DOCSLIB.ORG

April 1 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
April 1 2020 Israel and the Middle East News Update Wednesday, April 1 Headlines: • Justice Ministry and Knesset Speaker Among Last Hurdles in Unity Talks • Blue and White Under Pressure to Compromise on Ministers • Sa’ar: Gantz Should Prevent ‘Inflated’ Unity Govt’ During Time of Crisis • Syria: Air Defenses Down Missiles from Israeli Warplanes • IDF's Top Military Commander Tests Negative for Coronavirus • Nearly a Quarter of Israel’s Workforce Unemployed due to Virus Outbreak • Gov't Mulls Lockdown on Haredi Cities as Coronavirus Patients Hit 5,591 • Palestinian Forces Conduct Rare Operation in Jerusalem Neighborhood Commentary: • Yedioth Ahronoth: “‘Chaos Reigns in the Absence of a Plan” - By Nadav Eyal, Channel Thirteen News’ foreign news editor • Al Monitor: “Why Gantz Needed to Replace Netanyahu's Knesset Speaker” - By Ksenia Svetlova, former Knesset member for Hatnua Party S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org News Excerpts April 1, 2020 Ha’aretz Justice Ministry and Knesset Speaker Among Last Hurdles in Unity Talks Likud and Kahol Lavan officials hope to be able to finalize coalition talks and expect a government to be sworn in on Monday, April 6, a few days before Passover begins.The cancellation of a meeting between PM Netanyahu and Kahol Lavan leader Benny Gantz, scheduled to take place on Monday, delayed the process. The meeting was reportedly postponed as Netanyahu went into self-quarantine at his official residence after one of his aides tested positive for coronavirus. Netanyahu himself tested negative. Negotiations are focusing on government appointments, with the Justice Ministry a major point of contention. Likud is strenuously opposing the appointment of Kahol Lavan lawmaker Avi Nissenkorn to the role, preferring Chili Tropper, who is also of Kahol Lavan but preferred by Netanyahu and his right-wing bloc. See also “Netanyahu seeks to draw out unity talks, as Gantz’s hand weakens” (TOI) Jerusalem Post Blue and White Under Pressure to Compromise on Ministers Blue and White leader Benny Gantz faced pressure on Tuesday to give up his demand for the same number of ministers as the Likud and its satellite parties after complaints about the size of the government during an economic crisis caused by the coronavirus. Likud and Blue and White’s negotiating teams met on Tuesday night by video conference after a day and a half with no talks. The current plan remains for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s bloc of Likud, Shas, United Torah Judaism and Yamina to have 15 ministers and for Blue and White and Labor to have the same, even though the Right-Center bloc would have 58 MKs and the Center-Left bloc 19. See also “Chairing his first full Knesset session, Gantz faces assaults from former allies” (TOI) Times of Israel Sa’ar: Gantz Should Prevent ‘Inflated’ Unity Govt’ During Time of Crisis In the economic climate created by the coronavirus crisis, Israel cannot afford the next government to be the largest in its history, and Blue and White leader Benny Gantz has the ability to prevent this, Likud MK and former leadership contender Gideon Sa’ar said in an interview with Channel 12 on Tuesday evening.He spoke as a source close to negotiations told Channel 13 news that a crucial video conference call was being held between the sides on Tuesday evening, and that if no deal between Gantz and PM Netanyahu was reached by the weekend it might not be made at all. Ynet News Syria: Air Defenses Down Missiles From Israeli Warplanes Syria's state-run SANA media outlet said that the country's air defenses opened fire Tuesday night on missiles launched from Israeli warplanes on the central province of Homs, shooting down some of them, state media said. State TV said the warplanes fired the missiles while flying in Lebanese airspace. The outlet said the warplanes targeted a Syrian army position without saying where exactly. It added that some of the missiles were shot down. The Lebanese pro-Hezbollah Al Mayadeen channel reported that the attack was aimed at "military sites east of Homs." The UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that, "the Israeli Air Force has launched an attack on Shayrat airfield with more than eight missiles." See also, “Syria air defences down Israeli missiles over Homs: state media” (Al Jazeera) 2 I24 News IDF's Top Military Commander Tests Negative for Coronavirus Israel's top military, IDF Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Aviv Kochavi, has tested negative for coronavirus a day after entering going into quarantine along with two members of his close team. "The Chief of Staff feels good and will remain in isolation until the end of the week," an IDF spokesperson unit statement said. Kochavi voluntarily went into self-isolation on Tuesday after coming into contact with an IDF commander who tested positive for COVID-19 coronavirus. On March 22 Lt.