Species Composition and Abundance of Rotifers in Different Environments of the Floodplain of the Upper Parana River, Brazil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Species Composition and Abundance of Rotifers in Different Environments of the Floodplain of the Upper Parana River, Brazil SPECIES COMPOSITION AND ABUNDANCE OF ROTIFERS IN DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS OF THE FLOODPLAIN OF THE UPPER PARANA RIVER, BRAZIL Aparecida Paula Perez Garcia 1 Fabio Amodeo Lansac-T6ha 1 Claudia Costa Bonecker 1 A BSTRACT. The purpose of this study was to describe the composition and abundan­ ce of rotifers in different env ironments: one lotic (the Ivinheima River) and another lenti c (the Patos Lake) located in the floo dpl ain of the Upper Parana River. The influence of lim no logical variables on the structure and dynamics ofrotifers was also examined. Samples were taken monthl y li·om March 1992 through FebrualY 1993, in the open water region of the lake and river and in the channel between them and, in the littoral region of the lake and river. Of the 96 species identified, the best represented fami lies were: Brachionidae (20 species), Lecanidae ( 18 species), and Trichocercidae (15 species). 55 species were widely di stributed, 13 were pantropical, 16 neotrop ical (8 endemic to South America). Trichocerca gracilis was a new record for this fl oodpl ain. Dipleuchlanis propalula propalllla, Lecane cllrvicornis, L. leonlina, L. bulla, Plalionlls patuilis patuills, Platyias quadricornis quadricorllis, Testudinella pOlino, and T 1I111cronata hauriellsis wcre consistently present. More species were recorded during the hi gh water period, probably because of the interconnecti on among the di fferent environments of the fl oodplain that allows fauna exchange and an increase in ava il ab le hab itats. Rotifer densities wcre hi gher mainly in the lake, during the high water. Us ing principal components analys is, was identitied four variables that influ­ ence the seasonal vari ation in the rotifcr densities: water level, dissolved oxygen, chl orophyll-a concentration, and water temperature. KEY WORDS. Rotifera, Parana River, floodplain , neotropics On a floodplain, the seasonal varIatIon in the hydrolog ical conditions, characterized by the occurrence of hi g h water a nd low water periods, is a funda­ m e ntal ecolog ica l factor. W a ter leve l variations cause changes in the abiotic and biotic features of the whole system and regu la te the exchange of m a tter a nd energy be tvveen the main river and the adjacent cnvironments (JUNK et af. 1989). The P a ra na River has areas of tloodplain in some of its stretches; in this e nvironment and others, the zooplankton community varies in its composition and abundance in relation to changes in phys ical, chemical, and biological charac­ teristics (V ASQUEZ I 984a,b; ROBERTSON & HARDY 1984; PAGGl & JOSE DE P AGGI 1990; LA NSAC-T o HA et af. 1997). Among the zooplankton, the rotifers are notably most the abundant and diverse. This community richness, a llied to their high turnover, indicates the ecological importance of rotifers in energy flow and nutrient cycling (ALLAN 1976). 1) Curso de P6s-gradua9ao em Ambientes Aquaticos Continentais, Departamento de Biologia, Nupelia, Universidade Estadual de Maringa. Avenida Colombo 5790, 87020-900 Maringa, Parana, Brasil. Revta bras. Zool. 15 (2): 327 - 343,1 998 328 GARCIA et al. The aim ofthis paper is to describe the composition and abundance ofrotifers in a lotic environment (lvinheima River) and a lentic environment (Patos Lake), located in the floodplain of the Upper Parana River, Mato Grosso do Sui State, as well as to identity the influence of physical, chemical, and biological variables on the rotifer community structure and dynamics. MATERIALS AND METHODS Study area The Ivinheima River (22°49'33"S and 53°33'46"W) has a meandering pattern and turbulent waters. Its margins are covered by grasses (Polygonon sp.) and, in part, occupied by aquatic macrophytes (Eichhornia azurea Kunth). The Ivinheima communicates with the Parana River by a channel (Fig. I). The Patos lake (22°43' 12"S and 53°)7'3 7"W) is located on the right bank of the Parana River and on the left bank of the Ivinheima River, communicating with the latter throughout the year by a channel. This channel contains large beds of aquatic macrophytes along its length and its bank is