Joseph John Thomson Jeremy Plett

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Joseph John Thomson Jeremy Plett Born: December 18, 1856 in Cheetham, England (near Manchester) Died: August 30, 1940 Joseph John Thomson was the son of a bookseller and began his college career at Owens College in Manchester at the age of fourteen. Strangely, Thomson’s father had intended that JJ study to become an engineer but this was too expensive for the family. Two years later, when Thomson was only sixteen, his father died. Shortly after this event, Thomson received a scholarship at Cambridge University’s prestigious Trinity College. It was here that Thomson would spend the rest of his life. Thomson was a gifted mathematician and got a bachelor’s degree in mathematics in 1880. In 1884, Thomson was given the opportunity to do experimental research and teach at the Cavendish Laboratory. Thomson closely monitored his students and their progress and he was a very helpful instructor as well as a great teacher. Thomson must have particularly aided one female student named Rose Paget, who became his wife in 1890. J.J. and Rose had two children, one of whom, Sir George Paget Thomson, became a distinguished physicist himself, winning the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1937. George Thomson’s prize came as a result of his co discovery of the diffraction of electrons by crystals. In addition to his scientific interest, J.J. Thomson loved athletics and never missed a chance to see the local cricket and rugby matches. Thomson is sometimes remembered as the “father of the electron.” He is credited with the discovery that all matter contains particles much smaller than atoms and that these particles are of the same type. We now call these particles electrons. This discovery was made while Thomson was working with cathode rays. Thomson was trying to learn the nature of these mysterious rays, which was widely speculated upon but not known. Thomson performed three major experiments in 1897 which led to his grand discovery. For the first experiment, Thomson built a cathode ray tube and used a magnet to bend the rays. In this experiment, Thomson sought to determine whether or not the charge that the rays were known to possess could be separated from the rays. Thomson found that when the rays were bent through the slit and allowed access to the electrometer it measured a large negative charge. When the rays were bent so that they missed the slit and when the rays were not bent at all the electrometer measured a small charge. Thomson reasoned that the charge could not be removed from cathode rays. Thomson knew that a negatively charged ray should bend in both magnetic and electric fields. In a magnetic field, the rays were observed to bend as expected. In electric fields, however, physicists could not get the cathode ray to bend. Thomson was also aware that charges do not bend in an electric field if they are surrounded by a conductor. He figured that the gas had not been completely removed from the cathode ray tube. The remaining gas could then be blamed for the current problem. If the remaining gas, which surrounded the cathode ray, could conduct electricity, then it could act as a shield and prevent the deflection of the cathode ray. To test this, Thomson went to great lengths to remove as much gas from the tube as possible before experimenting. After this was done, the rays were finally deflected by an electric field as they were supposed to be. After these two experiments, Thomson already figured he was dealing with beams of particles rather then “mysterious rays.” Said Thomson, “I can see no escape from the conclusion that [cathode rays] are charges of negative electricity carried by particles of matter, but what are these particles? Are they atoms? Are they molecules, or perhaps some smaller form of matter?” In Thomson’s third experiment, he sought to find some of the properties of these particles. Although he was unable to measure the charge or mass of an individual particle, he was able to measure how much the beam bent in a magnetic field and how much energy the beams carried. In this process, he was able to calculate a ratio of mass to charge. What Thomson found was not what he expected. The ratio of mass to charge was greater than one thousand times smaller than that of a charged hydrogen atom. Thomson concluded that the particles that make up a cathode ray must be extremely light or heavily charged. Thomson’s discovery was great, but his idea that corpuscles (electrons) may form all matter has since been found to be incorrect. Although we now know that there are other subatomic particles, Thomson was right in saying that electrons are a fundamental part of every atom. His “Plum Pudding” model was the first legitimate attempt at an atomic model and was improved upon in the following years. Because of his discovery of the electron, J.J. Thomson became a very celebrated physicist. He was awarded the Nobel Prize for physics in 1906 and in 1908 he was knighted. In 1909 he was made president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science and attended a conference in Winnipeg, Manitoba with this title attached to his name. Thomson is remembered as a great teacher as well and seven of his students went on to win Nobel Prizes of their own. Because of this, it is clear that Thomson’s value to scientific development goes far beyond the discovery that he is most famous for. J.J. Thomson entered the world of physics at just the right time. Before him came much research into the fields of electricity, magnetism, and thermodynamics, which set the stage for much further discovery. Physics, however, was thought to be a dying science and many believed everything important had already been discovered. Thomson, along with several others, put an end to this thought and set the science of physics on a course for fantastic advancement over the following decades and, indeed, the following century as well. Sir J.J. Thomson wrote a number of books including A Text Book of Physics- Properties, which was published in 1909 and Elements of the Mathematical Theory of Electricity and Magnetism, which was published in 1919. A library at Cambridge University still has 6 boxes full of papers that he wrote. For those interested, further research on Thomson and the discovery of the electron can be done even on the University of Manitoba campus. Also, page 70 in Quantum Theory has a few words about Thomson and the discovery of the electron. Bibliography Numbers 1 to 3 are excellent resources and have much information on the life and work of Sir J.J. Thomson. 1) http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Lane/6341/JJ.html 2) http://www.scs.k12.tn.us/STT99_WQ/STT99/Bartlett_HS/stephensonp/Trish/thomson.htm 3) http://www.britannica.com/nobel/micro/591_84.html 4) http://web.lemoyne.edu/~giunta/jthomson.html (Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech) 5) http://www.chemheritage.org/EducationalServices/chemach/ans/jjt.html (Best Portrait) 6) http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/101/atoms/slides/sld008.htm (Plum Pudding Model) 7) http://www.sci.tamucc.edu/pals/morvant/genchem/atomic/page6.htm (Plum Pudding Model) 8)http://library.trin.cam.ac.uk/search/aThomson%2C+J./athomson+j/1%2C20%2C59%2CB/exact&FF=atho mson+j+j+sir+joseph+john+1856-1940&1%2C29%2C (publications) 9) http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1906/thomson-lecture.html (Real Nobel Prize Lecture) .
Recommended publications
  • Von Richthofen, Einstein and the AGA Estimating Achievement from Fame

