Celebrating 40 Years of Linguistics at Lancaster

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

LAEL40 Celebrating 40 Years of Linguistics at Lancaster The event will take place in the LICA Building (Nr 4 on the campus map), unless otherwise specified. Friday 11 July 2014 Welcome and Official Opening 9.00am to 9.30am Tony McEnery (Dean, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences) Geoffrey Leech Elena Semino (Head of Department, LAEL) Pragmatics and Stylistics at Lancaster Chair: Veronika Koller 9.30am to 10.30am Geoffrey Leech Mick Short Followed by round table discussion with members of staff (Jonathan Culpeper, Claire Hardaker, Elena Semino) and audience Q&A 10.30am to 11.00am Coffee and tea break Discourse Studies at Lancaster Chair: Patrick Rebuschat 11.00am to 12.00pm Norman Fairclough Ruth Wodak Followed by round table discussion with members of staff (Chris Hart, Veronika Koller, Greg Myers, Johnny Unger) and audience Q&A 12.00pm to 1.00pm Lunch break Demonstration of Equipment for Language Research Chair: Patrick Rebuschat 1.00pm to 2.00pm A demonstration of research equipment and software used by staff of the Department of Linguistics and English Language and the ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science (CASS) (Claire Hardaker, Sam Kirkham, Silke Brandt, Marije Michel, Claire Nance) Friday 11 July 2014 (continued) Language Learning and Teaching at Lancaster Chair: Elena Semino 2.00pm to 3.00pm Alan Waters Alison Mackey Followed by round table discussion with members of staff (Judit Kormos, Jenefer Philp, Diane Potts, Patrick Rebuschat) and audience Q&A 3.00pm to 3.30pm Coffee and tea break Language Testing at Lancaster Chair: Elena Semino 3.30pm to 4.30pm Charles Alderson Dianne Wall Followed by round table discussion with members of staff (Tineke Brunfaut, Luke Harding) and audience Q&A Public Lecture (Lancaster Town Hall) 6.00pm to 7.15pm David Crystal and Hilary Crystal: How to be an English language tourist Anniversary Dinner (Lancaster Town Hall) 7.45pm This event includes a performance by David and Hilary Crystal on Shakespeare’s Original Pronunciation, and musical entertainment by current members of staff (Dan Johnson, Luke Harding, Chris Hart, Sam Kirkham, Veronika Koller, Geoffrey Leech, Marije Michel, Johnny Unger, Daniël Van Olmen). Saturday 12 July 2014 Literacy Studies at Lancaster Chair: Patrick Rebuschat 9.30am to 10.30am David Barton Roz Ivanič Followed by round table discussion with members of staff (Julia Gillen, Uta Papen, Karin Tusting) and audience Q&A 10.30am to 11.00am Coffee and tea break Corpus Linguistics at Lancaster Chair: Veronika Koller 11.00am to 12.00pm Geoffrey Leech Tony McEnery Followed by round table discussion with members of staff (Paul Baker, Daniël Van Olmen, Richard Xiao [tbc]) and audience Q&A Panel and Audience Discussion : Linguistics in the Professions Chair: Veronika Koller 12.00pm to 12.45pm Panellists include current members of staff and alumni (Geoff Barton, Willem Hollmann, Robert Scott) Closing Statements 12.45pm to 1.00pm Elena Semino and Greg Myers .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Does Washback Exist?
DOCUMENT RESUME FL 020 178 ED 345 513 AUTHOR Alderson, J. Charles; Wall,Dianne TITLE Does Washback Exist? PUB DATE Feb 92 Symposium on the NOTE 23p.; Paper presented at a Educational and Social Impactsof Language Tests, Language Testing ResearchColloquium (February 1992). For a related document, seeFL 020 177. PUB TYPE Reports - Evaluative/Feasibility(142) Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Classroom Techniques;Educational Environment; Educational Research; EducationalTheories; Foreign Countries; Language Research;*Language Tests; *Learning Processes; LiteratureReviewa; Research Needs; Second LanguageInstruction; *Second Languages; *Testing the Test; Turkey IDENTIFIERS Nepal; Netherlands; *Teaching to ABSTRACT The concept of washback, orbackwash, defined as the influence of testing oninstruction, is discussed withrelation to second second language teaching andtesting. While the literature of be language testing suggests thattests are commonly considered to powerful determiners of whathappens in the classroom, Lheconcept of washback is not well defined.The first part of the discussion focuses on the concept, includingseveral different interpretations of the phenomenon. It isfound to be a far more complextopic than suggested by the basic washbackhypothesis, which is alsodiscussed and outlined. The literature oneducation in general is thenreviewed for additional information on theissues involved. Very little several research was found that directlyrelated to the subject, but studies are highlighted.Following this, empirical research on language testing is consulted forfurther insight. Studies in Turkey, the Netherlands, and Nepal arediscussed. Finally, areas for additional research are proposed,including further definition of washback, motivation and performance,the role of educational explanatory setting, research methodology,learner perceptions, and factors. A 39-item bibliography isappended.
