DOCSLIB.ORG

Modified Mclaren-Marsaglia Pseudo- Random Number

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modified Mclaren-Marsaglia Pseudo- Random Number MODIFIED MCLAREN-MARSAGLIA PSEUDO- RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR AND STOCHASTIC KEY AGREEMENT By RICHARD LLOYD CHURCHILL Bachelor of Science in Chemistry and Philosophy Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1980 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 2011 MODIFIED MCLAREN-MARSAGLIA PSEUDO- RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR AND STOCHASTIC KEY AGREEMENT Thesis Approved: Dr. H. K. Dai Thesis Adviser Dr. John P. Chandler Dr. Douglas Heisterkamp Dr. Mark E. Payton Dean of the Graduate College ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 Some Basics Regarding Cryptographic Systems and Their Goals ..........................1 Session Keys and Public Key Encryption ................................................................3 Bennett and Brassard Key Agreement and Continuing Research ...........................5 Issues and Goals in Cryptology and Randomness ...................................................8 Pseudo-Random Number Generators (PRNGs).......................................................9 Periodic Generators ................................................................................................10 Aperiodic Generators .............................................................................................11 Evaluating Generators ............................................................................................13 BSI AIS 20 .............................................................................................................13 FIPS Publication 140 .............................................................................................16 IEEE Standards 1363 .............................................................................................17 Other Test Software ...............................................................................................17 The Problem Addressed .........................................................................................19 Some Existing Alternatives Based Upon Mathematical Problems ........................20 Zero-Knowledge Proofs and Key Agreement Protocols .......................................28 II. A SURVEY OF STREAM CIPHERS ....................................................................33 Stream Ciphers .......................................................................................................37 Introduction to a Brief Survey of Modern Stream Ciphers....................................39 Vernam Ciphers and One-Time Pads ....................................................................40 Electro-Mechanical Ciphers...................................................................................44 Digital Stream Ciphers ...........................................................................................45 Linear-Feedback Shift Registers (LFSR)...............................................................46 Linear Complexity .................................................................................................48 LFSR Based Stream Ciphers .................................................................................50 Geffe Generator and Correlation ...........................................................................51 Pless Generator ......................................................................................................53 Jennings Generator.................................................................................................53 Stop-and-Go Generators ........................................................................................54 Decimating and Shrinking Generators ...................................................................55 Multispeed Inner-Product Generator .....................................................................56 Gollmann Cascade Generator ................................................................................56 Summation and Threshold Generators...................................................................57 Feedback with Carry Shift Registers (FCSR) ........................................................57 Nonlinear-Feedback Shift Registers (NFSR).........................................................59 A5 ...........................................................................................................................60 SEAL......................................................................................................................61 Scream....................................................................................................................62 iii WAKE....................................................................................................................62 Complexity-Theoretic Stream Ciphers ..................................................................63 Linear Congruential Generators .............................................................................64 III. MIXING AND MATCHING USING A MCLAREN-MARSAGLIA THEME ...66 The McLaren-Marsaglia Algorithm .......................................................................67 Cryptanalysis of McLaren-Marsaglia ....................................................................68 The Bays-Durham Generator .................................................................................72 Modifying McLaren-Marsaglia .............................................................................73 Bit-Selection ..........................................................................................................77 Some Cryptographic