Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 65/Tuesday, April 5, 2011/Proposed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 65/Tuesday, April 5, 2011/Proposed 18684 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules Authority: Secs. 4, 303, 307(e), 309, and notification process that must be DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 332, 48 Stat. 1066, 1082, as amended; 47 completed before filing certain antenna U.S.C. 154, 303, 307(e), 309, and 332, unless structure registration applications. Fish and Wildlife Service otherwise noted. Interpret or apply 48 Stat. * * * * * 1064–1068, 1081–1105, as amended; 47 50 CFR Part 17 U.S.C. 151–155, 301–609; 3 UST 3450, 3 UST 4726, 12 UST 2377. PART 90—PRIVATE LAND MOBILE [Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2011–0016; MO 19. Section 80.3 is amended by RADIO SERVICES 92210–0–0008–B2] revising paragraphs (b) and (e) to read 22. The authority citation for part 90 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife as follows: continues to read as follows: and Plants; 12-Month Finding on a Petition To List the Bearmouth § 80.3 Other applicable rule parts of this Authority: Sections 4(i), 11, 303(g), 303(r), chapter. Mountainsnail, Byrne Resort and 332(c)(7) of the Communications Act of * * * * * Mountainsnail, and Meltwater Lednian 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161, Stonefly as Endangered or Threatened (b) Part 1. This part includes rules of 303(g), 303(r), 332(c)(7). practice and procedure for license AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, applications, adjudicatory proceedings, 23. Section 90.5 is amended by Interior. procedures for reconsideration and revising paragraphs (b) and (f) to read as ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition review of the Commission’s actions; follows: finding. provisions concerning violation notices and forfeiture proceedings; and the § 90.5 Other applicable rule parts. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and environmental processing requirements * * * * * Wildlife Service (Service), announce a that, together with the procedures (b) Part 1 includes rules of practice 12-month finding on a petition to list specified in § 17.4(c) of this chapter, if and procedure for the filing of the Bearmouth mountainsnail applicable, must be complied with prior applications for stations to operate in (Oreohelix species 3), Byrne Resort to the initiation of construction. Subpart the Wireless Telecommunications mountainsnail (Oreohelix species 31), Q of part 1 contains rules governing Services, adjudicatory proceedings and meltwater lednian stonefly (Lednia competitive bidding procedures for including hearing proceedings, and rule tumana) as endangered or threatened, resolving mutually exclusive making proceedings; procedures for and to designate critical habitat under applications for certain initial licenses. reconsideration and review of the the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as * * * * * Commission’s actions; provisions amended (Act). After review of all (e) Part 17. This part contains concerning violation notices and available scientific and commercial requirements for the construction, forfeiture proceedings; and the information, we find that listing the marking and lighting of antenna towers, environmental processing requirements Bearmouth mountainsnail and the and the environmental notification that, together with the procedures Byrne Resort mountainsnail is not process that must be completed before specified in § 17.4(c) of this chapter, if warranted because neither constitutes a valid taxon; therefore, they are not filing certain antenna structure applicable, must be complied with prior considered to be listable entities under registration applications. to initiating construction. the Act. We find that listing of the * * * * * * * * * * meltwater lednian stonefly is warranted. PART 87—AVIATION SERVICES (f) Part 17 contains requirements for However, currently listing of the construction, marking and lighting of meltwater lednian stonefly is precluded 20. The authority citation for part 87 antenna towers, and the environmental by higher priority actions to amend the continues to read as follows: notification process that must be Lists of Endangered and Threatened Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, and 307(e), completed before filing certain antenna Wildlife and Plants. Upon publication unless otherwise noted. structure registration applications. of this 12-month petition finding, we 21. Section 87.3 is amended by * * * * * will add the meltwater lednian stonefly to our candidate species list. We will revising paragraphs (b) and (e) to read 24. Section 90.129 is amended by as follows: develop a proposed rule to list the revising paragraph (g) to read as follows: meltwater lednian stonefly as our § 87.3 Other applicable rule parts. § 90.129 Supplemental information to be priorities allow. We