DOCSLIB.ORG

Neoproterozoic Uinta Mountain Group of Northeastern Utah: Pre-Sturtian Geographic, Tectonic, and Biologic Evolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neoproterozoic Uinta Mountain Group of Northeastern Utah: Pre-Sturtian Geographic, Tectonic, and Biologic Evolution fl d006-01 page 1 of 26 Geological Society of America Field Guide 6 2005 Neoproterozoic Uinta Mountain Group of northeastern Utah: Pre-Sturtian geographic, tectonic, and biologic evolution Carol M. Dehler Department of Geology, Utah State University, 4505 Old Main Hill, Logan, Utah 84322, USA Douglas A. Sprinkel Utah Geological Survey, P.O. Box 14610, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114, USA Susannah M. Porter Department of Earth Science University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA ABSTRACT The Neoproterozoic Uinta Mountain Group is undergoing a new phase of strati- graphic and paleontologic research toward understanding the paleoenvironments, paleoecology, correlation across the range and the region, paleogeography, basin type, and tectonic setting. Mapping, measured sections, sedimentology, paleontology, U-Pb geochronology, and C-isotope geochemistry have resulted in the further characteriza- tion and genetic understanding of the western and eastern Uinta Mountain Group. The Red Pine Shale in the western Uinta Mountain Group and the undivided clastic strata in the eastern Uinta Mountain Group have been a focus of this research, as they are relatively unstudied. Reevaluation of the other units is also underway. The Red Pine Shale is a thick, organic-rich, fossiliferous unit that represents a restricted environment in a marine deltaic setting. The units below the Red Pine Shale are dom- inantly sandstone and orthoquartzite, and represent a fl uviomarine setting. In the eastern Uinta Mountain Group, the undivided clastic strata are subdivided into three informal units due to a mappable 50–70-m-thick shale interval. These strata repre- sent a braided fl uvial system with fl ow to the southwest interrupted by a transgressing shoreline. Correlation between the eastern and western Uinta Mountain Group strata is not complete, yet distinctive shale units in the west and east may be correlative, and one of the latter has been dated (≤770 Ma). Regional correlation with the 770–742 Ma Chuar Group suggests the Red Pine Shale may also be ca. 740 Ma, and correlation with the undated Big Cottonwood Formation and the Pahrump Group are also likely based upon C-isotope, fossil, and provenance similarities. This fi eld trip will examine these strata and consider the hypothesis of a ca. 770–740 Ma regional seaway, fed by large braided rivers, fl ooding intracratonic rift basins and recording the fi rst of three phases of rifting prior to the development of the Cordilleran miogeocline. Keywords: Neoproterozoic, Uinta Mountain Group, intracratonic rift, vase-shaped microfossil, Bavlinella faveolata, Leiosphaeridia sp. Dehler, C.M., Sprinkel, D.A., and Porter, S.M., 2005, Neoproterozoic Uinta Mountain Group of northeastern Utah: Pre-Sturtian geographic, tectonic, and biologic evolution, in Pederson, J., and Dehler, C.M., eds., Interior Western United States: Geological Society of America Field Guide 6, p. 1–25, doi: 10.1130/ 2005.fl d006(01). For permission to copy, contact [email protected]. © 2005 Geological Society of America 1 fl d006-01 page 2 of 26 2 Dehler et al. INTRODUCTION tion indices (TAI) indicate 4.5–7 km of strata (Hansen, 1965; Stone, 1993; Sprinkel et al., 2002). This fi eld trip guide is a review and an update of the existing It is uncertain how the eastern and western Uinta Mountain data sets regarding Uinta Mountain Group geology and reports Group strata correlate; however, similar petrographic patterns are the latest ideas about depositional environments, correlation, evident across the range and throughout the group. Geochemical paleogeography, biologic evolution, and tectonic setting in north- and provenance studies show arkosic sandstone and shale in the eastern Utah during Neoproterozoic time. The focus of the fi eld north part of the range were derived from the Wyoming craton to trip will be on the previously understudied units (Red Pine Shale the north, and quartz arenite in the southern part of the range was and undivided eastern clastic strata), as well as a reevaluation of derived, in part, from a Paleoproterozoic source to the east (e.g., previous interpretations