DOCSLIB.ORG

Eizirik2009chap79.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eizirik2009chap79.Pdf Carnivores (Carnivora) Eduardo Eizirika,b,* and William J. Murphyc this mammalian order has had its origin in Laurasia. aFaculdade de Biociências, PUCRS, Av. Ipiranga, 6681, Porto Alegre, Only in the Miocene (23–5 Ma) do carnivoran families RS 90619-900, Brazil; bInstituto Pró-Carnívoros, Av. Horácio Neto, appear in the fossil records of Africa and South America, c 1030, Atibaia SP 12945-010, Brazil; Department of Veterinary indicating an initial period of intercontinental dispersal Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX in this group. Here we review the current understand- 77843-4458, USA *To whom correspondence should be addressed (eduardo.eizirik@ ing of the phylogenetic relationships and divergence pucrs.br) times among carnivoran families, focusing exclusively on living lineages, and emphasizing results from recent studies. Abstract Living members of the Order Carnivora are grouped into two monophyletic suborders: Feliformia and Living members of the mammalian Order Carnivora have Caniformia. 7 e former traditionally included Families been traditionally placed in 11 families making up two sub- Viverridae (e.g., civets and genets), Herpestidae (mon- orders: Feliformia and Caniformia. Recent analyses based gooses), Hyaenidae (hyenas), and Felidae (cats), while on morphological and molecular data have identifi ed add- the latter comprised the Families Canidae (dogs, wolves, itional groups of species that warrant family-level recogni- and foxes), Mustelidae (e.g., otters, weasels, and badgers), tion, leading to major changes in the current understanding Ursidae (bears), Procyonidae (e.g., raccoons and coatis), of carnivoran evolutionary history and taxonomy. There Otariidae (sea lions and fur seals), Phocidae (true seals), are presently 16 recognized families, whose relationships and Odobenidae (Walrus). Otariidae, Phocidae, and are now well understood. The carnivoran timetree indicates Odobenidae are highly adapted for marine life and have that Feliformia and Caniformia diverged from each other been historically grouped in a taxon called Pinnipedia. ~55 million years ago (Ma). Within each suborder, suprafa- 7 e monophyly and phylogenetic placement of pin- milial nodes span a broad range of divergence times, from nipeds have been contentious for many years ( 2, 5, 6), 53 to 22 Ma. but this issue seems to be mostly settled now ( 7–10). It is now clear that Pinnipedia is monophyletic and that 7 e Order Carnivora contains a diverse set of mammals, including well-known species such cats, dogs, lions, bears, and seals, as well as enigmatic animals such as the stink badgers (Mydaus spp.), the African Palm Civet (Nandinia binotata), and the Fossa (Cryptoprocta ferox). 7 ere are currently 286 recognized species of living car- nivorans (e.g., Fig. 1), which vary widely in morphology, ecology, physiology, and behavior (1, 2). Size range among carnivoran species is broader than in any other mamma- lian order, with body weight varying 1000 times among its representatives. 7 e Order Carnivora has a relatively rich paleontological record. 7 e earliest fossils, dating from the Paleocene (66–56 Ma), are usually placed in the extinct families Viverravidae and Miacidae (3), both of which likely comprise early branching lineages relative to the living taxa (4). 7 e carnivoran fossil record from Fig. 1 An African Wild Dog (Lycaon pictus), representing the the Paleocene to the Oligocene (34–23 Ma) is conA ned to Family Canidae (Caniformia), from Kruger National Park, South Eurasia and North America (4), supporting the view that Africa. Credit: E. Eizirik. E. Eizirik and W. J. Murphy. Carnivores (Carnivora). Pp. 504–507 in e Timetree of Life, S. B. Hedges and S. Kumar, Eds. (Oxford University Press, 2009). HHedges.indbedges.indb 550404 11/28/2009/28/2009 11:30:22:30:22 PPMM Eukaryota; Metazoa; Vertebrata; Mammalia; Carnivora 505 Mephitidae 9 Mustelidae 12 Procyonidae Ailuridae 7 Otariidae 14 Odobenidae 5 11 Caniformia Phocidae 3 Ursidae Canidae Felidae 8 1 Prionodontidae 4 Hyaenidae 10 Herpestidae 13 6 2 Eupleridae Feliformia Viverridae Nandiniidae Paleogene Neogene CENOZOIC 50 25 0 Million years ago Fig. 2 A timetree of carnivores (Carnivora). Divergence times are shown in Table 1. it is contained in Arctoidea (pinnipeds + Ursidae + carnivoran with unique morphological and behavioral Mustelidae + Procyonidae + Red Panda + skunks (see characteristics oJ en placed in Viverridae, Herpestidae, or later)), which is nested within the carnivoran Suborder in its own monotypic family (1, 2, 26). 7 e last few years Caniformia. have seen a surge in studies on these and other topics of In addition to the argument over the relationships of the carnivoran phylogeny (e.g., 7–10, 18–23) most of which Pinnipedia, several other aspects of the carnivoran tree used concatenations of multiple nuclear and/or mitochon- have been contentious over the last few decades, leading drial genes. 7 is has led to a consistent resolution of most to the production of a large body of literature on the phyl- suprafamilial nodes (Fig. 2), settling many of the disputes ogeny of this mammalian order (e.g., 4–30). Most of the brieP y outlined earlier. 