will make any * * * * * routinely submitted with applications. determination on critical habitat during development of the proposed listing (b) Part 1 contains rules of practice * * * * * and procedure for license applications, rule. During any interim period, we will adjudicatory proceedings, rule making (g) The environmental assessment address the status of the candidate taxon proceedings, procedures for required by §§ 1.1307 and 1.1311 of this through our annual Candidate Notice of reconsideration and review of the chapter, if applicable. If an application Review (CNOR). Commission’s actions; provisions filed under this part proposes the use of DATES: The finding announced in this concerning violation notices and one or more new or existing antenna document was made on April 5, 2011. forfeiture proceedings; and the structures that require registration under ADDRESSES: This finding is available on environmental processing requirements part 17 of this chapter, any required the Internet at http:// that, together with the procedures environmental assessment should be www.regulations.gov at Docket Number specified in § 17.4(c) of this chapter, if submitted pursuant to the process set FWS–R6–ES–2011–0016. Supporting applicable, must be complied with prior forth in § 17.4(c) of this chapter rather documentation we used in preparing to the initiation of construction. than with the application filed under this finding is available for public * * * * * this part. inspection, by appointment, during (e) Part 17 contains requirements for * * * * * normal business hours at the U.S. Fish construction, marking and lighting of [FR Doc. 2011–7785 Filed 4–4–11; 8:45 am] and Wildlife Service, Montana Field antenna towers, and the environmental BILLING CODE 6712–01–P Office, 585 Shepard Way, Helena, MT VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:08 Apr 04, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM 05APP1 WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules 18685 59601. Please submit any new preliminary review, we found no Byrne Resort mountainsnail, and information, materials, comments, or compelling evidence to support an meltwater lednian stonefly as questions concerning this finding to the emergency listing for any of the species endangered or threatened. above street address. covered by the petition, and that we Species Information for Bearmouth planned work on the petition in Fiscal FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mountainsnail and Byrne Resort Year (FY) 2008. Mark Wilson, Field Supervisor, Mountainsnail Montana Field Office (see ADDRESSES); On March 19, 2008, WildEarth by telephone at 406–449–5225; or by Guardians filed a complaint (1:08–CV– Species Descriptions 472–CKK) indicating that the Service facsimile at 406–449–5339. Persons who Bearmouth mountainsnail and Byrne failed to comply with its statutory duty use a telecommunications device for the Resort mountainsnail are ascribed to the to make 90-day findings on their two deaf (TDD) may call the Federal genus Oreohelix, commonly called the multiple species petitions in two of the Information Relay Service (FIRS) at ‘‘mountainsnail.’’ This genus of land 800–877–8339. Service’s administrative regions—one for the mountain-prairie region, and one snails is endemic to western North SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: for the Southwest region (WildEarth America and is found in mountainous environments in the western United Background Guardians v. Kempthorne 2008, case 1:08–CV–472–CKK). We subsequently States from the eastern Sierra Nevadas Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act (16 published two initial 90-day findings on in the west to the Black Hills in the east, U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that, for January 6, 2009 (74 FR 419), and and from southern Canada down to any petition containing substantial February 5, 2009 (74 FR 6122), northern Mexico (Pilsbry 1916, pp. 341– scientific or commercial information identifying species for which we were 342; Pilsbry 1939, pp. 415–416; Weaver indicating that listing the species may then making negative 90-day findings, 2006, p. 9). be warranted, we make a finding within and species for which we were still Biology and Life History 12 months of the date of receipt of the working on a determination. The Most mountainsnail species are petition. In this finding, we determine Bearmouth mountainsnail, Byrne Resort that the petitioned action is: (a) Not mountainsnail, and meltwater lednian relatively large land snails (adult body warranted, (b) warranted, or (c) stonefly were not addressed in either size greater than 5 centimeters (cm) (2 warranted, but immediate proposal of a 90-day finding published in 2009, as we inches (in.)) that typically prefer regulation implementing the petitioned were still conducting our analyses of forested environments, calcium-rich action is precluded by other pending these mountainsnails and the stonefly.
