DOCSLIB.ORG

From Noah's Curse to Slavery's Rationale

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Noah's Curse to Slavery's Rationale From Noah's Curse to Slavery's Rationale By Felicia R. Lee Nov. 1, 2003 As stories go, this one has all the elements of good soap opera: nudity, sex and dysfunctional families. For many scholars, though, the enigmatic tale in Genesis 9 describing how Noah cursed the descendants of his son Ham with servitude remains a way to explore the complex origins of the concept of race: how and why did people begin to see themselves as racially divided? In the biblical account, Noah and his family are not described in racial terms. But as the story echoed through the centuries and around the world, variously interpreted by Islamic, Christian and Jewish scholars, Ham came to be widely portrayed as black; blackness, servitude and the idea of racial hierarchy became inextricably linked. By the 19th century, many historians agree, the belief that African-Americans were descendants of Ham was a primary justification for slavery among Southern Christians. The debate about just what the story of Ham and Noah means has marched on into the 21st century. Today scholars are increasingly reading documents in the authors' original languages and going further back in time and to more places, as well as calling on disciplines like sociology and classics. Their ambitions are also bigger than just parsing Ham. ''What I've been trying to do for 40 years is move the emphasis of scholarship about slavery from a parochial emphasis to looking at early times,'' said David Brion Davis, the director of the Gilder Lehrman Center for the Study of Slavery, Resistance and Abolition at Yale and a Pulitzer Prize-winning historian. That often means going to biblical or prebiblical sources and commentary, he said. On Friday the center will begin a two-day conference on ''slavery and the construction of race,'' in which the origins of the idea of race will be discussed. ''People are just going back and doing a lot more research, a lot more probing of sources,'' said George M. Fredrickson, the author of ''Racism: A Short History'' (Princeton University Press, 2002) and an emeritus professor of history at Stanford. As for Ham, he said, ''It's been a flexible curse -- Jews, peasants, Tatars, have been considered cursed over the years.'' David M. Goldenberg, a historian and a visiting scholar at the University of Pennsylvania, spent 13 years investigating every reference to blacks in Jewish literature up to about the seventh century. He is publishing the results of his research next month in ''The Curse of Ham: Race and Slavery in Early Judaism, Christianity and Islam'' (Princeton University Press). Among his surprising findings, he said, is evidence that a misreading of Hebrew and other Semitic languages led to the mistaken belief that the word ''Ham'' meant ''dark, black or heat.'' He concludes that in biblical and post-biblical Judaism there are no anti-black or racist sentiments, a finding that some scholars dispute. He also contends that the notion of black inferiority developed later, as blacks were enslaved across cultures. His findings, he said, dovetail with those of other scholars who have not found anti-black sentiment in ancient Greece, Rome or Arabia. ''The main methodological point of the book is to see the nexus between history and biblical interpretation,'' Mr. Goldenberg said. ''Biblical interpretation is not static.'' Stephen R. Haynes, a professor of religion at Rhodes College in Memphis, is less interested in the origins of Ham's supposed blackness than in why certain cultures have found the story so alluring. ''It appealed to racial slavery because Ham acted like you expected a black man to act,'' said Mr. Haynes, who published ''Noah's Curse: The Biblical Justification of American Slavery'' (Oxford University Press) last year. ''Slavery was necessary in the white Southern mind to control the ungovernable black. Slavery is the response to Ham's rebellious behavior.'' In the Bible, Ham finds Noah drunk and naked in Noah's tent. He tells his brothers, Shem and Japheth, who proceed to cover their father without gazing at him. When Noah finds out what happened, he curses Ham's son Canaan, saying he shall be ''a servant of servants.'' Among the many questions attached to this tale are what Ham did wrong. Was it looking at his father or telling his brothers or some implied sexual transgression? And why was Canaan cursed for Ham's actions? ''The reason the text was so valued by 19th-century people was that it was about honor,'' Mr. Haynes said. ''Ham acted dishonorably, and slavery was life without honor.'' While thousands of people have tried to interpret Noah's curse, Mr. Haynes writes: ''Scholars of history and religion alike have failed to comprehend that pro-slavery Southerners were drawn to Genesis 9:20-27 because it resonated with their deepest cultural values.'' Too often, he writes, historians have a superficial knowledge of the Bible, and scholars of religion have a limited knowledge of Southern culture. Benjamin Braude, a professor of history at