7 e Giant Panda was established eB ort has been traditionally focused on the Caniformia, as the most basal extant ursid, and the Red Panda is now and particularly on the positions of the Giant Panda placed in its own monotypic family (Ailuridae), nested (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens), in Arctoidea. Skunks and stink badgers (Mydaus spp.) and skunks (originally placed in the Mephitinae within are closely related, and together constitute the Family Mustelidae, but now recognized as comprising a separate Mephitidae, which is not immediately connected to the family, Mephitidae). On the feliform side, the monophyly Mustelidae (14, 15, 28). Another recent A nding is that of the Family Viverridae has been challenged multiple Mustelidae and Procyonidae are each other’s closest times, starting with the proposition that the African relatives, an observation which is supported by several Palm Civet (N. binotata) was actually not a member of studies (e.g., 8, 15, 24). 7 ere is a core group in Arctoidea this family, but rather the only living representative of the containing Mephitidae, Ailuridae, and Mustelidae + most basal extant lineage of the Feliformia (e.g., 4, 24, 25). Procyonidae, whose internal structure has still not been Another feliform whose phylogenetic a1 nities have his- conA dently resolved (Fig. 2). Pinnipedia is now seen as torically been enigmatic is the Fossa (C. ferox), a Malagasy the closest relative of this core clade, with Ursidae being HHedges.indbedges.indb 550505 11/28/2009/28/2009 11:30:24:30:24 PPMM 506 THE TIMETREE OF LIFE Table 1. Divergence times (Ma) and their confi dence/credibility intervals (CI) among carnivores (Carnivora). Timetree Estimates Node Time Ref. (19) Ref. (22) Ref. (23) Ref. (30) Ref. (31) Ref. (32) Ref. (33) Time CI Time CI Time CI Time CI Time CI Time CI Time CI 152.9– – ––––– – 55.060–5157.562–5246.257–35 249.0– – 54.6–––43.354–33– – – – – – 344.0––––44––––––––– 441.8– – 47.0–––36.547–29– – – – – – 540.0––––40––––––––– 639.7– – 44.2–––35.245–28– – – – – – 738.0––––38––––––––– 837.833.335–3242.3––––––––––– 935.0––––35––––––––– 1033.8––38.3–––29.238–23–––––– 1130.0––––30––––––––– 1228.0––––28––––––––– 1328.0––31.6–––24.432–18–––––– 14 22.0 – – – – 22 – – – – – – – – – Note: Node times in the timetree represent the mean of time estimates from different studies. the most basal lineage in Arctoidea. Canidae is indeed studies (Fig. 2). Felidae and Prionodontidae are each other’s the most basal family in the Caniformia, supporting the closest relatives, as are Eupleridae and Herpestidae. traditional view that it is the only extant lineage of the Hyaenidae is the closest relative of the Eupleridae + Superfamily Cynoidea. Herpestidae clade. 7 e relative position of Viverridae Among feliforms, recent studies have led to major (now restricted to a monophyletic core group) has not changes in the prevailing views on phylogenetic structure been conA dently established with high support, though and evolutionary history. Two separate studies published most studies indicate that it is more closely related to the in 2003 have shown further evidence of viverrid para- Hyaenidae + Eupleridae + Herpestidae clade (Fig. 2). phyly, and identiA ed novel lineages that are now recog- Although many studies have addressed carnivoran nized as valid families (19, 20). Asian linsangs (Prionodon relationships, few have assessed the age of the inferred spp.), traditionally part of the Viverridae, have been clades using molecular data. 7 e results reviewed here shown to be the closest relative of the Felidae (19), and are drawn mostly from four recent studies, which have are now placed in their own family, Prionodontidae (21). separately addressed each of the two carnivoran sub- Another remarkable A nding was that all Malagasy car- orders (19, 22, 23, 30). 7 e basal divergence between nivores (including the Fossa), traditionally placed in the Feliformia and Caniformia seems to have occurred Viverridae or Herpestidae, comprise a separate, endemic between the Paleocene and the middle Eocene (49–40 monophyletic lineage (20), which is now recognized as Ma), with the dates used here being derived from large Family Eupleridae. In addition, all recent studies that studies involving all placental mammal clades (31, 32) or included Nandinia conA rmed that this taxon is indeed multiple vertebrate groups (33). Within Feliformia, the the most basal feliform, and now constitutes its own divergence between Nandiniidae and the other lineages family, Nandiniidae (1). As a whole, these recent stud- was estimated by one study to be ~43 Ma ( 30), and by ies have challenged not only the monophyly of tradition- another to be ~55 Ma (22); the latter may be an over- ally recognized Viverridae, but also the monophyly of estimate given the branch length observed in multiple Herpestidae, restructuring the feliform phylogeny to a studies between the feliform–caniform split and this large degree.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ECOLOGY and IMMUNE FUNCTION in the SPOTTED HYENA, CROCUTA CROCUTA by Andrew S. Flies a DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State
