Assessing the Impediments Before the Two-State Solution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessing the Impediments Before the Two-State Solution Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org ASSESSING THE IMPEDIMENTS BEFORE THE TWO-STATE SOLUTION Israeli settlement Activities in the occupied State of Palestine during the 1st Quarter of 2020, (January – March) / 2020 http://www.arij.org Quarterly Report http://www.lrcj.org/ (January – March) / 2020 This REPORT is prepared as part of the project entitled ASSESSING THE IMPEDIMENTS BEFORE THE TWO-STATE SOLUTION, which is financially supported by the EU. However, the content of this paper is the sole responsibility of ARIJ & LRC and does not necessarily reflect those of the donors. Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org Violations of the Israeli occupation Army Violations of the Israeli occupation Army during the month of January 2020 Israeli police, assaulted several Palestinian worshipers and detained two of them while they were present at the Bab al-Rahma prayer area inside the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, in occupied Jerusalem. Police officers broke into Bab al-Rahma and physically assaulted the worshipers and attacked them with teargas, for no apparent reason. At least two of the worshipers were detained by the police during the attack. The prayer area was reopened in February of 2019, after it had been closed by Israeli police for 16 years, under the claim of a court order, which turned out to be false. (IMEMC 2 January 2020) The Israeli occupation Army (IOA) opened fire at a Palestinian young man on a road near the settlement bloc of Gush Etzion, south of Bethlehem. The citizen suffered a bullet injury in one of his feet after soldiers opened fire at him near the Etzion junction in southern Bethlehem. (PALINFO 2 January 2020) The Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) seized five tractors belonging to Palestinian farmers in Um al-Qaba area, in the Jordan Valley, northern occupied West Bank. The IOA seized the five agricultural tractors under the pretext of working in a “closed military zone.” The area is located in Area C of the West Bank, which is under full Israeli military control and where the Palestinian government has no jurisdiction. Israel seeks to displace the Palestinian population out of the Jordan Valley by any means, to allow greater numbers of illegal settlers to move in. (IMEMC 3 January 2020) The Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) assaulted, several Palestinian Muslim worshipers in Bab ar-Rahma Mosque, in the Al-Aqsa Mosque Compound, in occupied East Jerusalem, and detained two. The IOA and police officers, invaded the holy site while trying to force the worshipers out, leading to protests. The IOA sprayed many worshipers with pepper-spray, and assaulted others with clubs and batons. The IOA also detained two young Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org men, identified as Mohammad Shawish and Abdulla al-Bizra, before moving them to an interrogation facility. (IMEMC 3 January 2020) The Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) injured several Palestinians in Beit Ummar town, north of Hebron, in the southern part of the occupied West Bank. Several army jeeps invaded the ath-Thaher area, south of Beit Ummar, and attacked protesters with live rounds, gas bombs and concussion grenades. The IOA randomly fired gas bombs and concussion grenades, many of them striking homes in the area. Many Palestinians who suffered the effects of teargas inhalation, and some of the wounded fainted due to the severe effects. (IMEMC 3 January 2020) The Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) invaded Shu’fat refugee camp, in occupied Jerusalem, before storming and ransacking several homes. (IMEMC 3 January 2020) The Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) terrorized, Palestinian residents in the village of Ein Hilweh in the Jordan Valley region of the occupied West Bank after searching and ransacking residential tents. Five Israeli security guards in street clothes, stormed tents in the village, searched and ransacked them and terrorized their residents. The IOA invaded the village while the guards were conducting the search and remained there for two hours. (IMEMC 3 January 2020) The Israeli occupation Army (IOA) detained a young man from the city of Qalqilia, northern occupied West Bank. The IOA detained Ahmed Tawfiq Radayda, 37, from al-Ubeidiya, at the Za’tara military checkpoint, south of Nablus. The IOA searched Radayda, seized a sum of 4,000 shekels ($1,151 USD) in his possession, and handed him a report for intelligence review, before releasing him. (IMEMC 5 January 2020) The Israeli occupation authority (IOA) prevented Sheikh Ismail Hawahdeh, preacher of