DOCSLIB.ORG

Implementing the Prince2 Project Management Method in an Existing Project Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Implementing the Prince2 Project Management Method in an Existing Project Environment Masaryk University Faculty of Economics and Administration Field of Study: Business Management IMPLEMENTING THE PRINCE2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHOD IN AN EXISTING PROJECT ENVIRONMENT Master's Thesis Supervisor: Author: Tuck Lloyd Crawford Macrae, M. B.A. Liliia Demianchuk Brno, 2020 MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA Faculty of Economics and Administration MUNI Lipová 41a, 602 00 Brno IČ: 00216224 ECON DIČ: CZ00216224 Master's thesis description Academic year: 2019/2020 Student: Liliia Demianchuk Programme: Economy and Management Field of Study: Business Management (Eng.) Title of the thesis/dissertation: Implementing the PRINCE2 Project Management Method in an Existing Project Environment Title of the thesis in English: Implementing the PRINCE2 Project Management Method in an Existing Project Environment Thesis objective, procedure and methods used: This is a case study based thesis. It is the responsibility of the student to find a selection of appropriate companies on which to base the case study. The final selection must be appro- ved by the supervisor. Approach and methods used: 1. Bac- kground research which, at a minimum, addresses what is pro- ject management, what standard methods are available to or- ganisations, comparisons of the methods, waterfall and agile delivery methods and their impact on method implementation; 2. A thorough analysis of the project management policies, procedures, processes, and methods used by the company under study; 3. A comparison between the PRINCE2 method and the company’s policies, procedures, processes, and me- thods. 4. Findings and Recommendations covering, at a mini- mum, how PRINCE2 can be embedded into the organisation including actions required, timelines and costs, a complete ex- planation of the potential financial and non-financial benefits, and an analysis of the potential risks and possible risk miti- gation. Self-study and extensive research is required. The stu- dent is expected to expand well beyond the literature listed and demonstrate substantial additional learning. Extent of graphics-related work: According to thesis supervisor’s instructions Extent of thesis without supplements: 60 – 80 pages Literature: Agile contractscreating and managing successful projects with Scrum. Edited by Andreas Opelt. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2013. xiv, 282 p. ISBN 9781118640128. Directing Successful Projects with PRINCE2®. : Axelos, 2009. 166 s. ISBN 978-0-11-331060-9. Managing successful projects with Prince2. Sixth edition. Norwich: Axelos, 2017. 327 s. ISBN 978-0-11-331533-8. PRINCE2 Agile® Guidance. : Axelos, 2015. 360 s. ISBN 978-0-11-331467-6. Thesis supervisor: Tuck Lloyd Crawford MacRae, M. B.A. Thesis supervisor’s department: Department of Corporate Economy Faculty of Economics and Administration Page 1 of 2 Thesis assignment date: 2019/05/15 The deadline for the submission of Master’s thesis and uploading it into IS can be found in the academic year calendar. In Brno, date: 2020/05/09 Page 2 of 2 Name and surname of the author: Liliia Demianchuk Master's thesis title: Implementing the PRINCE2 Project Management method in an existing project environment Department: Business Management Master's thesis supervisor: Professor Tuck Lloyd Crawford Macrae M. B.A. Master's thesis date: 2020 Abstract This research is qualitative, empirical research, based on the case study of XYZ company, in particular, one of XYZ's development teams - the FI-CA team. The primary goal of the thesis is to test the hypothesis that PRINCE2 methodology can be tailored to the project environment of the analyzed company and combined with agile concepts, that positively affects existing procedures, policies, and processes, techniques of the FI-CA team. The tailoring of PRINCE2 methodology is considered in combination with Agile philosophy which is the foundation of XYZ's development and delivery concept, and partially implemented in the FI-CA team. The theoretical part of the thesis provides a comprehensive literature overview, particularly PRINCE2 and its integrated elements as well as the Agile framework, to form the theoretical foundation for the study. The practical part of the study comprises the analysis of XYZ as a whole and the process of project handling in the FI-CA team specifically. Thereafter, recommendations are comprehended based on the results of the PRINCE2 Agile Health Check with the summary of identified inconsistencies and flaws of the existing methodology used by the FI-CA team. Recommendations include improvement and deployment of existing agile practices that are compliant with the XYZ's transformation strategy, and tailoring the PRINCE2 framework to the unique environment and conditions of the FI-CA team. The last part with the evaluation of the performance of the FI-CA team and key benefits attained while using PRINCE2 Agile methodology proves the formulated hypothesis. Keywords: Project Management, PRINCE2 Methodology, Agile, Scrum, PRINCE2 Agile Methodology, the FI-CA team, development, software solutions. Declaration “I certify that I have written the Master’s Thesis “Implementing the PRINCE2 PM method in an existing project environment” by myself under the supervision of Tuck Lloyd Crawford Macrae, M. B.A.and I have listed all the literary and other specialist sources in accordance with legal regulations, Masaryk University internal regulations, and the internal procedural deeds of Masaryk University and the Faculty of Economics and Administration.” Brno, Liliia Demianchuk Acknowledgments Above all things, I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor and mentor, professor Tuck Macrae, for guiding, supporting and encouraging me throughout the study. Also, I am grateful for the chance to work on the topic directly linked to my work, which helped me to turn the theoretical research into a practice-oriented case study. Besides this, I am grateful for the opportunity to join the XYZ company, in particular the FI-CA team. I am thankful for the support, openness and professionalism of my colleagues. Last but not the least, I express my gratitude to my family and boyfriend that walked this whole way by my side and believed in me unconditionally. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 Theoretical overview................................................................................................................. 