DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment for the Preservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

3rd Floor Maerua Mall Office Towers, Jan Jonker Road, Windhoek, Namibia PO Box 81808, Windhoek, Namibia Tel: (+264) 61 435 8228 Fax: (+264) 61 435 8201 Web: www.gcs-na.biz Environmental Assessment for the Preservation and Rehabilitation of Trunk Roads 8/2 and 8/3 (TR0802 and TR0803): Taranaki, Mururani Gate to Rundu in the Kavango East, Kavango West and Otjozondjupa Regions Scoping Report Version – Final GCS Project Number: 19-0640 16 January 2020 Proponent: Roads Authority Prepared for: Aurecon GCS (Pty) Ltd. Reg No: 2006/717 Est.2008 Offices: Durban Johannesburg Lusaka Ostrava Pretoria Windhoek www.gcs-na.biz Director: AC Johnstone Roads Authority TR8/2 AND 8/3 ROAD REHABILITATION Environmental Assessment for the Preservation and Rehabilitation of Trunk Roads 8/2 and 8/3 (TR0802 and TR0803): Taranaki, Mururani Gate to Rundu in the Kavango East, Kavango West and Otjozondjupa Regions Scoping Report Version – Final 16 January 2020 Roads Authority 19-0640 DOCUMENT ISSUE STATUS Report Issue Final GCS Reference Number GCS Ref – 19-0640 Client Reference N/A Environmental Assessment for the Preservation and Rehabilitation of Trunk Roads 8/2 and 8/3 (TR0802 and TR0803): Title Taranaki, Mururani Gate to Rundu in the Kavango East, Kavango West and Otjozondjupa Regions Name Signature Date Author 1 Stephanie Strauss December 2019 Document Reviewer Sharon Meyer December 2019 LEGAL NOTICE This report or any proportion thereof and any associated documentation remain the property of GCS until the mandator effects payment of all fees and disbursements due to GCS in terms of the GCS Conditions of Contract and Project Acceptance Form. Notwithstanding the aforesaid, any reproduction, duplication, copying, adaptation, editing, change, disclosure, publication, distribution, incorporation, modification, lending, transfer, sending, delivering, serving or broadcasting must be authorised in writing by GCS. 19-0640 16 January 2020 Page 2 Roads Authority TR8/2 AND 8/3 ROAD REHABILITATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Roads Authority of Namibia (the Proponent) proposes to undertake a feasibility study for the preservation and rehabilitation of Trunk Roads 8/2 and 8/3 (TR0802 and TR0803): Taranaki, Mururani Gate to Rundu stretching across the Kavango East, Kavango West and Otjozondjupa Regions. The need for rehabilitation of the road has been determined by the deteriorating condition of said road. As such, the proponent identified the need to investigate the feasibility of rehabilitating the road to fulfil its mission of achieving a safe and efficient national road network in Namibia. The feasibility study further aims to determine possible sources for material (borrow pits) which will be needed for the road rehabilitation activities. The subject road is approximately 173 km long and extends from Grootfontein to Rundu. The road starts 3 km south of the Taranaki Farm entrance gate and ends at the Rundu Town main junction (Aurecon, 2019). The first portion of the road, TR0802, is in the Otjozondjupa Region. TR0803 is situated mostly in the Kavango West region with a small section at Rundu in the Kavango East region. This report documents the assessment of potential impacts from the proposed activity. The preliminary findings within this Scoping Report indicate that potential impacts will be of a low significance. These potential impacts can be further mitigated by implementation of an effective Environmental Management Plan. Based on the information provided in this report, GCS is confident the identified risks associated with the proposed development can be reduced to acceptable levels, should the measures recommended in the EMP be implemented and monitored effectively. It is therefore recommended that the project receive Environmental Clearance, provided that the EMP be implemented. 19-0640 16 January 2020 Page 3 Roads Authority TR8/2 AND 8/3 ROAD REHABILITATION CONTENTS PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4 2 THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) ............................................................ 4 2.1 PROJECT TEAM .............................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 NEED AND DESIRABILITY OF THE PROJECT ........................................................................................... 6 2.3 SCOPE OF WORK ........................................................................................................................... 7 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 8 3.1 ROAD CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................. 8 3.2 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY ............................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Feasibility Study ................................................................................................................ 9 3.2.2 Materials and Borrow Pits .............................................................................................. 10 3.2.3 Resources and Working Team ........................................................................................ 22 3.2.4 Infrastructure and Services ............................................................................................. 22 4 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ...................................................................................... 23 4.3.1 Water .............................................................................................................................. 23 4.3.2 Sewage............................................................................................................................ 24 4.3.3 Materials ......................................................................................................................... 24 4.4 CONCLUSIONS ON THE CONSIDERED ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................ 25 5 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................. 26 6 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE ..................................................................................................... 34 6.1 BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................................... 34 6.1.1 Climate ............................................................................................................................ 34 6.1.2 Topography, Soils and Geology....................................................................................... 34 6.1.3 Hydrology and Hydrogeology ......................................................................................... 36 6.1.4 Fauna and Flora .............................................................................................................. 37 6.2 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................. 40 7 PUBLIC CONSULTATION ............................................................................................................ 42 7.1 OBJECTIVE: ................................................................................................................................. 42 7.2 APPROACH: ................................................................................................................................ 42 7.2.1 Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) ......................................................................... 42 7.2.2 Communication with I&APs ............................................................................................ 43 8 IMPACTS IDENTIFICATION, DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT ................................................... 45 8.2 PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ......................................................................... 48 8.2.1 Impact Assessment of Biodiversity Loss .......................................................................... 48 8.2.2 Impact Assessment of Dust Generation .......................................................................... 48 8.2.3 Impact Assessment of Noise Generation ........................................................................ 49 8.3 CONSTRUCTION PHASE IMPACT ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 50 8.3.1 Impact Assessment on Environmental Degradation ....................................................... 50 8.3.2 Impact Assessment of Waste Generation ....................................................................... 51 8.3.3 Impact Assessment of Soil and Groundwater ................................................................. 51 8.3.4 Impact Assessment of Dust Generation .......................................................................... 52 8.3.5 Impact Assessment of Noise Generation ........................................................................ 53 8.3.6 Impact Assessment of Archaeological and Heritage Resources ..................................... 54 8.3.7 Impact Assessment of disturbance to local community members and businesses ......... 54 8.3.8 Impact Assessment of Temporary Employment Creation ............................................... 55 8.3.9 Impact Assessment
Recommended publications
  • Performance Assessment and Post-Election Report

