International Conference

Biodiversity Informatics and the Barcode of Life

May 29-30, 2007 Aarhus, Denmark

PROGRAMME Date May 29-30, 2007 Time 9.00 - 23.00 / 09.00 - 17.00 Place Lakeside Lecture Theatres Sø-Auditorierne, Building 1252, Bartholins Allé, Aarhus University campus, 8000 Århus C

May 29 DNA BARCODING AND TAXONOMY

Chairpersons: Gitte Petersen (Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark) Henrik Balslev (Aarhus University, Denmark)

9.00 - 10.00 Registration with coffee & tea

10.00 - 11.00 Opening of the symposium

Keynote Lecturer: Quentin D. Wheeler (Arizona State University) DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy

Discussion

11.00 - 13.00 Rob DeSalle (American Museum of Natural History) The Use of DNA Barcoding in Taxonomy

Mark Blaxter (Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, UK) MOTU (Molecular Operational Taxonomic Unit) and Barcoding

Discussion

13.00 - 14.00 Lunch - in the auditorial building

14.00 - 15.30 Mark Y. Stoeckle (The Rockefeller University) ABBI (All Birds Barcoding Initiative) Prospects and Goals

Robert D. Ward (CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart) FISH-BOL (A Network to Assemble DNA Barcodes for 'All Fishes') – Prospects, Goals and Societal Importance

15.30 - 16.00 Coffee break

16.00 - 17.00 Robert Hanner (University of Guelph) A New Paradigm for Natural History Collections

Discussion

17.30 - 19.00 Poster session (with beer) - next to the Mathematical Canteen

19.00 - 23.00 Dinner - Mathematical Canteen (Building 1536, Ny Munkegade)

Dinner Speech: Morten Meldgaard (Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen)

May 30 DNA BARCODING, APPLICATIONS AND THE NORDIC PERSPECTIVE

Chairpersons: Ole Seberg (Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark) Finn Borchsenius (Aarhus University, Denmark)

9.00 - 10.00 Éamonn Ó Tuama (GBIF) DNA Barcoding and GBIF – Linking Barcode Information to Specimen Data

10.00 - 10.30 Coffee break

10.30 - 12.30 Liselotte W. Andersen (National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark) Possible applications of DNA barcoding in nature management: pros and cons

Aslak Jørgensen (DBL Institute for Health Research and Development) DNA Barcoding of schistosome intermediate host snails

Eske Willerslev (Niels Bohr Institute and Institute of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark) Ancient DNA and Barcoding

Gitte Petersen/Ole Seberg (The Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen) How many genes does it take to barcode a plant?

12.30 - 14.00 Lunch - in the auditorial building

14.00 - 15.00 Malin Strand (University of Gothenburg, Sweden) Barcoding and the inventory of Swedish marine invertebrates

Torbjørn Ekrem (Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Trondheim, Norway) DNA Barcoding: a valuable tool in taxonomy and identification of non-biting midges

15.00 - 15.30 Coffee break

15.30 - 16.30 Gunilla Ståhls-Mäkelä (Finnish Museum of Natural History) Barcoding and COI sequence variability: examples from flies and mayflies

Fredrik Ronquist (Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Sweden) DNA barcoding and the Swedish Taxonomy Initiative

16.30 - 17.00 Summing up by organisers SPEAKERS ABSTRACTS

Liselotte Wesley Andersen (Department of Wildlife Ecology and Biodiversity, Danish National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark)

Possible applications of DNA-barcoding in nature management: pros and cons

In connection with the implementation of the EU-Habitats Directive in Denmark and the following protection of the species on Annex II and IV, the Danish National Environmental Research Institute initiated genetic research to evaluate the conservation status of vulnerable species and hence, support management decisions. The definitions of DNA-barcoding spans widely. Both the more traditional view of sequencing conserved genes as CO1 or CytB for species-identification combined with the available knowledge and hypothesis addressed for the particular specimen will be discussed together with individual DNA-barcoding using several genetic markers for individual identification. Both examples of DNA-barcoding have been used in Danish nature management. Case-studies involving the European otter (Lutra lutra) and European tree frog (Hyla arborea) will be used to illustrate the DNA-barcoding application and its advantages and pitfalls.