    ECOLOGY AND IMMUNE FUNCTION IN THE SPOTTED HYENA, CROCUTA CROCUTA By Andrew S. Flies A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Zoology Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior 2012 ABSTRACT ECOLOGY AND IMMUNE FUNCTION IN THE SPOTTED HYENA, CROCUTA CROCUTA By Andrew S. Flies The immune system is one of the most complex physiological systems in animals. In light of this complexity, immunologists have traditionally tried to eliminate genetic and environmental variation by using highly inbred rodents reared in highly controlled and relatively hygienic environments. However, the immune systems of animals evolved in unsanitary, stochastic environments. Furthermore, socio-ecological variables affect the development and activation of immune defenses within an individual, resulting in a high degree of variation in immune defenses even among individuals with similar genetic backgrounds. The conventional immunology approach of eliminating these variables allows us to answer some questions with great clarity, but a fruitful complement is to quantify how the social and ecological factors impact the immune function of animals living in their natural, pathogen-rich environments. Spotted hyenas ( Crocuta crocuta ) have recently descended from carrion feeding ancestors, and they routinely survive infection by a plethora of deadly pathogens, such rabies, distemper virus, and anthrax. Additionally, spotted hyenas live in large, complex societies, called clans, in which the effects of social rank pervade many aspects of hyena biology. High-ranking hyenas have priority of access to food resources, and rank is positively correlated with fitness. However, very little research has been done to understand basic immune function in spotted hyenas or how socio-ecological variables such as rank can affect immune function.
    [Show full text]
  • TROUBLE-MAKING BROWN BEAR URSUS ARCTOS LINNAEUS, 1758 (MAMMALIA: CARNIVORA) – Behavioral PATTERN ANALYSIS of the SPECIALIZED INDIVIDUALS
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 30 Décembre Vol. LIV (2) pp. 541–554 «Grigore Antipa» 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-011-0032-0 TROUBLE-MAKING BROWN BEAR URSUS ARCTOS LINNAEUS, 1758 (MAMMALIA: CARNIVORA) – BEHAVIORal PATTERN ANALYSIS OF THE SPECIALIZED INDIVIDUALS LEONARDO BERECZKY, MIHAI POP, SILVIU CHIRIAC Abstract. In Romania more than 500 damage cases caused by large carnivores are reported by livestock owners and farmers each year. This is the main reason for hunting derogation despite the protected species status. This study is the result of detailed examination of 198 damage cases caused by bears in 2008 and 2009, in the south- eastern Carpathian Mts in Romania. The goal of the study was to examine whether an individual-specific behavioural pattern among problematic bears exists. We looked for bears which showed repeated killing of livestock, a phenomenon claimed by livestock owners to indicate the presence of a problematic individual in the area. In 27% of the observed cases the problematic bears exhibited specific behaviour patterns: clear specialization on a certain type of damage, high degree of tolerance for humans, selectivity for certain prey items, returning back to the damage site in less than 8 days. Fast adaptation and taking advantage of easily obtainable food around human created artificial sources is characteristic for all bear species, due to their high learning capacity and ecological plasticity, but from the conservation and management point of view dealing with individuals which specialize to live mainly around artificial areas becomes a “problem”. Thus defining and identifying individual behaviour patterns oriented towards conflicting behaviour might be useful for wildlife managers in identifying “problem individuals” in order to apply the proper control methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus Arctos and U
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus Benjamin James Hillesheim East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Hillesheim, Benjamin James, "Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3261. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3261 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus ____________________________________ A thesis presented to the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences ____________________________________ by Benjamin Hillesheim May 2017 ____________________________________ Dr. Blaine W. Schubert, Chair Dr. Steven C. Wallace Dr. Josh X. Samuels Keywords: Ursidae, Geometric morphometrics, Ursus americanus, Ursus arctos, Last Glacial Maximum ABSTRACT Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus by Benjamin J. Hillesheim Despite being separated by millions of years of evolution, black bears (Ursus americanus) and brown bears (Ursus arctos) can be difficult to distinguish based on skeletal and dental material alone. Complicating matters, some Late Pleistocene U. americanus are significantly larger in size than their modern relatives, obscuring the identification of the two bears.