    Von Richthofen, Einstein and the AGA Estimating Achievement from Fame

    Von Richthofen, Einstein and the AGA Estimating achievement from fame Every schoolboy has heard of Einstein; fewer have heard of Antoine Becquerel; almost nobody has heard of Nils Dalén. Yet they all won Nobel Prizes for Physics. Can we gauge a scientist’s achievements by his or her fame? If so, how? And how do fighter pilots help? Mikhail Simkin and Vwani Roychowdhury look for the linkages. “It was a famous victory.” We instinctively rank the had published. However, in 2001–2002 popular French achievements of great men and women by how famous TV presenters Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff published they are. But is instinct enough? And how exactly does a great man’s fame relate to the greatness of his achieve- ment? Some achievements are easy to quantify. Such is the case with fighter pilots of the First World War. Their achievements can be easily measured and ranked, in terms of their victories – the number of enemy planes they shot down. These aces achieved varying degrees of fame, which have lasted down to the internet age. A few years ago we compared1 the fame of First World War fighter pilot aces (measured in Google hits) with their achievement (measured in victories); and we found that We can estimate fame grows exponentially with achievement. fame from Google; Is the same true in other areas of excellence? Bagrow et al. have studied the relationship between can this tell us 2 achievement and fame for physicists . The relationship Manfred von Richthofen (in cockpit) with members of his so- about actual they found was linear.
  • A Brief History of Nuclear Astrophysics

