Part I A4 33-36
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
© Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 tIcf k¿°m¿ dated 5-9-2012 with RNI Government of Kerala Reg. No. KL/TV(N)/634/2015-17 2015 tIcf Kkddv KERALA GAZETTE B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY 2015 s^{_phcn 24 Xncph\¥]pcw, hmeyw 4 24th February 2015 \º¿ sNm∆ 1190 Ipw`w 12 } 12th Kumbham 1190 8 Vol. IV Thiruvananthapuram, No. } 1936 ^m¬Kp\w 5 Tuesday 5th Phalguna 1936 PART I Notifications and Orders issued by the Government Labour and Skills Department Union (CITU), Embichibava Smaraka Mandiram, Labour and Skills (A) Kunnummal, Malappuram-676 505 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; ORDERS And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for (1) adjudication; G. O. (Rt.) No. 15/2015/LBR. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2015. 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour industrial dispute exists between Smt. Shaniba, Licencee, Court will pass the award within a period of three months. Vengara Gas Agencies (HP Gas Dealer), K. K. Road, Vengara, Vengara P. O., Malappuram-676 304 and ANNEXURE the workman of the above referred establishment Whether the denial of employment to Sri K. P. Anil Sri K. P. Anil, S/o. Unnipparavan, Kanjoliparakkal House, by the Management of Vengara Gas Agencies, is Vengara, Malappuram-676 304 represented by the justifiable or not? If not, what are the remedies Secretary, All Kerala Gas Agency Thozhilali available to him ? Gaz. No. 8/2015/DTP (Part I). 7 24th FEB. 2015] KERALA GAZETTE 34 (2) ANNEXURE G. O. (Rt.) No. 16/2015/LBR. Whether the denial of employment to Sri Bhaskaran, C. by the management of Chamayam Textiles, Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2015. Manjeri is justifiable or not ? If not, what are the remedies available to him ? Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between (1) the Manager, Muthoot (4) Finance Limited, Kottakkal Branch, Kottakkal P. O., Malappuram, (2) the General Manager (HRD), Muthoot G. O. (Rt.) No. 21/2015/LBR. Finance Limited, Corporate Office, Muthoot Chambers, Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2015. Opp. Saritha Theatre Complex, Banarji Road, Ernakulam Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an and the workman of the above referred establishment industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Sri Lijeesh, M. P., S/o. Ayyappan, Moozhikkal Paranjeri M/s. A.V.N. Ayurveda Formulations (P) Limited, Ayyanthol, House, Pathumoochi, Vengara P. O., Malappuram-676 308 Thrissur-680 003 and the workmen of the above referred in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this establishment represented by the General Secretary, order ; Vanijya Vyavasaya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS), Patturaikkal, Thrissur-680 022 in respect of matters mentioned in the And whereas, in the opinion of Government annexure to this order; it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ; And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred adjudication; by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Court will pass the award within a period of three months. adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of ANNEXURE three months. Whether the denial of employment to ANNEXURE Sri Lijeesh, M. P. by the management of Muthoot Finance Limited is justifiable or not ? If not, Whether the transfer of Sri K. Shaji, Driver by what are the remedies available to him? the management of M/s. A.V.N. Ayurveda Formulations (P) Limited is illegal or not ? If yes what is the remedy ? (3) (5) G. O. (Rt.) No. 17/2015/LBR. G. O. (Rt.) No. 22/2015/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2015. Thiruvananthapuram, 5th January 2015. Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Sri Sakkeer Hussain, industrial dispute exists between Sri Varghese, Managing Partner, Chamayam Textiles, Pandikkad Road, S/o. Paulose, Nellissery Veedu, Thirumudikkunnu, Manjeri P. O., Malappuram-676 121 and the workman of Koratty P. O., Thrissur-680 308 and the workman of the the above referred establishment Sri Bhaskaran, C., above referred establishment Sri Jaison, S/o. Late S/o. Konjan, Pulikkalakandi House, Thavanoor P. O., A. V. Antony, Aynikkal Veedu, Meladoor, Mala P. O., Via. Kuzhimanna, Malappuram-673 641 in respect of Thrissur-680 741 in respect of matters mentioned in the matters mentioned in the annexure to this order ; annexure to this order ; And whereas, in the opinion of Government And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication ; adjudication ; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The adjudication to the Labour Court, Kozhikode. The Labour Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of Court will pass the award within a period of three months. three months. 8 24th FEB. 2015] KERALA GAZETTE 35 ANNEXURE Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of Whether the denial of employment to Sri Jaison, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby Salesman by the employer Sri Varghese, Mariya direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Colour House, Koratty is justifiable ? If not adjudication to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour what relief he is entitled to get ? Court will pass the award within a period of three months. (6) ANNEXURE G. O. (Rt.) No. 47/2015/LBR. Whether the transfer of Sri V. Ramesh Kamath, Thiruvananthapuram, 12th January 2015. Ragasudha, Chooranattu Parambu, Elamakkara P. O., Kochi-682 026 (2) S. Lakshmi, MIG. 196, Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Gardern Street, Gandhi Nagar, Kochi-682 020 industrial dispute exists between Sri B. Mohanachandran, (3) M. N. Ranjith, 48/1684-C2, Golden Park Managing Director, Prasanthi Cashew Company Private Apartments, Adayath Lane, Elamakkara, Limited, No. 21, Prasanthi Nagar, Mangad P. O., Kollam Kochi-682 026. (4) Bejoy, C. J., Chandrassery, and the workman of the above referred establishment Indiraji Road, AIMS P. O., Kochi-682 041 by the Sri R. Satheesh Babu, Krishnakripa, Pazhanjiyil, management of M/s. Berger Paints India Limited is justifiable or not ? If not, what are the relief Thekkevila P. O., Kollam in respect of matters mentioned they are liable ? in the annexure to this order ; (8) And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for G. O. (Rt.) No. 49/2015/LBR. adjudication ; Thiruvananthapuram, 12th January 2015. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, Travancore Cements Limited, Nattakom P. O., 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby Kottayam-686 013 and the workman of the above direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for referred establishment represented by the Joint Secretary, adjudication to the Labour Court, Kollam. The Labour The Kerala Cements Labour Union (CITU), Court will pass the award within a period of Kottayam-686 013 in respect of matters mentioned in three months. the annexure to this order ; ANNEXURE And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Whether the denial of employment to adjudication ; Sri R. Satheesh Babu, Clerk by the management Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred of Prasanthi Cashew Company Private Limited by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of is justifiable ? If not, what relief he is 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947), the Government hereby entitled to get ? direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Idukki (Peermade). (7) The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of three months. G. O. (Rt.) No. 48/2015/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 12th January 2015. ANNEXURE Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Whether the transfer of Sri T. V. Radhakrishnan, Worker, from Security Department to Dredging industrial dispute exists between the Manager, Berger Department by the management of Travancore Paints India Limited, Pukkattupadi Road, Munampalam, Cements Limited, Nattakom is justifiable ? If Vadacode P. O., Cochin-682 021 and the workmen of the not, what relief the workman is entitled to ? above referred establishment represented by the General Secretary, Ernakulam Shops and Commercial Employee’s (9) Union (CITU), Maruthi Vilas, Canon Shed Road, G.