dominated by grasses. The flow direction and water speed in the channel vary according to the flood stage of the river. The irregular shore at the lake is covered by grasses and small beds of aquatic macrophytes, predominantly E. azurea (Fig. 1). Sampling stations For this study, was established five sampling stations (F ig. I): two in the lake (Stations 1 - open water region and 2 -littoral region), one in the channel between the river and the lake (Station 3 - open water), and two in the river (Stations 4 - littoral region and 5 - open water region). Physical, chemical, and biological variables We collected monthly samples for physical, chemical, and biological varia­ bles, always during the morning, from March 1992 to FebrualY 1993, at all stations. At stations 1 and 3 were collected the samples at three depths of the water column (surface, middle, and bottom), at station 5, at two depths (surface and bottom), and at stations 2 and 4, only on the surface. Water level data for the Parana River were supplied by DNAEE (National Department of Water and Energy). Analyses of the abiotic and biotic variables: water temperature (0C), water column transparency (m), dissolved oxygen (mg/I), pH, electrical conductivity (flS/cm), and chlorophyll-a concentration (mg/I) were conducted according to the methodology described by THOMAZ et at. (1992). Rotifers We obtained the rotifer samples with a motori zed pump filtering 1000 liters of water for each sample through a 70 flm mesh plankton net. Rotifers (ind/m3) were quantified by counting sub-samples in a Sedgwick­ Rafter cell; at least 200 individuals of each sample were counted. Identification was based on KOSTE (1978), KOSTE & ROBERTSON (1983) and SEGERS (1995). Revta bras. Zool. 15 (2): 327 - 343,1998 Species composition and abdance of rotifers in different environments... 329 23°00'-t'+-----"---t------+-------23°00' .. Sampling Sf ot iorlS ~ -+- Oirect ion of Wot er Curren' Fig . 1. Sampling stations. Constancy Index and Geographical Distribution A Constancy Index ( C) for each species recorded at the five sampl ing stations, was determined by the expression c = (n x 100)1N , where "n" is the number of samples containing the species and "N" is the total number of samples co ll ected (DAJOZ 1973). According to the results of this index, the species were considered constant when they occurred in more than 50% of the samples; accessory, when recorded in 25%-50% of the samples, and accidental when present in less than 25% of the samples. From the data on geograph ic distribution for each species (KOSTE 1978; JosE DE PAGGI 1990; BONECKER et at. 1994), the species were classified as having a widespread distribution, as pantropical, neotropical, or neotropical and endemic to South America. Principal components analysis (PCA) To evaluate the influence of the temporal and spatial vanatlOn of the environmental factors on the total densities of the rotifers and the principal species, were conducted a multivariate analysis of the data. PCA examines the interdepen­ dence among the variables and , from the data, discovers models that allow us to form ul ate hypothesis as a function of the estimated variables (PLA 1986). Revta bras. Zool. 15 (2): 327 - 343, 1998 330 GARCIA et al. From this analysis was derived a data matrix with all the linmological variables (Tabs r, II). The data, except for pH, were log transformed [Log (x+ 1)], and standardized since were dealing with variables with distinct units of measure­ ment. PCA was performed using Statislica software (STATSOFT 1991). To interpret the analysis was considered the axis that explained in total 50% or more of the variability of the data. Only those variables with structure coefficients = 0.5 were considered. Table I. Water level of the Parana River. Average values (x), standard deviation (s), maximum (max) and minimum (mim) environmental variables obtained at five sampling stations in March 1992 - February 1993. For stations 2 and 5 only surface data are presented. These data were used in the PCA. Variables per Station Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Water level (m) 4.20 4.60 4.80 3.44 2.80 2.91 2.88 3.23 4.42 4.77 4.13 5.36 Station 1 Depth (m) 4.20 4.60 6.60 5.80 4.20 3.60 3.80 4.40 4.80 5.60 4.00 4.60 Water transparency (m) 1.20 0.80 0.50 1.40 1.70 0.90 0.60 0.60 1.10 1.80 1.40 1.00 Water temperature ('C) ; 26.43 25.56 23.96 23.36 18.13 18 .30 20.80 