the Aqsa Mosque, from entering Jerusalem for the third consecutive week. Sheikh Nawahdeh is the only Aqsa Mosque preacher from the West Bank. (PALINFO 5 January 2020) The Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) invaded Beit Ummar town, north of the southern West Bank city of Hebron, and injured many Palestinians protesting the invasion. Several army jeeps invaded the ath-Thaher area, close to Karmie Tzur settlement, which was built on private Palestinian lands, south of the town. The IOA attacked Palestinian protesters with live Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org fire, rubber-coated steel bullets, gas bombs, and concussion grenades, in addition to firing gas bombs directly at homes. Many Palestinians suffer the effects of teargas inhalation, while several others suffered cuts and bruises. (IMEMC 7 January 2020) The Israeli occupation Army (IOA) raided the home of Jerusalem’s governor, Adnan Ghaith, in the occupied Jerusalem town of Silwan, and served his family a summon for Ghaith to appear before Israeli intelligence. Ghaith has been detained at least 13 times since he assumed the office of Jerusalem governor and was previously banned from entering the West Bank for a period of six months that was ultimately renewed. He was also banned from contacting a number of specific people. (IMEMC 8 January 2020) The Israeli occupation Army (IOA) and Police assaulted Palestinian Muslim devotees at the Bab Arrahma praying court and at the Bab Hetta court of Al-Aqsa mosque, in occupied Jerusalem. The IOA assaulted the congregation at Bab Arrahma court and abducted two Jerusalemite men and a woman, in the time of the evening prayer. The IOA also assaulted the congregation at Bab Hetta court and denied them access to the mosque.These attacks coincide with occupation police plans to issue a decision to seal Bab Arrahma gate completely, in order to Judaize the area. (IMEMC 8 January 2020) The Israeli occupation Army (IOA) invaded Aqabat Jaber refugee camp, southwest of Jericho city in the occupied West Bank, and injured many Palestinians during ensuing protests. The IOA shot six Palestinians with rubber-coated steel bullets, including one who was shot with three bullets in his left leg, and another Palestinian was shot in the forehead. Many Palestinians suffered the effects of teargas inhalation, especially at the entrance of the refugee camp, and in its center; most of them were in their owned homes. Furthermore, a Palestinian car crashed into an electricity pole after its driver lost control on his vehicles, due to the severe effects of teargas inhalation and concussion grenades fired by the soldiers. The IOA also invaded and violently searched many homes in the refugee camp, and interrogated the families. (IMEMC 8 January 2020) The Israeli occupation Army (IOA) attacked, many Palestinian worshipers in the Al-Aqsa Mosque Compound, in occupied East Jerusalem, and detained six Palestinians, including one woman. The IOA assaulted dozens of worshipers near Bab ar-Rahma, one of the gates of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org before detaining the six Palestinians. The IOA attacked many Palestinians near Bab ar-Rahma while they were trying to enter Al-Aqsa for evening prayers. (IMEMC 8 January 2020) The Israeli occupation Army (IOA) detained a wounded Palestinian teenage boy from the al-‘Arroub refugee camp, north of the southern West Bank city of Hebron. The IOA stormed the homes of Hassouna Badawi, after smashing the main door, and conducted violent searches of the property, causing serious damage, before detaining his son Ahmad, 17. The IOA also attacked the family with clubs and batons, causing various cuts and bruises, and illegally confiscated 6000 Shekels (Around $1730). (IMEMC 8 January 2020) During the weekly nonviolent protest in Kufur Qaddoum village in the northern West Bank, dozens of local residents suffered from tear gas inhalation when Israeli occupation Army (IOA) attacked demonstrators. The weekly anti-settlement march called for the opening of the main village street, which was closed by the IOA 16 years ago. The IOA fired tear gas canisters and metal bullets towards the participants in the march, which led to dozens of cases of gas inhalation, which were treated on the scene. (IMEMC 11 January 2020) The Israeli occupation police decided to ban four Palestinian youths from entering al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem for 5-6 months. four Palestinians received the new order after they had served a week-long ban. Mohammed Zaghir, Ahmad Rokon and Ahmad al-Shawish were ordered to stay away from al-Aqsa Mosque for five months and Emad Abu Sneineh for six months. Three of the Palestinian citizens affected by the entry ban are ex- prisoners who had served different periods in Israeli jails.
