DOCSLIB.ORG

Regulation of CDK1 Activity During the G1/S Transition in S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regulation of CDK1 Activity During the G1/S Transition in S University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS GSBS Dissertations and Theses Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences 2014-10-21 Regulation of CDK1 Activity during the G1/S Transition in S. cerevisiae through Specific Cyclin-Substrate Docking: A Dissertation Samyabrata Bhaduri University of Massachusetts Medical School Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss Part of the Biochemistry Commons, Cell Biology Commons, and the Molecular Biology Commons Repository Citation Bhaduri S. (2014). Regulation of CDK1 Activity during the G1/S Transition in S. cerevisiae through Specific Cyclin-Substrate Docking: A Dissertation. GSBS Dissertations and Theses. https://doi.org/10.13028/ M2130G. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss/871 This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in GSBS Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REGULATION OF CDK1 ACTIVITY DURING THE G1/S TRANSITION IN S. cerevisiae THROUGH SPECIFIC CYCLIN-SUBSTRATE DOCKING A Dissertation Presented By Samyabrata Bhaduri Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Massachusetts Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Worcester In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY October 21, 2014 Interdisciplinary Graduate Program iii REGULATION OF CDK1 ACTIVITY DURING THE G1/S TRANSITION IN S. cerevisiae THROUGH SPECIFIC CYCLIN-SUBSTRATE DOCKING A Dissertation Presented By Samyabrata Bhaduri The signatures of the Dissertation Committee signify completion and approval as to style and content of the Dissertation _____________________________________________ Peter Pryciak, Ph.D., Thesis Advisor _____________________________________________ Jennifer Benanti, Ph.D., Member of Committee _____________________________________________ Amy Gladfelter, Ph.D., Member of Committee _____________________________________________ Dannel McCollum, Ph.D., Member of Committee _____________________________________________ Eduardo Torres, Ph.D., Member of Committee The signature of the Chair of the Committee signifies that the written dissertation meets the requirements of the Dissertation Committee _____________________________________________ Nicholas Rhind, Ph.D., Chair of Committee The signature of the Dean of the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences signifies that the student has met all graduation requirements of the school _______________________________________________ Anthony Carruthers, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Interdisciplinary Graduate Program October 21, 2014 iv Acknowledgements I am deeply grateful to my parents who have always encouraged me to choose for myself and take risks. Everyday of my life, I try to imbibe their great values and use that in decision-making. I want to sincerely thank Peter for being an excellent mentor to me over so many years and for constantly helping me develop analytical and presentation skills. I will continue to learn from him for years to come. These last seven years would have been stale and lackluster, had it not been for the constant companionship of my beautiful wife, Seemin, who always knows how to make it right, aptly demonstrated by her latest creation, Zoya – our five month old daughter. I cannot even begin to describe how much more fun life has become after Zoya took over, so a big “thank you” to her. I want to specially thank Matt, my lab-mate, for not only helping me with countless experiments and writing, but also for being a patient friend and a source of American political history, religious guidance, cultural sensitivity, etc. My sincere thanks goes out to my other lab-mates over the years, Patty, Rachel and Brian for helping with experiments while carrying on lighthearted banter. I also thank the members of my TRAC and DEC Committees for their constant guidance over the years and Dr. Gladfelter for kindly agreeing to be my external examiner. A special thanks goes out to Param, Shubham and Sebastian from Dan’s lab for a variety of scientific and non-scientific help and discussions. I would also like to thank my extended family back home in India for a lot of things and the large Indian diaspora here that makes us feel at home away from home in the USA. v Abstract Several cell cycle events require specific forms of the cyclin-CDK complexes. It has been known for some time that cyclins not