23.36 26.53 29.10 26.83 27.93 s 0.58 0.05 0.05 0.15 0.30 0.20 0.26 0.11 1.45 0.36 0.25 0.20 Max 27.10 25.60 24.00 23.50 18.40 18.50 21 .00 23.50 28 .00 29.40 27.10 28.10 Min 26.00 25.50 23.90 23.20 17.80 18.10 20.50 23.30 25.10 28.70 26.60 27.70 Dissolved oxygen (m g ~) 55.50 22.43 27.66 16.36 37.13 94.90 93.83 16.60 67.36 18.43 46.40 25.90 s 0.58 0.05 0.05 0.15 0.30 0.20 0.26 0.11 1.45 0.36 0.25 0.20 Max 67.60 24.00 29.50 17.40 41 .70 97.00 96.40 18.20 97.80 23.10 50.30 27.90 Min 32.60 20.70 25.50 14.70 30.20 92.40 90.70 13.90 32.00 14.40 43.50 22 .50 Electrical conductivity (~S/cm) 49.33 40.66 35.00 45.66 39.66 31.66 33.00 41.33 38.33 36.00 36.00 37.00 s 3.21 0.57 0.00 1.52 0.57 115 0.00 0.57 1.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 Max 53.00 41 .00 35.00 47.00 40.00 33.00 33.00 42.00 40.00 36.00 36.00 37.00 Min 47.00 40.00 35.00 44.00 39.00 31 .00 33.00 41 .00 37.00 36.00 36.00 37.00 pH x 6.60 6.10 6.26 6.13 6.23 6.36 7.50 6.33 6.76 6.43 6.53 6.40 s 0.14 0.00 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.15 0.17 0.05 0.11 0.05 0,05 0.00 Max 6.70 6.10 6.40 6.20 6.30 6.50 7.70 6.40 6.90 6.50 6.60
Recommended publications
  • Volume 2, Chapter 4-7C: Invertebrates: Rotifer Taxa
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Invertebrates: Rotifer Taxa – Monogononta. Chapt. 4-7c. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. 4-7c-1 Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 18 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 4-7c INVERTEBRATES: ROTIFER TAXA – MONOGONONTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Notommatidae ............................................................................................................................................ 4-7c-2 Cephalodella ....................................................................................................................................... 4-7c-2 Drilophaga ........................................................................................................................................ 4-7c-10 Enteroplea ......................................................................................................................................... 4-7c-11 Eosphora ........................................................................................................................................... 4-7c-11 Eothinia ............................................................................................................................................. 4-7c-12 Monommata ...................................................................................................................................... 4-7c-12 Notommata .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rotifera: Monogononta)
    Anim. Syst. Evol. Divers. Vol. 36, No. 3: 222-227, July 2020 https://doi.org/10.5635/ASED.2020.36.3.046 Review article New Record of Kellicottia bostoniensis and Redescription of Two Freshwater Rotifers from Korea (Rotifera: Monogononta) Hee-Min Yang, Gi-Sik Min* Department of Biological Sciences, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea ABSTRACT In this study, we identified three monogonont rotifers from South Korea: Kellicottia bostoniensis (Rousselet, 1908), Trichocerca tenuior (Gosse, 1886), and Lepadella triptera (Ehrenberg, 1830). The distribution records of K. bostoniensis were mainly located in the Nearctic, Neotropic and Western Palearctic regions. After Japan, this is the second record of it in Asia. Trichocerca tenuior and Lepadella triptera have already been recorded in Korea, but the data of two species were insufficient in previous study. Here, we describe the morphological characteristics of the three species and the trophi structures of K. bostoniensis and T. tenuior. This study is the first to characterize the trophi structure of K. bostoniensis, observed using a scanning electron microscope. In addition, we have determined the partial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) and 18S rRNA gene sequences of T. tenuior and L. triptera for their DNA barcodes. Keywords: ‌biodiversity, East Asia, monogonont rotifers, SEM, taxonomy INTRODUCTION 1999). The genus Trichocerca Lamarck, 1801 is a species-rich Research on rotifers in Korea was started by Hada (1936), who taxon in the monogonont rotifers. It comprises 77 species collected 17 species from Lake Seo-ho in Suwon-si, Gyeong- and inhabits various environments such as fresh, brack- gi-do, South Korea. So far, 305 species have been recorded in ish, and marine water (Segers, 2007; Jersabek and Leitner, Korea (National Institute of Biological Resources and Minis- 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Available Names in Zoology, Candidate Part Phylum Rotifera, Genus-Group Names Established Before 1 January 2000
