the skin. Together, these effects help to manage the symptoms of eczema. There is a range of steroids that can be used to treat eczema, each with different strengths (potencies). On the next page, the potencies of some common steroids are shown, as well as the concentration that they are usually used in cream or ointment preparations. Using a moisturiser along with a steroid cream does not reduce the effect of the steroid. There are many misconceptions about the side effects of topical corticosteroids. However these treatments are very safe and patients are encouraged to follow the treatment regimen as advised by their doctor. How to apply topical corticosteroids How often should I apply? How much should I apply? Apply 1–2 times each day to the affected area Enough cream should be used so that the of skin according to your doctor’s instructions. entire affected area is covered. The cream can then be rubbed or massaged into the Once the steroid cream has been applied, inflamed skin. moisturisers can be used straight away if needed.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Drugs List
    ^ ^ ^ ^ ^[ ^ The National Drugs List Of Syrian Arab Republic Sexth Edition 2006 ! " # "$ % &'() " # * +$, -. / & 0 /+12 3 4" 5 "$ . "$ 67"5,) 0 " /! !2 4? @ % 88 9 3: " # "$ ;+<=2 – G# H H2 I) – 6( – 65 : A B C "5 : , D )* . J!* HK"3 H"$ T ) 4 B K<) +$ LMA N O 3 4P<B &Q / RS ) H< C4VH /430 / 1988 V W* < C A GQ ") 4V / 1000 / C4VH /820 / 2001 V XX K<# C ,V /500 / 1992 V "!X V /946 / 2004 V Z < C V /914 / 2003 V ) < ] +$, [2 / ,) @# @ S%Q2 J"= [ &<\ @ +$ LMA 1 O \ . S X '( ^ & M_ `AB @ &' 3 4" + @ V= 4 )\ " : N " # "$ 6 ) G" 3Q + a C G /<"B d3: C K7 e , fM 4 Q b"$ " < $\ c"7: 5) G . HHH3Q J # Hg ' V"h 6< G* H5 !" # $%" & $' ,* ( )* + 2 ا اوا ادو +% 5 j 2 i1 6 B J' 6<X " 6"[ i2 "$ "< * i3 10 6 i4 11 6! ^ i5 13 6<X "!# * i6 15 7 G!, 6 - k 24"$d dl ?K V *4V h 63[46 ' i8 19 Adl 20 "( 2 i9 20 G Q) 6 i10 20 a 6 m[, 6 i11 21 ?K V $n i12 21 "% * i13 23 b+ 6 i14 23 oe C * i15 24 !, 2 6\ i16 25 C V pq * i17 26 ( S 6) 1, ++ &"r i19 3 +% 27 G 6 ""% i19 28 ^ Ks 2 i20 31 % Ks 2 i21 32 s * i22 35 " " * i23 37 "$ * i24 38 6" i25 39 V t h Gu* v!* 2 i26 39 ( 2 i27 40 B w< Ks 2 i28 40 d C &"r i29 42 "' 6 i30 42 " * i31 42 ":< * i32 5 ./ 0" -33 4 : ANAESTHETICS $ 1 2 -1 :GENERAL ANAESTHETICS AND OXYGEN 4 $1 2 2- ATRACURIUM BESYLATE DROPERIDOL ETHER FENTANYL HALOTHANE ISOFLURANE KETAMINE HCL NITROUS OXIDE OXYGEN PROPOFOL REMIFENTANIL SEVOFLURANE SUFENTANIL THIOPENTAL :LOCAL ANAESTHETICS !67$1 2 -5 AMYLEINE HCL=AMYLOCAINE ARTICAINE BENZOCAINE BUPIVACAINE CINCHOCAINE LIDOCAINE MEPIVACAINE OXETHAZAINE PRAMOXINE PRILOCAINE PREOPERATIVE MEDICATION & SEDATION FOR 9*: ;< " 2 -8 : : SHORT -TERM PROCEDURES ATROPINE DIAZEPAM INJ.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: 4,704,278 Wu Et Al
    United States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: 4,704,278 Wu et al. [45] Date of Patent: :1: Nov. 3, 1987 [54] FLUIDIZED MAGALDRATE SUSPENSION 4,117,116 9/1978 Buehler et a1. .................... .. 424/158 [75] Inventors: Chien-Chin Wu, Wilmington, Del.; OTHER PUBLICATIONS Gerald L‘ Renter’ Plattsburgh’ NY‘ Handbook on Nonprescription Drugs, Fifth Edition [73] Assignee: American Home Products Corp (Del), (1977), p. 16, American Pharmaceutical Assoc, Wash. New York, N.Y. D.C. [ * 1 Notice The portion of the term of this patent Primary Examiner-Frederick E. Waddell subsequent to Jun. 30, 2004 has been disclaimed. [57] ABSTRACT , [211 App], N03 395,012 An aqueous antacid composition of magaldrate gel and _ . a process for preparing same are described by the inven [22] F11e d'' A ug' 8 ’ 1986 t1on.- The composltlon- - is prepared from and contains _ . precipitated and undried magaldrate gel and a ?uidizing Related U‘S' Apphcatlon Data of a ?rst and second ?uidizer. On fluidizer is provided [63] Continuation of Ser. No. 661,648, Oct. 17, 1984, aban~ by an aluminum hydroxide gel having colloidal proper doned’ ties and the second by a pharmaceutically acceptable [51] Int. (:1.4 ............................................ .. A61K 33/08 citrate ion source including citric acid- The Process and [52] US. Cl. .............. .. 424/157; 424/158 compositiw are characterized in Providing a ?uid, [5 8] Field of Search .............................. .. 424/157, 158 resuspendlble, pharmaceutically elegant suspension POS _ ' sessing high antacid capacity and stability at even ele [56] References cued vated magaldrate concentrations in addition to the abil U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS ity to ?uidize stiff, paste-like magaldrate gel cakes.