only contribute by activating the CDK but also by choosing substrates and/or specifying the location of the CDK holoenzyme. There are several examples of B-type cyclins identifying certain peptide motifs in their specific substrates through a conserved region in their structure. Such interactions were not known for the G1 class of cyclins, which are instrumental in helping the cell decide whether or not to commit to a new cell cycle, a function that is non-redundant with B-type cylins in budding yeast. In this dissertation, I have presented evidence that some G1 cyclins in budding yeast, Cln1/2, specifically identify substrates by interacting with a leucine-proline rich sequence different from the ones used by B-type cyclins. These “LP” type docking motifs determine cyclin specificity, promote phosphorylation of suboptimal CDK sites and multi-site phosphorylation of substrates both in vivo and in vitro. Subsequently, we have discovered the substrate-binding region in Cln2 and further showed that this region is highly conserved amongst a variety of fungal G1 cyclins from budding yeasts to molds and mushrooms, thus suggesting a conserved function across fungal evolution. Interestingly, this region is close to but not same as the one implicated in B-type cyclins to binding substrates. We discovered that the main effect of obliterating this interaction is to delay cell cycle entry in budding yeast, such that cells begin DNA replication and budding only at vi a larger than normal cell size, possibly resulting from incomplete multi-site phosphorylation of several key substrates. The docking-deficient Cln2 was also defective in promoting polarized bud morphogenesis. Quite interestingly, we found that a CDK inhibitor, Far1, could regulate the Cln2-CDK1 activity partly by inhibiting the Cln2-substrate interaction, thus demonstrating that docking interactions can be targets of regulation. Finally, by studying many fungal cyclins exogenously expressed in budding yeast, we discovered that some have the ability to make the CDK hyper-potent, which suggests that these cyclins confer special properties to the CDK. My work provides mechanistic clues for cyclin- specific events during the cell cycle, demonstrates the usefulness of synthetic strategies in problem solving and also possibly resolves long-standing uncertainties regarding functions of some cell cycle proteins. vii Table of Contents Title Page……………………………………………………………………………ii Signature Page……………………………………………………………………..iii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………...iv Abstract………………………………………………………………………………v List of Tables………………………………………………………………………...ix List of Figures………………………………………………………………………..x Preface………………………………………………………………………………xiii CHAPTER I: Introduction…………………………………………………………...1 CHAPTER II: Cyclin-specific docking motifs promote phosphorylation of yeast signaling proteins by G1/S Cdk complexes………………………………………37 Abstract……………………………………………………………………………...38 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………40 Results……………………………………………………………………………….43 Discussions…………………………………………………………………………81 Materials and Methods……………………………………………………………85 CHAPTER III: A conserved docking interface in the cyclin Cln2 controls multi-site substrate phosphorylation and ensures timely entry into the cell cycle………..93 Abstract………………………………………………………………………………94 viii Introduction…………………………………………………………………………95 Results……………………………………………………………………………….98 Discussions………………………………………………………………………..136 Materials and Methods…………………………………………………………...145 CHAPTER IV: Regulation of cyclin-substrate docking by a G1 arrest signaling pathway and the Cdk inhibitor Far1………………………………………………153 Abstract……………………………………………………………………………..154 Background and Results………………………………………………………...155 Discussions………………………………………………………………………...183 Materials and Methods……………………………………………………………188 CHAPTER V: Conservation of LP recognition in fungal G1 cyclins and unusual hyper-potency in some cyclins…………………………………………………….196 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………197 Results and Discussions…………………………………………………………201 Materials and Methods……………………………………………………………220 CHAPTER VI: Concluding remarks……………………………………………..223 CHAPTER VII: APPENDIX………………………………………………………...232 References…………………………………………………………………………..239 ix List of Tables Table 2.1. Yeast strains used in Chapter II Table 2.2. Plasmids used in Chapter II Table 3.1. Yeast strains used in Chapter III Table 3.2. Plasmids used in Chapter III Table 3.3 Oligonucleotide primers used for RT-qPCR analysis in Chapter III Table 4.1. Yeast strains used in Chapter IV Table 4.2. Plasmids used in Chapter IV Table 5.1. Cyclin gene deletion and their phenotypes Table 5.2. Yeast strains used in Chapter V Table 5.3. Plasmids used in Chapter V x List of Figures Figure 1.1. CDKs and their role in cell-cycle progression (Reproduced from Bardin and Amon, 2001) Figure 1.2. Positive feedback loops operating at G1/S transition Figure 2.1. Cyclin-specific phosphorylation of Ste5 and Ste20 regulatory domains Figure 2.2. A distal docking