    List of Available Names in Zoology, Candidate Part Phylum Rotifera, genus-group names established before 1 January 2000 compiled by Christian D. Jersabek Willem H. De Smet Claus Hinz Diego Fontaneto Charles G. Hussey Evangelia Michaloudi Robert L. Wallace Hendrik Segers 05 August 2015 List of Available Names in Zoology, candidate part Phylum Rotifera – Genus-group names Abrochtha, Bryce 1910; Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, (ser. 2) 11: p.77; type species, by original mono- typy: Philodina intermedia Beauchamp, 1909 [valid; gender feminine] Acanthodactylus, Tessin 1890; Archiv der Freunde der Naturgeschichte in Mecklenburg, 43: p.152; type species, by subsequent designation (Wiszniewski, 1954: Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii, 2: p.121): Trichoda rattus Müller, 1776; preoccupied by Acanthodactylus Wiegmann, 1834 (Reptilia) [permanently invalid, junior objective synonym of Trichocerca Lamarck, 1801; gender masculine] Actinurus, Ehrenberg 1830; in Ehrenberg, C G, Organisation, Systematik und geographisches Verhältnis der Infusi- onsthierchen. Zwei Vorträge in der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin gehalten in den Jahren 1828 [Die geo- graphische Verbreitung der Infusionsthierchen in Nord-Afrika und West-Asien, beobachtet auf Hemprich und Ehren- bergs Reisen] und 1830 [Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Organisation der Infusorien und ihrer geographischen Verbrei- tung, besonders in Sibirien]: p.68; type species, by original monotypy: Actinurus neptunius Ehrenberg, 1830 [junior subjective synonym of Rotaria Scopoli, 1777; gender masculine]
    [Show full text]
  • The Rotifers of Spanish Reservoirs: Ecological, Systematical and Zoogeographical Remarks
    91 THE ROTIFERS OF SPANISH RESERVOIRS: ECOLOGICAL, SYSTEMATICAL AND ZOOGEOGRAPHICAL REMARKS Jordi de Manuel Barrabin Departament d'Ecologia, Universitat de Barcelona. Avd. Diagonal 645,08028 Barcelona. Spain,[email protected] ABSTRACT This article covers the rotifer data from a 1987/1988 survey of one hundred Spanish reservoirs. From each species brief infor- mation is given, focused mainly on ecology, morphology, zoogeography and distribution both in Spain and within reservoirs. New autoecological information on each species is also established giving conductivity ranges, alkalinity, pH and temperature for each. Original drawings and photographs obtained on both optical and electronic microscopy are shown of the majority of the species found. In total one hundred and ten taxa were identified, belonging to 101 species, representing 20 families: Epiphanidae (1): Brachionidae (23); Euchlanidae (1); Mytilinidae (1 ): Trichotriidae (3): Colurellidae (8); Lecanidae (1 5); Proalidae (2); Lindiidae (1); Notommatidae (5); Trichocercidae (7); Gastropodidae (5); Synchaetidae (1 1); Asplanchnidae (3); Testudinellidae (3); Conochiliidae (5):Hexarthridae (2); Filiniidae (3); Collothecidae (2); Philodinidae (Bdelloidea) (I). Thirteen species were new records for the Iberian rotifer fauna: Kerutella ticinensis (Ehrenberg); Lepadella (X.) ustucico- la Hauer; Lecane (M.) copeis Harring & Myers; Lecane tenuiseta Harring: Lecane (M.) tethis Harring & Myers; Proales fal- laciosa Wulfert; Lindia annecta Harring & Myers; Notommatu cerberus Hudson & Gosse; Notommata copeus Ehrenberg: Resticula nyssu Harring & Myers; Trichocerca vernalis Hauer; Gustropus hyptopus Ehrenberg: Collothecu mutabilis Hudson. Key Words: Rotifera, plankton, heleoplankton, reservoirs RESUMEN Este urticulo proporciona infiirmacicin sobre 10s rotferos hullados en el estudio 1987/88 realizudo sobre cien embalses espafioles. Para cnda especie se da una breve informacicin, ,fundamentalmente sobre aspectos ecoldgicos, morfoldgicos, zoo- geogriificos, asi como de su distribucidn en EspaAa y en los emldses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of External Factors in the Variability of the Structure of the Zooplankton Community of Small Lakes (South-East Kazakhstan)