[Show full text]
Geoffrey Neil Leech Summary of Curriculum Vitae April 1994
Goeffrey Leech PUBLICATIONS A. Books 1. G. N. Leech (1966), English in Advertising, London: Longman, pp.xiv + 240 2. G. N. Leech (1969), A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry, London: Longman, pp.xiv + 240 3. G. N.Leech (1969), Towards a Semantic Description of English, London: Longman pp.xiv + 277 4. G. N. Leech (1971), Meaning and the English Verb, London: Longman, pp.xiv + 132 (2nd and 3rd editions: 1987, 2004) 5. R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik (1972), A Grammar of Contemporary English, London: Longman, pp.xii + 1120 6. G. Leech (1974), Semantics, London: Penguin, pp.xii + 386 (2nd edition, entitled Semantics: the Study of Meaning, 1981) 7. G. Leech and J. Svartvik (1975), A Communicative Grammar of English, London: Longman, pp.324 (2nd and 3rd editions: 1994, 2002) 8. G. Leech (1980), Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics, Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp.viii + 133 9. S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J Svartvik (eds.) (1980), Studies in English Linguistics: for Randolph Quirk, London: Longman, pp.xvi + 304 10. G. N. Leech and M. H. Short (1981), Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose, London: Longman, pp. xiv + 402 (2nd edition, 2007) 11. G. Leech, M. Deuchar and R. Hoogenraad (1982), English Grammar for Today: a New Introduction, London: Macmillan, pp.xvi + 224 (2nd edition, 2006) 12. G. Leech, (1983), Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman, pp.xiv + 250 13. R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik (1985), A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman pp. xii + 1779 14. G. Leech and C.
[Show full text]
Corpus Linguistics 2013: Conference Programme
Corpus Linguistics 2013: Conference Programme WORKSHOP DAY (MONDAY 22nd JULY) – see separate programme(s) DAY 1: TUESDAY 23rd JULY 9:00-11:00 Registration Faraday Building Foyer 10:45-11:00 Opening of the conference Faraday Lecture Theatre 11:00-12:00 Plenary session: Michael Hoey (with Matthew Brook O’Donnell) The textual dimensions of Lexical Priming Faraday Lecture Theatre Chair: Tony McEnery 12:00-1:00 Discourse #1 Stylistics Grammar #1 Lexis and lexicography #1 Frankland Lecture Theatre Cavendish Lecture Theatre Frankland Colloquium Room Cavendish Colloquium Room Chair: Marina Bondi Chair: Mike Scott Chair: Stefan Evert Chair: Tony McEnery Lan-fen Huang Jonathan Culpeper, Jane Anna Čermáková, František Petra Storjohann A complementary approach to Demmen Čermák Lexical, corpus-methodological corpus study: a text-based Using lockwords to investigate It was X that type of cleft and lexicographic approaches to exploration of the factors in the similarities in Early Modern sentences and their Czech paronyms (non-)use of discourse markers English drama by Shakespeare equivalents in InterCorp and other contemporaneous playwrights Matthew Peacock Michaela Mahlberg, Kathy Katrin Menzel Isabella Chiari Stance adverbials in research Conklin A corpus linguistic study of Basic vocabulary and absolute writing Reading Dickens’s characters: ellipsis as a cohesive device homonyms: a corpus-based investigating the cognitive evaluation reality of patterns in texts 1 DAY 1: TUESDAY 23rd JULY (cont’d) 1:00-2:00 Lunch County Dining Room / County Lecture
[Show full text]
Discourse Strategies of Fake News in the Anti
LCM LINGUE CULTURE MEDIAZIONI LANGUAGES CULTURES MEDIATION 6 (2019) 1 Discursive Representations of Controversial Issues in Medicine and Health La rappresentazione discorsiva di questioni controverse in ambito medico e sanitario Edited by / A cura di Giuliana Elena Garzone, Maria Cristina Paganoni, Martin Reisigl Editorial Discursive Representations of Controversial Issues in Medicine 5 and Health Giuliana Elena Garzone, Maria Cristina Paganoni, and Martin Reisigl Discourse Strategies of Fake News in the Anti-vax Campaign 15 Stefania Maria Maci “Facts” and “Feelings” in the Discursive Construction 45 of the “Best Interests of a Child”: The Charlie Gard Case Judith Turnbull “Designer Babies” and “Playing God”: Metaphor, Genome Editing, 65 and Bioethics in Popular Science Texts Elisa Mattiello Exploring Health Literacy: Web-based Genres in Disseminating 89 Specialized Knowledge to Caregivers. The Case of Paediatric Neurological Disorders Silvia Cavalieri and Giuliana Diani Governing (Their) Bodies: A Linguistic Perspective 107 on the Deterrence vs. Education Debate within the Anti-doping Community Dermot Brendan Heaney Lingue Culture Mediazioni / Languages Cultures Mediation – 6 (2019) 1 https://www.ledonline.it/LCM-Journal/ - Online issn 2421-0293 - Print issn 2284-1881 3 Contents / Sommario An Inquiry into Discursive News Coverage, Popularization 131 and Presuppositions Concerning Military PTSD Treatment Options Roxanne Barbara Doerr Authors / Autori 153 Lingue Culture Mediazioni / Languages Cultures Mediation – 6 (2019) 1 https://www.ledonline.it/LCM-Journal/ - Online issn 2421-0293 - Print issn 2284-1881 4 Discourse Strategies of Fake News in the Anti-vax Campaign * Stefania Maci doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.7358/lcm-2019-001-maci Abstract Anti-vaccine controversial debates have been occurring for more than a century.
