1 Contact Information 2 Education
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The 2020 Oxford Journals Collection
The 2020 Oxford Journals Collection 357 high-quality journals Access to content back to 1996 academic.oup.com/journals/collection Medicine | Life Sciences | Humanities | Social Sciences Mathematics & Physical Sciences | Law 2 | OXFORD JOURNALS The 2020 Oxford Journals Collection published in Over partnership with many of the world’s most 70% influential scholarly and professional societies 357 high-quality SOCIAL journals SCIENCES HUMANITIES 6 LIFE subject SCIENCES collections MEDICINE MATHEMATICS & PHYSICAL SCIENCES LAW @OUPLibraries For further information visit: COLLECTION 2020 | 3 Nobel Prize winning journals authors in all 7 subject ranked #1 collections Over in at least one 6 category 200 MILLION DOWNLOADS in 2018 Joining in 2020… journals 7 Over Over 75% 70% of these are in the of journals have top 50% of at least an Impact Factor one category Impact Factor and Ranking Source: 2018 Journal Impact Factor, Journal Citation Reports (Web of Science Group, 2019) academic.oup.com/journals/collection @OUPLibraries 4 | OXFORD JOURNALS Rankings in Best JCR Subject Category Grand Total Mathematics & Physical Sciences Law Life Sciences Humanities Top 10% 10% to 25% Social Sciences 25% to 50% Bottom 50% Medicine No JCR Entry 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Impact Factor and Ranking Source: 2018 Journal Impact Factor, Journal Citation Reports (Web of Science Group, 2019) Cost per Citation ($) GRAND Food Health Agriculture Astronomy Biology Botany Chemistry Geography Geology Physics Zoology TOTAL Science Sciences OUP 0.15 0.12 0.09 -
The 2019 Oxford Journals Collection
1 | OXFORD JOURNALS The 2019 Oxford Journals Collection 357 high-quality journals 17 journals added in 2019 Access to content back to 1996 academic.oup.com/journals/collection Medicine | Life Sciences | Humanities | Social Sciences Mathematics@OUPLibraries & Physical Sciences | Law For further information visit: 2 | OXFORD JOURNALS The 2019 Oxford Journals Collection published in partnership with many of the world’s Over 70% most influential scholarly and professional societies 357 Over 70% high-quality of journals have an SOCIAL Impact Factor journals SCIENCES HUMANITIES 6 Over 80% subject of these are in the LIFE collections SCIENCES MEDICINE top 50% of at least one category MATHEMATICS & PHYSICAL 6 SCIENCES LAW journals ranked #1 in at least one category Nobel Prize Over Joining in winning authors 2019… 100 in million journals in both all established and downloads 6 subject collections 17 emerging fields in 2017 Impact Factor and Ranking Source: 2017 Journal Citation Reports® (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) @OUPLibraries For further information visit: COLLECTION 2019 | 3 Rankings in Best JCR Category Medicine Life Sciences Humanities Social Sciences Top 10% Mathematics & Physical Sciences 10% to 25% 25% to 50% Bottom 50% Law No JCR Entry 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Source: 2017 Journal Citation Reports® (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) Cost per Citation ($) Maths & GRAND Food Health Agriculture Astronomy Biology Botany Chemistry Geology Computer Physics Zoology TOTAL Science Sciences Science OUP 0.15 0.20 0.10 0.17 0.18 0.20 0.03 0.17 0.09 0.23 0.31 0.15 Survey 0.28 0.30 0.18 0.25 0.28 0.22 0.38 0.25 0.21 0.52 0.26 0.54 Business & Language Philosophy Political Social Education Geography History Law Music Psychology Sociology Economics & Literature & Religion Science Sciences OUP 0.22 0.47 0.52 0.83 0.60 1.15 0.50 0.60 0.52 0.14 0.25 0.22 Survey 0.60 0.72 0.45 1.63 1.92 0.52 3.14 6.95 0.75 0.27 0.88 0.55 The survey data shows the average cost per citation of journals in Clarivate Analytics Indexes (source: Library Journal Periodicals Price Survey 2018). -
The 2017 Oxford Journals
The 2017 Oxford Journals Collection The Oxford Journals Collection contains 324 prestigious and authoritative journals that are published in collaboration with some of the world’s most influential scholarly and professional societies ensuring excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Medicine | Life Sciences | Humanities | Social Sciences | Mathematics and Physical Sciences | Law 19 titles added in 2017 Access to high quality content dating back to 1996 www.oxfordjournals.org 1 Joining the Collection in 2017 (19 titles) The American Journal of American Journal of Biological Journal of the Biology of Comparative Law Legal History Linnean Society Reproduction Founded in 1952, Founded in 1957, The Biological The official it is the official the American Journal of the journal of the journal of the Journal of Legal Linnean Society Society for American Society History was the is a direct the Study of of Comparative first English- descendant Reproduction. Law, publishes language of the oldest The journal quarterly, and is periodical in the biological attracts an entirely devoted to comparative field. While retaining its focus journal in the world, which international group of authors, law – i.e. comparing the laws of on American legal history, it published the epoch-making with more than half of the one or more nations with those accommodates the enormous papers on evolution by Darwin submissions coming from of another or discussing one broadening of the intellectual and Wallace. The journal outside the US. One of the jurisdiction’s law in order for horizon of the discipline over the specializes in evolution in the most highly cited journals the reader to understand how past decade and is particularly broadest sense and covers all publishing original research it might differ from that of their interested in contributions of a taxonomic groups in all five in the field of reproductive country. -
Mendelian-Mutationism: the Forgotten Evolutionary Synthesis
Journal of the History of Biology (2014) 47:501–546 Ó The Author(s). This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com 2014 DOI 10.1007/s10739-014-9383-2 Mendelian-Mutationism: The Forgotten Evolutionary Synthesis ARLIN STOLTZFUS Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research 9600 Gudelsky Drive Rockville, MD 20850 USA E-mail: [email protected] Biosystems and Biomaterials Division NIST 100 Bureau Drive Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA KELE CABLE Program in the History of Science and Technology University of Minnesota 108 Pillsbury Hall, 310 Pillsbury Drive SE Minneapolis, MN 55455-0231 USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. According to a classical narrative, early geneticists, failing to see how Mendelism provides the missing pieces of Darwin’s theory, rejected gradual changes and advocated an implausible yet briefly popular view of evolution-by-mutation; after decades of delay (in which synthesis was prevented by personal conflicts, disciplinary rivalries, and anti-Darwinian animus), Darwinism emerged on a new Mendelian basis. Based on the works of four influential early geneticists – Bateson, de Vries, Morgan and Punnett –, and drawing on recent scholarship, we offer an alternative that turns the classical view on its head. For early geneticists, embracing discrete inheritance and the mutation theory (for the origin of hereditary variation) did not entail rejection of selection, but rejection of Darwin’s non-Mendelian views of heredity and variation, his doctrine of natura non facit saltum, and his conception of ‘‘natural selection’’ as a creative force that shapes features out of masses of infinitesimal differences. We find no evidence of a delay in synthesizing mutation, rules of discrete inheritance, and selection in a Mendelian-Mutationist Synthesis.