    Performance Assessment and Post-Election Report

    Electoral Commission of Namibia PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND POST-ELECTION REPORT 2018 REGIONAL COUNCIL NCUNCUNI CONSTITUENCY BY- ELECTIONS HELD ON 28 MARCH 2018 Electoral Commission of Namibia 2 Electoral Commission of Namibia Electoral Commission of Namibia 2018 REGIONAL COUNCIL NCUNCUNI CONSTITUENCY BY- ELECTIONS HELD ON 28 MARCH 2018 3 Electoral Commission of Namibia 4 Electoral Commission of Namibia CONTENTS PART ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION 6 1. List of Abbreviations 6 2. Preface 7 3. Acknowledgement 8 4. Executive Summary 9 5. Performance Assessment and Post-Election Report 10 CHAPTER ONE: PRE-ELECTION PHASE 11 1. Legislative Framework 11 2. Electoral Systems and Boundaries 11 2.1 Electoral Systems 11 2.2 Clarification of Boundaries 11 3. Budgeting and Financing 11 4. Recruitment 12 5. Voter and Civic Education 12 5.1 Production and distribution of voter education materials 13 5.2 Voter Education sessions 13 6. Training and preparation of Registration and Polling Officials 13 7. Voter Registration 14 8. Provisional Voters Register 14 9. Electoral Campaigns 14 9.1 Election Materials Distribution 14 9.2 Transport 14 9.3 Printing of Ballot Papers 15 9.4 First Level Checking and Preparations of EVMs 15 10. Nominations 15 CHAPTER TWO: ELECTION DAY 16 1. Electronic Voting Machines 16 2. Voter Verification Devices 16 3. Security Arrangements 16 4. Election Day Voting 16 5. Tabulation of Results 16 6. Collation Centre 17 7. Analysis of Results 17 CHAPTER THREE: ELECTION CHALLENGES, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 1. Election Challenges and Recommendations 18 2. Conclusion 18 5 Electoral Commission of Namibia PART ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION 1.
  • Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats

    Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats

    1 Electoral Commission of Namibia 2020 Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats Votes recorded per Seats Allocation per Region Local authority area Valid votes Political Party or Organisation Party/Association Party/Association Independent Patriots for Change 283 1 Landless Peoples Movement 745 3 Aranos 1622 Popular Democratic Movement 90 1 Rally for Democracy and Progress 31 0 SWANU of Namibia 8 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 465 2 Independent Patriots for Change 38 0 Landless Peoples Movement 514 3 Gibeon 1032 Popular Democratic Movement 47 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 433 2 Independent Patriots for Change 108 1 Landless People Movement 347 3 Gochas 667 Popular Democratic Movement 65 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 147 1 Independent Patriots for Change 97 1 Landless peoples Movement 312 2 Kalkrand 698 Popular Democratic Movement 21 0 Hardap Rally for Democracy and Progress 34 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 234 2 All People’s Party 16 0 Independent Patriots for Change 40 0 Maltahöhe 1103 Landless people Movement 685 3 Popular Democratic Movement 32 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 330 2 *Results for the following Local Authorities are under review and will be released as soon as this process has been completed: Aroab, Koës, Stampriet, Otavi, Okakarara, Katima Mulilo Hardap 2 Independent Patriots for Change 180 1 Landless Peoples Movement 1726 4 Mariental 2954 Popular Democratic Movement 83 0 Republican Party of Namibia 59 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 906 2 Independent Patriots for Change 320 0 Landless Peoples Movement 2468 2 Rehoboth Independent Town
  • The Cassinga Massacre of Namibian Exiles in 1978 and the Conflicts Between Survivors’ Memories and Testimonies

    The Cassinga Massacre of Namibian Exiles in 1978 and the Conflicts Between Survivors’ Memories and Testimonies

    ENDURING SUFFERING: THE CASSINGA MASSACRE OF NAMIBIAN EXILES IN 1978 AND THE CONFLICTS BETWEEN SURVIVORS’ MEMORIES AND TESTIMONIES BY VILHO AMUKWAYA SHIGWEDHA A Dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History University of the Western Cape December 2011 Supervisor: Professor Patricia Hayes ABSTRACT During the peak of apartheid, the South African Defence Force (SADF) killed close to a thousand Namibian exiles at Cassinga in southern Angola. This happened on May 4 1978. In recent years, Namibia commemorates this day, nationwide, in remembrance of those killed and disappeared following the Cassinga attack. During each Cassinga anniversary, survivors are modelled into „living testimonies‟ of the Cassinga massacre. Customarily, at every occasion marking this event, a survivor is delegated to unpack, on behalf of other survivors, „memories of Cassinga‟ so that the inexperienced audience understands what happened on that day. Besides survivors‟ testimonies, edited video footage showing, among others, wrecks in the camp, wounded victims laying in hospital beds, an open mass grave with dead bodies, SADF paratroopers purportedly marching in Cassinga is also screened for the audience to witness the agony of that day. Interestingly, the way such presentations are constructed draw challenging questions. For example, how can the visual and oral presentations of the Cassinga violence epitomize actual memories of the Cassinga massacre? How is it possible that such presentations can generate a sense of remembrance against forgetfulness of those who did not experience that traumatic event? When I interviewed a number of survivors (2007 - 2010), they saw no analogy between testimony (visual or oral) and memory. They argued that memory unlike testimony is personal (solid, inexplicable and indescribable).
  • Performance Assessment and Post-Election Report