Recommended publications
  • Palestinian Gefugees
    SPECIAL BULLETIN May 2001 INTRODUCTION & HISTORICAL BACKGROUND The Palestinian refugee problem was created as a result of In the course of the June War of 1967 (An-Naqsa), the remaining two wars - the War of 1948 and the June 1967 War. The War of parts of Arab Palestine (along with the Syrian Golan Heights and 1948 (An-Naqba) was triggered by the UN General Assembly Egypt's Sinai Peninsula), came under Israeli occupation, and some (UNGA) Res. 181 of 29 Nov. 1947 ('Partition Plan') that allocated 300,000 Palestinians were displaced from the West Bank and Gaza 56.47% of Palestine to the Jewish state, at a time when Jews Strip, including around 175,000 UNRWA-registered refugees who were less than one-third of the population and owned no more were to flee for a second time. To accommodate the new wave of than 7% of the land. The war resulted in the creation of the displaced persons ten extra refugee camps were established. state of Israel in 78% of Palestine, and the uprooting of the Throughout the occupation, Israeli policies have followed a systematic indigenous Palestinian population from their homeland by pattern of land confiscation and other discriminatory measures aimed military force, expulsion or fear of massacres and other attacks at forcing even more Palestinians to leave their homeland. The seizure perpetrated by Jewish underground and militant groups such of land and property and their transferal to new Jewish immigrants as Haganah, Irgun, and Stern Gang. and Israeli settlers is backed by a series of laws enacted to prevent After the war, the newly established UN Conciliation the return and resettlement of the rightful owners (e.g., Absentee Commission for Palestine (UNCCP) estimated that 726,000 Property Law).
    [Show full text]
  • Secretariats of Roads Transportation Report 2015
    Road Transportation Report: 2015. Category Transfer Fees Amount Owed To lacal Remained No. Local Authority Spent Amount Clearing Amount classification 50% Authorities 50% amount 1 Albireh Don’t Exist Municipality 1,158,009.14 1,158,009.14 0.00 1,158,009.14 2 Alzaytouneh Don’t Exist Municipality 187,634.51 187,634.51 0.00 187,634.51 3 Altaybeh Don’t Exist Municipality 66,840.07 66,840.07 0.00 66,840.07 4 Almazra'a Alsharqia Don’t Exist Municipality 136,262.16 136,262.16 0.00 136,262.16 5 Banizeid Alsharqia Don’t Exist Municipality 154,092.68 154,092.68 0.00 154,092.68 6 Beitunia Don’t Exist Municipality 599,027.36 599,027.36 0.00 599,027.36 7 Birzeit Don’t Exist Municipality 137,285.22 137,285.22 0.00 137,285.22 8 Tormos'aya Don’t Exist Municipality 113,243.26 113,243.26 0.00 113,243.26 9 Der Dibwan Don’t Exist Municipality 159,207.99 159,207.99 0.00 159,207.99 10 Ramallah Don’t Exist Municipality 832,407.37 832,407.37 0.00 832,407.37 11 Silwad Don’t Exist Municipality 197,183.09 197,183.09 0.00 197,183.09 12 Sinjl Don’t Exist Municipality 158,720.82 158,720.82 0.00 158,720.82 13 Abwein Don’t Exist Municipality 94,535.83 94,535.83 0.00 94,535.83 14 Atara Don’t Exist Municipality 68,813.12 68,813.12 0.00 68,813.12 15 Rawabi Don’t Exist Municipality 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16 Surda - Abu Qash Don’t Exist Municipality 73,806.64 73,806.64 0.00 73,806.64 17 Hay Alkarama Don’t Exist Village Council 7,551.17 7,551.17 0.00 7,551.17 18 Almoghayar Don’t Exist Village Council 71,784.87 71,784.87 0.00 71,784.87 19 Alnabi Saleh Don’t Exist Village Council
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Growing Pains at 60
    Viewpoints Special Edition Israel: Growing Pains at 60 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org The maps on pages 96-103 are copyright The Foundation for Middle East Peace. Our thanks to the Foundation for graciously allowing the inclusion of the maps in this publication. Cover photo in the top row, middle is © Tom Spender/IRIN, as is the photo in the bottom row, extreme left.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2014 Al-Malih Shaqed Kh
    Salem Zabubah Ram-Onn Rummanah The West Bank Ta'nak Ga-Taybah Um al-Fahm Jalameh / Mqeibleh G Silat 'Arabunah Settlements and the Separation Barrier al-Harithiya al-Jalameh 'Anin a-Sa'aidah Bet She'an 'Arrana G 66 Deir Ghazala Faqqu'a Kh. Suruj 6 kh. Abu 'Anqar G Um a-Rihan al-Yamun ! Dahiyat Sabah Hinnanit al-Kheir Kh. 'Abdallah Dhaher Shahak I.Z Kfar Dan Mashru' Beit Qad Barghasha al-Yunis G November 2014 al-Malih Shaqed Kh. a-Sheikh al-'Araqah Barta'ah Sa'eed Tura / Dhaher al-Jamilat Um Qabub Turah al-Malih Beit Qad a-Sharqiyah Rehan al-Gharbiyah al-Hashimiyah Turah Arab al-Hamdun Kh. al-Muntar a-Sharqiyah Jenin a-Sharqiyah Nazlat a-Tarem Jalbun Kh. al-Muntar Kh. Mas'ud a-Sheikh Jenin R.C. A'ba al-Gharbiyah Um Dar Zeid Kafr Qud 'Wadi a-Dabi Deir Abu Da'if al-Khuljan Birqin Lebanon Dhaher G G Zabdah לבנון al-'Abed Zabdah/ QeiqisU Ya'bad G Akkabah Barta'ah/ Arab a-Suweitat The Rihan Kufeirit רמת Golan n 60 הגולן Heights Hadera Qaffin Kh. Sab'ein Um a-Tut n Imreihah Ya'bad/ a-Shuhada a a G e Mevo Dotan (Ganzour) n Maoz Zvi ! Jalqamus a Baka al-Gharbiyah r Hermesh Bir al-Basha al-Mutilla r e Mevo Dotan al-Mughayir e t GNazlat 'Isa Tannin i a-Nazlah G d Baqah al-Hafira e The a-Sharqiya Baka al-Gharbiyah/ a-Sharqiyah M n a-Nazlah Araba Nazlat ‘Isa Nazlat Qabatiya הגדה Westהמערבית e al-Wusta Kh.