    [Show full text]
  • (CD-P-PH/PHO) Report Classification/Justifica
    COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF MEDICINES AS REGARDS THEIR SUPPLY (CD-P-PH/PHO) Report classification/justification of medicines belonging to the ATC group D07A (Corticosteroids, Plain) Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION 4 DISCLAIMER 6 GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT 7 ACTIVE SUBSTANCES Methylprednisolone (ATC: D07AA01) 8 Hydrocortisone (ATC: D07AA02) 9 Prednisolone (ATC: D07AA03) 11 Clobetasone (ATC: D07AB01) 13 Hydrocortisone butyrate (ATC: D07AB02) 16 Flumetasone (ATC: D07AB03) 18 Fluocortin (ATC: D07AB04) 21 Fluperolone (ATC: D07AB05) 22 Fluorometholone (ATC: D07AB06) 23 Fluprednidene (ATC: D07AB07) 24 Desonide (ATC: D07AB08) 25 Triamcinolone (ATC: D07AB09) 27 Alclometasone (ATC: D07AB10) 29 Hydrocortisone buteprate (ATC: D07AB11) 31 Dexamethasone (ATC: D07AB19) 32 Clocortolone (ATC: D07AB21) 34 Combinations of Corticosteroids (ATC: D07AB30) 35 Betamethasone (ATC: D07AC01) 36 Fluclorolone (ATC: D07AC02) 39 Desoximetasone (ATC: D07AC03) 40 Fluocinolone Acetonide (ATC: D07AC04) 43 Fluocortolone (ATC: D07AC05) 46 2 Diflucortolone (ATC: D07AC06) 47 Fludroxycortide (ATC: D07AC07) 50 Fluocinonide (ATC: D07AC08) 51 Budesonide (ATC: D07AC09) 54 Diflorasone (ATC: D07AC10) 55 Amcinonide (ATC: D07AC11) 56 Halometasone (ATC: D07AC12) 57 Mometasone (ATC: D07AC13) 58 Methylprednisolone Aceponate (ATC: D07AC14) 62 Beclometasone (ATC: D07AC15) 65 Hydrocortisone Aceponate (ATC: D07AC16) 68 Fluticasone (ATC: D07AC17) 69 Prednicarbate (ATC: D07AC18) 73 Difluprednate (ATC: D07AC19) 76 Ulobetasol (ATC: D07AC21) 77 Clobetasol (ATC: D07AD01) 78 Halcinonide (ATC: D07AD02) 81 LIST OF AUTHORS 82 3 INTRODUCTION The availability of medicines with or without a medical prescription has implications on patient safety, accessibility of medicines to patients and responsible management of healthcare expenditure. The decision on prescription status and related supply conditions is a core competency of national health authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Teen–Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (Teen-LABS) Study
    Supplementary Online Content Inge TH, Zeller MH, Jenkins TM, et al; Teen-LABS Consortium. Perioperative outcomes of adolescents undergoing bariatric surgery: the Teen–Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (Teen-LABS) Study. JAMA Pediatr. Published online November 4, 2013. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4296. eAppendix. Research Plan and eCRF Data Collection Forms eTable 1. Central Laboratory Measures by Reference Category eTable 2. Laboratory Measures Summarized eTable 3. Reasons for Readmission Within 30 Days of Operation This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. © 2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/27/2021 eAppendix Research Plan A. Design Summary: The study used a prospective, observational cohort design in which the majority of the data are collected at the same time that routine clinical care of bariatric patients is occurring. Teen-LABS is an approved ancillary study of the LABS consortium, with the research methodology and instruments of the LABS-2 study for collection of longer term outcomes adapted for use in adolescents, including clinical assessments, detailed interviews, questionnaires, and laboratory tests at baseline, 30 days postoperatively, and at six months and annually following surgery. Adolescents were recruited prospectively from five clinical sites. Detailed data about the surgical procedure and peri- and postoperative care was collected by the investigators. Adjudication of pre-specified clinical events was performed by an independent committee in order to determine the relatedness of the events to the bariatric procedure. Biospecimens (serum, plasma, DNA, urine) were obtained to address hypotheses relevant to this study and to provide a resource for future biological studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Medicinal Drugs and Driving: Co-Ordination and Synthesis Report