-Gen. Kochavi attended a meeting with a Home Front commander, where one of the military attendees was diagnosed with the coronavirus Tuesday, according to an IDF statement. See also “IDF chief in quarantine after contact with coronavirus sufferer” (Ynet News) Times of Israel Nearly a Quarter of Israel’s Workforce Unemployed due to Virus Outbreak The unemployment rate climbed to 23.4 percent on Tuesday with over 800,000 Israelis put out of work in March due to the coronavirus pandemic. Some 24,000 newly out of work Israelis registered for unemployment on Monday. Among those seeking state benefits, 89.8% have been placed on unpaid leave by their workplaces, while 6.3% were fired, according to the National Employment Service. The month of March was one of the worst for Israel’s job market in its history. Only a month ago, before the coronavirus outbreak, unemployment in Israel was at a record low of under 4%. Some 812,000 Israelis were put out of work since the start of the crisis. There are now 969,693 Israelis seeking unemployment benefits, counting the 160,000 who were already on unemployment before the crisis See also, “Unemployment in Israel: 989,000 apply for benefits, 23.8% of workforce” (JPost) Jerusalem Post Gov't Mulls Lockdown on Haredi Cities as Coronavirus Patients hit 5,591 The government is considering imposing a full lockdown on haredi (ultra-Orthodox) cities and towns in which the number of people infected with coronavirus continues to rise. A team of top scientists said it expects Israel will have 500 critically ill patients by next week. “[On Monday], there were talks between the prime minister, health minister and defense minister, and we are preparing for such a scenario with Home Front Command,” Health Ministry director-general said Tuesday in a live-streamed interview. Specifically, the number of people infected with the virus continues to spike in the haredi city of Bnei Brak, where there has been an increase of 66 sick people in one. See also, “One-Third Of Bnei Brak Residents Tested For COVID-19 Are Positive, ER Screening Chareidi Patients” (WIN) Ha’aretz Palestinian Forces Conduct Rare Operation in Jerusalem Neighborhood Armed security forces from the Palestinian Authority conducted a rare operation in a Jerusalem neighborhood that is within the Israeli municipal boundaries of Jerusalem, but on the West Bank side of the separation wall. Palestinian sources say Israel was notified of the operation in advance. Palestinian security forces openly entered Kafr Aqab to calm the situation there, following a gun battle among Palestinians over a roadblock set up to enforce the lockdown the Palestinian Authority has imposed to stop the spread of the coronavirus in the territory under its jurisdiction. About two weeks ago, the residents of Kafr Aqab established their own neighborhood committee to combat the coronavirus. After the Palestinian Authority imposed a lockdown on all the towns and villages in PA- administered territory, the committee decided to set up a roadblock to halt traffic. 3 Yedioth Ahronoth – April 1, 2020 Chaos Reigns in the Absence of a Plan By Nadav Eyal, Channel Thirteen News’ foreign news editor • Several weeks ago an article was printed in this newspaper that argued that Israel needed an orderly national plan to fight the coronavirus and to return life to normal. Several weeks have passed and Israel still has no plan, and chaos reigns. Planning teams have been formed at universities and other planning teams have been formed in the high-tech community. An acquisitions war room under the Mossad director’s command was formed, and a second war room under the command of IDF special forces officers was also formed. Teams have been working with information from the Health Ministry and the Gartner Institute that isn’t available to everyone. Power struggles have been underway among top health care system officials: hospital directors have been fighting Health Ministry officials, and Health Ministry officials have been fighting with one another. One day they say that more tests are going to be done. The next day we’re told that there’s no point to testing. Masks? No need, said Prof. Sadetzki, who suddenly showed up the next day wearing a mask and bearing news of a new (and necessary) policy that was long ago the subject of global studies. And mainly, time and time again, a single and sole method: lockdown and more lockdown and increasingly stricter restrictions. • Here are the hard facts. The death rate in Israel is currently low because the state took proper action initially by quarantining people returning from overseas. The credit for that goes to the Health Ministry and its directors, and to Prime Minister Netanyahu, all of whom perceived the severity of the threat in its early stages.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lost Decade of the Israeli Peace Camp
