ECE 333 – Systems

Lecture 16: PV Status and Issues

George Gross Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 1 OUTLINE

 PV solar system status

 PV technology benefits

 Key drivers of the PV system growth

 PV system installation costs

 Major challenges facing the PV solar resources

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 2 2013 WORLD STATUS OF THE PV SYSTEMS  The new capacity additions of 38.4 GW increased

the worldwide cumulative PV capacity to 138.9 GW

 Europe with 81.5 GW remains the world’s leading

region in terms of cumulative installed capacity –

about 59 % of the world’s total PV capacity and a

decrease from 70 % in 2012

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 3

2013 WORLD STATUS OF PV SYSTEMS  European markets for PV systems did not perform

well due to the reduction of solar incentives

 Outside Europe, markets for PV systems continued

to grow at a reasonable pace

 Asia became the leader in terms of new for PV

system installations for the first time

’s added installed capacity was highest with

11.9 GW, followed by Japan (6.9 GW) & USA (4.6 GW) ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 4 2013 WORLD CUMULATIVE PV CAPACITY

Rest of the World (10%) United Kingdom (2%)

India ( 2%) Greece (2%) Germany (26%) Czech Republic (2%) Belgium (2%) Australia (2%) France (3%) global PV capacity 138,856 MW Spain (4%)

China (13%) U.S. (9%) ://www.epia.org/news/publications/ http

Japan (10%) Italy (13%) Source: Source:

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 5 2008 – 2013 GLOBAL CUMULATIVE PV CAPACITY 138,856 140,000

120,000 100,504 100,000

80,000 70,469

60,000 40,336 40,000 23,185 20,000 15,844

0

Source: www.epia.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/EPIA_Global_Market_Outlook_for_Photovoltaics_2014-2018_-_Medium_Res.pdf ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 6 2008 – 2013 EUROPE CUMMULATIVE & ANNUAL INSTALLED PV CAPACITY

90,000 cumulative capacity 81,488 80,000 70,513 70,000

60,000 installed capacity 52,764 50,000 MW 40,000 30,505 30,000 22,259 17,749 20,000 16,854 13,651 11,020 10,975 10,000 5,708 5,834

0

Source: www.epia.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/EPIA_Global_Market_Outlook_for_Photovoltaics_2014-2018_-_Medium_Res.pdf ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 7 2003 – 2013 WORLDWIDE ELECTRICITY GENERATION FROM PV

140

120 30.7 100

80 up to 2008, annual 34.3

TWh 60 PV electricity generation increase is 28.3 40 less than 4.5 TWh 11.3 20 7.9

0

Source: www.epia.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/EPIA_Global_Market_Outlook_for_Photovoltaics_2014-2018_-_Medium_Res.pdf ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 8 2008 – 2013 PV ELECTRICITY GENERATION BY LEADING NATIONS

35 Germany 30 Italy

25 China 20

://www.bp.com/ 15 TWh Japan U.S. 10 Source: http Source:

5

0 1 2 3 4 5 2009 2011 2013

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 9 JUNE 2013 U.S. PV ENERGY/CAPACITY MAP

www.cleanpower.com/ Source: http:// Source:

monthly energy output() kWh

PV system capacity() kW p ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 10 DECEMBER 2013 US PV ENERGY/CAPACITY RATIO MAP

www.cleanpower.com/ Source: http:// Source:

monthly energy output() kWh

PV system capacity() kW p ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 11 2006 – 2013 EUROPEAN ELECTRICITY GENERATION FROM WIND AND PV 350 PV

300

250

200 TWh 150 wind

100 ://www.epia.org/news/publications/ http 50 Source: Source: 0

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 12 2013 ANNUAL EUROPE PV ENERGY/CAPACITY MAP

450

1,050 ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki Source: http Source:

1,650 MWh/MWp ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 13 THE 2013 STATUS OF US PV SYSTEMS

 US is a small, but growing, part of the global solar

capacity and energy

 The 2013 US cumulative PV capacity increased to

roughly 12.1 GW, with 4.6 GW of new PV capacity

added in 2013

 The 4.6 GW PV capacity installed in 2013 was over

10 times the 2009 amount of installed PV capacity

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 14 2006 – 2013 US CUMMULATIVE AND INSTALLED PV CAPACITY

14,000

12,060 12,000 cumulative capacity 10,000

8,000 installed capacity 7,460 MW 6,000

4,600 4,028 4,000 3,432

2,169 2,000 1,858 1,252 817 918 339 508 309 435 105 169 0

Source: http://www.irecusa.org// ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 15 2006 – 2013 US ANNUAL PV CAPACITY ADDITIONS

5000 4500 utility 4000 3500 3000 2500 MW 2000 commercial residential 1500 1000 500 0

Source: http://www.irecusa.org// ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 16 2013 US STATUS OF PV SYSTEMS BY STATES  More than three-quarters of the US PV capacity

installations were in CA, AZ and MA

 CA, AZ and NJ account for nearly two-thirds of the

cumulative PV capacity in the U.S.

