Arxiv:1211.7090V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 29 Nov 2012

Galactic Searches for Dark Matter Louis E. Strigari Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA Abstract For nearly a century, more mass has been measured in galaxies than is contained in the luminous stars and gas. Through continual advances in observations and theory, it has become clear that the dark matter in galaxies is not comprised of known astronomical objects or baryonic matter, and that identification of it is certain to reveal a profound connection between astrophysics, cosmology, and fundamental physics. The best explanation for dark matter is that it is in the form of a yet undiscovered particle of nature, with experiments now gaining sensitivity to the most well-motivated particle dark matter candidates. In this article, I review measurements of dark matter in the Milky Way and its satellite galaxies and the status of Galactic searches for particle dark matter using a combination of terrestrial and space-based astroparticle detectors, and large scale astronomical surveys. I review the limits on the dark matter annihilation and scattering cross sections that can be extracted from both astroparticle experiments and astronomical observations, and explore the theoretical implications of these limits. I discuss methods to measure the properties of particle dark matter using future experiments, and conclude by highlighting the exciting potential for dark matter searches during the next decade, and beyond. arXiv:1211.7090v1 [astro-ph.CO] 29 Nov 2012 Preprint submitted to Physics Reports December 3, 2012 Contents 1 Dark Matter Searches: Historical Context 4 1.1 Establishment of dark matter . 4 1.2 MACHOs: Review of searches and results . 5 1.3 WIMPs: Theoretical motivation and initial search results . 6 1.4 Modern perspective on dark matter searches . 8 1.4.1 Astroparticle and collider searches . 8 1.4.2 Astrophysical searches . 9 2 Scope of this article 12 3 Dark matter in the Milky Way 13 3.1 Dark matter in the Galactic center . 13 3.2 Local dark matter in the Solar neighborhood . 15 3.3 The mass of the Milky Way . 19 3.4 Shape of the Milky Way halo . 26 4 Dark matter in Milky Way satellite galaxies 30 4.1 Theoretical modeling . 32 4.2 Classical satellites . 36 4.3 Ultra-faint satellites . 38 4.4 Core versus cusp issue . 41 4.5 Streams and disrupted satellites . 45 5 Simulations of Galactic halos: Predictions and observational connections 48 5.1 Simulations of Milky Way-like galaxies . 48 5.2 Mass distribution . 49 5.3 Velocity distribution . 51 5.4 Galactic substructure . 54 5.4.1 Connection to Galactic satellites . 55 5.5 The mass of the Milky Way . 60 5.6 Caustics . 60 6 Indirect Detection: Theoretical Developments 61 6.1 Dark matter annihilation . 61 6.2 Annihilation cross section models . 64 6.3 Photon and charged particle production . 66 6.4 Dark matter decay . 67 6.5 Neutrinos . 67 7 Indirect Detection: Experimental Results 70 7.1 Overview of gamma-ray experiments: Fermi-LAT and ACTs . 71 7.2 Galactic center . 72 7.3 Dwarf spheroidals . 75 7.4 Diffuse Galactic and extragalactic searches . 81 7.5 Galactic substructure . 82 7.6 Galaxy clusters . 84 7.7 Summary of gamma-ray results . 86 2 7.8 Neutrino searches . 87 7.9 Antimatter searches . 88 7.10 Decaying dark matter and X-ray searches . 88 7.11 Summary of results and interpretations . 89 8 Direct Detection: Theoretical Developments 90 8.1 WIMP detection methods . 90 8.2 Scattering cross section models . 92 8.3 Dependence on local dark matter density . 94 8.4 Dependence on the velocity distribution . 94 8.5 Determining WIMP properties . 96 9 Direct Detection: Experimental Results 101 9.1 Spin-independent limits . 101 9.2 Spin-dependent limits . 104 9.2.1 Direct detection . 105 9.2.2 Neutrinos . 106 9.3 Directional searches . 107 9.4 Summary of experimental results and interpretations . 107 10 Future Directions and Complementarity with Other Searches 109 10.1 Direct detection . 109 10.2 Indirect detection . 110 10.3 Complementarity with initial LHC searches . 112 10.4 Cosmological searches . 113 10.5 Astronomical observations . 113 11 Summary 116 12 Acknowledgements 116 3 1. Dark Matter Searches: Historical Context 1.1. Establishment of dark matter When it first became possible to measure the motions of stars in the Milky Way, its structure and dynamics was revealed to a level not previously possible. On examination of the brightest stars in the disk of the Milky Way, Oort found that the stars were only able to account for about one-third of the total mass contained within the disk (Oort, 1932). Oort deduced that the disk contained two-thirds \dark matter" that was predominantly in the form of stars less luminous than the Sun, as well as gas and dust in the interstellar medium. Nearly thirty years later, Kinman (1959) analyzed the velocities of Milky