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plasma Membrane/Cell Wall Perturbation Activates a Novel Cell Cycle Checkpoint During G1 in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
    Plasma membrane/cell wall perturbation activates a novel cell cycle checkpoint during G1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Keiko Konoa, Amr Al-Zainb, Lea Schroederb, Makoto Nakanishia, and Amy E. Ikuib,1 aDepartment of Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; and bDepartment of Biology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11210 Edited by Daniel J. Lew, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Douglas Koshland April 29, 2016 (received for review December 22, 2015) Cellular wound healing or the repair of plasma membrane/cell wall Start cells are committed to one cell cycle progression (10). G1 damage (plasma membrane damage) occurs frequently in nature. progression is triggered by the G1 cyclin Cln3/CDK complex, which Although various cellular perturbations, such as DNA damage, spindle phosphorylates and inactivates Whi5, an inhibitor of transcription misalignment, and impaired daughter cell formation, are monitored factor Swi4/Swi6 (SBF) (11). SBF and MBF, an additional tran- by cell cycle checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast, whether scription factor complex, then activate the transcription of two ad- plasma membrane damage is monitored by any of these checkpoints ditional G1 cyclins, Cln1 and Cln2 (10, 12). Cln1 and Cln2 compose remains to be addressed. Here, we define the mechanism by which a positive feedback circuit via the activation of transcription factors cells sense membrane damage and inhibit DNA replication. We found SBF and MBF (13, 14), triggering a genome-wide transcriptional that the inhibition of DNA replication upon plasma membrane change that promotes the G1/S transition (15, 16).
    [Show full text]
  • Design Principles of the Yeast G1/S Switch
    Design Principles of the Yeast G1/S Switch Xiaojing Yang1,2., Kai-Yeung Lau2.¤, Volkan Sevim2., Chao Tang1* 1 Center for Quantitative Biology and Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China, 2 Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, and Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America Abstract A hallmark of the G1/S transition in budding yeast cell cycle is the proteolytic degradation of the B-type cyclin-Cdk stoichiometric inhibitor Sic1. Deleting SIC1 or altering Sic1 degradation dynamics increases genomic instability. Certain key facts about the parts of the G1/S circuitry are established: phosphorylation of Sic1 on multiple sites is necessary for its destruction, and both the upstream kinase Cln1/2-Cdk1 and the downstream kinase Clb5/6-Cdk1 can phosphorylate Sic1 in vitro with varied specificity, cooperativity, and processivity. However, how the system works as a whole is still controversial due to discrepancies between in vitro, in vivo, and theoretical studies. Here, by monitoring Sic1 destruction in real time in individual cells under various perturbations to the system, we provide a clear picture of how the circuitry functions as a switch in vivo. We show that Cln1/2-Cdk1 sets the proper timing of Sic1 destruction, but does not contribute to its destruction speed; thus, it acts only as a trigger. Sic1’s inhibition target Clb5/6-Cdk1 controls the speed of Sic1 destruction through a double-negative feedback loop, ensuring a robust all-or-none transition for Clb5/6-Cdk1 activity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the degradation of a single-phosphosite mutant of Sic1 is rapid and switch-like, just as the wild-type form.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Division Mode Plasticity by Cell Density in Marine-Derived
