Background Reports ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Background Reports ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2007 Background Reports ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Muskoka Watersheds Report Card is based on current science and local monitoring programs. It would be impossible to recognize all the technical experts who have willingly provided their input and assistance but we are grateful to all of them. Without their knowledge and expertise, it would not have been possible to complete this project. In particular, we would like to acknowledge our provincial and federal partners. The staff of the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry of the Environment were essential in providing data and guidance. The Trillium Foundation, the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans provided the funding for the Muskoka Inventory Project, without which we could not have completed the land component of the Report Card. It is through working together that we will all be able to protect the health of the watersheds that we all love and enjoy. 2007 MUSKOKA WATERSHEDS REPORT CARD TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR....................................................................................... 2 KEY MESSAGES............................................................................................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………….4 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 8 WATER ......................................................................................................................... 10 AIR ................................................................................................................................ 28 LAND............................................................................................................................. 41 CLIMATE....................................................................................................................... 64 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION .................................................................................. 75 GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................. 81 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR As we increase our understanding of the health of our watersheds and the factors that impact on their condition, we have more questions than answers. Increasing amounts of research and analysis provide more detailed perspectives, revealing more complex relationships than previously appreciated. For example, the recently completed Muskoka Strengthen Nature’s Inventory Project provides new insights into the current condition of our land and its Capacity to Cope with contributions to the overall health of the watershed. Change A watershed is defined as the land area that drains into a particular body of water, such as a lake or a river, and includes all the natural and human communities found there. The report Card looks at the health of the Muskoka and Black/Severn River Watersheds that flow from Algonquin Park through Muskoka, Haliburton, Simcoe, and Parry Sound into Georgian Bay. For over two decades, measures of the health of the watersheds of Muskoka focused on the quality of the water in lakes and rivers. A more recent and broader view of watershed health considers not only the state of the water, but the quality of surrounding terrestrial and aquatic habitats such as forests and wetlands, and the air in which they function. The following sections on Land, Air and Water detail various indicators of watershed health. Recent thought challenges us to understand the importance of the local, regional and global interconnectedness of the natural systems. While natural evolutionary change occurs When one tugs at a regardless of human activity, people cause other kinds of change. At a global we’re seeing single thing in nature, the effects of climate change, acid deposition , and exotic species. At the local level we see changes to natural habitats resulting from forestry practices and the way that development is he finds it attached to influenced and controlled. the rest of the world. The primary objective of the 2007 Watershed Report Card is to evaluate change in John Muir ecosystem condition and the impact of human actions against a standard of a healthy, functioning and sustainable watershed. The best insurance against loss of the natural, scenic, economic and intrinsic watershed values that are important to the people of Muskoka is to maintain our watersheds in as natural a condition as possible, buffering whatever stresses they face now and in the future. Several recent studies confirm that protecting, maintaining and enhancing the health and the diversity of ecosystems is essential to long-term sustainability of watersheds that will be threatened by the changing climate. Simply