The Conservative Party, Policy Change, and Europe: 1997-2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Conservative Party, Policy Change, and Europe: 1997-2016 The Conservative Party, Policy Change, and Europe: 1997-2016 Tristan Martin To be submitted for the qualification of Doctor of Philosophy School of Geography, Politics and Sociology Newcastle University May 2019 i ii Abstract This thesis provides an analysis of policy change in the Conservative Party on the question of European integration between 1997 and 2016. The thesis answers two principal research questions. Firstly, in what ways did European policy change in the Conservative Party between May 1997 and February 2016? Secondly, what caused these changes in European policy and how can they be understood in relation to exogenous and endogenous factors? It answers these questions through a qualitative analysis of 36 original interviews with party elites, 119 speeches, 267 parliamentary statements, 290 newspaper articles, and nine manifestoes. Additionally, it has drawn on secondary quantitative survey data from Ipsos Mori, YouGov, and the British Social Attitudes Survey. It concludes that policy has moved incrementally over the period from a minimalist-Soft Eurosceptic position to a more revisionist-Soft Eurosceptic position with Hard Eurosceptic elements. Policy experienced periods of both stability and volatility depending on the internal and external political context. Theoretically, it advances an approach centred upon new institutionalist theories. It argues this better accounts for the underlying processes and mechanisms behind policy change in political parties. In doing so it provides an integrated approach which can be applied to the future study of policy change in other political parties. This thesis makes an original contribution to both the literature on the Conservative Party and European integration, and policy change in political parties more widely. It does so by providing an empirically systematic and theoretically informed analysis of the development of European policy, an approach lacking in previous research, covering a period in which changes in policy over Europe in the Conservative Party would contribute directly to the June 2016 EU Referendum. As such, it also makes an important contribution to our understanding of the UK’s historical path towards Brexit. iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank all the academic and professional staff, and PGR colleagues past and present, at the School of Geography, Politics, and Sociology for all their help and advice while I have completed this thesis. Special thanks, of course, go to Dr Nick Randall and Dr Alistair Clark for being my supervisors. Additionally, I would also like to express my gratitude to anyone else who might have given me support or guidance over the past four years. Family, friends, and random people I have now forgotten the names of. I have appreciated all of it, even if it didn’t look like it at the time. I would also like to acknowledge the life of Professor Hugh Berringtion (1928-2010). Professor Berrington was a former Head of Department in Politics at Newcastle University and pioneered many approaches to the study of politics and political behaviour. Without the financial support provided by the scholarship established in his name, and the many generous individuals that contributed to it, I would not have been able to carry out this research. This thesis is dedicated to his memory, academic legacy, and family. Tristan Martin March 2019 iv ‘Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view’ Obi-Wan Kenobi – Star Wars: Episode VI – Return of the Jedi (1983) v Contents Abstract page iii Acknowledgements iv List of Tables and Figures ix-x Summary xi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Thesis scope 2 1.2 Research methods and data collection 2 1.3 Structure of the thesis 5 1.4 Original contribution and key findings 6 Chapter 2: Change in Political Parties 10 2.1 Change in Political Parties 10 2.2 Endogenous Causes of Party Change 14 2.3 Exogenous Causes of Party Change 20 2.4 Conclusion 28 Chapter 3: Theoretical Framework: New Institutionalism 30 3.1 New Institutionalism 31 3.2 A New Institutionalist Framework of Institutional Change 38 3.3 Mechanisms 42 3.4 Conclusion 53 Chapter 4: Conservative Party and Europe, 1997-2016: Analysis of Change 54 4.1 Categorising Party-based Euroscepticism 54 4.2 May 1997-June 2001 59 4.3 June 2001- May 2005 64 4.4 May 2005 – May 2010 71 4.5 May 2010 – May 2015 74 4.6 May 2015 – February 2016 82 4.7 Conclusion 86 Chapter 5: Europe and Policy Change under Hague, 1997-2001 91 5.1 Historical Legacies 91 5.2 Rival Political Parties 98 5.3 Ideological Composition of the Conservative Party 102 5.4 Critical Junctures 107 5.5 Public Opinion 112 5.6 Domestic Political Context 