"Lake Sacramento" — Can It Happen Again?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

"LAKE SACRAMENTO" - Can It Happen Again? ~__ K srrREl'~T IN T'HE '62 FLOO Leon Hunsaker with Claude Curran "LAKE SACRAMENTO" - Can It Happen Again? Printed by COpy QUIK & ACADEMY PRINTING GRANTS PASS, OREGON Copyright© November 2005 Foreward We are two old men with something to say and not much time left to say it. We have tackled a project that is twice the magnitude of our combined weights (which is considerable)! You may be disappointed that we don't have a standard bibliography -- for this we apologize. However, we do have references to back up what we say and have included a num­ ber of supplements to keep our story flowing. If you'd care to spend 3,4,5, $6 --- (who knows how much) a gallon for gas and drive to Southern Oregon, we'll be happy to show you our backup material. Don't wait too long. Our eyesight is still OK but our hearing is fading fast! Biographical Sketch: Leon Hunsaker (11/1/05) 1. Born in Deweyville, Utah May 6, 1923 2. Graduated from Bear River High School in Garland, Utah in 1941 3. Married Margaret Worlton of Lehi, Utah in Logan, Utah June 10, 1947 4. Four Children (Claudia, Martin, Elizabeth and Arthur), 17 Grandchildren and 4 Great Grandchildren 5. WWII: Bomber Pilot and combat crew training -- flew both B-17s & B-29s 6. B.S. Degree "Aeronautics" --- St. Louis University 7. M.S. Degree "Meteorology" --- M.I.T. 8. Chief Meteorologist --- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (San Francisco) 9. Associate Professor --- California State University (Sonoma) 10. T.v. Meteorologist --- KPIX Ch.#5 (San Francisco), KTVL Ch.#10 & KOBI Ch.#5 in Medford, Oregon 11. Founded Jet Stream Weather in 1979 (supplied weather forecasts to a network of radio stations in Oregon, Northern Calif. & Wyoming) 12. Still have a 7: 15 A.M. Weathercast (Mon. thru Fri.) on KDOV-FM radio in Medford, Oregon Claude W. Curran Ph.D. I was born in Oakdale, California on October 6, 1938, where I lived the first six years of my life. In 1944 my family moved from there to Sonora, California. In the Fall of 1948 we moved to Paradise, California where I graduated from Paradise Elementary School in 1953. In October 1953 we moved to Corning, where I graduated from Corning Union High School in 1956. My wife Gib (Gwendolyn) and I were married in Durham, California in 1962. We have three marvelous daughters (two of whom are married), and seven beautiful grandchildren. I earned a BS in Social Science from California State University, Chico, in Chico, California in 1961: and MS (1963) and Ph.D. (1973) in Geography from the University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. I taught one semester at Sacramento State University, Sacramento, California in 1964; one year at California State University, Chico (1968 - 1969); and, a total of 36 years at Southern Oregon University in Ashland, Oregon. To: OUf families -- especially OUf wives Gwendolyn and Margaret AND Mr. Don Bradshaw pointing out the December 1955 high wa er mark. The 2" x 4" nailed to the tree is at the 110.6' mark on the gauge at Fordyce. (10-6-59) Thank you Brad - You made it possible! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Claude Many people were very helpful in aiding us find the information we needed. In all instances people exceeded our expectations and for that we are extremely grateful. However, these folks are in no way responsible for any errors in fact or judgment; those are ours alone. Our heartfelt thanks are offered to the following people: Jim Goodridge, State Climatologist (Retired); Maurice Roos, Chief Hydrologist, California Department of Water Resources (Retired); Thomas C. Haltom, GIS AnalystlPublic Information Officer, USGS; Rick Weaver, HydrologistiOSC, Tahoe National Forest; Randal Osterhuber, Central Sierra Snow Laboratory, UC Berkeley; "Martha", Nevada County Library, Grass Valley, California; Nicole Claffy, Librarian, California State Library, Sacramento, California and to Mark McLaughlin, Weather HistorianlWriterlPublisher. To my wife Gwen, for so graciously giving up the dining room table and the space I needed for a makeshift cartography laboratory. Leon The Roskelley Brothers (my grandsons) Jared, Jacob and Jordan. 1. Jared for his website design and installation on the Internet. His computer skills were also uti­ lized to extract streamflow data found on the Internet. 2. Jordan for his initial assistance in developing the graphs. 