Vigicarib News
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Resource #350932
−This Clinical Resource gives subscribers additional insight related to the Recommendations published in− September 2019 ~ Resource #350932 Anticipated Availability of First-Time Generics ―To help explain the benefits of generic drugs to your patients, the FDA has patient education materials available at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/generic-drugs/patient-education ― Branda Generic Name Generic Manufacturer(s)b,1 Anticipated Availabilityc (Manufacturer) Acanya Benzoyl peroxide 2.5%/ Teva Generic now available (Valeant) Clindamycin phosphate 1.2% Cuprimine Penicillamine capsule Amerigen, Teva Generic now available (Bausch Health) Delzicol Mesalamine delayed-release Teva Generic now available (Warner Chilcott) capsule Diclegis Doxylamine/Pyridoxine Teva Generic now available (Duchesnay) Exjade Deferasirox tablets for oral Teva Generic now available (Novartis) suspension Fareston Toremifene Rising (EirGen Pharma Limited) Generic now available (Kyowa Kirin) Faslodex Fulvestrant Sandoz Generic now available (AstraZeneca) Firazyr Icatibant Teva Generic now available (Shire Orphan Therapies) Gablofen Baclofen 1 mg/mL single dose Mylan Institutional Generic now available (Piramal) vial Hemabate Carboprost tromethamine Dr. Reddy’s Generic now available (Pharmacia & Upjohn) Letairis Ambrisentan Cipla, Mylan, Par, Sigmapharm, Sun, Teva, Generic now available (Gilead) Zydus Lexiva Fosamprenavir Mylan Generic now available (Viv) More. Copyright © 2019 by Therapeutic Research Center 3120 W. March Lane, Stockton, CA 95219 ~ Phone: 209-472-2240 ~ Fax: 209-472-2249 pharmacist.therapeuticresearch.com ~ prescriber.therapeuticresearch.com ~ pharmacytech.therapeuticresearch.com ~ nursesletter.therapeuticresearch.com (Clinical Resource #350932: Page 2 of 24) Branda Generic Name Generic Manufacturer(s)b,1 Anticipated Availabilityc (Manufacturer) Lotemax Loteprednol ophthalmic Hi-tech Generic now available (Bausch & Lomb) suspension Lyrica Pregabalin capsule Alembic, Amneal, Ascend (Alkem), Cipla Generic now available (PF Prism CV) (InvaGen), Dr. -
Gilead Sciences, Inc. November 13, 2016
Student Investment Management Gilead Sciences, Inc. November 13, 2016 Gilead Sciences, Inc. NASDAQ: GILD BUY $92.00 The Fisher College of Business Student Investment Management Program is initiating coverage on Gilead Sciences with a BUY rating. Our target price is $92.00. Our implied P/E for 2016E is 7.9x versus consensus 6.5x. Our 2017 and 2018 estimates are 8.8x and 9.5x, respectively. Company overview Gilead Sciences, Inc. is a research-based biopharmaceutical Fund Manager company that discovers, develops and commercializes innovative Royce West, CFA medicines in areas of unmet medical need. Gilead strives to 614-227-2948 transform and simplify care for people with life-threatening illnesses [email protected] around the world. Gilead's portfolio of products and pipeline of investigational drugs includes treatments for HIV/AIDS, liver Analyst diseases, cancer, inflammatory and respiratory diseases, and Andrew Jasen cardiovascular conditions. 301-300-0702 [email protected] 12-Month trading performance 10.0% S&P Current share price: $72.64 7.0% 52 wk range: $71.76 - $108.13 0.0% S5HLTH Market cap: $99.9bn 1.4% P/E: 6.8x (10.0%) XBI (3.0%) Diluted shares out.: 1.3bn Last dividend (9/4/2016): $0.47 (20.0%) GILD Dividend yield: 2.4% (25.5%) Beta: 0.94 (30.0%) EV/EBITDA: 4.8x EV/Sales: 3.1x (40.0%) Nov-15 Jan-16 Mar-16 May-16 Jul-16 Sep-16 Nov-16 Investment thesis We are placing a BUY rating on GILD with a price target of $92.00, a 20.4% upside to the current trading price. -
Amgen-Opinion-Jan-7-2021.Pdf
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELA WARE AMGEN INC. and AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-0561-CFC HOSPIRA, INC. and PFIZER INC. Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER Having considered the merits of Defendants Hospira, Inc. and Pfizer Inc.' s Motion to Stay (D.I. 19) and the briefs filed by the parties in connection with that motion, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to stay is GRANTED IN PART for the following reasons: 1. Plaintiffs Amgen Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing, Limited make and sell the biologic filgrastim under the brand name Neupogen®. Filgrastim, like many biologics, is a protein. Plaintiffs own two patents generally related to methods of purifying such proteins. These two patents are U.S. Patent Nos. 10,577,392 (the #392 patent), and 9,643,997 (the #997 patent). The #392 patent issued in March of 2020. 2. Defendants manufacture and sell a biosimilar version Neupogen® called Nivestym®. Nivestym® has been available since 2018 and is the third biosimilar version ofNeupogen® launched in the United States since Neupogen® became available almost thirty years ago. 3. Both the #392 patent and #997 patent have been asserted against the Defendants-albeit in different actions-for the manufacture ofNivestym®. The #392 patent has been asserted in this case (C.A. 20-0561 ), which was filed on April 24, 2020. The #997 patent has been asserted in the related case Amgen Inc. et al. v. Hospira, Inc. et al., No. 18-cv-1064-CFC-CJB (D. Del. 2018). That case is scheduled for a jury trial to begin on May 17, 2021. -
In the Supreme Court of the United States ACORDA THERAPEUTICS, INC., Petitioner