120 vi 5.7 Internal Political Context 124 5.8 Pressure Groups 127 5.9 Individual Actors 128 5.10 Media 132 5.11 Conclusion 133 Chapter 6: Duncan-Smith to Howard – Policy Change and Europe, 2001-2005 136 6.1 Historical Legacies 136 6.2 Ideological Composition of the Conservative Party 139 6.3 Rival Political Parties 145 6.4 Public Opinion 150 6.5 Domestic Political Context 153 6.6 International Political Context 156 6.7 Individual Actors 157 6.8 Conclusion 165 Chapter 7: Cameron in Opposition – Policy Change and Europe, 2005-2010 167 7.1 Historical Legacies 167 7.2 Ideological Composition of the Conservative Party 172 7.3 Rival Political Parties 179 7.4 Public Opinion 185 7.5 Domestic Political Context 188 7.6 International Political Context 190 7.7 Individual Actors 195 7.8 Conclusion 199 Chapter 8: Cameron in Government – Policy Change and Europe, 2010-2016 201 8.1 Historical Legacies – 1997-2010 202 8.2 The 2010 General Election and the Coalition Agreement 206 8.3 Ideological Composition of the Conservative Party 212 8.4 Public Opinion 220 8.5 Rival Political Parties 224 8.6 Domestic Political Context 229 8.7 International Political Context 232 8.8 Factions and Tendencies 233 8.9 Individual Political Actors 239 8.10 Conclusion 241 Chapter 9: Conclusion 243 9.1 Endogenous/Exogenous causes of Policy Change in Context 243 9.2 Contribution of the New Institutionalist Approach 246 9.3 Applying the Approach to other Examples 249 9.4 Conservative European Policy 1997-2016 and Brexit 250 9.5 Implications for Future Research 251 Appendix: List of Interviewees 253 vii Bibliography 256 viii List of Tables and Figures Tables 4.1 Conservative Eurosceptic Spectrum page 56 4.2 Hall’s Orders of Policy Change 56 5.1 Conservative MPs in the 1997-2001 Shadow Cabinet 105 5.2 UK Voters and Euroscepticism, 1992-1997 112 5.3 UK Public Attitudes towards the Euro, 1992-1997 113 5.4 UK Voters’ Positions on Major Issues (Mean Scores), 1992-1997 114 6.1 UK Public Attitudes towards the EU, 2001-2005 151 7.1 MP Ballots: Conservative Party Leadership Election, 2005 170 7.2 Conservative Member’s Attitude to European Integration, June 2009 178 7.3 UK Public Attitudes towards the EU, 2005-2013 185 8.1 UK Public Attitudes towards the EU, 2008-2016 221 ix Figures 1.1 Levels of Change page 11 5.1 Conservative Voters’ Attitudes Towards EU Membership, 1987-97 115 5.2 UK Voters saying Europe No1 Issue, 1992-2001 117 5.3 UK Public Attitude towards the Euro, 1991-2001 119 5.4 UK Party Leader Satisfaction Ratings, 1997-2001 121 5.5 UK Voting Intention, May 1997-June 2001 122 5.6 ‘Best Party on Key Issue’: Europe, 1997-2001 123 6.1 UK Public Attitude towards the Euro, 2001-2005 152 6.2 UK Voters saying Europe No1 Issue, 2001-2005 153 6.3 UK Party Leader Satisfaction Ratings, 2001-2005 155 6.4 ‘Best Party of Key Issue’: Europe, 2001-2005 156 7.1 UK Public saying Immigration No1 Issue, 2004-2012 183 7.2 UK Voting Intention, 2005-2010 184 7.3 UK Public Attitudes towards the EU, 1992-2015 186 7.4 UK Public saying Europe No1 Issue, 2005-2010 187 7.5 UK Party Leader Satisfaction Ratings, 2006-2010 189 7.6 ‘Best Party of Key Issue’: Europe, 2005-2007 190 8.1 UK Public Attitudes towards the EU, 1992-1996 221 8.2 UK Public saying Europe No1 Issue, 2010-2016 222 8.3 UK Public saying Immigration No1 Issue, 2010-2016 223 8.4 UK Voting Intention, 2010-2016 225 x Summary This thesis provides an in-depth analysis and explanation of policy change in the Conservative Party on the question of European integration, from May 1997 to February 2016. Firstly, it puts into context what is meant when we say that a political party has changed, before proceeding to examine the exogenous and endogenous factors that can influence a political party to change policy positions. Following from this, it considers how insights from new institutionalist theory can provide a more comprehensive explanation of how an institution like a political party changes policy over time. It achieves this by introducing further theoretical tools and mechanisms, such as path dependency and historical legacy, that helps provide a more detailed analysis of the processes behind policy change. It then traces Conservative European policy from May 1997 to February 2016, identifying the changes and continuities in chronological order. It categorises each period according to Lynch and Whitaker’s typology of different varieties of Euroscepticism and identifies the type of change observed. The following chapters are then structured thematically, using the exogenous and endogenous factors of policy change and the new institutionalist theory approach, to analyse the causes of policy change from 1997-2001, 2001-2005, 2005-2010, and 2010-2016. The main findings of the thesis are summarised as follows: • Incrementally over the period European policy moves in a more Eurosceptic direction.