Considerations .....................................................................89 Further Modifications of the McLaren-Marsaglia Mechanism .............................93 Deterministic Aperiodicity.....................................................................................98 IV. KEY AGREEMENT ...........................................................................................105 Themes and Goals ................................................................................................105 The Basic Scheme: Walk-through .......................................................................108 The Basic Protocol A: Formal Description ..........................................................111 Observations Regarding Protocol A ....................................................................112 Section..................................................................................................................123 V. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION .....................................................................127 Apparent Randomness of the Produced Bit-Stream ............................................130 Confidentiality .....................................................................................................132 Brute Force Time Requirements ..........................................................................143 Using the χ Square Test .......................................................................................150 Meet-in-the-Middle ..............................................................................................151 Differential Cryptanalysis ....................................................................................156 Man in the Middle ................................................................................................157 Design Issues .......................................................................................................158 Performance Results ............................................................................................161 REFERENCES ..........................................................................................................164 APPENDICES ...........................................................................................................179 iv LIST OF TABLES Table Page Correlation in the Geffe generator ............................................................................51 Correlation and the XOR operation ..........................................................................52 Probability a value x is absent from V based on size of V and bits per entry ...........77 Growth of number of candidate input string pairs Assuming n bits of output and input strings of 2 n bits .............................................80 A slice through the state table in BitBlendOpt() .......................................................96 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page A Linear Feedback Shift Register .............................................................................46 Galois configuration of an LFSR ..............................................................................47 Example of a Feedback with Carry Shift Register (FCSR) ......................................58 Generalized structure of the aperiodic generators used ..........................................113 Injection of material from axr into PRNGs B and C ..............................................115 The relationship between b, rp and bxrp ................................................................116 Processing of bxrp to obtain m................................................................................117 Generation of bit string k from bit-string m, using gernator/PRNG D ...................121 Flow
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Sneak Peek Is Now Available
    GISWatch 2020 GISW SNEAK PEEK SNEAK PEEK GLOBAL INFORMATION atch 2020 SOCIETY WATCH 2020 Technology, the environment and a sustainable world: Responses from the global South ASSOCIATION FOR PROGRESSIVE COMMUNICATIONS (APC) AND SWEDISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY (SIDA) GISWatch 2020 SNEAK PEEK Global Information Society Watch 2020 SNEAK PEEK Technology, the environment and a sustainable world: Responses from the global South APC would like to thank the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) for their support for Global Information Society Watch 2020. Published by APC 2021 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Some rights reserved. Disclaimer: The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of Sida, APC or its members. GISWatch 2020 SNEAK PEEK Table of contents Introduction: Returning to the river.... ............................................4 Alan Finlay The Sustainable Development Goals and the environment ............................9 David Souter Community networks: A people – and environment – centred approach to connectivity ................................................13 “Connecting the Unconnected” project team www.rhizomatica.org; www.apc.org Australia . 18 Queensland University of Technology and Deakin University marcus foth, monique mann, laura bedford, walter fieuw and reece walters Brazil . .23 Brazilian Association of Digital Radio (ABRADIG) anna orlova and adriana veloso Latin America . 28 Gato.Earth danae tapia and paz peña Uganda . .33 Space for Giants oliver poole GISWatch 2020 SNEAK PEEK Introduction: Returning to the river Alan Finlay do not have the same power as governments or the agribusiness, fossil fuel and extractive industries, and that to refer to them as “stakeholders” would The terrain of environmental sustainability involves make this power imbalance opaque.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudo-Random Bit Generators Based on Linear-Feedback Shift Registers in a Programmable Device