3. Jacob for a "bang up job" in completing all of the computer generated graphs and other visuals needed for this report. Jeanette Dickson gave us a major boost. Her unique organizational skills were greatly appreciated. Both Claude and I were impressed with how quickly she analyzed what needed to be done. Her timely com­ ments and observations brought all of the loose ends together. Not an easy task when you are dealing with two old men! Mark Hastings for expert computer advice. John Torrens and his retired PG&E Company friends for their willingness to help locate vital information. Redge Heth for calling our attention to press releases dealing with levee maintenance problems and poten--: tial flooding in the Sacramento Valley. To my family for their support and encouragement. We especially want to thank my daughter Claudia for making the facilities and personnel of Copy Quik and Academy Printing available for this project. Final1y to Ann Whipple of the Book Club of California for giving us permission to use the photo of K Street in Sacramento during the flood of 1862. This picture from the book "A Camera In The Gold Rush, Part II Sacramento Flood Pictures And Text" by Robert Vance. CONTENTS PREFACE..................................................................................................................................................... ...........Page 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER I - A Brief History of Early Floods............................................................................................ 11 CHAPTER II - The Search for Information..................................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER III - Yuba Watershed Now Profiles Prior to 1861-62 Flood Events.............................................. 23 DIAGRAM A - Stream Basin Model.............................................................................................................. 25 CHAPTER IV - Main Factors Contributing to Runoff..................................................................................... 27 CHAPTER V - Information Used in Estimating Stream Flows 1861-62......................................................... 31 CHAPTER VI - Flood Classification Model with Estimated Return Periods................................................... 37 CHAPTER VII - High Water Events Yuba Watershed & Vicinity 1863-1903.................................................. 45 TABLE VII-A - Analyses of Significant High Water Events 1863-1903 ....................................................... 47 CHAPTER VIII - YES!....................................................................................................................................... 49 SUPPLEMENT 1 - Newspaper Accounts of High Water 1861-62......................................................................... 55 SUPPLEMENT 1A- Information Used to Estimate Snow Cover on the Yuba Watershed December 5, 1861........ 61 SUPPLEMENT 1B- Information Used to Estimate Snow Cover on the Yuba Watershed January 7, 1862............. 67 SUPPLEMENT 1C- Information Used to Estimate Snow Cover on the Yuba Watershed January 18,1862............ 71 SUPPLEMENT 2 - Evidence of Record Flood Along Russian River, Early January 1862.................................... 75 SUPPLEMENT 3 - Heavy Snow at Low Elevations, January 5 & 6, 1862............................................................. 81 SUPPLEMENT 4 - Below Freezing Temperatures Prior to Snow Storm of January 5 & 6, 1862........................... 85 DIAGRAM B - Sacramento River Oscillation Chart 1849-1862 .................................................................... 89 SUPPLEMENT 5A- Does the Flood of December 1867 Qualify as a Chapter VI Scenario #4 Flood Event?.......... 91 SUPPLEMENT 5B- Does the Flood of January 1875 Qualify as a Chapter VI Scenario #4 Flood Event?............... 95 SUPPLEMENT 5C- Does the Flood of February 1881 Qualify as a Chapter VI Scenario #4 Flood Event?............. 99 SUPPLEMENT 5D- Does the Flood of January 1896 Qualify as a Chapter VI Scenario #4 Flood Event?............... 103 SUPPLEMENT 6 - Estimated Return Periods for Scenario Floods.......................................................................... 105 APPENDIX PLATES Plate I - Northern California Plate II - Northern Sierra Nevada Plate III - Central California Plate IV - Yuba River Basin SNOW PROFILES Profile 1 - December 5, 1861 Profile 2 - January 7, 1862 Profile 3 - January 18, 1862 Profile 4 - March 15, 1907 Profile 5 - January 11, 1909 Profile 6 - December 19, 1955 Profile 7 - December 19, 1964 Profile 8 - February 15, 1986 Profile 9 - December-January 1996-97 FIGURES Figure 1 - Grass Valley Daily Precipitation, December-January 1861-62 Figure 2 - Sacramento Daily Precipitation Figure 3 - Sacramento Daily Mean Temperatures Figure 4 - Yuba Watershed - Relationship Between Grass Valley and Lake Spaulding Precipitation Figure 5 - Three Day Precipitation “Burst” Figure 6 - Yuba Watershed - Percent Covered by Snow 40 inches or Less in Depth Figure 7 - Yuba Watershed - Percent of
Recommended publications
  • Centennial Industrial Site Habitat Management Plan for Pine Hill Flannelbush