Recommended publications
  • Public Bills Before Parliament This Session
    Legislation – General Notes In the list of Bills which follows, the type of Bill is shown at the left-hand margin next to the title by the following codes: G Government Bills C Consolidation Bills B Private Members' Bills (Presentation bill under SO No 57 prioritised by the ballot procedure SO No 14 (6)). The number after refers to position in ballot P Private Members' Bills (Presentation bill under SO No 57) T Private Members' Bills (Presentation bill under the Ten Minute Rule, SO No 23) L Private Members' Bills starting in the House of Lords (Presentation bill under HL SO No 41 (3)) [HL] Bill starting in the House of Lords HYBRID Public Bill which affects private interests of particular persons or corporate bodies as distinct from the private interests of all persons or bodies Abbreviations: 1R First reading: date of presentation (formal, no debate) 2R Second reading (debate on the principle(s) of the Bill) MR Money resolution (normally taken after 2R only shown in the list if taken at another time) WM Ways and Means resolution GM Guillotine Motion SRC Second Reading Committee (2R taken in Committee: formal 2R in whole House next day unless otherwise stated) SGC/WGC Scottish or Welsh Grand Committee consideration of principles (equates with SRC) PBC Public Bill Committee in the House of Commons Comm Committee of the Whole House Comm** House of Lords Grand Committee, taken in a committee room JCCB Joint Committee on Consolidation Bills JC TLRB Joint Committee on Tax Law Re-write Bills (the date indicates the date on which the Bill was committed to the Joint Committee).
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of 2008122008-Cwells-Regulated
    1 donation information continues on reverse Late reported donation by regulated donees 15 February 2001 - 31 January 2008 (where data is available) Regulated donee Donor organisation Donor forename Donor surname Donor status Address 1 Address 2 Jimmy Hood MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Keith Simpson MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Cheryl Gillan MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Elfyn Llwyd MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Stewart MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Stewart MP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall John Gummer MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Christopher Beazles BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Chris Smith MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Mike Weir MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Tony Worthington MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Davidson MP BAA plc Company 130 Wilton Road Paul Tyler BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Matthew Taylor MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Menzies Campbell MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Archy Kirkwood BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road David Hanson MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Colin Breed MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road David Marshall MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Mark Oaten MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Diana Wallis MEP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall Christopher Ruane MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Tim Loughton MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Robert Wareing MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Robert Wareing MP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall John McFall MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road
    [Show full text]
  • Theos Turbulentpriests Reform:Layout 1
    Turbulent Priests? The Archbishop of Canterbury in contemporary English politics Daniel Gover Theos Friends’ Programme Theos is a public theology think tank which seeks to influence public opinion about the role of faith and belief in society. We were launched in November 2006 with the support of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, and the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor. We provide • high-quality research, reports and publications; • an events programme; • news, information and analysis to media companies and other opinion formers. We can only do this with your help! Theos Friends receive complimentary copies of all Theos publications, invitations to selected events and monthly email bulletins. If you would like to become a Friend, please detach or photocopy the form below, and send it with a cheque to Theos for £60. Thank you. Yes, I would like to help change public opinion! I enclose a cheque for £60 made payable to Theos. Name Address Postcode Email Tel Data Protection Theos will use your personal data to inform you of its activities. If you prefer not to receive this information please tick here By completing you are consenting to receiving communications by telephone and email. Theos will not pass on your details to any third party. Please return this form to: Theos | 77 Great Peter Street | London | SW1P 2EZ S: 97711: D: 36701: Turbulent Priests? what Theos is Theos is a public theology think tank which exists to undertake research and provide commentary on social and political arrangements. We aim to impact opinion around issues of faith and belief in The Archbishop of Canterbury society.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party Strategy, 1997-2001: Nation and National Identity