Rob DeSalle (Curator of Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, USA)

The Use of DNA Barcoding in Taxonomy

Recent excitement over the development of an initiative to generate DNA sequences for all named species on the planet has igenerated areas of contention as to how this 'DNA barcoding' initiative should proceed. It is critical that these issues are clarified and resolved, before the use of DNA as a tool for taxonomy and species delimitation can be universalized. Currently, many of the published studies under this initiative have used tree building methods and more precisely distance approaches to the construction of the trees that are used to place certain DNA sequences into a taxonomic context. The classical taxonomic approach and the DNA approach will need to be reconciled in order for the 'DNA barcoding' initiative to proceed with any kind of community acceptance. In this talk we will discuss these major concerns generated around the DNA barcoding initiative and attempt to present a phylogenetic systematic framework for an improved barcoder as well as a taxonomic framework for interweaving classical taxonomy with the goals of 'DNA barcoding'.

Torbjørn Ekrem (Section of Natural History, Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Trondheim, Norway)

DNA Barcoding: a valuable tool in taxonomy and identification of non-biting midges Torbjørn Ekrem, Endre Willassen & Elisabeth Stur

Non-biting midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) usually are the most abundant and species rich insects in freshwater ecosystems and they are frequently used as indicators of environmental conditions in biological monitoring of freshwaters. However, limited knowledge of larval taxonomy, restricted access to taxonomic expertise, and meticulous procedures for species identification are impediments both for the detailed knowledge on the biology of these insects and for the potentially wider use of chironomids in monitoring of fresh water resources. Consequently, a system for rapid species identification and life stage association by comparisons of short gene sequences (i.e. DNA barcoding) would be useful to both systematic and ecological studies on Chironomidae. This talk will present results from a recent study where we explored the prospects of DNA barcoding on non- biting midges. Our results show that COI from 98% of the sampled specimens could be amplified from different life stages using the standard Folmer et al. (1994) primers (LCO1490 & HCO2198) and that interspecific genetic distances exceeded intraspecific distances for all species. Thus, DNA barcodes can be used to identify species that are already in a COI library. However, the results from the neighbour joining and parsimony analyses did not otherwise reflect trustworthy phylogenetic relationships between the species examined, and DNA barcodes appeared unreliable for approximate identification when sequences of the unknown taxon are absent from the COI library. Nevertheless, it would be relatively quick and inexpensive to create a COI library of the most common chironomid species. Once established, a library of DNA barcodes will not only assist in rapid and accurate identification of chironomid larvae, but also in identifying taxonomic entities that deserve more thorough morphological, ecological and genetic analyses by an integrative approach. We are now in the process of generating a DNA library of European and Canadian non-biting midges. Our projects currently hold about 500 sequences of approximately 200 species. We have already recognized several species that putatively are new to science and also taxonomic groups that are in desperate need of revision.

Robert Hanner (Associate Director, Canadian Barcode of Life Network, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario & Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Canada)

A New Paradigm for Natural History Collections

Biological specimen collections exist for many reasons, from museum voucher specimens documenting the application of names, to commercial and industrial collections that underpin modern biotechnology. With today’s technology, they all represent potentially accessible “genetic resource collections” awaiting characterization. DNA sequencing offers an efficient means of direct comparison across all such collections, a process that could bring systematic breadth and rigor to genetic databases, drive digitization of collection records and generate libraries of reference sequences for species identification. This talk will examine the role of emerging genetic characterization, annotation and information dissemination standards for developing an accessible network of biorepositories capable of supporting multidisciplinary research. Broad-based implementation of such standards would benefit the user community by creating an index of taxonomically validated genetic resources, while also enabling calculation of a repository impact factor to justify ongoing support of the collections. While traditional collections can be valuable sources of genetic data, natural history museums must also consider the collection, preservation and archival of genomic resources as an integral part of their mission to document life on earth.

Aslak Jørgensen (The Mandahl-Barth Research Centre for Biodiversity and Health, DBL - Centre for Health Research and Development, Institute of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark)