    Centennial Industrial Site Habitat Management Plan for Pine Hill Flannelbush

    Centennial Industrial Site Habitat Management Plan for Pine Hill Flannelbush Centennial Industrial Site Habitat Management Plan for the Pine Hill Flannelbush (Fremontodendron decumbens) Prepared for: Rise Grass Valley, Inc. PO Box 271 Grass Valley, CA 95945 Prepared by: Greg Matuzak, Principal Biologist Greg Matuzak Environmental Consulting LLC 471 Sutton Way, Suite #210 Grass Valley, CA 95945 Email: [email protected] November 2019 Centennial Industrial Site Habitat Management Plan for Pine Hill Flannelbush TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ iv Habitat Management Plan Summary ................................................................................ v 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Pine Hill Flannelbush USFW Recovery Plan ............................................................ 1-1 1.2 Centennial Industrial Site in Nevada County ....................................................... 1-2 1.3 Project Understanding ........................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Purpose of the Habitat Management Plan .......................................................... 1-4 2 SPECIES DESCRIPTION, IDENTIFICATION, DISTRIBUTION, AND ECOLOGY .................... 2-1 2.1 Description and Identification ............................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1
  • Notice of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 12/17

    Notice of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 12/17

    Case 19-10547 Doc 66 Filed 05/15/19 Entered 05/15/19 12:26:25 Page 1 of 2 Information to identify the case: Debtor Falcon V, L.L.C. EIN 81−4041725 Name United States Bankruptcy Court Middle District of Louisiana Date case filed for chapter 11 5/10/19 Case number: 19−10547 Official Form 309F (For Corporations or Partnerships) Notice of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 12/17 For the debtor listed above, a case has been filed under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. An order for relief has been entered. This notice has important information about the case for creditors, debtors, and trustees, including information about the meeting of creditors and deadlines. Read both pages carefully. The filing of the case imposed an automatic stay against most collection activities. This means that creditors generally may not take action to collect debts from the debtor or the debtor's property. For example, while the stay is in effect, creditors cannot sue, assert a deficiency, repossess property, or otherwise try to collect from the debtor. Creditors cannot demand repayment from the debtor by mail, phone, or otherwise. Creditors who violate the stay can be required to pay actual and punitive damages and attorney's fees. Confirmation of a chapter 11 plan may result in a discharge of debt. A creditor who wants to have a particular debt excepted from discharge may be required to file a complaint in the bankruptcy clerk's office within the deadline specified in this notice. (See line 11 below for more information.) To protect your rights, consult an attorney.
  • Assessor Book Boundaries National Parks : 1178 O § 1242 E ¦¨ GRAN S N 0322 D D AVE

    Assessor Book Boundaries National Parks : 1178 O § 1242 E ¦¨ GRAN S N 0322 D D AVE