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.16.444389; this version posted May 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Growth and division mode plasticity by cell density in marine- 2 derived black yeasts 3 Gohta Goshima1,2 4 5 1 Sugashima Marine Biological Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya 6 University, Sugashima, 429-63, Toba 517-0004, Japan 7 2 Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo- 8 cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan 9 Email: [email protected]; Phone: +81 599-34-2216 10 11 12 Abstract 13 The diversity and ecological contribution of the fungus kingdom in the marine 14 environment remain under-studied. A recent survey in the Atlantic (Woods Hole, MA, 15 USA) brought to light the diversity and unique biological features of marine fungi. The 16 study revealed that black yeast species undergo an unconventional cell division cycle, 17 which has not been documented in conventional model yeast species such as 18 Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission 19 yeast). The prevalence of this unusual property is unknown. Inspired by the findings in 20 Woods Hole, I collected and identified >50 marine fungi species across 40 genera from 21 the ocean surface, sediment, and macroalgal surface in the Pacific (Sugashima, Toba, 22 Japan). The Sugashima collection largely did not overlap with the Woods Hole collection 23 and included several unidentifiable species, further illustrating the diversity of marine 24 fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology And
    OCTOBER 2, 2014 CONTACT US DIRECTIONS TO MBL HOME ABOUT MBL EDUCATION RESEARCH GIVING MBL NEWS HOME Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution RESOURCES HIGHLIGHTS RESEARCH Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution Eugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology & Tissue Engineering Cellular Dynamics Program The Ecosystems Center Program in Sensory Physiology and Behavior Whitman Center for Research and Discovery EDUCATION MBLWHOI LIBRARY GIFTS PEOPLE In the Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, scientists explore the evolution and interaction of genomes of diverse organisms with significant roles in environmental biology and human health. Bay Paul Center scientists integrate the powerful tools of genome science, molecular phylogenetics, and molecular ecology to advance our understanding of how living organisms are related to each other, to provide the tools to quantify and assess biodiversity, and to identify genes and metabolic processes of ecological and biomedical importance. Publications | Staff List © 1996-2014, The Marine Biological Laboratory MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY, MBL, and the Join the MBL community: 1888 logo are registered trademarks and service marks of The Marine Biological Laboratory. OCTOBER 2, 2014 CONTACT US DIRECTIONS TO MBL HOME ABOUT MBL EDUCATION RESEARCH GIVING MBL NEWS HOME Bay Paul Center Publications RESOURCES Akerman, NH; Butterfield, DA; and Huber, JA. 2013. Phylogenetic Diversity and Functional Gene Patterns of Sulfur- oxidizing Subseafloor Epsilonproteobacteria in Diffuse Hydrothermal Vent Fluids. Front Microbiol. 4, 185. HIGHLIGHTS RESEARCH Alliegro, MC; and Alliegro, MA. 2013. Localization of rRNA Transcribed Spacer Domains in the Nucleolinus and Maternal Procentrosomes of Surf Clam (Spisula) Oocytes.” RNA Biol.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclin Specificity: How Many Wheels Do You Need on a Unicycle?
    COMMENTARY 1811 Cyclin specificity: how many wheels do you need on a unicycle? Mary E. Miller and Frederick R. Cross* The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., New York, NY 10021, USA *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Journal of Cell Science 114, 1811-1820 © The Company of Biologists Ltd Summary Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity is essential for CDK to particular substrates or inhibitors. Such targeting eukaryotic cell cycle events. Multiple cyclins activate CDKs might occur through a combination of factors, including in all eukaryotes, but it is unclear whether multiple cyclins temporal expression, protein associations, and subcellular are really required for cell cycle progression. It has been localization. argued that cyclins may predominantly act as simple enzymatic activators of CDKs; in opposition to this idea, it has been argued that cyclins might target the activated Key words: Cyclin, CDK, Cell cycle, Targeting, Phosphorylation Introduction regulated cyclin expression. The mitotic B-type cyclins are The major events of the eukaryotic cell cycle depend on the degraded during or at the end of mitosis by the proteosome, sequential function of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs; after ubiquitination by the highly conserved anaphase- Levine and Cross, 1995). CDK catalytic activity is dependent promoting complex (APC; Irniger et al., 1995; King et al., upon physical association with cyclin regulatory subunits (De 1996; Zachariae et al., 1996). In budding yeast this control is Bondt et al., 1993; Jeffrey et al., 1995). In animals, multiple somewhat redundant with accumulation of the Sic1p inhibitor CDKs exist and are activated by multiple cyclins. The many of Clb-Cdc28p kinase activity (Schwab et al., 1997; Schwob different complexes make analysis in animal cells difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cell Senses Its Own Curves 28 April 2016