about the other better-studied units, and Wallace, 1972; Sanderson, 1978; Sanderson, 1984; Ball and how all of these units relate to one another in time and space. Farmer, 1998; Condie et al., 2001). The Uinta Mountain Group is interesting for many reasons: The age of the Uinta Mountain Group is likely entirely (1) it is one of few exposed strata in the region for understanding Neoproterozoic. It unconformably overlies the metamorphic the early tectonic evolution of the Late Neoproterozoic western quartzitic and schistose units of the Red Creek Quartzite and Laurentian margin; (2) it likely records the inception of climate Owiyukuts Complex (ca. 1.7 to ca. 2.7 Ga; Hansen, 1965; Sears change leading into the low-latitude glaciations of the Sturtian et al., 1982) and is unconformably overlain by lower Paleozoic episode; and (3) it contains a wealth of microfossils throughout strata. A 770 Ma detrital zircon population from the middle east- the succession that can inform us of pre-Sturtian biologic evolu- ern Uinta Mountain Group (Fanning and Dehler, 2005) indicates tion and how it may relate to (1) and (2) above. Lastly, (4) the that the majority of the Uinta Mountain Group is younger than Uinta Mountain Group is a “sleeping giant” in terms of being 770 Ma. The uppermost unit in the Uinta Mountain Group, the explored for its information on Precambrian geology. It has been Red Pine Shale, yielded a microfossil assemblage and C-isotope under the “curse of the Proterozoic sandstones” (Link et al., variability similar to that of the 742 Ma upper Chuar Group in 1993) for too long, and ongoing and future research will hope- Arizona, therefore putting a possible upper age limit on the fully lift the curse. Uinta Mountain Group (Vidal and Ford, 1985; Karlstrom et al., A general overview of the Uinta Mountain Group is pro- 2000; Porter and Knoll, 2000; Dehler, 2001; Dehler et al., 2006). vided fi rst, followed by a two-day road log that takes the reader Paleomagnetic data from the Uinta Mountain Group indicate clockwise around the Uinta Mountains. On Day 1, the western deposition in equatorial latitudes, and the Uinta Mountain Group and central strata of the north fl ank will be visited, and on Day paleopole sits right on the Chuar Group apparent polar wander 2 the easternmost strata and the strata of the south fl ank will be path, also suggesting a similar age (Weil et al., 2005). viewed and discussed. Western Uinta Mountain Group Stratigraphy UINTA MOUNTAIN GROUP STRATIGRAPHY The western Uinta Mountain Group has been subdivided The Neoproterozoic Uinta Mountain Group is a 4–7-km- several different ways (Williams 1953; Wallace and Crittenden, thick siliciclastic succession that is exposed only in the Uinta 1969; Wallace, 1972; Sanderson, 1984). The nomenclature used Mountains and makes up the core of the Uinta Mountain anti- here is mainly after Wallace (1972), in combination with what cline (Fig. 1). The strata exposed in the western Uinta Mountains has been considered mappable on a 1:125,000 scale by Bry- are characteristically different than those in the eastern Uinta ant (1992). These units include the lowermost formation of Mountains, perhaps due to structural subbasins imparting control Moosehorn Lake (including the basal undivided Uinta Mountain on depositional style. Hansen (1965) indentifi ed two structural Group), the formation of Red Castle, the formation of Dead Horse domes within the overall Uinta anticline, one in the western and Pass, the Mount Watson Formation, the formation of Hades Pass, one in the eastern part of the range, and these roughly correspond and the Red Pine Shale (Figs. 2 and 3). Only the Mount Watson to the changes in stratal character. Formation has been formally named following the Stratigraphic In the western Uinta Mountains, the Uinta Mountain Group Code (Sanderson, 1984). The Red Pine Shale was formalized comprises >4 km of sandstone and sedimentary quartzite, with by Williams (1953) prior to adoption of the Stratigraphic Code lesser shale and rare conglomerate (Wallace, 1972) (Figs. 1 (North American Stratigraphic Commission on Nomenclature, and 2). These strata show much lateral and vertical variability 1983). Other informal units proposed by Wallace (1972) may be and have undergone many subdivisions (see Sanderson, 1984). mappable at larger scales, but will not be featured in this paper. In the eastern part of the range, the Uinta Mountain Group is