    LEY S L P A Y E V INYO COUNTY R A S P R I E INYO COUNTY T20NR10E Jupiter Pioneer Copper Y Point of Point Queen N Mine Rocks L D Rob Roy Acme Omega Canyon A T20NR01E 0512 Mine H (historical) T20NR08E R Smith Mine Beck Kingston # Standard T20NR02E T20NR06E Sperry Rogers Mine Range Blackwater # T20NR11E 0485 # L T20NR03E T20NR05E T20NR07E Hills Western Spring Mine Excelsior A S # Mine Monarch I T19NR09EN Mine T20NR09E Number Two Red Hill # L # Talc Mine O # Mine T20NR04E Pleasanton Mine # # Horse N Mine # T25SR40E Searles L # F # Thief # Snow N L M#ine # I # T T19NR06EN Springs # Long S T19NR07EN T19NR08EN White I I Valley # #Moorehouse # U T Valley E #Mine Acme L E Mine Alexander Tecopa# Q E A Mine # G E Hills Pass S A Trona A# BootAh N Kingston # # Mine T25SR41E Trona Y S # Alexander A E T L C R T19NR12E V M V o L #Mine Cub Lee s # N t M Well N T25SR43E T25SR44E R T25SR46E A L O Argus T25SR45E T25SR47E L I T Argus Tank a S A # Sandora k # T19NR13E U Canyon I T19NR08EE T25SR42E A Mine G e H G Wingate S Sperry N Borosolvay # Pass I N N O # K K Virginia Lake N I L N # China # Sand View # Old Ibex T19NR10E 0486 Canyon Ann Mine Owlshead AT19NR03E Ibex A D U M O N T Mine O T19NR04E T Wash Pass T19NR06E H I L L S Lake M E # Mountains T Kingston D T L Ponga E T19NR09E Peak T19NR11E Mesquite E China # T19NR02E N L G # S # T19NR07E T19NR08E Crystal # # Mine P Valley N S South N T19NR05E Mesquite L I U O Lake Trona New York Mine Hills Owl Lake # # Mountains # TA 0520 E Rabbit Mesquite R O T Colorado N # SISKIYOU Searles E U.S.
  • A Policy Response to the Water Supply and Flood Control in Changing Climate

    A Policy Response to the Water Supply and Flood Control in Changing Climate

    Capstone Project A Policy Response to the Water Supply and Flood Control in Changing Climate Nataliia Zadorkina Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego June, 2016 1 Table of Contents: Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………… 3 Policy Brief………………………………………………………………………………. 5 References………………………………………………………………………………… 16 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………. 19 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CAPSTONE SUBJECT: The Policy Response to Water Supply and Flood Control in Changing Climate CAPSTONE DELIVERABLE: Policy Brief “Recommendations on executive actions on the water supply and flood control” AUDIENCE: California Department of Water Resources ALIGNMENT WITH CLIMATE SCEINCE & POLICY: climate science – the link between climate change and extreme weather events, the role of atmospheric rivers in water supply and flood control; policy – recommendations on supporting scientific research targeting fulfilling informational gaps which will foster more reliable weather forecasting with an ultimate goal to be prepared for uncertainties associated with climate change effect on water availability and, subsequently, on reservoir operations. APPLICATION: The project has a direct effect on policy associated with climate change adaptation. The findings to be presented on the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) meeting on June 16, 2016 in Santa Rosa, CA as well as on the Sonoma County Grape Growers board meeting in Petaluma, CA. In hindsight, what used to be a highly polarized topic within the scientific community, the consensus behind man-made climate change has become increasingly uniform. In 2014, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a ‘Fifth Assessment’ report citing “unequivocal” evidence of rising average air and ocean temperatures (Graphic 1). Graphic 1: Temperature and Precipitation at Santa Rosa, CA, from 1890 to 2014 (Data source: National Climatic Data Center, NOAA).
  • Bear Creek Watershed Assessment Report