DNA barcoding of schistosome intermediate host snails – the CONTRAST project

Schistosomiasis (snail fever) infects app. 200 million people in Africa, Eastern Asia and South America and is caused by parasitic trematodes in the genus Schistosoma. To complete their lifecycle the parasites need intermediate snail hosts for the development of miracidia into cercaria. Both prosobranch and pulmonate snails can act as intermediate hosts. In Africa only pulmonate snails in the genera Biomphalaria and Bulinus act as intermediate hosts of Schistosoma. Biomphalaria and Bulinus belong to two distant evolutionary lineages of planorbid snails (Planorbinae and Bulininae) and are infected by different species of schistosomes. In Africa Biomphalaria currently has 12 recognized species, which can all be intermediate host for the Schistosoma mansoni parasite. Two major evolutionary lineages are currently recognized with 1-2 species in the B. pfeifferi species group and the rest in the Nilotic species complex. The species show relatively little interspecific DNA sequence variation, convergent shell evolution and the capacity of reproduction by self- fertilization. Within the six species of the Nilotic species complex currently investigated the maximum COI sequence variation is 3.3%, and the COI variation between the two evolutionary lineages is up to 6.5%. The intraspecific variation has only been estimated for 16S (0.4%) and ND1 (2.3%) in Biomphalaria pfeifferi. Bulinus currently consists of app. 30 recognized species in four major evolutionary lineages and not all species act as intermediate hosts of Schistosoma parasites. The Bulinus species show pronounced plasticity of the shells. Most, if not all, species of Bulinus have the capacity of reproduction by self-fertilization. Within Bulinus DNA sequences of internal transcribed spacer (ITS), 16S rDNA and a small (400 bp) fragment of COI have been used for preliminary species discrimination. The COI sequence variation of the Bulinus reticulatus species group is unknown. The average COI sequence variation within the Bulinus africanus and the B. forskalii species groups are 11.3% and 12.2%, respectively. However, the Bulinus truncatus/tropicus species complex show low COI sequence variation (average 2.9% with a maximum of 9.4%) and might be a recently evolved group. This complex has many examples of speciation by ploidy and the taxonomy has been further complicated by the recognition of species described mainly on enzyme electrophoretic evidence. The degree of intraspecific variation has not been estimated and analyses of COI sequences from GenBank result in some non-monophyletic species. However, the four major evolutionary lineages are inferred by both COI and 16S. In October 2006 CONTRAST, a large EU funded project, was launched with one of its workpackages focusing on DNA barcoding of schistosomes and intermediate host snails in Africa. During the CONTRAST project Biomphalaria and Bulinus snails will be extensively collected in Cameroon, Kenya, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia, and these collections will be supplemented by the collections held at DBL and The Natural History Museum, London. The main objective of the snail work of CONTRAST is to create an international standardized molecular nomenclature based upon DNA barcoding and selected microsatellite loci for classification of genetic variation within schistosome snail hosts.

Éamonn Ó Tuama (GBIF Secretariat, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen)

DNA Barcoding and GBIF - Linking Barcode Information to Specimen Data

The vision of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) is to make the world's biodiversity data freely accessible and universally available to all. It achieves this by establishing and promoting an ever-growing network of data-contributing participant nodes distributed around the world and maintaining a central indexing service which provides the core functionality for the GBIF Data Portal and various web services which rely on the central index. In its first development phase (2001-2006), GBIF concentrated on primary species-occurrence data, that is, specimens held in museum and other collections, as well as observational records. As of April 2007, GBIF is serving more than 120,000,000 records from 1017 collections managed by 199 data providers. Now, as it moves into its next phase, GBIF has prioritised particular areas for development, amongst which are the inclusion of other data types within the GBIF Data Portal. These include both genomic and ecosystem data. DNA barcode data is thus a very appropriate resource for integration into the GBIF portal where it can be cross-referenced to other species data and also provide a novel and valuable contribution to integrative taxonomy. This presentation provides an overview of the GBIF information architecture and the services built upon it. It emphasises the importance of community standards for biodiversity data, particularly those developed under the aegis of the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) group. It examines the proposed standard from the Database Working Group for the Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) for dealing with barcode records held in the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration and their linkage to voucher specimens through use of a Globally Unique Identifier (GUID) system. Life Science Identifiers (LSIDs) are highlighted as one particular GUID standard promoted by BIS (TDWG) and GBIF that provide persistent, globally unique identifiers for biological data thus facilitating sharing and re-use. Their integration in the BARCODE record system is explored.

Gitte Petersen & Ole Seberg (Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen)

How many genes does it take to barcode a plant?

At present there is no standard protocol for barcoding land plants. COI and all other mitochondrial genes are highly conserved across land plants, thus providing limited discriminative power. The most variable sequences in land plants are probably found in the nucleus: However, the high frequency of polyploidy or other partial duplications of the genome, and the unlikely possibility of producing universal primers will make it highly problematic to develop an easily applicable system for amplification of unique nuclear sequences. Therefore, efforts are focused on sequences from the plastid genome. However, no single plastid sequence is variable enough in all lineages of land plants to facilitate species recognition. A novel suggestion, which will be submitted to CBOL, proposes a “triplet” plant barcode consisting of three sequences. At least in some lineages it is shown that the most variable protein coding sequences are more variable than non-coding regions. Being less prone to length mutations, protein coding sequences also have analytical advantages. Thus, the triplet will either include only protein coding sequences, or include two coding and one non-coding region. However, in some genera not even three sequences will be enough to distinguish all species.