    A Brief History of Nuclear Astrophysics

    A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ASTROPHYSICS PART I THE ENERGY OF THE SUN AND STARS Nikos Prantzos Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris Stellar Origin of Energy the Elements Nuclear Astrophysics Astronomy Nuclear Physics Thermodynamics: the energy of the Sun and the age of the Earth 1847 : Robert Julius von Mayer Sun heated by fall of meteors 1854 : Hermann von Helmholtz Gravitational energy of Kant’s contracting protosolar nebula of gas and dust turns into kinetic energy Timescale ~ EGrav/LSun ~ 30 My 1850s : William Thompson (Lord Kelvin) Sun heated at formation from meteorite fall, now « an incadescent liquid mass » cooling Age 10 – 100 My 1859: Charles Darwin Origin of species : Rate of erosion of the Weald valley is 1 inch/century or 22 miles wild (X 1100 feet high) in 300 My Such large Earth ages also required by geologists, like Charles Lyell A gaseous, contracting and heating Sun 푀⊙ Mean solar density : ~1.35 g/cc Sun liquid Incompressible = 4 3 푅 3 ⊙ 1870s: J. Homer Lane ; 1880s :August Ritter : Sun gaseous Compressible As it shrinks, it releases gravitational energy AND it gets hotter Earth Mayer – Kelvin - Helmholtz Helmholtz - Ritter A gaseous, contracting and heating Sun 푀⊙ Mean solar density : ~1.35 g/cc Sun liquid Incompressible = 4 3 푅 3 ⊙ 1870s: J. Homer Lane ; 1880s :August Ritter : Sun gaseous Compressible As it shrinks, it releases gravitational energy AND it gets hotter Earth Mayer – Kelvin - Helmholtz Helmholtz - Ritter A gaseous, contracting and heating Sun 푀⊙ Mean solar density : ~1.35 g/cc Sun liquid Incompressible = 4 3 푅 3 ⊙ 1870s: J.
  • Nobel Prizes Social Network

    Nobel Prizes Social Network

    Nobel prizes social network Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Nobel prizes social network Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Nobel prizes social network Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Irène Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) Nobel prizes social network Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Irène Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) = Frédéric Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) Nobel prizes social network Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Paul Langevin Irène Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) = Frédéric Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) Nobel prizes social network Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Paul Langevin Maurice de Broglie Louis de Broglie (Phys.1929) Irène Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) = Frédéric Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) Nobel prizes social network Sir J. J. Thomson (Phys.1906) Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Paul Langevin Maurice de Broglie Louis de Broglie (Phys.1929) Irène Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) = Frédéric Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) Nobel prizes social network (more) Sir J. J. Thomson (Phys.1906) Nobel prizes social network (more) Sir J. J. Thomson (Phys.1906) Owen Richardson (Phys.1928) Nobel prizes social network (more) Sir J. J. Thomson (Phys.1906) Owen Richardson (Phys.1928) Clinton Davisson (Phys.1937) Nobel prizes social network (more) Sir J. J. Thomson (Phys.1906) Owen Richardson (Phys.1928) Charlotte Richardson = Clinton Davisson (Phys.1937) Nobel prizes social network (more) Sir J.
  • Marischal College

    Marischal College

    The Scientific Tourist: Aberdeen Marischal College George P Thomson – Nobel Prize winning physicist Sir George Paget Thomson FRS (1892-1975) was the only son of Sir J. J. Thomson, the Cavendish Professor of Physics who is probably most famous for discovering the existence of the electron and measuring its mass. G. P. Thomson was one of a select group of academics in the University of Aberdeen to be awarded the Nobel Prize. He earned it for his work in the Department of Natural Philosophy at Marischal College during his tenure from 1922-1930. There is now a commemorative plaque in the Marischal College quadrangle. Thomson was a high achieving Trinity College, Cambridge, scholar who graduated in 1913 and was elected Fellow and Lecturer at Corpus Christi College in the following year. He was, though, of the generation whose adult lives were to be shaped by two World Wars and their aftermaths. Thomson spent most of the First World War in France and in the research wing of the Royal Flying Corps. His first book1 came out of this experience and is simply entitled “Applied Aerodynamics”. It is a well-illustrated summary of the lessons of wartime work on the science of aircraft design and operation, underlining the basic physics involved. Upon Thomson’s return to Cambridge he took up research into his father’s long-standing interest of electrical discharges in gases. He brought this interest with him when he came to Aberdeen in 1922 and did much of the work enlarging J. J. Thomson’s “Conduction of Electricity through Gases” into a long awaited 3rd edition that was published in their joint names in 1928.
  • Physics 1928 OWEN WILLANS RICHARDSON