    184 Measurement Automation Monitoring, Jun. 2016, no. 06, vol. 62, ISSN 2450-2855 Maciej PAROL, Paweł DĄBAL, Ryszard SZPLET MILITARY UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, FACULTY OF ELECTRONICS 2 Gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland Pseudo-random bit generators based on linear-feedback shift registers in a programmable device Abstract known how to construct LFSRs with the maximum period since they correspond to primitive polynomials over the binary field F2. We present the results of comparative study on three pseudo-random bit The N-bit length LFSR with a well-chosen feedback function generators (PRBG) based on various use of linear-feedback shift registers gives the sequence of maximal period (LFSR). The project was focused on implementation and tests of three such PRBG in programmable device Spartan 6, Xilinx. Tests of the designed PRBGs were performed with the use of standard statistical tests =2 . (1) NIST SP800-22. For example, an eight bit LFSR will have 255 states. LFSRs Keywords: pseudo-random bit generators, linear-feedback shift register, generators have good statistical properties, however they have low programmable device. linear complexity equal to their order (only N in considered case), which is the main drawback of primitive LFSRs. They can 1. Introduction be easily reconstructed having a short output segment of length just 2N [4]. In addition, they are very easy for implementation in In dynamically developed domains of information technology programmable devices. Figure 1 presents the structure of a simple and telecommunication, sequences of random generated bits are LFSR-based generator. still more and more required and used. There are two common sources of random bits, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking Crypto Without Keys: Analyzing Data in Web Applications Chris Eng
    Breaking Crypto Without Keys: Analyzing Data in Web Applications Chris Eng 1 Introduction – Chris Eng _ Director of Security Services, Veracode _ Former occupations . 2000-2006: Senior Consulting Services Technical Lead with Symantec Professional Services (@stake up until October 2004) . 1998-2000: US Department of Defense _ Primary areas of expertise . Web Application Penetration Testing . Network Penetration Testing . Product (COTS) Penetration Testing . Exploit Development (well, a long time ago...) _ Lead developer for @stake’s now-extinct WebProxy tool 2 Assumptions _ This talk is aimed primarily at penetration testers but should also be useful for developers to understand how your application might be vulnerable _ Assumes basic understanding of cryptographic terms but requires no understanding of the underlying math, etc. 3 Agenda 1 Problem Statement 2 Crypto Refresher 3 Analysis Techniques 4 Case Studies 5 Q & A 4 Problem Statement 5 Problem Statement _ What do you do when you encounter unknown data in web applications? . Cookies . Hidden fields . GET/POST parameters _ How can you tell if something is encrypted or trivially encoded? _ How much do I really have to know about cryptography in order to exploit implementation weaknesses? 6 Goals _ Understand some basic techniques for analyzing and breaking down unknown data _ Understand and recognize characteristics of bad crypto implementations _ Apply techniques to real-world penetration tests 7 Crypto Refresher 8 Types of Ciphers _ Block Cipher . Operates on fixed-length groups of bits, called blocks . Block sizes vary depending on the algorithm (most algorithms support several different block sizes) . Several different modes of operation for encrypting messages longer than the basic block size .
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Your Ps and Qs: Detection of Widespread Weak Keys in Network Devices
    Mining Your Ps and Qs: Detection of Widespread Weak Keys in Network Devices † ‡ ‡ ‡ Nadia Heninger ∗ Zakir Durumeric ∗ Eric Wustrow J. Alex Halderman † University of California, San Diego ‡ The University of Michigan [email protected] {zakir, ewust, jhalderm}@umich.edu Abstract expect that today’s widely used operating systems and RSA and DSA can fail catastrophically when used with server software generate random numbers securely. In this malfunctioning random number generators, but the extent paper, we test that proposition empirically by examining to which these problems arise in practice has never been the public keys in use on the Internet. comprehensively studied at Internet scale. We perform The first component of our study is the most compre- the largest ever network survey of TLS and SSH servers hensive Internet-wide survey to date of two of the most and present evidence that vulnerable keys are surprisingly important cryptographic protocols, TLS and SSH (Sec- widespread. We find that 0.75% of TLS certificates share tion 3.1). By scanning the public IPv4 address space, keys due to insufficient entropy during key generation, we collected 5.8 million unique TLS certificates from and we suspect that another 1.70% come from the same 12.8 million hosts and 6.2 million unique SSH host keys faulty implementations and may be susceptible to com- from 10.2 million hosts. This is 67% more TLS hosts promise. Even more alarmingly, we are able to obtain than the latest released EFF SSL Observatory dataset [18]. RSA private keys for 0.50% of TLS hosts and 0.03% of Our techniques take less than 24 hours to scan the entire SSH hosts, because their public keys shared nontrivial address space for listening hosts and less than 96 hours common factors due to entropy problems, and DSA pri- to retrieve keys from them.