11 Project Management Methodology: emergence, evolution and current phase ..................... 11 Project Management Methodology: definition and comparison of the most recognized methodologies ....................................................................................................................... 17 PRINCE2 Agile Approach: complex solution suitable for the IT industry .......................... 30 Research Methodology ............................................................................................................. 36 Research Process ................................................................................................................... 36 Research object and research questions ................................................................................ 36 Literature Review .................................................................................................................. 37 Practice-oriented case-study .................................................................................................. 37 Research Hypothesis ............................................................................................................. 38 Data Collection...................................................................................................................... 38 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 40 Industry and Company Overview ............................................................................................. 41 Enterprise Software Industry Overview and Growth ............................................................ 41 Software Industry Trends .................................................................................................. 43 XYZ Company: Overview .................................................................................................... 44 XYZ's Overview and Financials ........................................................................................ 44 Organizational Landscape and Corporate Culture ............................................................ 47 GS FI and FI-CA Team: Overview and Structure ............................................................. 49 Project Management Overview ......................................................................................... 51 Analysis of the XYZ PM Approach ........................................................................................... 59 Health check – PRINCE2 Agile version ............................................................................... 59 Agile Behaviors ................................................................................................................. 60 Agile Environment ............................................................................................................ 61 Agile Process ..................................................................................................................... 62 Agile Techniques ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Marriage Proposal of PRINCE2™ and PMBOK®
    The Marriage Proposal of PRINCE2™ and PMBOK® Dr Anthony Yeong DBA MBA MAIPM PMP PRINCE2 Practitioner Nov 2009 Edition PRINCE2™ Age: 34 years old Nick Name: PRINCE2 Practitioner Birth Certificate: Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2™ Nationality: British Family: Office of Government Commerce (OGC) Father: Portfolio Management Guide (PfM) Mother: Managing Successful Programmes (MSP) PRINCE2™ stands for Project In Controlled Environment Version 2 and it is originated from Simpact Systems dated back to 1975. Simpact Systems has invented the proprietary project process called PROMPT and was partially adopted by the UK government as its preferred project management process. In 1989, UK government bought over PROMPT and have renamed it to PRINCE™ and placed it in the public domain. The UK government’s Central Computer and Telecommunications Agency (CCTA), now the Office of Government Commerce, (OGC) continued to develop PRINCE™ and has been evolved into newer version termed as PRINCE2™ and issued in 1996. OGC decided to keep the PRINCE2 name regardless of the future editions, ie there will not be PRINCE3 or 4 for newer versions. PRINCE2 has been adopted widely in UK and Europe and getting more recognition in Australia and other parts of the world. In 2005 an updated manual entitled, “Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2” is released. It is the fourth edition of the manual. The history of the manual is as followed: First Edition 1996 Second Edition 1998 Third Edition 2002 Fourth Edition 2005 Fifth Edition 2009 PRINCE2™ is made of seven principles themes, seven themes and seven processes. The Seven PRINCE2 Principles are: 1. Continued business justification: A PRINCE2 project has continued business justification.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of PRINCE2 Project Management Methodology1
    Studia commercialia Bratislavensia Volume 10; Number 38 (2/2017); pp. 227-238 DOI: 10.1515/stcb-2017-0021 ISSN 1339-3081 Application of PRINCE2 Project Management Methodology1 Radka Vaníčková2 Abstract The methodology describes the principle of setting a project in PRINCE2 project man- agement. The main aim of the paper is to implement PRINCE2 methodology to be used in an enterprise in the service industry. A partial aim is to choose a supplier of the project among new travel guides. The result of the project activity is a sight-seeing tour/service more attractive for customers in the tourism industry and a possible choice of new job opportunities. The added value of the article is the description of applying the principles, processes and topics of PRINCE2 project management so that they might be used in the field. Key words Small and medium-sized enterprises, services, tourism sector, life cycle of the project, project management, PRINCE2 methodology. JEL Classification: L 83, L 84, O 22. Introduction After joining the European Union, the business environment is characterized by a relatively high degree of openness of the economy, harmonization of national regulations with EU legislation, decreased income tax rates, a high level of employee protection (termination of employment), a limited capital market, a consolidated banking sector, rights, inflows of foreign investment, and improving choice of industrial green-field projects (Vochozka, Mulač a kol., 2012). As reported by Kovář, Hrazdilová and Bočková (2016), small and medium-sized enterprises account for almost 90 % of the total number of enterprises with a share of 50-70 % of total employment and a share of 30-70 % of GDP.