    water Article The Role of External Factors in the Variability of the Structure of the Zooplankton Community of Small Lakes (South-East Kazakhstan) Moldir Aubakirova 1,2,*, Elena Krupa 3 , Zhanara Mazhibayeva 2, Kuanysh Isbekov 2 and Saule Assylbekova 2 1 Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan 2 Fisheries Research and Production Center, Almaty 050016, Kazakhstan; mazhibayeva@fishrpc.kz (Z.M.); isbekov@fishrpc.kz (K.I.); assylbekova@fishrpc.kz (S.A.) 3 Institute of Zoology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-27-3831715 Abstract: The variability of hydrochemical parameters, the heterogeneity of the habitat, and a low level of anthropogenic impact, create the premises for conserving the high biodiversity of aquatic communities of small water bodies. The study of small water bodies contributes to understanding aquatic organisms’ adaptation to sharp fluctuations in external factors. Studies of biological com- munities’ response to fluctuations in external factors can be used for bioindication of the ecological state of small water bodies. In this regard, the purpose of the research is to study the structure of zooplankton of small lakes in South-East Kazakhstan in connection with various physicochemical parameters to understand the role of biological variables in assessing the ecological state of aquatic Citation: Aubakirova, M.; Krupa, E.; ecosystems. According to hydrochemical data in summer 2019, the nutrient content was relatively Mazhibayeva, Z.; Isbekov, K.; high in all studied lakes. A total of 74 species were recorded in phytoplankton. The phytoplankton Assylbekova, S. The Role of External abundance varied significantly, from 8.5 × 107 to 2.71667 × 109 cells/m3, with a biomass from 0.4 Factors in the Variability of the to 15.81 g/m3.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: an Updated Checklist
    diversity Review Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: An Updated Checklist S. S. S. Sarma 1,* , Marco Antonio Jiménez-Santos 2 and S. Nandini 1 1 Laboratory of Aquatic Zoology, FES Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Av. de Los Barrios No. 1, Tlalnepantla 54090, Mexico; [email protected] 2 Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-55-56231256 Abstract: A review of the Mexican rotifer species diversity is presented here. To date, 402 species of rotifers have been recorded from Mexico, besides a few infraspecific taxa such as subspecies and varieties. The rotifers from Mexico represent 27 families and 75 genera. Molecular analysis showed about 20 cryptic taxa from species complexes. The genera Lecane, Trichocerca, Brachionus, Lepadella, Cephalodella, Keratella, Ptygura, and Notommata accounted for more than 50% of all species recorded from the Mexican territory. The diversity of rotifers from the different states of Mexico was highly heterogeneous. Only five federal entities (the State of Mexico, Michoacán, Veracruz, Mexico City, Aguascalientes, and Quintana Roo) had more than 100 species. Extrapolation of rotifer species recorded from Mexico indicated the possible occurrence of more than 600 species in Mexican water bodies, hence more sampling effort is needed. In the current review, we also comment on the importance of seasonal sampling in enhancing the species richness and detecting exotic rotifer taxa in Mexico. Keywords: rotifera; distribution; checklist; taxonomy Citation: Sarma, S.S.S.; Jiménez-Santos, M.A.; Nandini, S. Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biodiverse Rotifer Assemblages (Rotifera: Eurotatoria) of Arunachal Pradesh, the Eastern Himalayas: Alpha Diversity, Distribution and Interesting Features
    Bonn zoological Bulletin 68 (1): 1–12 ISSN 2190–7307 2019 · Sharma B.K. & Sharma S. http://www.zoologicalbulletin.de https://doi.org/10.20363/BZB-2019.68.1.001 Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:839E82AA-0807-47C1-B21E-C5DE2098C146 The biodiverse rotifer assemblages (Rotifera: Eurotatoria) of Arunachal Pradesh, the eastern Himalayas: alpha diversity, distribution and interesting features Bhushan Kumar Sharma1, * & Sumita Sharma2 1, 2 Department of Zoology, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong – 793 022, Meghalaya, India * Corresponding author: Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:FD069583-6E71-46D6-8F45-90A87F35BEFE 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:668E0FE0-C474-4D0D-9339-F01ADFD239D1 