“A Comparitive Study on Consumer Preference on Soft Drinks”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“A Comparitive Study on Consumer Preference on Soft Drinks” Project On “A COMPARITIVE STUDY ON CONSUMER PREFERENCE ON SOFT DRINKS” Submitted by: Pramod Patel 32 Umesh Pathak 33 Sampath CH 36 Ajit Yadav 46 Rahul Singh 42 Class : S.Y.Bms Under the guidance of Priya Mam ACKNOWLEDGEMENT A word of thanks……………. Before we get into the thick of the things we would like to add a few heartful words for the people who gave unending support right from the stage the idea of the research was conceived. We express our deep sense of gratitude & sincere thanks to those who have helped us in developing this research work. It is impossible to put out or classify the assistance; it is the feeling that matters, & not the value. First of all we would like to express our sincere gratitude to our beloved Priya Mam for giving us an opportunity to do this research & extent his kind co-operation. Deepest appreciation & thanks go to our respective families for their patience & understanding, friends & classmates for their insights comments throughout the research. Above all it is the grace & blessings of God Almighty, which made this, Endeavour a success. - Pramod Patel - Umesh Pathak - Sampath CH - Ajit Yadav - Rahul Singh EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Soft Drinks were common preference among all the individuals, irrespective of their age groups as it had great brand value and great advertisement. Market Research is based on some underlying parameters like: • Changing consumption pattern • Changing income levels • Advertisements • Taste • Status consciousness • Varying lifestyle The study starts with determining the major players in the soft drinks, their overall consumption pattern among the people and ends up with the conclusion as per the state of mind of the average rational human being. Consumer preferences are changing towards healthier food, and thus such a trend will carry on for some time to come. In the soft drinks market of late, most recent new products launched have been focused on the health benefits of the soft drinks, like pomegranate juices, calcium-fortified bottled water and a series of reduced-sugar alternatives, with such features not previously so readily available to or heavily promoted at the target audience. TABLE OF CONTENTS SERIAL NO. TITLE PAGE NO. 1) INTRODUCTION 1.1) Industrial profile 01 1.2) Major players in soft drinks segment 04 1.3) Study of growth of soft drink market 08 1.4) Recent issues 09 2) RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 2.1) Purpose of the study 16 2.2) Objectives of the study 16 2.3) Scope of the study 16 2.4) Research Design 17 2.5) Sampling Technique used 18 2.6) Selection of Sample Size 18 2.7) Sources of Data collection 18 2.8) Statistical Tools Used 18 3) DATA ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS 19 4) SUGGESTIONS 40 5) LIMITATION OF THE STUDY 41 6) CONCLUSION 42 7) ANNEXURE 7.1) Questionnaire 43 8) BIBLIOGRAPHY 44 INTRODUCTION INDUSTRIAL PROFILE The soft-drink industry comprises companies that manufacture nonalcoholic beverages and carbonated mineral waters or concentrates and syrups for the manufacture of carbonated beverages. Naturally occurring bubbling or sparkling mineral waters have been popular for thousands of years: the ancient Greeks believed that such waters had medicinal properties and bathed in them regularly; the Romans established resorts around mineral springs throughout Europe. In the 1500s the village of Spa in Belgium became famous for its waters, which by the early 1600s were sold, in bottles, as far away as London, Eng. Development of the first man-made sparkling or carbonated water is credited to Joseph Priestley, the British scientist who discovered oxygen. In 1772 he invented a method of "pushing" carbon dioxide into water by dissolving it under pressure, thus creating fairly long- lasting bubbles. The technique led to development of the soft-drink industry. By the beginning of the 19th century, carbonated water was being made commercially in France and North America; shortly thereafter, flavours (normally fruit concentrates) were added to enliven the taste. In the 1820s, small carbonated bottling operations were established in Canada, producing carbonated drinks in refillable bottles which were merchandised as medicinal elixirs or tonics. Most soft drinks are still carbonated to give drinks a "tangy bite" and to stimulate the tongue. Furthermore, because scent is an important part of taste, the flavours carried as vapours in the bubbles enhance taste. The principle of "pushing" carbon dioxide is still used, but now the water is first purified in a process known as "polishing." Cooled carbon dioxide is then injected at pressures of 275-550 kilopascals. Some of the early drinks bottled in Canada were called Birch Beer, Ginger Beer, Sarsaparilla, Sour Lemon, None-Such Soda Water and Cream Soda. The first carbonated 1 beverage or "pop" bottles were sealed with corks held tightly in place with a wire binding. Because they had to be stored neck down