Fredrik Ronquist (Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden)

DNA Barcoding and the Swedish Taxonomy Initiative

The Swedish Taxonomy Initiative (Svenska Artprojektet), launched in 2002, aims to complete the inventory of the Swedish fauna and flora within 20 years. The project involves massive collecting efforts, taxonomic research, and the production of a comprehensive national biodiversity encyclopedia (Nationalnyckeln till Sveriges Flora och Fauna). Two large field inventories are underway: A survey of Swedish marine habitats and a terrestrial Malaise trapping project. These, and other activities within the Swedish Taxonomy Initiative, now provide access to fresh material of a large portion of the Swedish flora and fauna. Although this creates an ideal opportunity for DNA barcoding, this is not a given priority within the project. First, effective selection of specimens for DNA barcoding requires traditional taxonomic work, so barcoding does not speed up the inventory. Second, although DNA barcoding is a powerful resource for species identification, it is not foolproof so, again, it needs to be complemented with more traditional identification aids. Third, future monitoring of the Swedish flora and fauna will undoubtedly remain, to a large extent, in the hands of amateur naturalists. They seem unlikely to have access to DNA barcoding equipment in the near future; in fact, even if cheap DNA barcoders became available, they would probably still prefer traditional identification aids because of the intellectual satisfaction involved in species recognition.

Mark Stoeckle (Adjunct Faculty, Program for the Human Environment, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA)

All Birds Barcoding Initiative (ABBI) update

Birds are among the most conspicuous and well-studied groups of animals, yet genetic surveys including with DNA barcoding suggest there are hundreds of as yet undescribed species. All Birds Barcoding Initiative (ABBI) aims to collect DNA barcodes from the approximately 10,000 species of known birds and speed discovery of new species, establishing an electronic library that links barcodes, reference specimens in collections, and associated collection data. As of May 2007 there are over 8000 barcodes representing 1700 species deposited in Barcode of Life Database (BOLD), including most North American species, with recent infusion of barcodes contributed by institutions in Central and South America. Interest from individuals and institutions in Europe, Africa, East and Southeast Asia promise additional growth. Surprisingly, over 3000 world birds are not represented in existing avian tissue collections, particularly Afrotropical and Indomalayan avifauna, but also Palearctic and Nearctic species. The avian barcode library will be a valuable resource for conservation planners, ornithologists, ecologists, public health officials, and the interested public. Once the library is established, DNA barcoding can be applied by interested persons to confirm identification regardless of age, sex, or plumage, including from individual feathers. Comparison of avian barcode data with that from other vertebrate and invertebrate taxa suggests common patterns of diversity. Mapping a single locus across the diversity of animal life, ie DNA barcoding, may provide new insights into processes that form and maintain species.

Malin Strand & Per Sundberg (Göteborg University, Department of Zoology, Systematics and Biodiversity, Box 463 Göteborg, Sweden)

Marine inventories and DNA barcoding

The Swedish Taxonomy Initiative is currently undertaking marine inventories in its effort to catalogue the Swedish fauna. Marine fauna consists of many phyla, which poses problems when it comes to identifying the collected specimens. Since it is impossible to have experts covering all possible taxa on board the ship, one often has to rely on post identification of preserved material. For many taxonomic groups this make identification difficult or in some cases impossible. It is therefore common in marine monitoring programmes to see that animals are only identified to phylum. This will of course give an inaccurate measurement of biodiversity, and will also risk hiding changes in the faunal composition. We discuss whether DNA barcoding could be used for identifying species in preserved bulk samples, and show an example of how it can work. We furthermore discuss potential problems with barcoding of marine invertebrates.

Gunilla Ståhls-Mäkelä (Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland)

Barcoding and COI sequence variability: examples from flies and mayflies

Studies to test the utility and informativeness of COI sequences for morphologically similar species groups in different genera of Diptera (Syrphidae) and Ephemeroptera (Baetidae) are presented. For Syrphidae, a 750 bp fragment of the 3’-end of COI has routinely been used for taxonomic purposes. The sequence variability of equally large sequence fragments of both the 5’ and 3’ end of COI were hence compared for particular species groups. Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 sequences were generated as additional barcodes. COI hypotheses were evaluated against morphological species concepts, but taxonomic decisions integrated all available characters. In cases where morphological species could not be diagnosed due to invariant COI sequences, or numbers of COI haplotypes was large and/or partially informative, ITS2 sequences often proved informative. Molecular data were invaluable in assisting taxonomic decision-making, but it is evident that both taxonomic studies and identification of taxa based on DNA sequences (barcodes) benefits highly from extensive back-ground studies screening specimens over wide geographic distributions.