    The Lost Decade of the Israeli Peace Camp By Ksenia Svetlova Now that Israeli annexation of Jewish settlements in the West Bank is a commonplace notion, it seems almost impossible that just twelve years ago, Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) were making significant progress in the US-sponsored bilateral peace negotiations. Since then, the stalemate in the talks has become the new normal, under three consecutive governments headed by Benjamin Netanyahu. The Palestinians, led by Mahmoud Abbas and his government, have been cast as “diplomatic terrorists” for asking the international community for help. The Israeli peace camp has been subjected to a vicious smear campaign that has shaken its self-esteem and ruined its chances of winning over the public. This systematic smearing of Israeli and Palestinian two-staters has paid off. In the April 2019 elections, Israel’s progressive Meretz party teetered on the edge of the electoral barrier while Labor, once the ruling party, gained only six mandates (5% of the votes). The centrist Blue and White, a party led by ex-army chief Benny Gantz, carefully avoided any mention of loaded terms such as “the two-state solution” or “evacuation of settlements”, only calling vaguely to “advance peace” – as part of Israel’s new political vocabulary, which no longer includes “occupation” or even “the West Bank”. Despite offering no clear alternative to the peace option it managed to successfully derail, the Israeli right under Netanyahu has been in power for over a decade in a row, since 2009. Israel’s left-wing parties are fighting to survive; the Palestinians are continuing their fruitless efforts to engage the international community; and the horrid reality of a single state, in which different groups have different political and civil rights, seems just around the corner.
    [Show full text]
  • A Future for Israeli-Palestinian Peacebuilding
    Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre A future for Israeli-Palestinian peacebuilding Ned Lazarus July 2017 The Israel-Palestine conflict is one of the most heavily researched in the world. Yet a shockingly small fraction of this research focuses on the millions of Israelis and Palestinians who share this land, their relations with one another, and how such relations could be improved so that a breakthrough might be possible. This report is both timely and necessary, and can hopefully provide a blueprint for greater international support of civil society efforts to foster conflict resolution. John Lyndon Executive Director of OneVoice Europe and Research Fellow at Kings College London BICOM, the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre, is an independent British think tank producing research and analysis to increase understanding of Israel and the Middle East in the UK. Fathom: for a deeper understanding of Israel and the region is BICOM’s online research journal, publishing interviews, articles and reviews from a range of Israeli, Palestinian and international contributors. Front Cover Photo: EcoPeace’s Israeli, Jordanian and Palestinian directors and staff standing together in the Jordan River as part of their campaign to rehabilitate the river which is dwindling due to diversion of its source waters and pollution. Photograph used by permission of EcoPeace. The Author Ned Lazarus is Visiting Professor of International Affairs at the George Washington University’s Elliott School, and an Israel Institute Teaching Fellow. A conflict resolution scholar, practitioner and evaluator, Ned has conducted evaluative studies of Israeli-Palestinian peacebuilding initiatives on behalf of USAID, USIP and the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • There Is No “Status Quo” Drivers of Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
    THERE IS NO “STATUS QUO” DRIVERS OF VIOLENCE IN THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT NATHAN STOCK AUGUST 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the publisher. Copyright © 2019 The Middle East Institute The Middle East Institute 1763 N Street NW Washington, D.C. 20036 Follow MEI: @MiddleEastInst /MiddleEastInstitute There is No “Status Quo” Drivers of Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Nathan Stock iv | About the author nathan stock Nathan Stock is a non-resident scholar at the Middle East Institute. Prior to joining MEI he spent nine years working for former President Carter’s organization, The Carter Center. He served in the Center’s Conflict Resolution Program, out of Atlanta, GA, before moving to Jerusalem to run the Center’s Israel-Palestine Field Office. Stock led Carter Center efforts to facilitate the reunification of the Palestinian political system and to assert Palestinian sovereignty via international fora. He designed and managed projects targeting the Fatah-Hamas conflict, and implemented programming to monitor and advance political solutions to the Syrian civil war. Prior to joining the Center, Stock worked in Afghanistan on a USAID-funded grant to strengthen local civil society organizations. During the Al-Aqsa Intifada, he lived in the Gaza Strip, working with a Palestinian NGO to design and fundraise for conflict resolution programs targeting the Palestinian community.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Possible Annexation of West Bank Areas: Frequently Asked