    [Show full text]
  • West Bank Barrier Route Projections July 2009
    United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs LEBANON SYRIA West Bank Barrier Route Projections July 2009 West Bank Gaza Strip JORDAN Barta'a ISRAEL ¥ EGYPT Area Affected r The Barrier’s total length is 709 km, more than e v i twice the length of the 1949 Armistice Line R n (Green Line) between the West Bank and Israel. W e s t B a n k a d r o The total area located between the Barrier J and the Green Line is 9.5 % of the West Bank, Qalqilya including East Jerusalem and No Man's Land. Qedumim Finger When completed, approximately 15% of the Barrier will be constructed on the Green Line or in Israel with 85 % inside the West Bank. Biddya Area Populations Affected Ari’el Finger If the Barrier is completed based on the current route: Az Zawiya Approximately 35,000 Palestinians holding Enclave West Bank ID cards in 34 communities will be located between the Barrier and the Green Line. The majority of Palestinians with East Kafr Aqab Jerusalem ID cards will reside between the Barrier and the Green Line. However, Bir Nabala Enclave Biddu Palestinian communities inside the current Area Shu'fat Camp municipal boundary, Kafr Aqab and Shu'fat No Man's Land Camp, are separated from East Jerusalem by the Barrier. Ma’ale Green Line Adumim Settlement Jerusalem Bloc Approximately 125,000 Palestinians will be surrounded by the Barrier on three sides. These comprise 28 communities; the Biddya and Biddu areas, and the city of Qalqilya. ISRAEL Approximately 26,000 Palestinians in 8 Gush a communities in the Az Zawiya and Bir Nabala Etzion e Enclaves will be surrounded on four sides Settlement S Bloc by the Barrier, with a tunnel or road d connection to the rest of the West Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • 78% of Construction Was in “Isolated Settlements”*
    Peace Now’s Annual Settlement Construction Report for 2017 Construction Starts in Settlements were 17% Above Average in 2017 78% of Construction was in “Isolated Settlements”* Settlement Watch, Peace Now Key findings – Construction in the West Bank, 2017 (East Jerusalem excluded) 1 According to Peace Now's count, 2,783 new housing units began construction in 2017, around 17% higher than the yearly average rate since 2009.2 78% (2,168 housing units) of the new construction was in settlements east of the proposed Geneva Initiative border, i.e. settlements that are likely to be evicted in a two-state agreement. 36% (997 housing units) of the new construction was in areas that are east of the route of the separation barrier. Another 46% (1,290 units) was between the built and the planned route of the fence. Only 18% was west of the built fence. At least 10% (282 housing units) of the construction was illegal according to the Israeli laws applied in the Occupied Territories (regardless of the illegality of all settlements according to the international law). Out of those, 234 units (8% of the total construction) were in illegal outposts. The vast majority of the new construction, 91% (2,544 housing units), was for permanent structures, while that the remainder 9% were new housing units in the shape of mobile homes both in outposts and in settlements. 68 new public buildings (such as schools, synagogues etc.) started to be built, alongside 69 structures for industry or agriculture. Advancement of Plans and Tenders (January-December 2017) 6,742 housing units were advanced through promotions of plans for settlements, in 59 different settlements (compared to 2,657 units in 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • English/Deportation/Statistics
    International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion Proceedings On Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Palestine Written Statement (30 January 2004) And Oral Pleading (23 February 2004) Preface 1. In October of 2003, increasing concern about the construction by Israel, the occupying Power, of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, in departure from the Armistice Line of 1949 (the Green Line) and deep into Palestinian territory, brought the issue to the forefront of attention and debate at the United Nations. The Wall, as it has been built by the occupying Power, has been rapidly expanding as a regime composed of a complex physical structure as well as practical, administrative and other measures, involving, inter alia, the confiscation of land, the destruction of property and countless other violations of international law and the human rights of the civilian population. Israel’s continued and aggressive construction of the Wall prompted Palestine, the Arab Group, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) to convey letters to the President of the United Nations Security Council in October of 2003, requesting an urgent meeting of the Council to consider the grave violations and breaches of international law being committed by Israel. 