put, as a community, we will need to strengthen nature’s ability to cope with change. How is this best accomplished? The 2007 Report Card focuses on four primary dimensions of watershed health where we can make a difference: water, air, land and climate. The Report Card provides the foundation for an initial consideration of the key messages outlined below and described in detail in the following chapters. Deb CummiCummingngngng Chair KEY MESSAGES Strengthen Nature’s Capacity to Cope with Change ö Reduce habitat fragmentation ö Maintain large undisturbed natural areas ö Contain urban sprawl ö Remediate degraded land and water resources ö Reduce hardened surfaces ö Protect natural vegetation along shorelines ö Protect significant wetlands ö Reduce carbon emissions EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The report card takes an ecosystem approach to the analysis of watershed health An ecosystem is a unit of the living part of the world (Biosphere) e.g. pond, lake, forest, meadow, biome region e.g. great lakes forest. These units can be very small or very large. They all have living (e.g. ferns and frog) and non-living (e.g. water, soil, air) parts and they all have the sun as their source of energy. Energy moves through the ecosystem through food An ecosystem is a chains from plants (producers) to animals (consumers) to decomposers in a one-way flow. However, ecosystems all cycle or recycle nutrients e.g. phosphorus, nitrogen and carbon unit of the living part etc. All of this goes on in a kind of fluctuating balance (dynamic equilibrium). of the world e.g. pond, lake, forest, In the report card, the Muskoka and Black/Severn River watersheds are large ecosystems. meadow Inside these large ecosystem are a number of smaller ecosystems: ponds, wetlands, softwood forests, hardwood forests, meadows, lakes, streams, barrens, edge habitats between forest and field each merging into the next. This report card reflects the health and balance that exists in our watershed ecosystems. Water As people live and work around lakes, rivers and streams, they impact and change those ecosystems. Some changes may be beneficial and others may degrade the natural systems upon which both humans and other species rely. This report uses a variety of indicators to Maintain natural identify present and potential stresses on lake systems and evaluates the health of both watersheds water used for recreation and the water we drink. Our waterbodies are generally in good to very good condition for recreational use. However, our lakes are changing and scientists do not completely understand the processes that are currently occurring. Natural events and behaviours are becoming less predictable and long- term trends are not as well understood as they were previously. It appears that some indices suggest improvement while others indicate deterioration. It is generally agreed that climate change is affecting natural processes, and that intact natural systems will be critical in adapting to projected changes in climate. Prepare and implement Phosphorus is the nutrient that controls the growth of algae in most Ontario lakes. For this remedial action plans reason, a change in phosphorus concentration in a lake impacts the types of algae that live in the lake and the potential for algae blooms. Algae blooms detract from recreational water for all lakes considered quality and in some cases affect the habitat of coldwater fish species such as lake trout. Over Threshold The long-term objective is to maintain natural levels of phosphorus. Although there has been a gradual increase in long-term phosphorus over the undeveloped standard, improvement is occurring and over the last twenty years, phosphorus in over 60% of the lakes in Muskoka has remained constant or has decreased. Protect natural Shorelines vegetation protects waterbodies from nutrients and toxic chemicals that can be vegetation along carried into the lake and contribute to water quality issues. Native vegetation is an important component of a lake system and provides habitat, stormwater management, water shorelines. purification and visual beauty. Naturally vegetated yard-areas between the residence and the water strengthen nature’s capacity to resist stress, as do increased set backs for both buildings and septic systems. Protect sources of The protection of both private and municipal sources of water is essential to maintaining drinking water good drinking water supplies. In order to have a drinking water problem, there must be a source of contamination. With few exceptions, neither public nor private drinking water sources within our watersheds are subject to significant threats or possible sources of contamination. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Air The watersheds of interest to the Muskoka
Recommended publications
  • District 7 Area
