Copyright by Toni Maria Stickler 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Copyright by Toni Maria Stickler 2018 The Thesis Committee for Toni Maria Stickler Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Thesis: Theater Bootlegs: Discourses on Access and Class in Theater Fandom APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Suzanne Scott, Supervisor Kathryn Fuller-Seeley Theater Bootlegs: Discourses on Access and Class in Theater Fandom by Toni Maria Stickler Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin August 2018 Abstract Theater Bootlegs: Discourses on Access and Class in Theater Fandom Toni Maria Stickler, M.A. The University of Texas at Austin, 2018 Supervisor: Suzanne Scott This thesis contributes to the growing field of theater audience studies by focusing on a particular theater fan practice: recording and watching bootlegs. While scholars have extensively researched bootlegs of music concerts, bootlegs of theater have not been studied even though they are a crucial aspect of the contemporary theater fandom experience. This is a significant gap in understanding how audiences relate to theater, especially because theater as a medium is relatively expensive and inaccessible. This thesis frames bootlegs as filling a demand for greater access to professional theater and considers the political ramifications of their circulation. To this end, I examine the construction of theater as a “high class” medium and how prioritizing the “liveness” of theater contributes to its exclusivity. I examine how these conceptions of theater permeate the discourses of theater producers and performers who condemn the recording of bootlegs. Finally, a survey of the community of theater bootleg traders illuminates the tensions that currently exist for bootleg traders as they attempt to circulate bootlegs while avoiding unwanted attention from theater producers. iv Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Scope of Study ............................................................................................................3 The Big Picture ...........................................................................................................4 Material Limits to Theater Access ..................................................................7 Class and Taste Cultures .................................................................................8 The Ethics of Bootlegs: Major Discourses ...............................................................16 Liveness ........................................................................................................16 Intellectual Property ......................................................................................18 Chapter Overview .....................................................................................................19 Chapter One ..................................................................................................19 Chapter Two..................................................................................................19 Chapter Three................................................................................................20 Chapter 1: History of Bootlegging and Theater as High Culture ......................................22 Chapter 2: Discourses Against Bootlegging ......................................................................49 Case Study: Lin-Manuel Miranda.............................................................................61 Chapter 3: Bootleg Trading Community and Practices .....................................................73 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................100 Further Research .....................................................................................................103 Accessibility ................................................................................................103 Theater Fandom ..........................................................................................103 Piracy as fan practice ..................................................................................105 v Appendices .......................................................................................................................106 Appendix A: Survey Questions ..............................................................................106 Part One ......................................................................................................106 Part Two ......................................................................................................106 Appendix B: Example of Copyright Disclaimer.....................................................107 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................108 vi List of Figures Figure 1: Screencap of part of a bootleg list on a trading website. ..............................78 Figure 2: Example of tabs on a trading website. ..........................................................79 vii Introduction Only days after the hit musical Hamilton (2015) began preview performances at the Richard Rodgers theater on Broadway, an anonymous theater fan posted the following on the blogging site Tumblr: “here I am/patiently waiting for a bootleg of Hamilton/I mean it's been nine whole days what's the holdup?” Unfortunately for them, their query was responded to by the writer and composer of the musical himself—Lin- Manuel Miranda. He wrote: “Here I am. The composer. Actively rooting against you.” This interaction is just one of many instances where performers have called out fans recording bootlegs. Yet, the tone of the original post also suggests that bootlegs are normal and expected—at least in some parts of theater fandom. The desire for access to content that is not easily and legally available often structures how fans are able to relate to theater. Bootlegs exist as an answer to this demand but they are an illicit, underground, and not entirely satisfactory substitute for the actual live theater performance. Theater fandom, comprised of both those fans who seek out and watch bootlegs and those who do not, proliferates online on the same sites as fans of other properties. A quick search of a popular musical on Tumblr will reveal many common fan practices like fan fiction and fan-made gifsets. However, there is a crucial difference between theater fans and fans of, for instance, a television show. The actual content—the live show itself—is not available online, or at least it is not legally available in the way that TV or films are. Instead, theater productions provide some ancillary content like cast recordings and small promotional clips in order to placate the demand for access to the show. However, as the confrontation between this fan and Miranda shows, these promotional clips are not always enough for fans, who seek out bootlegs anyway. This desire for access and the mingling of theater fans and producers on social media then inevitably 1 produces conflict. Theater performers regularly speak out against recording bootlegs and insist that the only way fans can experience theater is by buying a ticket and attending a live performance. This doesn’t stop fans from seeking out bootlegs or from recording them. In fact, there is a longstanding underground online community surrounding the collection and trade of theater bootlegs—both video and audio recordings. This is similar in many ways to the practice of recording and collecting bootlegs of live music concerts—a practice that became relatively common in the 1970s surrounding rock musicians.1 The activities of music bootleggers has been well documented but theater bootlegging has gotten much less attention, and this thesis seeks to address this gap. Audio and video bootlegs of musicals and plays can be found on torrenting sites alongside pirated television and movies, but they are also traded among dedicated groups of theater fans using private emails. Some bootlegs make their way to YouTube before being subjected to takedown notices. The recording and sharing of bootlegs is a particularly controversial practice even within theater fandom itself. In many ways bootlegs serve to democratize the theater experience and allow individuals to see professional theater productions when they never could afford to otherwise. The debate among fans and theater performers on the ethics of bootlegging is inescapably related to how class circumscribes who can experience theater. This project focuses on bootlegs as a way to examine discourses surrounding issues of accessibility in theater and in fandom in the contemporary digital age. Issues of access are inevitably also about issues of class, and thus this thesis examines how theater has come to have a reputation as “highbrow” and how this affects the fan experience. 1 Clinton Heylin, Bootleg: The Secret History of the Other Recording Industry, 1st ed (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995), 60. 2 In this thesis I examine how bootlegs circulate among theater fans. This requires a special focus on those fans who are most invested in bootlegs: those who record and