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Canis Latrans in 2007 IUCN Red List (Canis Latrans)
    MAMMALS OF MISSISSIPPI 10:1–9 Coyote (Canis latrans) CHRISTOPHER L. MAGEE Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, 39762, USA Abstract—Canis latrans (Say 1823) is a canid commonly called the coyote. It is dog-like in appearance with varied colorations throughout its range. Originally restricted to the western portion of North America, coyotes have expanded across the majority of the continent. Coyotes are omnivorous and extremely adaptable, often populating urban and suburban environments. Preferred habitats include a mixture of forested, open, and brushy areas. Currently, there exist no threats or conservation concerns for the coyote in any part of its range. This species is currently experiencing an increasing population trend. Published 5 December 2008 by the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University Coyote location (Jackson 1951; Young 1951; Berg and Canis latrans (Say, 1823) Chesness 1978; Way 2007). The species is sexually dimorphic, with adult females distinctly CONTEXT AND CONTENT. lighter and smaller than adult males (Kennedy Order Carnivora, suborder Caniformia, et al. 2003; Way 2007). Average head and infraorder Cynoidea, family Canidae, subfamily body lengths are about 1.0–1.5 m with a tail Caninae, tribe Canini. Genus Canis consists length of about Young 1951). The skull of the of six species: C. aureus, C. latrans, C. lupus, coyote (Fig. 2) progresses through 6 distinct C. mesomelas, C. simensis, and C. adustus. developmental stages allowing delineation Canis latrans has 19 recognized subspecies between the age classes of juvenile, immature, (Wilson and Reeder 2005). young, young adult, adult, and old adult (Jackson 1951).
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Anomalies in the Atlantic Population of South American Sea Lion, Otaria Byronia (Pinnipedia, Otariidae): Evolutionary Implications and Ecological Approach
    e-ISSN 2236-1057 - doi:10.5597/lajam00044 http://dx.doi.org/10.5597/lajam00044 LAJAM 3(1): 7-18, January/June 2004 ISSN 1676-7497 DENTAL ANOMALIES IN THE ATLANTIC POPULATION OF SOUTH AMERICAN SEA LION, OTARIA BYRONIA (PINNIPEDIA, OTARIIDAE): EVOLUTIONARY IMPLICATIONS AND ECOLOGICAL APPROACH César Jaeger Drehmer 1, 2 , Marta Elena Fabián 2, 3 and João Oldair Menegheti 3 Abstract – We analyzed 63 cases of dental anomalies from 62 specimens of a total sample of 516 specimens of the Atlantic population of South American sea lions, Otaria byronia de Blainville, 1820. The anomalies were represented by 53 cases of missing upper post-canine 6 (second molars), seven cases of maxillary or mandibular extra teeth, two cases of “dentes geminati” and one case of reduced teeth. Considering a phylogenetic framework where all otariid species and basal Pinnipedimorpha are included, missing post-canine 6 could be related to evolutionary trends in Otariidae towards a progressive reduction and loss of teeth (agenesis). The occurrence of the upper post-canine 6 in Otaria Péron, 1816 as in Phocarctos Peters, 1866 is usually regarded as a primitive character. Alternatively, when adopting another cladistic procedure, this could be interpreted as a taxic atavism at the base of Otaria/Phocarctos clade. Extra-mandibular teeth are related to a concrete case of spontaneous atavism in the dentition of Otaria byronia, in retrogression to ancient groups like the Miocene pinnipediform Pteronarctos Barnes, 1989. The other anomalies – maxillary extra teeth, “dentes geminati” and reduced teeth - are caused by some disturbance on the epigenetic system underlying dental morphogenesis leading to duplication, coalescence or duplication and reduction of the dental germ, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • American Black Bear (Ursus Americanus)