Recommended publications
  • Oreohelices of Utah, I. Rediscovery of the Uinta Mountainsnail, Oreohelix Eurekensis Uinta Brooks, 1939 (Stylommatophora: Oreohelicidae)
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 60 Number 4 Article 13 10-31-2000 Oreohelices of Utah, I. Rediscovery of the Uinta mountainsnail, Oreohelix eurekensis uinta Brooks, 1939 (Stylommatophora: Oreohelicidae) George V. Oliver Utah Natural Heritage Program, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Salt Lake City, Utah William R. Bosworth III Utah Natural Heritage Program, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Salt Lake City, Utah Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Oliver, George V. and Bosworth, William R. III (2000) "Oreohelices of Utah, I. Rediscovery of the Uinta mountainsnail, Oreohelix eurekensis uinta Brooks, 1939 (Stylommatophora: Oreohelicidae)," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 60 : No. 4 , Article 13. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol60/iss4/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 60(4), © 2000, pp. 451–455 OREOHELICES OF UTAH, I. REDISCOVERY OF THE UINTA MOUNTAINSNAIL, OREOHELIX EUREKENSIS UINTA BROOKS, 1939 (STYLOMMATOPHORA: OREOHELICIDAE) George V. Oliver1 and William R. Bosworth III1 ABSTRACT.—Oreohelix eurekensis uinta had not been found since its original discovery and had never been reported as a living taxon, and this had led to speculation that it is extinct. However, searches for O. e. uinta had been confounded by multiple errors in the original definition of the type locality. The type locality has now been relocated and is here redefined, and O.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Insects Are Dramatically Underrepresented in Genomic Research
    insects Communication Aquatic Insects Are Dramatically Underrepresented in Genomic Research Scott Hotaling 1,* , Joanna L. Kelley 1 and Paul B. Frandsen 2,3,* 1 School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84062, USA 3 Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20002, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (P.B.F.); Tel.: +1-(828)-507-9950 (S.H.); +1-(801)-422-2283 (P.B.F.) Received: 20 August 2020; Accepted: 3 September 2020; Published: 5 September 2020 Simple Summary: The genome is the basic evolutionary unit underpinning life on Earth. Knowing its sequence, including the many thousands of genes coding for proteins in an organism, empowers scientific discovery for both the focal organism and related species. Aquatic insects represent 10% of all insect diversity, can be found on every continent except Antarctica, and are key components of freshwater ecosystems. However, aquatic insect genome biology lags dramatically behind that of terrestrial insects. If genomic effort was spread evenly, one aquatic insect genome would be sequenced for every ~9 terrestrial insect genomes. Instead, ~24 terrestrial insect genomes have been sequenced for every aquatic insect genome. A lack of aquatic genomes is limiting research progress in the field at both fundamental and applied scales. We argue that the limited availability of aquatic insect genomes is not due to practical limitations—small body sizes or overly complex genomes—but instead reflects a lack of research interest. We call for targeted efforts to expand the availability of aquatic insect genomic resources to empower future research.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography and Trematode Parasitism of Oreohelix Land Snails in Southern Alberta
    PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND TREMATODE PARASITISM OF OREOHELIX LAND SNAILS IN SOUTHERN ALBERTA ZACHARIAH WILLIAM DEMPSEY BSc, Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, 2014 A Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of the University of Lethbridge in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Biological Sciences University of Lethbridge LETHBRIDGE, ALBERTA, CANADA © Zach W. Dempsey, 2017 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND TREMATODE PARASITISM OF OREOHELIX LAND SNAILS IN SOUTHERN ALBERTA ZACHARIAH WILLIAM DEMPSEY Date of Defence: June 07, 2017 Dr. Theresa Burg Associate Professor Ph.D. Co-supervisor Dr. Cameron Goater Professor Ph.D. Co-supervisor Dr. Hester Jiskoot Associate Professor Ph.D. Thesis Examination Committee member Dr. Robert Laird Associate Professor Ph.D. Thesis Examination Committee member Dr. Kathleen Weaver Assistant Professor Ph.D. External, Thesis Examination Committee University of La Verne California, U.S.A. Dr. Tony Russell Associate Professor Ph.D. Chair, Thesis Examination Committee ABSTRACT Modern studies in phylogeography integrate many once-disparate scientific fields. This study investigated terrestrial mountain snails, Oreohelix spp., in southern Alberta using DNA markers and the recent emergence of the trematode parasite Dicrocoelium dendriticum. Large-bodied snails in Cypress Hills (CH) and the Rocky Mountains (RM) formed three clades within the species complex O. subrudis. One was geographically widespread, one was restricted to one region in the RM, and one was restricted to CH. Small-bodied snails in CH were determined to be O. cooperi, a rare Oreohelid thought to be imperilled in the western U.S.A. Phylogeographic analyses determined that snails likely colonized and came into contact in CH due to its glacial history.