so that the cork would not dry and allow the carbonation to leak away, they were manufactured with rounded bottoms. By the mid-1800s, soft drinks sold in Canada were packaged in 8-ounce (227.2 ml) round-bottom bottles for about 25 cents a dozen, except ginger beer, which was sold in draught form from wooden kegs. Wired cork closures were used until about 1884 with Codd's Patented Globe Stoppers (25 types in all). Such closures were replaced by the Hutcheson Spring Stopper. The crown cap was introduced around 1905 and improved versions are still widely used, although they are gradually being replaced, especially on larger containers, with reclosable screw caps. Other packaging innovations since the mid-1960s include canned carbonated beverages, nonreturnable glass bottles and containers made from rigid plastics. However, an effort is being made, often through provincial legislation, to increase the use of returnable glass containers. In the industry's early years the number of carbonated-beverage plants increased steadily, most serving small regional markets. In 1929 the industry was made up of 345 production plants and the value of shipments reached $12.3 million. By 1960 the number of plants had increased to 502 and the value of sales to $172.7 million. Subsequently, consolidation began, prompted by improved production, packaging and distribution facilities. By 1973, 337 plants were in production and the value of shipments was $484 million. In 1985, with sales of about $1.8 billion, the industry had 187 plants in production: Newfoundland had 3; PEI, 1; Nova Scotia, 7; New Brunswick, 8; Québec, 66; Ontario, 58; Manitoba, 7; Saskatchewan, 10; Alberta, 13; and BC, 14. Production volume has also increased dramatically: in 1939, soft- drink bottlers produced about 162 million litres of carbonated beverages; by 1967, production passed 758 million litres; in 1986, shipments were estimated at over 2.1 billion litres; and in 1998 that figure rose to 3.5 billion litres. The industry is regulated by both federal and provincial agencies, 3 of the most important being CONSUMER AND CORPORATE AFFAIRS (responsible for the Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act), HEALTH CANADA (which administers the Food and Drugs Act) and Environment Canada (which focuses on environmental matters). The industry is represented by the Canadian Soft Drink Association in Toronto and by several provincial associations. The introduction of diet carbonated beverages has changed the industry's profile. Several years ago, in response to increasing consumer diet consciousness, the industry introduced the first successful sugar-free diet drinks using the artificial sweetener cyclamate. But questions were raised about the safety of this additive and, based on existing scientific data, Health Canada banned its use in Canadian commercial FOODS AND BEVERAGES. This decision, estimated to have cost the industry more than $15 million, was a setback to diet-drink development. The industry turned to saccharin, but this too was eventually banned. Now, a new sugar-free additive, aspartame, has been approved for use in diet soft drinks, and the 2 cyclamate/saccharin situation is not expected to recur because aspartame consists of amino acids, which occur naturally. Aspartame-sweetened diet drinks have had a dramatic effect on the Canadian carbonated-beverage industry. Just before the saccharin ban in 1977, diet drinks accounted for about 10% of the soft-drink market; following the ban the diet share dropped to about 2%, consisting of beverages partially sweetened with small amounts of sugar. In 1982, the first full year that aspartame was used in Canada, diet drinks increased by 15.2% of total soft-drink sales, while the total soft-drink industry grew 8%. In 1987 total soft-drink sales increased 5.3% over 1986, while diet soft-drink sales increased by 10.7%. This single development has encouraged strong growth in the industry. MAJOR PLAYERS IN3 SOFT DRINKS SEGMENT COCA COLA “thanda matlab coca cola!!!” Coca cola has truly remarkable heritage. From a humble beginning in 1886 it has now become the flagship brand of largest manufacturer, distributor of non alcoholic beverages in the world. In India, coca cola was the leading soft drink till 1977 when govt. policies necessitated its departure. Coca cola has made its return to the country in 1993.and made significant investment to ensure that the beverage is available to more and more people in remote as well as inaccessible parts of the world. Coca cola returned to India in 1993 and over the past ten years has captured the imagination of the nation, building strong association with cricket, the thriving cinema industry, music etc. coca cola has been very strongly associated with cricket, sponsoring the world cup in 1996. In 2002, coca cola launched the campaign,”Thanda Matlab coca cola”. in 2003,coke was available for just rs,5 crores in the country. FANTA GHOONTH BHAR SHARARAT KAR LEY!!! Fanta entered the Indian market in year 1996 under the coca cola brand .over the years, Fanta has occupied a strong market place and is identified as “the fun catalyst”.
