DOCSLIB.ORG

Pismo State Beach & Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pismo State Beach & Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area Pismo State Beach and Oceano Dunes State Vehicular Recreation Area Public Works Plan Volume 2: Existing Conditions Prepared for: California State Parks 1725 23rd Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95816 Contact: Alexandra Stehl, Project Manager Prepared by: 2020 L Street Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95811 Contact: Petra Unger, Principal Table of Contents Volume 2 Page 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Park History and Existing Conditions ................................................................................... 1 2.1 Local and Regional Setting ............................................................................................... 1 2.2 Pismo State Beach ............................................................................................................ 1 2.3 Oceano Dunes SVRA ......................................................................................................... 1 2.4 Environmental Setting ...................................................................................................... 2 2.4.1 Climate .................................................................................................................... 2 2.4.2 Topography/Geology .............................................................................................. 3 2.4.3 Hydrology ................................................................................................................ 3 2.4.4 Scenic Resources and Visual Characteristics .......................................................... 4 2.4.5 Adjacent Land Use .................................................................................................. 5 2.5 Biological Resources ......................................................................................................... 5 2.5.1 Park Area Habitats .................................................................................................. 5 2.5.2 Vegetation Types .................................................................................................... 6 2.5.3 Common Wildlife in the Park Area ......................................................................... 9 2.6 Cultural and Historic Resources ..................................................................................... 10 2.6.1 Ethnographic Background ..................................................................................... 10 2.6.2 Prehistoric ............................................................................................................. 12 2.6.3 Historic - First Exploration Through American Era (1849 – Present) .................... 13 2.6.4 Energy ................................................................................................................... 17 2.6.5 Entertainment and Recreation ............................................................................. 18 2.6.6 Off-Road Vehicle Activity History .......................................................................... 19 2.6.7 California State Parks ............................................................................................ 19 2.6.8 Coastal Access and Environmental Protection Background ................................. 23 2.7 Environmental Protection Legislation ............................................................................ 25 2.8 Archaeological Resources and Site Review .................................................................... 25 2.8.1 PWP Specific Cultural Resources Review .............................................................. 26 Existing Conditions| Table of Contents i 2.8.2 Pismo State Beach Boardwalk Project .................................................................. 26 2.8.3 Oso Flaco Lake Improvement Project ................................................................... 26 2.9 Park Access, Parking, and Public Transportation ........................................................... 27 2.9.1 Access and Circulation .......................................................................................... 27 2.9.2 Parking and Public Transportation ........................................................................ 28 2.10 Park Facilities .................................................................................................................. 28 2.10.1 Overnight Visitor Facilities .................................................................................... 28 2.10.2 Day Use Areas ....................................................................................................... 29 2.10.3 Administrative and Operations Facilities .............................................................. 30 2.11 Utilities ........................................................................................................................... 30 2.11.1 Water System ........................................................................................................ 30 2.11.2 Wastewater System .............................................................................................. 30 2.11.3 Solid Waste Disposal ............................................................................................. 31 2.11.4 Electricity and Natural Gas Systems and Providers .............................................. 31 2.11.5 Communication Systems and Providers ............................................................... 31 2.12 Recreation ...................................................................................................................... 