    Conservative Party Strategy, 1997-2001: Nation and National Identity A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy , Claire Elizabeth Harris Department of Politics, University of Sheffield September 2005 Acknowledgements There are so many people I'd like to thank for helping me through the roller-coaster experience of academic research and thesis submission. Firstly, without funding from the ESRC, this research would not have taken place. I'd like to say thank you to them for placing their faith in my research proposal. I owe a huge debt of gratitude to Andrew Taylor. Without his good humour, sound advice and constant support and encouragement I would not have reached the point of completion. Having a supervisor who is always ready and willing to offer advice or just chat about the progression of the thesis is such a source of support. Thank you too, to Andrew Gamble, whose comments on the final draft proved invaluable. I'd also like to thank Pat Seyd, whose supervision in the first half of the research process ensured I continued to the second half, his advice, experience and support guided me through the challenges of research. I'd like to say thank you to all three of the above who made the change of supervisors as smooth as it could have been. I cannot easily put into words the huge effect Sarah Cooke had on my experience of academic research. From the beginnings of ESRC application to the final frantic submission process, Sarah was always there for me to pester for help and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Disposal Services Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2006-2007
    Annual Report & Accounts 2006-2007 DisposalSMART 1 What is the Disposal Services Agency? The Disposal Services Agency (DSA) is the sole authority for the disposal process of all surplus defence equipment, with the exception of nuclear, land and buildings. The Agency targets potential markets particularly in developing countries in a pro-active manner; to enable them to procure formally used British defence equipment instead of equipment from other countries. The principal activity of the Agency is the provision of disposal and sales services to MoD and other parts of the public sector. These services include Government-to-Government Sales, Asset Realisation, Inventory Disposals, Site Clearances, Repayment Sales, Waste Management and Consultancy and Valuation Services. DSA’s Aim: To secure the best nancial return from the sale of surplus equipment and stores; to minimise the cost of sales and to operate as an intelligent contracting organisation with various agreements with British Industry and Commerce. DSA’s Mission: To provide Defence and other users with an agreed, effective and ef cient disposals and sales service in order to support UK Defence capability. DSA’s Vision: To be the best government Disposals organisation in the world. DisposalSMART Annual Report & Accounts 2006-2007 A Defence Agency of the Ministry of Defence Annual Report and Accounts 2006-2007 Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 7 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 23rd July 2007 HC 705
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2015 Results
    General Election 2015 Results. The UK General Election was fought across all 46 Parliamentary Constituencies in the East Midlands on 7 May 2015. Previously the Conservatives held 30 of these seats, and Labour 16. Following the change of seats in Corby and Derby North the Conservatives now hold 32 seats and Labour 14. The full list of the regional Prospective Parliamentary Candidates (PPCs) is shown below with the elected MP is shown in italics; Amber Valley - Conservative Hold: Stuart Bent (UKIP); John Devine (G); Kevin Gillott (L); Nigel Mills (C); Kate Smith (LD) Ashfield - Labour Hold: Simon Ashcroft (UKIP); Mike Buchanan (JMB); Gloria De Piero (L); Helen Harrison (C); Philip Smith (LD) Bassetlaw - Labour Hold: Sarah Downs (C); Leon Duveen (LD); John Mann (L); David Scott (UKIP); Kris Wragg (G) Bolsover - Labour Hold: Peter Bedford (C); Ray Calladine (UKIP); David Lomax (LD); Dennis Skinner (L) Boston & Skegness - Conservative Hold: Robin Hunter-Clarke (UKIP); Peter Johnson (I); Paul Kenny (L); Lyn Luxton (TPP); Chris Pain (AIP); Victoria Percival (G); Matt Warman (C); David Watts (LD); Robert West (BNP). Sitting MP Mark Simmonds did not standing for re-election Bosworth - Conservative Hold: Chris Kealey (L); Michael Mullaney (LD); David Sprason (UKIP); David Tredinnick (C) Broxtowe - Conservative Hold: Ray Barry (JMB); Frank Dunne (UKIP); Stan Heptinstall (LD); David Kirwan (G); Nick Palmer (L); Anna Soubry (C) Charnwood - Conservative Hold: Edward Argar (C); Cathy Duffy (BNP); Sean Kelly-Walsh (L); Simon Sansome (LD); Lynton Yates (UKIP). Sitting MP Stephen Dorrell did not standing for re- election Chesterfield - Labour Hold: Julia Cambridge (LD); Matt Genn (G); Tommy Holgate (PP); Toby Perkins (L); Mark Vivis (C); Matt Whale (TUSC); Stuart Yeowart (UKIP).