Recommended publications
  • National Center for Toxicological Research
    National Center for Toxicological Research Annual Report Research Accomplishments and Plans FY 2015 – FY 2016 Page 0 of 193 Table of Contents Preface – William Slikker, Jr., Ph.D. ................................................................................... 3 NCTR Vision ......................................................................................................................... 7 NCTR Mission ...................................................................................................................... 7 NCTR Strategic Plan ............................................................................................................ 7 NCTR Organizational Structure .......................................................................................... 8 NCTR Location and Facilities .............................................................................................. 9 NCTR Advances Research Through Outreach and Collaboration ................................... 10 NCTR Global Outreach and Training Activities ............................................................... 12 Global Summit on Regulatory Science .................................................................................................12 Training Activities .................................................................................................................................14 NCTR Scientists – Leaders in the Research Community .................................................. 15 Science Advisory Board ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pepsico Analysis 1
    Running head: PEPSICO ANALYSIS 1 PepsiCo Analysis Lynn University PEPSICO ANALYSIS 2 PepsiCo Analysis Short description of the company background. Pepsi-Cola was founded in the late 1890s by Caleb Bradham, and Frito-Company was created in 1932 by Elmer Doolin. In 1961, Frito Company merged with Lay Company. Pepsi was established in 1965 when Frito-Lays and Pepsi-Cola merged (PepsiCo. 2018). In 1964 Diet Pepsi was created and in 1974 Pepsi was the first American product to be sold in the Soviet Union (PepsiCo. 2018). In 1985 Pepsi was available in over one-hundred and fifty countries and had become the largest company in the soft beverage industry (PepsiCo. 2018). In the early nineties, Pepsi partners with Starbucks and Unilever to develop teas and coffee drinks. In the early two- thousands, South Beach Beverage Co. is acquired by Pepsi, and Sierra Mist is launched (PepsiCo. 2018). Pepsi becomes one of the first companies to incorporate Corporate Social Responsibility by introducing an initiative of independence between society and large corporations (PepsiCo. 2018). A performance with purpose focuses on delivering long-term growth while helping the environment and society. This program saved over six-hundred million people and had helped gear the company towards a healthier product line by cutting down sugars and improving the nutrition. Today, Pepsi is the second largest competitor in the soft drink industry, and their products are sold in over two-hundred countries. Industry analysis on the Strength / Weakness / Opportunities / Threats of the company. Strengths: Massive portfolio: PepsiCo manages a big portfolio of more than a hundred different brands.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Clean-Label Beverages
    Beverages Clean Label March 2014 ww Crystal Clean: Designing Clean-Label Beverages By Kimberly J. Decker, Contributing Editor All it took to turn “brominated vegetable oil” into a household name was a bottle of Gatorade, a 15- year-old and an online petition. Those were the three simple, increasingly familiar ingredients that, when combined and agitated at Internet speed in late 2012, aproduced the most recent brouhaha to emerge over a “chemical-sounding” additive to our foods and beverages. To recap, Sarah Kavanagh, a Hattiesburg, MS, teenager, noticed brominated vegetable oil (BVO) among the ingredients on her sports drink’s label and, not knowing what it was, turned to Google for clarity. Alarmed to find results linking BVO to everything from neurological damage to hormone disruption and skin