    Bear Creek Watershed Assessment Report

    BEAR CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Prepared by: PO Box 8568 Truckee, California 96162 February 16, 2018 And Dr. Susan Lindstrom, PhD BEAR CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT – PLACER COUNTY – CALIFORNIA February 16, 2018 A REPORT PREPARED FOR: Truckee River Watershed Council PO Box 8568 Truckee, California 96161 (530) 550-8760 www.truckeeriverwc.org by Brian Hastings Balance Hydrologics Geomorphologist Matt Wacker HT Harvey and Associates Restoration Ecologist Reviewed by: David Shaw Balance Hydrologics Principal Hydrologist © 2018 Balance Hydrologics, Inc. Project Assignment: 217121 800 Bancroft Way, Suite 101 ~ Berkeley, California 94710-2251 ~ (510) 704-1000 ~ [email protected] Balance Hydrologics, Inc. i BEAR CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT – PLACER COUNTY – CALIFORNIA < This page intentionally left blank > ii Balance Hydrologics, Inc. BEAR CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT – PLACER COUNTY – CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Goals and Objectives 1 1.2 Structure of This Report 4 1.3 Acknowledgments 4 1.4 Work Conducted 5 2 BACKGROUND 6 2.1 Truckee River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) 6 2.2 Water Resource Regulations Specific to Bear Creek 7 3 WATERSHED SETTING 9 3.1 Watershed Geology 13 3.1.1 Bedrock Geology and Structure 17 3.1.2 Glaciation 18 3.2 Hydrologic Soil Groups 19 3.3 Hydrology and Climate 24 3.3.1 Hydrology 24 3.3.2 Climate 24 3.3.3 Climate Variability: Wet and Dry Periods 24 3.3.4 Climate Change 33 3.4 Bear Creek Water Quality 33 3.4.1 Review of Available Water Quality Data 33 3.5 Sediment Transport 39 3.6 Biological Resources 40 3.6.1 Land Cover and Vegetation Communities 40 3.6.2 Invasive Species 53 3.6.3 Wildfire 53 3.6.4 General Wildlife 57 3.6.5 Special-Status Species 59 3.7 Disturbance History 74 3.7.1 Livestock Grazing 74 3.7.2 Logging 74 3.7.3 Roads and Ski Area Development 76 4 WATERSHED CONDITION 81 4.1 Stream, Riparian, and Meadow Corridor Assessment 81 Balance Hydrologics, Inc.
  • 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality

    4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality

    Housing Element Rezone Implementation Program County of Nevada Environmental Impact Report 4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section evaluates potential hydrology and water quality impacts that could result from the Nevada County Housing Element Rezone. Mitigation measures for potential impacts are identified where applicable. Information in this section comes from County of Nevada GIS mapping analysis as well as existing federal, state, and local regulations. 4.10.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING CLIMATE Located on the western slope of the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range, Nevada County (County) enjoys a temperate climate with seasonal variations consisting of hot dry summers and cold wet winters. Average temperatures range from a low of 34 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) in January to a high of 91°F in July. Precipitation falls primarily from November to April in the form of both rain and snow with snow falling most winters. The majority of precipitation falls in December, January, and February. WATERSHEDS The proposed project areas lie within the Upper Bear and Upper Yuba subbasins. Both subbasins exist within the American River subregion, which consists of roughly 5,375 square miles and includes portions of six counties. More specifically, the project sites are located within three watersheds (Sites 1-9, 14, and 17 are in the Wolf Creek Watershed, Sites 10-13 are in the Deer Creek Watershed, and Sites 15, 16, and 18 are in the Middle Bear Watershed). The Upper Bear subbasin, which incorporates the Grass Valley area sites and the Lake of the Pines area sites, originates about 20 miles west of the crest of the Sierra Nevada in northern Placer County within the boundaries of the Tahoe National Forest.
  • Status Species Occurrences

    Status Species Occurrences

    S U G A R L O A F M OUNTAIN T RAIL Biological Resources Report Prepared for: Bear-Yuba Land Trust (BYLT) ATTN: Bill Haire 12183 South Auburn Road Grass Valley, CA 95949 Ph: (530) 272-5994 and City of Nevada City ATTN: Amy Wolfson 317 Broad Street Nevada City, CA 95959 Ph: (530) 265-2496 Prepared by: Chainey-Davis Biological Consulting ATTN: Carolyn Chainey-Davis 182 Grove Street Nevada City, CA 95959 Ph: (530) 205-6218 August 2018 Sugarloaf Mountain Trail — Biological Inventory C h a i n e y - Davis Biological Consulting SUMMARY This Biological Resources Report (BRR) includes an inventory and analysis of potential impacts to biological resources resulting from the construction and operation of the Sugarloaf Mountain Trail, a proposed 1.5-mile public recreational trail in Nevada City, California, on a 30-acre open space preserve owned by the City of Nevada City (APN 036-020-026). The trail would be constructed, managed, and maintained by the Bear-Yuba Land Trust, a private non-profit organization. The project would expand an existing small, primitive trail and construct a new segment of trail on Sugarloaf Mountain, just north of Nevada City. The trail begins near the intersection of State Route 49 and North Bloomfield Road and terminates on Sugarloaf Mountain. The proposed trail includes a quarter-mile segment on an easement through private land. The project drawings are provided in Appendix A. Trail tread width will vary from 36 to 48 inches, depending on location and physical constraints, and constructed using a mini excavator, chainsaws, and a variety of hand tools.
  • Geographic Classification, 2003. 577 Pp. Pdf Icon[PDF – 7.1