 HI was among the top 10 states due to large

growth in distributed PV installations in 2013

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 17 U.S. TOP 10 STATES WITH LARGEST CUMULATIVE PV CAPACITY IN 2013

6,000

5,000

4,000

MW 3,000

2,000

1,000

0

Source: http://www.irecusa.org// ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 18 U.S. UTILITY-SCALE SOLAR PROJECTS

www.seia.org/map/majorprojectsmap.php : source

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 19 THE 5 LARGEST 2013 U.S. PV INSTALLATIONS capacity electricity plant location year built owner ( MW ) purchaser

Topaz Solar San Luis 500* 2013 Mid American Solar PG&E Farm Obispo, CA

Desert Sunlight Riverside PG&E & 490 2013 NextEra, Sumitomo Solar Farm County, CA SCE

NRG Energy; Agua Caliente Yuma, AZ 397 2014 PG&E MidAmerican Solar

California Valley San Luis, CA 292 2012-13 NRG Energy PG&E Solar Ranch

Sempra U.S. Gas & Mesquite Solar 1 Arlington, AZ 207 2011-2012 PG&E Power

* Includes amount constructed through 2013. Plants are still under construction and final sizes will be larger Source: http://www.irecusa.org ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 20 - of - state - explores -

- map 1540513575 - interactive power - solar - s - u - http ://gizmodo.com/new : source

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 21 TOPAZ SOLAR FARM

 The Topaz Solar Farm, the largest PV solar facility in

the world, is located near San Luis Obispo, CA

designed and built an array with fixed-

tilt CdTe PV module panels, which generate

electricity with zero emissions and with possibly

the smallest CO 2 footprint among all the PV

modules deployed in the nation

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 22 TOPAZ SOLAR FARM

 The project is still under construction and had

attained a 500 MW capacity by the end of 2013

 The expected annual generation from the Topaz

Solar Farm is above 400 GWh

 The PG&E PPA is aimed to meet its 2020 RPS goals;

the reduction in CO 2 emissions from generation

units is approximately 377,000 tons annually

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 23

LONGYANGXIA DAM SOLAR PARK

source: //http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/m/powerchina/2014-01/02/content_17210451.htm ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 24 LONGYANGXIA DAM SOLAR PARK  China’s largest PV plant is the 320-MW Longyangxia Dam Solar Park, which is located in, Qinghai Province, China  Construction began in March 2013 and the project was commissioned on December 4, 2013  The expected annual generation is 483 GWh  Qinghai province has a total of 570 MW of solar parks, many of which are located in the Golmud desert cluster ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 25

SOLARPARK MEURO

source: http://www.habdank-pv.com/de/unter-griechischer-sonne.html

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 26 SOLARPARK MEURO

 With a total capacity of 166 MW, Solarpark Meuro is

the largest PV plant in Europe

 This solar park is located in Meuro, Germany, and

was constructed on the grounds of a former

lignite mine

 The Solarpark Meuro is expected to produce more

than 200-GWh electricity annually

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 27 ROOFTOP SOLAR

assets.inhabitat.com/wpcontent/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/12 Source: http://Source:

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 28 ROOFTOP SOLAR IN U.S.

 As of July 2013, the U.S. Energy Information

Administration (EIA) indicates that rooftop solar

electricity represents less than 0.25 % of the U.S.

electricity generation

 Government incentives aimed to promotes solar

energy have made the installations of rooftop

solar widespread in the Western states – CA, AZ,

CO and NV ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 29 ROOFTOP SOLAR IN U.S.

 Incentives include tax credits, installation cost re-

bates and net metering for customers with rooftop

solar panels; incentives are location dependent

 At present 43 states, the District of Columbia and 4

territories offer net metering ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 30 U.S. NET METERING MAP

Net Metering. www.dsireusa.org / July 2013

43 states, + Washington DC & 4 territories,have adopted a net metering policy.