    Physics 1928 OWEN WILLANS RICHARDSON

    Physics 1928 OWEN WILLANS RICHARDSON <<for his work on the thermionic phenomenon and especially-for the discovery of the law named after him>> Physics 1928 Presentation Speech by Professor C. W. Oseen, Chairman of the Nobel Committee for Physics of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Your Majesty, Your Royal Highnesses, Ladies and Gentlemen. Among the great problems that scientists conducting research in electro- technique are today trying to solve, is that of enabling two men to converse in whatever part of the world each may be. In 1928 things had reached the stage when we could begin to establish telephonic communication between Sweden and North America. On that occasion there was a telephone line of more than 22,000 kilometres in length between Stockholm and New York. From Stockholm, speech was transmitted via Berlin to England by means of a cable and overhead lines; from England by means of wireless to New York; then, via a cable and lines by land, over to Los Angeles and back to New York, and from there by means of a new line to Chicago, returning finally to New York. In spite of the great distance, the words could be heard distinctly and this is explained by the fact that there were no fewer than 166 amplifiers along the line. The principle of construction of an amplifier is very simple. A glowing filament sends out a stream of electrons. When the speech waves reach the amplifier, they oscillate in tune with the sound waves but are weakened. The speech waves are now made to put the stream of electrons in the same state of oscillation as they have themselves.
  • Electron Microscopy

    Electron Microscopy

    Electron microscopy 1 Plan 1. De Broglie electron wavelength. 2. Davisson – Germer experiment. 3. Wave-particle dualism. Tonomura experiment. 4. Wave: period, wavelength, mathematical description. 5. Plane, cylindrical, spherical waves. 6. Huygens-Fresnel principle. 7. Scattering: light, X-rays, electrons. 8. Electron scattering. Born approximation. 9. Electron-matter interaction, transmission function. 10. Weak phase object (WPO) approximation. 11. Electron scattering. Elastic and inelastic scattering 12. Electron scattering. Kinematic and dynamic diffraction. 13. Imaging phase objects, under focus, over focus. Transport of intensity equation. 2 Electrons are particles and waves 3 De Broglie wavelength PhD Thesis, 1924: “With every particle of matter with mass m and velocity v a real wave must be associated” h p 2 h mv p mv Ekin eU 2 2meU Louis de Broglie (1892 - 1987) – wavelength h – Planck constant hc eU – electron energy in eV eU eU2 m c2 eU m0 – electron rest mass 0 c – speed of light The Nobel Prize in Physics 1929 was awarded to Prince Louis-Victor Pierre Raymond de Broglie "for his discovery of the wave nature of electrons." 4 De Broigle “Recherches sur la Théorie des Quanta (Researches on the quantum theory)” (1924) Electron wavelength 142 pm 80 keV – 300 keV 5 Davisson – Germer experiment (1923 – 1929) The first direct evidence confirming de Broglie's hypothesis that particles can have wave properties as well 6 C. Davisson, L. H. Germer, "The Scattering of Electrons by a Single Crystal of Nickel" Nature 119(2998), 558 (1927) Davisson – Germer experiment (1923 – 1929) The first direct evidence confirming de Broglie's hypothesis that particles can have wave properties as well Clinton Joseph Davisson (left) and Lester Germer (right) George Paget Thomson Nobel Prize in Physics 1937: Davisson and Thomson 7 C.
  • (Owen Willans) Richardson