    Geographic Classification, 2003. 577 Pp. Pdf Icon[PDF – 7.1

    Instruction Manual Part 8 Vital Records, Geographic Classification, 2003 Vital Statistics Data Preparation U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, Maryland October, 2002 VITAL RECORDS GEOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION, 2003 This manual contains geographic codes used by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) in processing information from birth, death, and fetal death records. Included are (1) incorporated places identified by the U.S. Bureau of the Census in the 2000 Census of Population and Housing; (2) census designated places, formerly called unincorporated places, identified by the U.S. Bureau of the Census; (3) certain towns and townships; and (4) military installations identified by the Department of Defense and the U.S. Bureau of the Census. The geographic place of occurrence of the vital event is coded to the state and county or county equivalent level; the geographic place of residence is coded to at least the county level. Incorporated places of residence of 10,000 or more population and certain towns or townships defined as urban under special rules also have separate identifying codes. Specific geographic areas are represented by five-digit codes. The first two digits (1-54) identify the state, District of Columbia, or U.S. Possession. The last three digits refer to the county (701-999) or specified urban place (001-699). Information in this manual is presented in two sections for each state. Section I is to be used for classifying occurrence and residence when the reporting of the geographic location is complete.
  • Increasing Precipitation Volatility in Twenty-First-Century California

    Increasing Precipitation Volatility in Twenty-First-Century California

    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0140-y Increasing precipitation volatility in twenty-first- century California Daniel L. Swain 1,2*, Baird Langenbrunner3,4, J. David Neelin3 and Alex Hall3 Mediterranean climate regimes are particularly susceptible to rapid shifts between drought and flood—of which, California’s rapid transition from record multi-year dryness between 2012 and 2016 to extreme wetness during the 2016–2017 winter pro- vides a dramatic example. Projected future changes in such dry-to-wet events, however, remain inadequately quantified, which we investigate here using the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble of climate model simulations. Anthropogenic forcing is found to yield large twenty-first-century increases in the frequency of wet extremes, including a more than threefold increase in sub-seasonal events comparable to California’s ‘Great Flood of 1862’. Smaller but statistically robust increases in dry extremes are also apparent. As a consequence, a 25% to 100% increase in extreme dry-to-wet precipitation events is pro- jected, despite only modest changes in mean precipitation. Such hydrological cycle intensification would seriously challenge California’s existing water storage, conveyance and flood control infrastructure. editerranean climate regimes are renowned for their dis- however, has suggested an increased likelihood of wet years20–23 tinctively dry summers and relatively wet winters—a glob- and subsequent flood risk9,24 in California—which is consistent ally unusual combination1. Such climates generally occur with broader theoretical and model-based findings regarding the M 25 near the poleward fringe of descending air in the subtropics, where tendency towards increasing precipitation intensity in a warmer semi-permanent high-pressure systems bring stable conditions dur- (and therefore moister) atmosphere26,27.
  • Lithium Resources and Requirements by the Year 2000