    A cell senses its own curves 28 April 2016 branches where curvature was highest. They then decided to recreate this natural phenomenon in the lab, using artificial materials they could measure more easily than living cells. Using precisely scaled glass beads coated with lipid membranes, they discovered that septin proteins preferred curves in the 1-3 micron range. They got the same result using human or fungal septins, suggesting that this phenomenon is evolutionarily conserved. "This ability of septins to sense micron-scaled cell curvature provides cells with a previously unknown mechanism for organizing themselves," Bridges says. The filamentous fungus Ashbya gossypii. The plasma The idea for the glass bead experiment came from membrane is visualized in magenta (FM-464), and the "many rich intellectual discussions with other septin Cdc11a-GFP is in green. Credit: Andrew Bridges members of the MBL community," says Bridges, who has accompanied Gladfelter to the MBL each summer since 2012. "Both our collaborations and the imaging resources at MBL were central to this Can a cell sense its own shape? Working in the work." Marine Biological Laboratory's Whitman Center, scientists from Dartmouth College developed an More information: Andrew A. Bridges et al, ingenious experiment to ask this question. Their Micron-scale plasma membrane curvature is conclusion - Yes - is detailed in a recent paper in recognized by the septin cytoskeleton, The Journal the Journal of Cell Biology. of Cell Biology (2016). DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201512029 "Cells adopt diverse shapes that are related to how they function. We wondered if cells have the ability to perceive their own shapes, specifically, the Provided by Marine Biological Laboratory curvature of the [cell] membrane," says Drew Bridges, a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Moreno-Torres Et Al
    OPEN Citation: Cell Discovery (2017) 3, 17012; doi:10.1038/celldisc.2017.12 ARTICLE www.nature.com/celldisc TORC1 coordinates the conversion of Sic1 from a target to an inhibitor of cyclin-CDK-Cks1 Marta Moreno-Torres1, Malika Jaquenoud, Marie-Pierre Péli-Gulli, Raffaele Nicastro, Claudio De Virgilio* Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland Eukaryotic cell cycle progression through G1–S is driven by hormonal and growth-related signals that are transmitted by the target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1) pathway. In yeast, inactivation of TORC1 restricts G1–S transition due to the rapid clearance of G1 cyclins (Cln) and the stabilization of the B-type cyclin (Clb) cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor Sic1. The latter mechanism remains mysterious but requires the phosphorylation of Sic1-Thr173 by Mpk1 and inactivation of the Sic1-pThr173-targeting phosphatase (PP2ACdc55) through greatwall kinase-activated endosulfines. Here we show that the Sic1-pThr173 residue serves as a specific docking site for the CDK phospho-acceptor subunit Cks1 that sequesters, together with a C-terminal Clb5-binding motif in Sic1, Clb5-CDK-Cks1 complexes, thereby preventing them from flagging Sic1 for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. Interestingly, this functional switch of Sic1 from a target to an inhibitor of cyclin-CDK-Cks1 also operates in proliferating cells and is coordinated by the greatwall kinase, which responds to both Cln-CDK-dependent cell-cycle and TORC1-mediated nutritional cues. Keywords: target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1); cyclin-dependent protein kinase (CDK); CDK inhibitor (CDKI); G1 cell cycle arrest; greatwall kinase pathway; Cks1; Sic1; Rim15 Cell Discovery (2017) 3, 17012; doi:10.1038/celldisc.2017.12; published online 2 May 2017 Introduction follows a temporal and spatial order that involves an initial Cln-CDK-dependent phosphorylation of Thr5 Eukaryotic cell proliferation requires proper and Thr33 within its N-terminal region [7].
