Part I A4 33-36

2015 s^{_phcn 24 Xncph\¥]pcw, hmeyw 4 24th February 2015 \º¿ sNm∆ 1190 Ipw`w 12 } 12th Kumbham 1190 8 Vol. IV Thiruvananthapuram, No. } 1936 ^m¬Kp\w 5 Tuesday 5th Phalguna 1936

PART I Notifications and Orders issued by the Government

Labour and Skills Department Union (CITU), Embichibava Smaraka Mandiram, Labour and Skills (A) Kunnummal, Malappuram-676 505 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

ORDERS And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for (1) adjudication;

G. O. (Rt.) No. 15/2015/LBR. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2015. 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour industrial dispute exists between Smt. Shaniba, Licencee, Court will pass the award within a period of three months. Vengara Gas Agencies (HP Gas Dealer), K. K. Road, Vengara, Vengara P. O., Malappuram-676 304 and ANNEXURE the workman of the above referred establishment Whether the denial of employment to Sri K. P. Anil Sri K. P. Anil, S/o. Unnipparavan, Kanjoliparakkal House, by the Management of Vengara Gas Agencies, is Vengara, Malappuram-676 304 represented by the justifiable or not? If not, what are the remedies Secretary, All Kerala Gas Agency Thozhilali available to him ? Gaz. No. 8/2015/DTP (Part I). 7 24th FEB. 2015] KERALA GAZETTE 34

(2) ANNEXURE

G. O. (Rt.) No. 16/2015/LBR. Whether the denial of employment to Sri Bhaskaran, C. by the management of Chamayam Textiles, Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2015. Manjeri is justifiable or not ? If not, what are the remedies available to him ? Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) the Manager, Muthoot (4) Finance Limited, Kottakkal Branch, Kottakkal P. O., Malappuram, (2) the General Manager (HRD), Muthoot G. O. (Rt.) No. 21/2015/LBR. Finance Limited, Corporate Office, Muthoot Chambers, Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2015. Opp. Saritha Theatre Complex, Banarji Road, Ernakulam Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an and the workman of the above referred establishment industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Sri Lijeesh, M. P., S/o. Ayyappan, Moozhikkal Paranjeri M/s. A.V.N. Ayurveda Formulations (P) Limited, Ayyanthol, House, Pathumoochi, Vengara P. O., Malappuram-676 308 Thrissur-680 003 and the workmen of the above referred in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this establishment represented by the General Secretary, order ; Vanijya Vyavasaya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS), Patturaikkal, Thrissur-680 022 in respect of matters mentioned in the And whereas, in the opinion of Government annexure to this order; it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ; And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred adjudication; by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Court will pass the award within a period of three months. adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of ANNEXURE three months. Whether the denial of employment to ANNEXURE Sri Lijeesh, M. P. by the management of Muthoot Finance Limited is justifiable or not ? If not, Whether the transfer of Sri K. Shaji, Driver by what are the remedies available to him? the management of M/s. A.V.N. Ayurveda Formulations (P) Limited is illegal or not ? If yes what is the remedy ?

(3) (5) G. O. (Rt.) No. 17/2015/LBR. G. O. (Rt.) No. 22/2015/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2015. Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2015. Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Sakkeer Hussain, industrial dispute exists between Sri Varghese, Managing Partner, Chamayam Textiles, Pandikkad Road, S/o. Paulose, Nellissery Veedu, Thirumudikkunnu, Manjeri P. O., Malappuram-676 121 and the workman of Koratty P. O., Thrissur-680 308 and the workman of the the above referred establishment Sri Bhaskaran, C., above referred establishment Sri Jaison, S/o. Late S/o. Konjan, Pulikkalakandi House, Thavanoor P. O., A. V. Antony, Aynikkal Veedu, Meladoor, Mala P. O., Via. Kuzhimanna, Malappuram-673 641 in respect of Thrissur-680 741 in respect of matters mentioned in the matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ; adjudication ; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of Court will pass the award within a period of three months. three months.