NO. 181280 In the Supreme Court of the United States ACORDA THERAPEUTICS, INC., Petitioner, v. ROXANE LABORATORIES, INC., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE BOSTON PATENT LAW ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY SOPHIE F. WANG COUNSEL OF RECORD BRYANA T. MCGILLYCUDDY NATALIA SMYCHKOVICH CHOATE HALL & STEWART LLP TWO INTERNATIONAL PLACE BOSTON, MA 02110 (617) 248-5000 [email protected] MAY 8, 2019 COUNSEL FOR AMICUS CURIAE SUPREME COURT PRESS ʕ (888) 958-5705 ʕ BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... ii INTEREST OF THE AMICUS CURIAE ................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................... 1 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 3 I. THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT’S DECISION CREATES SIGNIFICANT UNCERTAINTY CONCERNING THE SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY OF THE BLOCKING PATENT DOCTRINE. ............................................ 3 A. Clarification Is Needed as to the Definition of a “Blocking Patent.” .............. 3 B. Clarification Is Also Needed as to Whether and How the Blocking Patent Doctrine Should Be Applied to Objective Indicia of NonObviousness. ...................... 8 II. ABSENT CLARIFICATION, THE EXPANDED BLOCKING PATENT DOCTRINE HAS A CHILLING EFFECT ON INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT. .................. 11 A. Improvement Innovations Are Critical and Require Significant Investment. ....... 11 B. Objective Indicia Matter. .......................... 13 CONCLUSION .......................................................... 16 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Roxane Labs., Inc., 903 F.3d 1310 (Fed. Cir. 2018) ......... passim Apple v. ITC, 725 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2013) ......................... 14 Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc., 496 U.S. 661 (1990) ............................................. 6 Galderma Labs., L.P. -
National Emergency Management Organisation (Nemo) Ministry of National Security St
NATIONAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION (NEMO) MINISTRY OF NATIONAL SECURITY ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES WEST INDIES Tel: 784-456-2975, Fax: 784-457-1691, Email: [email protected] or [email protected] ______________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HEALTH SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE PROTOCOL FOR THE ENTRY OF FULLY VACCINATED TRAVELLERS TO ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES – revised 10/08/2021 AIM: The safe entry of travellers to St. Vincent and the Grenadines in a manner that reduces the risk of the importation and subsequent transmission of COVID-19 in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. OBJECTIVES: 1. To establish the risk of the arriving traveller introducing new COVID-19 cases to SVG; 2. To minimize exposure of residents of SVG to new COVID-19 cases; 3. Early identification of potential exposure to COVID-19 and 4. Early containment of new COVID-19 cases. ESTABLISH RISK OF ARRIVING TRAVELLER: The arriving traveller will: 1. Complete the Pre-Arrival Form available at health.gov.vc And the Port Health Officer will: 1. Review Port Health form for each arriving passenger. 1 PHASED PROCESS OF ENTRY OF FULLY VACCINATED TRAVELERS TO ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES: TESTING & QUARANTINE: PHASE #16 - Commencing Wednesday, August 11, 2021: 1. Where ‘Fully Vaccinated Travelers’ are those persons who: a. Have completed a vaccination regimen with one of the following COVID-19 vaccines recognized by the Ministry of Health, Wellness and the Environment of St Vincent and the Grenadines: i. AstraZeneca – Oxford AstraZeneca (Vaxzevria), COVISHIELD, AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine by SK Bioscience; ii. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine; iii. Moderna COVID-19 vaccine; iv. -
Periodic Update on AEFI
CONSOLIDATED REGIONAL AND GLOBAL INFORMATION ON ADVERSE EVENTS FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION (AEFI) AGAINST COVID-19 AND OTHER UPDATES WASHINGTON, DC Updated: 31 March 2021 1 OFFICIAL REPORTS ON PHARMACOVIGILANCE PROGRAMS CANADA § As of 19 March 2021, 3,729,312 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Covishield vaccines had been administered. § A total of 2,530 individual reports of one or more adverse events (0.068% of doses administered) were reported. Of these, 320 were considered serious events (0.009% of doses administered), with anaphylaxis being the most frequently reported. § There were a total of 7,397 adverse events following immunization (AEFI) (consisting of 2,530 reports of one or more events), mostly non-serious adverse events, such as injection-site reactions, partesia, itching, hives, headache, hyposthesia, and nausea. Only 0.8% of cases corresponded to anaphylaxis (59 cases, or 15.8 cases per million doses administered). § Most adverse events reported were among women, and in people between the ages of 18 and 49, these being the groups prioritized for vaccination § A total of 24 reported adverse events were identified as post-vaccination deaths. After medical review, it was determined that 13 of these deaths were not linked to administration of the COVID-19 vaccine, while the other 11 are still under investigation. Link: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/ UNITED STATES § Nearly 126 million doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines were administered between 14 December 2020 and 29 March 2021. § The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) received 2,509 reports of deaths (0.0019% of doses administered) that have not been linked to the vaccine. -