[Show full text]
British Council, London (England). English Language *Communicative Competence
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 258 440 FL 014 475 AUTHOR Alderson, J. Charles, 54.; Hughes, Arthur, Ed. TITLE Issues in Language Testing. ELT Documents 111. INSTITUTION British Council, London (England). English Language and Literature Div. REPORT NO ISBN-0-901618-51-9 PUB DATE 81 NOTE 211p, PUB TYPE Collected Works - General (020)-- Reports - Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Communicative Competence (Languages); Conference Proceedings; *English (Second Language); *English for Special Purposes; *Language Proficiency; *Language Tests; Second Language Instruction; Test Validity ABSTRACT A symposium focusing on problems in the assessment of foreign or second language learning brought seven applied linguists together to discuss three areas of debate: communicative language testing, testing of English for specific purposes, and general language proficiency assessment. In each of these areas, the participants reviewed selected papers on the topic, reacted to them on paper, and discussed them as a group. The collected papers, reactions, and discussion reports on communicative language testing include the following: "Communicative Language Testing: Revolution or Evolution" (Keith Morrow) ancl responses by Cyril J. Weir, Alan Moller, and J. Charles Alderson. The next section, 9n testing of English for specific purposes, includes: "Specifications for an English Language Testing Service" (Brendan J. Carroll) and responses by Caroline M. Clapham, Clive Criper, and Ian Seaton. The final section, on general language proficiency, includes: "Basic Concerns /Al Test Validation" (Adrian S. Palmer and Lyle F. Bachman) and "Why Are We Interested in General Language Proficiency'?" (Helmut J. Vollmer), reactions of Arthur Hughes and Alan Davies, and the `subsequent response of Helmut J. Vollmer.
[Show full text]
Matthew H. Ciscel
MATTHEW H. CISCEL CURRICULUM VITÆ (last revised 9/14/2017) Professor and TESOL Coordinator 214 Beacon Street Department of English Hartford, CT 06105, U.S.A. Central Connecticut State University (1-860) 232-5223 1615 Stanley Street personal e-mail: [email protected] New Britain, CT 06050-4010 U.S.A. university e-mail: [email protected] (1-860) 832-2749 URL: http://www2.ccsu.edu/faculty/CiscelM EDUCATION 2002 Ph.D. in Linguistics, Areas: sociolinguistics and second language acquisition theory, University of South Carolina, Columbia (August 1998-December 2002) Dissertation Title: Language and Identity: L2 acquisition in post-Soviet Moldova 1996 M.A. in German, Areas: Germanic linguistics and 20th Century German culture, University of Iowa, Iowa City (August 1993-May 1996) 1991 B.A. cum laude in German, Areas: German and psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville (Sept 1987-Aug 1991) 1989-1990 Academic exchange to Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany (course work in German language and literature, and psychology) ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2012-present Full Professor, Department of English, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT 2007-2012 Associate Professor, Department of English, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT (tenure granted 2008) Spring 2010 Senior Fulbright Scholar, Faculty of Letters and Arts, Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, România 2002-2007 Assistant Professor, Department of English, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT Fall 2001 Visiting Instructor, Faculty of Modern Languages,
[Show full text]
Professor Dr Dr H.C. Ruth Wodak, Acss Distinguished Professor of Discourse Studies