    (Owen Willans) Richardson

    O. W. (Owen Willans) Richardson: An Inventory of His Papers at the Harry Ransom Center Descriptive Summary Creator: Richardson, O. W. (Owen Willans), 1879-1959 Title: O. W. (Owen Willans) Richardson Papers Dates: 1898-1958 (bulk 1920-1940) Extent: 112 document boxes, 2 oversize boxes (49.04 linear feet), 1 oversize folder (osf), 5 galley folders (gf) Abstract: The papers of Sir O. W. (Owen Willans) Richardson, the Nobel Prize-winning British physicist who pioneered the field of thermionics, contain research materials and drafts of his writings, correspondence, as well as letters and writings from numerous distinguished fellow scientists. Call Number: MS-3522 Language: Primarily English; some works and correspondence written in French, German, or Italian . Note: The Ransom Center gratefully acknowledges the assistance of the Center for History of Physics, American Institute of Physics, which provided funds to support the processing and cataloging of this collection. Access: Open for research Administrative Information Additional The Richardson Papers were microfilmed and are available on 76 Physical Format reels. Each item has a unique identifying number (W-xxxx, L-xxxx, Available: R-xxxx, or M-xxxx) that corresponds to the microfilm. This number was recorded on the file folders housing the papers and can also be found on catalog slips present with each item. Acquisition: Purchase, 1961 (R43, R44) and Gift, 2005 Processed by: Tessa Klink and Joan Sibley, 2014 Repository: The University of Texas at Austin, Harry Ransom Center Richardson, O. W. (Owen Willans), 1879-1959 MS-3522 2 Richardson, O. W. (Owen Willans), 1879-1959 MS-3522 Biographical Sketch The English physicist Owen Willans Richardson, who pioneered the field of thermionics, was also known for his work on photoelectricity, spectroscopy, ultraviolet and X-ray radiation, the electron theory, and quantum theory.
  • 1 Electron Diffraction Chez Thomson. Early Responses to Quantum

    1 Electron Diffraction Chez Thomson. Early Responses to Quantum

    Electron diffraction chez Thomson. Early responses to quantum physics in Britain. Jaume Navarro Abstract In 1927, George Paget Thomson, professor at the University of Aberdeen, obtained photographs that he interpreted as evidence for electron diffraction. These photographs were in total agreement with de Broglie’s principle of wave-particle duality, a basic tenet of the new quatum wave mechanics. His experiments were an initially unforeseen spin-off from a project he had started in Cambridge with his father, Joseph John Thomson, on the study of positive rays. This paper addresses the scientific relationship between the Thomsons, father and son, as well as the influence that the institutional milieu of Cambridge had on the early work of the latter. Both Thomsons were trained in the pedagogical tradition of classical physics in the Cambridge Mathematical Tripos, and this certainly influenced their understanding of quantum physics and early quantum mechanics. In this paper, I analyse the responses of both father and son to the photographs of electron diffraction: a confirmation of the existence of the ether in the former, and a partial embrace of some ideas of the new quantum mechanics in the latter. Introduction 1 In the summer of 1922, a young Cambridge physicist applied for the recently vacated chair of Natural Philosophy at the University of Aberdeen. The testimonials he enclosed with the application letter, nine in total, all came from well-established scholars directly related to Cambridge.1 This comes to no surprise if we take into account that the applicant, George Paget Thomson (G.P.), had not only received all his academic training in that university, but had also been born in that town, son of one of the best- known British physicists of his time, and then Master of Trinity College, Joseph John Thomson (J.J.).
  • Lsu-Physics Iq Test 3 Strikes You're

    Lsu-Physics Iq Test 3 Strikes You're

    LSU-PHYSICS IQ TEST 3 STRIKES YOU'RE OUT For Physics Block Party on 9 September 2016: This was run where all ~70 people start answering each question, given out one-by-one. Every time a person missed an answer, they made a 'strike'. All was done with the Honor System for answers, plus a fairly liberal statement of what constitutes a correct answer. When the person accumulates three strikes, then they are out of the game. The game continue until only one person was left standing. Actually, there had to be one extra question to decide a tie-break between 2nd and 3rd place. The prizes were: FIRST PLACE: Ravi Rau, selecting an Isaac Newton 'action figure' SECOND PLACE: Juhan Frank, selecting an Albert Einstein action figure THIRD PLACE: Siddhartha Das, winning a Mr. Spock action figure. 1. What is Einstein's equation relating mass and energy? E=mc2 OK, I knew in advance that someone would blurt out the answer loudly, and this did happen. So this was a good question to make sure that the game flowed correctly. 2. What is the short name for the physics paradox depicted on the back of my Physics Department T-shirt? Schroedinger's Cat 3. Give the name of one person new to our Department. This could be staff, student, or professor. There are many answers, for example with the new profs being Tabatha Boyajian, Kristina Launey, Manos Chatzopoulos, and Robert Parks. Many of the people asked 'Can I just use myself?', with the answer being "Sure". 4. What Noble Gas is named after the home planet of Kal-El? Krypton.
  • Diffraction of Light Prelab by Dr