dominantly sandstone with lesser shale and a distinctive basal Basal Undivided Uinta Mountain Group and Formation of conglomerate and breccia (Jesse Ewing Canyon Formation; Moosehorn Lake Sanderson and Wiley, 1986). The base of the Uinta Mountain The lowermost 60 m of exposed Uinta Mountain Group in Group is exposed only in the eastern Uinta range, and calculated the western range is an undivided interval of white quartz arenite. thicknesses from air photos, seismic profi les, and thermal altera- It is likely a lateral equivalent of the formation of Red Castle, and O O O O O k 110 109 112 111 k k 108 r r r Manila WYOMING O o O 41 B o o 41 F F F SR Great e 43 Flaming Gorge Reservoir Zuj Salt 15 a s s s r r k h y Pz ve XWf t r a Lake c i Xr e k R n 1 B e a Zur 2 re iv l m e 3 C S 4 e B H 5 191 Dutch John W r Sheep Creek 3 B SR R 44 O Zuu Zuu WN A r S e COLOR D iv Zucl Zud S PA R A I N U R 80 80 r N T Cl TAH Salt Lake CityS e Zucu U K eb A M O 4 AO W Zuh U I N T Zur
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wasatch Fault
    The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault UtahUtah Geological Geological Survey Survey PublicPublic Information Information Series Series 40 40 11 9 9 9 9 6 6 The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault CONTENTS The ups and downs of the Wasatch fault . .1 What is the Wasatch fault? . .1 Where is the Wasatch fault? Globally ............................................................................................2 Regionally . .2 Locally .............................................................................................4 Surface expressions (how to recognize the fault) . .5 Land use - your fault? . .8 At a glance - geological relationships . .10 Earthquakes ..........................................................................................12 When/how often? . .14 Howbig? .........................................................................................15 Earthquake hazards . .15 Future probability of the "big one" . .16 Where to get additional information . .17 Selected bibliography . .17 Acknowledgments Text by Sandra N. Eldredge. Design and graphics by Vicky Clarke. Special thanks to: Walter Arabasz of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations for per- mission to reproduce photographs on p. 6, 9, II; Utah State University for permission to use the satellite image mosaic on the cover; Rebecca Hylland for her assistance; Gary Christenson, Kimm Harty, William Lund, Edith (Deedee) O'Brien, and Christine Wilkerson for their reviews; and James Parker for drafting. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Goat Unit Management Plan | Wasatch and Central Mountains
    MOUNTAIN GOAT UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN Wasatch and Central Mountains Lone Peak / Box Elder Peak / Timpanogos / Provo Peak / Nebo August 2019 BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS Lone Peak – Salt Lake County: Boundary begins at the junction of I-15 and I-80 in Salt Lake City; east on I-80 to the Salt Lake-Summit county line; south along this county line to the Salt Lake-Wasatch county line; southwest along this county line to the Salt Lake-Utah county line; southwest along this county line to I-15; north on I-15 to I-80 in Salt Lake City. Box Elder Peak – Utah County: Boundary begins at I-15 and the Salt Lake-Utah county line; east along this county line to the Utah-Wasatch county line; south along this county line to “Pole Line Pass” on the Snake Creek-North Fork American Fork Canyon road; west on this road to SR-92; west on SR-92 to I-15; north on I-15 to the Salt Lake-Utah county line. Timpanogos – Utah County: Boundary begins at the junction of SR-92 and SR-146; southeast on SR-92 to US-189; southwest on US-189 to SR-52; west on SR-52 to US-89; north on US-89 to SR-146; north on SR-146 to SR-92. Provo Peak – Utah County: Boundary begins at the junction of I-15 and US-6 at Spanish Fork; north on I-15 to SR-52; east on SR-52 to US-189; northeast on US-189 to the South Fork Drainage of Provo Canyon; east along this drainage bottom to the Berryport trail; south along this trail to the Left Fork of Hobble Creek road; south on this road to the Right Fork of Hobble Creek road; east on this road to Cedar Canyon; south along this canyon bottom to Wanrhodes Canyon; south along this canyon bottom to Diamond Fork Creek; southwest along this creek to US-6; northeast on US-6 to I-15.