Summit of G20 Argentina
Boletín informativo del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Comercio Internacional y Culto de la República Argentina 1 July 20, 2021 SUMMIT OF G20 Solá: “We have the opportunity to create a better economy with less inequality” ARGENTINA - UNITED STATES Bilateral Meeting of Foreign Minister Solá and Secretary of State Antony Blinken Solá at G20 Summit: “We have the opportunity to create a better economy with less inequality” 2 “Today, more than ever, we must strengthen organizations at Palazzo Lanfranchi, the Minister international cooperation and solidarity to achieve highlighted the importance of “preparedness for inclusive and sustainable post-COVID-19 recovery,” and response to health emergencies, based on Foreign Minister Felipe Solá stated during the G20 international solidarity and cooperation” in order to Foreign Affairs and Development Ministerial “prevent future epidemics from becoming new Meeting, held on 29 June in Matera, Italy, one of the global catastrophes.” objectives of which was to discuss ways to strengthen “multilateralism and global governance” “We need a common global growth plan that allows in view of the urgent problems facing the for coordinated fiscal and monetary interventions in international community. order to avoid unequal and unbalanced recovery and that guarantees a more equal future,” Solá Solá referred to the serious social and economic stated during his first address, adding that “we have effects of the pandemic, and advocated “redoubling the opportunity to create a better economy that efforts to guarantee global mass vaccination and produces less carbon, creates less inequality, and promote voluntary licensing agreements that provides digital access and access to new enable the necessary transfer of knowledge and technologies for all. -
Views Expressed in This Publication by Any Contributor Are Not Necessarily Those of the Publisher
THOMSON REUTERS Expansion of the blocking-patent doctrine By Ha Kung Wong, Esq., and Michael Scerbo, Esq., Venable LLP APRIL 13, 2020 In 2005 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit first Therefore, the law considers two factors to be probative of articulated the blocking-patent doctrine in Merck & Co. v. Teva whether or not an invention would have been obvious: evidence Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., 395 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2005), or of (1) commercial success, and (2) a causal nexus between the Merck I. invention and commercial success of a product embodying it.4 The Federal Circuit said that under the doctrine courts may reduce The Federal Circuit in Merck I explained that the district court’s the weight given to evidence of commercial success where an finding of commercial success should be given only minimal earlier patent blocked market entry by others. weight because Merck had both (1) a preexisting patent covering the administration of alendronate sodium (a bisphosphonate) to The appellate court later explained in Acorda Therapeutics treat osteoporosis, and (2) exclusive marketing rights granted by Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories Inc., 903 F.3d 1310 (Fed. Cir. 2018), the Food and Drug Administration. that a patent is a blocking patent “where the practice of a later invention would infringe the earlier patent.” ”Because market entry by others was precluded on those bases, the inference of nonobviousness … from evidence of commercial The rationale behind the doctrine was that where others are legally success … is weak.”5 barred from commercializing a purportedly obvious idea due to a preexisting patent, the court may conclude that the inference of In the years after the Federal Circuit’s decision in Merck I, the court nonobviousness from evidence of commercial success is weak. -
In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware
Case 1:20-cv-00561-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AMGEN INC. and AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, C.A. No. ________ Plaintiffs, v. HOSPIRA, INC. and PFIZER INC., DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Amgen Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, for their Complaint against Defendants Hospira, Inc. and Pfizer Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby allege as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Amgen Inc. is a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, California, 91320. Amgen Inc. discovers, develops, manufactures, and sells innovative therapeutic products based on advances in molecular biology, recombinant DNA technology, and chemistry. Founded in 1980, Amgen Inc. is a pioneer in the development of biological human therapeutics. Today, Amgen Inc. is one of the largest biotechnology companies in the world, fueled in part by the success of NEUPOGEN® (filgrastim). 2. Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (“AML”) is a corporation existing under the laws of Bermuda with its principal place of business in Juncos, Puerto Rico. AML manufactures and sells biologic medicines for treating particular diseases in humans. AML is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc. Case 1:20-cv-00561-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 27 PageID #: 2 3. On information and belief, Hospira, Inc. (“Hospira”) is a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at 275 North Field Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045. -
ANALYSIS of AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDERS to AID PUBLIC COMMENT in the Matter of Pfizer Inc