    Israel’s Possible Annexation of West Bank Areas: Frequently Asked Questions Updated July 14, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46433 SUMMARY R46433 Israel’s Possible Annexation of West Bank July 14, 2020 Areas: Frequently Asked Questions Jim Zanotti Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has stated his intent for Israel to annex parts Specialist in Middle of the West Bank in 2020. Annexation could raise issues for Congress, and varying Eastern Affairs congressional views on the subject have contributed to debate about implications for U.S.-Israel relations. Congress may conduct additional oversight of Trump Administration actions and could modify or place conditions on U.S. funding for Israel, the Palestinians, and various international organizations. While the West Bank has been under Israeli military administration since its capture from Jordan in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, its status has been different from Israel proper (the territory Israel controlled before the war). Israel’s government has a mandate—based on the May 2020 power-sharing agreement between Netanyahu and Defense Minister Benny Gantz—to bring the matter of annexation to a cabinet and/or Knesset vote as early as July 1, 2020, provided that it is done in coordination with the United States. Palestinian leaders strongly oppose annexation, partly because it could undermine their hopes for a viable Palestinian state with territorial contiguity. Israeli annexation could thus have significant consequences for future U.S. efforts to secure a negotiated Israeli- Palestinian peace. In addition to the specific territorial and administrative impact of annexation, it could more broadly affect Palestinian national aspirations and the future of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Gaza, Israel’s efforts to reconcile its actions with its self-proclaimed identity as both a Jewish and a democratic state, and Israeli and Palestinian security concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • National Coalitions in Israel, 1984-1990
    NATIONAL COALITIONS IN ISRAEL, 1984-1990: THE POLITICS OF "NOT LOSING" A Thesis for the degree of Ph.D. Presented to the University of London By Dan Korn London School of Economics May 1992 1 - UMI Number: U549931 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Disscrrlation Publishing UMI U549931 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 o ON CA lA N Abstract For six years since 1984 Israel underwent a unique p o litic al experience: i t was ruled by national coalitions supported by more than 75% of the members of parliament. Larger-than-minimal coalitions have always been problematic for traditional coalition theory. The Israeli case provides therefore an opportunity to examine the various actors' motivations and behaviour, as they reflect on coalition theory at 1arge. The assumption that actors are driven by "win maximization" is central to formal models of coalition theory. This assumption led to predictions of winning coalitions which are minimal in size, membership or ideological scope. Non-minimal coalitions were regarded as suboptimal choices, explainable on an ad hoc basis, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arrangements Law: Issues and International Comparisons
    The Knesset Research and Information Center Background Paper THE ARRANGEMENTS LAW: ISSUES AND INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS Written in Hebrew and translated into English by Dr. Susan Hattis Rolef Head of the International Desk The Knesset Research and Information Center Jerusalem, January 2, 2006 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………. 3 2. The Background to the Israeli Arrangements Law, and its development……. 3 3. The issues…………………………………………………………………………. 5 3.1. Anti-democratic legislation………………………………………………... 6 3.2. What should the Arrangements Law include?…………………………….. 8 3.3. Which Knesset Committees ought to deal with the Arrangements Law?…. 12 3.4. The problem of reservations to the Arrangements Law in the plenum……. 16 3.5. Cancellation of existing legislation………………………………………... 18 3.6. Increasing the amount of time devoted to dealing with the Arrangements Law 20 3.7. The clash between democracy and practice……………………………….. 21 4. Laws in other countries that are similar to the Arrangements Law in Israel 22 4.1. The myth that "there is no such law anywhere in the world”……………… 22 4.2. Belgium……………………………………………………………………. 24 4.3. Spain……………………………………………………………………….. 26 4.4. Italy………………………………………………………………………… 27 4.5. Austria……………………………………………………………………… 29 4.6. The United States…………………………………………………………... 30 5. Various approaches for dealing with the Arrangements Law………………… 33 5.1. Leaving the situation as is………………………………………………….. 33 5.2. Eliminating the Arrangements Law altogether…………………………….. 34 5.3. Leaving the Arrangements Law, while limiting its dimensions, and improving the procedures for dealing with it……………………………… 36 5.3.1. Amending the Rules of Procedure………………………………… 37 5.3.2. The amendment of the Budget Foundations Law, and/or the Knesset Law, and/or Basic Law: the State Economy……………..