lesions, she did what any other digitally empowered “netizen” would do and launched an online petition asking Gatorade’s parent company, PepsiCo, Purchase, NY, to stop using BVO in the sports drink and its other brands that contain it, like Mountain Dew. The petition racked up more than 200,000 signatures within months, and though PepsiCo denies any direct influence on their decision, the company announced the phasing out of BVO from Gatorade— though not Mountain Dew—in January 2013. The lesson: these days, perception is reality, and in a wired world even a misperception can shape millions of mindsets in the time it takes to tap a finger. As Kelly Newsome, corporate communications, GNT USA, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, says: “Consumers do care about what’s in the foods and beverages they consume.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT KANYUCK, KELSEY M. Weighting Agent and Flavor
    ABSTRACT KANYUCK, KELSEY M. Weighting Agent and Flavor Compound Interactions: the Impacts of Concentration, Chemistry, and Oil Composition for Application in Beverage Emulsions (Under the direction of Dr. Christopher Daubert). Widely used in beverages, such as lemon-lime sodas and orange sports drinks, beverage weighting agents (WAs) are added to flavor oils to increase stability of the emulsion. Flavor oils have a low density, and the high density WAs increase the overall oil phase density, near the aqueous phase density, to inhibit gravitational separation. Common WAs in the United States are sucrose acetate isobutyrate (SAIB), brominated vegetable oil (BVO), and ester gum (EG). Due to consumer demands for ‘clean’ ingredients, companies have begun assessing the replacement of traditional WAs for newer WAs. Ingredient substitutions commonly alter properties of a product, and the effects of replacing WAs on flavor has not been previously addressed. This thesis addresses the impacts of WA chemistry and concentration on volatile components of flavor oils. With the addition of WAs or chemical analogs, changes in flavor compound volatility were measured with headspace gas chromatograph mass spectrometry (GC-MS). A greater concentration of WA corresponded to a greater decrease in flavor compound availability (indicating a smaller RHI), although individual molecules responded differently. The chemistry and concentration of flavor molecules affected the magnitude of changes in volatility with WA addition. Multivariate clustering and modeling was used to assess the importance of molecule chemistry in the association strength to WAs with each flavor compound, and oxygenated compounds with the greatest polarity and polarizability (such as citronellal and citral) had the strongest associations with WAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Sergio Zyman
    SERGIO ZYMAN I spoke with Sergio on a wide number of topics in December of 2009 relating to Killing Giants, but our conversation has helped me think through a good number of complex issues and has served as the source material for more than a few blog posts. If you’re not familiar, Sergio was Coca Cola’s first Chief Marketing Officer, has done extended stints at rival Pepsi and elsewhere. He’s also a prolific author, having written The End of Marketing As We Know It and others. So without further ado, here’s my slightly abridged interview with Sergio. Sergio Zyman: People love to talk about change but at the end, some people hate change because it's uncomfortable. Most of change happens on the edges. It never really happens on the core. Nobody really goes and attacks an existing brand on the basis of its core value proposition. You should try to go and attack it on the edges because you tend to get less defence from whoever you're attacking. There are ton of stories in that regard. It has to come out with something that was captured in the edge. The Sprite campaign—the "Obey Your Thirst" campaign was—was different, because Sprite was a brand that got created in the 50s only because the company had excess production capacity in the UK and the Brits used to drink lemonade, you know. So somebody came up with the idea that maybe they could launch a lemon- lime drink that had absolutely no proprietary or anything, you know.