    [Show full text]
  • SICI Is Ubiquitinated in Vitro by a Pathway That Requires CDC4, CDC34, and Cyclin/CDK Activities Rati Verma, R.M
    Molecular Biology of the Cell Vol. 8, 1427-1437, August 1997 SICI Is Ubiquitinated In Vitro by a Pathway that Requires CDC4, CDC34, and Cyclin/CDK Activities Rati Verma, R.M. Renny Feldman, and Raymond J. Deshaies* Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125 Submitted April 14, 1997; Accepted May 13, 1997 Monitoring Editor: Tim Hunt Traversal from G1 to S-phase in cycling cells of budding yeast is dependent on the destruction of the S-phase cyclin/CDK inhibitor SICL. Genetic data suggest that SIC1 proteolysis is mediated by the ubiquitin pathway and requires the action of CDC34, CDC4, CDC53, SKP1, and CLN/CDC28. As a first step in defining the functions of the corresponding gene products, we have reconstituted SICi multiubiquitination in DEAE- fractionated yeast extract. Multiubiquitination depends on cyclin/CDC28 protein kinase and the CDC34 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Ubiquitin chain formation is abrogated in cdc4t8 mutant extracts and assembly restored by the addition of exogenous CDC4, suggesting a direct role for this protein in SICi multiubiquitination. Deletion analysis of SICi indicates that the N-terminal 160 residues are both necessary and sufficient to serve as substrate for CDC34-dependent ubiquitination. The complementary C-terminal seg- ment of SICi binds to the S-phase cyclin CLB5, indicating a modular structure for SICL. INTRODUCTION tions suggest that CDC34, CDC4, and CDC53 promote the cell cycle-regulated destruction of SIC1, thereby The transition from G1 to S-phase in the budding yeast revealing the heretofore cryptic S-phase-promoting cell cycle requires several genetic functions, including protein kinase activity of CLB/CDC28.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Utility of the Optogenetic Toolbox for Cell Cycle Synchronization in Budding Yeast
    Master Thesis essay: Investigating the utility of the optogenetic toolbox for cell cycle synchronization in budding yeast 16 October 2019 Author: Mart Bartelds MSc Biomolecular Sciences Supervisor: Dr. Andreas Millias Argeitis Molecular Systems Biology group University of Groningen Abstract Cell division in eukaryotes is achieved via a conserved and tightly controlled protein network. In order to study processes that happen at specific stages during this division cycle it is important to have a culture with synchronized cells. Currently used synchronization methods often use the ‘arrest-and-release’ strategy, in which cells are arrested at a specific point in the cell cycle using chemicals or conditional mutants. Releasing the cells from the arresting conditions results in a synchronized re-entry to the cell cycle. However, these methods usually have severe side-effects on cell physiology and the switching between the restrictive and permissive state is slow. To overcome these limitations, optogenetic systems may be used, as these systems can offer exact molecular control over diverse cellular processes and switching between two states can be achieved rapidly. To identify potential targets for optogenetic control an overview is given of natural existing cell cycle arresting pathways. Two exiting optogenetic systems were identified that utilize these pathways. Since these systems were not designed for cell synchronization, ways to further improve these systems for cell synchronization were discussed. Moreover, two other pathways were identified that showed high potential for cell synchronization. Finally, two papers are discussed that developed systems for direct control of the expression or degradation of key regulators of the cell cycle. Although these systems can potentially invoke less severe side-effects, the arrest is less stringent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor Sic1 of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Is a Functional and Structural Homologous to the Mammalian P27kip1