Way globular clusters, and deduced possible deviations from a pure bulge and disk mass model of the Galaxy, known at the time as \Schmidt's Law." Though there were large error bars associated with his measurements, the data was consistent with a linearly rising mass distribution beyond the disk. Kinman suggested that the data be held in reserve due to uncertainties in the globular cluster distances and the local circular velocity. Babcock (1939) was the first to measure the mass distribution of M31, the nearest galaxy with luminosity comparable to the Milky Way. From the measurement of radial velocities in the optical emission line region extending out to approximately 20 kpc from the center of M31, Babcock determined that the total mass-to-light ratio increases in the outer regions. He suggested that absorption of light was the cause of this increasing mass-to-light ratio. Two decades later, Kahn and Woltjer (1959) were the first to connect the dynamics of local galaxies to the universe on larger scales. These authors noted that if the Milky Way and M31 were once receeding due to Hubble expansion, and are now approaching at the observed velocity, there must be ten times more unseen material within both of the galaxies and within the inter-galactic medium to reverse their initial separation. They made the suggestion that this material was in the form of intergalactic gas and dust. The results on the mass distribution of M31 were further corroborated by the 21-cm observations of van de Hulst et al. (1957) and Roberts and Whitehurst (1975), which clearly indicated that the rotation curve of this galaxy is flat out to approximately 35 kpc from the center, and did not fall-off in the Keplerian fashion as expected if the stars and gas dominated the gravitational dynamics. Flat rotation curves were identified in larger samples of nearby spiral galaxies through a variety of techniques at several observatories (Bosma, 1978; Rubin et al., 1980). After several years of dealing with systematics, such as the effect of beam smearing, it became the widespread consensus amongst astronomers that the results were not due to observational limitations, and that rotation curves of many spiral galaxies remained flat in the outermost regions (Sofue and Rubin, 2001). The seemingly linear rise in the mass distribution of the Milky Way beyond the disk, combined with the measured rotation curves of M31 and nearby spiral galaxies, provided a fresh perspective on well-known observations obtained from larger and more distant systems. About a year after Oort published his results on the kinematics of the stars in the Milky Way, Fritz Zwicky famously deduced that there was hundreds of times more mass in the Coma cluster of galaxies than was contained within the luminous galaxies (Zwicky, 1933). Zwicky considered a few explanations for his data: the constituent galaxies contained much more mass than he ascribed to them, there was undetected intergalactic matter, or perhaps even the known physical laws were not appropriate for the mega-parsec scales he was considering. Upon noting that the cluster may be dominated by \dark matter," Zwicky both used Oort's phrase for the first time in the context of extragalactic astronomy, and also in a manner that most closely resembles its meaning in the modern scientific vernacular. As incontrovertible evidence built indicating that galaxies and clusters of galaxies require much more mass that is contained in the luminous material, the question became eminently focused: 4 What is the nature of the dark matter that dominates the mass of astronomical systems? While there has been, and continues to be, a variety of theoretical of explanations to this question, two particularly compelling explanations have lent themselves to rigorous investigation. On the one hand there is the plausible conjecture, entertained by many of the aforementioned astronomers, that our inventory of astronomical bodies is incomplete, in particular we do not have a good census of bodies that are faint sources of radiation that escape detection. On the other hand, a theoretical picture has been developed that predicts that dark matter is a new elementary particle that is distinct from the known particles of nature. In order to set the stage for the results that are presented in this article, it is informative to review the historical establishment of these two classes of dark matter candidates, the predictions that they make, and the searches for signatures of them. 1.2. MACHOs: Review of searches and results We do not have a complete understanding of the population of low mass stars, stellar remnants, and planetary mass bodies in the Galaxy. Compact astronomical bodies that constitute a significant component of the mass of the Galaxy are historically referred to as Massive Astrophysical Compact Halo Objects (MACHOs).

Load more