    [Show full text]
  • Level 4 Coca Cola Changes Recipe After Online Petition
    www.Breaking News English.com Ready-to-Use English Lessons by Sean Banville “1,000 IDEAS & ACTIVITIES Thousands more free lessons FOR LANGUAGE TEACHERS” from Sean's other websites www.breakingnewsenglish.com/book.html www.freeeslmaterials.com/sean_banville_lessons.html Level 4 Coca Cola changes recipe after online petition 9th May, 2014 http://www.breakingnewsenglish.com/1405/140509-coca-cola-4.html Contents The Reading 2 Matching 3 Listening Gap Fill 4 Survey 5 Discussion 6 Writing 7 Please try the harder Level 5 and the 26-page Level 6 (harder). Twitter twitter.com/SeanBanville Facebook www.facebook.com/pages/BreakingNewsEnglish/155625444452176 Google + https://plus.google.com/+SeanBanville THE READING From http://www.breakingnewsenglish.com/1405/140509-coca-cola-4.html An online petition made the Coca-Cola Company change its recipe for several drinks. The world's largest drinks maker will remove a substance called brominated vegetable oil (BVO) from drinks like Powerade. BVO is a food additive. It contains the chemical bromide, which is used in products to prevent fires. A Coca-Cola spokesman said: "All of our beverages, including those with BVO, are safe….The safety and quality of our products is our highest priority." The U.S. government removed BVO from its "generally recognised as safe" list in 1970. A few months ago, an American teenager started a petition to get BVO removed from drinks. She asked why it was put in health drinks. Over 200,000 people signed the petition. The teen said: "It's really good to know that companies…are listening to consumers." She added was glad that drinks around the world would "be a little bit healthier without BVO".
    [Show full text]
  • Freequency Rewards®
    ® FREEQUENCY REWARDS OVER 700 ITEMS TO MIX & MATCH! 100 GRAND PRE-PRICED 2/$3 20oz ICED TEA 20z CRUSH GRAPE 100oz FOUNTAIN REFILL 20oz MONSTER MUTANT 20z CRUSH ORANGE 12oz CAPPUCINO 20oz MONSTER RED DAWN 20z CRUSH STRAWBERRY 12oz COFFEE 20oz UNSWEET TEA 20z CRYSTAL PEPSI 12oz COFFEE REFILL 20z 7UP 20z DIET 7UP 12oz FOUNTAIN 20z A&W CREAM SODA 20z DIET A&W ROOT BEER 12oz HOT CHOCOLATE 20z A&W ROOT BEER 20z DIET ALE 8 12oz JUICE 20z A&W ROOT BEER TEN CALORIE 20z DIET CODE RED 12oz KIDS HOT CHOCOLATE 20z ALE 8 20z DIET COKE 16oz CAPPUCINO 20z BARQS RED CRÈME 20z DIET DR PEP CHERRY 16oz COFFEE 20z BARQS ROOT BEER 20z DIET DR PEPPER 16oz COFFEE REFILL 20z BIG BLUE 20z DIET LIME PEPSI 16OZ FIZZFREEZ 20z BIG RED 20z DIET MOUNTAIN DEW 16oz FIZZFREEZ REFILL 20z BIG RED ZERO 20z DIET MOUNTAIN DEW SUPER NOVA 16oz FOUNTAIN 20z CAFFEINE FREE DIET COKE 20z DIET MOUNTAIN DEW ULTRA VIOLET 16oz FROZEN BEVERAGE 20z CAFFEINE FREE DIET PEPSI 20z DIET MOUNTAIN DEW VOLTAGE 16oz ICED COFFEE 20z CAFFEINE FREE PEPSI 20z DIET PEPSI 16oz ICED TEA 20z CANADA DRY GINGER ALE 20z DIET PEPSI CLASSIC 16oz KIDS FIZZFREEZ® 20z CANADA DRY GINGER ALE TEN CALORIE 20z DIET PEPSI JAZZ 16oz REFILL 69¢ COLD DISPENSED 20z CHEERWINE 20z DIET PEPSI MAX 16oz REFILL 69¢ HOT DISPENSED 20z CHERRY 7UP 20z DIET RITE COLA 16oz UNSWEET TEA 20z CHERRY COKE 20z DIET SIERRA CRANBERRY 16z FIZZFREEZ® PLASTIC 20z CHERRY COKE ZERO 20z DIET SKI 20oz CAPPUCINO 20z CHERRY PEPSI 20z DIET SUNDROP 20oz COFFEE 20z CHERRY SKI 20z DIET SUNKIST LEMONADE 20oz Coffee 49¢ 20z CHERRY VANILLA PEPSI 20z DIET
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrition Facts