Boston College and co-director of its program in Middle Eastern and Islamic studies, argues that scholars are focusing on Ham and religious sources with wider lenses. He agrees with Mr. Goldenberg about the absence of racism in the ancient world and with his argument about the misinterpretation of rabbinic passages but disagrees with his assertion that there was no color-based identity in the ancient Near East or the Bible. ''In 18th- and 19th-century Euro-America, Genesis 9:18-27 became the curse of Ham, a foundation myth for collective degradation, conventionally trotted out as God's reason for condemning generations of dark-skinned peoples from Africa to slavery,'' says Mr. Braude's paper for the Yale conference. ''In prior centuries, Jews, Christians and Muslims had exploited this story for other purposes, often tangential to the later peculiar preoccupation.'' Like other scholars, Mr. Braude concludes that later social and economic forces turned Ham into a justification for slavery. ''Before the 16th or 17th century, the racial interpretation of Ham is absent or contradictory,'' he said in an interview. ''The clearest element is in Islamic culture, but even there it is contested and not universally accepted.'' John O. Hunwick, a professor of history and religion at Northwestern University, agrees that an examination of slavery in Islam, a subject he thinks has been neglected, may hold some answers. He theorizes that because Ethiopians were the first group held as slaves in Arabia, blackness became associated with servitude. One of the pitfalls in answering questions about race is finger-pointing, said Werner Sollors, a professor of English and African-American studies at Harvard, who has written widely about race, including the curse of Ham. ''The question is: where does this thing we call racism or racial hierarchy start, and it's been very contentious,'' he said. ''It's a huge question and has a big blame attached to it. Is it the Christians, the Muslims or the Jews? You find evidence for all three.'' While the questions are not new, serious academic attention to blacks in antiquity began only in the 1960's, with books by Frank J. Snowden, a classics professor at Howard University, which is historically black, Mr. Sollors said. And now, Mr. Braude said, ''a lot of people are pushing the questions about race much further in time and reinterpreting texts that have been misunderstood from the Renaissance onward.'' ''This society is obsessed with race and color,'' he continued. ''There is, in fact, in the academy a commitment to understanding the social construction of race, but we don't look at the construction site. We are trying to see the elements that go into this -- to pull them apart and to see what fits and doesn't fit.'' Correction: Nov. 4, 2003 An article in Arts & Ideas on Saturday about Noah's curse on the descendants of his son Ham and its relation to the concept of race misstated a view of Benjamin Braude, the co-director of Boston College's program in Middle Eastern and Islamic studies. He says that he believes that there was little or no color-based identity in the ancient Near East and in the Hebrew Bible. He does not disagree with that assertion by another scholar, David M. Goldenberg. A version of this article appears in print on Nov. 1, 2003, Section B, Page 7 of the National edition with the headline: From Noah's Curse to Slavery's Rationale. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ken Ham Biography
    Ken A. Ham President/CEO Answers in Genesis Ken Ham is the president and co-founder of Answers in Genesis, an apologetics (i.e., Bible defending) ministry upholding the authority of the Bible from the first verse. The visionary behind the popular, high-tech Creation Museum near Cincinnati – which has had more than 2.5 million visitors in eight years – and also the future Ark Encounter, Ham is also a best-selling author, (“The Lie,” “Already Gone”) popular speaker, and host of a daily radio feature on 1,000 plus stations. Ham, a native of Australia, earned a bachelor’s degree in applied science (with an emphasis in environmental biology) from the Queensland Institute of Technology and a diploma of education at the University of Queensland in Brisbane. Upon graduation, Ham began his initial career as a science teacher in Australia’s public schools. He holds three honorary doctorates. In 1974, a friend from church told Ham about a book called “The Genesis Flood,” in which Drs. Henry Morris and John Whitcomb scientifically explain the geologic-transforming effects of Noah’s global Flood. Over 40 years later, it is appropriate that Ham will be opening a life-size Noah’s Ark south of Cincinnati (July 7, 2016). Burdened to tell others the facts supporting a biblical view of creation and the truth of Scripture, Ham spent his weekends speaking to various groups about creationism. In 1979, Ham left his teaching position and co-founded The Creation Science Foundation (CSF) out of his home. He borrowed money to build an extension onto his house and used a small retirement payment to buy the ministry’s first photocopier and electric typewriter.