    [Show full text]
  • Parliaments and Legislatures Series Samuel C. Patterson
    PARLIAMENTS AND LEGISLATURES SERIES SAMUEL C. PATTERSON GENERAL ADVISORY EDITOR Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government EDITED BY SHAUN BOWLER, DAVID M. FARRELL, AND RICHARD S. KATZ OHI O STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS COLUMBUS Copyright © 1999 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Party discipline and parliamentary government / edited by Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz. p. cm. — (Parliaments and legislatures series) Based on papers presented at a workshop which was part of the European Consortium for Political Research's joint sessions in France in 1995. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8142-0796-0 (cl: alk. paper). — ISBN 0-8142-5000-9 (pa : alk. paper) 1. Party discipline—Europe, Western. 2. Political parties—Europe, Western. 3. Legislative bodies—Europe, Western. I. Bowler, Shaun, 1958- . II. Farrell, David M., 1960- . III. Katz, Richard S. IV. European Consortium for Political Research. V. Series. JN94.A979P376 1998 328.3/75/ 094—dc21 98-11722 CIP Text design by Nighthawk Design. Type set in Times New Roman by Graphic Composition, Inc. Printed by Bookcrafters, Inc.. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. 98765432 1 Contents Foreword vii Preface ix Part I: Theories and Definitions 1 Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments 3 Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz 2 How Political Parties Emerged from the Primeval Slime: Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and the Formation of Governments 23 Michael Laver and Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Northamptonshire Conservatives Welcome Wind Farm Planning Announcement
    NORTHAMPTONSHIRE CONSERVATIVES WELCOME WIND FARM PLANNING ANNOUNCEMENT Conservative Members of Parliament in Northamptonshire and the Party’s Parliamentary Candidate for Corby & East Northamptonshire, Thomas Pursglove, have today welcomed the changes to planning law which will ensure local residents affected by wind farm proposals will actually have a proper say in whether wind turbines are sited in or near their communities. New planning guidance supporting the planning framework from DCLG will make clear that the need for renewable energy does not automatically override environmental protections and the planning concerns of local communities. It will also give greater weight to landscape and visual impact concerns. In welcoming the announcement Chris Heaton-Harris MP (Daventry), said: “If you have been involved in any local campaign to fight an inappropriately sited onshore wind farm, you will know that on every occasion local opinion is trumped at the planning appeal by national energy policy/targets. The changes announced mean that this is reversed and more weight has to be given to local opinion. From what I can gather, subsidies will also be reviewed on an annual basis. This is superb news for those fighting unwanted wind turbines across Daventry and across the whole of England. I truly believe that this announcement brings about the beginning of the end of new onshore wind turbines across England. It is extraordinarily excellent news!” Peter Bone MP (Wellingborough), said: “Conservative ministers are to be congratulated for pushing through a reform to planning regulations which will mean that when local councils turn down wind farm proposals, they will not be overturned on appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • None of the Above: the UK House of Commons Votes on Reforming the House of Lords, February 2003
    d:/1polq/74-3/mclean.3d ^ 24/6/3 ^ 16:6 ^ bp/sh None of the Above: The UK House of Commons Votes on Reforming the House of Lords, February 2003 IAIN MCLEAN, ARTHUR SPIRLING AND MEG RUSSELL The preamble to the UK's Parliament Act cent) of the members of a future house be 1911 (1 & 2 Geo. 5 c.13) states that that Act elected, but rejected the Royal Com- is a temporary measure only: mission's proposal that all appointed members be chosen by an independent Whereas it is intended to substitute for the House of Lords as it at present exists a Second appointments commission. Chamber constituted on a popular instead of This White Paper had a poor reception. hereditary basis, but substitution cannot be