Note: Numbers indicate individual system capacity limit in kilowatts. Some limits vary by customer type, technology and/or application. Other limits might also apply. This map generally does not address statutory changes until administrative rules have been adopted to implement such changes. ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 31 NET METERING

 Under net metering – a billing mechanism that

credits system owners for the ex-

cess energy injected into the grid – customers pay

only for the electricity consumed that exceeds the

amount fed into the utility, the so-called net energy

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 32 NET METERING

- metering// solar/net - Source: http://www.seia.org/policy/distributed

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 33 NET METERING

net energy consumption = Ɛ 2 + Ɛ 3 – Ɛ 1 kW excess PV power output energy sold loads to the grid Ɛ 1

Ɛ 3

Ɛ 2 midnight energy bought from the grid midnight

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 34 NET METERING

 The implementation of net metering varies from

one jurisdiction to another

 In CA, solar owners receive federal tax credits,

rebates under the CA Solar Initiative, which is

being phased out, and net metering; from 2010 to

2012, the kW installed increased at 160 % annually

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 35 NET METERING

 The payment foregone by the net metered solar

owners are pushing the distribution utilities to

shift the collection of the electricity infrastructure

to the non-solar-owner customers; utilities view

this development as the “death spiral ”

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 36 RENEWABLE ENERGY CERTIFICATE ( REC )  The REC, also known as the green tag or renewable energy credit is a tradeable and non-tangible energy commodity that provides proof of the production of 1-MWh electricity from a renewable resource  Every renewable energy resource gets paid for its production from two sources: the energy is compensated through sales into the organized electricity markets or PPAs and the trading of the RECs that represent that energy production

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 37 RENEWABLE ENERGY CERTIFICATES ( RECs )  The RECs convey the environmental benefits of

the renewable resource electricity and, under a

tracking mechanism, provide direct accounting

to meet the RPS goals of each jurisdiction

 The RECs provide auditable proof of the amount

of renewable energy production injected into the

grid

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 38 RECs

 However, since the energy and the RECs are sold separately and possibly to different buyers, the consumption of the green energy and the proof of the production may be in different jurisdictions  The prices of RECs vary from one jurisdiction to another and their use across different states are subject to the non-uniform rules of each state  RECs provide buyers and sellers flexibility in trading renewable energy across state borders

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 39 KEY PV BENEFITS

 Residential and commercial PV system installa-

tions reduce the amount of electricity such

customers purchase from the local utility

 As PV systems produce the most power when the

insolation is highest at noon, their contributions

can reduce the need for the expensive and pollu-

ting fossil generation at those operating times

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 40 KEY PV BENEFITS

 PV systems as energy resources lessen the nation’s dependence on fossil fuels  The electricity generated by PV systems is clean and renewable, which helps reduce the amount of greenhouse gases – a major contributor to global climate change  The growing PV industry provides local jobs and economic development opportunities to states and regions to support sustainable energy ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 41 th THE KEY DRIVERS OF U.S. PV GROWTH  A most important driver is the declining costs of installed PV; in addition, the legislative and regulatory initiatives at the federal and state levels helped the growth of US PV in the past few years  The federal drivers include  tax incentives that were established to accele- rate the PV installations;  loan guarantees, enacted in the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), allowed the US Department of Energy to provide ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 42 THE KEY DRIVERS OF U.S. PV GROWTH preferential financing support to qualifying renewable energy projects;  cash grants that provided commercial installations with the alternative to the tax credit in the form of a cash grant  At the state level, the drivers include  RPS requirements that encourage investments in solar plants to meet the prescribed goal of renewable resource electricity generation ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 43

THE KEY DRIVERS OF U.S. PV GROWTH  rebate programs enacted to reduce the total

investment costs of PV systems, especially

for residential/commercial PV installations

 net metering and TOU rates that allow

customers to offset their monthly electricity

bills by producing their own energy from

the PV systems and even selling excess

energy to the grid ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 44

2012 END US RESIDENTIAL PV INSTALLATION COST COMPONENTS

module 38 %

permitting 3 %

sales tax 5 %

electrical www.nrel.gov/docs labor 5 % supply chain : installer profit 6% costs 15 % source

installer overhead 6% installation material 8 % hardware labor 6 % inverter 7 %

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 45 2012 END U.S. UTILITY-SCALE PV INSTALLATION COST COMPONENTS

module 42 %

installer profit 2 % tracker 3 % site preparation

installation www.nrel.gov/docs

4 % : material 10 %

sale tax 5 % source installer overhead 5 % electrical labor 10 % hardware labor 6 % inverter 7 % supply chain costs 6 % ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 46 INSTALATION COSTS BY SECTORS