    [Show full text]
  • Noah's Wife and Heterosexual Incestuous
    Judaica Ukrainica I (2012), 29–46 No Name WomaN: Noah’s Wife aNd heterosexual iNcestuous relatioNs iN GeNesis 9:18–29 corinne e. Blackmer Southern Connecticut State University [email protected] [Noah’s wife] was a nameless woman, and so at home among all those who were never found and never missed, who were uncommemorated, whose deaths were not remarked, nor their begettings1. I. The terse language and riddling innuendo of Gen 9:18–29, which narrates how Noah comes to curse Canaan, the son of Ham, has engaged the inter­ pretive energies of readers since the rabbis of the Babylonian Talmud spe­ culated that Ham had castrated his father2. The language of this narrative, bristling with obscure phrases, loud hints of dreadful sexual transgression, and pious cover ups, has often left subsequent interpreters sensing that the story has meanings that the narrator declines to delineate. Indeed, the only thing that remains clear is that Gen 9:18–29 functions as an etiological myth to justify the permanent subordination of the tribes of Canaan. Canaan commits an un­ speakable sexual crime against Noah’s family that results in the subsequent physical displacement and sweeping rejection of the customs of the Canaanite peoples. Indeed, Israel’s secure possession of the Promised Land is predicated on repudiating the cultural institutions of the preceding Canaanites. Whatever the larger and associated issues, however, interpretive positions have gener­ 30 Corinne E. BLACKMER ally revolved around two broad questions. What was the nature of Ham’s of­ fense, such that when he “saw his father’s nakedness” and told his brothers, Shem and Japheth, it merited the terrible curse of permanent servitude Noah pronounced over him3? Second, what was the rationale for the punishment of Canaan and why, if Ham committed the crime, would his son Canaan suffer the penalty instead? Exegetical traditions have identified the deed for which Noah curses Ca­ naan either as voyeurism, castration, or homosexual paternal incest.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Mountains to Aratta
    Seven Mountains to Aratta Searching for Noah's Ark in Iran B.J. Corbin Copyright ©2014 by B.J. Corbin. All rights reserved. 1st Edition Last edited: August 30, 2015 Website: www.bjcorbin.com ​ Follow-up book to The Explorers of Ararat: And the Search for Noah’s Ark by B.J. ​ ​ Corbin and Rex Geissler available at www.noahsarksearch.com. ​ ​ Introduction (draft) The basic premise of the book is this... could there be a relationship between the Biblical "mountains of Ararat" as the landing site of Noah's Ark and the mythical mountain of Aratta as described in ancient Sumerian literature? Both the Biblical Flood mentioned in Genesis chapters 6-8 and The Epic of Gilgamesh in tablet 11 (and other ​ Sumerian texts), seem to be drawing from the same historical flood event. Probable Noah’s Ark landing sites were initially filtered by targeting "holy mountains" in Turkey and Iran. The thinking here is that something as important and significant as where Noah's Ark landed and human civilization started (again) would permeate throughout history. Almost every ancient culture maintains a flood legend. In Turkey, both Ararat and Cudi are considered holy mountains. Generally, Christians hold Mount Ararat in Turkey as the traditional landing site of Noah's Ark, while Muslims adhering to the Koran believe that Mount Cudi (pronounced Judi in Turkish) in southern Turkey is the location where Noah's Ark landed. In Iran, both Damavand and Alvand are considered holy mountains. Comparing the geography of the 4 holy mountains, Alvand best fits the description in Genesis 11:2 of people moving “from the east” into Shinar, if one ​ ​ ​ ​ supports that definition of the verse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genesis 10 Table of Nations and Y-Chromosomal DNA Richard P