    FIELD GUIDE TO NORTH AMERICAN MAMMALS American Black Bear (Ursus americanus) ORDER: Carnivora FAMILY: Ursidae Most Black Bears hibernate for up to seven months, and do not eat, drink, urinate, or exercise the entire time. In the South, where plant food is available all year, not all bears hibernate—but pregnant females do. The female gives birth to 1−6 cubs (usually 2 or 3) in January, while she is deep asleep in her den. The newborn cubs Ursus americanus − eastern, black variant snuggle next to her for warmth and nurse while she fasts. They grow Credit: painting by Consie Powell from Kays and Wilson's Mammals of North America, © Princeton University Press from a birth weight of 200−450 g each (about 7−16 pounds) to the (2002) 2−5 kg they will weigh when the family leaves the den in the spring. Black Bears eat a little meat, and some insects, but they rely on fruit, nuts, and vegetation for the bulk of their nutritional needs. They are not all black. Most are, with brown muzzles, but in some western forests they are brown, cinnamon, or blond, and a few, in southern Alaska and British Columbia, are creamy white or bluish−gray. Also known as: Many common names are given to the many subspecies that have been described, such as: Olympic Black Bear, Glacier Bear, California Black Bear, Florida Black Bear. Sexual Dimorphism: The largest males may be nearly twice as heavy as the heaviest females. Length: Range: 1,44−2,000 mm males; 1,200−1,600 mm females Weight: Average: 120 kg males; 80 kg females Range: 47−409 kg males; 39−236 kg females http://www.mnh.si.edu/mna 1 FIELD GUIDE TO NORTH AMERICAN MAMMALS Brown Bear, Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos) ORDER: Carnivora FAMILY: Ursidae Conservation Status: The Mexican Grizzly Bear, Ursus arcos nelsoni, is Extinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Status Review for the Steller Sea Lion
    STATE OF WASHINGTON January 2015 Periodic Status Review for the Steller Sea Lion Gary J. Wiles The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife maintains a list of endangered, threatened, and sensitive species (Washington Administrative Codes 232-12-014 and 232-12-011, Appendix E). In 1990, the Washington Wildlife Commission adopted listing procedures developed by a group of citizens, interest groups, and state and federal agencies (Washington Administrative Code 232-12-297, Appendix A). The procedures include how species listings will be initiated, criteria for listing and delisting, a requirement for public review, the development of recovery or management plans, and the periodic review of listed species. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife is directed to conduct reviews of each endangered, threatened, or sensitive wildlife species at least every five years after the date of its listing. The reviews are designed to include an update of the species status report to determine whether the status of the species warrants its current listing status or deserves reclassification. The agency notifies the general public and specific parties who have expressed their interest to the Department of the periodic status review at least one year prior to the five-year period so that they may submit new scientific data to be included in the review. The agency notifies the public of its recommendation at least 30 days prior to presenting the findings to the Fish and Wildlife Commission. In addition, if the agency determines that new information suggests that the classification of a species should be changed from its present state, the agency prepares documents to determine the environmental consequences of adopting the recommendations pursuant to requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act.