    Diffraction of Light Prelab by Dr

    Diffraction of Light Prelab by Dr. Christine P. Cheney, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 401 Nielsen Physics Building, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1200 © 2018 by Christine P. Cheney* *All rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the author. Read the introduction to Diffraction in your lab manual.1 Light is very interesting because it can behave as a wave or as a particle. You will observe both types of properties in the Diffraction of Light lab but will focus on the wave-like properties. (The particle-like properties come from the two light sources, a helium-neon laser and a mercury discharge lamp. The colors of light that these sources emit are discrete colors that have energy E=hn where E is the energy of the light, h is Planck’s constant, and n is the frequency of the light. Each photon of light has energy hn. This aspect of light is particle-like, and you will learn more about the particle-like behavior of light next week in the Photoelectric Effect lab.) Diffraction is used to study materials. The lattice spacing in crystalline materials is very small. For example the lattice spacing of a NaCl crystal is 5.64 Å.2 This small spacing can be used as a diffraction grating for x-rays. X-rays have a wavelength range of 0.01- 10 nm.
  • J. J. Thomson Goes to America

    J. J. Thomson Goes to America

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector ACCOUNT &PERSPECTIVE J. J. Thomson Goes to America Kevin M. Downard School of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Joseph John (J. J.) Thomson was an accomplished scientist who helped lay the foundations of nuclear physics. A humble man of working class roots, Thomson went on to become one of the most influential physicists of the late 19th century. He is credited with the discovery of the electron, received a Nobel Prize in physics in 1906 for investigations into the conduction of electricity by gases, was knighted in 1908, and served as a Cavendish Professor and Director of the laboratory for over 35 years from 1884. His laboratory attracted some of the world’s brightest minds; Francis W. Aston, Niels H. D. Bohr, Hugh L. Callendar, Charles T. R. Wilson, Ernest Rutherford, George F. C. Searle, Geoffrey I. Taylor, and John S. E. Townsend all worked under him. This article recounts J. J. Thomson’s visits to North America in 1896, 1903, 1909, and finally 1923. It presents his activities and his personal impressions of the people and society of the U.S.A. and Canada, and the science of atomic physics and chemistry in the late 1800s and early 1900s. (J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2009, 20, 1964–1973) © 2009 American Society for Mass Spectrometry oseph John (J. J.) Thomson was born in suburban his father’s footsteps and was appointed a Professor of Manchester in England on December 18, 1856 and Physics at Cambridge.
  • S.S. Bhatnagar, C.V. Raman, Homi Bhabha and Research in Physics at Lahore and Chandigarh

    S.S. Bhatnagar, C.V. Raman, Homi Bhabha and Research in Physics at Lahore and Chandigarh

    S.S. Bhatnagar, C.V. Raman, Homi Bhabha and Research in Physics at Lahore and Chandigarh Arun Kumar Grover* Department of Physics, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014 IPA D.A.E.–C V Raman Lecture, 2013-14 at P.U. Campus, Chandigarh August 7, 2013 (*on leave of absence from TIFR, Mumbai ) ABSTRACT • I shall present a personal perspective of initiation of research in Physical Sciences at the University of Punjab at Lahore, and then at the Panjab University, Chandigarh in the context of life and times of Nobel Laureate Sir C.V. Raman, FRS; Sir S.S. Bhatnagar, FRS and Dr. Homi Bhabha, FRS. • Dr. Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar was not only the first Professor of Physical Chemistry and the Founder Director of University Chemical Laboratories, the Dean University Instruction (DUI) at Punjab University and the Founder Director of CSIR, but also a part of an expedition team on Cosmic Ray Research at high altitudes led by Nobel Laureate A.H. Compton in 1926 on behalf of the University at Lahore. ABSTRACT • Dr. Homi Bhabha was motivated to commence Cosmic Ray Research while he was at sojourn at C.V. Raman’s Department of Physics at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore during a visit of Nobel Laureate Robert A. Millikan to perform Cosmic Ray explorations in India. • The CSIR had funded the initiation of research based on Nuclear Accelerators at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR),founded by Homi Bhabha in 1945. Close bonds have existed between the TIFR and the Department of Physics of Panjab University ever since the movement of Physics Honours School from Govt.