    [Show full text]
  • 07-19-2019.Pdf
    Editorials ..................................... 4A Op-Ed .......................................... 5A Calendar ...................................... 6A Scene Around ............................. 9A Synagogue Directory ................ 11A News Briefs ............................... 13A WWW.HERITAGEFL.COM YEAR 43, NO. 46 JULY 19, 2019 16 TAMUZ, 5779 ORLANDO, FLORIDA SINGLE COPY 75¢ NEA spreads lies about Israel By Christine DeSouza American Friends Service committee, U.S. Campaign The National Education for Palestinian Rights, Jews Association has an agenda Against Anti-Muslim Racism, that is not hidden. At the and Jewish Voice for Peace. recent NEA assembly, attend NEA will partner with the by 7,000 delegates, the order No Way to Treat Child Cam- of business to be discussed paign to pressure the Israeli included New Business Item government to end the deten- 26 that stated: “NEA will use tion and abuse of Palestinian existing digital communica- children.” tion to develop and publish “NEA is the largest labor resources to educate members union and professional inter- and the general public on est group in the United States. the apartheid, atrocities, and The organization’s original gross violations of human mission was to advance the rights of Palestinian children cause of public education, and families by the State of from pre-school to university Israel, funded directly by the graduate programs. They have United States. affiliated organizations in NEA will publish an article every state and in more than in the NEA Today on the 14,000 communities across work that is being done by the U.S. This “new business,” Seth Wenig our members and organiza- however, promotes a political In this photo from July 2, 2019, people pray at the gravesite of Rabbi Menachem M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unexplored Option: Jewish Settlements in a Palestinian State
    Penn State International Law Review Volume 25 Article 4 Number 1 Penn State International Law Review 7-1-2006 The nexU plored Option: Jewish Settlements in a Palestinian State David Morris Philip Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr Recommended Citation Philip, David Morris (2006) "The nexU plored Option: Jewish Settlements in a Palestinian State," Penn State International Law Review: Vol. 25: No. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr/vol25/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Penn State International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Unexplored Option: Jewish Settlements in a Palestinian State David Morris Phillips* I. Introduction The withdrawal of Israeli settlers and soldiers from the Gaza Strip in August and September 2005 inevitably focused both Israeli and world attention upon the fate of Jewish settlements on the West Bank.' World focus only intensified with formation of a new Israeli government led by the Kadima party and its head, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert,2 following Hamas' victory in the Palestinian National Authority elections.3 In accord with prior campaign pledges,4 0 lmert announced his intention to * Professor of Law, Northeastern University School of Law. This article was presented at faculty seminars at Touro Law School and Northeastern University School of Law. The author would like to thank Darleen Cantelo, Sholom Fine and Stacey Dippong, Northeastern University law students, and Sue Zago, Sharon Persons, and Alfreda Russell, Northeastern University law librarians, for their invaluable research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • J Street Program
    Program2015Final4.indd 1 3/17/15 8:19 AM J STREET BOARD OF DIRECTORS J Street is the political home for pro-Israel, pro-peace Americans fighting for the future of Israel as the democratic homeland of the Jewish people. We believe that Israel’s Jewish and democratic character depends on a two-state solution, resulting in a Palestinian state living alongside Israel in peace and security. J Street Education Fund, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization. It aims to educate targeted communities about the need for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, to raise the visibility of a SUNDAY, MARCH 22 • 8:30–10 AM SUNDAY, mainstream pro-Israel, pro-peace presence within the American Jewish community, as well as to promote open, dynamic and spirited conversation about how to best advance the interests and future of a democratic, Jewish Israel. Members