    [Show full text]
  • LION FACTS Lions Are Large Carnivorous Mammals That Belong to the Feline Family
    LION FACTS Lions are large carnivorous mammals that belong to the feline family. They have a tawny coat with a long tufted tail. Male lions have a large mane of darker colored fur surrounding their head and neck. Lions are the only cats that have this obvious difference between males and the females. See the fact file below for more information about lions: ● Lions are found in savannas, grasslands, dense bush and woodlands. At one time in history, lions could be found throughout the Middle East, Greece and even in Northern India. ● Today, only a small population of lions live in India. Most lions can be found in Africa, but their numbers are becoming smaller because of the loss of habitat. ● Lions live the longest in captivity. They can reach 25 years of age when cared for in zoos or preserves. In the wild, their existence is much tougher and many lions never reach the age of 10. ● Lions live in groups that are called prides. 10 to 20 lions may live in a pride. Each pride has a home area that is called its territory. LION FACTS Kingdom: Animalia Subclass: Theria Subkingdom: Bilateria Infraclass: Eutheria Infrakingdom: Deuterostomia Order: Carnivora Phylum: Chordata Suborder: Feliformia Subphylum: Vertebrata Family: Felidae Infraphylum: Gnathostomata Subfamily: Pantherinae Superclass: Tetrapoda Genus & species: Panthera leo Class: Mammalia Male Lion Lioness Lion Cubs ● Most cat species live alone, but the lion is the exception. Lions live in a social group called a pride. The average pride consists of about 15 individuals, including five to 10 females with their young and two or three territorial males that are usually brothers or pride mates.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Iktman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin* Wyoming
    Distribution and Stratigraphip Correlation of Upper:UB_ • Ju Paleocene and Lower Eocene Fossil Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Iktman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin* Wyoming U,S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESS IONAL PAPER 1540 Cover. A member of the American Museum of Natural History 1896 expedition enter­ ing the badlands of the Willwood Formation on Dorsey Creek, Wyoming, near what is now U.S. Geological Survey fossil vertebrate locality D1691 (Wardel Reservoir quadran­ gle). View to the southwest. Photograph by Walter Granger, courtesy of the Department of Library Services, American Museum of Natural History, New York, negative no. 35957. DISTRIBUTION AND STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION OF UPPER PALEOCENE AND LOWER EOCENE FOSSIL MAMMAL AND PLANT LOCALITIES OF THE FORT UNION, WILLWOOD, AND TATMAN FORMATIONS, SOUTHERN BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING Upper part of the Will wood Formation on East Ridge, Middle Fork of Fifteenmile Creek, southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. The Kirwin intrusive complex of the Absaroka Range is in the background. View to the west. Distribution and Stratigraphic Correlation of Upper Paleocene and Lower Eocene Fossil Mammal and Plant Localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Tatman Formations, Southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming By Thomas M. Down, Kenneth D. Rose, Elwyn L. Simons, and Scott L. Wing U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1540 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field
    Attachment J Assessment of Existing Paleontologic Data Along with Field Survey Results for the Jonah Field June 12, 2007 ABSTRACT This is compilation of a technical analysis of existing paleontological data and a limited, selective paleontological field survey of the geologic bedrock formations that will be impacted on Federal lands by construction associated with energy development in the Jonah Field, Sublette County, Wyoming. The field survey was done on approximately 20% of the field, primarily where good bedrock was exposed or where there were existing, debris piles from recent construction. Some potentially rich areas were inaccessible due to biological restrictions. Heavily vegetated areas were not examined. All locality data are compiled in the separate confidential appendix D. Uinta Paleontological Associates Inc. was contracted to do this work through EnCana Oil & Gas Inc. In addition BP and Ultra Resources are partners in this project as they also have holdings in the Jonah Field. For this project, we reviewed a variety of geologic maps for the area (approximately 47 sections); none of maps have a scale better than 1:100,000. The Wyoming 1:500,000 geology map (Love and Christiansen, 1985) reveals two Eocene geologic formations with four members mapped within or near the Jonah Field (Wasatch – Alkali Creek and Main Body; Green River – Laney and Wilkins Peak members). In addition, Winterfeld’s 1997 paleontology report for the proposed Jonah Field II Project was reviewed carefully. After considerable review of the literature and museum data, it became obvious that the portion of the mapped Alkali Creek Member in the Jonah Field is probably misinterpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    UNDERSTANDING CARNIVORAN ECOMORPHOLOGY THROUGH DEEP TIME, WITH A CASE STUDY DURING THE CAT-GAP OF FLORIDA By SHARON ELIZABETH HOLTE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2018 © 2018 Sharon Elizabeth Holte To Dr. Larry, thank you ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my family for encouraging me to pursue my interests. They have always believed in me and never doubted that I would reach my goals. I am eternally grateful to my mentors, Dr. Jim Mead and the late Dr. Larry Agenbroad, who have shaped me as a paleontologist and have provided me to the strength and knowledge to continue to grow as a scientist. I would like to thank my colleagues from the Florida Museum of Natural History who provided insight and open discussion on my research. In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Aldo Rincon for his help in researching procyonids. I am so grateful to Dr. Anne-Claire Fabre; without her understanding of R and knowledge of 3D morphometrics this project would have been an immense struggle. I would also to thank Rachel Short for the late-night work sessions and discussions. I am extremely grateful to my advisor Dr. David Steadman for his comments, feedback, and guidance through my time here at the University of Florida. I also thank my committee, Dr. Bruce MacFadden, Dr. Jon Bloch, Dr. Elizabeth Screaton, for their feedback and encouragement. I am grateful to the geosciences department at East Tennessee State University, the American Museum of Natural History, and the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard for the loans of specimens.
    [Show full text]