    Project No. TREN-05-FP6TR-S07.61320-518404-DRUID DRUID Driving under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines Integrated Project 1.6. Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystem 1.6.2: Sustainable Surface Transport 6th Framework Programme Deliverable 4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Due date of deliverable: 21.07.2011 Actual submission date: 21.07.2011 Revision date: 21.07.2011 Start date of project: 15.10.2006 Duration: 48 months Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: UVA Revision 0.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission x Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) DRUID 6th Framework Programme Deliverable D.4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Page 1 of 243 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Authors Trinidad Gómez-Talegón, Inmaculada Fierro, M. Carmen Del Río, F. Javier Álvarez (UVa, University of Valladolid, Spain) Partners - Silvia Ravera, Susana Monteiro, Han de Gier (RUGPha, University of Groningen, the Netherlands) - Gertrude Van der Linden, Sara-Ann Legrand, Kristof Pil, Alain Verstraete (UGent, Ghent University, Belgium) - Michel Mallaret, Charles Mercier-Guyon, Isabelle Mercier-Guyon (UGren, University of Grenoble, Centre Regional de Pharmacovigilance, France) - Katerina Touliou (CERT-HIT, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Greece) - Michael Hei βing (BASt, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Germany).
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Analysis Plan: IT001-302
    Statistical Analysis Plan: IT001-302 Study Title: A prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind, double dummy study of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of intravenous sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem-etzadroxil with probenecid versus intravenous ertapenem followed by oral ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin-clavulanate for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in adults. Study Number: IT001-302 Study Phase: Phase 3 Product Name: Sulopenem (CP-70,429), Sulopenem-etzadroxil (PF-03709270)/Probenecid Indication: Complicated urinary tract infection Study Statistician: Michael Zelasky Study Clinician: Steven I. Aronin, M.D. Sponsor: Iterum Therapeutics International Limited 20 Research Parkway, Suite A Old Saybrook, CT 06475 Final SAP Date: September 25, 2019 Revised SAP Date: February 11, 2020 Protocol Version: January 16, 2020 Confidentiality Statement This document is strictly confidential. It was developed by Iterum Therapeutics US Limited should not be disclosed to a third party, with the exception of regulatory agencies and study audit personnel. Reproduction, modification or adaptation, in part or in total, is strictly forbidden without prior written approval by Iterum Therapeutics US Limited Digitally signed by Anita F Das DN: cn=Anita F Das, o, ou, [email protected]. Anita F Das com, c=US Date: 2020.02.12 12:57:12 -08'00' Sulopenem IV; Sulopenem etzadroxil Iterum Therapeutics Statistical Analysis Plan: IT001-302 11 February 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of Premature Termination Codon Suppressing Compounds for Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Using Machine Learning
    Prediction of Premature Termination Codon Suppressing Compounds for Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy using Machine Learning Kate Wang et al. Supplemental Table S1. Drugs selected by Pharmacophore-based, ML-based and DL- based search in the FDA-approved drugs database Pharmacophore WEKA TF 1-Palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3- 5-O-phosphono-alpha-D- (phospho-rac-(1-glycerol)) ribofuranosyl diphosphate Acarbose Amikacin Acetylcarnitine Acetarsol Arbutamine Acetylcholine Adenosine Aldehydo-N-Acetyl-D- Benserazide Acyclovir Glucosamine Bisoprolol Adefovir dipivoxil Alendronic acid Brivudine Alfentanil Alginic acid Cefamandole Alitretinoin alpha-Arbutin Cefdinir Azithromycin Amikacin Cefixime Balsalazide Amiloride Cefonicid Bethanechol Arbutin Ceforanide Bicalutamide Ascorbic acid calcium salt Cefotetan Calcium glubionate Auranofin Ceftibuten Cangrelor Azacitidine Ceftolozane Capecitabine Benserazide Cerivastatin Carbamoylcholine Besifloxacin Chlortetracycline Carisoprodol beta-L-fructofuranose Cilastatin Chlorobutanol Bictegravir Citicoline Cidofovir Bismuth subgallate Cladribine Clodronic acid Bleomycin Clarithromycin Colistimethate Bortezomib Clindamycin Cyclandelate Bromotheophylline Clofarabine Dexpanthenol Calcium threonate Cromoglicic acid Edoxudine Capecitabine Demeclocycline Elbasvir Capreomycin Diaminopropanol tetraacetic acid Erdosteine Carbidopa Diazolidinylurea Ethchlorvynol Carbocisteine Dibekacin Ethinamate Carboplatin Dinoprostone Famotidine Cefotetan Dipyridamole Fidaxomicin Chlormerodrin Doripenem Flavin adenine dinucleotide
    [Show full text]