    1 BURGER KING® USA Nutritionals: Core, Regional and Limited Time Offerings JUNE 2015 Nutrition Facts serving (g) serving size Calories Calories from fat Total fat (g) Saturated Fat (g) Trans Fat (g) Chol (mg) Sodium (mg) Total Carb (g) Dietary Fiber (g) Protein (g) Total Sugar (g) WHOPPER® Sandwiches WHOPPER® Sandwich 290 650 340 37 11 1.5 60 910 50 2 12 22 w/o Mayo 268 510 200 22 8 1.5 55 790 50 2 12 22 WHOPPER® Sandwich with Cheese 312 730 400 44 15 2 85 1260 51 2 13 26 w/o Mayo 291 600 260 29 13 1.5 75 1140 51 2 13 26 DOUBLE WHOPPER® Sandwich 375 900 510 56 19 3 115 980 50 2 12 35 w/o Mayo 353 770 370 41 17 2.5 105 860 50 2 12 35 DOUBLE WHOPPER® Sandwich with Cheese 397 990 570 63 23 3 135 1330 51 2 13 40 w/o Mayo 376 850 420 48 21 3 130 1220 51 2 13 39 TRIPLE WHOPPER® Sandwich 455 1160 670 75 27 4 170 1050 50 2 12 49 w/o Mayo 434 1020 540 60 25 4 160 930 49 2 12 48 WHOPPER JR.® Sandwich 138 300 150 16 4.5 0.5 25 460 27 1 7 9 w/o Mayo 131 240 90 10 3.5 0.5 25 410 27 1 6 10 WHOPPER JR.® Sandwich with Cheese 153 350 190 21 7 1 40 640 28 1 7 12 w/o Mayo 132 280 120 13 6 0.5 40 580 27 1 7 12 FLAME BROILED BURGERS Big King™ 198 530 280 31 11 1.5 75 790 38 2 8 19 A.1.® Ultimate Bacon Cheeseburger 294 820 460 51 22 3 140 1370 37 1 8 39 A.1.® Hearty Mozzarella Bacon Cheeseburger 313 790 430 48 21 0 190 1410 39 1 9 52 Hamburger 100 230 80 9 3 0 25 460 26 1 6 9 Cheeseburger 111 270 110 12 5 0.5 35 630 27 1 7 11 Double Hamburger 128 320 140 15 6 1 45 450 26 1 6 14 Double Cheeseburger 142 360 170 19 8 1 60 670 27 1 7 16 Extra Long Cheeseburger
    [Show full text]
  • A Project Report on At
    A Project Report On “Channel Satisfaction” At Lumbini Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Hajipur Under The Guidance of Mr.Rakesh Ranjan [(Head-Marketing & Training), PEPSI, Patna (Bihar)] In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the award of “Post Graduate Diploma In Management” (PGDM) Academic Session 2012-2014 Internal Guide Submitted By Dr.Monika Suri Abhishek Kumar Singh (Associate Prof.:-Marketing) Enrollment No.:-0122PGM031 Doon Business School, Dehradun Doon Business School-Global Behind Pharma City, Mi-122 Selaqui,Dehradun Tel:-0135-2699085 i Channel Satisfaction DECLARATION I, ‘Abhishek Kumar Singh’ declaring that all the information given in this project report is true and correct as far as I know. I am also declaring that all the work in this project is done by me and not copied from anywhere. Abhishek Kumar Singh Enrollment No-0122PGM031 Session- 2012-14 ii Channel Satisfaction iii Channel Satisfaction PREFACE There is a famous saying “The theory without practical is lame and practical without theory is blind.” This modern era is era of consumers. Consumers satisfy themselves according to their needs and desires, so they choose that commodity from where they extract maximum satisfaction. It has been identified that in the beginning of 21st century the market was observed a drastic change. The successful brand presents itself in such a way that buyers buy them in special values which match their needs. Marketing is an important part of any business and advertisement is the most important part of marketing. Summer training is an integral part of the PGDM and student of Management have to undergo training session in a business organization for 2 months to gain some practical knowledge in their specialization and to gain some working experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry and Technology of Soft Drinks and Fruit Juices
    Chemistry and Technology of Soft Drinks and Fruit Juices Chemistry and Technology of Soft Drinks and Fruit Juices EDITED BY Philip R. Ashurst THIRD EDITION This edition first published 2016 © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Registered Office John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Editorial Offices 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030‐5774, USA For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley‐blackwell. The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author(s) have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Brominated Vegetable Oil in Soft Drinks – an Underrated Source of Human Organobromine Intake ⇑ Paul Bendig, Lisa Maier, Walter Vetter