Robert D. Ward (CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia)

FISH-BOL (A Network to Assemble DNA Barcodes for ‘All Fishes’) – Prospects, Goals and Societal Importance

The Fish Barcode of Life campaign, FISH-BOL (www.fishbol.org), is a global effort to assembly a standardised searchable web-based DNA sequence library for all fish species, derived from voucher specimens with authoritative taxonomic identifications. The benefits of barcoding fishes include facilitating species identification for all potential users, including taxonomists, highlighting specimens that represent a range expansion of known species, flagging previously unrecognised species, and perhaps most importantly, enabling identifications where traditional methods are not readily applicable. The latter include identifications of fillets, fins, eggs and larvae. There are about 30,000 species of fish world-wide, about 16,000 marine and 13,000 freshwater. The FISH- BOL campaign began in 2005 and has thus far barcoded some 18,000 individuals from nearly 4,000 species. Of the first 500 Australian fish species examined, only two pairs of species could not be discriminated. These rare instances either reflect imperfect taxonomy (i.e. the characteristics used to separate these taxa do not reflect true species differentiation), hybridisation, or very recent speciation. This talk will describe the aims and organization of FISH-BOL, and will demonstrate some of its achievements. Examples will be given of likely species discovery triggered by barcoding results, and its uses in fisheries management. The latter examples will focus on the ability of barcoding to discriminate among species of tuna that can be difficult to identify morphologically, and its use in identifying shark species from confiscated catches of illegally-taken shark fins. The FISH-BOL campaign is a public-good project will benefit conservation, fisheries management, fish retailing, and fisheries and marine ecology.

Quentin D. Wheeler (Director, International Institute for Species Exploration, Arizona State University, USA)

DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy

What is the appropriate relation between DNA barcoding and taxonomy? Is DNA barcoding best regarded as a component of an integrated approach to taxonomy or as a replacement or surrogate for taxonomy? To answer these questions, it is appropriate that we ask some even more fundamental questions about the goals of taxonomy and the factors that make taxonomy in general “good” or “bad”. Given a clear concept of what “good” taxonomy looks like, it is possible to assess the logical contributions and potential roles of DNA barcoding within taxonomy. It is concluded that the urgent need for rapid and accurate species identifications by fields outside taxonomy indicates the need to invest in “good” fundamental taxonomy and to avoid overextending the reach of any single technique or data source. Increasing demand for new applied taxonomy (identification) tools is a justification to expand support for integrative taxonomy, not an excuse to supplant “good” taxonomy with expedient alternatives.

Eske Willerslev (Centre for Ancient Genetics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark)

Ancient DNA and Barcoding

DNA barcoding should provide rapid, accurate and automatable species identifications by using a standardized DNA region as a tag. However, this is difficult to find especially when dealing with fossil remains where the DNA is highly degraded. Here I evaluate the plant chloroplast trnL intron P6 loop, (10-143 bp) as a possible ancient DNA barcoding marker. Based on sequences available in GenBank and sequences produced using a new universal primer set, the species resolution is found to be about 19.5%. The resolution is much higher in specific contexts such as species originating from a single ecosystem, or commonly eaten plants. For the Arctic community, where we have recently sequenced the whole chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron (254-767 bp) for about 1000 species the species resolution for P6 is about 50%. If amplification and identification based on the P6 loop is followed by that targeting of specific substitution in the trnL (UAA) intron the species ID could increase to maybe 80-90%. Thus, the trnL intron P6 loop gives a much higher resolution than the chloroplast rbcl region commonly used in ancient DNA studies. POSTER ABSTRACTS

Establishing DNA-Barcoding Methods in Diatoms for Diversity Assessments B. Gemeinholzer, N. Enke & R. Jahn Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany

Microscopic algae are important bio-indicators to monitor water quality as they are sensitive to pollution and contamination, trophies, as well as acidification, and salinisation. Diatoms are especially suited for water quality assessments as it is the only group of microscopic algae which is present in all water sources. Continuous screening of algal biodiversity can provide information about threatened ecosystem. Thus diatoms are an ideal model group to establish DNA-Barcoding methods to provide an easy to use, quick, efficient, standardised organism identification tool to serve routine water quality assessments, as morphological identification is time consuming and demands specialised in-depth knowledge. Method optimisation is the main task of this project. A pilot study was carried out by identifying diatoms by light microscope from a water sample from the Tegeler See in Berlin/Germany. Total genomic DNA was isolated from the same sample, the 18S region was amplified using diatom specific priming sites and the fragments were cloned, picked, and sequenced. The sequences were checked against a molecular reference database (AlgaTerra). 62 different diatom species could be identified by means of light microscopy; in the same sample 59 species were detected by DNA-Barcoding methods. However, results were not completely congruent in both methods; but most taxa identified by molecular means were known to occur potentially in the sample site. This elucidates the potential of DNA-Barcoding for diversity and water quality assessments; but as well shows the need for standardised and optimised laboratory protocols. In subsequent trials, primer screenings were carried out to find a more suitable region for DNA Barcoding in diatoms, different (nondestructive) DNA extraction methods were applied and up to now, nothing is known about the number of clones required to completely cover the diatom diversity in fresh water samples.

The use of DNA Barcoding in Forensic Entomology in Poland Tadeusz Malewski, Agnieszka Draber-Monko, Wieslaw Bogdanowicz Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

A carrion-fly maggot is the most common type of insect evidence collected during investigation of dead body. Determining the species composition of such sample is an important first step in a forensic entomological analysis. Although species-diagnostic anatomical characters have been reported for the eggs and early larvae of some taxa, an anatomical approach is rather difficult to apply for immature stages of several taxa. Mitochondrial DNA can be used in species identification of all life stages of a carrion fly. Recent study of the COI gene has identified as many as 45 regions that distinguish species of the three "forensic" genera of blowflies (family Calliphoridae) - Lucilla, Calliphora and Chrysomya. In Poland there are 66 species of blowflies of which twelve are of forensic value. In our institute we collected specimens and prepared reference DNA samples of all forensically important Calliphoridae. Most of these have been sequenced, and this information is available for use by police and other investigative agencies. Based on results we obtained it will be possible to design the sequence-specific probes. Moreover, beyond the applications to forensic entomology, an understanding of the COI sequences of Calliphoridae may be also treated as a valuable addition to the DNA barcoding initiative.

Turning Sequences into Taxa Jenna Mann, Mark Blaxter Institute of Evolutionary Biology, Edinburgh University, UK

Most animal taxa can be classified as meiofauna (body length less than 1mm). The number of meiofaunal ‘species’ is unknown, but is likely to be in the millions. In the absence of large communities of Linnaean taxonomists dedicated to meiofauna, how can these organisms be identified, taxonomised and analysed? We can acquire DNA barcode data from individual meiofaunal specimens. In most instances we do not have exemplar specimens identified to species, nor do we expect to be able to get sequence from type specimens. So how can we identify taxa independent of external reference samples? We generated a congruent barcode dataset for cytochrome oxidase 1 (CO1), large and small ribosomal subunits (LSU and SSU respectively) from a set of unidentified rhabditid nematodes. Here we investigate the use of different genes and methods in defining molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTU) in this nematode fauna. PARTICIPANTS LIST Name Institution Address Liselotte W. Andersen National Environmental Research Grenåvej 14, 8410 Rønde Senior Scientist Institute Denmark Henrik Balslev Aarhus University Ny Munkegade, Build. 1540, Professor 8000 Århus C Denmark Anders S. Barfod University of Aarhus Ny Munkegade, 1540, 8000 Århus C Ass. Professor Denmark Wojciech Bieniek Polish Academy of Sciences Lubicz 46, POL-31512 Krakow M.Sc. Poland Stine Bjorholm Aarhus University Ny Munkegade, 8000 Århus C Phd-student Denmark Mark Blaxter University of Edinburgh Ashworth Laboratories, King's Buildings, University Professor GBR-EH93JT Edinburgh United Kingdom Finn Borchsenius Aarhus University Building 137, Universitetsparken, Ass. Professor 8000 Århus C Denmark Isabel Calabuig EDIT Universitetsparken 15, Project Manager Natural History Museum of Denmark, 2100 København Ø University of Copenhagen Denmark Mihail-Constantin Carausu DanBIF Universitetsparken 15, M.Sc.(Eng.), Systems Natural History Museum of Denmark, 2100 København Ø Developer University of Copenhagen Denmark Thomas Cedhagen University of Aarhus Finlandsgade 14, 8200 Århus N Associate Professor Denmark Jakob Damgaard University of Copenhagen Gothersgade 140, 1123 København K Denmark Lucia de la Torre Aarhus University Ny Munkegade, Building 1137, PhD Student 8000 Århus C Denmark Rob DeSalle American Museum of Natural History 79th Street at Central Park West, Curator USA-10024 New York, NY United States Peter Desmet Belgian Biodiversity Platform Bld du Triomphe, ULB Plaine, CP 257, Data Acquisition Manager BEL-1050 Brussels Belgium Ursula Eberhardt Centraalbureau voor Uppsalalaan 8, NLD-3584 CT Utrecht Schimmelcultures Netherlands Torbjørn Ekrem Museum of Natural History and Erling Skakkes Gata 47a, Senior Curator Archaeology NOR-7012 Trondheim Norway Lotte Endsleff DanBIF Universitetsparken 15, M.Sc., PR & Scientific Natural History Museum of Denmark, 2100 København Ø Liaison Officer University of Copenhagen Denmark Neela Enke Freie Universität Berlin Königin-Luise-strasse 6-8, PhD Student DEU-14195 Berlin Germany Søren Faurby University of Aarhus Ny Munkegade, building 1540, PhD 8000 Århus C Denmark Camilla Flojgaard University of Aarhus P.P. Ørumsgade 6, 3. th., 8000 Århus C Student Denmark Ole Folmer DIFRES - Danish Institute For Charlottenlund Slot, 2920 Charlottenlund M.Sc., biologist Fisheries Research Denmark