    ! Little Patterson Lake Blue Lake Dunchurch 30 Snakeskin Lake C104D 0 603 Dunchurch Lake Ahmic Lake D123 C104D Burk's Falls Kearney 1 1 ! ! 7 303 5 305 0 8 Algonquin Park Bell Lake 302 06 East Ryan Lake D Shawanaga Lake 7 Algonquin Park ! 803 Emsdale D ! Mckellar Lake McKellar C101 Hart Lake ! Clear Lake 95 Bay Lake 807 Whitehall 704 Swindon Manitouwabing River ! ! Manitouwabing Lake D C 80 8 4 Belfry Lake 3 8 78 06 Nine Mile Lake 7 ± 0 0 D101B Luck Lake Wolf Lake 405 83 Crown Lake 702 8 9 85 5 2 93 66 7 Portage Lake Manitouwaba Lake 85 Clark Lake D102B 79 7 Seguin River 8 7 Big East River C103D! C102 C 86 Deavy Lake 4 8 77 7 74 8 3 4 80 2 Peninsula Lake 1 Parry Sound ! 4 ! 10 320 8 Dwight 3 4 Huntsville 75 Mcfadden Lake Fairy Lake 4 Ashworth Lake Vernon ! 00 ! 210 Yarrow Lake 20 2 65 Brennan Lake 4 01 8 Horseshoe Lake 8 54 6 Kawagama Lake C102 7 63 350 Rosseau 50 68 4 ! 7 Wolfsban e Lake 64 5 Lake Of Bays 0 Kimmins Lake 3 0 0 2 3 Mary Lake 12 3 51 Dorset Hamer Lake ! 61 53 Lake Of Bays 340 Port Sydney 64 2 Kennisis Lake 11 2 ! 6 2 9 2 6 1 Lake Joseph 33 Avery Lake D103B Code Lake Lake Rosseau Lake Joseph 3 Ufford 64 7 Fawn Lake Black Lake 18 Pairo Lakes 0 Lake Rosseau ! 55 C102D 7 Baysville Mug Lake Kapikog Lake ! D102B Stewart Lake D103B 4 10 ! Teapot Lake Grouse Lake 1 Port Carling 5 MacTier 7 45 ! North Branch Muskoka River B Moon River Bass Lake Brandy Lake 4 ! 15 C102D 36 3 0 B Gullfeather Lake 4 C102D 35 41 6 ! C102D South Branch Muskoka River C Milford Bay Bracebridge B Anson Lake C114 32 B ! 7 Bala ! 44 Musquash River C114 Long
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Field Program
    MUSKOKA HERITAGE AREAS PROGRAM A Project of the District Municipality of Muskoka and the Muskoka Heritage Foundation 10 Pine Street, Bracebridge, Ontario PIL IN3 RESULTS OF 1992 FIELD PROGRAM MUSKOKA HERITAGE AREAS PROGRAM REPORT NO. 3 RESULTS OF THE 1992 FIELD SEASON Bonnie Bergsma Ron Reid Terry Rasmussen Genevieve Taeger March 1993 The Heritage Areas Program is sponsored by the District Municipality of Muskoka and the Muskoka Heritage Foundation, with major financial support from the Ministry of Natural Resources and other agencies. TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND FUNDING ... 1 2. METHODOLOGY FOR BIOTIC FIELD PROGRAM ... 5 3. RECOMMENDATIONS .. 15 4. TECHNICAL SUMMARY: RECOMMENDED HERITAGE AREAS .. 17 Clipsham Woods .. 18 Fawn Lake Wetland .. 23 Gray Rapids .. 29 Langmaids Island .. 35 Lower Oxtongue River .. 40 Muldrew Creek .. 46 Riley Lake North .. 51 Scarcliffe Bay .. 57 Shack Creek Wetland .. 62 Spring Creek .. 70 Tasso Creek - Upper Big East River .. 71 Walker Point - Wells Creek .. 83 Westermain Woods .. 89 5. ADDITIONAL SITES OF INTEREST Sites from previous years - 1990 .. 93 Sites from previous years - 1991 .. 97 Other sites of interest from 1992 .103 6. LITERATURE CITED .106 7. APPENDIX 1 : RARE SPECIES STATUS .108 1. PROGRAM ORGANIZATION AND FUNDING: The Muskoka Heritage Areas Program was established to identify the best examples of the District's natural and cultural heritage, using a systematic, 6bjective evaluation process, and to seek mechanisms for the protection of these heritage landscapes. 1992 was the third year of a planned three-year program, with field activities relating to natural heritage features, both biotic and scenic. Evaluation of cultural heritage also began in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Water Management in the Muskoka River Watershed | November 2020
    T H E E V O L U T I O N O F Water Management I N T H E M U S K O K A R I V E R W A T E R S H E D B y C h r i s C r a g g N o v e m b e r 2 0 2 0 The Evolution of Water Management in the Muskoka River Watershed | November 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 History of Water Management in Muskoka .................................................................................................. 3 Watershed Description ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Technical Considerations ................................................................................................................................ 8 Impact of Water Retaining Structures ......................................................................................................... 10 The Current Water Management Plan ....................................................................................................... 11 Fish Spawning Impacts ................................................................................................................................... 11 Recent Water Quantity Experience ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central Ontario