    [Show full text]
  • The Timeboxing Process Model for Iterative Software Development
    The Timeboxing Process Model for Iterative Software Development Pankaj Jalote Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur – 208016; India Aveejeet Palit, Priya Kurien Infosys Technologies Limited Electronics City Bangalore – 561 229; India Contact: [email protected] ABSTRACT In today’s business where speed is of essence, an iterative development approach that allows the functionality to be delivered in parts has become a necessity and an effective way to manage risks. In an iterative process, the development of a software system is done in increments, each increment forming of an iteration and resulting in a working system. A common iterative approach is to decide what should be developed in an iteration and then plan the iteration accordingly. A somewhat different iterative is approach is to time box different iterations. In this approach, the length of an iteration is fixed and what should be developed in an iteration is adjusted to fit the time box. Generally, the time boxed iterations are executed in sequence, with some overlap where feasible. In this paper we propose the timeboxing process model that takes the concept of time boxed iterations further by adding pipelining concepts to it for permitting overlapped execution of different iterations. In the timeboxing process model, each time boxed iteration is divided into equal length stages, each stage having a defined function and resulting in a clear work product that is handed over to the next stage. With this division into stages, pipelining concepts are employed to have multiple time boxes executing concurrently, leading to a reduction in the delivery time for product releases.
    [Show full text]
  • PRINCE2® Vs Agile: a Comparison
    PRINCE2® vs Agile: A comparison Author: Simon Buehring ® Copyright © 2015-2018 Knowledge Train. All rights reserved. | PRINCE2® is a registered trade mark of AXELOS Limited, used under permission of AXELOS Limited. All rights reserved. There's no doubt that PRINCE2 [1] is the most widely-recognized project management methodology in the world. PRINCE2 qualifications are a standard feature of project management job specifications and have been growing in popularity since PRINCE2’s launch in 1996. Currently, over 150,000 PRINCE2 exams are sat somewhere in the world every year. There remains a lot of confusion between PRINCE2 and agile [2], and indeed debate about whether PRINCE2 or agile methods should be used on projects. In fact, both can and are being used increasingly on projects – often together. This article will explore some of the key features of both PRINCE2 and agile and will dispel some of the myths as well. Differences between PRINCE2 and agile The most fundamental difference between PRINCE2 and agile is that the former is a project management methodology whereas agile refers to numerous software development approaches used by teams which subscribe to the 12 Agile principles. There are many different agile approaches, the most famous being Scrum, Kanban, Extreme Programming, and Lean. 1 Who is PRINCE2 aimed at? PRINCE2 is a customer-focused project management methodology. It offers a set of principles, themes and processes to enable an organization’s key managers to justify a project. It helps them understand “why should we do it (the project)?” and “are the benefits worth the costs and risks of doing the project?”.