Tina Fredsted University of Aarhus Ny Munkegade, build. 1540, Ph.D. student 8000 Århus C Denmark Peter Funch University of Aarhus Ny Munkegade, building 1540, Associate Professor 8000 Århus C Denmark Sylvia Gerritsma University of Copenhagen Universitetsparken 15, building 12, Master Student 2100 København Ø Denmark Vladimir Gusarov University of Oslo P.O. Box 1172, NO-0318 Oslo Curator of Entomology Norway Mats H.G. Gustafsson University of Aarhus Ny Munkegade, building 1504, Associate Professor 8000 Århus C Denmark Robert Hanner University of Guelph Guelph, CAN-N1G 2W1 Guelph Professor Canada Lars Nørgaard Hansen University of Copenhagen Hørsholm Kongevej 11, 2970 Hørsholm Biologist Denmark Michael Møller Hansen Technical University of Denmark Vejlsøvej 39, 8600 Silkeborg Professor Denmark Sandie Hansen Aarhus University Ny Munkegade, 8000 Århus C Student Denmark Christoffer Bugge Harder University of Copenhagen Store Kannikestræde 2, M.Sc. student 1169 København K Denmark Andre Heughebaert Belgian Biodiversity Platform Bld du Triomphe, ULB Plaine, Node Manager CP 257, BEL-1050 Brussels Belgium Lone K. Hübschmann University of Aarhus Ny Munkegade, build. 1540, M.Sc. Student 8000 Århus C Denmark Angkhana Inta Chiang Mai University Suthep rd., THA-50200 Chiang Mai Student Thailand Arild Johnsen University of Oslo P.O. Box 1172, NOR-0318 Oslo Dr. Norway Annemarie Fejer Justesen University of Aarhus Forsøgsvej 1, 4200 Slagelse Senior Scientist Denmark Aslak Jørgensen DBL Institute for Health Research and Jaegersborg Allé 1 D, Project Researcher Development 2920 Charlottenlund Denmark Tina Jørgensen University of Copenhagen Sølvgade 83, opgang S, Cand.scient. 1307 København K Denmark Carsten Thure Kirkeby University of Copenhagen Gothersgade 140, 1123 København K Denmark Niels P. Kristensen Natural History Museum of Denmark Universitetsparken 15, Professor, Curator 2100 København Ø Denmark Thomas K. Kristensen The Mandahl-Bart Research Center Jægersborg Allé 1D, Professor for Biodiversity and Health 2920 Charlottenlund Denmark Thea Kristiansen Aarhus University Ny Munkegade, 8000 Århus C Student Denmark Fang Kullander Swedish Museum of Natural History Frescativägen 4, SWE-10405 Stockholm PhD Sweden Christian Lange DanBIF Universitetsparken 15, M.Sc., Node Manager Natural History Museum of Denmark, 2100 København Ø University of Copenhagen Denmark Nina Laurenne Finnish Museum of Natural History PO. Box 26 (Teollisuuskatu 23), FIN- 00014 Helsinki Finland Jan T. Lifjeld University of Oslo PO Box 1172 Blindern, NOR-0316 Oslo Professor Norway Thomas Lyrholm Swedish Museum of Natural History Box 50007, SWE-10405 Stockholm Sweden Tadeusz Malewski Museum and Institute of Zoology Wilcza 64, POL-00-679 Warsaw PhD, DSc Poland Jenna Mann University of Edinburgh Ashworth Laboratories. Kings Building, PhD Student GBR-EH9 3JT Edinburgh United Kingdom Morten Meldgaard Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, Director University of Copenhagen 2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark Mogens Nicolaisen University of Aarhus Forsøgsvej 1, 4200 Slagelse Senior scientist Denmark Signe Normand University of Aarhus Ny Munkegade, Build. 