    Last updated: 18-May-2020 at 17:08 (See History.) Bible chronology main page © Richard P. Aschmann The Genesis 10 Table of Nations and Y-Chromosomal DNA Richard P. Aschmann (Aschmann.net/BibleChronology/Genesis10.pdf) Table of Contents 1. Two Family Trees Making the Same Claim ............................................................................................ 3 2. First Obvious Difficulty: Different Origin Point and Tree Shape ........................................................... 3 3. What the Table of Nations Tells Us ........................................................................................................ 4 3.1. Individuals or Nations? ........................................................................................................................ 4 3.2. How Complete is the Table? ................................................................................................................ 5 4. Successful Matches between the Two Family Trees ............................................................................... 5 4.1. Shem .................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.2. Ham ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4.3. The Semitic Conundrum ...................................................................................................................... 6 4.4. Japheth
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt's Hieroglyphs Contain a Cultural Memory of Creation and Noah's Flood
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 7 Article 36 2013 Egypt's Hieroglyphs Contain a Cultural Memory of Creation and Noah's Flood Gavin M. Cox Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Cox, Gavin M. (2013) "Egypt's Hieroglyphs Contain a Cultural Memory of Creation and Noah's Flood," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 7 , Article 36. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol7/iss1/36 Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Creationism. Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship EGYPT'S HIEROGLYPHS CONTAIN CULTURAL MEMORIES OF CREATION AND NOAH'S FLOOD Gavin M. Cox, BA Hons (Theology, LBC). 26 The Firs Park, Bakers Hill, Exeter, Devon, UK, EX2 9TD. KEYWORDS: Flood, onomatology, eponym, Hermopolitan Ogdoad, Edfu, Heliopolis, Memphis, Hermopolis, Ennead, determinative, ideograph, hieroglyphic, Documentary Hypothesis (DH). ABSTRACT A survey of standard Egyptian Encyclopedias and earliest mythology demonstrates Egyptian knowledge of Creation and the Flood consistent with the Genesis account.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging the Authenticity of Cainan, Son of Arpachshad
    JETS 60/4 (2017): 697–711 CHALLENGING THE AUTHENTICITY OF CAINAN, SON OF ARPACHSHAD ANDREW E. STEINMANN* Abstract: Most English versions list Cainan as son of Arphaxad and father of Shelah at Luke 3:36, although this person is not mentioned in the genealogies in Genesis 10, Genesis 11, or 1 Chronicles 1. This study examines the evidence for Cainan as a member of these ge- nealogies in ancient Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek sources from the second century BC through the fifth century AD. After demonstrating that there is no evidence for Cainan in these geneal- ogies before the late fourth century AD, the study concludes that Cainan was an accidental scribal displacement of the name from Luke 3:37 into the text of Luke 3:36. Subsequently, under the influence of this later text of Luke, Christian scribes added the name to other texts, including Genesis 10 LXX, Genesis 11 LXX, some manuscripts of 1 Chronicles 1 LXX, and the book of Jubilees. Key words: Cainan, Samaritan Pentateuch, targums, Codex Alexandrinus (A), Codex Vaticanus (B), Josephus, Julius Africanus, Theophilus of Antioch, Augustine, Jubilees One little-discussed problem in the biblical genealogies is the presence of Cainan, a supposed son/descendant of Arpachshad and father/ancestor of Shelah in the genealogies. This name is present in the genealogy of Jesus provided by Luke (Luke 3:36) as well as in Septuagint genealogies in the Table of Nations (Genesis 10) and in the genealogy from Shem to Abram in Gen 11:12 LXX.1 However, Cainan is absent from the Masoretic text in the OT at Gen 10:24, Gen 11:12, and 1 Chr 1:18.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis in Biblical Perspective the Gospel of Christ from Genesis from Shem to Abram – Genesis 11:10-26