    Overview Keeping Ontario Strong – Today and in the Future investment plan, called ReNew Ontario, announced in May 2005. ReNew Ontario is a $30-billion plan to strengthen The government has a vision of a successful and prosperous Ontario’s economy and communities. future for all Ontarians. The government plans to strengthen Ontario’s economy and quality of life by significantly investing The Southern Ontario Highways Program will benefit all in its transportation infrastructure. The Southern Ontario Ontarians by: Highways Program is part of the government’s long-term strategy to ensure a flourishing province for future • Increasing efficiency of moving people and goods generations. across Ontario’s highways Ontario is the economic engine of Canada and the third- • Improving quality of life for Ontarians by decreasing the largest financial centre in North America. The province’s amount of time Ontarians spend in traffic jams transportation infrastructure is the backbone of the economy. Every year, $1.2 trillion worth of goods are carried on • Improving air quality by reducing harmful fuel emissions Ontario’s highways and every day $670 million worth of goods caused by traffic congestion. cross the Ontario/US border by road. Last year, we released the Northern Ontario Highways Decades of under-investment have left the province with a Strategy, setting out the first ever five-year, $1.8 billion significant infrastructure deficit and created a backlog of program for all northern highways. pavement and bridge repairs on the province’s highways. Congestion on many highways is hurting our economy, our This year, through the Ministry of Northern Development environment and our quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Muskoka Heri1"Ageareas Program
    MUSKOKA HERI1"AGE AREAS PROGRAM A Project of the District Municipality of Muskoka and the Muskoka Heritage Foundation 10 Pine Street, Bracebridge, Ontario PIL IN3 NATURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION OF MUS KOKA P/5pared By Ron Reid aD(l Bonnie Bergsma TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements i Executive Summary and Recommendations ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Approach .. 1 1.2 Summary of Field Work 5 1.3 Integration 9 1.4 Evaluation of Candidate Areas 10 2.0 MUSKOKA'S NATURAL HERITAGE: AN OVERVIEW 2.1 Geology and Geomorphology 19 2.2 Climate and Hydrology 21 2.3 Vegetation 23 2.4 Wildlife 25 2.5 Definition of Subdistricts 26 3.0 INDIVIDUAL AREA AND SITE DESCRIPTIONS 3.1 Coastal Barrens Subdistrict Bone Island Heritage Area 31 Cognashene Lake-Longuissa Bay Heritage Area 34 Gibson River Corridor Heritage Area 37 McCrae Lake Heritage Area .. 40 Moreaus Bay Heritage Area :.......................................... 44 Pine Islands Heritage Area 47 3.2 Severn Corridor Subdistrict Clipsham's Wood Heritage Area 50 Ellison Bay Wetland Heritage Area 53 Lion's Head Heritage Area 57 Lost Channel Heritage Area 60 Lower Swift Slope Heritage Area 64 McLean Bay Wetland Heritage Area 67 Moose Lake Heritage Area 70 Neipage Lake Complex Heritage Area 73 Port Severn Outlier Heritage Area 76 Potato Island Heritage Area 79 Port Severn Lacustrine Deposit Heritage Site 82 3.3 Gibson Subdistrict Bala Bog Heritage Area 84 Concession Lake Heritage Area 87 Deer Lake Complex Heritage Area 90 Gray Rapids Heritage Area 95 Loon Lake Wetland Heritage Area ..~................................................................. 99 Lower Moon River Heritage Area 103 Morrison Lake Wetland Heritage Area 106 Bass Island A.C.P.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Muskoka Parry Sound Freshet Water Conditions Update May 11, 2019
    Ministry of Natural Ministère des ressources naturelles Resources and Forestry et des forêts Bracebridge Field Office Telephone: (705)645-8747 Parry Sound District Facsimile: (705) 645-8372 1350 High Falls Rd. Bracebridge Ontario, P1L 1W9 Muskoka Parry Sound Freshet Water Conditions Update May 11, 2019 MNRF Parry Sound District updated flood messaging on May 9, 2019. • Flood Warning is in effect for the Muskoka River, French River and Lower Pickerel River Watersheds • Flood Outlook is in effect for the remainder of the MNRF Parry Sound District Weather Forecast and Implications Lake levels and river flows are continuing their downward trends. MNRF has continued to put stoplogs in at dams in the upper watershed to help reduce flows to flood impacted areas. Areas that are experiencing flooding should continue to see levels recede as the effects of logging in the upper watersheds continue to take effect in the downstream watersheds. Due to recent precipitation in the North Bay area and northern part of the district. Lake Nipissing is continuing to rise and is expected to rise more in the coming days. Residents along the French River and lower Pickerel River watersheds may see a rise in water levels over the next week as a result from increased stormwater runoff or as a result of increased discharge from Lake Nipissing. We received 1-10mm of precipitation across the Muskoka and Magnetawan River watersheds in the last 24 hours. Daytime highs over the next week to range from 7°C to 15°C, and night time lows to range from 3°C to 5°C, depending on the weather service.