of the Tikva Society invest in J Street’s growth through multi-year increasing contributions. As of March 16, 2015 2 • A CLEAR CHOICE FOR A BETTER FUTURE #JSt2015 • jstreet.org Program2015Final4.indd 2 3/17/15 8:19 AM J STREET BOARD OF DIRECTORS Morton H. Halperin, Chair Daniel Kohl Alexandra C. Stanton, Vice-Chair (Co-Chair, JStreetPAC) Victor A. Kovner (Co-Chair, JStreetPAC) Kenneth Bob, Treasurer Charles Kremer Jeremy Ben-Ami Yaffa Maritz Nancy Bernstein William S. Singer Debra DeLee Ambassador Alan Solomont Howard Dickstein Robert Stein Molly Freeman Judith Zee Steinberg Davidi Gilo Ambassador Louis B. Susman Richard Goldwasser Sidney Topol Joanna Goodwin Friedman Carol Winograd Sylvia Kaplan TIKVA SOCIETY Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana International & Comparative Law Review
    INDIANA INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW VOLUME 11 2000-2001 INDIANA INTERNATIONAL & CoMAlATIvE LAW REVIEW Volume 11 2000 Number 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLES Constitutional Dialogues in Action: Canadian and Israeli Experiences in Comparative Perspective ......................... Gal Dor The Need for an Antidumping Market Structure Test in the Context of Free Trade Agreements ................ CharlesM Gasile andjames Leach 37 Dollarization of Ecuador: Sound Policy Dictates U.S. Assistance to this Economic Guinea Pig of Latin America ........................... Hale E. Sheppard 79 NOTES Mission Accomplished? Fifty-four Years of Suffering for the People of the Marshall Islands and the Latest Round of Endless Reconciliation ............................ John C. Babione 115 Israel's High Court ofJustice Ruling on the General Security Service Use of "Moderate Physical Pressure": An End to the Sanctioned Use of Torture? .......................... Melissa L Clark 145 The Development of a Global Hospital is Closer Than We Think: An Examination of the International Implications of Telemedicine and the Developments, Uses and Problems Facing International Telemedicine Programs ...................... P. Greg Gulick 183 Sex Discrimination in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: The Sex Discrimination Ordinance, The Equal Opportunities Commission, and a Proposal for Change ........ Allyson Singer 215 CONSTITUTIONAL DIALOGUES IN ACTION: CANADIAN AND ISRAELI EXPERIENCES IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE. Gal Dor* I. INTRODUCTION Despite being over
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting Delegations—20Th Knesset
    The Knesset Visiting Delegations—20th Knesset Since April 2015, the 20th Knesset has welcomed some 350 visiting delegations from abroad. Below are some highlights of this work, which point to the variety of national and professional backgrounds represented in these delegations. Visit of the Secretary General of the Parliament of Georgia Participants: Dates: 11–12 December 2018 Details: In December 2018, the Secretary General of the Parliament of Georgia visited the Knesset. He was accompanied by a delegation that included the Deputy Secretary General, the Secretary General of the Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Adjara, and the Knesset’s contact person in the Parliament of Georgia. During the visit, the delegation was shown various aspects of the Knesset's administrative work: human resources, transparency, information and technology, accessibility, and more. A meeting with the Board of Oversight and Review of Specially Designated Secrets of the Japanese House of Representatives (the Diet) Participants: MK Avi Dichter, chairman of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, and Mr. Shmuel Letko, the director of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, and MK Tzipi Livni Dates: 30 July 2018 Details: On July 29 and 30, the Knesset hosted a delegation of the Board of Oversight and Review of Specially Designated Secrets of the Japanese House of Representatives. The delegation came to Israel to learn about the management of confidential information, the regulation of information classification, and the relationship between the executive branch and the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee and its subcommittees. As part of the visit, the delegation members met with Opposition Leader MK Livni, chairman of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee MK Dichter, and with committee director Shmuel Letko, with whom they discussed the committee's work and information management procedures.
    [Show full text]