8 24th FEB. 2015] KERALA GAZETTE 35

ANNEXURE Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of Whether the denial of employment to Sri Jaison, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby Salesman by the employer Sri Varghese, Mariya direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Colour House, Koratty is justifiable ? If not adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour what relief he is entitled to get ? Court will pass the award within a period of three months. (6) ANNEXURE G. O. (Rt.) No. 47/2015/LBR. Whether the transfer of Sri V. Ramesh Kamath, Thiruvananthapuram, 12th January 2015. Ragasudha, Chooranattu Parambu, Elamakkara P. O., Kochi-682 026 (2) S. Lakshmi, MIG. 196, Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Gardern Street, Gandhi Nagar, Kochi-682 020 industrial dispute exists between Sri B. Mohanachandran, (3) M. N. Ranjith, 48/1684-C2, Golden Park Managing Director, Prasanthi Cashew Company Private Apartments, Adayath Lane, Elamakkara, Limited, No. 21, Prasanthi Nagar, Mangad P. O., Kollam Kochi-682 026. (4) Bejoy, C. J., Chandrassery, and the workman of the above referred establishment Indiraji Road, AIMS P. O., Kochi-682 041 by the Sri R. Satheesh Babu, Krishnakripa, Pazhanjiyil, management of M/s. Berger Paints India Limited is justifiable or not ? If not, what are the relief Thekkevila P. O., Kollam in respect of matters mentioned they are liable ? in the annexure to this order ; (8) And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for G. O. (Rt.) No. 49/2015/LBR. adjudication ; Thiruvananthapuram, 12th January 2015.

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Travancore Cements Limited, Nattakom P. O., 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby Kottayam-686 013 and the workman of the above direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for referred establishment represented by the Joint Secretary, adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour The Kerala Cements Labour Union (CITU), Court will pass the award within a period of Kottayam-686 013 in respect of matters mentioned in three months. the annexure to this order ;

ANNEXURE And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Whether the denial of employment to adjudication ; Sri R. Satheesh Babu, Clerk by the management Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred of Prasanthi Cashew Company Private Limited by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby entitled to get ? direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). (7) The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months. G. O. (Rt.) No. 48/2015/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 12th January 2015. ANNEXURE

Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Whether the transfer of Sri T. V. Radhakrishnan, Worker, from Security Department to Dredging industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Berger Department by the management of Travancore Paints India Limited, Pukkattupadi Road, Munampalam, Cements Limited, Nattakom is justifiable ? If Vadacode P. O., Cochin-682 021 and the workmen of the not, what relief the workman is entitled to ? above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Ernakulam Shops and Commercial Employee’s (9) Union (CITU), Maruthi Vilas, Canon Shed Road, G. O. (Rt.) No. 50/2015/LBR. Kochi-682 011 in respect of matters mentioned in the Thiruvananthapuram, 12th January 2015. annexure to this order ; Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an And whereas, in the opinion of Government industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Karappara it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Estate ‘A’, Padagiri P. O., Nelliyampathy, Palakkad-678 509 adjudication ; and the workman of the above referred establishment

9 24th FEB. 2015] KERALA GAZETTE 36 represented by the General Secretary, Palakkad District (11) Plantation and General Workers Union (HMS), G. O. (Rt.) No. 53/2015/LBR. Padagiri P. O., Nelliyampathy Hills, Palakkad-678 509 in Thiruvananthapuram, 12th January 2015. respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an And whereas, in the opinion of Government industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Kollam it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Dairy, Thevally, Kollam and the workmen of the above referred establishment represented by adjudication ; (1) Sri G. Babunath, General Secretary, Milma Employees Association (INTUC), Thevally, Kollam Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred (2) Sri T. K. Mohanachandran Pillai, General Secretary, by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes KCMMF (CITU), Thevally, Kollam (3) Sri Harikumar, V., Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government General Secretary, Milma Workers Union (AITUC), hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred Kollam in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The this order; Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of And whereas, in the opinion of Government three months. it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; ANNEXURE Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Whether the dismissal of Smt. A. Thaj, worker of by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Karappara Estate ‘A’, Nelliyampathy, Palakkad by Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred the management is justifiable or not. If not what for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Kollam. The relief she is entitled to ? Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months. (10) ANNEXURE G. O. (Rt.) No. 51/2015/LBR. Whether the recovery of overtime wages from the Thiruvananthapuram, 12th January 2015. monthly wages of employees by the management of Milma, Kollam is justifiable? If not what Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an relief they are entitled to get ? industrial dispute exists between the Secretary, Thalassery Primary Co-operative Agricultural and Rural By order of the Governor, Development Bank Limited, Chirakkara, Thalassery, MADHU, K., Kannur District-670 104 and the workman of the above Deputy Secretary to Government. referred establishment Sri Shaji Chacko, Ennamprayil, Payam P. O., Edoor, Kannur District-670 704 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ;

And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months.

ANNEXURE

Whether the termination of employment to Sri Shaji Chacko by the employer, of Thalassery Primary Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Limited, Thalassery is justifiable or not? If not, what relief the worker is entitled to ? 10