    [Show full text]
  • Bala Heritage Conservation District Study
    Bala Heritage Conservation District Study June 2014 PROJECT #: 12174BE Bala Heritage Conservation District Study Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act and provincial guidance ................................................................................. 2 1.3 Purpose of the Heritage Conservation District Study ......................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Character and appearance of the study area ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Historical settlement and context ................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Location and study area .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Muskoka Parry Sound Freshet Water Conditions Update April 13Th 2014 at 12:00Pm
    Ministry of Ministère des Natural Resources Richesses naturelles Bracebridge Area Office Parry Sound District 1350 High Falls Rd. Telephone: (705) 645-8747 Bracebridge, Ontario P1L 1W9 Facsimile: (705) 645-8372 Muskoka Parry Sound Freshet Water Conditions Update April 13th 2014 at 12:00pm Snow Parry Sound District MNR carries out snow surveys twice monthly over the duration of the winter. Snow stations are located near the Village of Rosseau, Arrowhead Provincial Park, Brooks Mills, Norway Point, Ouse Lake in Algonquin Park and near the Village of Sundridge. Above normal snow water content has been measured across the region since early January 2014. The snow water content in the snow pack as of April 11 th is 20% above normal or 120% of the historical average in the area. Snow water content in the remaining snow pack has fallen from the April 4th th snow survey readings but remains above normal for this time of year. Most managed lakes in the area are beginning to quickly trend up with rising inflows. MNR dams are currently prepared for optimal discharge through the spring melt. Current status of water levels Average Current Approximate Difference Start of High Lake Municipality/Area Summer Level Water Level rate of rise (m) Water Zone (MASL) (MASL) (cm/24h) Tea Lake Algonquin Park 417.7 417.43 0.27 418.2 8 Kawagama Lake Algonquin Highlands 355.6 354.64 0.96 356.07 6 Lake of Bays Lake of Bays 315.2 314.63 0.57 315.5 6 Wood Lake Bracebridge 301.05 300.91 0.14 301.67 3 Fox Lake Huntsville 294.4 294.59 -0.19 296 1 Huntsville Lakes Huntsville
    [Show full text]
  • Guelph District Office Direct Telephone No
    Ministry of Natural Ministère des ressources naturelles Resources and Forestry et des forêts Bracebridge Field Office Telephone: (705)645-8747 Parry Sound District Facsimile: (705) 645-8372 1350 High Falls Rd. Bracebridge Ontario, P1L 1W9 Muskoka Parry Sound Spring Water Conditions Update April 9th, 2015 Snow Parry Sound District MNRF carries out snow surveys twice monthly over the duration of the winter. The information collected is used to assess the potential for high water conditions or spring flooding. Snow stations are located near the Village of Rosseau, Arrowhead Provincial Park, Brooks Mills, Norway Point, Ouse Lake in Algonquin Park and near the Village of Sundridge. Above normal snow water content has been measured across the region again this year. The snow water content in the snow pack as of March 27th was 50% above normal or 150% of the historical average in the area. Three snow stations were measured on April 7th to determine the condition of the snow pack after warmer temperatures and precipitation preceding the Easter Weekend resulted in some runoff to local water bodies. Measurements from April 7th revealed that the snow water content in the remaining snow pack is still well above normal at Magnetawan, Big East River and Norway Point stations with readings of 111mm, 188mm and 120mm of water content respectively. The higher than normal snow water content combined with saturated watershed conditions experienced last fall due to heavy rainfall has prompted MNRF to draw down managed lakes to the lower portion of their Normal Operating Zones (NOZ) over the course of the winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedules and Appendices