31 2.12.1 Visitor Attendance and Use Numbers .................................................................. 33 2.12.2 Pismo State Beach and Oceano Dunes SVRA Recreational Opportunities ........... 36 2.12.3 Pismo State Beach and Oceano Dunes SVRA Recreation ..................................... 36 2.12.4 Camping ................................................................................................................ 40 2.12.5 Day Use Activities .................................................................................................. 40 2.12.6 Special Events ....................................................................................................... 43 2.12.7 Holidays ................................................................................................................. 44 2.13 Education and Interpretation Program .......................................................................... 45 2.13.1 Park Interpretive Facilities .................................................................................... 45 2.13.2 Park Educational Programs ................................................................................... 46 2.13.3 Community Participation ...................................................................................... 46 2.13.4 Junior Lifeguard Program ...................................................................................... 46 2.13.6 Recurring Interpretive Special Events ................................................................... 47 2.13.7 Guided Hikes ......................................................................................................... 47 2.13.8 Trails and Signs ...................................................................................................... 48 2.13.9 Publications ........................................................................................................... 48 Existing Conditions| Table of Contents ii 2.14 Motorized Vehicle Crossing of Arroyo Grande Creek .................................................... 48 2.15 Emergency Response, Medical Aid, and Access/Egress ................................................. 49 2.16 Specialty Vehicle Safety Training (ATV and ROV) ........................................................... 49 2.17 Other Agency and Concession Vehicles ......................................................................... 49 2.18 Fire Protection ................................................................................................................ 50 2.19 Facility Management ...................................................................................................... 50 2.19.1 Beach Concessions ................................................................................................ 51 2.19.2 Oceano Dunes District Staff and Programs ........................................................... 52 2.19.3 Cultural Resources Management ......................................................................... 54 2.19.4 Natural Resource Management ............................................................................ 54 2.19.5 Dust Control Management and Maintenance ...................................................... 55 3.0 References ......................................................................................................................... 57 Appendix Appendix A. Oceano Dunes Timeline of Historic Events Tables Page Table 1. Vegetation Types and Other Land Coverage, Including Acreages within the Planning Area ......................................................................................................................... 6 Table 2. Summary of State Parks System Units (Fiscal Year 2016/17) ......................................... 32 Table 3. Public Recreation Lands at and Near the PWP Area ......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biological Report
    Biological Report 3093 Beachcomber Drive APN: 065-120-001 Morro Bay, CA Owner: Paul LaPlante Permit #29586 Prepared by V. L. Holland, Ph.D. Plant and Restoration Ecology 1697 El Cerrito Ct. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Prepared for: John K Construction, Inc. 110 Day Street Nipomo, CA 93444 [email protected] and Paul LaPlante 1935 Beachcomber Drive Morro Bay, CA 93442 March 5, 2013 BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF 3093 BEACHCOMBER DRIVE, MORRO BAY, CA 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ...................................................................... 4 LOCATION AND PHYSICAL FEATURES ........................................................ 10 FLORISTIC, VEGETATION, AND WILDLIFE INVENTORY ............................. 11 METHODS ......................................................................................................... 11 RESULTS: FLORA AND VEGETATION ON SITE .......................................... 12 FLORA .............................................................................................................. 12 VEGETATION ..................................................................................................... 13 1. ANTHROPOGENIC (RUDERAL) COMMUNITIES ................................................... 13 2. COASTAL DUNE SCRUB ................................................................................. 15 SPECIAL STATUS PLANT SPECIES ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Final Integrated Activity Plan/Environmental Impact Statement Errata
