And Microscale Methods for Characterizing Cell Viability Julianne Forman Audiffred Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2009 Quantitative Macro- and Microscale Methods for Characterizing Cell Viability Julianne Forman Audiffred Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Engineering Science and Materials Commons Recommended Citation Audiffred, Julianne Forman, "Quantitative Macro- and Microscale Methods for Characterizing Cell Viability" (2009). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3813. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3813 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. QUANTITATIVE MACRO- AND MICROSCALE METHODS FOR CHARACTERIZING CELL VIABILITY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Interdepartmental Program in Engineering Science by Julianne Forman Audiffred B.S., Louisiana State University, 2002 M.S., Louisiana State University, 2005 December 2009 DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my husband, Bryan, and my son, Bennett Alexander ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I appreciate the guidance and support of my graduate committee, Dr. Richard Bengtson, Dr. Tryfon Charalampopoulos, Dr. Jin-Woo Choi, Dr. Marybeth Lima, Dr. Steven Soper, and Dr. Todd Monroe. I would especially like to thank my major advisor, Dr. Todd Monroe, for his guidance and continued support over the past few years. His patience helped to make this possible, and I have learned a great deal about professionalism and high-quality work ethics that I know will be invaluable for my future endeavors. Also, I owe much appreciation (and coffee) to Dr. Marybeth Lima for the many years of mentoring during my undergraduate and graduate school experience. I would also like to thank Dr. Daniel Thomas and the various people in the BAE Department who have assisted me. Financial assistance throughout my graduate work was provided by National Science Foundation (NSF Graduate Research Fellowship), Donald W. Clayton (Donald W. Clayton Assistantship), and Dr. Daniel Hayes (Research Associate position in affiliation with the LSU AgCenter). There are numerous other graduate and undergraduate students that have provided practical and moral help throughout this interdisciplinary project: Micah Fincher for the technical (testing and modeling) and hands-on assistance in the “art” of fabricating chips, as well as the enthusiasm and optimism when I needed it most; Jack Chiu for the soldering lessons and electronics support; and many other students in the Monroe Lab, including Michael Modica, Paige Brown, Sarah De Leo, Ammar Qureshi, Tyler Clement, Anna Dugas, Chad Jarreau, Rick Blidner, Nicholas Gerbo, Leah Mueller, and especially Carla Haslauer (a colleague who has provided a tremendous amount of support and advice as we have both pursued our doctoral degrees at the same time). Additionally, special thanks go to Marilyn Dietrich in the flow iii cytometry core at Veterinary Medicine for her help and use of the flow cytometer; Jason Guy for the many micromilled chips; Matt Hupert, Maggie Witek, and the CBMM community for hot- embossing and initial chip fabrication direction; and Mr. Tom McClure for machine shop expertise. Finally, I am grateful for my parents, sister, and friends who have supported me throughout my graduate school adventure. The last few months have required long hours and much encouragement, and I could not have completed this dissertation without Circe’s devoted companionship during the late-night writing, my husband’s unwavering support, and my son’s endearing smiles. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION................................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...........................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES......................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ x LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................................... xvii ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................. xix CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background on Cell Viability .............................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Necrosis and Apoptosis.............................................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Conventional Techniques to Measure Apoptosis ...................................................... 3 1.1.3 Limitations of Conventional Apoptosis Assays......................................................... 4 1.1.4 Significance and Therapeutic Importance ................................................................. 5 1.2. Recent Apoptotic Detection Studies Using Microfluidic Platforms................................... 6 1.2.1 Mitochondrial Membrane Potential ........................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Phosphatidylserine (PS) Translocation...................................................................... 9 1.2.3 DNA Fragmentation................................................................................................... 9 1.2.4 Caspase Activity ...................................................................................................... 12 1.2.5 Release of Cytochrome c ......................................................................................... 13 1.2.6 Intracellular Calcium (Ca2+) Detection.................................................................... 14 1.3 Electroanalytical Methods and Apoptosis.......................................................................... 15 1.3.1 Electrochemical Properties of Eukaryotic Biological Cells..................................... 16 1.3.2 Electrochemical Detection Methods........................................................................ 19 1.3.2.1 Impedance Spectroscopy and Micro Flow Cytometry................................ 19 1.3.2.2 Voltammetric Method and Apoptosis (Bulk Cell Measurements).............. 23 1.3.2.3 DEP and Apoptosis ..................................................................................... 24 1.4 Specific Aims..................................................................................................................... 27 1.4.1 Aim 1: Evaluate Flow-based Methods for Cell Viability Using Flow Cytometry .. 27 1.4.2 Aim 2: Determine Quantification of Cell-substrate Interactions and Cell Viability Using Light and Fluorescent Microscopy......................................................................... 27 1.4.3 Aim 3: Design a Microfluidic Device for Discrimination of Cell Viability Using Fluorescence and Electroanalytical Methods.................................................................... 28 1.5 References.......................................................................................................................... 28 CHAPTER 2. FLOW-BASED METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING CELL VIABILITY OF CELLS EXPOSED TO PALYMITOYL GOLD NANOPARTICLES AS CRYOPRESERVATIVE ..... 34 2.1 Introduction to Cryotherapeutic Procedures and Cell Studies ........................................... 34 2.2 Theoretical Background..................................................................................................... 38 2.3 Materials and Methods....................................................................................................... 40 2.3.1 Culture and Isolation of HeLa and Jurkat Cells....................................................... 40 v 2.3.2 DSC Experiments..................................................................................................... 42 2.3.3 Biophysical Parameter Estimation ................................................................. 42 2.3.4 Theoretical Prediction of Optimal Cooling Rates .......................................... 44 2.3.5 Freeze/Thaw Experiments.............................................................................. 44 2.3.6 Brightfield Phase-contrast Microscopy.......................................................... 45 2.3.7 Cell Viability and Apoptosis/Necrosis Assessment....................................... 46 2.3.8 Statistical Analysis................................................................................................... 47 2.4 Results................................................................................................................................ 47 2.4.1 Cell Geometry and Osmotically Inactive Cell Volume ........................................... 47 2.4.2 Freezing Response of HeLa Cells............................................................................ 48 2.4.3 Freezing Response of Jurkat Cells..........................................................................