The Lord Chancellor's Department, immediately brought into operation . which issued it, later analysed the re- sponses to it. Of the 82 per cent of Attempts to bring the substitution into respondents who discussed election, operation in 1949 and 1968 failed. The 89 per cent `called for a house that was Labour Party's 1997 manifesto states: 50per cent or more elected'. Of the 17 per The House of Lords must be reformed. As an cent of respondents who discussed the initial, self-contained reform, not dependent future of the Church of England bishops, on further reform in the future, the right of 85 per cent opposed their continued pre- hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House sence in the house. Of the 12 per cent of of Lords will be ended by statute.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One: Postwar Resentment and the Invention of Middle America 10
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Jeffrey Christopher Bickerstaff Doctor of Philosophy ________________________________________ Timothy Melley, Director ________________________________________ C. Barry Chabot, Reader ________________________________________ Whitney Womack Smith, Reader ________________________________________ Marguerite S. Shaffer, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT TALES FROM THE SILENT MAJORITY: CONSERVATIVE POPULISM AND THE INVENTION OF MIDDLE AMERICA by Jeffrey Christopher Bickerstaff In this dissertation I show how the conservative movement lured the white working class out of the Democratic New Deal Coalition and into the Republican Majority. I argue that this political transformation was accomplished in part by what I call the "invention" of Middle America. Using such cultural representations as mainstream print media, literature, and film, conservatives successfully exploited what came to be known as the Social Issue and constructed "Liberalism" as effeminate, impractical, and elitist. Chapter One charts the rise of conservative populism and Middle America against the backdrop of 1960s social upheaval. I stress the importance of backlash and resentment to Richard Nixon's ascendancy to the Presidency, describe strategies employed by the conservative movement to win majority status for the GOP, and explore the conflict between this goal and the will to ideological purity. In Chapter Two I read Rabbit Redux as John Updike's attempt to model the racial education of a conservative Middle American, Harry "Rabbit" Angstrom, in "teach-in" scenes that reflect the conflict between the social conservative and Eastern Liberal within the author's psyche. I conclude that this conflict undermines the project and, despite laudable intentions, Updike perpetuates caricatures of the Left and hastens Middle America's rejection of Liberalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Carina Trimingham -V
    Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 1296 (QB) Case No: HQ10D03060 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 24/05/2012 Before: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: Carina Trimingham Claimant - and - Associated Newspapers Limited Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Matthew Ryder QC & William Bennett (instructed by Mishcon de Reya) for the Claimant Antony White QC & Alexandra Marzec (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 23,24,25,26,27 April 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ............................. THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT Trimingham v. ANL Approved Judgment Mr Justice Tugendhat : 1. By claim form issued on 11 August 2010 the Claimant (“Ms Trimingham”) complained that the Defendant had wrongfully published private information concerning herself in eight articles. 2. Mr Christopher Huhne MP had been re-elected as the Member of Parliament for Eastleigh in Hampshire at the General Election held in May 2010, just over a month before the first of the articles complained of. He became Secretary of State for Energy in the Coalition Government. He was one of the leading figures in the Government and in the Liberal Democrat Party. In 2008 Ms Trimingham and Mr Huhne started an affair, unknown to both Mr Huhne’s wife, Ms Pryce, and Ms Trimingham’s civil partner. By 2008 Mr Huhne had become the Home Affairs spokesman for the Liberal Democrats.
    [Show full text]