    [Show full text]
  • Basics of Project Planning
    BASICS OF PROJECT PLANNING © Zilicus Solutions 2012 Contents The Basics of Project Planning ............................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What is Project Planning? ................................................................................................................ 3 Why do we need project planning? ................................................................................................. 3 Elements of project plan .................................................................................................................. 4 1. Project Scope Planning ...................................................................................................... 4 Triangular Constraints (TQR) ............................................................................................................ 5 2. Delivery Schedule Planning ............................................................................................... 5 3. Project Resources Planning ................................................................................................ 6 4. Project Cost Planning ......................................................................................................... 8 5. Project Quality Planning .................................................................................................... 9
    [Show full text]
  • Intro to BPC Logic Filter
    INTRODUCTION TO BPC LOGIC FILTER FOR MICROSOFT PROJECT Prepared For: General Release Prepared By: Thomas M. Boyle, PE, PMP, PSP BPC Project No. 15-001 First issue 29-May-15 (Updated 02-Dec-20) Boyle Project Consulting, PLLC 4236 Chandworth Rd. Charlotte, NC 28210 Phone: 704-916-6765 Project Management and Construction Support Services [email protected] Introduction to – BPC Logic Filter for Microsoft Project 02-Dec-20 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND / MOTIVATION ...................................................................................... 1 2.1 HISTORY ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 NEEDS ....................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................ 2 3.1 FEATURE DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................................... 2 3.2 SHARING THE TOOLS .............................................................................................................. 12 4.0 USER APPLICATIONS AND SETTINGS ....................................................................... 12 5.0 SOFTWARE EDITIONS AND LICENSING ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 5 – Project Planning
    Unit 5 – Project Planning UNIT OVERVIEW Description of the Unit In this unit, you will explore the necessity of proper project planning and how ‘front end’ planning can ensure project success. You will look at several scenarios that put a structure around project scope, deliverables, scheduling, staffing, resources, and risks to help anchor the planning process. Unit Objectives At the conclusion of this unit, you will be able to: • Understand the necessity of a project plan • Assess resource and budgeting issues • Analyze project risks • Effectively determine project scope • Identify project deliverables Unit Topics • Project schedules based on work breakdown structures • Project resources and schedules based on staff availability • Project budgets • Managing project risks • Triple constraint to achieve project goals Activities and Exercises • Group Exercise 5A: Project Management Scenarios • Group Exercise 5B: Review Project Plans for Unit 3 Scenarios Approximate Time for Unit 1 hour 45 minutes Managing Technology Projects and Technology Resources Participant Guide 5 - 1 Institute for Court Management Unit 5 – Project Planning Managing Technology Projects and Technology Resources Participant Guide 5 - 2 Institute for Court Management Unit 5 – Project Planning ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ UNIT 5 ___________________________________ Project Planning ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ©2010
    [Show full text]
  • PRINCE2 Agile Slides
    How to use PRINCE2® with agile ways of working “© Copyright AXELOS Limited 2015. “PRINCE2 Agile™ is a trade mark of AXELOS Limited. All rights reserved.” Course Objectives 1.Understand the basic concepts of common agile ways of working 2.Understand the purpose and context for combining PRINCE2 and the agile way of working 3.Be able to apply and evaluate the focus areas to a project in an agile context 4.Be able to fix and flex the six aspects of a project in an agile context 5.Be able to apply or tailor the PRINCE2 principles, themes, processes and management products to a project in an agile context 6.To learn through the use of theory and practical exercises 7.To prepare delegates for the PRINCE2 Agile Practitioner exam About yourself 1. Name (and company) 2. Role 3. Experience of PRINCE2 4. Experience of agile 5. Your objective for this course About the manual • Aligned to the PRINCE2 manual • Early chapters – Basic understandings and drivers for PRINCE2 Agile. • Middle chapters – Discussion and description of the Principles, Themes, Processes and Products – What you may find – What to do. • Final chapters – Focus areas – where PRINCE2 needs more detailed guidance when in an agile context – The appendices. Exam structure • 2.5 hour exam • Open book • Objective Testing Exam • Taken on the afternoon of the third day • 5 questions totalling 50 marks • Pass mark is TBC. Agenda for Day 1 • Projects and BAU • An overview of agile • Blending PRINCE2 and agile together • Assumptions • The Hexagon (incl. MoSCoW prioritisation) • Starting Up a Project, Initiating a Project (including the Business Case, value assessment and Cynefin approach) • Requirements and User Stories • Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Project Management Methodologies in Reducing Project Delays: Evidence from the Adentan Municipal Assembly in Ghana