    Food Chemistry 133 (2012) 678–682 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Food Chemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchem Brominated vegetable oil in soft drinks – an underrated source of human organobromine intake ⇑ Paul Bendig, Lisa Maier, Walter Vetter University of Hohenheim, Institute of Food Chemistry, Garbenstrasse 28, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany article info abstract Article history: In North America brominated vegetable oil (BVO) is frequently used as a clouding agent for soft drinks. Received 6 July 2011 BVO containing soft drinks have a market share of about 15% in the USA. In our study we analysed several Received in revised form 18 November 2011 soft drinks from North America for BVO and calculated exposures from our results and consumption data. Accepted 19 January 2012 Based on a mean content of 8 ppm in BVO-containing soft drinks, the average daily human intake of BVO Available online 31 January 2012 exceeds the intake of other organobromine compounds, e.g., polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), by >4000 times for adults and >1000 times for children. By comparing the patterns of the brominated fatty Keywords: acids (BFA) in the soft drinks, we were able to distinguish three BVO products used by three soft drink Organobromine compounds manufacturers. The analysis also revealed that the predominant BFAs in BVO are the Br -18:0 (bromin- Brominated vegetable oil 2 Soft drink ation product of oleic acid) and Br4-18:0 (bromination product of linoleic acid). Food additives Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Human exposure 1. Introduction (normally 0.91–0.95 g/cm3 (Myers, 1991), they would gradually separate from the water phase.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Customer Satisfaction Towards the Soft Drink with Special Reference to Pepsi and Coca-Cola
    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION TOWARDS THE SOFT DRINK WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PEPSI AND COCA-COLA INTRODUCTION Pepsi was founded in New York in 1965. It is Producing Non-alcoholic beverage and Food processing items. Pepsi is a carbonated beverage that is produced and manufactured by PepsiCo. It is sold in retail stores, restaurants cinemas and from vending machines. The drink was first made in the 1890s by pharmacist Caleb Bradham in New Bern, North Carolina. The brand was trademarked on June 16, 1903. Pepsi arrived on the market in India in 1988.PepsiCo gained entry to India in 1988 by creating a joint venture with the Punjab government-owned Punjab Agro Industrial Corporation (PAIC) and Volta’s India Limited. This joint venture marketed and sold Lehar Pepsi until 1991, when the use of foreign brands was allowed; PepsiCo bought out its partners and ended the joint venture in 1994. Others claim that firstly Pepsi was banned from import in India, in 1970, for having refused to release the list of its ingredients and in 1993, the ban was lifted, with Pepsi arriving on the market shortly afterwards. These controversies are a reminder of "India’s sometimes acrimonious relationship with huge multinational companies." Indeed, some argue that PepsiCo and The Coca- Cola Company have "been major targets in part because they are well-known foreign companies that draw plenty of attention." Ingredients Pepsi-Cola contains basic ingredients found in most other similar drinks including carbonated water, high fructose corn syrup, sugar, colorings, phosphoric acid, caffeine, citric acid, and natural flavors.
    [Show full text]