Professor Dr Dr h.c. Ruth Wodak, AcSS Distinguished Professor of Discourse Studies EXTENDED CURRICULUM VITAE BIO-DATA, CONTACT DETAILS, EDUCATION ............................................................................................ 2 CAREER .................................................................................................................................................... 3 VISITING PROFESSORSHIPS...................................................................................................................... 4 AWARDS .................................................................................................................................................. 5 MAJOR RESEARCH GRANTS ..................................................................................................................... 5 KEY RESEARCH INTERESTS ....................................................................................................................... 6 OTHER PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES .......................................................................................................... 7 JOURNAL EDITORSHIP ............................................................................................................................. 8 BOOK SERIES EDITORSHIP ....................................................................................................................... 9 MEMBERSHIP IN JOURNAL ADVISORY BOARDS ...................................................................................... 9 MEMBERSHIP IN BOOK
[Show full text]
1 Metaphor, Genre and Recontextualization Elena Semino
1 Metaphor, genre and recontextualization Elena Semino (Lancaster University), Alice Deignan (The University of Leeds) and Jeannette Littlemore (The University of Birmingham) ABSTRACT Earlier studies have demonstrated the dynamic properties of metaphor by showing how the meanings and functions of metaphorical expressions can flexibly change and develop within individual texts or discourse events (Cameron 2011). In this paper, we draw from Linell’s (2009) typology of ‘recontextualization’ in order to analyze the development of particular metaphors in three pairs of linked texts, each produced over a number of years, on the topics of medicine, politics and the parenting of children with special needs. We show how key metaphorical expressions from earlier texts or conversations are re-used by later writers, in different genres and registers, to convey new meanings and serve new functions. We account for these new meanings and functions by considering the relevant domain of activity and the differences between the original context of use and the context(s) in which the metaphor is re-used. Our study contributes, from a diachronic perspective, to the growing body of literature that recognizes the dynamic and context-bound nature of metaphorical language. Earlier studies have identified and discussed the dynamic properties of metaphor within individual texts and conversations. In particular, Cameron and other scholars have argued that the meanings of metaphorical expressions are inherently flexible, and emerge in different ways in different contexts of use. As a result, the same metaphorical expressions are sometimes re-used within the same text or discourse event with different meanings and functions (Cameron and Low 2004, Cameron and Gibbs 2008, Cameron 2011).
[Show full text]
Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology
EDITED BY 00_Wodak_Meyer_3E_Prelims.indd 3 9/24/2015 11:56:08 AM 1 CRITICAL DISCOURSE STUDIES: HISTORY, AGENDA, THEORY AND METHODOLOGY RUTH WODAK AND MICHAEL MEYER CONTENTS CDS – What is it all about? 2 A brief history of ‘the Group’ 4 The common ground: discourse, critique, power and ideology 5 The notion of discourse 5 The critical impetus 6 Ideology and power – a kaleidoscopic view 8 Research agenda and challenges 12 Methodological issues: theory, methods, analysis, interpretation 13 Theoretical grounding and objectives 16 Major approaches to CDS 17 Data collection 21 Summary 21 01_Wodak_Meyer_3E_Ch_01.indd 1 9/24/2015 11:56:11 AM METHODS OF CRITICAL DISCOURSE STUDIES Keywords ideology, power, discourse, critique, methodology, levels of theory, approaches to critical discourse studies CDS – What is it all about? The manifold roots of critical discourse studies lie in rhetoric, text linguistics, anthropology, philosophy, social psychology, cognitive science, literary studies and sociolinguistics, as well as in applied linguistics and pragmatics. Teun van Dijk (2008) provides a broad overview of the field of discourse studies and iden- tifies the following developments: between the mid-1960s and the early 1970s, new, closely related disciplines emerged in the humanities and the social sciences. Despite their different disciplinary backgrounds and a great diversity of methods and objects of investigation, some parts of the new fields/para- digms/linguistic subdisciplines of semiotics, pragmatics, psycho- and sociolinguistics, ethnography of speaking, conversation analysis and discourse studies all dealt and continue to deal with discourse and have at least seven dimensions in common (see also Angermuller et al. 2014): •• An interest in the properties of ‘naturally occurring’ language use by real lan- guage users (instead of a study of abstract language systems and invented examples).