    Performance Assessment and Post-Election Report

    Electoral Commission of Namibia PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND POST-ELECTION REPORT 2018 REGIONAL COUNCIL NCUNCUNI CONSTITUENCY BY- ELECTIONS HELD ON 28 MARCH 2018 Electoral Commission of Namibia 2 Electoral Commission of Namibia Electoral Commission of Namibia 2018 REGIONAL COUNCIL NCUNCUNI CONSTITUENCY BY- ELECTIONS HELD ON 28 MARCH 2018 3 Electoral Commission of Namibia 4 Electoral Commission of Namibia CONTENTS PART ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION 6 1. List of Abbreviations 6 2. Preface 7 3. Acknowledgement 8 4. Executive Summary 9 5. Performance Assessment and Post-Election Report 10 CHAPTER ONE: PRE-ELECTION PHASE 11 1. Legislative Framework 11 2. Electoral Systems and Boundaries 11 2.1 Electoral Systems 11 2.2 Clarification of Boundaries 11 3. Budgeting and Financing 11 4. Recruitment 12 5. Voter and Civic Education 12 5.1 Production and distribution of voter education materials 13 5.2 Voter Education sessions 13 6. Training and preparation of Registration and Polling Officials 13 7. Voter Registration 14 8. Provisional Voters Register 14 9. Electoral Campaigns 14 9.1 Election Materials Distribution 14 9.2 Transport 14 9.3 Printing of Ballot Papers 15 9.4 First Level Checking and Preparations of EVMs 15 10. Nominations 15 CHAPTER TWO: ELECTION DAY 16 1. Electronic Voting Machines 16 2. Voter Verification Devices 16 3. Security Arrangements 16 4. Election Day Voting 16 5. Tabulation of Results 16 6. Collation Centre 17 7. Analysis of Results 17 CHAPTER THREE: ELECTION CHALLENGES, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 1. Election Challenges and Recommendations 18 2. Conclusion 18 5 Electoral Commission of Namibia PART ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION 1.
  • App-001723 Operations of Van Dyk Petroleum's Diesel

    App-001723 Operations of Van Dyk Petroleum's Diesel

    APP-001723 OPERATIONS OF VAN DYK PETROLEUM’S DIESEL WHOLESALE FACILITY, GROOTFONTEIN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Assessed by: Assessed for: Aug 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Van Dyk Petroleum CC requested Geo Pollution Technologies (Pty) Ltd to prepare an environmental management plan (EMP) for their existing diesel wholesale facility on erf 242, Maroela Street, Grootfontein. The facility operates under a wholesale licence issued by the Ministry of Mines and Energy and supplies diesel to farmers and businesses in the area. For this purposes, one aboveground 23 m3 steel tank, with concrete bunding, is present on site. Two small tanker trucks of the Proponent collects diesel from the tank for transport to clients. The tank in turn is filled with a large tanker truck, from a bulk fuel storage facility, as needed. Van Dyk Petroleum is also contracted by other members of the petroleum industry to transport fuel from the bulk fuel storage facilities in Walvis Bay, to various storage and retail facilities in northern Namibia. For this purpose the Proponent has a fleet of tanker trucks consisting of 17 trucks and 16 fuel tankers. The Proponent services his truck fleet on the premises when required. Used mineral oil, drained from vehicles being serviced, is stored on site and periodically collected by authorized third party contractors. An additional three aboveground 23 m3 steel tanks, also inside suitable concrete bunding, are present on site. These were originally used as storage of contaminated fuel, but are now empty and no longer in use. Potential environmental impacts and associated social impacts were identified and preventative / enhancement and mitigation measures are provided in the form of an EMP in this report.
  • Namibia Handbook