    Lithium Resources and Requirements by the Year 2000

    Lithium Resources and Requirements by the Year 2000 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1005 Lithium Resources and Requirements by the Year 2000 JAMES D. VINE, Editor GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1005 A collection of papers presented at a symposium held in Golden, Colorado, January 22-24, 1976 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOMAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director First printing 1976 Second printing 1977 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Vine, James David, 1921- Lithium resources and requirements by the year 2000. (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1005) 1. Lithium ores-United States-Congresses. 2. Lithium-Congresses. I. Vine, James David, 1921- II. Title. HI. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1005. TN490.L5L57 553'.499 76-608206 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02887-5 CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction, by James D. Vine, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo ______________-_______-_-- — ------- —— —— ——— ---- 1 2. Battery research sponsored by the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, by Albert Landgrebe, Energy Research and De­ velopment Administration, Washington, D.C., and Paul A. Nelson, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill-__- —— -____.—————— 2 3. Battery systems for load-leveling and electric-vehicle application, near-term and advanced technology (abstract), by N. P. Yao and W. J. Walsh, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, 111___.__________________________________-___-_________ — ________ 5 4. Lithium requirements for high-energy lithium-aluminum/iron-sulfide batteries for load-leveling and electric-vehicle applications, by A.
  • Floods, Droughts, and Lawsuits: a Brief History of California Water Policy

    Floods, Droughts, and Lawsuits: a Brief History of California Water Policy

    1Floods, Droughts, and Lawsuits: A Brief History of California Water Policy MPI/GETTY IMAGES The history of California in the twentieth century is the story of a state inventing itself with water. William L. Kahrl, Water and Power, 1982 California’s water system might have been invented by a Soviet bureaucrat on an LSD trip. Peter Passell, “Economic Scene: Greening California,” New York Times, 1991 California has always faced water management challenges and always will. The state’s arid and semiarid climate, its ambitious and evolving economy, and its continually growing population have combined to make shortages and conflicting demands the norm. Over the past two centuries, California has tried to adapt to these challenges through major changes in water manage- ment. Institutions, laws, and technologies are now radically different from those brought by early settlers coming to California from more humid parts of the United States. These adaptations, and the political, economic, technologic, and social changes that spurred them on, have both alleviated and exacerbated the current conflicts in water management. This chapter summarizes the forces and events that shaped water man- agement in California, leading to today’s complex array of policies, laws, and infrastructure. These legacies form the foundation of California’s contemporary water system and will both guide and constrain the state’s future water choices.1 1. Much of the description in this chapter is derived from Norris Hundley Jr.’s outstanding book, The Great Thirst: Californians and Water: A History (Hundley 2001), Robert Kelley’s seminal history of floods in the Central Valley, Battling the Inland Sea (Kelley 1989), and Donald Pisani’s influential study of the rise of irrigated agriculture in California, From the Family Farm to Agribusiness: The Irrigation Crusade in California (Pisani 1984).
  • Design and Quantification of an Extreme Winter Storm Scenario for Emergency Preparedness and Planning Exercises in California

    Design and Quantification of an Extreme Winter Storm Scenario for Emergency Preparedness and Planning Exercises in California

    Nat Hazards (2012) 60:1085–1111 DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9894-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Design and quantification of an extreme winter storm scenario for emergency preparedness and planning exercises in California Michael D. Dettinger • F. Martin Ralph • Mimi Hughes • Tapash Das • Paul Neiman • Dale Cox • Gary Estes • David Reynolds • Robert Hartman • Daniel Cayan • Lucy Jones Received: 14 March 2011 / Accepted: 1 July 2011 / Published online: 13 July 2011 Ó The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The USGS Multihazards Project is working with numerous agencies to eval- uate and plan for hazards and damages that could be caused by extreme winter storms impacting California. Atmospheric and hydrological aspects of a hypothetical storm sce- nario have been quantified as a basis for estimation of human, infrastructure, economic, and environmental impacts for emergency-preparedness and flood-planning exercises. In order to ensure scientific defensibility and necessary levels of detail in the scenario description, selected historical storm episodes were concatentated to describe a rapid arrival of several major storms over the state, yielding precipitation totals and runoff rates beyond those occurring during the individual historical storms. This concatenation allowed the scenario designers to avoid arbitrary scalings and is based on historical occasions from the 19th and 20th Centuries when storms have stalled over the state and when extreme M. D. Dettinger (&) Á D. Cayan U.S. Geological Survey, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, USA e-mail: [email protected] F. Martin Ralph Á M. Hughes Á P. Neiman NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory/Physical Sciences Division, Boulder, CO, USA T.