2. The Security Council convened to deliberate the matter on 14 October 2003. A draft resolution was presented to the Council, which would have simply reaffirmed, inter alia, the principle of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force and would have decided that the “construction by Israel, the occupying Power, of a wall in the Occupied Territories departing from the armistice line of 1949 is illegal under relevant provisions of international law and must be ceased and reversed”.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Central District of California
    Case 2:20-cv-06277-FMO-MAA Document 37 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:320 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 20-6277 FMO (MAAx) Date December 14, 2020 Title Yehonatan Kapach v. Intel Corporation, et al. Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Re: Pending Motions Having reviewed and considered the briefing filed with respect to plaintiff Yehonatan Kapach’s (“Kapach” or “plaintiff”) Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. 27, “Plf. Motion”) and Intel Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 22, “Intel Motion”) and the record in this action, the court finds that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the motions, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2001), and concludes as follows. BACKGROUND On July 13, 2020, plaintiff Yehonatan Kapach (“plaintiff” or “Kapach”), a citizen and resident of Israel,1 filed a pro se complaint against his former employer, Intel Corporation (“Intel”) and “several public officials in the State of Israel” including: Dikla Klein Yona (“Yona”); Yehoram Shaked (“Shaked”); Esther Hayut (“Hayut”); Daphna Barak Erez (“Erez”); Anat Baron (“Baron”); Yael Vilner (“Vilner”); Edna Arbel (“Arbel”); David Mintz (“Mintz”); and George Kara (“Kara”) (collectively, “individual defendants”). (See Dkt. 1, Complaint at ¶¶ 1-2, 7, 10, 13-15, 24). Yona is a “magistrate” at the Israel Enforcement and Collections Authority in Tel Aviv, (see id.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding Last Period Defection Within Israeli-Palestinian Final
    Breaking the Stalemate: Avoiding Last Period Defection within Israeli-Palestinian Final Status Negotiations through Statistical Modeling John J. Villa Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a B.A. with Honors From the Political Science Department at Duke University March 31, 2017 1 Forward: --First, I must thank the phenomenal Political Science Department at Duke University and my thesis advisor Dr. Michael C. Munger for their tremendous support while I developed my thesis and during my general education. Dr. Munger’s leadership, creativity, and generosity provided the foundation upon which I write to you, and his impact upon this publication was critical. --To Dr. Abdeslam E. M. Maghraoui, thank you for instructing me in three tremendous Middle East Studies courses and helping me establish the foundational aspects of this publication. Your mentorship and sharing of knowledge provided an entry point into subject matter far beyond anything I ever thought I would reach. -- To Dr. Mbaye Lo, thank you for your unwavering support, challenging materials, and educated discussions. Our long debates in your office are some of my fondest memories of my time in Durham. --To the staff of the Data Visualization Lab staff at Duke University consisting of Mark Thomas, Angela Zoss, John Little, and Jena Happ, your expertise, patience, and assistance in ArcGIS, Open Refine, and general data manipulation were extremely helpful during the computational portion of this publication and for that I thank you. --To Ryan Denniston, your assistance in Microsoft Excel functions and ArcGIS modeling was impeccable. This is, of course, in addition to your generosity, patience, and creatively which I’m sure were tested day after day coding together in the lab as you guided me through the ever-more complex ArcGIS models.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons 2004 - 2005
    Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons 2004 - 2005 BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights i BADIL is a member of the Global Palestine Right of Return Coalition Preface The Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons is published annually by BADIL Resource Center. The Survey provides an overview of one of the largest and longest-standing unresolved refugee and displaced populations in the world today. It is estimated that two out of every five of today’s refugees are Palestinian. The Survey has several objectives: (1) It aims to provide basic information about Palestinian displacement – i.e., the circumstances of displacement, the size and characteristics of the refugee and displaced population, as