    [Show full text]
  • Interior Columbia Basin Mollusk Species of Special Concern
    Deixis l-4 consultants INTERIOR COLUMl3lA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN cryptomasfix magnidenfata (Pilsbly, 1940), x7.5 FINAL REPORT Contract #43-OEOO-4-9112 Prepared for: INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT 112 East Poplar Street Walla Walla, WA 99362 TERRENCE J. FREST EDWARD J. JOHANNES January 15, 1995 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 ‘(206) 527-6764 INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN MOLLUSK SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN Terrence J. Frest & Edward J. Johannes Deixis Consultants 2517 NE 65th Street Seattle, WA 98115-7125 (206) 527-6764 January 15,1995 i Each shell, each crawling insect holds a rank important in the plan of Him who framed This scale of beings; holds a rank, which lost Would break the chain and leave behind a gap Which Nature’s self wcuid rue. -Stiiiingfieet, quoted in Tryon (1882) The fast word in ignorance is the man who says of an animal or plant: “what good is it?” If the land mechanism as a whole is good, then every part is good, whether we understand it or not. if the biota in the course of eons has built something we like but do not understand, then who but a fool would discard seemingly useless parts? To keep every cog and wheel is the first rule of intelligent tinkering. -Aido Leopold Put the information you have uncovered to beneficial use. -Anonymous: fortune cookie from China Garden restaurant, Seattle, WA in this “business first” society that we have developed (and that we maintain), the promulgators and pragmatic apologists who favor a “single crop” approach, to enable a continuous “harvest” from the natural system that we have decimated in the name of profits, jobs, etc., are fairfy easy to find.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of a Novel Predator on Aquatic Invertebrates in Fishless Lakes: Implications for Conservation Translocations
    Impacts of a novel predator on aquatic invertebrates in fishless lakes: Implications for conservation translocations by Allison L K Banting A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Biology Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta © Allison L K Banting, 2018 ABSTRACT Fishless mountain lakes hold important ecological and conservation value. As such, managers are establishing conservation goals (e.g., non-native fish removal) to restore the naturalness to many of these lakes. Managers who are recovering native coldwater fish populations threatened by climate change (e.g., Westslope Cutthroat Trout, Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi and Bull Trout, Salvelinus confluentus) are simultaneously exploring conservation strategies involving the intentional translocation of native fish species to more suitable areas. These areas include unoccupied, or naturally fishless, stream and lake habitat within their native range or favorable habitats outside their native range. This action presents a potential threat for fishless mountain lakes as conservation managers view these as recovery habitat for imperiled native fish species. The purpose of my study was to inform native fish recovery efforts by assessing the potential consequences of translocating native fishes to naturally fishless lakes, thus outside their historic distribution. Forty alpine and sub-alpine lakes in Banff National Park, Alberta and Kootenay National Park, British Columbia were sampled and divided into three lake types, including: 13 naturally fishless lakes, 13 native fish-bearing or native fish-stocked lakes, and 14 non-native fish-stocked lakes historically unoccupied by fish. Littoral invertebrate community composition (presence or absence), density and diversity were examined among lake types to 1) quantify the impacts of introducing non-native fishes into historically fishless lakes, and 2) quantify the differences between native fish lakes and naturally fishless lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • In Baltic Amber 85
    Overview and descriptions of fossil stoneflies (Plecoptera) in Baltic amber 85 Entomologie heute 22 (2010): 85-97 Overview and Descriptions of Fossil Stoneflies (Plecoptera) in Baltic Amber Übersicht und Beschreibungen von fossilen Steinfliegen (Plecoptera) im Baltischen Bernstein CELESTINE CARUSO & WILFRIED WICHARD Summary: Three new fossil species of stoneflies (Plecoptera: Nemouridae and Leuctridae) from Eocene Baltic amber are being described: Zealeuctra cornuta n. sp., Lednia zilli n. sp., and Podmosta attenuata n. sp.. Extant species of these three genera are found in Eastern Asia and in the Nearctic region. It is very probably that the genera must have been widely spread across the northern hemisphere in the Cretaceous period, before Europe was an archipelago in Eocene. The current state of knowledge about the seventeen Plecoptera species of Baltic amber is shortly presented. Due to discovered homonymies, the following