    Genesis in Biblical Perspective The Gospel of Christ from Genesis From Shem to Abram – Genesis 11:10-26 This is the word of God. Genesis 11:10-26. 10 These are the generations of Shem. When Shem was 100 years old, he fathered Arpachshad two years after the flood. 11 And Shem lived after he fathered Arpachshad 500 years and had other sons and daughters. 12 When Arpachshad had lived 35 years, he fathered Shelah. 13 And Arpachshad lived after he fathered Shelah 403 years and had other sons and daughters. 14 When Shelah had lived 30 years, he fathered Eber. 15 And Shelah lived after he fathered Eber 403 years and had other sons and daughters. 16 When Eber had lived 34 years, he fathered Peleg. 17 And Eber lived after he fathered Peleg 430 years and had other sons and daughters. 18 When Peleg had lived 30 years, he fathered Reu. 19 And Peleg lived after he fathered Reu 209 years and had other sons and daughters. 20 When Reu had lived 32 years, he fathered Serug. 21 And Reu lived after he fathered Serug 207 years and had other sons and daughters. 22 When Serug had lived 30 years, he fathered Nahor. 23 And Serug lived after he fathered Nahor 200 years and had other sons and daughters. 24 When Nahor had lived 29 years, he fathered Terah. 25 And Nahor lived after he fathered Terah 119 years and had other sons and daughters. 26 When Terah had lived 70 years, he fathered Abram, Nahor, and Haran.
    [Show full text]
  • Noah's Nakedness and the Curse on Canaan (Genesis 9:20-27) Author(S): John Sietze Bergsma and Scott Walker Hahn Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol
    Noah's Nakedness and the Curse on Canaan (Genesis 9:20-27) Author(s): John Sietze Bergsma and Scott Walker Hahn Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 124, No. 1 (Spring, 2005), pp. 25-40 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30040989 Accessed: 01/11/2010 00:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sbl. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Biblical Literature.
    [Show full text]
  • About Ham and His Wicked Siblings
    ABOUT HAM AND HIS WICKED SIBLINGS Caroline Angenent 1. Genesis When the Catholic priest Frei Betto asked Fidel Castro what he remembered from the Bible teachings he received as a schoolboy, Castro recalled that one of Noah's sons was punished with black descendants. After some reflection, he added that somebody ought to investigate whether it is truly fitting to teach in religious education that being black is a punishment from God (Betto 1986:108, quoted in Linde 1993:10).' This anecdote about Fidel Castro must have inspired Van der Linde (vdL) to once again write a book about slavery. VdL has spent a long time as a Moravian missionary in Surinam, a former Dutch colony. Many of his earlier publications (e.g. Linde 1953, 1956, 1963, 1966) also dealt with the subject of slavery, mainly from the point of view of the history of the people of Surinam and the role the Society of the Moravian Brethren played in it. This time, however, vdL focuses on the history of the "curse of Ham", for centuries a legitimizing force behind slavery and slave trade. Even well into the 20th century the story is said to have been used to discriminate against coloured people, as can be read in Edgar Cairo's book Dit vuur der grote drama's. In this book Cairo tells about the children of Surinam who, a decade after the second World War, were still taught that they, being the "children of Ham", were inferior to the white people (Linde 1993:133, cf. Paasman 235:n.37).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Mount Ararat on Formation of Armenian Cultural Landscape
    jacO quarterly, Vol.2, No.4. Summer 2014 The Impact of Mount Ararat on Formation of Armenian Cultural Landscape Samaneh Rahmdel This article retrieved from the research project of "Art and Civi- M.A. in Landscape Architecture lization of Caucasus" and a field research trip, which was organ- ized in 2013 by NAZAR research center. [email protected] Abstract Armenian consider Mount Ararat mother of Armenia. The Armenian history has had deep links with this mountain from the beginning. All of Armenian myths somehow link to the mountain, and Armenian ethnic identity is defined by Ararat. Ararat is considered as symbol of two foldness of Great Armenia and pattern of reattachment of the nation's pieces. In Armenians opinion, Ararat has passed a trade from nature to t myth, from