    [Show full text]
  • SGX Secure Enclaves in Practice Security and Crypto Review
    SGX Secure Enclaves in Practice Security and Crypto Review JP Aumasson, Luis Merino This talk ● First SGX review from real hardware and SDK ● Revealing undocumented parts of SGX ● Tool and application releases Props Victor Costan (MIT) Shay Gueron (Intel) Simon Johnson (Intel) Samuel Neves (Uni Coimbra) Joanna Rutkowska (Invisible Things Lab) Arrigo Triulzi Dan Zimmerman (Intel) Kudelski Security for supporting this research Agenda .theory What's SGX, how secure is it? .practice Developing for SGX on Windows and Linux .theory Cryptography schemes and implementations .practice Our projects: reencryption, metadata extraction What's SGX, how secure is it? New instruction set in Skylake Intel CPUs since autumn 2015 SGX as a reverse sandbox Protects enclaves of code/data from ● Operating System, or hypervisor ● BIOS, firmware, drivers ● System Management Mode (SMM) ○ aka ring -2 ○ Software “between BIOS and OS” ● Intel Management Engine (ME) ○ aka ring -3 ○ “CPU in the CPU” ● By extension, any remote attack = reverse sandbox Simplified workflow 1. Write enclave program (no secrets) 2. Get it attested (signed, bound to a CPU) 3. Provision secrets, from a remote client 4. Run enclave program in the CPU 5. Get the result, and a proof that it's the result of the intended computation Example: make reverse engineer impossible 1. Enclave generates a key pair a. Seals the private key b. Shares the public key with the authenticated client 2. Client sends code encrypted with the enclave's public key 3. CPU decrypts the code and executes it A trusted
    [Show full text]
  • On the Security of IV Dependent Stream Ciphers
    On the Security of IV Dependent Stream Ciphers Côme Berbain and Henri Gilbert France Telecom R&D {[email protected]} research & development Stream Ciphers IV-less IV-dependent key K key K IV (initial value) number ? generator keystream keystream plaintext ⊕ ciphertext plaintext ⊕ ciphertext e.g. RC4, Shrinking Generator e.g. SNOW, Scream, eSTREAM ciphers well founded theory [S81,Y82,BM84] less unanimously agreed theory practical limitations: prior work [RC94, HN01, Z06] - no reuse of K numerous chosen IV attacks - synchronisation - key and IV setup not well understood IV setup – H. Gilbert (2) research & developement Orange Group Outline security requirements on IV-dependent stream ciphers whole cipher key and IV setup key and IV setup constructions satisfying these requirements blockcipher based tree based application example: QUAD incorporate key and IV setup in QUAD's provable security argument IV setup – H. Gilbert (3) research & developement Orange Group Security in IV-less case: PRNG notion m K∈R{0,1} number truly random VS generator g generator g g(K) ∈{0,1}L L OR Z ∈R{0,1} 1 input A 0 or 1 PRNG A tests number distributions: Adv g (A) = PrK [A(g(K)) = 1] − PrZ [A(Z) = 1] PRNG PRNG Advg (t) = maxA,T(A)≤t (Advg (A)) PRNG 80 g is a secure cipher ⇔ g is a PRNG ⇔ Advg (t < 2 ) <<1 IV setup – H. Gilbert (4) research & developement Orange Group Security in IV-dependent case: PRF notion stream cipher perfect random fct. IV∈ {0,1}n function generator VSOR g* gK G = {gK} gK(IV) q oracle queries • A 0 or 1 PRF gK g* A tests function distributions: Adv G (A) = Pr[A = 1] − Pr[A = 1] PRF PRF Adv G (t, q) = max A (Adv G (A)) PRF 80 40 G is a secure cipher ⇔ G is a PRF ⇔ Adv G (t < 2 ,2 ) << 1 IV setup – H.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • World Economic Survey 1963
    WORLD ECONOMIC SURVEY 1963 II. Current Economic Developments UNITED NATIONS Department of Economic and Social Affairs Vv'©RLD ECONOMIC SURVEY 1963 t II. Current Economic Developments UNITED NATIONS New York, 1964 E/3902/Rev.1 ST/Y, CA/Sa UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION J Sales No. : 64. II.C. 3 Price: SU.S. 1.50 (or equivalent in other currencies) FOREWORD This report represents part II of the World Economic Survey, 1963. As indicated in the Foreword to part I, "'Trade and Development: Trends, Needs and Policies" (Sales No. :64.II.C.1), it consists of three chapters and an annex dealing with