    United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Alaska State Office 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504 www.blrn .gov/alaska Dear Reader: The enclosed Errata Sheet documents minor corrections to the text of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan (TAP) that was publicly released on June 26. 2020. These corrections reflect errors that were discovered after the release of the Final EIS. We have utilized “tracked changes” (red text additions and green text crossed-out deletions) for the changes where we felt it would assist the reader to more easily identify the corrections. There are no changes or significant new circumstances or information identified in this Errata Sheet that affect the impact conclusions in the final EIS. In the Final EIS, an error was identified in Table 2-1 for the acreage available for leasing and infrastructure under Alternative E. Correcting this error required updates throughout the text of the EIS wherever acreage available for leasing and infrastructure under Alternative E was referenced. These changes are denoted with an asterisk (*) in the errata sheet. This Errata Sheet is part of the administrative record for the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska lAP Final EIS. These corrections will be posted on the BLM-Alaska website at www.blm.gov/alaska. For additional information or clarification regarding the attached Errata Sheet, please contact Stephanie Rice, Project Lead, at (907) 271-3202. Chad B. Padge t State Director Attachment: Errata Sheet ATTACHMENT: ERRATA SHEET In the Final EIS, an error was identified in Table 2-1 for the acreage available for leasing and infrastructure under Alternative E.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Status of California Monarchs
    The Legal Status of Monarch Butterflies in California International Environmental Law Project 2012 IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status The International Environmental Law Project (IELP) is a legal clinic at Lewis & Clark Law School that works to develop, implement, and enforce international environmental law. It works on a range of issues, including wildlife conservation, climate change, and issues relating to trade and the environment. This report was written by the following people from the Lewis & Clark Law School: Jennifer Amiott, Mikio Hisamatsu, Erica Lyman, Steve Moe, Toby McCartt, Jen Smith, Emily Stein, and Chris Wold. Biological information was reviewed by the following individuals from The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation: Carly Voight, Sarina Jepsen, and Scott Hoffman Black. This report was funded by the Monarch Joint Venture and the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. For more information, contact: Chris Wold Associate Professor of Law & Director International Environmental Law Project Lewis & Clark Law School 10015 SW Terwilliger Blvd Portland, OR 97219 USA TEL +1-503-768-6734 FX +1-503-768-6671 E-mail: [email protected] Web: law.lclark.edu/org/ielp Copyright © 2012 International Environmental Law Project and the Xerces Society Photo of overwintering monarchs (Danaus plexippus) clustering on a coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) on front cover by Carly Voight, The Xerces Society. IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status Table of Contents Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................v I. Introduction .........................................................................................................................1 II. Regulatory Authority of the California Department of Fish and Game ..............................5 III. Protection for Monarchs in California State Parks and on Other State Lands .....................6 A. Management of California State Parks ....................................................................6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Documentation
    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • D Classification Review in Seven Locations Across Io
    Alaska LANDFIRE Application Project: Map and Classification Review in Seven Locations across Alaska Tina Boucher, Keith Boggs Lindsey Flagstad, Mike Duffy Alaska Natural Heritage Program CAS, University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A Street, Anchorage, AK 99515 907-257-2784 [email protected] 1 4°¢¨• ض #ØÆ¥•Æ¥≥ aa!wò hC CLb5LbD{ LbÇwh5Ü/ÇLhb a9ÇIh5{!//Üw!/ò !{{9{a9bÇ {ÇÜ5ò !w9! a9ÇIh5{ a9ÇIh5{v Ü![LÇ!ÇLë9 w9ëL9í {ÇÜ5ò !w9! a9ÇIh5{ w9{Ü[Ç{!//Üw!/ò !{{9{{a9bÇ{ 59b![L 9ëÇ a!t 59b![L t[hÇ !{{LDba9bÇ Çh 9/h[hDL/![ {ò{Ç9a 59b![L /[!{{LCL/!ÇLhb !bL!Y/I!Y 9ëÇ a!t !bL!Y/I!Y t[hÇ !{{LDba9bÇ Çh 9/h[hDL/![ {ò{Ç9a !bL!Y/I!Y /[!{{LCL/!ÇLhb w9{Ü[Ç{v Ü![LÇ!ÇLë9 w9ëL9í òÜYhb!/I!w[9ò b!ÇLhb![ t!wY Y9b!L CWhw5{ b!ÇLhb![ t!wY D[!/L9w .!ò b!ÇLhb![ t!wY D!Ç9{ hC ÇI9 !w/ÇL/ b!ÇLhb![ t!wY íw!bD9[[!{!LbÇ 9[L!{ b!ÇLhb![ t!wY w9/haa9b5!ÇLhb{ !/Ybhí[95D9a9bÇ{ $ w9C9w9b/9{ $ !tt9b5Ló 9wwhw a!ÇwL/9{ !bL!Y/I!Y 9wwhw a!ÇwLó 59b![L 9wwhw a!ÇwLó !tt9b5Ló íw!bD9[[!{Ç 9[L!{ 59Ç!L[95 {/w99b {IhÇ{ !b5 Ç9óÇ 2 aa!wò hC CLb5LbD{ We conducted accuracy assessments for two national park units (the north side of Denali National Park and Aniakchak National Monument) and qualitative assessments in five additional areas representing the major ecological zones across the state including boreal, boreal transition, maritime, arctic, and Aleutian. In each assessment we reviewed the Existing Vegetation Type (EVT) Map and the ecological system classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Final 2012 Monitoring and Evaluation Report Full Document