myth to culture, and from cul- ture to landscape. Its status as Armenian's most distinctive element of the natural landscape is the result of Armenians subjective selection of nature, which has been promoted to a cultural element by the association with Armenian culture and mythology. Plus Ararat has had a unique role in formation of Armenian land- scape fabric, as the most important ritual (churches in slopes of Ararat) and residential landscapes (Yerevan city) were established directly by the identified impact of Mount Ararat. In the urban landscape, Mount Ararat appears frequently in the viewpoint, urban graphic and street art; this repeated apparent which is more obvious about Ararat than any other element in the environment, suggests that the mountain has still a centralized role in cultural landscape, as it has retained its unifying role in natural landscape as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 7 the First Black King
    Lesson 7 The First Black King OBJECTIVE To explain the importance of the black race living out God’s purpose with joy of knowing one’s identity. INTRODUCTION 1. Are you able to name the key people in your family’s history? 2. How far can you go back into your family history? How important do you think it is to know your identity? How important is it for young people to know their identity? HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 1. Noah’s Family had the responsibility after the flood repopulate the earth. Read Genesis 9:1 What specifically did God say to Noah? 1. _________________________________ 2. _________________________________ Noah had a unique assignment 2. Recall Noah’s spiritual background a. Read Genesis 5:29 What was Noah’s purpose in life? ___________________________________________ Lamech, Noah’s father, identified Noah’s purpose in life, which was to be a type of Messiah b. Read Genesis 6:9 & 7:1 How would describe Noah’s character? ____________________________________ Noah was a very obedient man APPLICATION: Based on Noah’s character, what should our character be towards God? _____________________________________________________________________________ The life a believer should live before God should be one of pure obedience and righteous intentions in one’s behavior, actions, thoughts, and deeds. TRACING BLACK IDENTITY 23 The question to be asked is what color was Noah and his sons? We begin by reflecting on the skin color of Adam, a reddish color. Prior to the flood, Adam’s descendants which includes Noah and his sons, must have had a reddish skin color as well. A. Noah’s Sons – Genesis 6:6-7:1-3 – They repopulated the earth after the flood.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Implications of Noah's Curse?
    WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF NOAH’S CURSE? Written by John Piper. The curse that Noah spoke over some of the descendants of his son Ham in Genesis 9:25 is irrelevant in deciding how the dark-skinned people are to be viewed and treated. Over the centuries, some people have tried to prove that the black race is destined by God to be subservient to other races because of Noah’s words over his son Ham, who was the father of the African peoples.1 Let’s look at the actual text of Scripture, and then I will give three reasons ​ ​ why it does not prescribe how the peoples of Africa are to be viewed and treated. Recall that Noah had three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. The key text is Genesis 9:21–25 (nasb): And [Noah] drank of the wine and became drunk, and uncovered himself inside his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brothers outside. But Shem and Japheth took a garment and laid it upon both their shoulders and walked backward and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were turned away, so that they did not see their father’s nakedness. When Noah awoke from his wine, he knew what his youngest son had done to him. So he said, “Cursed be [or will be] Canaan; a servant of servants He shall be to his brothers.” ​ ​ Now notice three things. 1) Noah’s Curse Falls upon Ham’s Son Canaan First, Noah takes this occasion of the sin of his son Ham, and uses it to make a prediction about the posterity of Ham’s youngest son, Canaan.
    [Show full text]