recent developments in the world economy. Chapter 1 analyses the situation in the industrially advanced private enterprise countries. Chapter 2 reviews current trends in the Countries that are heavily dependent on the export of primary commodities. Chapter 3 provides an account of recent changes in the centrally planned economies. The three chapters follow an introduction which draws attention to some of the salient features of the current situation. The annex presents a summary of the current primary commodity situation. Most of the analysis is concerned with the calendar year 1963; chapters 1 and 2 conclude with brief assessments of the outlook for 1964. These discussions of outlook draw to a large extent on the replies of Governments to a questionnaire on economic trends, problems and policies circulated by the Secretary-General in November 1963. Like part I, part II of the World Economic Survey, 1963 was prepared in the Department of Economic and Social Affairs by the Bureau of General Economic Research and Policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Bias in the LEVIATHAN Stream Cipher
    Bias in the LEVIATHAN Stream Cipher Paul Crowley1? and Stefan Lucks2?? 1 cryptolabs Amsterdam [email protected] 2 University of Mannheim [email protected] Abstract. We show two methods of distinguishing the LEVIATHAN stream cipher from a random stream using 236 bytes of output and pro- portional effort; both arise from compression within the cipher. The first models the cipher as two random functions in sequence, and shows that the probability of a collision in 64-bit output blocks is doubled as a re- sult; the second shows artifacts where the same inputs are presented to the key-dependent S-boxes in the final stage of the cipher for two suc- cessive outputs. Both distinguishers are demonstrated with experiments on a reduced variant of the cipher. 1 Introduction LEVIATHAN [5] is a stream cipher proposed by David McGrew and Scott Fluhrer for the NESSIE project [6]. Like most stream ciphers, it maps a key onto a pseudorandom keystream that can be XORed with the plaintext to generate the ciphertext. But it is unusual in that the keystream need not be generated in strict order from byte 0 onwards; arbitrary ranges of the keystream may be generated efficiently without the cost of generating and discarding all prior val- ues. In other words, the keystream is “seekable”. This property allows data from any part of a large encrypted file to be retrieved efficiently, without decrypting the whole file prior to the desired point; it is also useful for applications such as IPsec [2]. Other stream ciphers with this property include block ciphers in CTR mode [3].
    [Show full text]
  • RC4-2S: RC4 Stream Cipher with Two State Tables
    RC4-2S: RC4 Stream Cipher with Two State Tables Maytham M. Hammood, Kenji Yoshigoe and Ali M. Sagheer Abstract One of the most important symmetric cryptographic algorithms is Rivest Cipher 4 (RC4) stream cipher which can be applied to many security applications in real time security. However, RC4 cipher shows some weaknesses including a correlation problem between the public known outputs of the internal state. We propose RC4 stream cipher with two state tables (RC4-2S) as an enhancement to RC4. RC4-2S stream cipher system solves the correlation problem between the public known outputs of the internal state using permutation between state 1 (S1) and state 2 (S2). Furthermore, key generation time of the RC4-2S is faster than that of the original RC4 due to less number of operations per a key generation required by the former. The experimental results confirm that the output streams generated by the RC4-2S are more random than that generated by RC4 while requiring less time than RC4. Moreover, RC4-2S’s high resistivity protects against many attacks vulnerable to RC4 and solves several weaknesses of RC4 such as distinguishing attack. Keywords Stream cipher Á RC4 Á Pseudo-random number generator This work is based in part, upon research supported by the National Science Foundation (under Grant Nos. CNS-0855248 and EPS-0918970). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies or those of the employers. M. M. Hammood Applied Science, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, USA e-mail: [email protected] K.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascon (A Submission to CAESAR)