    [Show full text]
  • Wasatch Fault
    WASATCH FAULT NORTHERN POI=ITION Raymond Lundgren WOODWARD· CLYDE ASSOCIATES George E.Hervert & B. A. Vallerga CONSULTING SOIL ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS SAN FRANCISCO - OAKLAND - SAN JOSE OFFICES Wm.T.Black Lloyd S. Cluff Edward Margeson 2730 Adeline Street Keshavan Nair Oakland, Ca 94607 Lewis L.Oriard (415) 444-1256 Mahmut OtU5 C.J.VanTiI P. O. Box 24075 Oaklllnd, ea 94623 July 17, 1970 Project G-12069 Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey 103 Utah Geological Survey Building University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Attention: Dr. William P. Hewitt Director Gentlemen: WASATCH FAULT - NORTHERN PORTION EARTHQUAKE FAULT INVESTIGATION AND EVALUATION The enclosed report and maps presents the results at our investigation and evaluation of the Wasatch fault from near Draper to Brigham City, Utah. The completion of this work marks another important step in Utah's forward-looking approach to minimizing the effects of earthquake and geologic hazards. We are proud to have been associated with the Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey in completing this study, and we appreciate the opportunity of assisting you with such an inter­ esting and challenging problem. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, {4lJ~ Lloyd S. Cluff Vice President and Chief Engineering Geologist LSC: jh Enclosure LOS ANGELES-ORANGE' SAN DIEGO' NEW YORK-CLIFTON' DENVER' KANSAS CITY-ST. LOUIS' PHILADELPHIA-WASHINGTON Affiliated with MATERIALS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, INC. WASATCH FAULT NORTHERN PORTION EARTHBUAKE FAULT INVESTIGATION & EVALUATION av LLOYO S. CLUFF. GEORGE E. BROGAN & CARL E. GLASS PROPERll Of mAR GEOLOGICAL AND. MINfBAlOGICAL SURVEY A GUIDE·TO LAND USE PLANNING FOR UTAH GEOLOGICAL & MINERALOGICAL SURVEY WOODWARD- CLYDE & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS OAKLAND.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Tectonics of Utah with Emphasis on Earthquake-Hazard Characterization
    QUATERNARY TECTONICS OF UTAH WITH EMPHASIS ON EARTHQUAKE-HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION by Suzanne Hecker Utah Geologiral Survey BULLETIN 127 1993 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 0 STATE OF UTAH Michael 0. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison, Director UGSBoard Member Representing Lynnelle G. Eckels ................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ................................................................................................. Civil Engineering Jo Brandt .................................................................................................................. Public-at-Large C. Williatn Berge ...................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Russell C. Babcock, Jr.............................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ............................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ............................................................................................... Economics-Business/Scientific Scott Hirschi, Director, Division of State Lands and Forestry .................................... Ex officio member UGS Editorial Staff J. Stringfellow .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for an Active Shear Zone in Southern Nevada Linking the Wasatch Fault to the Eastern California Shear Zone
    Evidence for an active shear zone in southern Nevada linking the Wasatch fault to the Eastern California shear zone Corné Kreemer, Geoffrey Blewitt, and William C. Hammond Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, and Nevada Seismological Laboratory, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557-0178, USA ABSTRACT In this study, our aim is to elucidate how present-day localized exten- Previous studies have shown that ~5% of the Pacifi c–North sion is transferred southward and westward from the Wasatch Fault zone America relative plate motion is accommodated in the eastern part by (1) analyzing data from continuous GPS stations, and (2) modeling of the Great Basin (western United States). Near the Wasatch fault the present-day strain rate tensor fi eld based on those GPS velocities and zone and other nearby faults, deformation is currently concentrated additional constraints from earthquake focal mechanisms. Considering the within a narrow zone of extension coincident with the eastern margin limited number of high-quality, long-running geodetic monuments, sig- of the northern Basin and Range. Farther south, the pattern of active nifi cant new insight can only be gained through integration of the comple- deformation implied by faulting and seismicity is more enigmatic. To mentary geodetic and moment tensor data sets. Our results provide new assess how present-day strain is accommodated farther south and insight into the question as to whether strain is being accommodated along how this relates to the regional kinematics, we analyze data from narrow zones separating rigid crustal blocks, such as farther to the north, continuous global positioning system (GPS) stations and model the or in a more diffuse manner, as it has over most of the history of the Basin strain rate tensor fi eld using the horizontal GPS velocities and earth- and Range.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAND CANYON GUIDE No. 6