    Namibia Handbook

    TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................... 3 1. OVERVIEW OF NAMIBIA ............................................................................................. 4 2. TRANSPORT SYSYEM ................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Border posts ............................................................................................................................... 4 3. ROAD TRANSPORT LEGISLATION ............................................................................ 6 3.1 Speed Limits ............................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Traffic Fines ................................................................................................................................ 6 4. CROSS BORDER ROAD TRANSPORT PERMITS ....................................................... 7 5. ECONOMIC OUTLOOK ................................................................................................ 7 5.1 Trade Environment .................................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Trade Agreements ....................................................................................................................
  • Assessing Land Cover Change in Namibia's Kavango East Region: A

    Assessing Land Cover Change in Namibia's Kavango East Region: A

    Bois et Forêts des Tropiques – ISSN : L-0006-579X Volume 344 – 2e trimestre – juillet 2020 – p. 17-32 CHANGEMENT D’OCCUPATION DES SOLS / LE POINT SUR... 17 Assessing land cover change in Namibia’s Kavango East region: a multi-date object approach Edward Muhoko1, 2 Carlos de Wasseige3, 4 Vera De Cauwer5 1 Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism Directorate of Forestry Private Bag 13306, Windhoek, Namibia 2 University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER) Department of Plant Ecology Universitätsstrasse 30 95447 Bayreuth, Germany 3 Namibia University of Science and Technology Department Geo-Spatial Sciences and Technology Private Bag 13388, Windhoek, Namibia 4 Systèmes d’information à référence spatiale (SIRS) 27, rue du Carrousel, Parc de la Cimaise 59650 Villeneuve-d’Asq, France 5 Namibia University of Science and Technology Department Agriculture and Natural Resources Sciences Private Bag 13388, Windhoek, Namibia Auteur correspondant / Corresponding author: Edward Muhoko – [email protected] Photo 1. The forest stand is part of the broad-leafed savanna biome of the Kavango East region, Namibia. Photo E. Muhoko. Doi : 10.19182/bft2020.344.a31897 – Droit d’auteur © 2020, Bois et Forêts des Tropiques © Cirad – Date de soumission : 8 juillet 2019 ; date d’acceptation : 24 avril 2020 ; date de publication : 1er juin 2020. Citer l’article / To cite the article Muhoko E., de Wasseige C., De Cauwer V., 2020. Asses- sing land cover change in Namibia’s Kavango East region: Licence Creative Commons : a multi-date object approach. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, 344: 17-32. Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  • Neuerwerbungsliste Namibia 2020