nomenclatural corrections are proposed: Leuctra fusca Pictet, 1856 in Leuctra electrofusca Caruso & Wichard, 2010 and Nemoura affinis Berendt, 1856 in Nemoura electroaffinis Caruso & Wichard, 2010. Keywords: Fossil insects, fossil Plecoptera, Eocene, paleobiogeography Zusammenfassung: In dieser Arbeit werden drei neue fossile Steinfliegen-Arten (Plecoptera: Nemouridae und Leuctridae) des Baltischen Bernsteins beschrieben: Zealeuctra cornuta n. sp., Lednia zilli n. sp., Podmosta attenuata n. sp.. Rezente Arten der drei Gattungen sind in Ostasien und in der nearktischen Region nachgewiesen. Sehr wahrscheinlich breiteten sich die Gattungen in der Krei- dezeit über die nördliche Hemisphäre aus, noch bevor Europa im Eozän ein Archipel war. Der gegenwärtige Kenntnisstand über die siebzehn Plecoptera Arten des Baltischen Bernsteins wird kurz dargelegt. Wegen bestehender Homonymien werden folgende nomenklatorische Korrekturen vorgenommen: Leuctra fusca Pictet, 1856 in Leuctra electrofusca Caruso & Wichard, 2010 und Nemoura affinis Berendt, 1856 in Nemoura electroaffinis Caruso & Wichard, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Animal Species of Concern
    MONTANA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Animal Species of Concern Species List Last Updated 08/05/2010 219 Species of Concern 86 Potential Species of Concern All Records (no filtering) A program of the University of Montana and Natural Resource Information Systems, Montana State Library Introduction The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) serves as the state's information source for animals, plants, and plant communities with a focus on species and communities that are rare, threatened, and/or have declining trends and as a result are at risk or potentially at risk of extirpation in Montana. This report on Montana Animal Species of Concern is produced jointly by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Montana Animal Species of Concern are native Montana animals that are considered to be "at risk" due to declining population trends, threats to their habitats, and/or restricted distribution. Also included in this report are Potential Animal Species of Concern -- animals for which current, often limited, information suggests potential vulnerability or for which additional data are needed before an accurate status assessment can be made. Over the last 200 years, 5 species with historic breeding ranges in Montana have been extirpated from the state; Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido), Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), Pilose Crayfish (Pacifastacus gambelii), and Rocky Mountain Locust (Melanoplus spretus). Designation as a Montana Animal Species of Concern or Potential Animal Species of Concern is not a statutory or regulatory classification. Instead, these designations provide a basis for resource managers and decision-makers to make proactive decisions regarding species conservation and data collection priorities in order to avoid additional extirpations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanonemoura, a New Stonefly Genus from the Columbia River Gorge, Oregon (Plecoptera: Nemouridae)
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 61 Number 4 Article 3 11-15-2001 Nanonemoura, a new stonefly genus from the Columbia River Gorge, Oregon (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) R. W. Baumann Brigham Young University G.R. Fiala Gresham, Oregon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Baumann, R. W. and Fiala, G.R. (2001) "Nanonemoura, a new stonefly genus from the Columbia River Gorge, Oregon (Plecoptera: Nemouridae)," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 61 : No. 4 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol61/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 61(4), © 2001, pp. 403–408 NANONEMOURA, A NEW STONEFLY GENUS FROM THE COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE, OREGON (PLECOPTERA: NEMOURIDAE) R.W. Baumann1 and G.R. Fiala2 ABSTRACT.—Nanonemoura, a new genus of Nearctic Nemouridae, is described to accommodate Nemoura wahkeena Jewett. New descriptions and illustrations are provided for the adult male, adult female, and nymph collected at Wah- keena Spring, Columbia River George, Oregon. A diagnosis is furnished to distinguish the new genus from related gen- era of the subfamily Nemourinae. Key words: Plecoptera, Nemouridae, Nanonemoura, Columbia River Gorge, Oregon. Nearly 50 years ago Jewett (1954) named a nymph of this species. We discovered that the nemourid species from the Columbia River species does not live in the falls or even in the Gorge.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrates
    State Wildlife Action Plan Update Appendix A-5 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fact Sheets INVERTEBRATES Conservation Status and Concern Biology and Life History Distribution and Abundance Habitat Needs Stressors Conservation Actions Needed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 2015 Appendix A-5 SGCN Invertebrates – Fact Sheets Table of Contents What is Included in Appendix A-5 1 MILLIPEDE 2 LESCHI’S MILLIPEDE (Leschius mcallisteri)........................................................................................................... 2 MAYFLIES 4 MAYFLIES (Ephemeroptera) ................................................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Cinygmula gartrelli) .................................................................................................................... 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia falcula) ............................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia jenseni) ............................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Siphlonurus autumnalis) .............................................................................................................. 4 [unnamed] (Cinygmula gartrelli) .................................................................................................................... 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia falcula) ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • June Preston, Editor 832 Sunset Drive USA No.2 Mar/Apr
    No.2 Mar/Apr 1983 of the LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY June Preston, Editor 832 Sunset Drive Lawrenc~KS 66044 USA ======================================================================================= ASSOCIATE EDITORS ART: Les Sielski RIPPLES: Jo Brewer ZONE COORDINATORS 1 Robert Langston 8 Kene1m Philip 2 Jon Shepard 5 Mo Nielsen 9 Eduardo Welling M. 3 Ray Stanford 6 Dave Baggett 10 Boyce Drummond 4 Hugh Freeman 7 Dave Winter 11 Quimby Hess =============================================================:========================= ZONE 1 SOUTHWEST: ARIZONA, NEVADA, CALIFORNIA. Coordinator: R. L. Langston (RLL). Contributors: R. L. Allen (RA), R. A. Bailowitz (RB), R. M. Brown (RMW), Jim and Joan Coleman (J-JC), K. Davenport (KD), J. F. Emmel (JE), C. D. Ferris (CDF), G. A. Gorelick (GG), C. Hageman (CH), K. Hansen (KH), R. V. Kelson (RK), T. W. Koerber (TK), R. H. Leuschner (RHL), D. Marion (DM), Eileen and S. O. Mattoon (E-SM), R. O'Donnell (RO), D. Parkinson (DP), F. P. Sala (FS), A. M. Shapiro (AS), o. Shields (OS), R. J. Skalski (RS) and W. L. Swisher (WS). COUNTY, STATE (in caps.) = new county, state records. NORTH, SOUTH, HIGH, LOW, EARLY, LATE, etc. (in caps.) are also considered records by the contributors and/or the coordinator. ARIZONA. No new COUNTY records or range extension for 1982. Most data was from the well-collected southeastern part of the state. Transients were hampered by cold, wet weather in Apache Co., Coconico Co., Cochise Co., Aug. (CDF), with heavy rains in Cochise Co., Sept. (RHL). Windy, cold and rainy in Pima Co., Sept. (RHL). No migrations were reported from Arizona. MOTHS: Sphingidae: Xylophanes falco, Cave Creek area, Chiricahua Mtns., Cochise Co., 9-11 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-Month Finding on a Petition to List the Tamaulipan Agapema
    Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 27, 2011 / Proposed Rules 59623 no evidence that such exception would DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Comments received generally will be cause possible harmful interference to posted without change to http:// an authorized satellite system, said Defense Acquisition Regulations www.regulations.gov, including any transmission path may be authorized on System personal and/or business confidential waiver basis where the maximum value information provided. To confirm of the equivalent isotropically radiated 48 CFR Parts 205, 208, 212, 213, 214, receipt of your comment(s), please power (EIRP) does not exceed: 215, 216, and 252 check http://www.regulations.gov approximately two to three days after * * * * * RIN 0750–AH11 submission to verify posting (except (c) 12.7 to 13.25 GHz. No directional Defense Federal Acquisition allow 30 days for posting of comments transmitting antenna utilized by a fixed Regulation Supplement; Only One submitted by mail). station operating in this band with EIRP Offer (DFARS Case 2011–D013) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. greater than 45 dBW may be aimed Amy Williams, 703–602–0328. AGENCY: Defense Acquisition within 1.5 degrees of the geostationary- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: satellite orbit, taking into account Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). atmospheric refraction. I. Background ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of * * * * * DoD published a proposed rule in the comment period. Federal Register on July 25, 2011, at 76 7. Amend § 101.147 by revising FR 44293, with a request for comments paragraph (i) introductory text, adding SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) on or before September 23, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Brewster County, Texas, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]