ANALYSIS OF AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDERS TO AID PUBLIC COMMENT In the Matter of Pfizer Inc. and Hospira, Inc. File No. 151-0074 The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) has accepted, subject to final approval, an Agreement Containing Consent Orders (“Consent Agreement”) from Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”) and Hospira, Inc. (“Hospira”) that is designed to remedy the anticompetitive effects resulting from Pfizer’s acquisition of Hospira. Under the terms of the proposed Consent Agreement, the parties are required to divest all of Pfizer’s rights and assets related to generic acetylcysteine inhalation solution and all Hospira’s rights and assets related to clindamycin phosphate injection, voriconazole injection, and melphalan hydrochloride injection to Alvogen Group, Inc. (“Alvogen”). The proposed Consent Agreement has been placed on the public record for thirty days for receipt of comments from interested persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. After thirty days, the Commission will again evaluate the proposed Consent Agreement, along with the comments received, to make a final decision as to whether it should withdraw from the proposed Consent Agreement or make final the Decision and Order (“Order”). Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger executed on February 5, 2015, Pfizer proposes to acquire Hospira for approximately $16 billion (the “Proposed Acquisition”). The Commission alleges in its Complaint that the Proposed Acquisition, if consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, by lessening current competition in the markets for generic acetylcysteine inhalation solution and clindamycin phosphate injection and future competition in the markets for voriconazole injection and melphalan hydrochloride injection in the United States. -
Annual Report
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 MARCH 2020 To Our Shareholders Alex Gorsky Chairman and Chief Executive Officer By just about every measure, Johnson & These are some of the many financial and Johnson’s 133rd year was extraordinary. strategic achievements that were made possible by the commitment of our more than • We delivered strong operational revenue and 132,000 Johnson & Johnson colleagues, who adjusted operational earnings growth* that passionately lead the way in improving the health exceeded the financial performance goals we and well-being of people around the world. set for the Company at the start of 2019. • We again made record investments in research and development (R&D)—more than $11 billion across our Pharmaceutical, Medical Devices Propelled by our people, products, and and Consumer businesses—as we maintained a purpose, we look forward to the future relentless pursuit of innovation to develop vital with great confidence and optimism scientific breakthroughs. as we remain committed to leading • We proudly launched new transformational across the spectrum of healthcare. medicines for untreated and treatment-resistant diseases, while gaining approvals for new uses of many of our medicines already in the market. Through proactive leadership across our enterprise, we navigated a constant surge • We deployed approximately $7 billion, of unique and complex challenges, spanning primarily in transactions that fortify our dynamic global issues, shifting political commitment to digital surgery for a more climates, industry and competitive headwinds, personalized and elevated standard of and an ongoing litigious environment. healthcare, and that enhance our position in consumer skin health. As we have experienced for 133 years, we • And our teams around the world continued can be sure that 2020 will present a new set of working to address pressing public health opportunities and challenges. -
Abdala COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate Begins Phase II of Trials
Abdala COVID-19 vaccine candidate begins phase II of trials Doctor in Sciences Marta Ayala Avila, director of the Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB) Havana, February 2 (RHC)-- Phase II of the clinical trial of the Abdala vaccine candidate (CIGB 66) against COVID-19 has begun at the Saturnino Lora Hospital in the eastern city of Santiago de Cuba. This phase will be performed with 760 volunteers. Doctor in Sciences Marta Ayala Avila, member of the Political Bureau and general director of the Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB), informed that while in phase I participants were aged between 19 and 54 years,in the new stage, the range is extended up to 80. "Only the intramuscular mode of administration is explored, with the study of two dose levels of 25 and 50 micrograms, with three administrations of the corresponding doses and different time intervals in between. Also, a placebo group was included," specified Ayala Avila. The Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology is working simultaneously with the candidate Mambisa (CIGB 669). Both potential COVID-19 vaccines began their trials on December 7 last year and 56 days after administration have proven safe, with minimal adverse effects, such as mild pain in the vaccination area. Abdala and Mambisa, together with the Soberana series of the Finlay Vaccine Institute, show Cuba's scientific strength and the hope that the island's population can be immunized against the deadly SARS- COV-2. https://www.radiohc.cu/en/noticias/nacionales/246457-abdala-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-begins-phase-ii- of-trials Radio Habana Cuba.