1540, 8000 Århus PhD student C Denmark Maria Vibe Norup Natural History Museum of Denmark Sølvgade 83, opg. S, PhD student University of Copenhagen 1307 København K Denmark Éamonn Ò Tuama GBIF Universitetsparken 15, GBIF DADI programme 2100 København Ø officer Denmark Dennis Pedersen Aarhus University Ny Munkegade, 8000 Århus C Student Denmark Gitte Petersen Natural History Museum of Denmark Sølvgade 83, Opg. S Professor University of Copenhagen 1307 København K Denmark Fredrik Pleijel Göteborg University SWE-45296 Strömstad Professor Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory Sweden Pimwadee University of Aarhus Building 1137, Universitetsparken, Pornpongrungrueng 8000 Århus C PhD Student Denmark Axel Dalberg Poulsen University of Copenhagen Rolighedsvej 21, 1958 Frederiksberg C Dr. Denmark Arne Redsted Rasmussen The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Esplanaden 34, 1263 København K Associate Professor Arts Denmark Fredrik Ronquist The Swedish Museum of Natural Frescativägen 40, SWE-10405 Professor History Stockholm Sweden Ole Seberg Natural History Museum of Denmark Sølvgade 83, 1307 København K Professor, dr. scient. University of Copenhagen Denmark Mita Eva Sengupta The Mandahl-Bart Research Center Jægersborg Alle 1D, Master Student for Biodiversity and Health 2920 Charlottenlund Denmark Flemming Skov NERI - National Environmental Grenåvej 14, 8410 Rønde Head of Section Research Institute Denmark Alexey Solodovnikov Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, University of Copenhagen 2100 København Ø Denmark Jesper Stenderup University of Copenhagen Universitetsparken 15, 2100 København Ø Denmark Mark Young Stoeckle The Rockefeller University 1230 York Avenue, Box 234 PhD, Adjunct Faculty USA10021-6399 Member Malin Strand Systematics and Biodiversity Tjärnö marine lab, SE 452 96 Strömstad PhD Göteborg University Sweden Gunilla Ståhls-Mäkelä Finnish Museum of Natural History Teollisuuskatu 23. PL 26, Dr., Researcher FIN-00014 Helsinki Finland Jens-Christian Svenning University of Aarhus Ny Munkegade 1540, 8000 Århus C Associate Professor Denmark Agnieszka Sztorc Polish Academy of Sciences Lubicz 46, POL-31512 Krakow M.Sc. Poland Philip Francis Thomsen University of Copenhagen Juliane Maries Vej 30, Master Student 2100 København Ø Denmark Beatriz Torres GBIF Universitetsparken 15, Senior Programme Officer 2100 København Ø for Outreach and Capacity Denmark Building Philipp Trenel Aarhus University Herbarium, build. 1137, Universitetsparken, 8200 Århus N Denmark Robert D. Ward CSIRO Gastray Esplanade GPO Box 1538, PhD, Senior Geneticist AUS-7001 Hobart Australia Quentin D. Wheeler Arizona State University PO Box 876505 Professor USA-AZ85287-6505 Benedikte Løhr Wilken The Mandhal-Bart Research Center Jægersborg Alle 1 D, Technician for Biodiversity and Health 2920 Charlottenlund Denmark Eske Willerslev Niels Bohr Institute and Institute of Juliane Maries Vej 30, Professor Biology 2100 København Ø Denmark Benjamin Øllgaard University of Aarhus Universitetsparken, 8000 Århus C Associate Professor Denmark