    The Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor Sic1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Kip1 a Functional and Structural Homologous to the Mammalian p27 Matteo Barberis (1), Luca De Gioia (1), Maria Ruzzene (2), Stefania Sarno (2), Paola Coccetti (1), Lorenzo A. Pinna (2), Marco Vanoni (1), and Lilia Alberghina (1) (1) Department of Biotechnology and Bioscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 2, 20126 Milano – Italy e-mail: [email protected] (2) Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Padova, Viale G. Colombo 3, 35121 Padova – Italy Keywords. Functional homology, BIAcore, 3D modeling Introduction In budding yeast Sic1, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (Cki), blocks the activity of Cdk1-Clb5/6 (S-Cdk1) kinase required for the initiation of DNA replication that takes place only when Sic1 is removed [1]. Deletion of Sic1 causes premature DNA replication from fewer origins, extension of the S-phase and inefficient separation of sister chromatids during anaphase, whereas delaying S-Cdk1 activation rescues both S and M phase defects [2]. Despite the well documented relevance of Sic1 inhibition on S-Cdk1 for cell cycle control [3] and genome instability, the mechanism by which Sic1 inhibits S-Cdk1 activity remains obscure. Sic1 has been proposed to be a functional homologous of mammalian Cki p21Cip1 [4], that is characterized by a significant sequence similarity with Cki p27Kip1, inhibitor of the Cdk2/Cyclin A kinase activity during S-phase. Results In this paper we report that the inhibitory domain of Sic1 is structurally related to mammalian p27Kip1 of the Kip/Cip family, and that Sic1 and p27Kip1 are functional homologues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Cdks and Cdkis in Murine Development
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review The Role of CDKs and CDKIs in Murine Development Grace Jean Campbell , Emma Langdale Hands and Mathew Van de Pette * Epigenetic Mechanisms of Toxicology Lab, MRC Toxicology Unit, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK; [email protected] (G.J.C.); [email protected] (E.L.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 8 July 2020; Accepted: 26 July 2020; Published: 28 July 2020 Abstract: Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and their inhibitors (CDKIs) play pivotal roles in the regulation of the cell cycle. As a result of these functions, it may be extrapolated that they are essential for appropriate embryonic development. The twenty known mouse CDKs and eight CDKIs have been studied to varying degrees in the developing mouse, but only a handful of CDKs and a single CDKI have been shown to be absolutely required for murine embryonic development. What has become apparent, as more studies have shone light on these family members, is that in addition to their primary functional role in regulating the cell cycle, many of these genes are also controlling specific cell fates by directing differentiation in various tissues. Here we review the extensive mouse models that have been generated to study the functions of CDKs and CDKIs, and discuss their varying roles in murine embryonic development, with a particular focus on the brain, pancreas and fertility. Keywords: cyclin-dependent kinase; CDK inhibitors; mouse; development; knock-out models 1. Introduction Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are proteins that, by definition, require the binding of partner cyclin proteins in order to phosphorylate a series of target proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • A Yeast Synthetic Dosage Lethal Screen Identifies a Conserved
    Genetics: Early Online, published on August 24, 2016 as 10.1534/genetics.116.190231 1 A synthetic dosage lethal genetic interaction between CKS1B and PLK1 is 2 conserved in yeast and human cancer cells 3 Robert J.D. Reid1, Xing Du2, Ivana Sunjevaric1, Vinayak Rayannavar2, John Dittmar3,4, Eric 4 Bryant3, Matthew Maurer2, Rodney Rothstein1* 5 6 1 Dept Genetics & Development, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United 7 States of America 8 2 Dept of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of 9 America 10 3 Dept of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America 11 4Current address : Teladoc, Inc. 2 Manhattanville Rd, Purchase, NY United States of America 12 13 * Corresponding author 14 E-mail: [email protected] 15 1 Copyright 2016. 16 Abstract 17 The CKS1B gene located on chromosome 1q21 is frequently amplified in breast, lung and 18 liver cancers. CKS1B codes for a conserved regulatory subunit of cyclin-CDK complexes which 19 function at multiple stages of cell cycle progression. We used a high throughput screening 20 protocol to mimic cancer-related overexpression in a library of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 21 mutants to identify genes whose functions become essential only when CKS1 is overexpressed, 22 a synthetic dosage lethal (SDL) interaction. Mutations in multiple genes affecting mitotic entry 23 and mitotic exit are highly enriched in the set of SDL interactions. The interactions between 24 Cks1 and the mitotic entry checkpoint genes require the inhibitory activity of Swe1 on the 25 yeast cyclin dependent kinase (CDK), Cdc28.
    [Show full text]