    United States Department Tongass National Forest of Agriculture Forest Service 2012 Annual & Five Year Monitoring and Alaska Region Evaluation Report R10-MB-757 July 2013 Monitoring Overview INSIDE THIS The 2012 Annual Monitoring and Evaluation The monitoring report can be found on the Tongass web REPORT Report summarizes specific monitoring site under Projects and Plans. A full reference report for completed during fiscal year 2012 in ac- each question is available by hyperlink. cordance with the Tongass Land and Re- If you have questions or comments about this report, source Management Plan (Forest Plan). please contact Carol Seitz-Warmuth at the Ketchikan Physical & Biologi- 2–20 Chapter 6 of the Forest Plan specifies an Forest Supervisor’s Office, 907-228-6341. cal Environment annual written summary of forest wide mon- itoring programs. As a result of the 2008 Forest Plan Amend- Human Uses and 20–28 ment, some monitoring protocols and ques- Land Manage- tions were updated to better ment define and focus the monitoring work. This report serves as both Economic and 29 the annual written summary of Social Environ- forest wide monitoring programs, and also the five year review of ment all monitoring done since the Forest Plan Amendment. The five year review is a compre- hensive description of results for each monitoring question, and an evaluation of the last five years of data. Monitoring efforts are currently underway for most of the ques- tions in this report. In some cases, monitoring protocols are still being developed or under review. Monitoring and Evaluation Program Monitoring and evaluation is a ment of plans and budgets, or gathered during the year and quality control process for im- both, to facilitate feasible and identification of issues requiring plementation of the Tongass meaningful action on the immediate attention, while a Forest Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska Marlin Bowles & Bob Armstrong Juneau, Alaska 2019
    Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska Marlin Bowles & Bob Armstrong Juneau, Alaska 2019 Preface Southeast Alaska's rainforests, peatlands and alpine habitats support a wide variety of plant life. The composition of this vegetation is strongly influenced by surrounding biogeographical factors. For example, the ranges of some Asian plant species extend into Southeast Alaska by way of the Aleutian Islands; other species extend northward into this region along the Pacific coast or southward from central Alaska. Included in Southeast Alaska's vegetation are at least 27 native orchid species and varieties whose collective ranges extend from Mexico north to beyond the Arctic Circle, and from North America to northern Europe and Asia. These orchids survive in a delicate ecological balance, requiring specific insect pollinators for seed production, and mycorrhizal fungi that provide nutrients essential for seedling growth and survival of adult plants. These complex relationships can lead to vulnerability to human impacts. Orchids also tend to transplant poorly and typically perish without their fungal partners. They are best left to survive as important components of biodiversity as well as resources for our enjoyment. Our goal is to provide a useful description of Southeast Alaska's native orchids for readers who share enthusiasm for the natural environment and desire to learn more about our native orchids. This book addresses each of the native orchids found in the area of southeast Alaska extending from Yakutat and the Yukon border south to Ketchikan and the British Columbia border. For each species, we include a brief description of its distribution, habitat, size, mode of reproduction, and pollination biology.
    [Show full text]
  • 549-554-1019-901 Park Interpretive Specialist (Seasonal) ($12.54 - $15.20/Hour) – District Services / San Luis Obispo Coast District (San Luis Obispo County)
    549-554-1019-901 PARK INTERPRETIVE SPECIALIST (SEASONAL) ($12.54 - $15.20/HOUR) – DISTRICT SERVICES / SAN LUIS OBISPO COAST DISTRICT (SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY) The Park Interpretive Specialist reporting location is 750 Hearst Castle Road, San Simeon, CA 93452. This position will work under the direction of the District Services Manager. This position may assist with the interpretation and education programs of the District to include Morro Bay State Park, Montaña de Oro State Park, Estero Bluffs State Park, Harmony Headlands State Park, Hearst San Simeon State Park and outreach throughout San Luis Obispo County. This position will assist with planning, coordinating, implementing and delivering interpretive and educational programming within the District and community designed to reduce disturbance to wildlife. This position will learn the natural, cultural and recreational resources within the District and may interpret them in programs such as educational walks and talks, Junior Ranger programs, school tours, campfire programs, roving interpretation/education stations, outreach programs, and special community events. This is a seasonal position that may work up to 1500 hours per year. The position works varied shifts (20-39 hours per week). Must be able to work holidays, weekends and evenings. This position will be responsible for complying with the Department uniform standards and as an employee of California State Parks; the incumbent shall adhere to the Department performance standards. Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: Knowledge of education principles and practices and the ability to present information to a variety of audiences may be required. Applicant must have a basic knowledge of and strong interest in preventing human disturbance to wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Obispo County Coastal Plan Recreational and Visitor Serving Policies