    Ascon (A Submission to CAESAR) Ch. Dobraunig1, M. Eichlseder1, F. Mendel1, M. Schl¨affer2 1IAIK, Graz University of Technology, Austria 2Infineon Technologies AG, Austria 22nd Crypto Day, Infineon, Munich Overview CAESAR Design of Ascon Security analysis Implementations 1 / 20 CAESAR CAESAR: Competition for Authenticated Encryption { Security, Applicability, and Robustness (2014{2018) http://competitions.cr.yp.to/caesar.html Inspired by AES, eStream, SHA-3 Authenticated Encryption Confidentiality as provided by block cipher modes Authenticity, Integrity as provided by MACs \it is very easy to accidentally combine secure encryption schemes with secure MACs and still get insecure authenticated encryption schemes" { Kohno, Whiting, and Viega 2 / 20 CAESAR CAESAR: Competition for Authenticated Encryption { Security, Applicability, and Robustness (2014{2018) http://competitions.cr.yp.to/caesar.html Inspired by AES, eStream, SHA-3 Authenticated Encryption Confidentiality as provided by block cipher modes Authenticity, Integrity as provided by MACs \it is very easy to accidentally combine secure encryption schemes with secure MACs and still get insecure authenticated encryption schemes" { Kohno, Whiting, and Viega 2 / 20 Generic compositions MAC-then-Encrypt (MtE) e.g. in SSL/TLS MAC M security depends on E and MAC E ∗ C T k Encrypt-and-MAC (E&M) ∗ e.g. in SSH E C M security depends on E and MAC MAC T Encrypt-then-MAC (EtM) ∗ IPSec, ISO/IEC 19772:2009 M E C provably secure MAC T 3 / 20 Tags for M = IV (N 1), M = IV (N 2), . ⊕ k ⊕ k are the key stream to read M1, M2,... (Keys for) E ∗ and MAC must be independent! Pitfalls: Dependent Keys (Confidentiality) Encrypt-and-MAC with CBC-MAC and CTR CTR CBC-MAC Nk1 Nk2 Nk` M1 M2 M` IV ··· EK EK ··· EK EK EK EK M1 M2 M` C1 C2 C` T What can an attacker do? 4 / 20 Pitfalls: Dependent Keys (Confidentiality) Encrypt-and-MAC with CBC-MAC and CTR CTR CBC-MAC Nk1 Nk2 Nk` M1 M2 M` IV ··· EK EK ··· EK EK EK EK M1 M2 M` C1 C2 C` T What can an attacker do? Tags for M = IV (N 1), M = IV (N 2), .
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Cryptography Copyright © 1990-1999 Network Associates, Inc
    An Introduction to Cryptography Copyright © 1990-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its Affiliated Companies. All Rights Reserved. PGP*, Version 6.5.1 6-99. Printed in the United States of America. PGP, Pretty Good, and Pretty Good Privacy are registered trademarks of Network Associates, Inc. and/or its Affiliated Companies in the US and other countries. All other registered and unregistered trademarks in this document are the sole property of their respective owners. Portions of this software may use public key algorithms described in U.S. Patent numbers 4,200,770, 4,218,582, 4,405,829, and 4,424,414, licensed exclusively by Public Key Partners; the IDEA(tm) cryptographic cipher described in U.S. patent number 5,214,703, licensed from Ascom Tech AG; and the Northern Telecom Ltd., CAST Encryption Algorithm, licensed from Northern Telecom, Ltd. IDEA is a trademark of Ascom Tech AG. Network Associates Inc. may have patents and/or pending patent applications covering subject matter in this software or its documentation; the furnishing of this software or documentation does not give you any license to these patents. The compression code in PGP is by Mark Adler and Jean-Loup Gailly, used with permission from the free Info-ZIP implementation. LDAP software provided courtesy University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Copyright © 1992-1996 Regents of the University of Michigan. All rights reserved. This product includes software developed by the Apache Group for use in the Apache HTTP server project (http://www.apache.org/). Copyright © 1995-1999 The Apache Group. All rights reserved. See text files included with the software or the PGP web site for further information.
    [Show full text]