[Show full text]
A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Pro-Eating Disorder Blogs
Jezikoslovlje 12.2 (2011): 187-209 187 UDC 811.111'42:004.773=111 Original scientific paper Received on 15.08. 2011 Accepted for publication on 09.11. 2011 Morana Luka University of Zadar Down to the bone: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of pro-eating disorder blogs The pro-eating-disorder community is almost exclusively an online community of individuals who claim that eating disorders are not an illness, but rather a life- style choice. This study offers an insight into the ideologies constructed in the pro-eating-disorder online discourse by using micro and macro levels of critical discourse analysis (CDA) on 19 blogs written by the self-declared members of the community. Linguistic analysis of the pro-eating-disorder discourse has been largely under-represented and this study is the first to use a corpus-linguistics ap- proach to CDA in analysing the websites’ content. The results of the analysis show that the pro-eating-disorder community constructs the ideology of eating disorders as a life-style via demedicalised reference to the illness. The study also elaborates on the construction of the negative image of “an outsider” (any person not belonging to the community) as an element of self-determination. By using the corpus linguistic technique of keyness, main topics of the discourse are identi- fied, suggesting relevant relations between the discourse of measuring and will power and the underlying pro-eating-disorder ideologies. Key words: blog; pro-eating disorder community; critical discourse analysis; demedicalisation; corpus linguistics Morana Luka: 188 A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of pro-eating disorder blogs Woe’s me, woe’s me! The earth bears grain, But I Am unfruitful, Am discarded shell, Cracked, unusable, Worthless husk.
[Show full text]
Aurora Tsai's Review of the Diagnosis of Reading in a Second Or Foreign
Reading in a Foreign Language April 2015, Volume 27, No. 1 ISSN 1539-0578 pp. 117–121 Reviewed work: The Diagnosis of Reading in a Second or Foreign Language. (2015). Alderson, C., Haapakangas, E., Huhta, A., Nieminen, L., & Ullakonoja, R. New York and London: Routledge. Pp. 265. ISBN 978-0-415-66290-1 (paperback). $49.95 Reviewed by Aurora Tsai Carnegie Mellon University United States http://www.amazon.com In The Diagnosis of Reading in a Second or Foreign Language, Charles Alderson, Eeva-Leena Haapakangas, Ari Huhta, Lea Nieminen, and Riikka Ullakonoja discuss prominent theories concerning the diagnosis of reading in a second or foreign language (SFL). Until now, the area of diagnosis in SFL reading has received little attention, despite its increasing importance as the number of second language learners continues to grow across the world. As the authors point out, researchers have not yet established a theory of how SFL diagnosis works, which makes it difficult to establish reliable procedures for accurately diagnosing and helping students in need. In this important contribution to reading and diagnostic research, Alderson et al. illustrate the challenges involved in carrying out diagnostic procedures, conceptualize a theory of diagnosis, provide an overview of SFL reading, and highlight important factors to consider in diagnostic assessment. Moreover, they provide detailed examples of tests developed specifically for diagnosis, most of which arise from their most current research projects. Because this book covers a wide variety of SFL reading and diagnostic topics, researchers in applied linguistics, second language acquisition, language assessment, education, and even governmental organizations or military departments would consider it an enormously helpful and enlightening resource on SFL reading.
[Show full text]
Input, Interaction, and Second Language Development
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Lancaster E-Prints SSLA, 21, 557±587. Printed in the United States of America. INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL Alison Mackey Georgetown University This study examines the relationship between different types of con- versational interaction and SLA. Long's (1996) updated version of the interactionist hypothesis claims that implicit negative feedback, which can be obtained through negotiated interaction, facilitates SLA. Similar claims for the benefits of negotiation have been made by Pica (1994) and Gass (1997). Some support for the interaction hypothesis has been provided by studies that have explored the effects of interaction on production (Gass & Varonis, 1994), on lexical acquisition (Ellis, Tanaka, & Yamazaki, 1994), on the short-term outcomes of pushed output (see Swain, 1995), and for specific interactional features such as recasts (Long, Inagaki, & Ortega, 1998; Mackey & Philp, 1998). However, other studies have not found effects for interaction on gram- matical development (Loschky, 1994). The central question ad- dressed by the current study was: Can conversational interaction facilitate second language development? The study employed a pre- test-posttest design. Adult ESL learners (N = 34) of varying L1 back- grounds were divided into four experimental groups and one control I am grateful to Susan M. Gass and Charlene Polio for insightful suggestions and help with this paper. I also want to thank Patsy Lightbown, Michael H. Long, Teresa Pica, and Merrill Swain for many helpful comments on the doctoral dissertation from which this paper arose. I am much indebted to Ian Thornton for assistance with the statistical analysis and discussions of many of the issues in- volved in this study.
[Show full text]