    GRAND CANYON GUIDE no. 6 ... excerpted from Grand Canyon Explorer … Bob Ribokas AN AMATEUR'S REVIEW OF BACKPACKING TOPICS FOR THE T254 - EXPEDITION TO THE GRAND CANYON - MARCH 2007 Descriptions of Grand Canyon Layers Grand Canyon attracts the attention of the world for many reasons, but perhaps its greatest significance lies in the geologic record that is so beautifully preserved and exposed here. The rocks at Grand Canyon are not inherently unique; similar rocks are found throughout the world. What is unique about the geologic record at Grand Canyon is the great variety of rocks present, the clarity with which they're exposed, and the complex geologic story they tell. Paleozoic Strata: Kaibab depositional environment: Kaibab Limestone - This layer forms the surface of the Kaibab and Coconino Plateaus. It is composed primarily of a sandy limestone with a layer of sandstone below it. In some places sandstone and shale also exists as its upper layer. The color ranges from cream to a greyish-white. When viewed from the rim this layer resembles a bathtub ring and is commonly referred to as the Canyon's bathtub ring. Fossils that can be found in this layer are brachiopods, coral, mollusks, sea lilies, worms and fish teeth. Toroweap depositional environment Toroweap Formation - This layer is composed of pretty much the same material as the Kaibab Limestone above. It is darker in color, ranging from yellow to grey, and contains a similar fossil history. Coconino depositional environment: Coconino Sandstone - This layer is composed of pure quartz sand, which are basically petrified sand dunes. Wedge-shaped cross bedding can be seen where traverse-type dunes have been petrified.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Proceedings
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. ALPINE BIRD COMMUNITIES OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESEARcH!/ Clait E. Braun Wildlife Researcher Colorado Division of Wildlife, Research Center, 317 West Prospect Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 ABSTRACT The avifauna of alpine regions of western North America is notably depauperate. Average community size is normally 3 to 4 although 5 species may consistently breed and nest above treeline. Only 1 species is a year around resident and totally dependent upon alpine habitats. Seasonal habitat preferences of the breeding avifauna are identified and the complexity of the processes and factors influencing alpine regions are reviewed. Management problems are discussed and research opportunities are identified. KEYWORDS: alpine ecosystem, habitat, avifauna, management, western North America. INTRODUCTION Alpine ecosystems occur in most of the high mountain cordilleras of western North America. Alpine, as used in this paper, refers to the area above treeline where habitats are characterized by short growing seasons, low temperatures and high winds. The term "tundra" is frequently used to describe these habitats but is more properly used in connection with arctic areas north of the limit of forest growth (Hoffmann and Taber 1967). While use of the terms "alpine tundra" and "arctic tundra" is common in designating above treeline (alpine) and northern lowland areas (arctic), the terminology of Billings (1979) is preferred. Likewise, lumping of alpine and arctic ecosystems into the "tundra biome" (see Kendeigh 1961) is not really feasible because of the extreme differences in radiation, moisture, topography, photo­ period, presence or absence of permafrost, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy
    Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy Chama Crossing at Red Rock, New Mexico U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service - National Trails Intermountain Region Bureau of Land Management - Utah This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents i Table of Contents v Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction 3 The National Trails System 4 Old Spanish National Historic Trail Feasibility Study 4 Legislative History of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Nature and Purpose of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Trail Period of Significance 5 Trail Significance Statement 7 Brief Description of the Trail Routes 9 Goal of the Comprehensive Administrative Strategy 10 Next Steps and Strategy Implementation 11 Chapter 2 - Approaches to Administration 13 Introduction 14 Administration and Management 17 Partners and Trail Resource Stewards 17 Resource Identification, Protection, and Monitoring 19 National Historic Trail Rights-of-Way 44 Mapping and Resource Inventory 44 Partnership Certification Program 45 Trail Use Experience 47 Interpretation/Education 47 Primary Interpretive Themes 48 Secondary Interpretive Themes 48 Recreational Opportunities 49 Local Tour Routes 49 Health and Safety 49 User Capacity 50 Costs 50 Operations i Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents 51 Funding 51 Gaps in Information and
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN ARIZONA PROVINCE (024) by W.C
    NORTHERN ARIZONA PROVINCE (024) By W.C. Butler INTRODUCTION This province covers about 59,000 sq mi, mostly in the southwestern part of the Colorado Plateau. Significant geologic features include the Grand Canyon, Kaibab Arch, Mogollon Highlands transition zone, Monument Uplift, Defiance Uplift, Black Mesa Basin, Holbrook Basin, and southern edges of the Kaiparowits and Blanding Basins. The stratigraphic section shown for northeastern Arizona has demonstrated the highest petroleum potential in Arizona. See Wilson (1962), Butler (1988a), and Dickinson (1989) for synopses of the province's geology and evolution. The lithologically and structurally complex basement of the Colorado Plateau area evolved from northwest-younging Proterozoic terranes sequentially accreted onto the Archean craton. As much as 12,000 ft of Middle and Late Proterozoic strata is preserved in possible rift-aulacogen depositional settings in central