Abstract. The present assessment of Rotifera biodiversity of the eastern Himalayas reveals a total of 172 species belonging to 39 genera and 19 families from Arunachal Pradesh, the northeastern-most state of India. The richness forms ~59% and ~40% of the rotifer species known till date from northeast India (NEI) and India, respectively. Three species are new to the Indian sub-region, four species are new to NEI and 89 species are new to Arunachal Pradesh; 27 species indicate global distribution importance and 25 species reported exclusively from NEI merit regional interest. The rich and diverse alpha di- versity and biogeographic interest of Rotifera of this Himalayan biodiversity hot-spot is noteworthy in light of predominance of the small lentic ecosystems. Lecanidae > Brachionidae > Lepadellidae > Trichocercidae collectively comprise ~71% of total rotifer species. Brachionidae records the highest richness known from any state of India. This study indicates the role of thermophiles with overall importance of ‘tropic-centered’ genera Lecane and Brachionus, and particularly at lower altitudes; species of ‘temperate-centered’ genera Keratella, Notholca and Synchaeta are notable in our collections at middle and higher altitudes, while Trichocerca and Lepadella are other species-rich genera.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biogeographical Analysis of Rotifers of the Genus Trichocerca Lamarck, 1801 (Trichocercidae, Monogononta, Rotifera), with Notes on Taxonomy
    Hydrobiologia 500: 103–114, 2003. K. Martens (ed.), Aquatic Biodiversity. 103 © 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. A biogeographical analysis of rotifers of the genus Trichocerca Lamarck, 1801 (Trichocercidae, Monogononta, Rotifera), with notes on taxonomy Hendrik Segers Freshwater Biology, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium E-mail: [email protected] Received 25 February 2003; in revised form 9 April 2003; accepted 9 April 2003 Key words: biogeography, Rotifera, North America, Trichocerca, T. maior, taxonomy Abstract An analysis of distribution patterns reveals a unique group of Nearctic endemics in Trichocerca Lamarck, 1801. This group, comprising 13.4% of all taxa analysed in the genus, is of diverse origin. A glacial origin is postulated for one species. The observed biogeographic pattern of eight others, and possibly two New World taxa, suggests a pre-Pleistocene origin followed by differential extinctions during glaciations in the Nearctic and Palaearctic. In general, endemism in Trichocerca is strongly biased towards the Northern hemisphere, with no endemism in tropical regions. This suggests a Laurasian origin of the genus. The analysis further reveals a majority (65.7%) of widely distributed taxa, with strict cosmopolitanism in more than a third of the species analysed. Latitudinal variation is evident in 26.9% of Trichocerca, and a warm-water preference appears to be indicated for a majority of these. Although the results should be interpreted with caution due to confused taxonomy, a Southern hemisphere, warm-water and Northern hemisphere, cold water component appear to be present. Comments on the taxonomy and distribution of several species are provided, along with illustrations of poorly known species.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Rotifers of High Mountain Lakes in the Eastern Black Sea Range of Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2017) 41: 674-685 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1602-32 Distribution of rotifers of high mountain lakes in the Eastern Black Sea Range of Turkey Didem ÖZDEMİR MİS, Mustafa Ruşen USTAOĞLU* Section of Limnology, Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey Received: 16.02.2016 Accepted/Published Online: 27.01.2017 Final Version: 17.07.2017 Abstract: Six expeditions were conducted in 2005–2007 on the rotifer fauna of 59 high mountain lakes of the Eastern Black Sea Range. All of the lakes are located at altitudes between 2530 and 3370 m except Uzungöl (1100 m). A total of 63 rotifer taxa were identified. All of the taxa that were identified are new records for their localities except Notholca squamula and Cephalodella gibba. Dissotrocha macrostyla, Hexarthra jenkinae, Lecane clara, Lecane kluchor, and Lecane latissima are new records for the Turkish inland water fauna. The trophic classification based on the orthophosphate includes 