    Neuerwerbungsliste Namibia 2020

    Bibliothek der Basler Afrika Bibliographien Neuerwerbungen aus und zu Namibia (Neuzugänge 1. Januar – 31. Dezember 2020) 1. Monographien S. 1 2. Periodika S. 115 3. Digitale Dokumente S. 129 Library of the Basler Afrika Bibliographien New acquisitions from and on Namibia (New acquisitions January 1 – December 31, 2020) 1. Monographs p. 1 2. Periodicals p. 115 3. Digital documents p. 129 1. Monographien / Monographs Seite 1 40 Years of Service to Namibia Windhoek: PricewaterhouseCoopers Namibia, 2016; 84p., ill., tables. Mit einem Vorwort von Nangula Uaandja. Deskriptoren: Finanzwesen + Multinationale Konzerne + Wirtschaft + Namibia Signatur: 50243 2017 Managment Effectiveness Assessment Report for Oshaampula, Okongo, Otjiu-West and Uukolonkadhi Community Forests Windhoek: Republic of Namibia, Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry, 2018; iii, 22p., ill., maps, tables. Deskriptoren: Forstwirtschaft + Management + Statistiken + Kunene (Verwaltungsregion) + Nordzentralnamibia Signatur: 50284 2017 Namibia Financial Inclusion Survey. Survey Highlights Windhoek: Namibia Statistics Agency (NSA), ca. 2018; 33p., ill., tables. Deskriptoren: Jahresberichte + Finanzwesen + Statistiken + Namibia Signatur: 50238 A da |gaipe Windhoek: Gamsberg Macmillan, 2000; 53p.. Mit einem Vorwort von L.S. Tsâtago Davids. Mit Beiträgen von Axarob, Gerson !Garibasen |Uiseb, Alma Hangue, Elias !Nanuseb, Hageb, Ruth A.K. Isaaks, J. Goeieman, Sydney ||Narib, |Awebaheb, Fritz Isak Dirkse. Deskriptoren: Lyrik (Form) + Namibia Signatur: 50064 Acquire. Discover. Finance. Build. Operate. The World's New Senior Gold Producer Vancouver: B2Gold, 2019; 7p., ill., table, map. Deskriptoren: Bergbau + Gold + Industrie + Multinationale Konzerne + Statistiken + Asien + Burkina Faso + Kanada + Mali + Namibia + Zentralamerika Signatur: 50250 Application for Finance Windhoek: Development Bank of Namibia, ca. 2018; 14p., taples. Deskriptoren: Banken + Kredite + Namibia Signatur: 50266 Aqua Services & Engineering. Your Partner in Water Treatment.
  • Namibia Goes to Vote 2015

    Namibia Goes to Vote 2015

    ProducedElection by the Institute for Public Policy Research W (IPPR)atch Issue No. 6 2015 NAMIBIA GOES TO VOTE 2015 FILL IN YOUR OWN RECORD OF THE REGIONAL AND LOCAL AUTHORITY ELECTIONS n November 27 2015 Namibians go to vote in the Regional Council and Local Authority elections. 95 constituencies will be contested in the Regional Council elections while 26 are uncontested meaning the sole candidate standing wins the Regional Council seat. 52 Local Authorities will be contested while five are uncontested. This edition of the Election Watch bulletinO lists all the regional council candidates (below) and the parties/organisations standing in the local authority elections. You can fill out the election results as they are announced in the spaces provided. Follow the fortunes of your party and candidates and see who will be elected. Constituency for Total number Political party/independent Votes per Regional Council in of votes Full names candidate candidate respect of a Region recorded ERONGO REGION Surname First names Arandis /Gawaseb Elijah Hage United Democratic Front of Namibia Imbamba Benitha Swapo Party of Namibia Prins Andreas Independent Candidate Daures !Haoseb Joram United Democratic Front of Namibia Katjiku Ehrnst Swapo Party of Namibia Ndjiharine Duludi Uahindua DTA of Namibia Rukoro Manfred Verikenda National Unity Democratic Organisation Karibib Ndjago Melania Swapo Party of Namibia Nguherimu Christiaan Rally for Democracy and Progress Tsamaseb Zedekias United Democratic Front of Namibia Omaruru Hamuntenya Johannes Tuhafeni
  • 2014 Swapo Party Election Manifesto

    2014 Swapo Party Election Manifesto

    2014 SWAPO PARTY ELECTION MANIFESTO CONSOLIDATING PEACE, STABILITY AND PROSPERITY 1 2 Inner Party Democracy At It’s Best 3 Message From The President 4 I am immensely honoured to present the SWAPO Party’s Manifesto for the 2014 Presidential and National Assembly Elections. This Manifesto, like others in the past, is designed to serves as a social contract between the Party and the Namibian people. The Manifesto is informed by our practical experiences and successes over the last 24 years as a governing Party. It is guided by the proud history of SWAPO Party as a broad-based national mass movement that spearheaded the struggle for freedom and independence. “In this In this Manifesto we set out the SWAPO Party’s vision for Namibia for the next five years. In so doing, we again seek a renewed mandate from Namibian voters during the manifesto upcoming elections to continue serving all our people, while consolidating the gains of the past 24 years. we set out Our vision is to further expand and spread the opportunities for growth and prosperity to be enjoyed by all Namibians in all parts of the country, with a specific focus on disadvantaged sections of the population. Over the past 24 years, the SWAPO Party the SWAPO Government has worked tirelessly and succeeded to bring about and maintain peace and stability, provide direction and take action in the implementation of our country’s Party’s vision development priorities. Under the SWAPO Party Government, our country has remained united. We have for Namibia enjoyed peace and stability.
  • Flags, Funerals and Fanfares: Herer O and Missionary Contestations Ofthe Acceptable, 1900-1940 *