7 residential commercial utility

6 BOS p

5 inverter 4 dollars W / 3 module

2013 2

1 http ://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/62558.pdf source: 0

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 47 GERMANY PV INSTALLATION COSTS AND SUBSIDY

installed costs 4 20

p 3 15 W

2 10 / euros : http://www.economist.com// 1 subsidies 5 billion euros source

0 0 20071 2 3 20104 5 6 20137 year

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 48 2013 INSTALLED COST TREND

 The total installed costs for residential and

commercial systems fell by 12 % - 15 % from 2012

 The installed cost decline in 2013 was even greater

for utility-scale installations due to economies of

scale

 All cost components have fallen but the reduced

module cost over the years is the primary reason

for the steep PV system cost decline ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 49 PV SOLAR CAPACITY PRICE DECLINE

80 Source: Bloomberg, New Energy Finance, http://www.smartgridnews.com/artman/publish/Technologies_DG_Renewables/Goldman- agrees----solar-will-soon-dominate-electric-power-6465.html#.U2f86_ldUsd

60

40 $ /

20 0.74

0 1977 1983 1989 1995 2001 2007 2013

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 50 2013 PV MODULE MANUFACTURING STATUS  The top-10 manufacturing companies supplied

over 18 GW of PV modules in 2013, representing a

40 % increase over 2012 levels

 Five of the top-10 companies were publicly-listed,

vertically-integrated, China-based crystalline

silicon (c-Si ) manufacturers

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 51 2013 PV MODULE MANUFACTURING STATUS  First Solar and SunPower are the leaders in module

shipments to meet U.S. market needs

 In Japan, the leading domestic PV module

suppliers are Sharp, Kyocera and Panasonic

 The top two suppliers in European PV module

market are Schott Solar and SolarWorld

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 52 2013 TOP 10 PV MODULE MANUFACTURERS

company country Green Energy China Ltd. China Sharp Japan Canada Holding Co. Ltd. China ReneSola China First Solar U.S. Trina Solar Ltd. China First Solar U.S. Schott Solar Germany

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 53 GLOBAL PV LCOE TRENDS

historical data 50

40 kWh

/ 30 ¢ forecast 20 2013 10 http://climatecommercial.wordpress.com/page/2/ :

0 source 1 year ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 54 DOE SOLAR PROGRAM GOALS

 The U.S. Department of Energy Sunshot Initiative is

a national collaborative effort to make solar

energy cost-competitive with fossil-fired

generation technology by the end of this decade

 The goals for PV by 2020 are 4 – 5 ¢/kWh in the

residential sector, 5 – 6 ¢/kWh in the commercial

sector, and 4 – 6 ¢/kWh in the utility sector ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 55 MAJOR CHANLLENGES FOR PV DEVELOPMENT  The efficiency of typical PV modules used in

energy production is still rather low

 As a renewable resource, solar energy is highly

uncertain, variable and intermittent and the

electricity production of PV systems has limited

controllability and dispachability

ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 56 PV EFFICIENCY BY MATERIAL

production module max

c-Si laboratory cell max mc-Si theoretical

CIGS max

CdTe

a-Si 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 η ()% ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 57 PV POWER OUTPUT OF 1 – MW CdTe ARRAY IN GERMANY 1000 900 800 700 600

500

kW 400 300 200 100 0 source: CAISO samples collected on a 5 – minute basis ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 58 PV POWER OUTPUT AT THE NEVADA 70 kW POLYCRYSTALLINE ARRAY 80

70

60

50

40 kW 30

20

10

0 source: CAISO data collected on a 10 – second basis ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 59 CHRONOLOGICAL PV OUTPUT AND ERCOT LOAD PATTERNS

70 16

) )

60 50 GW

MW 12 ( ( 40

8 30 load output output 20 4 10 0 0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun source: ttp://www.ercot.com/gridinfo1 25 /49 73 97 121 145 ECE 333 © 2002 – 2014 George Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, All Rights Reserved. 60