22 lakes as ultraoligotrophic and 37 lakes as oligotrophic; by Secchi depth, 20 lakes are ultraoligotrophic, 12 lakes oligotrophic, and 27 lakes mesotrophic. Rotifer species richness showed a decrease with altitude (20 species in Lake Uzungöl with an altitude of 1100 m and 4 species in Lake Deniz with an altitude of 3370 m). We propose that 80% of the rotifer taxa were indicators of oligotrophic conditions and the remaining 20% were indicators of mesotrophic conditions. Key words: Zooplankton, biodiversity, eutrophication, Kaçkar Mountain, glacial lakes 1. Introduction the elevation, we find alpine lakes at all latitudes; they Turkey is a natural museum, with a harmonious geography are comparable worldwide and have many common containing a wide variety of topographical structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum Rotifera, Species-Group Names Established Before 1 January 2000
    List of Available Names in Zoology, Candidate Part Phylum Rotifera, species-group names established before 1 January 2000 1) Completely defined names (A-list) compiled by Christian D. Jersabek Willem H. De Smet Claus Hinz Diego Fontaneto Charles G. Hussey Evangelia Michaloudi Robert L. Wallace Hendrik Segers Final version, 11 April 2018 Acronym Repository with name-bearing rotifer types AM Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia AMNH American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA BLND Biology Laboratory, Nihon Daigaku, Saitama, Japan BM Brunei Museum (Natural History Section), Darussalam, Brunei CHRIST Christ College, Irinjalakuda, Kerala, India CMN Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Canada CMNZ Canterbury Museum, Christchurch, New Zealand CPHERI Central Public Health Engineering Research Institute (Zoology Division), Nagpur, India CRUB Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina EAS-VLS Estonian Academy of Sciences, Vörtsjärv Limnological Station, Estonia ECOSUR El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Chetumal, Quintana Roo State, Mexico FNU Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China HRBNU Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China IBVV Papanin Institute of the Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, Russia IHB-CAS Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China IMC Indian Museum, Calcutta, India INALI Instituto National de Limnologia, Santo Tome, Argentina INPA Instituto Nacional de
    [Show full text]
  • A Modern Approach to Rotiferan Phylogeny: Combining Morphological and Molecular Data
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40 (2006) 585–608 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A modern approach to rotiferan phylogeny: Combining morphological and molecular data Martin V. Sørensen ¤, Gonzalo Giribet Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Received 30 November 2005; revised 6 March 2006; accepted 3 April 2006 Available online 6 April 2006 Abstract The phylogeny of selected members of the phylum Rotifera is examined based on analyses under parsimony direct optimization and Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Species of the higher metazoan lineages Acanthocephala, Micrognathozoa, Cycliophora, and potential outgroups are included to test rotiferan monophyly. The data include 74 morphological characters combined with DNA sequence data from four molecular loci, including the nuclear 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA, histone H3, and the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I. The combined molecular and total evidence analyses support the inclusion of Acanthocephala as a rotiferan ingroup, but do not sup- port the inclusion of Micrognathozoa and Cycliophora. Within Rotifera, the monophyletic Monogononta is sister group to a clade con- sisting of Acanthocephala, Seisonidea, and Bdelloidea—for which we propose the name Hemirotifera. We also formally propose the inclusion of Acanthocephala within Rotifera, but maintaining the name Rotifera for the new expanded phylum. Within Monogononta, Gnesiotrocha and Ploima are also supported by the data. The relationships within Ploima remain unstable to parameter variation or to the method of phylogeny reconstruction and poorly supported, and the analyses showed that monophyly was questionable for the fami- lies Dicranophoridae, Notommatidae, and Brachionidae, and for the genus Proales.
    [Show full text]