    17 13 CAPE MAY 18 LOT 19 CON C 12 BD 11 16 15 Spiers SUTHERLAND Sutherland Bay Lake BAY 14 Sutherland Bay 13 Trafalgar Bay Cut LOT 19 CON B Kemp 18 LOT 12 11 CON C Wallis Narrows JUNIPER BALA PARK ISLAND ISLAND HWY 16 Echo Bay 17 169 17 MEDORA 15 M U S LOT 13 K CON B O 14 HURLING K POINT A BALA 17 WHITE BIRCH 39 ISLAND R I STRUAN LOT 18 V POINT ER CON A BALA PARK ISLAND 15 LOT 14 Bala Bay 38 LOT 37 CON A ( Lake Muskoka ) CON 7 Dam Bala STEWARTS ISLAND LITTLE STEWARTS Falls ISLAND 35 Dam 36 34 LAKE Bala Bay HESNER'S DEMPSTER ( Lake Dam ISLAND Muskoka ) LAKE Moon Hesners MUSKOKA DEMPSTER Lake WOOD River ISLAND HWY 660 HUNGRY MUSKOKA 38 ISLAND 37 BALA Bala Bay 36 (LakeBAY Muskoka) 35 34 TOMMY LAKELeech ISLAND Lake Round Bala Bay PORTER BD 1984 Lake 1986 LOT 33 ( Lake Muskoka) CON 7 32 HWY 169 BD LONG ISLAND 31 ROCK ISLAND HWY 30 169 38 37 WINDSOR FISHERMANS 36 BD ISLAND ISLAND 29 BD BD LONG Long Lake HUCKLEBERRY ISLAND BD LAKE 35 BD 34 33 32 Long Lake BD LOT 31 ( Lake Muskoka) CON 8 WAWA 29 30 ISLAND WAWONAISSA WOOD ISLAND 28 30 BD YENADIZZE 37 ISLAND Beaver 36 LEGEND Dam 0 300 600 35 BD metres BD LAND USE DESIGNATIONS BD 34 BD BD SCHEDULE G1 33 BD Beaver RESIDENTIAL Dam 32 30 N 31 BD CORE COMMERCIAL LOT 30 BALA BD RESORT COMMERCIAL CON 9 29 BD CORE COMMERCIAL -RESORT TOWNSHIP OF MUSKOKA LAKES 28 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL Island BD Lake INSTITUTIONAL Beaver Dam Island 36 INDUSTRIAL CARSWELLLake PLANNING & MAPPING [email protected] 35 OPEN SPACE 34 BD RAIL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 2009 33 CN LOT 32 Beaver Dam 17 13 CAPE MAY 18 LOT 19 CON C 12
    [Show full text]
  • T H E-J.#O-IS TR 1G-I-W UNICIPALITY of MUSKOKA
    ___T_H_E-J.#o-IS_TR_1G-I-w_ UNICIPALITY OF MUSKOKA PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 70 PINE STREET, BRACEBRIDGE, ONTARIO P1 L 1N3 Telephone (705) 645-2231 OR 1-800-461-4210 (705 area code) Fax (705) 646-2207 wwwmuskoka.on.ca TO: Chair and Members Planning and Economic Development Committee FROM: Judi Brouse Director of Watershed Programs DATE: February 14, 2008 SUBJECT: Lake System Health Monitoring Program 2007 Year End Report and Data Report 2008 Monitoring Schedule REPORT NO: PED-6-2008-1 RECOMMENDATION None. Submitted for information only. ORIGIN Annual reporting on the Lake System Health Monitoring Program. ANALYSIS The District Municipality of Muskoka's Lake System Health Monitoring Program is comprised of recreational water quality monitoring, shoreline surveys, technical assistance to lake associations interested in undertaking a volunteer based monitoring program, and a shoreline site visit program. Table 1 identifies the lakes monitored in 2007. The monitoring program is a field-based program that monitors 191 sites on 161 lakes on a rotational basis. The purpose of the monitoring program is to establish a long-term record of key water quality parameters so that trends in water quality and lake system health can be identified and appropriate management decisions can be made to protect lake water quality. In partnership with the Dorset Environmental Science Centre (DESC), Secchi depth (a measure of clarity) and phosphorus concentrations are taken as part of the provincial Lake Partner Program. DESC also tests for other parameters, such as pH, conductivity, alkalinity, calcium, and nitrogen, so that a more complete understanding of lake chemistry can be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the 2018 Technical Report
    2018 Technical Report for Eastern & Northern Georgian Bay stateofthebay.ca Acknowledgements Authors: Tianna Burke, David Bywater, Katrina Krievins, Becky Pollock (Georgian Bay Biosphere Reserve), Bev Clark (Aquatic Scientist), Carolyn Paterson (Environmental Consultant) Steering Committee: Aisha Chiandet, Severn Sound Environmental Association Christy Doyle, Muskoka Watershed Council Bob Duncanson, Georgian Bay Association Arunas Liskauskas, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Upper Great Lakes Management Unit Bill Lougheed, Georgian Bay Land Trust Greg Mason, Georgian Bay Biosphere Reserve Andrew Promaine, Georgian Bay Islands National Park Julia Sutton, Eastern Georgian Bay Stewardship Council David Sweetnam, Georgian Bay Forever Rebecca Willison, Muskoka Watershed Council Other Contributors: David Barton, Ted Briggs, Graham Bryan, Anna DeSellas, Alice Dove, Chad Fraser, Camille Girard-Ruel, Todd Howell, Rob Hyde, Stephen James, Stan Judge, Arunas Liskauskas, Britney MacLeod, Greg Mayne, George Morgan, Scott Parker, Jason Ritchie, Daniel Rokitnicki-Wojcik, Peter Sale, Heather Sargeant, Keith Sherman, Jocelyn Sherwood, Walter Tabobondung. Data Sources: Anishinabek/Ontario Fisheries Resource Centre, Canadian Wildlife Service – Ontario Region Biodiversity Atlas, District of Muskoka, Eastern Georgian Bay Stewardship Council, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada Canadian Ice Service, Georgian Bay Forever, Lake Partner Program, Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Ministry of
    [Show full text]