    “Navigating Cyberspace for Socio-economic Transformation and Redefining Management in Light of Digital Economy.” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Management and Economics – 2019 The Use of Project Management Methodologies in Reducing Project Delays: Evidence from the Adentan Municipal Assembly in Ghana Nubuor S.A. a, Dartey-Baah K. b, and Kasanga N.A.B. c a,b,cDepartment of Organization and Human Resource Management, University of Ghana Business School, Legon, University of Ghana, Ghana. [email protected] Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of project management methodologies in the Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies in Ghana to reduce project delays. To achieve this objective, a case study was conducted in the Adentan Municipal Assembly to determine whether the Assembly is applying the best practices of project management in its projects, to identify the factors causing delay in projects and recommend possible project management solutions to these issues. Projects in Controlled Environment 2 (PRINCE2) and Critical Path Methodologies were employed as the conceptual frameworks for the study. Adopting an exploratory approach, interviews were used to sample the experiences of staff in managing their projects. The results of the investigation provided evidence of the use of project management practices by the Adentan Municipal Assembly in managing projects within their jurisdiction; however, the identified practices did not fall within the context of best practice as described in PRINCE2, and the Critical Path Methodologies. Furthermore, cost, time and scope management were identified as the main project management knowledge areas that were used by the Assembly to ensure the completion of projects as scheduled.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on PRINCE2 from an Agile Perspective 4-May-08
    Reflections on PRINCE2 from an Agile perspective 4-May-08 Reflections on PRINCE2 from an Agile perspective (c) Allan Kelly – www.allankelly.net Reflections on PRINCE2 from an Agile perspective...................................................1 Prologue.................................................................................................................2 Introduction............................................................................................................2 History and usage...................................................................................................2 Overview of PRINCE2...........................................................................................4 Eight components...............................................................................................4 Three Techniques ...............................................................................................8 Eight Processes...................................................................................................9 Other elements..................................................................................................12 Critique ................................................................................................................14 Projects – or Products and Programmes? ..........................................................14 Controlled Environments? ................................................................................15 More is less ......................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • 49R-06: Identifying the Critical Path 2 of 13
    49R-06 IDENTIFYING THE CRITICAL PATH SAMPLE AACE® International Recommended Practice No. 49R-06 IDENTIFYING THE CRITICAL PATH TCM Framework: 7.2 – Schedule Planning and Development 9.2 – Progress and Performance Measurement 10.1 – Project Performance Assessment 10.2 – Forecasting Rev. March 5, 2010 Note: As AACE International Recommended Practices evolve over time, please refer to www.aacei.org for the latest revisions. Contributors:SAMPLE Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by the authors and contributors to this recommended practice are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their employers, unless otherwise stated. Christopher W. Carson, PSP (Author) Paul Levin, PSP Ronald M. Winter, PSP (Author) John C. Livengood, PSP CFCC Abhimanyu Basu, PE PSP Steven Madsen Mark Boe, PE PSP Donald F. McDonald, Jr. PE CCE PSP Timothy T. Calvey, PE PSP William H. Novak, PSP John M. Craig, PSP Jeffery L. Ottesen, PE PSP CFCC Edward E. Douglas, III CCC PSP Hannah E. Schumacher, PSP Dennis R. Hanks, PE CCE L. Lee Schumacher, PSP Paul E. Harris, CCE James G. Zack, Jr. CFCC Sidney J. Hymes, CFCC Copyright © AACE® International AACE® International Recommended Practices AACE® International Recommended Practice No. 49R-06 IDENTIFYING THE CRITCAL PATH TCM Framework: 7.2 – Schedule Planning and Development 9.2 – Progress and Performance Measurement 10.1 – Project Performance Assessment 10.2 – Forecasting March 5, 2010 INTRODUCTION Purpose This recommended practice (RP) for Identifying the Critical Path is intended to serve as a guideline and a resource, not to establish a standard. As a recommended practice of AACE International it provides guidelines for the project scheduler when reviewing a network schedule to be able to determine the critical path and to understand the limitations and assumptions involved in a critical path assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning in Software Project Management
    PLANNING IN SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH OF SOFTWARE COMPANIES IN VIETNAM Thesis presented to the Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences at the University of Fribourg (Switzerland) in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Economics and Social Sciences by Quynh Mai NGUYEN from Vietnam Accepted by the Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences on May 30th, 2006 at the proposal of Professor Dr. Andreas Meier (first advisor) Professor Dr. Jacques Pasquier (second advisor) Professor Dr. Laurent Donzé (third advisor) Fribourg, Switzerland 2006 The Faculty of Economics and Soci al Sciences at the University of Fribourg neither approves nor disapproves the opinions expressed in a doctoral dissertati on. They are to be considered those of the author (decision of the Faculty Council of January 23rd, 1990). To my parents, and To Phuong and Trung, my children ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my extreme gratitude to Prof. Dr. Andreas Meier for his guidance, encouragement and helpful supervision during the process of this thesis. I would like to thank Prof. Jacques Pasquier and Prof. Laurent Donzé for their review and comments. My special thanks also go to Dr. Fredric William Swierczek for his invaluable help, advices and suggestions for improvement. Without their help and advice this dissertation could not be completed. I would like to thank my friends, Dr. Bui Nguyen Hung, and Dr. Nguyen Dac Hoa, Mrs. Nguyen Thuy Quynh Loan for their assistance and helpful suggestions and contributions. I would like to thank the government of Switzerland and the Swiss – AIT – Vietnam Management Development Program (SAV) for giving me the scholarship for this PhD program.
    [Show full text]