    APPENDIX E San Luis Obispo County Coastal Plan Recreational and Visitor Serving Policies 60 - SLO North Coast Scenic Byway Corridor Plan CHAPTER 3: RECREATION & VISITOR-SERVING FACILITIES INTRODUCTION One of the primary goals of the California Coastal Act is to "... maximize public recreational opportunities in the coastal zone consistent with sound resource conservation principles and the constitutionally protected rights of private property owners." To achieve this goal, the Coastal Act requires local government to provide and protect recreational opportunities in the coastal zone through appropriate land use designations and management techniques in the Local Coastal Plan. Relationship to Coastal Act Policies To ensure that the Coastal Act goal of providing maximum recreational opportunities, the following Coastal Act policies must be addressed in the preparation of the Local Coastal Plan: 30212.5. Wherever appropriate and feasible, public facilities, including parking areas or facilities, shall be distributed throughout an area so as to mitigate against the impacts, social and otherwise, of overcrowding or overuse by the public of any single area. 30213. (Part) Lower cost visitor and recreational facilities ... shall be protected, encouraged, and, where feasible, provided. Developments providing public recreational opportunities are preferred. 30220. Coastal areas suited for water-oriented recreational activities that cannot readily be provided at inland water areas shall be protected for such uses. 30221. Oceanfront land suitable
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Obispo County, California and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ARROYO GRANDE, CITY OF 060305 ATASCADERO, CITY OF 060700 EL PASO DE ROBLES, CITY OF 060308 GROVER BEACH, CITY OF 060306 MORRO BAY, CITY OF 060307 PISMO BEACH, CITY OF 060309 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CITY OF 060310 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 060304 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) REVISED: November 16, 2012 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 06079CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: August 28, 2008 Revised Countywide FIS Date: November 16, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS – Volume 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination 4 2.0 AREA STUDIED 5 2.1 Scope of Study 5 2.2 Community Description 6 2.3 Principal Flood Problems
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Notes Quarterly Newsletter, Discounts to CCSPA Events and Discounts at Participating Public Lands Alliance Stores
    natureVOLUME 9 • SPRING 2021 notes CENTRAL COAST STATE PARKS ASSOCIATION CCSPA - SPRING 2021 | 1 ust like the ocean, our lives are in constant STAFF DIRECTORY J motion. The one thing we can rely on is change. I Kristin Howland remember some of the first Executive Director parenting advice I received: [email protected] “Just when you feel like you (805) 548-0391 are going to break, the situa- tion will change, remain pa- Alissa Maddren tient.” That advice has rung Membership and Events Coordinator true on more fronts than just [email protected] parenting, and this past year Kristin Howland (805) 548-0384 has made evermore clear that change is inevitable. The ebb and flow of the daily grind fluctuate like tides. Sometimes Sheri Robesky it feels like our lives are so full we are eroding at the banks, Retail Operations Coordinator and then just like that it drains back out again and we find [email protected] ourselves exposed. I am grateful for the currents that push (805) 548-0392 new life and wonder into our paths. I love that the tides of life test our strengths and allow us room to grow. We find BOARD MEMBERS resolve in the protections that offer us respite and security. Marylou Gooden - Board Chair Our Central Coast State Parks continue to be those special Cassandra Hammer - Secretary places we go to ground and reconnect. We camp on their Robert Priola - Treasurer earth, hike their trails, bike their mountains, surf their Tyler Conrad - Vice Chair waves, play on their beaches and admire the beauty and Valerie Glahn - Director wonder they provide us.
    [Show full text]
  • W • 32°38'47.76”N 117°8'52.44”
    public access 32°32’4”N 117°7’22”W • 32°38’47.76”N 117°8’52.44”W • 33°6’14”N 117°19’10”W • 33°22’45”N 117°34’21”W • 33°45’25.07”N 118°14’53.26”W • 33°45’31.13”N 118°20’45.04”W • 33°53’38”N 118°25’0”W • 33°55’17”N 118°24’22”W • 34°23’57”N 119°30’59”W • 34°27’38”N 120°1’27”W • 34°29’24.65”N 120°13’44.56”W • 34°58’1.2”N 120°39’0”W • 35°8’54”N 120°38’53”W • 35°20’50.42”N 120°49’33.31”W • 35°35’1”N 121°7’18”W • 36°18’22.68”N 121°54’5.76”W • 36°22’16.9”N 121°54’6.05”W • 36°31’1.56”N 121°56’33.36”W • 36°58’20”N 121°54’50”W • 36°33’59”N 121°56’48”W • 36°35’5.42”N 121°57’54.36”W • 37°0’42”N 122°11’27”W • 37°10’54”N 122°23’38”W • 37°41’48”N 122°29’57”W • 37°45’34”N 122°30’39”W • 37°46’48”N 122°30’49”W • 37°47’0”N 122°28’0”W • 37°49’30”N 122°19’03”W • 37°49’40”N 122°30’22”W • 37°54’2”N 122°38’40”W • 37°54’34”N 122°41’11”W • 38°3’59.73”N 122°53’3.98”W • 38°18’39.6”N 123°3’57.6”W • 38°22’8.39”N 123°4’25.28”W • 38°23’34.8”N 123°5’40.92”W • 39°13’25”N 123°46’7”W • 39°16’30”N 123°46’0”W • 39°25’48”N 123°25’48”W • 39°29’36”N 123°47’37”W • 39°33’10”N 123°46’1”W • 39°49’57”N 123°51’7”W • 39°55’12”N 123°56’24”W • 40°1’50”N 124°4’23”W • 40°39’29”N 124°12’59”W • 40°45’13.53”N 124°12’54.73”W 41°18’0”N 124°0’0”W • 41°45’21”N 124°12’6”W • 41°52’0”N 124°12’0”W • 41°59’33”N 124°12’36”W Public Access David Horvitz & Ed Steck In late December of 2010 and early Janu- Some articles already had images, in which ary of 2011, I drove the entire California I added mine to them.
    [Show full text]