Arizona. Thick, unmetamorphosed, organic-rich Late Proterozoic strata deposited in backarc basins or continental lakes of north-central Arizona and south-central Utah have good petroleum potential. The plateau area, as a passive Paleozoic plate margin and buffered Mesozoic retro-arc platform, has been remarkably tectonically stable during Phanerozoic time. The area is characterized by blanket Paleozoic strata, as much as 6,000 ft thick, consisting of mostly shallow marine clastics and carbonates showing numerous disconformities. These strata accumulated during transgressions and regressions from both the northwest and southeast, onlapping and thinning toward the trans-continental arch – a northeast-trending positive area extending from the northeast into central Arizona. Convergence between North and South American tectonic plates, with reactivation of basement blocks, during the late Paleozoic created the plateau's fault-bounded basins and uplifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Biotic Communities of the Southern Wasatch and Uinta Mountains, Utah C
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 6 Article 1 Number 1 – Number 4 11-15-1945 Biotic communities of the southern Wasatch and Uinta Mountains, Utah C. Lynn Hayward Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Hayward, C. Lynn (1945) "Biotic communities of the southern Wasatch and Uinta Mountains, Utah," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 6 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol6/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. .. The Great Basin Naturalist Published by the Department of Zoology and Entomology Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah X'oi.iMK \'\ X()VP:MP.KR 15, 1945 Nos. 1-4 BTOTTC COMMUNITIES OF THE SOUTHERN WASATCH AND UINTA MOUNTAINS, UTAH"' C. T.YXN HAYWARD(^) Associate Professor of Zoology P.rijiham Young University Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2 A. Scope and Nature of Problem 2 B. Methods 4 C. Review of Previous Work 8 IP TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY 9 A. Location and General Topography 9 B. Geological Histor}- 11 C. Glaciation 13 III. CLIMATE 13 A. Gene^^l Climate of Wasatch Mountains 13 P>. Climate of Mt. Timpanogos and L'intas 15 1 Temperature 15 2. Precipitation Pt 3. Relative Humidity 1/ ' 4. Wind 18 5. General Discussion 18 IV. CONCEPTS OF BIOTTC COMMUNITIES 1c> \-.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Northern Portion of the Fish Lake Plateau, Utah
    GEOLOGY OF THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE FISH LAKE PLATEAU, UTAH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State - University By DONALD PAUL MCGOOKEY, B.S., M.A* The Ohio State University 1958 Approved by Edmund M." Spieker Adviser Department of Geology CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION. ................................ 1 Locations and accessibility ........ 2 Physical features ......... _ ................... 5 Previous w o r k ......... 10 Field work and the geologic map ........ 12 Acknowledgements.................... 13 STRATIGRAPHY........................................ 15 General features................................ 15 Jurassic system......................... 16 Arapien shale .............................. 16 Twist Gulch formation...................... 13 Morrison (?) formation...................... 19 Cretaceous system .............................. 20 General character and distribution.......... 20 Indianola group ............................ 21 Mancos shale. ................... 24 Star Point sandstone................ 25 Blackhawk formation ........................ 26 Definition, lithology, and extent .... 26 Stratigraphic relations . ............ 23 Age . .............................. 23 Price River formation...................... 31 Definition, lithology, and extent .... 31 Stratigraphic relations ................ 34 A g e .................................... 37 Cretaceous and Tertiary systems . ............ 37 North Horn formation. ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Alpine Plant Communities Near King's Peak, Uinta Mountains, Utah
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 42 Number 1 Article 3 3-31-1982 Structure of alpine plant communities near King's Peak, Uinta Mountains, Utah George M. Briggs University of Montana, Missoula James A. MacMahon Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Briggs, George M. and MacMahon, James A. (1982) "Structure of alpine plant communities near King's Peak, Uinta Mountains, Utah," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 42 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol42/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. STRUCTURE OF ALPINE PLANT COMMUNITIES NEAR KING'S PEAK, UINTA MOUNTAINS, UTAH George M. Briggs' and James A. MacMahon- Abstract.- a study was made at 18 sites with elevations between 3512 and 3768 m in the Uinta Mountains, Utah. Sites were small in extent but typified vegetation patterns found in the Uintas. Standing crop, species compo- sition (based on dry weight), and values for several physical parameters were determined at each site. Simple linear regressions performed between the various biotic and abiotic characters revealed significant relationships between the characteristics of rocks visible at the surface (the number, size, and variation in size) and vegetation cover. This relationship was probably due to the burial of rocks as a region became vegetated. Bray and Curtis ordinations per- formed on the indicated data that there were several factors which influenced the species composition but that no single factor dictated the vegetational pattern.
    [Show full text]