well as the living conditions of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons; (2) It aims to clarify the framework governing protection and assistance for this displaced population; and (3) It sets out the basic principles for crafting durable solutions for Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons, consistent with international law, relevant United Nations Resolutions and best practice. In short, the Survey endeavors to address the lack of information or misinformation about Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons, and to counter political arguments that suggest that the issue of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons can be resolved outside the realm of international law and practice applicable to all other refugee and displaced populations. The Survey examines the status of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons on a thematic basis. Chapter One provides a short historical background to the root causes of Palestinian mass displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Women's Affairs Technical Committees
    The Women’s Affairs Technical Committee Summary Report – 2010 _________________________________________________________ The Women’s Affairs Technical Committees Summary Report for the period of January 1st. 2010 - December 31st. 2010 1 The Women’s Affairs Technical Committee Summary Report – 2010 _________________________________________________________ - Introduction - General Context o General Demographic Situation o Political Situation o Women lives within Patriarchy and Military Occupation - Narrative of WATC work during 2010 in summary - Annexes 1 and 2 2 The Women’s Affairs Technical Committee Summary Report – 2010 _________________________________________________________ Introduction: This is a narrative summary report covering the period of January 2010 until 31 December 2010. The objective of this report is to give a general overview of the work during 2010 in summary and concise activities. At the same time, there have been other reports presented for specific projects and programs. General Context: Following part of the summary report presents the context on which programs, projects and activities were implemented during 2010. Firstly, it gives a general view of some demographic statistics. Secondly, it presents a brief political overview of the situation, and thirdly it briefly presents briefly some of the main actors that affected the life of Palestinian women during 2010. General Demographic situation: Data from the Palestinian Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) shows that the population of the Palestinian Territory is young; the percentage of individuals in the age group (0- 14) was 41.3% of the total population in the Palestinian Territory at end year of 2010, of which 39.4% in the West Bank and 44.4% in Gaza Strip. As for the elderly population aged (65 years and over) was 3.0% of the total population in Palestinian Territory at end year of 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • HAGGAI PORAT – CURRICULUM VITAE E-Mail: [email protected] • Tel
    HAGGAI PORAT – CURRICULUM VITAE E-mail: [email protected] • Tel. +1 617-460-3170 929 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139 EDUCATION 2020–Present S.J.D. (Law) Candidate, Harvard University Law School Dissertation: Essays on the Regulation of Consumer Algorithms Dissertation supervisors: Professors Oren Bar-Gill, Louis Kaplow & Alma Cohen 2020 LL.M. (Law), Harvard University Law School (degree waved) 2020 (expected) M.A. (Economics), Tel Aviv University and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Schools of Economics (joint research program) (requirements fulfilled, expected 08/2020) 2016 LL.B. (Law) Summa cum Laude, Valedictorian, Tel Aviv University Faculty of Law 2016 B.A. (Economics) Summa cum Laude, Tel Aviv University School of Economics AWARDS, HONORS, SCHOLARSHIPS & FELLOWSHIPS 2020 Harvard Law School John M. Olin Prize in Law and Economics (for the paper "Consumer Protection and Disclosure Rules in the Age of Algorithmic Behavior-Based Pricing") 2019 Harvard Law School LL.M. Gammon Fellowship 2019 Yale Law School LL.M. Scholarship (forfeited) 2019 Tel Aviv Faculty of Social Sciences Merit Scholarship for Graduate Students 2017–2019 Tel Aviv Graduate School of Economics Merit Scholarship (two consecutive years) 2016 Valedictorian, Tel Aviv Faculty of Law Class of 2016 2014–2015 Tel Aviv University Provost's List (two consecutive years) 2014 Dean's List, Tel Aviv School of Economics 2013–2015 Dean's List, Tel Aviv Faculty of Law (three consecutive years) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2020–Present Harvard University Law School, Teaching Fellow Contracts (Prof. Oren Bar-Gill) 2019–Present Harvard University Law School, Research Assistant For Prof. Oren Bar-Gill, in the fields of contracts and consumer law 2017–2019 Tel Aviv University Faculty of Law, Teaching Assistant Behavioral Law & Economics (Prof.
    [Show full text]