    Flags, Funerals and Fanfares: Herer O and Missionary Contestations Ofthe Acceptable, 1900-1940 *

    Journal ofAfrican Cultural Studies, Volume 15, Number l, June 2002 Carfax Publishing Taylor & Franc« Group Flags, funerals and fanfares: Herer o and missionary contestations ofthe acceptable, 1900-1940 * JAN-BART GEWALD (Institute for African Studies, University of Cologne) ABSTRACT The article describes the contested relationship that existed between Herero people and German missionaries in Namibia between 1900 and 1940. 1t is argued that Herero converted to mission Christianity with specific aims and intentions, which were not necessarily the same as those envisaged or intended by German missionaries. The article highlights leisure time, commemorative activities and funerals, and indicates that Herero acquired specific forms of music, dress, comportment, and behaviour from German missionaries. Once these specific forms were acquired they were often transformed and brought to the f ore in ways that were considered unacceptable by the missionaries and settler society in general. The article shows that apart from race there was little difference in the intentions and activities of Herero and German settlers, both ofwhom sought to influence the same'colonial administration. In conclusion it is argued that, in the last resort, what was ofprimary importance in the colonial setting of Namibia between 1900 and 1940 was the issue of race. On a wintry Sunday morning in 1927, a missionary working in the small settlement of Otjimbingwe in Namibia found his early-morning devotional ministrations rudely disturbed by the stridently noisy arrival of a football team from the neighbouring town of Karibib. Borne on trucks bearing flags in the 'colours of the Ethiopian freedom movement' and singing songs, the young men and their supporters began a boisterous day of competition, and ensured that the missionary had but a paltry few church attendants.
  • Kavango East Region Meeting, (Rundu Governor Board Room). Friday 10Th May 2019

    Kavango East Region Meeting, (Rundu Governor Board Room). Friday 10Th May 2019

    Kavango East Region Meeting, (Rundu Governor Board Room). Friday 10th May 2019 Key stakeholders meeting Kavango West region for the proposed petroleum Exploration (Drilling of Stratigraphic wells) in Petroleum Exploration License (PEL) No. 73 Scoping, EIA and EMP. Minutes. 09:47 Meeting resumes. 09:48 Welcoming remarks by Hon. Ambassador Dr. Samuel Mbambo, Governor of Kavango East Region. 10:01 Introduction of all members present and their different portfolios by the Hon Joseph Nyando (Chairperson of Kavango East Regional Council). 10:30 Presentation by Dr Sindila Mwiya 1. Purposes and aims of the meeting 2. Background to oil and gas origin, formation, exploration and production opportunities (evolution of our planet and the Etosha Basin) 3. Petroleum systems of Namibia today covering Etosha basin, PEL 73, hydrocarbon map of Namibia, greater Kalahari basin); 4. Description of the proposed petroleum exploration (drilling of stratigraphic wells) 5. The natural receiving environment around PEL 73 and proposed Well locations 6. Assessment of positive environmental impacts 7. Assessment of negative environmental impacts 8. Conclusions and recommendations The following way Forward points were present to the meeting: - The proposed drilling is scheduled to start in November / December 2019; - Risk-Based Solutions will incorporate all the inputs / comments received from today's meeting in the final EIA and EMP Reports; 1 - In addition to our meeting of today, additional advertisements will be published in the local newspapers in order to inform